Earth First!: the Rise of Eco-Action

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Earth First!: the Rise of Eco-Action EARTH FIRST!: THE RISE OF ECO-ACTION By Sierra Braggs A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Social Science: Environment & Community Committee Membership Elizabeth Watson, Ph.D., Committee Chair Anthony V. Silvaggio, Ph.D., Committee Member J. Mark Baker, Ph.D., Committee Member J. Mark Baker, Ph.D., Graduate Coordinator December 2012 ABSTRACT EARTH FIRST!: THE RISE OF ECO-ACTION Sierra Braggs This thesis examines the change in Earth First! praxis elaborated by North Coast Earth First! (in Northern California) from 1985-1990 in order to identify how Judi Bari’s theory of “revolutionary ecology” emerged as political force from within a movement founded upon wilderness preservationism and the exclusion of people from nature, creating space for alliances between environmental activists and timber workers to emerge and exposing an emerging politics of encounter underway in the North Coast. Assessments of Earth First! typically focus on its proliferation of direct action interventions against industrial destruction and Judi Bari’s leadership in diverging from traditional EF! wilderness preservationism, most notably her attempts to build alliances between EF! activists and timber workers. To date, scholars have failed to assess how the structural formation of EF! as a decentralized anti-authoritarian non-organization has facilitated not only the proliferation of direct action interventions against industrial destruction, but also a highly reflexive radical environmental praxis. I argue that the shift toward what Jonathan London has termed a “post-wilderness environmentalism” was fostered by a “culture of anarchism” combined with an emergent “politics of encounter” operating within the larger Earth First! movement. The thesis elaborates a better ii understanding of Earth First! organizational structure, movement agenda, and cognitive praxis, highlighting open membership, oppositional systems of information, insurgent learning spaces, and commitments to anti-authoritarian politics as critical to an innovative radical environmental praxis. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am forever changed from my encounters with Accíon Zapatista de Humboldt. The research contained herein is the product of ongoing, collective inquiry into methods for resisting neoliberalism and convivial tools for building “another world.” Thanks to Manuel “Manolo” Callahan for the invitation to use this thesis as an opportunity to conduct research in order to advance social movement, and for ongoing and insightful dialogue, critique, and engagement with my research and writing over the last seven years. Thanks to Verbena for her insight into Earth First!, love, and being the change I always hope to see in the world. The final thesis could not have been achieved without the direct daily support of my mother-in-law (and so much more) Alice, and my soulmate James who provided ongoing encouragement and made significant sacrifices so that I could finish. I owe my love of Nature and desire for sustainability to my parents and grandparents, who gifted me with a childhood of swimming in pristine rivers and lakes, hiking in the mountains, and playing with rainbow trout, salamanders, and frogs. Finally, for help editing in the “eleventh hour” I thank my thesis committee, sister Holly, and long-time friend Nina. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iv PREFACE ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION: TOWARD A POST-WILDERNESS ENVIRONMENTALISM....... 9 Toward a Post-Wilderness Environmentalism ............................................................. 11 CHAPTER 1 “TIMBER WARS” ..................................................................................... 21 Deep Ecology & Radical Environmental Movement ............................................... 26 Jobs v. Environment .................................................................................................. 31 CHAPTER 2 EARTH FIRST!: THE RISE OF ECO-ACTION ....................................... 35 Cultural Expression ....................................................................................................... 40 Earthen-Spirituality ................................................................................................... 40 Subcultures ................................................................................................................ 44 Repertoire of Political Action ....................................................................................... 48 Image Events ............................................................................................................. 49 Monkeywrenching .................................................................................................... 51 Round River Rendezvous ......................................................................................... 52 Language of Resistance ................................................................................................ 56 Friction .......................................................................................................................... 61 CHAPTER 3 NORTH COAST EARTH FIRST!: THE IMPACT OF REVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY .................................................................................... 65 Redwood Encounters .................................................................................................... 68 v Pacific Lumber Company ......................................................................................... 72 Headwaters Campaign .............................................................................................. 77 Direct Action ............................................................................................................. 80 Revolutionary Ecology ................................................................................................. 83 Leadership ................................................................................................................. 86 Breaking with Tradition ............................................................................................ 90 CHAPTER 4 REDWOOD SUMMER: FROM ECOTAGE TO MASS MOVEMENT .. 96 Music ......................................................................................................................... 98 Proliferation ................................................................................................................ 102 Beyond Redwood Summer ......................................................................................... 102 CONCLUSION: THE PROLIFERATION OF ECO-ACTION ..................................... 109 Significance of Earth First! ..................................................................................... 110 Limits of EF! ........................................................................................................... 111 Contributions of NCEF! .......................................................................................... 112 Limits of NCEF! ..................................................................................................... 113 Blue-Green Alliances .................................................................................................. 116 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 122 vi 1 PREFACE Insights into Earth First! in this thesis are largely informed by my own affinity for radical environmental work in the redwoods of Northern California. My relationships with Earth First! and present day forest defenders as well as warriors for justice have generated the networks from which my deepest learning has been informed. My participation in skill shares, direct actions, and several collective popular education sessions from within these networks has facilitated major sites of knowledge production where this research has been mutually informed/informing of understanding of social and environmental struggles in the redwoods. In addition to my participation in several activities organized by forest defenders, I have also facilitated a number of coyuntur@s. Coyuntur@ means “conjunctural analysis” and is comprised of collective popular education encounters that seek to generate a shared analysis, both historical and present oriented, of the conditions of struggle – political, economic, social, etc. - in any given locale. This method emerges from Latin American social movements and accounts for the particularities of a socio- historic moment in which a social movement finds itself.1 Coyuntur@ attends to the externalities of social movements, but without the structural bias present in Political Process Theory (PPT). Unlike PPT, coyuntur@, does not offer theoretical “causes” for the emergence or success of social movements. Rather, 1 Servicio Jesuita a Refugiados--México, Servicios Informativos Procesados, “Methodology of Coyuntural Analysis, Notebook #1: The Epistemological Review of Coyuntural Analysis,” 7. 2 coyuntur@ seeks to generate a shared analysis, from within social movement, in order to advance strategic interventions by said movement.2 Bevington
Recommended publications
  • Radical Environmentalism: the New Civil Disobedience?
    Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 6 Issue 1 Fall/Winter 2007 Article 35 November 2007 Radical Environmentalism: The New Civil Disobedience? Cesar Cuauhtemoc Garcia Hernandez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Recommended Citation Hernandez, Cesar Cuauhtemoc Garcia (2007) "Radical Environmentalism: The New Civil Disobedience?," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol. 6 : Iss. 1 , Article 35. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol6/iss1/35 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seattle Journal for Social Justice by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 289 Radical Environmentalism: The New Civil Disobedience? César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández1 God said, “I have given you every seed-bearing plant which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree that bears fruit with seed. It will be for your food. To every wild animal, to every bird of the sky, to everything that creeps along the ground, to everything that has the breath of life, I give every green plant for food.” So it was. God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. Book of Genesis2 We know that the white man does not understand our ways. One portion of land is the same to him as the next, for he is a stranger who comes in the night and takes from the land whatever he needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregating the Scare from the Greens
    DISAGGREGATING THE SCARE FROM THE GREENS Lee Hall*† INTRODUCTION When the Vermont Law Review graciously asked me to contribute to this Symposium focusing on the tension between national security and fundamental values, specifically for a segment on ecological and animal- related activism as “the threat of unpopular ideas,” it seemed apt to ask a basic question about the title: Why should we come to think of reverence for life or serious concern for the Earth that sustains us as “unpopular ideas”? What we really appear to be saying is that the methods used, condoned, or promoted by certain people are unpopular. So before we proceed further, intimidation should be disaggregated from respect for the environment and its living inhabitants. Two recent and high-profile law-enforcement initiatives have viewed environmental and animal-advocacy groups as threats in the United States. These initiatives are the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) prosecution and Operation Backfire. The former prosecution targeted SHAC—a campaign to close one animal-testing firm—and referred also to the underground Animal Liberation Front (ALF).1 The latter prosecution *. Legal director of Friends of Animals, an international animal-rights organization founded in 1957. †. Lee Hall, who can be reached at [email protected], thanks Lydia Fiedler, the Vermont Law School, and Friends of Animals for making it possible to participate in the 2008 Symposium and prepare this Article for publication. 1. See Indictment at 14–16, United States v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA, Inc., No. 3:04-cr-00373-AET-2 (D.N.J. May 27, 2004), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/files/ pdffiles/shacind.pdf (last visited Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Contest/Candidate Proof List: 2016
    Contest/Candidate Proof List 2016 Presidential Primary Election Contests: 1001 to 5028 - Contests On Ballot Candidates are in Random Alpha Order Candidates: Qualified Candidates Num Num Contest/District Vote For Cands Qualified Status Partisan PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES President of the US DEM 1001 President DEM, DEM *0-0 County of Sacramento 1 7 7 ON BALLOT Incumbent(s): Barack Obama Elected Candidate(s): KEITH JUDD Qualified Date: 3/11/2016 No Ballot Designation User Codes: Cand ID: 4 Filing Fee: $0.00 Fees Paid: $0.00 $0.00 Requirements Status ------------------------------------------------------- Sigs In Lieu Issued Sigs In Lieu Filed Declaration of Intent Issued Declaration of Intent Filed Candidate Statement Issued Candidate Statement Filed Declaration of Candidacy Issued Declaration of Candidacy Filed Code of Fair Campaign Practices Filed Ballot Designation Worksheet Issued Ballot Designation Worksheet Filed MICHAEL STEINBERG Qualified Date: 3/11/2016 No Ballot Designation User Codes: Cand ID: 6 Filing Fee: $0.00 Fees Paid: $0.00 $0.00 Requirements Status ------------------------------------------------------- Sigs In Lieu Issued Sigs In Lieu Filed Declaration of Intent Issued Declaration of Intent Filed Candidate Statement Issued Candidate Statement Filed Declaration of Candidacy Issued Declaration of Candidacy Filed Code of Fair Campaign Practices Filed Ballot Designation Worksheet Issued Ballot Designation Worksheet Filed BERNIE SANDERS Qualified Date: 3/11/2016 No Ballot Designation User Codes: Cand ID: 5 Filing Fee: $0.00
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Environmentalism ~ the Initial Decades a Historical, Documentary Bibliography
    Radical Environmentalism ~ The Initial Decades A Historical, Documentary Bibliography This resource continues to be refined – some links may not be created yet. This bibliography provides a partially annotated, thematic review the central religious, ethical, and political dimensions, and the key historical watersheds, which occurred during the initial decades of the radical environmental movement. It focuses especially on Earth First!, but seeks also to illuminate kindred movements and its splinter group, such as the Earth Liberation Front. The Critique of Western, Industrial Civilization, the Case against Anthropocentrism and Humanism, and “Deep Ecology” as a Proposed Alternative Worldview. Radical environmentalism articulated a comprehensive critique of western civilization, both its religions and philosophical underpinnings as well as its agricultural and industrial modes of production. Soon after Earth First! was founded to advance a biocentric ethics and militant strategy, in early 1982, its founders became acquainted with “deep ecology.” They quickly deep ecology as a convenient trope for their own ethical perspectives. The following articles provide a representative sample of those articulating the radical environmental social critique, fledgling articulation of the alternative worldview and required militant tactics, and manifesto-like calls to action. From the mid-1980s, the articles deal increasingly with tensions in the growing movement, as authors begin criticize and defend aspects deep ecology and radical environmental ideology, as they had been articulated in the early years of Earth First. **Foreman, Dave. "Earth First!" The Progressive 45, no. 10 (October 1981): 39-42. An important manifesto and call for environmental activists to put the Earth First! and take on the earth’s destroyers with direct action resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism Thomas J
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Student Theses 2015-Present Environmental Studies Spring 5-15-2016 Controlling What Is Wild: The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism Thomas J. Levendosky Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/environ_2015 Recommended Citation Levendosky, Thomas J., "Controlling What Is Wild: The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism" (2016). Student Theses 2015-Present. 33. https://fordham.bepress.com/environ_2015/33 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses 2015-Present by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Controlling What Is Wild The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act and Ecoterrorism Thomas Levendosky Environmental Studies 4000: Senior Thesis May 15, 2016 1 Abstract This thesis examines the extremist side of the environmental activism commonly known as ecoterrorism, and the subsequent implications of categorizing criminal activism as terrorism. Groups such as Earth First!, the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), and the Environmental Liberation Front (ELF) strive to protect the natural world from the detrimental impacts of industrialization. Activists affiliated with these groups endorse direct action against environmentally harmful enterprises. Extremists are motivated by the belief that they are on the frontline defending the defenseless. They hope to dissuade corporations and government agencies from exploiting the natural world by exposing unethical practices and causing economic damage. The strategy of direct action can involve sabotaging of industrial equipment (monkeywrenching), arson, and tree spiking. Direct action also promotes nonviolent protest and civil disobedience to obstruct industrial development.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Socialist Wice 1? /?Evp/Y/Ilt«1"1 Fimin;M
    This planet is our Miners' message planet-labor & to Moscow: the environment "Gorbachev out!" Page 3 Page 24 f&, Freedom Socialist Wice 1? /?evP/y/ilt«1"1 fiMiN;M. May-July 1991 Volume 12, Number 4 ($1.00 outside U.S.) 75 .. Bush's obscene vidory: recession, repression, reaction & ruin wenty years after Vietnam, the glow, doesn't it? All that high-minded Big Oil, bankers, and brokers of U.S. Air Force finally got to garbage out of Washington about arms are rich from this war. bomb a Third World country "stopping Saddam's aggression"-and American workers, and T back to the Stone Age. now these post-blitz atrocities. Oh well, workers abroad, will Iraq was blown to smithereens. as Henry Kissinger remarked after the shoulder the billions Roads, bridges, farms, homes, hospitals, U.S. betrayed the Kurds in the 1970s, it cost. electricity, food warehouses, communi­ U.S. foreign policy isn't about "social to page 23 cations and sewage treatment facili­ work." What it is about in the Mideast ties-wiped out. Between 100,000 and is retaining imperialist control of the 200,000 Iraqi soldiers and civilians were oil. For this Bush needs compliant dic­ blasted to shreds by the bombs. Dead tators, not democracy, in the region. mothers and children litter the cities The hundreds of thousands of and towns. Water supplies are glutted Kurdish refugees on Iraq's northern with poisons and cholera is now up­ borders awaiting starvation or slaugh,t.er ping the body count. .by Saddam are proof of this.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Summary Report
    Page: 1 of 7 7/1/2016 4:20:45 PM Election Summary Report Closed Primary Imperial County June 07, 2016 Summary for: All Contests, All Districts, All Counting Groups OFFICIAL FINAL RESULTS Precincts Reported: 117 of 169 (69.23%) Ballots Cast: 23,897 Presidential Preference - Democratic (Vote for 1) DEM Precincts Reported: 117 of 169 (69.23%) Candidate Party Total HILLARY CLINTON DEM 9,843 65.00% BERNIE SANDERS DEM 5,111 33.75% ROQUE DE LA FUENTE DEM 80 0.53% WILLIE WILSON DEM 34 0.22% HENRY HEWES DEM 31 0.20% MICHAEL STEINBERG DEM 29 0.19% KEITH JUDD DEM 15 0.10% Write-in 1 0.01% Total Votes 15,144 Total WILLIE FELIX CARTER WRITE-IN 1 Presidential Preference - Republican (Vote for 1) REP Precincts Reported: 117 of 169 (69.23%) Candidate Party Total DONALD TRUMP REP 3,801 73.03% TED CRUZ REP 771 14.81% JOHN R. KASICH REP 348 6.69% BEN CARSON REP 254 4.88% JIM GILMORE REP 31 0.60% Write-in 0 0.00% Total Votes 5,205 Page: 2 of 7 7/1/2016 4:20:45 PM Presidential Preference - American Independent (Vote for 1) AI Precincts Reported: 117 of 169 (69.23%) Candidate Party Total ROBERT ORNELAS AI 55 38.19% ALAN SPEARS AI 22 15.28% J.R. MYERS AI 22 15.28% ARTHUR HARRIS AI 15 10.42% JAMES HEDGES AI 13 9.03% WILEY DRAKE AI 11 7.64% THOMAS HOEFLING AI 6 4.17% Write-in 0 0.00% Total Votes 144 Presidential Preference - Green (Vote for 1) GRN Precincts Reported: 117 of 169 (69.23%) Candidate Party Total JILL STEIN GRN 9 60.00% DARRYL CHERNEY GRN 4 26.67% WILLIAM KREML GRN 2 13.33% KENT MESPLAY GRN 0 0.00% SEDINAM MOYOWASIFSA- GRN 0 0.00% CURRY Write-in 0 0.00% Total Votes 15 Presidential Preference - Libertarian (Vote for 1) LIB Precincts Reported: 117 of 169 (69.23%) Candidate Party Total GARY JOHNSON LIB 34 55.74% AUSTIN PETERSEN LIB 7 11.48% RHETT WHITE FEATHER LIB 4 6.56% SMITH JOY WAYMIRE LIB 3 4.92% STEVE KERBEL LIB 3 4.92% DARRYL W.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Primary
    PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY, MARCH 1, 2016 Town of Hanson Precinct I Precinct II Precinct III Total DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE Bernie Sanders 319 335 343 997 Martin O'Malley 3 2 0 5 Hillary Clinton 240 256 196 692 Rdoque "Rocky" De La Fuente 0 1 0 1 No Preference 4 7 3 14 Write Ins (all others) 5 2 0 7 Blanks 4 2 2 8 STATE COMMITTEE MAN 2nd Plymouth & Bristol District Michael D. Brady 382 421 355 1158 Tony Branch 53 54 71 178 Write Ins (all others) 1 0 0 1 Blanks 139 130 118 387 STATE COMMITTEE WOMAN 2nd Plymouth & Bristol District Write Ins (all others) 7 4 9 20 Susan W. Robinson 2 0 0 2 Jenna L. Powers 1 0 0 1 Vinessa A. Mihos 1 0 0 1 Kathleen DiPasqua Egan 2 0 0 2 Margaret M. O'Connor 1 0 0 1 Linda S. Christensen 1 0 0 1 Barabra M. Ferguson 1 0 0 1 Kristen Ann Kames 0 1 0 1 Sandra L.Wilson 0 1 0 1 Laura A Fitzgerald-Kemmett 0 0 1 1 Kathleen A. Nee 0 0 1 1 Amber Marie Watson 0 0 1 1 Blanks 559 599 532 1690 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY, MARCH 1, 2016 Town of Hanson Precinct I Precinct II Precinct III Total TOWN COMMITTEE-35 to be elected Patrick M. O'Connor 252 263 231 746 Kathleen DiPasqua-Egan 250 277 264 791 James A. Egan 274 290 263 827 Joseph A. O'Sullivan 270 282 237 789 Thomas McSweeney 244 271 232 747 Stephanie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Brendan Lacy M.Arch Thesis.Indb
    The Green Scare: Radical environmental activism and the invention of “eco-terror- ism” in American superhero comics from 1970 to 1990 by Brendan James Lacy A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfi llment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Architecture Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2021 © Brendan James Lacy 2021 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required fi nal revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract American environmentalism became a recognizable social move- ment in the 1960s. In the following two decades the movement evolved to represent a diverse set of philosophies and developed new protest methods. In the early 1990s law enforcement and govern- ment offi cials in America, with support from extraction industries, created an image of the radical environmental movement as danger- ous “eco-terrorists.” Th e concept was deployed in an eff ort to de-val- ue the environmental movement’s position at a time of heightened environmental consciousness. With the concept in place members of the movement became easier to detain and the public easier to deter through political repression. Th e concept of “eco-terrorism” enters popular media relatively quickly indicated by the proliferation of superhero comics in the ear- ly 1990s that present villainous environmental activists as “eco-ter- rorists.” Th is imagery contrasts comics from 1970 which depicted superheroes as working alongside activists for the betterment of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feminization of Earth First!
    The Feminization of Earth First! Ms Magazine, May 1992 It is impossible to live in the redwood region of Northern CaMornia without being profoundly affected by the destruction of this once magnificent ecosys- tem. Miles and miles of clearcuts cover our bleeding hillsides. Ancient forests are being strip-logged to pay off corporate junk bonds. And bee-lines of log trucks fill our roads, heading to the sawmills with loads ranging from 1,000-year old redwoods, one tree trunk filling an entire logging truck, to six-inch diameter baby trees that are chipped for pulp. Less than 5% of the old growth redwood is left, and the ecosystem is disappearing even faster than the more widely known tropical rainforest. So it is not surprising that I, a lifetime activist, would become an environmentalist. What is surpris- ing is that I, a feminist, single mother and blue-collar worker, would end up in Earth Firstl, a "no compro- mise" direct action group with the reputation of being macho, beer-drinking eco-dudes. Little did I know that by combining the more feminine elements of col- lectivism and non-violence with the spunk and outra- geousness of Earth First!, we would spark a mass movement. And little did I know that I would pay for our success by being bombed and nearly killed, and subjected to a campaign of hatred and misogyny. I was attracted to Earth Firstl because they were the only ones willing to put their bodies in front of the TIMBER WARS The Feminization of Earth First! bulldozers and chainsaws to save the trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenpeace, Earth First! and the Earth Liberation Front: the Rp Ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008)
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2008 Greenpeace, Earth First! and The aE rth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher J. Covill University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Covill, Christopher J., "Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The rP ogression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America" (2008). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 93. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Greenpeace, Earth First! and The Earth Liberation Front: The Progression of the Radical Environmental Movement in America Christopher John Covill Faculty Sponsor: Professor Timothy Hennessey, Political Science Causes of worldwide environmental destruction created a form of activism, Ecotage with an incredible success rate. Ecotage uses direct action, or monkey wrenching, to prevent environmental destruction. Mainstream conservation efforts were viewed by many environmentalists as having failed from compromise inspiring the birth of radicalized groups. This eventually transformed conservationists into radicals. Green Peace inspired radical environmentalism by civil disobedience, media campaigns and direct action tactics, but remained mainstream. Earth First’s! philosophy is based on a no compromise approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Terrorism: an Overview
    Domestic Terrorism: An Overview August 21, 2017 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44921 Domestic Terrorism: An Overview Summary The emphasis of counterterrorism policy in the United States since Al Qaeda’s attacks of September 11, 2001 (9/11) has been on jihadist terrorism. However, in the last decade, domestic terrorists—people who commit crimes within the homeland and draw inspiration from U.S.-based extremist ideologies and movements—have killed American citizens and damaged property across the country. Not all of these criminals have been prosecuted under federal terrorism statutes, which does not imply that domestic terrorists are taken any less seriously than other terrorists. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) do not officially designate domestic terrorist organizations, but they have openly delineated domestic terrorist “threats.” These include individuals who commit crimes in the name of ideologies supporting animal rights, environmental rights, anarchism, white supremacy, anti-government ideals, black separatism, and beliefs about abortion. The boundary between constitutionally protected legitimate protest and domestic terrorist activity has received public attention. This boundary is highlighted by a number of criminal cases involving supporters of animal rights—one area in which specific legislation related to domestic terrorism has been crafted. The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (P.L. 109-374) expands the federal government’s legal authority to combat animal rights extremists who engage in criminal activity. Signed into law in November 2006, it amended the Animal Enterprise Protection Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-346). This report is intended as a primer on the issue, and four discussion topics in it may help explain domestic terrorism’s relevance for policymakers: Level of Activity.
    [Show full text]