Development of a Three-Dimensional Model of Sedimentary Texture in Valley-fill Deposits of Central Valley, California, USA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Development of a Three-Dimensional Model of Sedimentary Texture in Valley-fill Deposits of Central Valley, California, USA Development of a three-dimensional model of sedimentary texture in valley-fill deposits of Central Valley, California, USA Claudia C. Faunt & Kenneth Belitz & Randall T. Hanson Abstract A three-dimensional (3D) texture model was Introduction developed to help characterize the aquifer system of Central Valley, California (USA), for a groundwater flow For more than 50 years, California’s Central Valley model. The 52,000-km2 Central Valley aquifer system (Fig. 1) has been one of the most productive agricultural consists of heterogeneous valley-fill deposits. The texture regions in the world. In an area of about 52,000 km2, model was developed by compiling and analyzing Central Valley produces over 250 different crops, which approximately 8,500 drillers’ logs, describing lithologies had an estimated value of 17 billion dollars in 2002 (Great up to 950m below land surface. The lithologic descriptions Valley Center 2005, Fig. 1). The vast majority of crops is on the logs were simplified into a binary classification of irrigated and relies on surface-water diversions and coarse- and fine-grained. The percentage of coarse-grained groundwater pumping. Approximately three-quarters of sediment, or texture, was then computed for each 15-m depth the irrigated land in California and one-sixth of the interval. The model was developed by 3D kriging of the Nation’s irrigated land is in Central Valley (Bureau of percentage of coarse-grained deposits onto a 1.6-km spatial Reclamation 1994). About one-fifth of the Nation’s grid at 15-m depth intervals from land surface down to 700m pumped water is from its aquifers (Planert and Williams below land surface. The texture model reflects the known 1995). Because Central Valley contains so many com- regional, spatial, and vertical heterogeneity in the aquifer munities, industries, and ecosystems that depend directly system. The texture model correlates to sediment source or indirectly on groundwater, and because competition for areas, independently mapped geomorphic provinces, and available water is intensifying, there is a need to quantify factors affecting the development of alluvial fans, thus the region’s water resources and the trends affecting them demonstrating the utility of using tcdrillers’ logs as a source so that the potential for possible future water-use conflicts of lithologic information. The texture model is upscaled to a can be reduced or avoided. In response, the US Geological layered groundwater flow model for use in defining the Survey (USGS) is assessing the availability and use of hydraulic properties of the aquifer system. Central Valley’s groundwater resources. In order to understand the status of the groundwater Keywords USA . General hydrogeology . Geostatistics . system, the geologic framework, transmitting properties, Unconsolidated sediments and storage properties of the aquifer system are being assessed. The sand and gravel sediments underlying Central Valley make up the aquifer system. The primary purpose of this report is to assess the texture of the deposits in Central Valley (Fig. 1). Texture is defined as the percentage of coarse-grained sediment within a specified subsurface depth interval (Laudon and Belitz Received: 20 October 2008 /Accepted: 18 September 2009 1991). It is used as a basis for mapping the deposits. Published online: 29 October 2009 Although grain shape and sorting are often included as * Springer-Verlag 2009 texture characteristics, they were not included as part of the texture classification used in this study. Statistical Electronic supplementary material The online version of this techniques used to analyze spatial correlations, commonly article (doi:10.1007/s10040-009-0539-7) contains supplementary referred to as “geostatistics,” were used to develop a material, which is available to authorized users. spatial correlation model of the percentages of coarse- grained textures in Central Valley. The texture model C. C. Faunt ()) : K. Belitz : R. T. Hanson developed in this study was evaluated in the context of US Geological Survey, regional geomorphology and depositional setting of California Water Science Center, San Diego Projects Office, Central Valley. This evaluation is summarized in the 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92024, USA “ ” e-mail: [email protected] Results and Discussion section. The texture model was Tel.: +1-619-2256142 developed to provide information on the local-scale Fax: +1-619-225-6101 heterogeneity of the hydrogeologic framework and as a Hydrogeology Journal (2010) 18: 625–649 DOI 10.1007/s10040-009-0539-7 626 Fig. 1 Map of Central Valley showing major geomorphic provinces (modified from Davis et al. 1959; Olmsted and Davis 1961; Jennings 1977), alluvial fans of the San Joaquin Basin (Weissmann et al. 2005), and extent and thickness of Corcoran Clay (modified from Page 1986; Burow et al. 2004) basis for estimates of hydraulic properties. The texture this study follows the methods used in several previous model may be used to assess vertical and lateral hydraulic regional and site-specific investigations in the use of conductivity and storage property distributions for a sediment texture as a continuous variable in Central Valley numerical groundwater flow model of the region. (Laudon and Belitz 1991; Belitz et al. 1993; Burow et al. Traditionally, assessing the geologic framework focuses 2004; C. Brush, US Geological Survey, personal commu- on a description of the hydrogeologic or stratigraphic units nication, 2006; Phillips et al. 2007). that compose the aquifer system. For the purpose of Recently, a variety of geostatistical approaches have been estimating the groundwater storage capacity of the valley, applied to specific areas within Central Valley, although Davis et al. (1959, 1964)werethefirst to extensively study these methods are too detailed or generally not applicable to the texture and volume of deposits in Central Valley. a basin-scale approach. Phillips et al. (2007) used transition- Although a number of stratigraphic deposits have been probability geostatistical approaches (TProGS; Carle et al. identified (Tuscan, Tehama, and Tulare formations), their 1998) to derive the spatial distribution of sedimentary spatial character as well as their lateral and vertical extent is hydrofacies in about 17 km2 of the eastern San Joaquin poorly known. Because of the limited stratigraphic control, Valley near the Merced River (Fig. 2a); Burow et al. (2004) Hydrogeology Journal (2010) 18: 625–649 DOI 10.1007/s10040-009-0539-7 627 Fig. 2 a Map of Central Valley showing groundwater basins and subbasins, groups of basins and subbasins into spatial provinces and domains for textural analysis, and b distribution of wells used for mapping texture. Detailed description of the spatial provinces and domains are in Table 1. c Graph showing count of wells for each depth increment by domains developed a 50-km2 hydrofacies model near Modesto, and of freshwater in the entire 52,000-km2 area of Central Weissmann et al. (2002) constructed a sequence stratigraphic Valley. Later investigations, particularly those by Laudon model of the stream-dominated King’s River alluvial fan by and Belitz (1991), show that drillers’ logs can provide combining multiple adjacent individual TProGS realizations. valid texture information if the logs are classified and This study relies heavily on lithologic data from screened on the basis of the degree of detail in the log. In drillers’ logs, which are frequently assumed to be poor addition to regional studies, different depth intervals at sources of lithologic information. However, a number of specific sites ranging from 1,300 to 2,600 km2 in the previous studies in Central Valley have shown their utility west-central San Joaquin Valley have been studied if carefully used. Page (1986) utilized 685 geophysical (Prokopovich 1987; Belitz and Heimes 1990; Laudon logs to investigate the texture of deposits above the base and Belitz 1991; Belitz et al. 1993;C.Brush,US Hydrogeology Journal (2010) 18: 625–649 DOI 10.1007/s10040-009-0539-7 628 Fig. 2 (continued) Geological Survey, personal communication, 2006). In stratigraphy of Central Valley. Olmsted and Davis (1961) the Brush (C. Brush, US Geological Survey, personal wrote a comprehensive report on the geology, geomorphol- communication, 2006) study, they developed texture ogy, hydrogeology, and geologic history of the Sacramento maps for the semi-confined aquifer above the Corcoran Valley. Numerous other reports have also been written Clay (Fig. 1; further described in section Description of concerning specific areas or subjects within Central Valley. study area) for a 2,600 km2 area in the western San Central Valley is virtually one large sediment-filled Joaquin Valley. Burow et al. (2004) developed a 3D trough between the Coast Ranges and the Sierra Nevada. kriged estimate of the percentages of coarse-grained texture The Sierra Nevada, which forms the eastern side of the in the Modesto area in the eastern San Joaquin Valley. valley, is the eroded edge of a huge tilted block of Although that study was based on more than 3,500 drillers’ crystalline rock. The valley fill overlies a westward- logs, it only covered an area of 2,350 km2. sloping surface of basement rocks that are the subsurface continuation of the Sierra Nevada. Throughout the history of the Sierra Nevada, the crestal elevations of the southern Description of study area part of the range greatly exceed those of the northern part of the range (Farrar and Bertoldi 1988). Central Valley, also known as the Great Valley of A huge volume of sediments of deep marine, shallow California, is one of the more notable structural depres- marine, deltaic, and continental origin fill Central Valley sions in the world. For convenience in discussion, the (Farrar and Bertoldi 1988). The sequence of valley fill valley can be divided into two major parts: the northern deposits ranges in thickness from 0 along the western one third is known as the Sacramento Valley, the southern slopes of the Sierras on the eastern half of the valley to two thirds as the San Joaquin Valley.
Recommended publications
  • TYPICAL VALLEY INDIAN HOMES Vol. 2 No. 11 YUBA CITY, CALIFORNIA
    Vol. 2 No. 11 YUBA CITY, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 17 1961 TYPICAL VALLEY INDIAN HOMES SUTTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FALL MEETING OCTOBER 17, 1961 TUESDAY EVENING — 8 P.M. PLACE: Board of Supervisors Chambers County Office Building, 2nd Street PRESIDENT: Mrs. Florence Arritt PROGRAM CHAIRMAN: Randolph Schnabel PROGRAM SPEAKER: Waddell F. Smith President, National Pony Express Centennial Association TOPIC: The History of the Pony Express and Its Centennial BOARD OF DIRECTORS MINUTES October 5, 1961 The Board of Directors of Sutter County Historical Society met in regular session October 5, 1961 at 7:30 P.M. in the office of the County Superintendent. The meeting was called to order by Vice President, Mrs. Ida Littlejohn in the absence of the president, Mrs. Florence Arritt. Mrs. Arritt is on her vacation traveling in the southwest and visiting many spots of historic interest such as Tombstone, Arizona. The minutes of the July Board meeting and regular meeting were read and approved. The treasurer reported cash in the bank $737.33. Film Fund $447.00 and general fund $290.33. Mr. Ramey reported a membership of 111. Fifteen new members were secured at the county fair booth. The following bills were approved for payment: Valley Print Shop — Membership Cards, Stationery $41.70. County of Sutter — Bulletin pictures $6.20. Earl Ramey — Postage $3.50. Program Chairman, Randolph Schnabel reported the program had already been arranged for the annual dinner meeting in January. Mrs. Gibson presented an invitation to the Sutter County Historical Society to en- tertain the Symposium of Historical Societies of Northern California and Southern Oregon in the fall of 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Endangered Buena Vista Lake Shrews
    CONSERVATION OF ENDANGERED BUENA VISTA LAKE SHREWS (SOREX ORNATUS RELICTUS) THROUGH INVESTIGATION OF TAXONOMIC STATUS, DISTRIBUTION, AND USE OF NON-INVASIVE SURVEY METHODS Prepared by: Brian Cypher1, Erin Tennant2, Jesus Maldonado3, Larry Saslaw1, Tory Westall1, Jacklyn Mohay2, Erica Kelly1, and Christine Van Horn Job1 1California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program 2California Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 4 3Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute National Zoological Park June 16, 2017 Buena Vista Lake Shrew Conservation CONSERVATION OF ENDANGERED BUENA VISTA LAKE SHREWS (SOREX ORNATUS RELICTUS) THROUGH INVESTIGATION OF TAXONOMIC STATUS, DISTRIBUTION, AND USE OF NON-INVASIVE SURVEY METHODS Prepared by: Brian Cypher, Erin Tennant, Jesus Maldonado, Lawrence Saslaw, Tory Westall, Jacklyn Mohay, Erica Kelly, and Christine Van Horn Job California State University-Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 4 Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park CONTENTS Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Tuolumne River: Available Data Sources, Field Work Plan, and Initial Hydrology Analysis
    Upper Tuolumne River: Available Data Sources, Field Work Plan, and Initial Hydrology Analysis water hetch hetchy water & power clean water October 2006 Upper Tuolumne River: Available Data Sources, Field Work Plan, and Initial Hydrology Analysis Final Report Prepared by: RMC Water and Environment and McBain & Trush, Inc. October 2006 Upper Tuolumne River Section 1 Introduction Available Data Sources, Field Work Plan, and Initial Hydrology Analysis Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Section 2 Hetch Hetchy Facilities in the Study Area ............................................................. 4 Section 3 Preliminary Analysis of the Effects of Hetch Hetchy Project Facilities and Operations on Flow in Study Reaches ..................................................................................... 7 3.1 Analysis Approach ..................................................................................................... 7 3.2 The Natural Hydrograph........................................................................................... 10 3.3 Effects of Flow Regulation on Annual Hydrograph Components ............................. 12 3.3.1 Cherry and Eleanor Creeks.................................................................................................... 14 3.3.2 Tuolumne River...................................................................................................................... 17 3.4 Effects
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Features and Ground-Water Storage Capacity of the Sacramento Valley California
    Geologic Features and Ground-Water Storage Capacity of the Sacramento Valley California By F. H. OLMSTED and G. H. DAVIS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1497 Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of ff^ater Resources UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director Tlie TT.S. Geological Survey Library catalog card for this publication appears after page 241. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Abstract___________________________________________________ -_ 1 Introduction.-.--- .___-___________-___._--.______-----_ 5 Purpose and scope of the investigation.__________________ ______ 5 Location of area__-__-________-____________-_-___-_-__--____-_- 6 Development of ground water___________________-___-__ ___ __ 7 Acknowledgments....-------- ____________ _________________ 8 Well-numbering system..________________________________ _ 9 Geology--__--_--_--__----_--_-----____----_ --_ ___-__-- 10 Geomorphology_____________________________________________ 10 General features _______________________________________ 10 Mountainous region east of the Sacramento Valley...__________ 11 Sierra Nevada_______________________________________ 11 Cascade Range.._____________________-__--_-__-_---- 13 Plains and foothill region on the east side of the Sacramento Valley..__-_________-_.-____.___________ 14 Dissected alluvial uplands west of the Sierra
    [Show full text]
  • A Central Valley Resource Guide
    A Central Valley Resource Guide Capacity Building Resources for Nonprofit Organizations based in the Central Valley Sponsored by the Community Leadership Project and the Immigrant Legal Resource Center The Community Leadership Project is a joint effort funded by The David and Lucile Packard, James Irvine, and William and Flora Hewlett foundations to strengthen grassroots organizations that serve low-income people and communities of color. The project was underwritten with $10 million from the three foundations and targets small and midsized organizations in three geographic areas: the Greater San Francisco Bay Area, Central Coast and San Joaquin Valley. May 2010 Table of Contents Introduction..........................................................................................................................3 A Note from the ILRC on Capacity Building ........................................................................4 A Snapshot of Nonprofit Management ................................................................................5 Leadership...........................................................................................................................6 Executive Coaching.............................................................................................................9 Fundraising Development....................................................................................................11 Financial Management and Planning ..................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of a Barrier Jet in the Sacramento Valley Using the Weather Event Simulator (WES)
    An Examination of a Barrier Jet in the Sacramento Valley Using the Weather Event Simulator (WES) James Mathews, WFO Sacramento, CA & John Juskie, WFO Sacramento, CA Introduction Barrier winds or barrier jets are common occurrences in the Sacramento valley due to the orientation of the topography. The Sacramento valley is bounded by the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the east and the coastal range to the west. These mountains often cause terrain-induced winds in the Sacramento valley. As an example, onshore flow from the Pacific Ocean causes air to be forced through the gap in the coastal range mountains called the Golden Gate. Once the air passes through the Carquinez Strait east of the Golden Gate, it spreads out as it reaches the valley and results in a southerly wind direction for the Sacramento valley. Usually, these wind speeds are not strong enough to cause significant problems. However, on occasion, southerly winds can result in the formation of the southerly barrier jet along side the Sierra Nevada Mountains (Parish, 1982). Given unique circumstances, wind speeds can become significant to the public and wind advisories, high wind warnings, or Red Flag Warnings are issued to highlight this phenomenon. Staudenmaier (1994) discussed the formation of a northerly barrier jet and the implications to extreme fire behavior. Staudenmaier offered three conditions forecasters should examine for the potential development of a northerly barrier jet: (1) a sufficiently deep surface or near-surface based layer (at least 150 mbs deep) of northeasterly flow over the Sacramento valley for at least 6 hours, (2) strong stability as shown by the Oakland, CA (KOAK) sounding extending from around 800 mbs to at least as high as the terrain and, (3) enhancement of gusty surface winds if the stable layer caps a slightly less stable layer allowing for momentum transfer to the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Mendota Pool Bypass and Reach 2B Improvement Project Draft EIS/R
    Draft Mendota Pool Bypass and Reach 2B Improvements Project Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report SCH # 2009072044 June 2015 The San Joaquin River Restoration Program is a comprehensive long-term effort to restore flows to the San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the confluence of Merced River and restore a self-sustaining Chinook salmon fishery in the river while reducing or avoiding adverse water supply impacts from Interim and Restoration flows. Mission Statements The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American Public. The California State Lands Commission serves the people of California by providing stewardship of the lands, waterways, and resources entrusted to its care through economic development, protection, preservation, and restoration. Executive Summary INTRODUCTIONAND BACKGROUND Introduction and Background The Mendota Pool Bypass and Reach 2B Improvements Project (Project) includes the construction, operation, and maintenance of the Mendota Pool Bypass and improvements in the San Joaquin River channel in Reach 2B (Figure S-1). The Project consists of a floodplain width that conveys at least 4,500 cubic feet per second (cfs), a method Mendota Pool to bypass Restoration Flows around Mendota Pool, and a method to deliver water to Mendota Pool. The Project footprint and vicinity (Figure S-2) extend from approximately 0.3 mile above the Chowchilla Bifurcation Structure to approximately 1.0 mile below the Mendota Dam. The Project footprint comprises the area that could be directly affected by the Project. The Project study area or “Project area” includes areas directly and indirectly affected by the Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Westlands Water District – Warren Act Contract for Conveyance of Kings River Flood Flows in the San Luis Canal
    Final Environmental Assessment Westlands Water District – Warren Act Contract for Conveyance of Kings River Flood Flows in the San Luis Canal EA-11-002 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region South-Central California Area Office Fresno, California January 2012 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Table of Contents Page Section 1 Purpose and Need for Action ....................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................. 1 1.3 Scope ..................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Reclamation’s Legal and Statutory Authorities and Jurisdiction Relevant to the Proposed Federal Action.............................................. 2 1.5 Potential Issues...................................................................................... 3 Section 2 Alternatives Including the Proposed Action............................... 5 2.1 No Action Alternative ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Hotspots of the Northern Sacramento Valley 15 Miles North to Red Bluff ° Upper Bidwell Park !!# !!# 6 Duncan Wildwood !Hcorning ")2 East Ave
    Birding Hotspots of the Northern Sacramento Valley 15 miles north to Red Bluff ° Upper Bidwell Park !!# !!# 6 Duncan Wildwood !HCorning ")2 East Ave. Manzanita MainSt Corning 3 ")1 Samuel Ayer/ ") Sacramento River NWR - Bruce Dog Island Park South Ave City Main St Rio Vista Unit ¤£99 Breckenridge of 32 ¤£ Bruce Rd City of Antelope Chico §¨¦I-5 ¤£32 Red £99 Skyway ° Dominic S ¤ S a River Rd. a c ° Bluff c r Morrow r ° a a Genetic Resource & m 11 m Conservation Center Cramer ee n County Rd 200 e tto k o R a R iiv L v ee r e r t t u County Rd 200 I-5 B §¨¦ Sacramento River NWR- k East Ave 6 k k c ")4 Pine Creek Unit ")Bruce Rd e e la Hamilton City ee B Orland ")5 ¤£32 CCrr !H tet e 32 t ¤£ !H t !H uu Black Butte Rd Chico BB ¤£99W ")7 W Sacramento Ave Chico ¤£45 10 11 ")8 ") ") Skyway ")9 Chico River Rd ")12 Oroville-Chico Hwy Sacramento River NWR- ¤£191 Ord Bend Unit River Rd Durham Dayton Hwy ¤£70 ")15 14 Rd 32 Road 33 ") Ord Ferry Road ")17 Grainland Rd ¤£149 Road R ")16 Table # # Llano Seco Unit - Midway !! !! Road WW Mountain ")13 Steve Thompson 18 Road 39 North Central Valley ") Wildlife Mg't Area ¤£99 ")19 Seven Mile Lane Cottonwood Rd. Upper Butte Nelson Rd £162 Basin WA - ")20 ¤ Llano Seco Unit !H ¤£162 Nelson Rd Willows Upper T Road V h 162 !H Aguas Frias Rd ¤£ Butte e Road WW r m Oroville Road 57 Road P Rd 57 Basin WA - Oroville Rd Rd W l Howard i National Wildlife Refuge Road 59 t Larkin Rd Slough Unit ")21 o 22 ¤£162 Af terbay ") Road 60 State Wildlife Area Road 61 !HButte City Oroville Hamilton WA Sacramento State Park 24 River NWR- ") Road Z 23 Packer Unit ") Afton Rd City Park Upper Afton Afton Blvd(RdY) Road 68 !H Butte Roads Sacramento PrincetonPrinceton Basin WA - NWR Little Dry Gravel Creek Unit Butler Rd Adobe Rd !H Gridley Colusa Hwy Gridley Paved Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Cenozoic Evolution of the Tuolumne River, Central Sierra Nevada, California
    The late Cenozoic evolution of the Tuolumne River, central Sierra Nevada, California N. KING HUBER U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 ABSTRACT Rancheria Mountain suggests that uplift had ancient prevolcanic channel of the Tuolumne been underway for some time before the vol- River. The volcanic rocks also help to date that Erosional remnants of volcanic rock depos- canic infilling. This timing is compatible with channel and make its reconstruction useful for ited in a lO-m.y.-old channel of the Tuolumne evidence from the upper San Joaquin River. estimating both Sierran tilt and the amount and River permit its partial reconstruction. Pro- Hetch Hetchy Valley on the Tuolumne is a rate of postvolcanic incision of the Tuolumne jection of the reconstructed channel west to much "fresher" glaciated valley than is River. Comparisons can then be made with sim- the Central Valley and east to the range crest, Yosemite Valley. Hetch Hetchy was filled to ilar estimates from the upper San Joaquin River. together with several assumptions about the the brim with glacial ice as recently as All data in this study were derived from topo- position of the hinge line and changes in 15,000-20,000 yr ago (Tioga glaciation), graphic maps at a scale of 1:62,500 with contour channel gradient, allows estimates of the whereas Yosemite Valley probably has not intervals of 80 or 100 ft, and all calculations amount of uplift at the range crest during the been filled for 750,000 yr or more (Sherwin therefore were made in United States customary past 10 m.y.
    [Show full text]
  • Promote a Positive Brand for Central
    Board of Directors Meeting Friday, June 13, 2008 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Location: Madera Center, SCCCD – 30277 Avenue 12 Madera, California 93638 AGENDA 10:00 I. Convene Meeting & Chair Conway Introductory Remarks 10:05 II. Self-Introductions Board & Public 10:15 III. Review and Approval of Minutes C. Conway • February 8, 2008 • April 10, 2008 K-12 Special Session 10:20 V. Priority Work Group Updates • Water Quality, Supply & Reliability Ray Watson (10:20-10:35) • Transportation (10:35-10:45) Frank Bigelow ⎯ HSR Update & Legislation (10:45- Carrie Pourvahidi, HSRA, 11:00) Peter Weber • Air Quality (11:00-11:15) Peter Weber 11:15 VI. • K-12 Special Session Report on Outcomes and Next Steps Dr. Lee Andersen 12:00 Lunch Recess • California Travel & Tourism Caroline Beteta, CTTC Commission Update 1:00 VII. In Depth Work Group Report Stan Simpson, Paul • Economic Development Saldana, Bobby Kahn 1:45 VIII. Follow-Up Items from Feb. Meeting • Blueprint Update (1:45-2:15) Barry Hibbard • UC Merced Medical School Update Larry Salinas, Brandy (2:15-2:25) Nikaido, UC Merced 2:25 IX. Report from the Secretariat Ashley Swearengin • Partnership Sustainability • Communications & Leg Affairs Update • Seed Grant Summary Report • Work Group/Seed Grant Reports – comments and suggestions from the board 2:45 X. Annual Summit and Report David Hosley 2:50 XI. Public Comment Public 3:00 XII. Adjournment C. Conway This page has been left blank intentionally. 1 Meeting of the Board of Directors Friday, February 8, 2008 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    [Show full text]