Sixth Overview of Housing Exclusion in Europe 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sixth Overview of Housing Exclusion in Europe 2021 SIXTH OVERVIEW OF HOUSING EXCLUSION IN EUROPE 2021 Fondation Abbé Pierre - FEANTSA THIS IS A JOINT PUBLICATION BY FEANTSA AND THE ABBÉ PIERRE FOUNDATION COORDINATION ACKNOW‑ # Chloé Serme-Morin # Sarah Coupechoux LEDGEMENTS CONTRIBUTORS # Maria-José Aldanas # Manuel Domergue # Freek Spinnewijn # Robbie Stakelum # Noria Derdek # Pauline Portefaix # Samara Jones WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO THANK THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE WITH CONTENT AND DISTRIBUTION # FEANTSA and FAP's teams and communication officers # The FEANTSA Board of Directors and President Kjell Larsson and FEANTSA member organisations # All the people and partners who contributed by questionnaire, interview or testimonies to the report, in particular Jarda & Kateřina (Czech Republic), Tommi & Tiina (Finland), Gabriel and Marco (Italy), Kirstie & LM (Ireland), Nathalie and the Itinova discussion group (France), Maelys Garcia (ATD Quart-Monde), Melanie Schmit (HF4Y, Netherlands), Juha Kahila, Juha Soivio, Saija Turunen, Taina Hytönen (Y-Foundation, Finland), Katarzyna Przybylska (Habitat for Humanity, Poland), Agnieszka Sikora (Foundation ‘po DRUGIE’, Poland), Brian Doree & Tim McQuade (Depaul, Northern Ireland), Lisa O'Brien & Aisling Reidy (Focus Ireland, Ireland), Barbara Unterlerchner & Anja Christanell (Neunerhaus, Austria) Kirsten Asmussen (Project Outside – Udenfor, Denmark), Liv Kristensen & Hermund Urstad (Hubsbanken, Norway), Wayne Stanley (Simon Communities, Ireland), Roberta Pascucci & Caterina Cortese (fioPSD, Italy) Ursula Jörg (Caritas-Förderzentrum St. Christophorus, Einrichtung der Wohnungslosenhilfe, Germany). TRANSLATION & PROOFREADING # Elizabeth Hayes and Tara Horan # Proofreading by Suzannah Young GRAPHIC DESIGN # Genaro Studio MAY 2021 SIXTH OVERVIEW OF HOUSING EXCLUSION IN EUROPE 2021 EDITO- RIAL or more than a year now, the pandemic in danger with their transition to independence has been playing havoc with our compromised. solidarity and social protection For the European Union and Member States, 2021 systems – already undermined by the will be a pivotal year. The emergency measures 2008 financial crisis which exposed taken at the outset of the pandemic and regularly glaring inequalities. The pandemic has hit the F extended to limit social and health disasters poorest households hardest, particularly those – freeing up accommodation, moratoria on in insecure employment and young people who evictions, etc. – are temporary in nature. Without are struggling to find their place in Europe's more long-term provisions to extend these exclusionary housing markets. protections, Europe will face a wave of poverty Approaching housing in strictly material terms with a growing number of people at risk of – as a financial asset and not as a fundamental losing their home or accommodation when the right – has made it a key driver of inequality measures come to an end. throughout the pandemic. While for some The previous editions of this report have shown housing represents the first line of defence that ending homelessness is not a utopian against the pandemic by enabling self-isolation dream if we use the Housing First approach and social distancing, for others it represents going forward, and that economic recovery can a danger when it is unfit, unsuitable and be built on effective, inclusive and sustainable overcrowded. For those deprived of a decent, regulation of housing markets. For the first adequate and affordable home of their own, time, the European Union seems to have the the pandemic has had particularly drastic necessary tools to address extreme poverty and consequences. housing exclusion through, for example, the Despite significant mobilisation of services European Platform on Combating Homelessness for the most disadvantaged along with the which is due to be launched in June 2021. Now introduction of several emergency measures to more than ever, implementing the universal alleviate the effects of the recession, extreme and fundamental right to dignified, adequate poverty and homelessness have gained ground and affordable housing has become an urgent and are affecting new segments of the population. necessity. Every effort must be made to turn this Public funds have not always been adequate goal into reality. to meet need, abandoning the most vulnerable among us, as is evidenced by the queues for food banks. Young people in particular have been hit Freek Spinnewijn by the economic consequences of the pandemic, Director, FEANTSA hindered in pursuing training or education, in accessing employment, in finding housing and Christophe Robert in simply living their lives. Europe's youth are Managing Director, Abbé Pierre Foundation Photo : Ljubisa Danilovic | Fondation Abbé Pierre CONTENTS # CHAP. 1 HOMELESSNESS IN EUROPE: THE LEGACY OF A DECADE-LONG SOCIAL EMERGENCY AND A YEAR-LONG PANDEMIC. 9 1. A cementing of the worsening trends in homelessness that we have witnessed over the past decade ....................................................12 2. Very worrying prospects in the wake of the pandemic and ballooning poverty levels in Europe .......................................................................15 3. Policies to fight homelessness in Europe: what we have learned from the pandemic ......................................................................................................16 4. European momentum and recommendations ....................................................18 # CHAP. 2 HOUSING EXCLUSION AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE: INDEPENDENCE INTERRUPTED BY COVID-19 ................... 29 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................31 1. Lockdown combined with housing exclusion: young people on the front lines of Europe's dysfunctional housing markets ......................34 The family home: pitfall or privilege? .............................................................34 The difficulty young people face when accessing housing .....................37 The harmful consequences of worsening housing conditions for young people ...................................................................................................41 2. Housing exclusion as an obstacle to independence, personal development and integration ................................................................47 Inadequate public funding to fight poverty among young people. 47 Negative effects on potential integration ......................................................51 The consequences of the pandemic on worsening housing difficulties and integration for young people ..............................53 3. Investing in young people's future by facilitating access to housing and repairing safety nets ..........................................................................................57 Developing housing solutions adapted to the most vulnerable. 57 Ensuring basic resources and a safety net for all .......................................62 Conclusions and Recommendations. .66 # CHAP. 3 EUROPEAN INDEX OF HOUSING EXCLUSION 2021 .......................................................77 Opening remarks .............................................................................................................. 80 1. The price of housing – ten years of steadily escalating housing costs ........81 2. Unfit housing and poor living conditions – people experiencing housing exclusion worst affected by Covid-19 ...................................................87 3. Social factors aggravating housing difficulties ..................................................93 4. Close-ups on housing exclusion: Belgium, Hungary, Lithuania, Finland ..................................................................100 # CHAP. 4 LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS: RENT REGULATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION ...................................................................121 Introduction ........................................................................................................................122 - Germany – a unique model ..................................................................................125 - Rent controls in France ........................................................................................ 128 - The collective bargaining system in Sweden ................................................. 129 - Denmark – a complex system of rent controls ..............................................130 - Indicative or controlled rents in the Brussels region ................................... 133 - Catalonia’s new rent control system .................................................................134 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................136 APPENDICES ....................................................................................................... 138 HOUSING EXCLUSION IN EUROPE: KEY STATISTICS ........................................................................................... 152 8 # CHAP. 1 HOMELESSNESS IN EUROPE THE LEGACY OF A DECADE-LONG SOCIAL EMERGENCY AND A YEAR-LONG PANDEMIC 9 # CHAP. 1 HOMELESSNESS IN EUROPE THE LEGACY OF A DECADE-LONG SOCIAL EMERGENCY AND A YEAR-LONG PANDEMIC revious editions of this report highlighted the dramatic increase in homelessness over the preceding decade as well as how the profile of people excluded from housing markets has diversified. In 2019, FEANTSA and the Abbé Pierre Foundation estimated the minimum number of homeless people sleeping
Recommended publications
  • Ending Homelessness in Finland with Housing First CEO Juha Kaakinen OECD Workshop, Paris 25.11.2019 1 Homelessness in Finland 1987- 18000 2027 16000
    Ending Homelessness in Finland with Housing First CEO Juha Kaakinen OECD Workshop, Paris 25.11.2019 1 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 2000 4000 6000 8000 2 0 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1987 in Finland Homelessness 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2027 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 - 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Homelessness in Finland • 5.482 in 2018 (0,1% of the population) • 4.882 single homeless persons (down by 39% since 2008) • 600 in families • Wide definition of homelessness: 70−75% living temporarily with friends and relatives • Low amount of rough sleeping 3 (283) Homelessness in Finland • Long-term homelessness has decreased by 2.435 persons, down by 68% • Its relative share of all single homeless from 45% to 24% since 2008 • The number of long-term homeless 1.162 (2018) 4 Phases of Homelessness Policy in Finland • 1985─2007: Several National Programmes • Welfare legislation • Building new social housing (preventing family homelessness) • Supported housing as part of a staircase model • 2008─2015: Ending Longterm Homelessness • Housing First as the main principle • From temporary to permanent housing • 2016─2019: Programme for Prevention 5 Housing options for Homeless persons in Helsinki Year Supported Independent Hostels and Social housing housing rental shelters apartments apartments 1985 127 65 2.121 35.404 2008 552 2.033 558 68.881 2016 1.309 2.433 52 67.764 6 Government Programme 2019: Eradicating Homelessness within Two Government Terms • Halving homelessness during the government term and eradicating homelessness within two government terms by 2027.
    [Show full text]
  • European Homelessness and COVID-19 3
    European Homelessness and COVID 19 Nicholas Pleace Isabel Baptista Lars Benjaminsen Volker Busch Geertsema Eoin O’Sullivan Nóra Teller Acknowledgements This report draws on research, interviewing homelessness service providers and reviewing available information, conducted within the home countries of the members of the European Observatory on Homelessness (EoH): Isabel Baptista (Portugal); Lars Benjaminsen (Denmark); Volker Busch-Geertsema (Germany); Eoin O’Sullivan (Ireland), Nóra Teller (Hungary) and, in 2020, prior to leaving the EU, the UK (Nicholas Pleace). The most recent EoH comparative research for the 10th report in the series, exploring staffing in homelessness services in Europe1, was conducted as COVID-19 was causing the first waves of lockdowns. The result of this work, which covered the immediate impacts of COVID-19 on homelessness services in: Belgium; Croatia; the Czech Republic; Denmark; Finland; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Italy; the Netherlands; Poland; Portugal; Slovenia; Spain; and the UK, are also drawn upon on here. The report also draws on a range of other resources, including FEANTSA’s own data collection, analysis by the Deputy Director, Ruth Owen, and inputs from the Director, Freek Spinnewijn. As always, the work of EoH presented here benefits from Mike Allen’s (Focus Ireland) input and comments. Sources from outside Europe are also used in trying to understand and consider the possible long-term effects of COVID-19 on homelessness and housing exclusion as the pandemic continues to unfold. People working in homelessness services across Europe also supported the research at an extremely challenging time. Our sincere thanks are due to all those who contributed both directly and indirectly to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness 9
    This is a repository copy of The Regulation and Quality of Homelessness Services : EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness 9. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/158131/ Version: Published Version Monograph: Pleace, Nicholas orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-2667, Baptista, Isabel, Benjaminsen, Lars et al. (1 more author) (2020) The Regulation and Quality of Homelessness Services : EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness 9. Research Report. FEANTSA , Brussels. Reuse ["licenses_typename_other" not defined] Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ European Observatory on Homelessness The Regulation and Quality of Homelessness Services 9 EOH Comparative Studies on Homelessness Brussels 2019 Acknowledgements This research was based on questionnaire responses from 16 European Union member states. Each questionnaire was completed by an expert in homelessness, with additional expertise being drawn upon where necessary. Our sincere thanks to everyone who supported this piece of research. It is not possible to include every detail of the information collected through the questionnaires, though the authors have worked to try to ensure equal representation of each country and every effort has been made to report the information shared with us accurately. Readers should note that there
    [Show full text]
  • Ph4.3 Key Characteristics of Social Rental Housing
    OECD Affordable Housing Database – http://oe.cd/ahd OECD Directorate of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs - Social Policy Division PH4.3 KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF SOCIAL RENTAL HOUSING Definitions and methodology This indicator presents information from the OECD Questionnaire on Social and Affordable Housing on the definition and characteristics of social rental housing programmes, and provides details on the different methods used to define rent levels and rent increases, the eligibility of beneficiaries, and dwelling allocation. For the purpose of this indicator, the following definition of social rental housing was used: residential rental accommodation provided at sub-market prices and allocated according to specific rules (Salvi del Pero, A. et al., 2016). Based on this definition, surveyed countries provided information on a range of different supply-side measures in the rental sector, see Table 4.3a below. Key findings In total, 32 countries report the existence of some form of social rental housing. Definitions of social rental housing differ across countries (see Table PH4.3.1). Further, many countries report having more than one type of rental housing that responds to administrative procedures (as opposed to market mechanisms), with different characteristics in terms of providers, target groups and financing arrangements. The complexity of the social housing sector in some countries is due in part to its long history, which has seen different phases and different stakeholders involved over time. There are also a number of regional specificities that affect the size and functioning of the social housing stock across countries. For instance, in most Central and Eastern European countries (Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and the Slovak Republic), the social rental housing stock is quite small (see indicator PH4.2), while there is a much larger share of the population that owns their dwellings outright, as a result of the mass housing privatisation since 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeless Bill Fo Rights
    Advocating for the rights of homeless people The Homeless Bill of Rights User Guide A handbook for social actors to engage with the Homeless Bill of Rights The Homeless Bill of Rights User Guide ABOUT THE EUROPEAN CAMPAIGN ........................................................................................... 1 POLICY CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................... 2 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS THE HOMELESS BILL OF RIGHTS?.................................................................................... 3 ENDORSING THE HOMELESS BILL OF RIGTHS .............................................................................. 6 DIRECT ENDORSEMENT BY THE MUNICIPALITY: ....................................................................... 7 PARTICIPATORY PROCESS OF ACTORS AT LOCAL LEVEL: .................................................... 7 IMPLEMENTING THE HOMELESS BILL OF RIGHTS ......................................................................... 10 INVOLVING THE HOMELESS PEOPLE THEMSELVES ..................................................................... 10 MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BILL ...................................................................... 10 CONTACT ..................................................................................................................................... 11 The Homeless
    [Show full text]
  • Cityscape: a Journal of Policy Development and Research • Volume 22, Number 2 • 2020 Cityscape 1 U.S
    A Journal of Policy Development and Research TWO ESSAYS ON UNEQUAL GROWTH IN HOUSING VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2 • 2020 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research Managing Editor: Mark D. Shroder Associate Editor: Michelle P. Matuga Advisory Board Dolores Acevedo-Garcia Brandeis University Ira Goldstein The Reinvestment Fund Richard K. Green University of Southern California Mark Joseph Case Western Reserve University Matthew E. Kahn University of California, Los Angeles C. Theodore Koebel Virginia Tech Jens Ludwig University of Chicago Mary Pattillo Northwestern University Carolina Reid University of California Patrick Sharkey New York University Cityscape A Journal of Policy Development and Research Two Essays on Unequal Growth in Housing Volume 22, Number 2 • 2020 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research The goal of Cityscape is to bring high-quality original research on housing and community development issues to scholars, government officials, and practitioners. Cityscape is open to all relevant disciplines, including architecture, consumer research, demography, economics, engineering, ethnography, finance, geography, law, planning, political science, public policy, regional science, sociology, statistics, and urban studies. Cityscape is published three times a year by the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Subscriptions are available at no charge and single copies at a nominal fee. The journal is also available on line at huduser.gov/periodicals/cityscape.html. PD&R welcomes submissions to the Refereed Papers section of the journal. Our referee process is double blind and timely, and our referees are highly qualified.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Housing in Europe
    Social Housing in Europe Edited by Christine Whitehead and Kathleen Scanlon Published by LSE London, London School of Economics and Political Science July 2007 ISBN 978-0-85328-100-9 Contents Foreword 4 John Hills Preface 1. Introduction and Key Findings 5 The idea for this book came from a multidisciplinary group of French aca- 2. Social Housing in Europe 8 demics based at different Paris universities that was organised by the GIS Christine Whitehead & Kathleen Scanlon Réseau Socio-Economie de l'Habitat network, which receives support from the PUCA (Plan Urbain Construction Amenagement, the Research Office of 3. Social Housing in Austria 35 the Ministry of Capital Works and Housing). Over the course of the last 18 Christoph Reinprecht months, the group has met five times (in Brussels, Paris, London and 4. Social Housing in Denmark 44 Berlin). Each meeting was devoted to discussion of different issues related to social housing, and local organisations or government bodies often pro- Kathleen Scanlon & Hedvig Vestergaard vided some financial support. One of these seminars, generously supported 5. Social Housing in England 54 by the Department of Communities and Local Government, was held in London in September 2006. Christine Whitehead 6.Social Housing in France 70 We would like to thank the authors of the reports for their hard work and patience. We would also like to thank all those who participated in the Claire Levy-Vroelant & Christian Tutin events who offered helpful comments and advice. They included: Jane Ball, 7. Social Housing in Germany 90 Nathalie Boccadoro, Nick Bulloch, Claire Carriou, Darinka Czischke, Benoit Filippi, Laurent Ghekiere, Christine Lelevrier, Peter Malpass, Alan Murie, Christiane Droste & Thomas Knorr-Siedow Jean-Pierre Schaefer, Maxime Chodorge, Marc Uhry and Mark Stephens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish National Programme to Reduce Long-Term Homelessness
    PEER REVIEW IN SOCIAL PROTECTION AND SOCIAL INCLUSION 2010 THE FINNISH NATIONAL PROGRAMME TO REDUCE LONG-TERM HOMELESSNESS HELSINKI, 2–3 DECEMBER 2010 SYNTHESIS REPORT On behalf of the European Commission Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion PEER REVIEW IN SOCIAL PROTECTION AND SOCIAL INCLUSION 2010 THE FINNISH NATIONAL PROGRAMME TO REDUCE LONG-TERM HOMELEssNEss VOLKER BUSCH-GEERTSEMA AssOCIATION FOR INNOVATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH AND SOCIAL PLANNING (GISS, BREMEN, GERMANY) HELSINKI, 2–3 DECEMBER 2010 SYNTHESIS REPORT On behalf of the European Commission Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion This publication is supported for under the European Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity (2007–2013). This programme is managed by the Directorate-Generale for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission. It was established to financially support the implementation of the objectives of the European Union in the employment and social affairs area, as set out in the Social Agenda, and thereby contribute to the achievement of the Lisbon Strategy goals in these fields. The seven-year Programme targets all stakeholders who can help shape the development of appropriate and effective employment and social legislation and policies, across the EU-27, EFTA-EEA and EU candidate and pre-candidate countries. PROGRESS mission is to strengthen the EU contribution in support of Member States’ commitments and efforts to create more and better jobs and to build a more cohesive society. To that effect, PROGRESS will be instrumental in: • providing analysis and policy advice on PROGRESS policy areas; • monitoring and reporting on the implementation of EU legislation and policies in PROGRESS policy areas; • promoting policy transfer, learning and support among Member States on EU 2 objectives and priorities; and • relaying the views of the stakeholders and society at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents De Travail 2008
    156 DOCUMENTS DE TRAVAIL 2008 THE INED RESEARCH ON HOMELESSNESS, 1993-2008 Volume 1 Volume edited by Maryse Marpsat Papers translated from the French by Godfrey Rogers THE INED RESEARCH ON HOMELESSNESS, 1993-2008 Volume 1 Volume edited by Maryse Marpsat Papers translated from the French by Godfrey Rogers INSTITUT NATIONAL D'ETUDES DEMOGRAPHIQUES ETABLISSEMENT PUBLIC SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNOLOGIQUE • 133, BOULEVARD DAVOUT 75980 PARIS CEDEX 20 FRANCE TEL. 33 (1) 56 06 20 00 • FAX 33 (1) 56 06 21 99 2 Introduction:The INED research on homelessness (1993-2008) The research on homeless people undertaken by INED began as a part of the larger project dealing with the victims of housing exclusion conducted by the 'homelessness' group of the Conseil National de l'Information Statistique (CNIS, 1996). This research is centred on two quantitative sample surveys to which are added a number of other quantitative and qualitative investigations. The surveys were carried out by the Service des Enquêtes et de l'Observation of INED and are a major methodological innovation in that they led to development of a method for obtaining a representative sample of homeless users of shelters and soup kitchen services. The survey is an adaptation to the French context of the surveys conducted for a number of years in the United States at local and national levels. CNIS and the development of French quantitative research on the homeless CNIS (Conseil National de l'Information Statistique - National Council for Statistical Information) provides a forum for providers and users of official statistics. As coordinator of the French government's statistical activities, it prepares a medium-term program and, within that framework, an annual program incorporating all available data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Profiles of Homeless People
    EN_2004WG2_People 29/04/05 14:20 Page 1 European Observatory on Homelessness ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS IN EUROPE The series ‘Addressing Homelessness in Europe’ is the result of the work of the three thematic research groups of FEANTSA’s European Observatory on Homelessness that have been set up to cover the following themes: ■ The changing role of the state ■ The changing profiles of homeless people ■ The changing role of service provision The changing profiles of homeless people: Homelessness in the Written Press: a Discourse Analysis is based on five articles produced by the National Correspondents of the European Observatory on Homelessness. The full articles can be downloaded from FEANTSA’s website www.feantsa.org The changing profiles The work of FEANTSA’s European Observatory on Homelessness is supported financially by the European Commission. of homeless people: Homelessness in the Written Press: ISBN: 907552935X a Discourse Analysis Henk Meert, Pedro Cabrera, Ivan Christensen, Inger Koch-Nielsen, Roland Maas and Elisabeth Maurel November 2004 European Federation of National Associations Working with the Homeless Fédération Européenne d'Associations Nationales Travaillant avec les Sans-Abri 194, Chaussée de Louvain ■ 1210 Brussels ■ Belgium ■ Tel.: + 32 2 538 66 69 ■ Fax: +32 2 539 41 74 ■ [email protected] ■ www.feantsa.org European Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless European Observatory on Homelessness ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS IN EUROPE The changing profiles of homeless people: Homelessness in the Written Press: a Discourse Analysis By Henk Meert, Pedro Cabrera, Ivan Christensen, Inger Koch-Nielsen, Roland Maas and Elisabeth Maurel November 2004 European Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless European Observatory on Homelessness The changing profiles of homeless people- Homelessness in the Written Press Contents Introduction: Discourse analysis and the societal dimension of constructing profiles of the homeless ......
    [Show full text]
  • Y Foundation Finland
    Y-FOUNDATION 1 (3) Pitkänsillanranta 3 A, PL 322 00531 Helsinki, Finland Designing and implementing effective human rights-based housing strategies: answers to the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to housing - Finland and the Y-Foundation Briefly about the work of the Y-Foundation The Finnish Y-Foundation offers rental accommodation for people who are having difficulties in finding a home for themselves. The Y-Foundation operates in over 50 cities and municipalities with over 16 000 apartments. Apartments are acquired through the purchase of individual homes in housing companies and by developing apartment blocks for rental purposes all over Finland. The capital region as well as other major cities and areas of growth are particular areas of focus when it comes to procuring accommodation. The subletting of individual apartments is at the core of the foundation’s activities, and the majority of apartments are sublet to municipalities, parishes or to other partners. In addition to subletting, the Y-Foundation also owns apartments, mostly in the capital region, which it rents out directly to applicants. Residents are selected based on the applicant’s need for housing and the applicants for the apartments come mainly through our partners. In addition to purchasing individual apartments, the Y-Foundation also develops apartment blocks. Construction takes place based on local needs and wishes. Construction projects have included both regular rental accommodation as well as units for special groups allowing for support services. The foundation is actively involved as a national developer of the Housing First principle, which is fast gaining ground especially in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Homelessness Laws
    The Forum September 2020 Is a House Always a Home?: A Survey of Homelessness Laws Marlei English J.D. Candidate, SMU Dedman School of Law, 2021; Staff Editor for the International Law Review Association Find this and additional student articles at: https://smulawjournals.org/ilra/forum/ Recommended Citation Marlei English, Is a House Always a Home?: A Survey of Homelessness Laws (2020) https://smulawjournals.org/ilra/forum/. This article is brought to you for free and open access by The Forum which is published by student editors on The International Law Review Association in conjunction with the SMU Dedman School of Law. For more information, please visit: https://smulawjournals.org/ilra/. Is a House Always a Home?: A Survey of Homelessness Laws By: Marlei English1 March 6, 2020 Homelessness is a plague that spares no country, yet not a single country has cured it. The type of legislation regarding homelessness in a country seems to correlate with the severity of its homelessness problem. The highly-variative approaches taken by each country when passing their legislation can be roughly divided into two categories: aid-based laws and criminalization laws. Analyzing how these homelessness laws affect the homeless community in each country can be an important step in understanding what can truly lead to finding the “cure” for homelessness rather than just applying temporary fixes. I. Introduction to the Homelessness Problem Homelessness is not a new issue, but it is a current, and pressing issue.2 In fact, it is estimated that at least 150 million individuals are homeless.3 That is about two percent of the population on Earth.4 Furthermore, an even larger 1.6 billion individuals may be living without adequate housing.5 While these statistics are startling, the actual number of individuals living without a home could be even larger because these are just the reported and observable numbers.
    [Show full text]