arXiv:2107.11193v1 [gr-qc] 21 Jul 2021 r osbe e ..Refs. of horizons e.g. entropies the see between the possible, correlations of are the sum of since the entropy horizons, necessarily total the not the is However, system hole. the black the of entropy the prevent horizon. even inner or the horizon, of the formation at singularity produce nrp spootoa oteae fteeethorizon, event the of area the S to proportional is entropy fteinrhrznrmisucer h ne horizon inner The role instabilities, the unclear. experience remains since may horizon established, the inner space-time, the well Sitter black of not de charged the is and in holes thermodynamics rotating black the the and as holes such horizons, more l eemndb h rao h ue oio,see.g. see horizon, outer Refs. the in of surfaces area extremal the necessar- not by is determined entropy hole ily black the that suggest which hnbt ne n ue oiosaetknit ac- into does radiation taken of are temperature the horizons that obtains outer one and count, approach. inner tunneling both semiclassical When the using these sidered hole. of black one Kerr Then the to horizons. applied outer is and approaches inner be- give correlations the them the tween demonstrates of which All results, radia- same approaches. the Hawking different cor- several thermal the using and the tion entropy of the temperature calculate We responding hole. black Reissner-Nordstr¨om black charged symmetric the (RN) spherically – of horizons the part two to with most hole devoted The of is holes. instabilities paper black these possible the of the horizons ignore inner (the We the hole hole). black black rotating Kerr the and hole) Nordstr¨om black ffc fteinrhrzno h lc oethermodynamics: hole black the on horizon inner the of Effect fteinrhrzni rsn tmycnrbt othe to contribute may it present is horizon inner the If o h ipetbakhl h Bekenstein-Hawking the hole black simplest the For nScIIterdainfo h Nbakhl scon- is hole black RN the from radiation the Sec.III In Reissner- (the hole black charged the consider we Here = A/ 4 G oee,frtebakhl ihtoor two with hole black the for However, . 2 erNwa lc oe ti hw htteretoyhsth has entropy their that shown mass is on it holes black Kerr-Newman ASnumbers: PACS u owihtettletoyo h lc oeadtetemper the and hole black c the the by of mass entropy determined on is total only tem ou It the the which corresponding horizons. of to two area the of due the entropies for by the determined and of not sum entropy is t entropy the have The for d which radiation. result several hole, same used black w the we Here Kerr hole established. the Reissner-Nordstr¨om black well of symmetric not and is t horizons the hole horizons inner Nordstr¨om black two the with of holes role black the the For horizon. event the aduIsiuefrTertclPyis cd eynva Semyonov acad. Physics, Theoretical for Institute Landau o h cwrshl lc oeteBknti-akn en Bekenstein-Hawking the hole black Schwarzschild the For 1 .INTRODUCTION I. o eprtr aoaoy at nvriy ..Bx151 Box P.O. University, Aalto Laboratory, Temperature Low M ftebakhl n osntdpn nteaglrmomentum angular the on depend not does and hole black the of M 11–13 9,10 ftebakhl n ontdpn ntebakhl charge hole black the on depend not do and hole black the of 1–8 hr r h te hints, other the are There . n eeecstherein. references and hc a rmynot may or may which lc oeadKr lc hole black Kerr and hole black Dtd uy2,2021) 26, July (Dated: ..Volovik G.E. 14–19 h aea ncs fteShazcidbakhl with hole black Schwarzschild the mass of same case the in as same the eauede o eedo h charge the on depend tem- Hawking not modified does The perature horizon. outer the temperature to Hawking related conventional the with coincide not httesae ihdifferent with states the that akn eprtrso w oios exp horizons: two the by of determined factors, temperatures thermal Hawking the of product the as aems.Ti eut hc a osdrdpuzzling considered was which Ref. result, in This mass. same Q akn eprtr:i si gemn ihtether- the with agreement in relation is modynamic it temperature: Hawking exp rma nta otevrulitreit ttsadthen state. and events: states state intermediate final tunneling virtual to the of to initial electron sequence an an from coherent when the systems, electronic experiences of the phenomenon the the in is to cotunneling similar horizons is two which of process, presence correlated the in radiation Hawking n ht oe.Tersl o h nrp fR black RN of entropy the black for the calcu- result both is hole, The of hole entropy holes. the white white find and and to allows hole which black lated, the tun- quantum between macroscopic neling the of probability the proach, ae ntemto ftesnua oriaetrans- Ref. coordinate in singular developed the was of which method formations, the on detector. based the to tunnels then and horizon, the across aito fmsieprilswt nrysalrthan smaller Hawking energy of with process particles mass, The the massive horizons. in of two place the radiation between takes region also the cotunneling in is state ate h needneo h nrp ncharge on entropy the of independence The nScI ti hw htti eutcnb written be can result this that shown is it Sec.IV In nScVteetoyi osdrdi h approach the in considered is entropy the Sec.V In n stesm sfrnurlbakhl ihthe with hole black neutral for as same the is and ,2 1, − S ˜ m < E 22 T RN aclt h nrp fteReissner- the of entropy the calculate e E + emdnmc sntvr la,since clear, very not is hermodynamics . a 442 hroook,Russia Chernogolovka, 142432, 1a, v., ffrn prahs l fte give them of All approaches. ifferent o a o h upr rmtemodified the from support the got has now , reain ewe h w horizons, two the between orrelations e oio,adi snteult the to equal not is it and horizon, ter rp spootoa oteae of area the to proportional is tropy iia rpry tdpnsonly depends it property: similar e tr fHwigrdaindepend radiation Hawking of ature 4 = × eaueo h hra Hawking thermal the of perature ohrzn.Frtespherically the For horizons. wo 0 I006Alo Finland Aalto, FI-00076 00, exp . 19 M πM i.e. , nti aetepril rttunnels first particle the case this In 20,21 − 2 d lode o eedo charge on depend not does also , T S E ˜ − T RN norcs h ita intermedi- virtual the case our In ˜ H J Q hsdmntae htthe that demonstrates This . o h erand Kerr the For . = = n charge and Reissner-Nordstr¨om d 8 πM Q (4 1 πM a eotie ythe by obtained be can . 2 = ) Q . 22 dM Q T ˜ H nti ap- this In . n hsis thus and , . Q − suggests T ˜ E H = 2 adiabatic transformations. However, this would contra- obtained in Ref.23 (see Eq.(68) therein). In the SdS case, dict to the charge conservation. In Sec.VI we consider S+ and S− are the entropies of the cosmological horizon the adiabatic transformation, which does not contradict and the black hole horizon correspondingly. The general to the conservation of the charge Q. It corresponds to concept of temperature in multi-horizon spacetimes with adiabatic change of the fine structure constant α to its application to SdS metric is discussed in Ref.24. zero value. When α slowly decreases to zero the two hori- Similar result takes place for the total entropy of the zons move slowly with conservation of the charge number Kerr black hole (including that of the inner horizon). It Q and energy M. Finally the inner horizon disappears is determined by the mass M and does not depend on and the black hole at α = 0 becomes neutral, in spite the black hole angular momentum J.25 of the finite value of charge Q. In such slow process the First we explain such behaviour of the entropy for the entropy does not change, and is the same as the entropy spherically symmetric RN black hole, We shall use several of the neutral black hole. different approaches. Then in Sec.VII we apply one of In Sec.VII the adiabatic approach of Sec.VI is extended these approaches to the Kerr black hole. to the Kerr black hole. Here the adiabatic process is con- sidered in which the angular momentum J of the black hole is conserved, while the angular velocity of rotation III. HAWKING RADIATION FROM TWO approaches zero value. This adiabatic process demon- HORIZONS strates that the entropy of the Kerr black hole depends only on mass M of the black hole and does not depend The Eq.(5) can be obtained from the temperature of on its angular momentum J. the thermal Hawking radiation, which can be found using the method of the semiclassical quantum tunneling.14–18 II. REISSNER-NORDSTROM¨ BLACK HOLE Now we have two horizons, and thus the Hawking radi- ation temperature can be modified. For RN black hole the PG metric is not well defined. In the semiclassi- The metric of Reissner-Nordstr¨om black hole with the cal method the process of Hawking radiation is typically event horizon at r+ and the inner horizon at r−: studied using the Painleve-Gullstrand (PG) metric.26,27 However, the existence of the inner horizon does not allow 1 ds2 = dt2a(r)+ dr2 + r2dΩ2. (1) for the well defined PG metric to exist,28 and its exten- − a(r) sion is required. The proper extension of the PG metric 29 where is obtained by the following coordinate transformation: 2 (r r−)(r r+) √2Mr r a(r)= − 2 − . (2) dt dt fdr , f = . (7) r → ± r2 + Q2 (r r−)(r r+) − − The positions of horizons are expressed in terms of the p mass M and charge Q of the black hole (G = c = 1): This leads to the black hole and white hole states without singularities at horizons: 2 r+r− = Q , r+ + r− =2M. (3) Q2 1 ds2 = dt2 1+ + (dr vdt)2 +r2dΩ2 , (8) The conventional entropy of RN black hole is typically − r2 Q2 ± 1+ r2 related to the area of the outer horizon: 2 where the shift velocity is: 2 2 2 SRN(r+)= πr+ = π M + M Q (4) p − 2M Q2 v2 = 1+ . (9) However, in Ref.22 the different result was obtained, i.e. r r2 the entropy does not depend on Q: In this extension of the PG coordinates, the shift veloc- 2 S˜RN =4πM . (5) ity is real for all r. This is distinct from the conventional (non-modified) PG coordinates,30,31 where the shift ve- This entropy can be written in the form: locity becomes imaginary for r < r0 = r+r−/(r+ + r−). 2 The tunneling trajectory for massless particle can be S˜RN = S+ + S− , (6) found from the energy spectrum of a particle. The latter p p is determined by the contravariant metric gµν , which is 29 where S+ and S− are the entropies of the external and inverse to the PG metric gµν in Eq.(8): inner horizons correspondingly. The extra term 2 S+S− 2 to the sum of the entropies, S+ + S−, comes fromp the µν Q g pµpν =0 E = prv(r) pr 1+ . (10) correlations between the two horizons. → ± r2 Eq.(6) also describes the entropy of Schwarzschild black hole in the de Sitter space-time (SdS), which was Here pr is the radial momentum, and E = p0. 3
The probability of the tunneling process is given by the Here T+ and T− are the conventional Hawking tempera- exponent of imaginary part of the action along the tun- tures at two horizons, which are determined by the grav- 33 neling trajectory, Im pr(r, E)dr, where the trajectory ity at the horizons: pr(r, E) is R 1 ′ 1 r+ r− T+ = a (r+)= −2 , (17) E 4π 4π r+ pr(r, E)= . (11) Q2 1 ′ 1 r+ r− v(r) 1+ r2 − T− = a (r−)= −2 . (18) 4π −4π r− In the system with two horizons, the imaginary part of the action is produced by both poles. The contribution of The temperature T+ determines the rate of the tunneling two poles gives the following probability of the Hawking from the region r−
PBH-RN→static-RN = exp 2 Im Mdt˜ = (20) − Z It is interesting that Eq.(12) can be interpreted in terms of the conventional Hawking temperatures at two = exp 2 Im M(dt + f(r)dr) = (21) horizons. Eq.(12) can be written as the product of two − Z thermal factors: = exp 2M Im f(r)dr = (22) E E − Z P = P+P− = exp exp . (16) 2 2 −T × −T− = exp π(r+ + r−) /G = exp 4πM G . (23) + − − 4
The probability of the tunneling appears to be the same the parameters of the Standard Model. The gravity with as for the neutral black hole with the same mass M. varying α is the particular case of gravity with nonlin- The probability of the quantum tunneling between the ear electrodynamics (discussion of the latter see e.g. in PG black hole and its static partner with the same mass Refs.49–51 and references therein). can be considered as the quantum fluctuation, which is Now we can adiabatically transform the RN black hole determined by the difference in the entropy of the two by slow change of this parameter α to zero at fixed mass objects.34 Then under the natural assumption that the M and fixed quantum number q. Since in the adiabatic entropy of the intermediate fully static object is zero, process the entropy does not change, it is the same as for the Eq.(23) gives the entropy of the RN black hole in α = 0, and thus it does not depend on α and Q giving agreement with Eq.(5): rise to Eq.(5): 2 SBH-RN(M,Q)= SBH(M, 0)=4πM . (24) 2 S˜RN(α> 0,M)= S˜RN(α =0,M)=4πM . (28) The consideration of the further tunneling – from the static RN state to the RN white hole state – provides At first glance, it looks impossible to fix all three quan- the negative entropy for the Reissner-Nordstr¨om white tities (mass M, charge q and entropy S). However, the hole:22 RN black hole has extra degrees of freedom in the ther- 2 modynamics, which come from the inner horizon. When SWH-RN(M,Q)= SBH-RN(M,Q)= 4πM . (25) − − α slowly decreases to zero, the two horizons in Eq.(27) move slowly with conservation of the charge number q The quantum tunneling from the RN black hole to the and energy M until the inner horizon disappears. In RN white hole with the same mass via the intermediate such slow process the entropy does not change, and thus static state is determined by the following exponent: it is the same as the entropy of the neutral black hole 2 exp(SWH-RN(M,Q) SBH-RN(M,Q)) = exp 8πM . without inner horizon. − − (26) The independence of the entropy on α may solve the It represents one of the many routes of the transformation problem of the quantization rule, which is inspired by the from the black hole to the white hole.35–43 It is interesting string theory.52,53 This quantization conjecture requires that while the formation of the gravitational white hole the square root of a rational number value of the fine has extremely small probability, in hydrodynamic analog structure constant, while the latter is determined by the gravity the white hole horizon is easily formed as the ultraviolet cut-off.54,55 hydraulic jump in the flowing shallow water.44–48 It would be interesting to consider the extension to the All the considerations above demonstrated that the negative α, where only single horizon remains. factor (1 + Q2/r2) in Eqs.(8) and (9) is irrelevant for the entropy and Hawking temperature of the RN black hole. This suggests that this factor can be removed by some adiabatic process, at which the entropy does not VII. ENTROPY OF KERR BLACK HOLE FROM ADIABATIC TRANSFORMATION change. We consider the possibility of such process in the following section. In Sec. VI we considered the adiabatic transformation of the RN black hole to the neutral black hole by the VI. ENTROPY FROM ADIABATIC slow change of the fine structure parameter α to zero at TRANSFORMATION fixed mass M and quantum number Q. In case of the Kerr black hole we need the transformation to the black The independence of S˜RN and T˜H on the charge Q may hole to the non-rotating black hole with the same mass suggest that the RN black hole can be obtained from the M and the angular momentum J. The non-rotating limit neutral BH by adiabatic process, at which the entropy corresponds to zero value of the angular velocity Ω 0 does not change. But this would contradict to the con- at fixed M and J. Now we shall use two parameters,→ one servation of charge Q in the adiabatic process. However, is the Planck energy scale EP which is kept fixed, and let us remember that we used the equations, in which another one is the Planck constant ~, which we change. the fine structure constant α was hidden. With the pa- The variable ~ emerges for example in effective theory as rameter α involved one has the following dependence on the parameter of Minkowski metric.56 The non-rotating α: limit with fixed J is reached at ~ . → ∞ 2 2 2 The Kerr metric has the form: r+r− = αq , r± = M M αq , (27) ± − p ∆ ρ2 Here Q2 = αq2, where q is conserved number, when mea- 2 2 2 2 2 2 ds = 2 (dt a sin θdφ) + dr + ρ dθ + sured in terms of the charge of electron, and the param- −ρ − ∆ eter α – the fine structure constant – is the property of sin2 θ + [adt (r2 + a2)dφ]2 , (29) the quantum vacuum, which can be varied by changing ρ2 − 5 where which suggests that the quantization of the black hole entropy does not depend on J and Q: J ρ2(r.θ)= r2 + a2 cos2 θ, a = , (30) M ~ M∆M 2 2 ∆S =8π 2 =2πn . (36) ∆(r)= r + a 2Mr 2 . (31) EP − EP
Let us now fix the parameters J, M and EP and adi- Let us also mention that the extremal Kerr black hole, abatically change the parameter ~. This change influ- in which the two horizons merge, can be also reached in ences only the function ∆ in Eq.(31), while the parame- the adiabatic process with fixed M and J. This takes ter a = J/M remains fixed, since it does not depend on ~ 2 2 place when J(EP /M ). The same is with the ex- ~. tremal RN black→ hole, which can be reached by the proper The equation ∆(r±) = 0 determines the positions of deformation of the fine structure parameter α, as we dis- the inner and outer horizons. At fixed J, M and EP and cussed in Sec. III. at ~ they behave as: VIII. CONCLUSION → ∞ ~ 2 2 M J EP r+ 2 , r− . (32) ∼ E2 ∼ 2M 3~ We considered the thermodynamics of the black holes P with two horizons. We calculated the entropy of While the outer horizon grows, the inner horizon shrinks, Reissner-Nordstr¨om black hole and the corresponding and in the limit ~ , the entropy is produced only by temperature of the thermal Hawking radiation using sev- the outer horizon:→ ∞ eral different approaches. These are: (i) The method of semiclassical tunneling for calcula- E2 M 2 S πr2 P =4π . (33) tion of the Hawking temperature in Sec.III. + ~2 2 → EP (ii) The cotunneling mechanism – the coherent se- Since the process of transformation of the rotating Kerr quence of tunneling at two horizons, each determined by black hole to the ”non-rotating” Kerr black hole with the corresponding Hawking temperature in Sec. IV. j = J/~ 0 is adiabatic, it demonstrates that that the (iii) The macroscopic quantum tunneling for calcula- entropy of→ the Kerr black hole depends only on mass M: tion of the transition rate from the RN black hole to the RN white hole in Sec.V. 2 M (iv) The adiabatic change of the fine structure constant SKerr(J, M)= SKerr(J =0,M)=4π 2 . (34) EP α to zero and this the adiabatic transformation from the RN black hole to the Schwarzschild black hole in Sec.VI. Eq.(34) is similar to Eq.(28) for the RN black hole. The All of the approaches give the same result. The corre- entropy of Kerr black hole does not depend on the clas- lations between the inner and outer horizons lead to the sical angular momentum J and on its quantum number total entropy and to the temperature of Hawking radi- j. ation, which depend only on mass M of the black hole Eqs. (28) and (34) can be extended to the and do not depend on the black hole charge Q. Kerr–Newman black hole. Using the adiabatic process with α 0 and ~ , one obtains that the total en- The adiabatic approach (iv) has been also applied to tropy of→ the Kerr–Newman→ ∞ black hole is fully determined the Kerr and Kerr–Newman black holes, which demon- by its mass: strated that the total entropy of these black holes de- pends only on mass M and does not depend on the black M 2 hole angular momentum J and charge Q. SKN(J,Q,M)= S(J =0,Q =0,M)=4π 2 . (35) Acknowledgements. This work has been supported EP by the European Research Council (ERC) under the Eu- Note that independence of the entropy on J and Q is sup- ropean Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation ported by the consideration of quasinormal modes,57,58 programme (Grant Agreement No. 694248).
1 R. Penrose, Structure of space-time, in: Battelle Rencon- bility of the Cauchy horizon of Reissner-N¨ordstrom black tres, 1967 Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, edited by holes, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2821–2826 (1979). C.M. DeWitt and J.A. Wheeler, pp. 121–235, Benjamin, 4 Y. G¨ursel, I.D. Novikov, V.D. Sandberg and A.A. New York, 1968. Starobinsky, Final state of the evolution of the interior of 2 J.M. McNamara, Instability of black hole inner horizons, a charged black hole Phys. Rev. D 20, 1260–1270 (1979). Proc. R. Soc. A 358, 499 (1978). 5 E. Poisson and W. Israel, Internal structure of black holes, 3 R.A. Matzner, N. Zamorano and V.D. Sandberg, Insta- Phys. Rev. D 41, 1796–1809 (1990). 6
6 S. Hod and T. Piran, Mass inflation in dynamical gravita- 26 P. Painlev´e, La m´ecanique classique et la th´eorie de la rel- tional collapse of a charged scalar field, Phys. Rev. Lett. ativit´e, C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) 173 , 677 (1921). 81, 1554–1557 (1998). 27 A. Gullstrand, Allgemeine L¨osung des statischen 7 L.M. Burko and A. Ori A, Analytic study of the null sin- Eink¨orper-problems in der Einsteinschen Gravitations- gularity inside spherical charged black holes, Phys. Rev. theorie, Arkiv. Mat. Astron. Fys. 16, 1-15 (1922). D57, 7084–7088 (1998). 28 V. Faraoni and G. Vachon, When Painleve-Gullstrand co- 8 P.M. Chesler, R. Narayan and E. Curiel, Singularities in ordinates fail, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 771 (2020). Reissner–Nordstr ¨mblack holes, Class. Quantum Grav. 37, 29 G.E. Volovik, What can the quantum liquid say on the 025009 (2020). brane black hole, the entropy of extremal black hole 9 Yun He, Meng-Sen Ma and Ren Zhao, Entropy of black and the vacuum energy?, devoted to the honor of Jacob holes with multiple horizons, Nuclear Physics B 930, 513– Bekenstein, Foundations of Physics 33, 349–368 (2003); 523 (2018). gr-qc/0301043. 10 Yubo Ma, Yang Zhang, Lichun Zhang, Liang Wu, Ying 30 A.J.S. Hamilton and J.P. Lisle, The River model of black Gao, Shuo Cao, Yu Pan, Phase transition and entropic holes, Am. J. Phys. 76, 519 (2008); [gr-qc/0411060. force of de Sitter black hole in massive gravity, Eur. Phys. 31 M. Lewkowicz and M.A. Zubkov, Classical limit for Dirac J. C 81, 42 (2021). fermions with modified action in the presence of the black 11 G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and hole, Symmetry 11, 1294 (2019), arXiv:1906.11707. the information paradox, J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 32 S. Hod, Hawking radiation may violate the Penrose cosmic 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2020)002, censorship conjecture, arXiv:2102.05519. arXiv:1905.08255. 33 Zhongxu Zhai and Wenbiao Liu, Nernst theorem and 12 Sayantan Choudhury, Satyaki Chowdhury, Sudhakar Hawking radiation from a Reissner-Nordstr¨om black hole, Panda, Abinash Swain, Nitin Gupta, Anurag Mishara, Astrophys. Space Sci. 325, 63–67 (2010). Sachin Panneer Selvam, Gabriel D. Pasquino, Chiran- 34 L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical jeeb Singha, Circuit complexity from cosmological islands, Physics, Volume 5, Statistical Physics. arXiv:2012.10234. 35 C. Barcelo, R. Carballo-Rubio, L.J. Garay, Mutiny at 13 A. Manu, K. Narayan and Partha Paul, Cosmological sin- the white-hole district, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23, 1442022 gularities, entanglement and quantum extremal surfaces, (2014). JHEP 04 (2021) 200. 36 C. Barcelo, R. Carballo-Rubio, L.J. Garay, Exponential 14 M.K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, Hawking radiation as tun- fading to white of black holes in quantum gravity, Class. neling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5042 (2000). Quantum Grav. 34, 105007 (2017). 15 K. Srinivasan and T. Padmanabhan, Particle production 37 E. Bianchi, M. Christodoulou, F. D’Ambrosio, H.M. Hag- and complex path analysis, Phys. Rev. D 60, 024007 gard and C. Rovelli, White holes as remnants: a surprising (1999). scenario for the end of a black hole, Class. Quantum Grav. 16 G.E. Volovik, Simulation of Painleve-Gullstrand black hole 35, 225003 (2018). in thin 3He-A film, Pis’ma ZhETF 69, 662 – 668 (1999), 38 P. Martin-Dussaud and C. Rovelli, Evaporating black-to- JETP Lett. 69, 705 – 713 (1999); gr-qc/9901077. white hole, Class. Quantum Grav. 36, 245002 (2019). 17 E.T. Akhmedov, V. Akhmedova, D. Singleton, Hawking 39 C. Rovelli, Viewpoint: Black hole evolution traced out with temperature in the tunneling picture, Phys. Lett. B 642, loop quantum gravity, Physics 11, 127 (2018). 124–128 (2006). 40 J.B. Achour, J.P. Uzan, Effective theory of a pulsating 18 L. Vanzo, G. Acquaviva and R. Di Criscienzo, Tun- Planck star, arXiv:2001.06153. nelling methods and Hawking’s radiation: achievements 41 F. Soltani, C. Rovelli and P. Martin-Dussaud, The end of and prospects, Class. Quantum Grav. 28, 183001 (2011). a black hole’s evaporation, Part II, arXiv:2105.06876. 19 G. Jannes, Hawking radiation of E Phys. Rev. D 96, 104008 (2017), arXiv:1708.05226. zons of the Kerr-Newman black hole, JHEP 1206 (2012) ∗ 50 S.I. Kruglov, The shadow of M87 black hole within ratio- 023. nal nonlinear electrodynamics, Modern Physics Letters A 55 M. Visser, Area products for stationary black hole hori- 35, 2050291 (2020). zons, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044014 (2013). 51 Z. Amirabi and S.H. Mazharimousavi, Black-hole solution 56 G.E. Volovik, ~ as parameter of Minkowski metric in ef- in nonlinear electrodynamics with the maximum allowable fective theory, Pis’ma ZhETF 90, 793–799 (2009); JETP symmetries, European Physical Journal C 81, 207 (2021). Lett. 90, 697–704 (2009); arXiv:0904.1965. 52 G.T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, Counting states of near- 57 A.J.M Medved, On the Kerr quantum area spectrum, extremal black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2368 (1996). Class. Quantum Grav. 25, 205014 (2008). 53 M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons and C.N. Pope, Universal area 58 E.C. Vagenas, Area spectrum of rotating black holes product formulas for rotating and charged black holes in via the new interpretation of quasinormal modes, JHEP four and higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 121301 0811:073 (2008). (2011). 54 M. Visser, Quantization of area for event and Cauchy hori-