041-2011-Abstracts-BOE-III-Crete.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

041-2011-Abstracts-BOE-III-Crete.Pdf Boreskov Institute of Catalysis of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia Borissiak Paleontological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia III International Conference “Biosphere Origin and Evolution” RETHYMNO, CRETE, GREECE OCTOBER 16-20, 2011 ABSTRACTS Novosibirsk, 2011 © Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, 2011 INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Alexei Rozanov, Borissiak Paleontological Institute RAS, Moscow, Russia Co‐Chairman Georgii Zavarzin, Institute of Microbiology RAS, Moscow, Russia Co‐Chairman Vadim Agol Moscow State University, Russia Yury Chernov Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Moscow, Russia Institute of Protein Research RAS, Pushchino, Moscow region, Alexander Chetverin Russia David Deamer Biomolecular Engineering, School of Engineering, Santa Cruz, USA V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy SB RAS, Nikolay Dobretsov Novosibirsk, Russia Mikhail Fedonkin Geological Institute RAS, Moscow, Russia Siegfried Franck Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany V.I. Vernadskii Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry Eric Galimov RAS, Moscow, Russia Mikhail Grachev Limnological Institute SB RAS, Irkutsk, Russia Richard Hoover Nasa Marshall Space Flight Ctr., Huntsville, USA North‐Western Scientific Center RAS, St. Petersburg State Sergey Inge‐Vechtomov University, Russia Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum‐Gas Geology and Geophysics Alexander Kanygin SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Astrospace Centre of Lebedev Physical Institute RAS, Moscow, Nikolay Kardashev Russia Józef Kaźmierczak Institute of Paleobiology PAN, Warsaw, Poland Nikolay Kolchanov Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum‐Gas Geology and Geophysics Alexei Kontorovich SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library Eugene V. Koonin of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA V.I. Vernadskii Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry Mikhail Marov RAS, Moscow, Russia Koen Martens Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium Koichiro Matsuno Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan Victor Melezhik Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, Norway Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Yuri Natochin St. Petersburg, Russia Valentin Parmon Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Lab. Interuniversitaire Des Systemes Atmopsheriques, Umr Cnrs, François Raulin Paris, France Michael Russell California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA N.I. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics RAS, Lomonosov Sergey Shestakov Moscow University, Russia Vladimir Shumnyi Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Boris Shustov Institute of Astronomy RAS, Moscow, Russia Institute of Protein Research RAS, Pushchino, Moscow region, Alexander Spirin Russia Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine SB RAS, Valentin Vlasov Novosibirsk, Russia Nikolay Yushkin Institute of Geology, UB RAS, Syktyvkar, Russia Lev Zelenyi Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia LOCAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Valentin Parmon, Co‐Chairman Novosibirsk, Russia Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Nikolay Kolchanov, Co‐Chairman Novosibirsk, Russia Valeriy Snytnikov, Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Scientific Secretary Novosibirsk, Russia Sergey Rozhnov Borissiak Paleontological Institute RAS, Moscow, Russia Alexey Lopatin Borissiak Paleontological Institute RAS, Moscow, Russia Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Oxana Taran Novosibirsk, Russia Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Tatiana Zamulina, Secretary Novosibirsk, Russia Conference co‐organizer, executive representative of the Organizing Committee: ILIKO TRAVEL company PLENARY LECTURES PL‐1 EARTH AND PLANETS ORIGIN: HOW DO WE VIEW AND MODEL IT? Marov M. V.I. Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry RAS, Moscow, Russia Solar system origin is regarded as a cornerstone of the planets formation and eventually Earth evolution towards biosphere set up. While planets birth from gas‐dust discs is quite routine process in our and other galaxies, solar system configuration, and specifically Earth, seems to be unique. Obviously, multiple physical and chemical processes underlied this event and ensured specific scenario to distinguish solar system from other planetary systems. Understanding and reconstruction of these processes is the main goal and the great challenge of the planetary cosmogony. The contemporary views and further progress in the field are supported by astronomical observations of the numerous gas‐dust discs around young solar type stars, escalating discoveries of extrasolar planets, and computer modeling of the planetary systems formation and early evolution based on the advanced theoretical approach and enormous advancement in computing capacity. Complex problems are addressed in the models development, data of observation placing important constraints on the models validity. Our approach is based on heterogenic mechanics of turbulent media involving in‐depth study of disc thermodynamics on the accretion stage from which the key cosmochemical consequences emerge. In particular we argue that because in the region of Earth‐Venus orbit temperature was not lower than 300– 500 К, the reduced water‐lacking matter different from CI carbonaceous chondrites by absence of hydrosilicates and volatiles would originated. This means that Earth and its neighbors has born as water‐poor bodies and an other source of volatiles, probably of exogenic nature, would require to compensate such a lack and to make possible their hydrosphere/atmosphere appearance. Comets and asteroids impacted inner planets at the very early stage of the solar system formation are invoked as such a plausible source. Disc dynamics is thoroughly evaluated with the involvement of dust subdisk formation in the near‐equatorial plane and its fragmentation into dust clusters due to gravitational instability accompanied by the angular momentum transfer. Numerous solid bodies of asteroid size appeared from subdisk at this early stage within the first million years after solar system formation – evidence that is supported by radio isotopes dating of iron and stony meteorites available as collisional fragments of these bodies which are regarded as the 6 PL‐1 first planetesimals (embryos of planet‐size bodies). The follow up evolutionary dynamics of the protoplanetary disc appears to involve the continuing processes of remaining dust clusters and planetesimals of different size collisions. Basically our dynamical models are focused on the molecular dynamics approach and weighted Monte Carlo algorithms for numerical evaluation of dust clusters formation including coagulation processes and solid bodies interaction under various physical‐chemical parameters and geometry. Peculiarities of gas‐dust clumps interaction with different mass ratio and collision velocities, as well as physical mechanisms occurred in the contact zone of interacting solid bodies involving energy redistribution and some other non‐linear effects were investigated. The models developed allow us to distinguish between the more or less realistic mechanisms of planets grow from planetesimals incorporating chronology emerging from radio nuclides isotopy. Some important questions remain open, however, in particular those about stability maintenance of dust clusters and solid bodies within ring compression, time scale of the processes of interaction and phase transitions including, first of all, condensation and coagulation. These questions and prospects of further study are discussed in terms of their impact on the intriguing problem of life and biosphere origin. 7 PL‐2 ANALYSIS OF ISOTOPE SYSTEM DATA (Hf‐W, Rb‐Sr, J, Pu‐Xe, U‐Pb) AS APPLIED TO THE PROBLEM OF PLANET FORMATION. CASE STUDY: EARTH‐MOON SYSTEM Galimov E.M. V.I. Vernadskii Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry RAS, Moscow, Russia Isotope data provide important geochemical constraints for models of accumulation of planets, including the Earth‐Moon system. 182 184 Short living isotope Hf decays into W with T1/2 ~ 9 million years, so that Hf‐W system enlightens the very early stage of accumulation of planets. In particular, analysis of the 182Hf/184W system shows that the Moon could not have come into existence earlier than 50 million years after formation of the Solar system. Since, on the other hand, there are certain rocks on the Moon whose age has been estimated as approximately 70 million years after formation of the Solar system, the Hf‐W system indicates that the likely interval of formation of the Moon would be 50‐70 million years. In contrast to 182Hf 87Rb is a very long living isotope, yielding 87Sr. The lunar initial 87Sr/86Sr suggests some higher Rb content in the Moon than it is observed. Rubidium may have been lost as a volatile element. But because of its high atomic weight, it cannot run away from the lunar surface. Rb may escape only from the heated surfaces of small bodies or particles. It makes likely that the pre‐lunar material existed in a dispersed form at the time preceded to emerging of the Moon as a condensed body (i.e. during about 50‐70 Mln years). Indications on the preliminary dispersed stay may also have been inferred as regard to the Earth accumulation.
Recommended publications
  • Spirin a S. Spektrofotometrichesloe Opredelenie Summarnogo Kolichestva
    CC/NUMBER 21 This Week’s Citation Classic MAY26,1986 ~ Spirin A S. Spektrofotometrichesloe opredelenie summarnogo kolichestva . nukleinovykh kislot (Spectrophotometric determination of total nucleic acids). Biokhimiya (USSR) 23:656-62. 1958. (A.N. Bakh Institute of Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, USSR] The paper describes a simple universal cient of molar extinction ~270= 10,000 in method of determining nucleic acids in bio- hot HCIO extracts of nucleic acids re- logical materials based on the measurement gardless of4 the type (DNA or RNA) and of the difference in optical densities of the base composition of the nucleic acids hot HCIO extract at two wavelengths, 270 under investigation. m~iand 2904 mp. [The SCI® indicates that this Subsequently, a modification had to paper has been cited in over 760 publica- be made to reduce the effect of extract- tions.] ed ultraviolet-absorbing materials of a nonnucleic acid nature; instead of a di- rect measurement of optical density at 270 m~i,I suggested using the difference of optical densities at two close wave- lengths, 270 m~and 290 m~(the differ- ence in optical densities at 270 m~and Alexander Spirin 290 m~idivided by 0.19 gives the number Institute of Protein Research of nucleic acid phosphorus micrograms Academy of Sciences of the USSR per milliliter). The method proved to be 142292 Pushchino, Moscow Region very convenient and yielded precise re- USSR sults at testing on a large number of ob- jects of animal and plant origin. (Howev- er, when applied to bacteria, the meth- od in this differential variant gave some February 20, 1986 under- or overestimation in the cases of extreme GC or AT types of their DNA, respectively.) Under strong pressure from my col- In 1955.1957 I was a postgraduate stu- leagues, I sent a two-page typewritten dent in A.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Science Summit Week Assw 2009
    ARCTIC SCIENCE SUMMIT WEEK ASSW 2009 Bergen, Norway, 22-28 March 2009 Welcome to ASSW 2009 In 1999, the first Arctic Science Summit Week (ASSW) was organized in Tromsø, Norway. This summit was set up to hold the meetings of all Arctic science organizations together on one location in one week. The platform was created to provide opportunities for international coordination, collaboration and cooperation in all disciplines of Arctic science. It was meant to combine science with management meetings. In this way business meetings were combined with a science and a project day, and the host country was offered the opportunity to present its most recent Arctic research. Side meetings organized by other groups with interest in Arctic science and policy took place at the same time. Now, after ten ASSWs organized in ten different countries all over the world, the organizations behind this event decided to change the concept of the week by including not only annual meetings of the Arctic science organizations, but also an Open Science Symposium. Instead of the science and project day, a three days international symposium was organized under the ambitious theme: Arctic Connections - results of 150 years of Arctic research. It is the intention of the organizers to make this the official symposium for International Arctic Science. We hope that the model we have chosen for the symposium will give you the possibility to get an impression of the wide specter of research activities that have taken place in the Arctic throughout the history. After ten years the ASSW is back in Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards the Construction of Escherichia Coli Cell-Free Protein Synthesis System Platform
    Towards the construction of Escherichia coli cell-free protein synthesis system platform Sara Alexandra Peça de Sousa Rosa Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in Biotechnology Supervisor(s): Professor Luís Joaquim Pina da Fonseca Examination Committee Chairperson: Professor Arsénio do Carmo Sales Mendes Fialho Supervisor: Professor Luís Joaquim Pina da Fonseca Member of the Committee: Professor Gabriel António Amaro Monteiro July 2015 ii Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to professor Lu´ıs Fonseca, for giving me the opportunity to work in a subject that I fell in love with. I would like to thank to all my colleges of 7th and 8th floor, for all the help, advice, and support. Without all of you I would not be able to finish my work. I would also like to thank to Doctor Ana Azevedo and Sofia Duarte, for all the help and tips. I would like to give a special thanks to Ana, Andreia, Catia,´ Elsa, Pedro, Rita and Ricardo, for help and support during the best and worst times. I also want to thank to Claudia,´ for the time spent inside IST walls. Most of all, I would like to thank my mom and dad for all the support. I also want to thank to my grandmother, for all the concern, and to my nieces, Beatriz and Margarida. Finally, I want to thank Davide, for always being there. My words will be never enough to express my gratitude towards you. Thank you all. iii iv Resumo Sistemas produtores de prote´ınas livres de celulas´ sao˜ descritos como a expressao˜ in vitro de prote´ınas recombinantes sem o recurso a celulas´ vivas.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian National Committee for Igcp
    RUSSIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR IGCP ANNUAL REPORT ON IGCP ACTIVITIES FOR 2014 This report informs on the Russia’s activities in the IGCP projects in 2014. Chairman: Prof. Mikhail A. Fedonkin Russian National Committee for IGCP GIN RAS, Pyzhevsky, 7, 119017 Moscow, Russia Tel: + 7 495 951-75-00/ 8 495 953 37 91 Fax: +7 495 953 37 64 E- mail: [email protected] The current Committee’s membership comprises twenty four members including the following Bureau members: Mikhail A. Fedonkin (Chairman, Geological Institute, GIN RAS); Igor D. Ryabchikov (Vice Chairman, Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry, IGEM RAS); Oleg A. Bogatikov (Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry, IGEM RAS); Eric M. Galimov (Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry , GEOKHI RAS ); Alexander O. Gliko (Institute of Physics of the Earth, RAS); Yury G. Leonov (Geological Institute, GIN RAS). Projects with Russian co-leaders: Project 587 Entity, Facies and Time – the Ediacaran (Vendian) Puzzle (2010-2014), Leaders: Mikhail Fedonkin (Russia), Patricia Vickers-Rich (Australia), Jim Gehling (Australia), Guy Narbonne (Canada) Project 592 Continental construction in Central Asia (2012-2015), Leaders: Inna Safonova (Russia), Reimar Seltmann (UK), Min Sun (China) Project 596 Climate Change and Biodiversity Patterns in the Mid-Paleozoic (2011-2015). Leaders: Peter Konigshof (Germany), Thomas G. Suttner (Austria), Iliana A. Boncheva (Bulgaria), Nadezhda G. Izokh (Russia), Phuong Ta Hoa (Vietnam), Thasinee Charoentitirat (Thailand), Johny A. Waters (USA), Wolfgang Kiessling (Germany). Project 609 Cretaceous Sea-Level Changes (2013-2017). Leaders: M.Wagreich (Austria), X.Hu (China), S.Voigt (Germany, J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • New Siberian Islands Archipelago)
    Detrital zircon ages and provenance of the Upper Paleozoic successions of Kotel’ny Island (New Siberian Islands archipelago) Victoria B. Ershova1,*, Andrei V. Prokopiev2, Andrei K. Khudoley1, Nikolay N. Sobolev3, and Eugeny O. Petrov3 1INSTITUTE OF EARTH SCIENCE, ST. PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITETSKAYA NAB. 7/9, ST. PETERSBURG 199034, RUSSIA 2DIAMOND AND PRECIOUS METAL GEOLOGY INSTITUTE, SIBERIAN BRANCH, RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, LENIN PROSPECT 39, YAKUTSK 677980, RUSSIA 3RUSSIAN GEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (VSEGEI), SREDNIY PROSPECT 74, ST. PETERSBURG 199106, RUSSIA ABSTRACT Plate-tectonic models for the Paleozoic evolution of the Arctic are numerous and diverse. Our detrital zircon provenance study of Upper Paleozoic sandstones from Kotel’ny Island (New Siberian Island archipelago) provides new data on the provenance of clastic sediments and crustal affinity of the New Siberian Islands. Upper Devonian–Lower Carboniferous deposits yield detrital zircon populations that are consistent with the age of magmatic and metamorphic rocks within the Grenvillian-Sveconorwegian, Timanian, and Caledonian orogenic belts, but not with the Siberian craton. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test reveals a strong similarity between detrital zircon populations within Devonian–Permian clastics of the New Siberian Islands, Wrangel Island (and possibly Chukotka), and the Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago. These results suggest that the New Siberian Islands, along with Wrangel Island and the Severnaya Zemlya Archipelago, were located along the northern margin of Laurentia-Baltica in the Late Devonian–Mississippian and possibly made up a single tectonic block. Detrital zircon populations from the Permian clastics record a dramatic shift to a Uralian provenance. The data and results presented here provide vital information to aid Paleozoic tectonic reconstructions of the Arctic region prior to opening of the Mesozoic oceanic basins.
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 Doug Murphy in 1978, Doug Murphy's Lab at the Johns
    1992 Doug Murphy In 1978, Doug Murphy's lab at the Johns Hopkins Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy invited a Russian postdoc from Alexander Spirin's group to join them. The 1979 invasion of Afghanistan and the 1980 boycott of the Olympics, however, heightened the Cold War and prevented the exchange. Since Russians could not leave the Soviet Union, the only alternative for scientific exchange was for US scientists to go to the USSR. Armed with a deep interest in foreign languages—he speaks three, including Russian—Murphy felt this was a good time to extend his life beyond the bench and do something on a human scale, so he went to Russia himself. Under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences, he spent one month in the USSR. Amid bugged rooms and tight security, Murphy discovered that the official animosity toward US scientists was not shared by Soviet scientists. The Russian scientists were starved for US scientific news. Generally six months behind in scientific developments, nothing was trivial to them. "They wanted to know everything," says Murphy, "how the cultures differed, what the everyday life of a scientist was like— everything." Although life in Russia is far different from life in the US, Murphy discovered that Americans can easily identify with Russians because both are "warm and generous." That first visit led to six more visits in the following years, including one in 1985 where Murphy gave a lecture series entitled "The Molecular Biology of the Cytoskeleton". With the beginning of glasnost, more Russian scientists were allowed to leave the USSR.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL PROTECTED AREAS of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: AREAS PROTECTED NATIONAL Vladimir Krever, Mikhail Stishov, Irina Onufrenya
    WWF WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation WWF-Russia organizations, with almost 5 million supporters and a global network active in more than 19, bld.3 Nikoloyamskaya St., 100 countries. 109240 Moscow WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a Russia future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: Tel.: +7 495 727 09 39 • conserving the world’s biological diversity Fax: +7 495 727 09 38 • ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable [email protected] • promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. http://www.wwf.ru The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy - the leading conservation organization working around the world to The Nature Conservancy protect ecologically important lands and waters for nature and people. Worldwide Office The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100 NNATIONALATIONAL PPROTECTEDROTECTED AAREASREAS communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters Arlington, VA 22203-1606 they need to survive. Tel: +1 (703) 841-5300 http://www.nature.org OOFF TTHEHE RRUSSIANUSSIAN FFEDERATION:EDERATION: MAVA The mission of the Foundation is to contribute to maintaining terrestrial and aquatic Fondation pour la ecosystems, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with a view to preserving their biodiversity. Protection de la Nature GGAPAP AANALYSISNALYSIS To this end, it promotes scientific research, training and integrated management practices Le Petit Essert whose effectiveness has been proved, while securing a future for local populations in cultural, 1147 Montricher, Suisse economic and ecological terms.
    [Show full text]
  • IUGS's Annual Report for 2019
    Surveys” at the RFG2018 conference attended (IPA), by several national geological surveys (GSC, ◇International Association of Sedimentologists USGS, BGR, BGS, Japan, Finland, Norway, (IAS), Australia etc.); ◇IGCP council meetings, ◇a follow-up meeting of the International Consortium of Geological Surveys (ICOGS) ◇Alliance of International Science Organiza- organized at the Prospectors and Developers tions (ANSO), Association of Canada (PDAC) Convention by ◇International Consortium on Landslides (ICL), It has been several months since the outbreak organizations. The DDE program was officially GSC and USGS for directors and representa- of the COVID-19 which has put the whole world announced at the 73rd IUGS EC meeting held in tives of geological surveys attended by about 20 ◇Int. Society of Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical at risk, has claimed hundreds of thousands lives Beijing on February 26-29, 2019. The DDE delegates from Australia, New Zealand, South Engineering (ISSMGE), and caused devastating social and economic mission is to harmonize Earth evolution data Africa, Afghanistan, USA, Tasmania, France, ◇Int. Association for Engineering Geology and consequences. I would like to express IUGS’ and share global geoscience knowledge and its Germany, Republic of Senegal, the Organiza- the Environment (IAEG). sincere sympathy to those who have lost their vision is to promote Earth science transforma- tion of African Geological Survey (OAGS), and loved ones and who are still suffering from the tion. Unlike other existing databases, DDE will EuroGeosurveys; The IUGS initiatives were also discussed with spreading of the pandemic. I sincerely thank all provide the geologies and geographies of Earth ◇Sessions of Directors of Geological Surveys ISC, UNESCO and the GeoUnions.
    [Show full text]
  • European Science Review
    European science review № 11–12 2016 November–December «East West» Association for Advanced Studies and Higher Education GmbH Vienna 2016 European Sciences review Scientific journal № 11–12 2016 (November–December) ISSN 2310-5577 Editor-in-chief Lucas Koenig, Austria, Doctor of Economics International editorial board Abdulkasimov Ali, Uzbekistan, Doctor of Geography Kocherbaeva Aynura Anatolevna, Kyrgyzstan, Doctor of Economics Adieva Aynura Abduzhalalovna, Kyrgyzstan, Doctor of Economics Kushaliyev Kaisar Zhalitovich, Kazakhstan, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Arabaev Cholponkul Isaevich, Kyrgyzstan, Doctor of Law Lekerova Gulsim, Kazakhstan, Doctor of Psychology Zagir V. Atayev, Russia, Ph.D. of of Geographical Sciences Melnichuk Marina Vladimirovna, Russia, Doctor of Economics Akhmedova Raziyat Abdullayevna, Russia, Doctor of Philology Meymanov Bakyt Kattoevich, Kyrgyzstan, Doctor of Economics Balabiev Kairat Rahimovich, Kazakhstan, Doctor of Law Moldabek Kulakhmet, Kazakhstan, Doctor of Education Barlybaeva Saule Hatiyatovna, Kazakhstan, Doctor of History Morozova Natalay Ivanovna, Russia, Doctor of Economics Bestugin Alexander Roaldovich, Russia, Doctor of Engineering Sciences Moskvin Victor Anatolevich, Russia, Doctor of Psychology Boselin S.R. Prabhu, India, Doctor of Engineering Sciences Nagiyev Polad Yusif, Azerbaijan, Ph.D. of Agricultural Sciences Bondarenko Natalia Grigorievna, Russia, Doctor of Philosophy Naletova Natalia Yurevna, Russia, Doctor of Education Bogolib Tatiana Maksimovna, Ukraine, Doctor of Economics Novikov Alexei, Russia, Doctor of Education Bulatbaeva Aygul Abdimazhitovna, Kazakhstan, Doctor of Education Salaev Sanatbek Komiljanovich, Uzbekistan, Doctor of Economics Chiladze George Bidzinovich, Georgia, Doctor of Economics, Doctor of Law Shadiev Rizamat Davranovich, Uzbekistan, Doctor of Education Dalibor M. Elezović, Serbia, Doctor of History Shhahutova Zarema Zorievna, Russia, Ph.D. of Education Gurov Valeriy Nikolaevich, Russia, Doctor of Education Soltanova Nazilya Bagir, Azerbaijan, Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Pincelli M. Hull [email protected] (203) 823-7985
    Yale University Department of Geology & Geophysics PO Box 208109 New Haven, CT 06520-8109 Pincelli M. Hull [email protected] (203) 823-7985 http://earth.geology.yale.edu/~ph269/ PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS Assistant Professor, Yale University, Department of Geology & Geophysics July 2013 EDUCATION Yale University, Department of Geology & Geophysics April 2010 – June 2013 ! Post Doctoral Associate [mentor: Derek E. G. Briggs] Universität Konstanz, Department of Biology Oct 2010 – Aug 2011 ! Visiting Postdoctoral Researcher [mentor: Axel Meyer] Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD June 2004 – April 2010 ! PhD, Dissertation Title: Macroevolutionary patterns in planktonic foraminifera and the recovery of pelagic ecosystems from the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction ! Advisors: Richard D. Norris and Mark D. Ohman ! Committee: Peter J.S. Franks, Jeremy B.C. Jackson, Lawrence Saul, George Sugihara ! Curriculum: Biological Oceanography and Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation [IGERT Associate, Interdisciplinary Graduate Education Research and Training, NSF] Duke University Sept 1999 – June 2003 ! B.S. Biology, B.S. Earth and Ocean Sciences, German Minor Sea Education Association Spring 1999 ! College semester at sea: oceanography, nautical science, maritime history [C-163] RESEARCH INTERESTS Evolution of Oceans and Life [Paleontology, Paleoceanography, and Global Change] ! Ecological and evolutionary response of marine ecosystems to past global change ! Paleoceanographic and planktonic foraminiferal evolution in the early
    [Show full text]
  • Biology Curricula at Universities
    Biology curricula at universities European Communities Biologists Association ECBA publication No 1 Biology curricula at universities Report of a Workshop organized by the European Communities Biologists Association Index 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. OBJECTIVES OF THE WORKSHOP......................................................................................................... 5 3. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 6 4. THE BASIC TRAINING BIOLOGISTS PRIOR TO SPECIALIZATION .................................................. 8 4.1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2. TOPICS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CENTRAL CORE-PROGRAM................................................................... 8 4.3. SKILLS AND ATTITUDES....................................................................................................................... 10 5. THE PHASE OF SPECIALIZATION (INTO PROFESSION)................................................................... 12 5.1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 12 5.2. FURTHER TRAINING IN RESEARCH ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 1987 Summer 1987 NSU Oceanographic Center
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Currents Publications by HCNSO Summer 1987 Summer 1987 NSU Oceanographic Center Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_currents Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons NSUWorks Citation NSU Oceanographic Center, "Summer 1987" (1987). Currents. 90. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_currents/90 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications by HCNSO at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Currents by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CENTER FACULTY FROM THE PURSUE DIVERSE STUDIES IN DIRECTOR OCEANOGRAPHY The Oceanographic Center of Nova University has a rich history In the' beginning, under the that goes back to its founding in directorship of the late Dr. William 1966 by Dr. WilliamS. Richardson, our faculty were Richardson the first director. predominantly physical The laborat~ry prospered until oceanographers. In fact, our tragedy struck in 1975, w~en Dr. -' ~ / original name was the Physical Richardson and four associates Dr. Julian P. McCreary Oceanographic Laboratory (fondly were lost at sea while conducting provided by highly competitive known as "The Lab"). In the late an open-ocean experiment off the l'Os our name was changed to the grants from such agencies as the coast of Maine. This tragic event National Science Foundation, the Ocean Sciences Center, and the was the first fatal oceanographic nature of our research changed as Office of Naval Research, NOAA, accident in history, and it sent NASA, and the U.S.
    [Show full text]