DOCSLIB.ORG

Kern County Parks and Recreation Department: Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

parks and recreation master plan county of kern parks and recreation department PREPARED BY: MIG, Inc. 801 North Harbor Boulevard Fullerton, California 92832 P: 714.871.3638 F: 714.871.1188 www.migcom.com MAY 2010 acknowledgments We would like to thank the many citizens, staff, and community groups who provided extensive input for the development of this Parks and Recreation Master Plan. This project was truly a community effort, ensur- ing that this plan will meet the needs and desires of all residents in Kern County KERN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Jon McQuiston, District 1 Don Maben, District 2 Mike Maggard, District 3 Ray Watson, District 4 Michael J. Rubio, District 5 COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER John Nilon KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Bob Jamison, District 1 Ted Hodgkinson, District 2 Carl Park, District 3 Richard Walters, District 4 Nanette Brightwell, District 5 KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Robert Lerude, Director John Wilbanks, Planner John Laybourn, Planner KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Key Issues 1 1.2 Planning Process 4 1.3 Goals and Key Recommendations 6 1.4 Park Standards and Level of Service 7 1.5 Organizational Reform 9 1.6 Funding Recommendations 10 CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Plan Purpose 1 1.2 How the Plan Was Developed 2 1.3 Relationship to Other Planning Activities 5 1.4 Plan Organization 11 1.5 Plan Overview 12 1.6 Implementation 14 CHAPTER II: PLANNING CONTEXT 2.1 Regional Context 1 2.2 History 2 2.3 Community Profiles 3 2.4 Local Park Jurisdictions 5 2.5 Other Park and Recreation Providers 8 2.6 Planning Context Implications 9 CHAPTER III: EXISTING PARK AND RECREATION SYSTEM 3.1 Park Classifications 1 3.2 Existing Park Inventory and Conditions 4 Area 1 – North Kern County 6 Area 2 – South Kern County 22 KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN table of contents Area 3 – Greater Bakersfield 34 Area 4 – West Kern County 64 Area 5 & 5B – Valley: North and South of Bakersfield 76 3.3 - Kern County Capital Improvement Plan and Parks and Recreation Master Plan 83 3.4 Parks and Facilities Provided by Others 83 3.5 Recreation Programs 84 3.6 Program Providers 85 3.7 Comparable County Programs 91 CHAPTER IV: PARK, FACILITY AND PROGRAM NEEDS 4.1 Public Involvement Results 2 4.2 Public Outreach Summaries 3 Stakeholder Interviews 3 Telephone Survey 4 Web-Based and Self Administered Questionnaires 6 Focus Groups 10 Community Visioning Workshops 12 4.3 Key Findings 17 CHAPTER V: POLICIES, GOALS AND ACTIONS 5.1 Policy I/Goals 1 to 6 1 5.2 Policy II/Goals 7 to 12 7 5.3 Park Standards 12 5.4 Park Standards and Level of Service 12 5.5 Impact of Population Growth on Level of Service 18 CHAPTER VI: IMPLEMENTATION/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 6.1 Observations 1 6.2 Recommended Capital Projects - Overview 4 6.3 Recommendations by Category 11 KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN table of contents CHAPTER VII: ORGANIZATIONAL REFORM OF COUNTY PARK SYSTEM 7.1 Changes in the Institutional and Financial Environments for Parks and Recreation 1 7.2 The Need for Regional Cooperation 4 7.3 Regional Parks and Recreation Authority 6 7.4 Concurrent Need for Local Control of Parks 9 7.5 Establishing Roles and Responsibilities 10 7.6 Building Community Support 14 CHAPTER VIII –FUNDING OPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 Relation to Capital Improvement Plan 1 8.2 Existing Funding Sources 2 8.3 Expenditures 4 8.4 Proposed Capital Projects 6 8.5 Estimated Operations and Maintenance Costs 10 8.6 Potential Additional Revenue Sources – Capital 11 8.7 Potential Additional Revenue Sources – Maintenance and Operations 14 8.8 Summary and Recommendations 18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES executive summary THE KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DEVELOPS AND MAINTAINS A SAFE, ACCESSIBLE, HIGH QUALITY REGIONAL SYSTEM OF PARKS, OPEN SPACES, LANDSCAPES, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES TO SUPPORT AND ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR OUR RESIDENTS AND VISITORS. KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT executive summary IN THE SPRING OF 2008, Kern 1.1 KEY ISSUES County began the development of Kern County is facing a number of a Parks and Recreation Master Plan issues that influence the develop- to evaluate the County’s current ment and management of parks, park and recreation resources, as- recreation facilities and recreation sess the needs for the future, and services. The 2010 Kern County develop a road map to achieving Parks and Recreation Master Plan those needs. The development of is designed to respond to these this plan was a collaborative effort issues, positioning the Kern County involving staff from the Parks De- Parks and Recreation Department partment, elected officials, repre- to better serve residents and other sentatives from other park agencies, visitors to the Kern County park and stakeholders and residents system now and into the future. from communities throughout Kern Landscape, Development and County. This plan represents the Population - Scale and Diversity first master plan developed for the The third largest county in the County of Kern Parks and Recre- state of California, Kern County ation Department. is a unique and diverse place in The primary purpose of this master terms of its natural resources, land plan is to help guide decision-mak- use, development and people. Its ers in the development of the Kern widely varied landscape is shaped County park system over the next by mountains, deserts, and valleys, twenty years. The recommenda- include some of the most produc- tions, goals and strategies present- tive agricultural lands in the country ed here were developed based on as well as still active, burgeoning an assessment of all existing County oil fields. Although Kern County parks and public input to identify has been among the fastest grow- community priorities. ing counties in California, much of KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN | ES-1 executive summary that growth has been focused in the for more growth in the future remains Bakersfield metropolitan region. The strong. When the economy recovers, eastern desert and mountain areas, it is anticipated that much of that new as well as the western edges of the growth will be in the form of more County, remain comparatively sparse- compact, dense development, requir- ly populated and rural in character. ing an even greater need for acces- This diversity of conditions coupled sible parks, recreation services and to the sheer geographic size of the trails to serve the residents in these County underlies the operational and communities. management challenge facing the Overlapping Jurisdictions Parks and Recreation Department. In addition to the Kern County Parks Demographic and Socio-Economic and Recreation Department, there are Change many different cities, independent The influx of new residents from other park districts, private organizations, parts of California as well as a grow- and State and Federal agencies, ing Hispanic population has gradually providing parks, open space, and altered the demographic and socio- recreation facilities throughout Kern economic profile of the County. This County. Overlapping jurisdictions, shift in the demographic makeup of goals and strategies have helped cre- the population has gradually led to ate an interesting patchwork of parks, a new set of expectations regarding open space and recreation programs. parks and recreation services that are Some areas of the County have different from what existed in earlier multiple park and recreation provid- decades when much of the present- ers, whereas other areas depend day County park system was devel- almost exclusively on the Kern County oped. In addition, unincorporated Parks and Recreation Department areas in and near the Bakersfield as the major provider. The need for metropolitan area have experienced increased cooperation and coordina- rapid urbanization, creating areas tion between these multiple park and that lack adequate parks and recre- recreation providers to avoid unnec- ation services. Although Kern County, essary duplication, as well as gaps, along with the rest of California, is in facilities and services remains an now experiencing a severe economic important challenge. and housing downturn, the potential ES-2 | KERN COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN executive summary Regional and Local Parks grade its parks and facilities, acquire The Kern County Parks and Recreation and develop new sites, provide more Department manages an extensive trails, and support the maintenance system of large regional parks de- increases that new parks will require. signed to serve the entire countywide The County has relied primarily on population, and small neighbor- its General Fund to support its park hood and community parks intended system which must compete with pub- primarily to meet the recreational lic safety and other County depart- needs of nearby residents in unin- ments for needed funding. Revenue corporated communities where no from other sources such as user fees other recreation providers are present. constitutes a relatively small portion of Over the several decades since the the overall budget. By not adequately Department was established in 1952, implementing the County’s Quimby cities have expanded their territories program or putting in place a system through annexation and independent of development impact fees, a signifi- park districts have been established cant opportunity to generate revenue in many unincorporated areas of the needed for acquisition of park land county. Despite these changes, the and the development of new parks Kern County Parks and Recreation was missed during the growth pe- Department still operates and man- riod of the last two decades. No ages a large number of local parks new County parks have been built located within the geographic jurisdic- in decades despite this population tions of local cities and park districts.
Recommended publications
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
  • Bakersfield General Plan Template

    Bakersfield General Plan Template

    2.4 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT 2.4 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT The Parks and Open Space Element details how open space, recreational areas and natural resource areas will be preserved and managed. 2.4.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS The 2002 Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan addresses Parks and Open Space in two separate elements. It is proposed that these two elements be combined under one comprehensive Parks and Open Space Element as part of the General Plan Update. Therefore, the following is a brief overview of both the Parks and Open space elements of the 2002 Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. Parks Parks are generally categorized as either “local” or “regional” in the 2002 Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan. Local parks generally range from 1 to 2.5 acres for mini-parks, 5- 10 acres for neighborhood parks, and approximately 30 acres for community parks. Regional parks, on the other hand, can range anywhere from 20 to 1,000 acres and may serve a population living within a one–hour drive (about 50 miles). Historically, park facilities in the planning area have been provided by the City of Bakersfield, Kern County, the North of the River Recreation and Park District (NORRPD), Bear Mountain Recreation and Park District, school districts, colleges, and, most recently, private developers. Regional parks have been the responsibility of Kern County. The City of Bakersfield and Kern County operate regional, community and neighborhood parks and trails, along with community centers and other recreational facilities. The park system under the jurisdiction of the City of Bakersfield includes more than 50 parks, recreation facilities and trails such as the Kern River Parkway (see Figure 2.4.1-1 Existing Parks in Metropolitan Bakersfield, below, and Table 2.4.1-1 Existing Parks in Metropolitan Bakersfield, located at the end of this chapter, for a listing of all parks in the Metropolitan Bakersfield area).
  • California State Parks

    California State Parks

    1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 Pelican SB Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Smith River Off Highway Vehicle Use Off Highway Vehicle Use Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating ( Tolowa Dunes SP C Educational Programs Educational Programs Wind Surfing/Surfing Wind Surfing/Surfing lo RV Sites w/Hookups RV Sites w/Hookups Gasquet 199 s Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating A 101 ed Horseback Riding Horseback Riding Lake Earl RV Dump Station Mountain Biking RV Dump Station Mountain Biking r i S v e n m i t h R i Rustic Cabins Rustic Cabins w Visitor Center Food Service Visitor Center Food Service Camp Site(s) Snow Sports Camp Site(s) Geocaching Snow Sports Crescent City i Picnic Area Camp Store Geocaching Picnic Area Camp Store Jedediah Smith Redwoods n Restrooms RV Access Swimming Restrooms RV Access Swimming t Hilt S r e Seiad ShowersMuseum ShowersMuseum e r California Lodging California Lodging SP v ) l Klamath Iron Fishing Fishing F i i Horse Beach Hiking Beach Hiking o a Valley Gate r R r River k T Happy Creek Res. Copco Del Norte Coast Redwoods SP h r t i t e s Lake State Parks State Parks · S m Camp v e 96 i r Hornbrook R C h c Meiss Dorris PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES t i Scott Bar f OREGON i Requa a Lake Tulelake c Admiral William Standley SRA, G2 • • (707) 247-3318 Indian Grinding Rock SHP, K7 • • • • • • • • • • • (209) 296-7488 Klamath m a P Lower CALIFORNIA Redwood K l a Yreka 5 Tule Ahjumawi Lava Springs SP, D7 • • • • • • • • • (530) 335-2777 Jack London SHP, J2 • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 938-5216 l K Sc Macdoel Klamath a o tt Montague Lake A I m R National iv Lake Albany SMR, K3 • • • • • • (888) 327-2757 Jedediah Smith Redwoods SP, A2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 458-3018 e S Mount a r Park h I4 E2 t 3 Newell Anderson Marsh SHP, • • • • • • (707) 994-0688 John B.
  • Chapter 8 Manzanar

    Chapter 8 Manzanar

    CHAPTER 8 MANZANAR Introduction The Manzanar Relocation Center, initially referred to as the “Owens Valley Reception Center”, was located at about 36oo44' N latitude and 118 09'W longitude, and at about 3,900 feet elevation in east-central California’s Inyo County (Figure 8.1). Independence lay about six miles north and Lone Pine approximately ten miles south along U.S. highway 395. Los Angeles is about 225 miles to the south and Las Vegas approximately 230 miles to the southeast. The relocation center was named after Manzanar, a turn-of-the-century fruit town at the site that disappeared after the City of Los Angeles purchased its land and water. The Los Angeles Aqueduct lies about a mile to the east. The Works Progress Administration (1939, p. 517-518), on the eve of World War II, described this area as: This section of US 395 penetrates a land of contrasts–cool crests and burning lowlands, fertile agricultural regions and untamed deserts. It is a land where Indians made a last stand against the invading white man, where bandits sought refuge from early vigilante retribution; a land of fortunes–past and present–in gold, silver, tungsten, marble, soda, and borax; and a land esteemed by sportsmen because of scores of lakes and streams abounding with trout and forests alive with game. The highway follows the irregular base of the towering Sierra Nevada, past the highest peak in any of the States–Mount Whitney–at the western approach to Death Valley, the Nation’s lowest, and hottest, area. The following pages address: 1) the physical and human setting in which Manzanar was located; 2) why east central California was selected for a relocation center; 3) the structural layout of Manzanar; 4) the origins of Manzanar’s evacuees; 5) how Manzanar’s evacuees interacted with the physical and human environments of east central California; 6) relocation patterns of Manzanar’s evacuees; 7) the fate of Manzanar after closing; and 8) the impact of Manzanar on east central California some 60 years after closing.
  • The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Promotes a More Efficient

    The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan Promotes a More Efficient

    CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS – VERSION 5 CHAPTER 5 STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS INTRODUCTION This chapter sets forth plans of action for the region to pursue and meet identified transportation needs and issues. Planned investments are consistent with the goals and policies of the plan, the Sustainable Community Strategy element (see chapter 4) and must be financially constrained. These projects are listed in the Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) and are modeled in the Air Quality Conformity Analysis. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes Forecast modeling methods in this Regional Transportation a more efficient transportation Plan primarily use the “market-based approach” based on demographic data and economic trends (see chapter 3). The system that calls for fully forecast modeling was used to analyze the strategic funding alternative investments in the combined action elements found in this transportation modes, while chapter.. emphasizing transportation demand and transporation Alternative scenarios are not addressed in this document; they are, however, addressed and analyzed for their system management feasibility and impacts in the Environmental Impact Report approaches for new highway prepared for the 2014 Regional Transportation Plan, as capacity. required by the California Environmental Quality Act (State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126(f) and 15126.6(a)). From this point, the alternatives have been predetermined and projects that would deliver the most benefit were selected. The 2014 Regional Transportation Plan promotes a more efficient transportation system that calls for fully funding alternative transportation modes, while emphasizing transportation demand and transporation system management approaches for new highway capacity. The Constrained Program of Projects (Table 5-1) includes projects that move the region toward a financially constrained and balanced system.
  • Low Stress Bikeway Network in The

    Low Stress Bikeway Network in The

    Bakersfield LOW STRESS BIKE NETWORK PLAN PROPOSAL TO CREATE A LOW-STRESS BIKEWAY NETWORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE BAKERSFIELD HIGH-SPEED RAIL STATION ALIFORNIA 81CYCLE COALITION CONTENTS Executive Summary � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1 Summary of Implementation Objectives � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �1 Recommended Projects � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �2 Methodology � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Existing Conditions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Community Outreach � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �3 Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 4 Site Area � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Project Team � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Existing Conditions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 Demographics and Mode Share � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �5 Goals � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �6 Public Health � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �7
  • 05/28/2021[Icon]

    05/28/2021[Icon]

    OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER May 28, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Christian Clegg, City Manager CC SUBJECT: General Information City administrative offices will be closed Monday, May 31, in observance of the Memorial Day holiday. Curbside trash and recycling services will not be affected. Notable Items The City of Bakersfield’s Solid Waste Division will host a pair of pop-up large trash item drop-off events on Saturday, June 5 at Kaiser Permanente Sports Village (9001 Ashe Road) and at 4200 Panorama Drive. City residents are welcome to bring trash items that don’t fit in their tan bins to those locations between 8 a.m. and noon. Part of Bakersfield's Clean City Initiative – funded by the Public Safety & Vital Services (PSVS) Measure – these events have proved quite popular with the public since launching in January of this year. The last events, held on May 19, collected almost 14 tons of trash items. The Clean City Initiative aims to reduce illegal dumping and debris seen around the City, improving quality of life for our residents and visitors. All nine City-maintained spray parks will begin operations this weekend, starting on Saturday, May 29. Hours of operation will be from 1 to 6 p.m. each day, Tuesday through Sunday through Labor Day. All spray parks will be closed on Mondays as a proactive water conservation effort and to provide staff an opportunity to perform any maintenance needed at the spray General Information May 28, 2021 Page 2 parks. The spray parks will be open on Mondays when there is a holiday observed: May 31 (Memorial Day), July 5 (Independence Day observed) and September 6 (Labor Day).
  • Agendas, Meetings and Other Opportunities to Participate, As Appropriate

    Agendas, Meetings and Other Opportunities to Participate, As Appropriate

    KERN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MEETING OF REGIONAL PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION MODELING COMMITTEE KERN COG BOARD ROOM WEDNESDAY 1401 19TH STREET, THIRD FLOOR January 2, 2019 BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 1:30 P.M. Dial +1 (312) 878-3080 https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/586617702 Access Code: 586-617-702 I. ROLL CALL: II. PUBLIC COMMENTS: This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons to address the Committee on any matter not on this agenda but under the jurisdiction of the Committee. Committee members may respond briefly to statements made or questions posed. They may ask a question for clarification; make a referral to staff for factual information or request staff to report back to the Committee at a later meeting. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO TWO MINUTES. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD PRIOR TO MAKING A PRESENTATION. Disabled individuals who need special assistance to attend or participate in a meeting of the Regional Planning Advisory Committee may request assistance at 1401 19th Street, Suite 300; Bakersfield CA 93301 or by calling (661) 635-2910. Every effort will be made to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities by making meeting material available in alternative formats. Requests for assistance should be made at least three (3) working days in advance whenever possible. III. APPROVAL OF DISCUSSION SUMMARY • RPAC Meeting of August 1, 2018 • RPAC Meeting of October 3, 2018 IV. FEDERAL SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT (PM1) “TOWARD ZERO” 2019 TARGET UPDATE (Flickinger) Comment: Required federal process to annually monitor transportation safety performance measure progress, including encouragement of member agencies to improve safety on our streets with their transportation expenditures.
  • National Register Nomination for the Security Trust Company

    National Register Nomination for the Security Trust Company

    NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FOR THE SECURITY TRUST COMPANY BANK BUILDING A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of History California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History (Public History) by Paul Rendes FALL 2016 © 2016 Paul Rendes ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FOR THE SECURITY TRUST COMPANY BANK BUILDING A Project by Paul Rendes Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Lee Simpson __________________________________, Second Reader Rebecca Bunse ____________________________ Date iii Student: Paul Rendes I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Dr. Anne Lindsay Date Department of History iv Abstract of NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION FOR THE SECURITY TRUST COMPANY BANK BUILDING by Paul Rendes This project determines the eligibility of and establishes a historic context for the nomination of the Security Trust Company Bank Building to the National Register of Historic Places as a commercial building, with an accompanying nomination form. Sources of data used in this project include county assessor records, maps, historic and contemporary photographs, city and county histories, city directories, journal and newspaper articles, articles of incorporation, architectural plans, biographical texts, and contemporary literature on historic preservation and architectural history. The Security Trust Company Bank Building is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A and C. Under Criterion A, the property is eligible for its association with the 1952 Bakersfield earthquake.
  • AT OFFICE of the CITY MANAGER May 26, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor

    AT OFFICE of the CITY MANAGER May 26, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor

    OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER May 26, 2017 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Alan Tandy, City Manager AT SUBJECT: General Information City offices will be closed Monday, May 29th, in observance of Memorial Day. Good News: ¾ Earlier this week the Bakersfield Fire Department held a ribbon cutting and reopening ceremony for Fire Station No. 8 in northeast Bakersfield. Mayor Goh, Councilmembers Weir, Gonzales and Parlier, as well as many Fire Department staff and community members attended the event. Over the past two years, the station has undergone a complete rehabilitation, bringing the facility up to modern fire station standards. The rehabbed station will continue to serve the community for many years to come. Thanks to all those involved in the project. ¾ All nine City Spray Parks will open to the public tomorrow, May 27th seven days a week through Labor Day, September 4th! The locations include: Beale, Dr. Martin Luther King, Greystone, Jastro, Jefferson, Planz, Saunders, Siemon and Wayside Parks. General Information May 26, 2017 Page 2 ¾ A ribbon cutting was held today to officially reopen the waterslides at the McMurtrey Aquatic Center. Mayor Goh along with Councilmembers Gonzales and Parlier were on hand to celebrate the occasion. The project included replacing both original slide structures with new slides. ¾ Operation Splash will be held on Memorial Day, Monday May 29th from 1 to 4 p.m. with activities for the entire family at the McMurtrey Aquatic Center. The new waterslides will be open to the public for the first time! Cost is $4 per person or $13 for groups of four.
  • 2009 Report Card Report Card for Kern County’S Infrastructure

    2009 Report Card Report Card for Kern County’S Infrastructure

    2009 2009 Report Card Report Card for Kern County’s Infrastructure Atmospheric Quality D Energy B Solid Waste A Waste Water B- Domestic Water B- Northern Calif. Delta D Schools B- Parks C- Kern County’s Infrastructure Transportation D+ A County at the Crossroads Airports B Roads D Highways D Transit C- Bridges C+ Rail C+ Flood Control D+ Kern County’s Infrastructure C- A Citizen’s Guide Leadership Messages on Restoring America’s Infrastructure: “We will rebuild and retrofit America to meet the demands of the Twenty-First Century. That means repairing and modernizing thousands of miles of America’s roadways and providing new mass transit options for millions of Americans. If we act boldly, A Few Words of Special Appreciation: we will emerge stronger and more prosperous than we were before.” The IRCC members are, of course, deeply indebted to the members of the local ASCE, ACEC and APWA organizations for Barack H. Obama their support of this Report Card project. Even though those organizations were the originators of the project, the continuing 44th President of the United States commitment of their memberships to it is still deserving of recognition as an important public service. Much volunteer time (Excerpted from ASCE's video, “2009 Report Card for America's Infrastructure”) has been spent, as well as considerable funding from lean organizational budgets. It is to be hoped that those citizens of Kern County who review this document will understand and appreciate such commitment, as well as the sense of genuine concern “Crumbling infrastructure has a direct impact on our personal and economic health, and the nation’s infrastructure crisis is underlying the efforts reported in these pages.
  • Environmental Assessment ESA Endangered Species Act Exchanger the Cross Valley CVP Contractor Who Is Considered to Be the First Party in the Exchange

    Environmental Assessment ESA Endangered Species Act Exchanger the Cross Valley CVP Contractor Who Is Considered to Be the First Party in the Exchange

    Article 5 Exchange Draft EA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Acronyms and Definitions………………………………………………………. ii Section 1 Purpose and Need…………………………………………………….. 1 Section 2 Alternatives…………………………………………………………… 8 Section 3 Affected Environment……………………………………………….. 11 Section 4 Environmental Consequences……………………………………….. 27 Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species……….. 36 Section 5 Environmental Commitments……………………………………….. 41 Section 6 References…………………………………………………………….. 42 Section 7 Consultation and Coordination……………………………………… 43 Section 8 List of Agencies and Persons Consulted…………………………….. 44 Appendix Appendix A Article 5 Language………………………………………………… 44 Appendix B Imbalanced Exchange Scenarios………………………………….. 48 Appendix C Cross Valley Contractors………………………………………….. 50 Appendix D Friant Division Potential Exchangees…………………………….. 58 Appendix E Other Non-CVP Water Districts and Potential Exchangees……. 68 Appendix F State Listed Species and Species of Concern……………………... 102 Appendix G Figures 3-1 thru 3-4 Maps………………………………………… 107 Tables Table 1.1 List of CV Contractors and CVP Supply……………………………. 2 Table 3.1 CV Contractors and Subcontractors………………………………… 12 Table 3.2 Potential Exchangees from the Friant Division CVP Contractors…. 13 Table 3.3 Deer Creek & Tule River Authority………………………………….. 14 Table 3.4 Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District…………………………. 14 Table 3.5 Kern County Water Agency…………………………………………... 15 Table 3.6 Kern Water Bank Authority………………………………………….. 16 Table 3.7 Kings River Conservation District…………………………………… 16 Table 3.8 Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District…………………………… 17 Table 3.9 Groundwater Basins and Subbasins…………………………….……. 19 Table 3.10 Threatened and Endangered Species that may Occur within the Action Area……………………………………………. 24 i Article 5 Exchange Draft EA LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Acronyms and Definitions AEWSD Arvin Edison Water Storage District AF Acre foot. The quantity of water required to cover one acre of land to a depth of one foot (325,872 gallons).