DOCSLIB.ORG

Discrimination Against Migrant Workers 2007-2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Discrimination Against Migrant Workers 2007-2010 Discrimination against Migrant Workers 2007-2010: Trends August Gächter and Challenges Final report 28.09.2010 This report was prepared as a working paper in conjunction with the ILO’s 2011 Global Report un- der the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Thanks to Gina Rhee, Milena Kremmel, and Andrea Davila for research assistance. 2 Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 5 Scope of the report.................................................................................................................. 5 Selection and presentation of material..................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: The recession and its impact on migrant workers .......................................................... 7 Not all migrant employing economies are equally affected by the crisis................................... 7 Crisis impacts on the number of migrant workers: data issues .............................................. 10 Are migrant workers leaving crisis-hit labour markets?.......................................................... 12 Voluntary return programmes................................................................................................ 19 Population employment rates ................................................................................................ 23 Labour force unemployment rates......................................................................................... 27 Youth unemployment ............................................................................................................ 37 Practices, lessons, and gaps................................................................................................. 38 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 38 Chapter 2: Discrimination against migrant workers ....................................................................... 40 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 40 Forms of discrimination ......................................................................................................... 40 The challenges of this chapter............................................................................................... 40 The likeliness of complaints ...................................................................................................... 41 Few official complaints .......................................................................................................... 41 Access to information on protections against discrimination.................................................. 44 Right to an effective remedy.................................................................................................. 46 Implementation gaps............................................................................................................. 47 Employment opportunities......................................................................................................... 48 Employment, and specifically hiring....................................................................................... 48 Labour force nationalisation policies...................................................................................... 51 Employment termination........................................................................................................ 52 Illegalisation .......................................................................................................................... 52 Forced return......................................................................................................................... 53 Recruitment agencies............................................................................................................ 54 Sending policies.................................................................................................................... 56 Human trafficking .................................................................................................................. 56 Discriminatory job advertising................................................................................................ 58 Dress codes .......................................................................................................................... 59 Language prohibitions........................................................................................................... 60 Access to vocational training ................................................................................................. 60 Working conditions.................................................................................................................... 60 Working conditions in general ............................................................................................... 60 Wages................................................................................................................................... 63 Excessive hours.................................................................................................................... 65 Religious holidays ................................................................................................................. 66 Overeducation and deskilling ................................................................................................ 67 Freedom of association ......................................................................................................... 70 Legal provisions tying workers to employers ......................................................................... 70 Curtailed freedom of movement ............................................................................................ 72 Violence, abuse, intimidation................................................................................................. 73 Racism, stigmatisation, stereotyping ..................................................................................... 76 Social conditions ....................................................................................................................... 76 Support in unemployment...................................................................................................... 76 3 Health and illness.................................................................................................................. 77 Insufficient protection of family and social life........................................................................ 77 Cultural expression ............................................................................................................... 77 Dysfunctional legislation and organisation............................................................................. 78 Remittances .......................................................................................................................... 79 Franchise .............................................................................................................................. 79 Services to workers abroad................................................................................................... 80 Children left behind ............................................................................................................... 80 Voluntary return and reintegration ......................................................................................... 81 Practices, lessons, and gaps................................................................................................. 81 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 82 Chapter 3: Legal developments .................................................................................................... 84 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 84 Conditions of employment..................................................................................................... 84 Workers tied to employers..................................................................................................... 86 Recruitment........................................................................................................................... 87 Illegalisation .......................................................................................................................... 88 Forced return......................................................................................................................... 88 Social conditions ................................................................................................................... 88 Cooperation between countries of origin and of employment ................................................ 89 Debate on a numbers vs. rights trade-off............................................................................... 90 Practices, lessons, and gaps................................................................................................. 91 Recommendations ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Government Turns the Other Way As Judges Make Findings About Torture and Other Abuse
    USA SEE NO EVIL GOVERNMENT TURNS THE OTHER WAY AS JUDGES MAKE FINDINGS ABOUT TORTURE AND OTHER ABUSE Amnesty International Publications First published in February 2011 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org Copyright Amnesty International Publications 2011 Index: AMR 51/005/2011 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Amnesty International is a global movement of 2.2 million people in more than 150 countries and territories, who campaign on human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments. We research, campaign, advocate and mobilize to end abuses of human rights. Amnesty International is independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion. Our work is largely financed by contributions from our membership and donations CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Judges point to human rights violations, executive turns away ........................................... 4 Absence
    [Show full text]
  • The Drug Hang Up, America's Fifty-Year Folly
    The Drug Hang Up, America's Fifty-Year Folly by Rufus King Chapter 29 The Bad Scene Today TOBACCO and alcohol owe their important places in American life to two interacting forces. One is the demand created by millions of people who have learned that using these substances makes them feel good. The other is a supply pressed on the market by promoters whose motive is an eagerness for profit. No matter that neither product has redeeming value as nutrient or medicine. No matter that the ravages attributed to both are well known. Feeling good and avoiding feeling bad are among America's most highly esteemed objectives. After all, our noblest declaration of national purpose begins with a reference to "the Pursuit of Happiness." Some of the drugs (other drugs, remember) which so alarm Americans are much better producers of good feelings and better suppressers of pain and anxiety than anything in the liquor or nicotine lines. Most are also less dangerous. Several are widely relied upon in legitimate therapy. Thus it is inevitable that many people who learn about them one way or another will become users, given the chance, and will be willing to pay enough for their desirable effects to make large profits for suppliers. Consumer prices for tobacco products are inflated one or two times over production costs by taxes, while in the case of beverage alcohol the inflation is nearer fivefold. The competing purveyor of illegal substances, on the other hand, keeps his profits, at least while he remains uncaught, to the last penny. The only thing he must somehow manage to do without is the agricultural subsidy paid to tobacco and grain suppliers directly out of federal taxpayers' pockets.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Extreme Vulnerability of Migrants: the Cases of the United
    Migraciones Internacionales ISSN: 1665-8906 [email protected] El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, A.C. México Bustamante, Jorge A. Extreme Vulnerability of Migrants: The Cases of the United States and Mexico Migraciones Internacionales, vol. 6, núm. 1, enero-junio, 2011, pp. 97-118 El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, A.C. Tijuana, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15119042004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Extreme Vulnerability of Migrants: The Cases of the United States and Mexico Jorge A. Bustamante El Colegio de la Frontera Norte Abstract Vulnerability of migrants and reports about human rights violations against im­ migrants in Mexico and the United States are analyzed and contrasted in regard to the reaction of both governments respectively about those reports. A theoretical frame of the concept of vulnerability is discussed. Keywords: 1. social inequality, 2. Hegelian dialectic, 3. vulnerability of mi­ grants, 4. human rights migrants, 5. globalization. La vulnerabilidad extrema de los migrantes: Los casos de Estados Unidos y México Resumen En este artículo se discute el contraste entre las reacciones de los gobiernos de Méxi­ co y Estados Unidos ante evidencias de violaciones a los derechos humanos de sus respectivos inmigrantes y se analizan algunas condiciones de su vulnerabilidad a la luz de un marco teórico resumido en un diagrama. Palabras clave: 1. desigualdad social, 2. dialéctica hegeliana, 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Tribunals (Scotland)
    EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Case No: 4101287/2020 Hearing by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) on 25, 26, 27 and 28 May 2021 Employment Judge: M A Macleod 10 Tribunal Member: S Gray Tribunal Member: A McFarlane Steuart Wilson Claimant Represented by 15 Mr D Hay Advocate Instructed by Mr R Milvenan Solicitor 20 The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland Respondent Represented by 25 Dr A Gibson Solicitor 30 JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The unanimous Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is that the claimant’s claim of victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 fails and is dismissed. 35 REASONS 1. The claimant presented a claim to the Employment Tribunal on 4 March 2020 in which he complained that he was discriminated against on the grounds of disability, and unlawfully deprived of wages to which he was 40 contractually entitled. ETZ4(WR) 410 1287/20 Page 2 2. The respondent submitted a response in which they resisted all claims made by the claimant. 3. A hearing on the merits was listed to take place on 25 to 28 May 2021, by CVP in light of the ongoing restrictions in place owing to the coronavirus 5 pandemic. 4. The claimant appeared and was represented by Mr Hay, Advocate, instructed by Mr Milvenan, Solicitor. The respondent was represented by Dr Gibson, Solicitor. 5. Parties presented a joint bundle of documents to which reference was made 10 in the course of the hearing. There was some confusion at the outset of the hearing as to whether the Tribunal had been provided with the complete, up to date bundle of documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Operations in Medical Research – Report
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH The Vile, Unspeakable Crimes of British Postwar Science & Medicine by Michael S. Jones First published 2004 Revised & extended 2011-2021 Latest revision: 27 April 2021 – www.somr.info – Special Operations in Medical Research 1 Contents Note on the revised text 2 PART 1 3 Introduction 4 Evidence 7 Summations 21 Analysis 26 Technical Concerns 26 Ethics 32 Consent 38 Technocracy 41 PART 2 (2004-2020) 47 MRI Evidence 48 2nd MRI Head Scan (2013) 60 Complaint to the GMC 70 Spinal MRI Scans (2015-2020) 72 Attempts on My Life 81 Complaints against the Police 98 Applications for Political Asylum 106 Concluding Remarks 115 References 123 Special Operations in Medical Research 2 Note on the revised text Part 1 of this document was first written in 2003 and published on the Internet in 2004. The document has since gone through a series of revisions and additions. To begin with it was not possible to include certain key items of evidence that have come into my possession only since December 2010. The conclusions of the earlier document were arrived at by a long process of deduction which was necessarily limited in its impetus to an array of largely historical and circumstantial details and observations, together with certain items of extant medical evidence. These conclusions were confirmed in later editions by the inclusion of further evidence in Part 2. The part of the Analysis section under the subtitle Technocracy (Part 1, pp.41-46) – in which there is some speculative discussion of the likely medical and technological imperatives that I understand must have informed the alleged illicit research program – was greatly extended in 2012, and represents the most significant revision of the original document (excluding Part 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Doctor of Philosophy in English
    SURVIVAL THROUGH REDEMPTION OF SELF IN THE SELECT NOVELS OF ALICE WALKER Thesis submitted to the Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English by N. R. CHARRUMATHI Assistant Professor Department of English Velalar College of Engineering and Technology Thindal Erode 638012 Tamilnadu India [email protected] Under the Supervision of Dr. SHOBHA RAMASWAMY, M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D. DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH KONGUNADU ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS) COIMBATORE – 641 029 INDIA DECEMBER 2013 Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 14:12 December 2014 N. R. Charrumathi, M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D. Survival Through Redemption Of Self In The Select Novels Of Alice Walker – Doctoral Dissertation i <21-243> DECLARATION I, Ms. N. R. Charrumathi, hereby declare that the thesis entitled “Survival through Redemption of Self in the Select Novels of Alice Walker” submitted to the Bharathiar University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English, is a record of original and independent research work done by me during the period 2007-2013 (Independent Registration) under the supervision and guidance of Dr. Shobha Ramaswamy, M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Kongunadu Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, and the thesis has not formed the basis for the award of any Degree/Diploma/ Associateship/ Fellowship or other similar title to any candidate of any University. Date: Signature of the Candidate Place: Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 14:12 December 2014 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Atopoi Place of the Indian Residential School
    Atopoi of the Modern:Modern: RevisitingRevisiting the Place of the Indian Residential School Geoffrey Carr University of British Columbia ,, off ered a formal Oapology to the Indigenous peoples of Canada for the federal government’s imposition of the Indian Residential School () system. is long-awaited gesture of contrition was proff ered in the wake of a multibillion dollar reparation package and the inception of a fi ve-year Truth and Reconcili- ation Commission (). Increasingly, governments across the globe are partaking in the politics of regret, and as a consequence more scrutiny has fallen on the form and content of what are now called symbolic reparations: off ering public apologies; expunging off ensive names attached to institu- tions, buildings, and streets; constructing commemorative museums; and commissioning memorials. One of the more persistent critiques of such symbolic reparations is the way in which they sublimate and compartmentalize the pain of mass social trauma.¹ is tendency appears in postapology sound bites circulating in For the scope and implications of symbolic reparations see Ana Cutter Patel, Pablo de Greiff , and Lars Waldorf, eds., Disarming the Past ()() and Bran- don Hamber and Ingrid Palmary, “Gender, Memorialization, and Symbolic Reparations” in Ruth Rubio-Martin, ed., e Gender of Reparations (). For critiques see John Torpey, Making Whole What Has Been Smashed () and Andreas Huyssen, Present Pasts (). ESC .. (March(March ):): –– the Canadian media, encouraging the nation to “turn the page on this pain- ful history.” In this way, the offi cial politics of regret in Canada produces a disquieting sense that the teleological ends of the democratic nation- G C is a state may yet be realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Vulnerability of Migrants: the Ac Ses of the United States and Mexico Jorge A
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2010 Extreme Vulnerability of Migrants: The aC ses of the United States and Mexico Jorge A. Bustamante This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/imbr_2010/5 This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/imbr_2010 Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Immigration Law Commons, and the International Law Commons EXTREME VULNERABILITY OF MIGRANTS: THE CASES OF THE UNITED STATES AND MEXICO JORGE A. B USTAMANTE* This paper was prepared as an academic work with the sole responsibility of the author. It was originally presented at the Permanent Forum on Arab-African Dialogue on Democracy and Human Rights in Cairo, Egypt from December 7–9, 2009. This paper deals with the notion of vulnerability of migrants, 1 with respect to the realities of two countries, the United States and Mexico. The vulnerabil- ity of migrants is understood as a heterogeneously imposed condition of powerlessness. This is based on the premise that migrants are inherently vulnerable as subjects of human rights from the point of their departure as they leave home to initiate their migration. That is, any human being is less vulnerable at home than after she leaves home to become a migrant. The same applies to a sociological extension of the notion of home - a community of origin. The same person that migrates has more resources to defend or protect herself when she is at home prior to moving elsewhere than after the outward movement has taken place.
    [Show full text]
  • In Triplicate)
    Second Public Commentary Regarding SEC Public Consultation Concerning Proposed Amendment to Exchange Act Rule 21F-6 (in triplicate) For the attention of: The Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street NE Washington DC 20549-1090 United States of America BY COURIER & EMAIL Reference: File Number S7-16-18 Additional Comments pertaining to: https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2018/34-83557.pdf More specifically the proposed amendment to reduce awards for whistleblowers in large monetary recoveries and its wider implications. 44. Cautionary Note, Disclaimer, Forward-Looking Statements and Format 44.1. Please refer to the last page of this letter regarding Cautionary Note, Disclaimer and Forward-Looking Statements before reading the below. 44.2. Please note that all comments and observations below is based on my interpretation of the facts and circumstances. 44.3. This Second Public Commentary is made in addition to my initial Public Commentary dated 4 September 2018 - https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-16-18/s71618-4355164- 174072.pdf - and I here follow the numbering and use the same definitions and abbreviations. 1 45. Executive Summary 45.1. When I decided to become a whistleblower under the SEC Whistleblower Program I was under the impression that the SEC and the whistleblower were on ‘the same page’, i.e. that the SEC wanted high quality information in order to hold serious offenders accountable for severe breaches of the securities law and related fraudulent activities. 45.2. I have since learnt that the SEC has through cronyism and politics been infiltrated by a Wall Street establishment (the “Wall Street Establishment”) who is systematically ignoring fundamental issues of conflicts of interest and is indifferent to fundamental ethical considerations and its lack of impartiality in executing their public duties.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report to the Attorney General from the Department of Justice Drug-Facilitated Rape Working Group
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Washington,D.C. 20531 A Report to the Attorney General from the Department of Justice Drug-Facilitated Rape Working Group Nora Fitzgerald, K. Jack Riley, Ph.D., Tiffany Alston, Cynthia Mamalian, Michelle-Marie Mendez, Abbey Resnick, Bruce Taylor, Ph.D., and Jane Wiseman June 26,1998 Memorandumto theAttorney General Page2 Subject:Report from the DOJ Drus-Facilitated RapeWorkinq Group Administration,theViolence Against Women Act office,the Violence Against Women Grants Office,the Office for Victims of Crime,the Officeof ConsumerLitigation, the Criminal Division'sNarc~tiss and Dangerous Drugs Division,the Executive Office of theUnited StatesAttorneys, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.Representatives from the Officeof theAttorney General, the Office of theDeputy Attorney General, the Office of theAssociate Attorney General, and the Officeof IntergovernmentalAffairs {participatedin the work group meetings and providedcomments as well. Thisdocument reports on thedata available to answerthe question of howoften drug- facilitatedrape occurs. There are no nationalstatistics for this offense such as wouldbe providedby theUniform Crime Reports,the National Criminal Victimization Survey,or theNational Judicial Reporting Program.Consequently, a thorough review of other,non-national-level research on this issuewas undertaken. This search revealed thatno empiricaland scientifically reliable dataexist to answerthe question. Theissue was therefore investigated using a numberof othermethods and
    [Show full text]
  • Disclaimer Re. Reportage by Dr. Katherine Horton on the Subject of What Transpired at Erasme Hospital, October 18, 2017 Onwards, in the Medical Kidnapping of Ms
    Disclaimer Re. Reportage by Dr. Katherine Horton on the Subject of What Transpired at Erasme Hospital, October 18, 2017 onwards, in the Medical Kidnapping of Ms. Melanie Vritschan's Newborn, as Recorded in JIT Press Releases and articles at The Everyday Concerned Citizen --Ramola D/October 27, 2018 I am making a formal disclaimer to disassociate myself from any of Dr. Katherine Horton's disputed reportage as conveyed to me and later reported in the press releases and articles I wrote in October to December 2017 reporting the matter for JIT, the US-Europe Joint Investigation Team, for which I acted as Press Officer. I do stand by all reportage I have published in these releases and all articles as later corroborated by Ms. Melanie Vritschan. I reported all matters during that time in good faith, trusting the veracity of Dr. Horton's accounts, but I can no longer stand by the truth of all her reportage given the recent numerous lies, denials, distortions of truth, inability to acknowledge her own statements, and extremely verbally-abusive behavior she has currently leveled at members and former members of the Joint Investigation Team, including Melanie Vritschan, the founder of ICATOR, myself, and Dr. Millicent Black, as well as the duplicitous behaviors of mirroring/echo-stalking/gaslighting and defamatory, slanderous remarks she has directed at myself. (Some of these lies and denials, along with the duplicitousness and defamation, were addressed in my written statement, The End of Techno Crime Fighters Forum: The Real Backstory, some of them have been newly detected in podcasts by Melanie Vritschan, some of them have been newly discerned by us through internal conversations, and some (the most concerning/addressed below) remain in question.) Prompting this disclaimer is the fact that Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • “Does My Story Matter?” Seeking Asylum at Mexico’S Southern Border
    “Does my story matter?” Seeking Asylum at Mexico’s Southern Border Introduction violence perpetrated by gangs and security forces resulting in forced displacement, extortion, sexual and gender-based violence, severe limitations on access n the summer of 2014, former U.S. President to education for children, and internal displacement Obama deemed the increased flow of due to the construction of megaprojects.6 It is not unaccompanied children and families arriving at I surprising then that asylum applications from the the U.S. southern border, many seeking protection, Northern Triangle countries of Central America have an “urgent humanitarian situation.”1 As the number remained steady through 2016.7 of apprehensions of children and families, primarily from the Northern Triangle countries of Central Mexico, on the other hand, closed 2016 with a record America—Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador—hit total of 8,788 asylum applications, more than double record highs, the number of asylum applications also compared to 2015 and quadruple compared to 2014. skyrocketed. However, this trend was not limited to Over 90 percent of these were from Guatemala, the United States. Throughout the region, including in Honduras, and El Salvador. Asylum applications from Belize, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua, asylum applications the end of 2016 through March 2017 demonstrate also increased twelve-fold between 2008 and 2014.2 a continued increase, with 150 percent increase Fast forward three years and in the United States, apprehensions of individuals and families at the U.S.- Mexico border have dropped in the first few months TABLE OF CONTENTS of 2017 compared to figures for the same period in 2016.3 However, it is too early to tell whether this 1 Introduction is a trend that will continue and meanwhile, the 2 Executive Summary conditions in Central America driving this migration remain largely unchanged—the high levels of gang 4 U.S.
    [Show full text]