1:20-Cv-02093 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/02/20 Page 1 of 48 Pageid #:1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Federal Court Prison Litigation Project Revised Handbook
FEDERAL COURT PRISON LITIGATION PROJECT REVISED HANDBOOK April 2002 Prepared With a Grant from the Federal District Court of the Northern District of Illinois by James P.Chapman Eric Dorkin Sarah Geraghty PART I CHAPTER 1: FINDING YOUR CLIENT ...........................................2 SECTION 1: PRISON LOCATOR SERVICES ........................................2 CHAPTER 2: PREPARING YOUR CASE ...........................................3 SECTION 2: ASSESSING THE COMPLAINT. .......................................3 SECTION 3: THE DECISION TO SUE DEFENDANTS IN OFFICIAL/INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY ......4 SECTION 4: REQUESTING STATE PRISON RECORDS ................................5 SECTION 5: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM .........................6 CHAPTER 3: VISITING YOUR CLIENT .......................................... 7 SECTION 6: PREPARING TO VISIT YOUR CLIENT ..................................7 SECTION 7: VISITING YOUR CLIENT ...........................................9 SECTION 8: TELEPHONE PROCEDURES .........................................11 SECTION 9: HOUSING CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS ............12 CHAPTER 4: INTERVIEWING YOUR CLIENT ....................................14 SECTION 10: CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ENTRANCE PROCEDURES ....................14 SECTION 11: THE CLIENT INTERVIEW .........................................14 SECTION 12: RELATIONSHIP WITH CLIENT DURING THE LITIGATION ..................15 CHAPTER 5: ATTACHMENT OF DAMAGE AWARDS ..............................17 SECTION 13: INTRODUCTION ...............................................17 -
Tamms Correctional Center
Tamms Correctional Center Public Comments As of 05/21/2012 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Hearing on the Proposed Closure of Tamms Correctional Center Submitted to the Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability April 2, 2012 ACLU National Prison Project ACLU of Illinois David Fathi, Director Mary Dixon, Legislative Director The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), founded in 1920, is a nationwide, non-profit, nonpartisan organization of more than 500,000 members dedicated to the principles of liberty and equality embodied in the Constitution and this nation's civil rights laws. Since 1972 the ACLU National Prison Project has worked to ensure that our nation’s prisons comply with the Constitution, domestic law, and international human rights principles. The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization committed to protect and to expand the civil liberties and civil rights of persons in Illinois. The organization has engaged in this constitutionally protected pursuit through public education and advocacy before courts, legislatures, and administrative agencies. The organization has more than 20,000 members and supporters dedicated to protecting and expanding the civil rights and civil liberties guaranteed by the Constitutions and civil rights laws of the United States and the State of Illinois. The ACLU respectfully urges the Commission to approve the permanent closure of Tamms Correctional Center. The damaging effects of solitary confinement are -
Death in America Under Color of Law: Our Long, Inglorious Experience with Capital Punishment
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 13 | Issue 4 Article 1 Spring 2018 Death in America under Color of Law: Our Long, Inglorious Experience with Capital Punishment Rob Warden Center on Wrongful Convictions, Bluhm Legal Clinic, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Daniel Lennard Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP Recommended Citation Rob Warden and Daniel Lennard, Death in America under Color of Law: Our Long, Inglorious Experience with Capital Punishment, 13 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y. 194 (2018). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol13/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2018 by Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law ` Vol. 13, Issue 4 (2018) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy Death in America under Color of Law: Our Long, Inglorious Experience with Capital Punishment Rob Warden* and Daniel Lennard† The authors thank John Seasly and Sam Hart, Injustice Watch reporting fellows, for compiling data presented in the five appendices accompanying the article. INTRODUCTION What follows is a compilation of milestones in the American experience with capital punishment, beginning with the first documented execution in the New World under color of English law more than 400 years ago at Jamestown.1 The man who was executed, George Kendall, became first only because he had been (in the modern vernacular) “ratted out” by the man who otherwise would have been first.2 Maybe Kendall was guilty. -
Containing COVID-19 Outbreaks in Illinois Correctional Settings
Institute of Government and Public Affairs Task Force on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic POLICY SPOTLIGHT | JUNE 30, 2020 Authors Pandemic Behind Bars: Sage Kim, PhD, Associate Professor, Health Policy & Administration, School of Containing COVID-19 Outbreaks Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago in Illinois Correctional Settings Tim Jostrand, MPH, Alumni, Health Policy & Administration, School of ll around the United States, prisons and jails have become Public Health, University of hotspots for COVID-19. Inmates and staff working at state Illinois at Chicago Acorrectional facilities, and those living in the surrounding communities, are all at heightened risk of contracting COVID-19.1 Ali Mirza, Wolff Intern, The Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) is grappling with Institute of Government localized COVID-19 outbreaks and is likely to face more outbreaks and Public Affairs, if proactive measures are not taken to bolster self-hygiene, social University of Illinois distancing, and testing availability. System Robin Fretwell Wilson, Director, Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of Illinois System; Roger and Stephany Joslin Professor of Law, University of Illinois College of Law Contact: Robin Fretwell Wilson, Director, IGPA: (217) 244-1227 1 This Policy Spotlight documents the growing con- cern for the health of the incarcerated population and explores the implication of unabated prison and jail COVID-19 outbreaks for the health of Illinois communities where correctional facilities are located. It argues that jails and prisons are not isolated or removed from the community. Pre- venting COVID-19 transmission in jails and prisons requires steps to ensure that COVID-19 outbreaks within correctional settings do not spill over to the surrounding communities, and that infection does not enter into correctional facilities from the community. -
Federal Court Prison Litigation Project Revised Handbook
FEDERAL COURT PRISON LITIGATION PROJECT REVISED HANDBOOK April 2002 Prepared With a Grant from the Federal District Court of the Northern District of Illinois by James P.Chapman Eric Dorkin Sarah Geraghty PART I CHAPTER 1: FINDING YOUR CLIENT ...........................................2 SECTION 1: PRISON LOCATOR SERVICES ........................................2 CHAPTER 2: PREPARING YOUR CASE ...........................................3 SECTION 2: ASSESSING THE COMPLAINT. .......................................3 SECTION 3: THE DECISION TO SUE DEFENDANTS IN OFFICIAL/INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY ......4 SECTION 4: REQUESTING STATE PRISON RECORDS ................................5 SECTION 5: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM .........................6 CHAPTER 3: VISITING YOUR CLIENT .......................................... 7 SECTION 6: PREPARING TO VISIT YOUR CLIENT ..................................7 SECTION 7: VISITING YOUR CLIENT ...........................................9 SECTION 8: TELEPHONE PROCEDURES .........................................11 SECTION 9: HOUSING CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS ............12 CHAPTER 4: INTERVIEWING YOUR CLIENT ....................................14 SECTION 10: CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ENTRANCE PROCEDURES ....................14 SECTION 11: THE CLIENT INTERVIEW .........................................14 SECTION 12: RELATIONSHIP WITH CLIENT DURING THE LITIGATION ..................15 CHAPTER 5: ATTACHMENT OF DAMAGE AWARDS ..............................17 SECTION 13: INTRODUCTION ...............................................17 -
89103NCJRS.Pdf
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. National Criminal Justice Reference Service nCJrs This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. IJ,g 2 5 1~"2,8 11111 . IM;g 1.0 3 2 [lg 1 . 2.2 ~ W I~ Il.: W I:: rn.4.0 l"- I.:. u 1.1 ",u" [- --- 11111'·25 11111 1.4 11111 1.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A ,{ f~ " ,; I' Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with ! ij the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. " '} Ii It Points of view or opinions stateq. in this document are '/ those of the author(s) and do not represent the official I position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. I ;\ .... I" ) National Institute of Justice " United States DepartlFJent=of Justice Washington, D. C. 20531 / r.:.) .....~ ----10 ~ ---. ~ ---.- ." FOR WANT OF A RECORD ...... 'PROBLEMS IN THE TAANSFEB OF RECORDS FROM THE if, COOK COUNTY JAIL TO THE ILLIN01s' DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS THIS REPORT WAS SPONSORED J6INTLY BY THE FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONS: by CHICAGO LAW ENFORCEMENT STUDY GROUP Paul 8igman 109 N. Dearborn - Suite 303 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 346-1179 Janice Linn, Executive Director ~, 1979 by Chicago Law Enforcement Study Group William A. Geller: Research Director U.S. Department of Justlc:e National Institute of Justice JOHN HOWARD ASSOCIATION This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the 67 East Madison - Suite 1216 person or organization originating it. -
Letter-To-Governor-Pritzker.Pdf
May 6. 2020 Dear Governor Pritzker, While we applaud your administration and the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) for steps already taken to protect prison workers, incarcerated individuals, and communities, we believe more could be done. Individual correctional centers must be more transparent to save lives and ease burdens on the families of those who are incarcerated. Officials are not providing enough information to assess the state of the COVID-19 pandemic in these facilities. While case counts are provided on the IDOC website, that information does not indicate how much testing is being conducted at facilities, nor does include the number of hospitalizations and deaths. We write to ask for both more expansive reporting of IDOC data, which is under your direct authority, and also for data from county jails, which, while not directly under your authority, have almost uniformly abstained from public reporting, putting communities at risk and depriving family members and lawyers critical information with which to make decisions about their loved ones. Better understanding how widespread the pandemic is in prisons, which can only be assessed through broader testing and data reporting throughout all prisons and jails, will allow you and your team, IDOC, county boards, county sherrifs, and wardens to make better decisions and to keep more people out of harm's way. As you have done at Stateville Correctional Center and Sheridan Correctional Center, and as is currently being attempted in Cook County, resources can be directed to the facilities and units most at risk. Our hypothesis based on current data provided on the IDOC website, and more notably, on data that is not being reported by either IDOC or county authorities, is that testing is not being conducted at adequate rates system-wide to stay ahead of the virus.