DOCSLIB.ORG

Media Monitoring

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Media Monitoring MEDIA MONITORING JANUARY – DECEMBER 2015 Prepared by METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK PERIOD PERIOD 1: 1 January – 31 December 2014 PERIOD 2: 1 January – 31 December 2015 MONITORED MEDIA 8 TV Antena 1, PROTV, Realitatea, TVR1 Newspapers Adevărul, Evenimentul Zilei, Jurnalul Naţional , România Liberă TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSED PUBLICATIONS PERIOD 1: 12 393 PERIOD 2: 19 160 REGISTERED INDICATIORS Date of publication, month, media, mentioned people, parties, institutions, subject (who has expressed the opinion), object (to whom the opinion has been expressed) SELECTION OF ANALYSED DATA All materials related to political topics and with mentioned state institutions, political parties and their representatives 1 MENTIONED INDIVIDUALS 2014-2015 ALL MEDIA 36% Victor Ponta 25% 14% Klaus Iohannis 19% 24% Traian Băsescu 10% 6% Liviu Dragnea 8% 7% Elena Udrea 7% 2% Gabriel Oprea 5% 1% Alina Gorghiu 4% 6% Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu 4% 2% Dan Şova 3% 0% Dacian Cioloş 3% 2014 2% Sorin Oprescu 3% 3% 2015 Vasile Blaga 3% 1% Darius Vâlcov 2% 1% Eugen Teodorovici 2% 1% Ion Iliescu 2% 0% Sorin Cîmpeanu 2% 1% Marian Vanghelie 2% 2% Laura Codruţa Kövesi 2% Valeriu Zgonea 2% 2% Base: All individuals mentioned in all analysed politically- 2% Nicolae Bănicioiu 2% related materials 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 2 SHARE OF INDIVIDUALS MENTIONED ON TV 2014-2015 TELEVISION 34% Victor Ponta 25% 12% Klaus Iohannis 18% 6% Elena Udrea 8% 22% Traian Băsescu 7% 6% Liviu Dragnea 7% 2% Gabriel Oprea 5% 1% Alina Gorghiu 4% 5% Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu 4% 0% Dacian Cioloş 3% 2% Sorin Oprescu 3% 2014 2% Dan Şova 3% 0% 2015 Sorin Cîmpeanu 3% 2% Nicolae Bănicioiu 3% 1% Darius Vâlcov 2% 0% Eugen Teodorovici 2% 1% Marian Vanghelie 2% 1% Raed Arafat 2% 3% Vasile Blaga 2% 4% George Becali 2% 2% Base: % of all TV news on politically-related themes Mircea Dușa 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 3 INDIVIDUALS MENTIONED as % of presence in different TV channels – 2015 TELEVISION 23% 22% Victor Ponta 12% 34% 18% 19% Klaus Iohannis 12% 19% 4% 8% Elena Udrea 14% 8% 5% 5% Traian Băsescu 7% 10% 7% 7% Liviu Dragnea 1% 9% TVR1 5% 5% PROTV Gabriel Oprea 4% 5% Antena 1 5% 4% Realitatea Alina Gorghiu 1% 4% 4% Călin Popescu- 3% 1% Tăriceanu 4% 3% 3% Dacian Cioloş 4% 4% 3% 3% Sorin Oprescu 4% 3% Base: % of all TV news on politically-related themes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 4 SHARE OF INDIVIDUALS MENTIONED IN NEWSPAPERS 2014-2015 NEWSPAPERS 37% Victor Ponta 25% 15% Klaus Iohannis 20% 25% Traian Băsescu 12% 6% Liviu Dragnea 8% 7% Elena Udrea 7% 2% Gabriel Oprea 6% 6% Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu 5% 1% Alina Gorghiu 4% 2% Dan Şova 4% 2% Sorin Oprescu 3% 2014 1% Dacian Cioloş 3% 4% 2015 Vasile Blaga 3% 1% Ion Iliescu 3% 2% Laura Codruţa Kövesi 3% 2% Valeriu Zgonea 2% 1% Darius Vâlcov 2% 1% Eugen Teodorovici 2% 8% Dan Voiculescu 2% Marian Vanghelie 1% 2% Base: % of all newspaper articles on politically-related 2% Mircea Geoană 2% themes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 5 INDIVIDUALS MENTIONED as % of presence in different newspapers - 2015 NEWSPAPERS 25% 35% Victor Ponta 30% 18% 20% 20% Klaus Iohannis 18% 15% 12% 10% Traian Băsescu 9% 15% 8% 10% Liviu Dragnea 8% 7% 7% 6% Elena Udrea 8% 11% Romania Libera 6% 7% Gabriel Oprea 6% 5% Adevarul 5% 6% Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu 5% 4% Jurnalul National 4% 4% Alina Gorghiu 3% 4% Evenimentul zilei 4% 6% Dan Şova 5% 3% 3% 3% Base: % of all newspaper articles on politically-related Sorin Oprescu 3% 3% themes 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 6 PARTIES/INSTITUTIONS MENTIONED ALL MEDIA 20% Government of Romania 20% 12% National Anticorruption Directorate 19% 19% Social Democratic Party 18% 14% National Liberal Party 13% 7% Romanian Parliament 13% 4% Chamber of Deputies 6% 3% Romanian Senate 6% 4% Ministry of Justice 5% 2% Romanian Intelligence Service 4% 3% Constitutional Court 4% 2014 3% Ministry of Public Finance 3% 2015 1% National Union for the Progress of Romania 3% 4% Ministry of Health 3% 2% Bucharest City Hall 3% 4% Local authorities 3% 4% European Union 3% 3% Ministry of Education 3% 9% Liberal Democratic Party 3% 1% National Bank of Romania 2% Base: All parties/institutions mentioned in all analysed 2% politically-related news Ministry of Interior Affairs 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 7 PARTIES/INSTITUTIONS MENTIONED ON TV 2014-2015 TELEVISION 9% National Anticorruption Directorate 16% 17% Government of Romania 16% 8% Romanian Parliament 12% 8% Social Democratic Party 9% 6% National Liberal Party 8% 7% Ministry of Justice 7% 3% Romanian Senate 5% 4% Chamber of Deputies 4% 4% Ministry of Health 3% 1% Protesters 3% 2014 1% Unions 3% 2015 2% Ministry of Education 2% 5% Local authorities 2% 1% Romanian Intelligence Service 2% 2% Presidency 2% 3% Bucharest City Hall 2% 2% Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2% 0% National Bank of Romania 2% Constitutional Court 2% Base: All parties/institutions mentioned in all analysed 2% politically-related TV news items 1% Church 2% 0% 10% 2 8 PARTIES/INSTITUTIONS MENTIONED as % of presence in different TV channels - 2015 TELEVISION 13% National Anticorruption 17% 18% Directorate 16% 16% 14% Government of Romania 11% 17% 13% 13% Romanian Parliament 8% 12% 9% 7% Social Democratic Party 2% 14% 8% 4% National Liberal Party 3% 11% TVR1 6% 8% PROTV Ministry of Justice 8% 7% Antena 1 4% 5% Romanian Senate 4% Realitatea 5% 3% 5% Chamber of Deputies 5% 4% 3% 4% Ministry of Health 9% 2% 3% 2% Base: All parties/institutions mentioned in all analysed Protesters 3% 3% politically-related TV news 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 9 PARTIES/INSTITUTIONS MENTIONED IN NEWSPAPERS 2014-2015 NEWSPAPERS 21% Government of Romania 22% 23% Social Democratic Party 21% 14% National Anticorruption Directorate 21% 17% National Liberal Party 16% 6% Romanian Parliament 13% 4% Chamber of Deputies 7% 3% Romanian Senate 7% 2% Romanian Intelligence Service 5% Ministry of Justice 3% 4% 2014 3% Ministry of Public Finance 4% 4% 2015 Constitutional Court 4% 2% National Union for the Progress of Romania 4% 5% European Union 4% 11% Liberal Democratic Party 3% 2% Bucharest City Hall 3% 3% Local authorities 3% 5% Democratic Union of Hungarians in Romania 3% 3% Ministry of Health 3% 2% Base: All parties/institutions mentioned in all analysed Ministry of Interior Affairs 3% politically-related newspaper publications 3% Ministry of Education 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 10 PARTIES/INSTITUTIONS MENTIONED as % of presence in different newspapers – 2015 NEWSPAPERS 27% 24% Government of Romania 21% 19% 25% 23% Social Democratic Party 16% 22% 22% National Anticorruption 22% 16% Directorate 22% 16% 14% National Liberal Party 14% 18% 14% 14% Romanian Parliament 14% 12% 8% Romania Libera 7% Chamber of Deputies 9% 6% Adevarul 7% Jurnalul National 6% Romanian Senate 7% 6% Evenimentul zilei 4% Romanian Intelligence 4% 3% Service 7% 4% 5% Ministry of Justice 3% 5% 5% Base: All parties/institutions mentioned in all analysed 6% Ministry of Public Finance 5% politically-related newspaper publications 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 11 ATTITUDE EXPRESSED TOWARDS KLAUS IOHANNIS 120 0,0 Positive Negative Media rating Media rating -1,0 100 -3.7 -2,0 80 -2,67 -2,62 -2,68 -2,86 -3,0 -3,18 -3,14 -3,43 60 -4,0 -4,86 -4,45 -5,0 40 -5,33 -6,0 -6,31 20 -7,0 -7,33 0 -8,0 12 ATTITUDE EXPRESSED TOWARDS VICTOR PONTA 450 0,0 Positive Negative Media rating 400 Media rating -6,42 -5,0 -8.5 -5,49 -5,13 350 -10,50 -10,0 300 -12,33 -11,82 -12,25 -15,14 -15,0 250 -17,13 200 -20,0 150 -25,25 -25,0 100 -30,0 -30,67 50 -35,0 0 -35,50 -50 -40,0 13 ATTITUDE EXPRESSED TOWARDS LIVIU DRAGNEA 140 0,0 -1,03 -2,34 -2,33 -2,00 120 -4,78 -5,0 -7,00 100 -9,11 -10,00 -10,0 -12,00 80 -15,00 -15,0 60 Media rating -3.8 -20,0 40 -25,0 20 -26,00 -29,00 -30,0 0 -20 -35,0 Positive Negative/Critical Media rating 14 ATTITUDE EXPRESSED TOWARDS GABRIEL OPREA 120 10,0 Positive Negative Media rating 5,0 100 0,00 0,0 -4,50 -1,90 -3,00 -3,00 -3,00 -2,40 -4,00 -5,0 -6,00 80 -10,0 -14,13 -15,0 60 -17,00 Media rating -20,0 -7.8 -25,0 40 -30,0 -35,0 20 -40,0 -42,00 0 -45,0 15 ATTITUDE EXPRESSED TOWARDS TRAIAN BĂSESCU 90 0,0 -1,38 -2,80 80 -8,00 -7,50 -8,10 -8,88 -9,50 -13,00 -10,0 -11,00 70 -20,0 -24,67 60 -30,0 -33,00 50 -40,0 40 Media rating -8.6 -50,0 30 -60,0 20 -69,00 -70,0 10 0 -80,0 Positive Negative Media rating 16 ATTITUDE EXPRESSED TOWARDS ELENA UDREA 350 0,0 -1,67 -5,83 -6,00 -7,00 -11,-10,000 300 -12,67 -13,25 -18,00 -20,00 -20,0 250 -30,0 200 -40,00 -39,00 -40,0 Media rating -50,0 150 -14.5 -60,0 100 -70,0 50 -79,00 -80,0 0 -90,0 Positive Negative Media rating 17 EXPRESSED ATTITUDE TOWARDS OBJECTS ANTENA 1 Analysis of the expressed attitudes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Media Monitoring
    MEDIA MONITORING GRAPHIC REPORT SEPTEMBER – DECEMBER 2013 METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK PERIOD 1 September –31 December2013 MONITORED MEDIA 8 TV Stations News broadcasts of Antena 1, PROTV, Realitatea, TVR1 Newspapers Adevarul, Evenimentul Zilei, Jurnalul National, Romania Libera PUBLICATIONS SELECTION All publications related to political topics, such as state institutions, political parties and political leaders NUMBER OF ANALYZED PUBLICATIONS 3’375 MAIN INDICATORS Date of the publication, month, media, mentioned institutions, political parties, leaders, subject (who has expressed the opinion) and object (to whom the opinion has been expressed) 2 MOST MENTIONED POLITICIANS Victor‐Viorel Ponta 1084 Traian Băsescu 833 Crin Antonescu 520 Liviu Nicolae Dragnea 204 Sorin Oprescu 140 Valeriu Ştefan Zgonea 128 Dan Voiculescu 110 Eugen Gheorghe Nicolăescu 92 George Becali 84 Daniel Chițoiu 78 Ramona‐Nicole Mănescu 73 Elena Udrea 72 Varujan Vosganian 56 Dan‐Coman Şova 56 Daniel Constantin 50 Adrian Năstase 50 Radu Stroe 48 Emil Boc 46 Laura Codruța Kovesi 46 The data is represented in information units Monica Macovei 44 September-December 2013 3 MOST MENTIONED POLITICIANS as a % of publications in the respective media September-December 2013 4 MOST MENTIONED POLITICIANS as a % of publications in the respective media September-December 2013 5 EXPRESSED ATTITUDES TOWARDS TRAIAN BĂSESCU 140 0 Media Rating -3.8 120 ‐1 100 ‐2 80 ‐3 60 ‐4 40 ‐5 20 ‐6 0 ‐7 September October November December Positive Negative Media Rating 6 EXPRESSED ATTITUDES TOWARDS VICTOR-VIOREL
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media-PR Tools for Romanian Politicians?
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 81 ( 2013 ) 116 – 121 1st World Congress of Administrative & Political Sciences (ADPOL-2012) Social Media - PR Tools for Romanian Politicians? Antonio Momoc a* aUniversity of Bucharest, Faculty of Journalism and Communication Sciences, Iuliu Maniu Bvd, 1-3, district 6, Bucharest, 06107, Romania Abstract While the social media optimists believe online political communication implies a bigger participation of the audience, this study shows that politicians are preoccupied with their political image and less concerned of building a dialogue with their voters. Our hypothesis is that politicians use online communication to build a certain image and they use social media less for developing a relationship with their target audience. The content analysis method was applied on the Facebook accounts and on blogs belonging to the leaders of the Romanian parliamentary parties at two different moments: January-February 2012 riots and July- August 2012 Referendum campaign. 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer review under the responsibility of Prof. Dr. Andreea Iluzia Iacob. Selection and peer review under the responsibility of Prof. Dr. Andreea Iluzia Iacob. Key-words: Public Relations, Social Media, Political Communication, Target-Audience 1. Introduction From the street movements initiated on Facebook and developed in the large cities of Romania in January 2012, to personal attacks made by politicians on blogs, social media are being used by the Romanian politicians to continuously communicate with the target-audience or to attack the competition. The optimist ideology of social media participation claims that internet grants the possibility to contest power (Ulmanu, 2011, p.141).
    [Show full text]
  • Mediafreedom in Romania 2 0
    FRE E E X R E P O R T M E D I A FREEDOM I N R O M A N I A 2014 - 2015 - Member of the Reporters without Borders Network - And IFEX 2014 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 General context................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Ethics In The Mass-Media. Abandoning Media Mission ................................................................................................. 13 Corrupt Media Financing Mechanisms ........................................................................................................................... 13 Constanța local barons, accused of using the press for corruption purposes ............................. 14 Mayor Marian Vanghelie, OTV and B1 TV advertising contract agent ...................................... 15 Party trolls paid with bribe money .............................................................................. 15 Dan Voiculescu and Intact Media – a new criminal investigation for blackmail ........................... 15 POLITICAL PROPAGANDA ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Political instrumentalization of the protests by the political party televisions .......................... 16 Antena 3 fights against the Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANIA Neither “Fleishig” Nor “Milchig”: a Comparative Study
    hn hk io il sy SY ek eh Chapter Four hn hk io il sy SY ek eh hn hk io il sy SY ek eh hn hk io il sy SY ek eh hn hk io il sy SY ek eh ROMANIA Neither “Fleishig” nor “Milchig”: A Comparative Study Michael Shafir Right a fter the change of regime in December 1989, Romania displayed some features that were common to most postcommunist East­C entral Eu­ ro pean countries in regard to antisemitism, as well as some specific features of its own. Freed from ideological and censorship constraints, latent anti­ semitism erupted in the public space, and after a while it became a cross­ party phenomenon. This does not mean that po liti cal parties had all put antisemitism on their banners; it rather means that regardless of ideology, both antisemitic prejudice and, above all, the perception of Romania’s “dark past”1 of the interwar period and the Second World War, as well as the role Jews had allegedly played in the early stage of communism, figured in simi­ lar shades, if not intensity, in all po liti cal formations. The “dark past” was by and large ignored and occasionally justified, while the claim about the Jews was overemphasized in what turned out to be a re nais sance of the “Judeo­ Bolshevik” myth.2 All of these ele ments were common to most East­ Central Eu ro pean countries. This is not to say that diferences between attitudes w ere not noticeable. One could, for example, distinguish between: (a) self­ exculpatory nostalgic -1— antisemitism, or parties and movements of a “radical return” to models of 0— the interwar radical right; (b) self­
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union in the Process of Combating
    TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY School of Business and Governance Department of Law Andreea Cristina Prasacu THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE PROCESS OF COMBATING CORRUPTION – CASE STUDY ROMANIA Master's thesis Supervisor: Prof. Peeter Müürsepp Tallinn 2017 I have written the Bachelor's/Master's thesis independently All works and major viewpoints of the other authors, data from other sources of literature and elsewhere used for writing this paper have been referenced. Andreea Cristina Prasacu ................................... (signature, date) Student‟s code: 157334TASM E-mail address: [email protected] Supervisor Prof. Peeter Müürsepp: The thesis conforms to the requirements for the master's theses ..................................................... (signature, date) Chairman of the Defence Committee Permitted to defence ……………………………….. (Title, name, signature, date) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 7 1. METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 11 1.1. Research Methods: Case study and Critical discourse analysis .............................. 11 1.1.1. The aims of case study ..................................................................................... 12 1.1.2. Critique of case study ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Core Story on the Evening of 31.01.2017 the Romanian
    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ON ROMANIA’S ANTICORRUPTION IMPLOSION European Centre for Anticorruption and State Building, www.againstcorruption.eu, www.romaniacurata.ro, http://sar.org.ro/?lang=en , www.integrity-index.org Core story On the evening of 31.01.2017 the Romanian government chaired by Sorin Grindeanu adopted as a government ordinance a bill (Ordinance 13/2017) proposing amendments to Law no.268/2009 on the Criminal Code and Law 135/2010 on Criminal Code procedures. The government claimed that the changes were imposed by Romania’s overcrowding prisons and repeated cases lost at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, who had threatened with a larger fine if some prison reform would not have been implemented. Romania has the largest number of prisoners in other EU member countries from all EU MS, besides a nearly double occupancy by domestic prisoners in the country. The government has the right to pass emergency ordinances, which become immediately enforced and are only later submitted to Parliamentary approval, and Criminal Code has been changed before in this way. Each government for the past twelve years has pledged to stop favouring this way of legislating over normal procedures, but in fact this has become the default way to pass bills due to high transaction costs in the Parliament. The other motive invoked by the government was that the Constitutional Court ruled in May 2016 as unconstitutional an article on power abuse asking for clarification1. The Court motivated with the Council of Europe (Venice Commission) report2, which asks that this notion is well specified to prevent the political abuse of anticorruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Backsliding and Resilience In
    Ruxandra Paul Assistant Professor, Political Science Department, Amherst College Visiting Scholar, Center for European Studies, Harvard University [email protected] * [email protected] September 20, 2019 Citizens of the Market Migration’s Rescue of Liberal Democracy and the European Union Thirty years after the fall of communism in 1989, the political trajectories of Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries continue to defy expectations. The early 1990s were dominated by concerns over the likelihood that democracy will not take root in CEE. Some predicted the erosion of support for democracy as a result of economic reforms (Przeworski, 1991), while others thought that “the danger of new dictatorship in Eastern Europe comes from the bottom, not from the top” (Ost, 1992). The mid-1990s and early 2000s brought reassurance that democratic CEE polities worked fairly well (Levitz and Pop-Eleches, 2010; Roberts, 2009). Some saw the region as an “unqualified democratic success story” and declared earlier analogies with Latin America misplaced (Greskovits, 1998). The first couple of decades after the end of the Cold War seemed to bode well for postcommunist new democracies. Since 2004, eleven CEE have countries joined the European Union (EU). Many noted that Poland and Hungary had rapidly consolidated (Linz and Stepan, 1996) and thought they “passed the point of no return” making “authoritarian reversal” inconceivable (Ekiert and Kubik, 1998). In the 2000s, however, it became clear that earlier optimism had been somewhat premature. Some warned of “democratic fatigue” and populist backlash (Rupnik, 2007). What was most puzzling, however, was the uneven way in which backsliding affected the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania's Politics on Fire: Why Victor Ponta Resigned and What It Means
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/11/05/romanias-politics-on-fire-why-victor-ponta-resigned-and-what-it-means-for-the-country/ Romania’s politics on fire: Why Victor Ponta resigned and what it means for the country A tragic accident at a Bucharest nightclub resulted in 32 people losing their lives and triggered a series of events that culminated in the resignation of Romanian Prime Minister Victor Ponta on 4 November. Ponta was already under significant pressure to quit following corruption allegations, but had resisted handing in his resignation until now. Why this change of heart? Dan Brett provides a comprehensive analysis of the situation and points out that, for Ponta, resigning over an accident he could not be blamed for was the easiest way out. Despite Ponta’s resignation, widespread anger at perceived political corruption has ensured protests have continued on the streets of Romanian towns and cities, with even the country’s popular President Klaus Iohannis potentially in the firing line. Victor Ponta’s resignation as Romania’s Prime Minister on the morning of 4 November, after 20,000 people protested on the streets of Bucharest the day before, came as something of a surprise. Ponta – who had survived protests since becoming Prime Minister, had been accused of plagiarism and corruption, was heavily defeated in the Presidential elections, and was facing court cases for corruption – had so far refused to quit. Now, following the deaths of 32 people in a fire at the Colectiv Club in Bucharest, he has finally resigned.
    [Show full text]
  • Klaus Iohannis
    MONITORIZAREA MASS–MEDIA IANUARIE – DECEMBRIE 2015 Pregătit de CADRUL METODOLOGIC PERIOADĂ PERIOADĂ 1: 1 Ianuarie – 31 Decembrie 2014 PERIOADĂ 2: 1 Ianuarie – 31 Decembrie 2015 MASS–MEDII MONITORIZATE 8 Televiziune Antena 1, PROTV, Realitatea, TVR1 Cotidiene Adevărul, Evenimentul Zilei, Jurnalul Naţional, România Liberă NUMĂR TOTAL ANALIZATE PERIOADĂ 1: 12 393 PERIOADĂ 2: 19 160 INDICATORII DE ÎNREGISTRARE Data publicării, lună, mass-media, persoane menționate, partide, instituții, subiect (care exprimă evaluarea), obiect (evaluat) SELECŢIA DE MATERIALELE ANALIZATE Toate materiale pe probleme politice, în care sunt menţionate instituții de stat, partide politice și reprezentanții acestora 1 PERSOANE VIZATE 2014-2015 TOATE MASS-MEDIA 36% Victor Ponta 25% 14% Klaus Iohannis 19% 24% Traian Băsescu 10% 6% Liviu Dragnea 8% 7% Elena Udrea 7% 2% Gabriel Oprea 5% 1% Alina Gorghiu 4% 6% Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu 4% 2% Dan Şova 3% 2014 0% Dacian Cioloş 3% 2% 2015 Sorin Oprescu 3% 3% Vasile Blaga 3% 1% Darius Vâlcov 2% 1% Eugen Teodorovici 2% 1% Ion Iliescu 2% 0% Sorin Cîmpeanu 2% 1% Marian Vanghelie 2% 2% Laura Codruţa Kövesi 2% 2% Valeriu Zgonea 2% Referință: % din totalul persoanelor vizate în materiale 2% politice În toate mass- medie Nicolae Bănicioiu 2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 2 COTELE PERSOANELOR VIZATE, LA TELEVIZIUNE 2014-2015 TELEVIZIUNE 34% Victor Ponta 25% 12% Klaus Iohannis 18% 6% Elena Udrea 8% 22% Traian Băsescu 7% 6% Liviu Dragnea 7% 2% Gabriel Oprea 5% 1% Alina Gorghiu 4% 5% Călin Popescu-Tăriceanu 4% 0% Dacian Cioloş 3%
    [Show full text]
  • East European Journal of Society and Politics
    Volume 4 • Number 4 • 2018 East European Journal of Society and Politics Intersections. EEJSP H-1453 Budapest, Editor-in-Chief: Margit Feischmidt PO Box 25. Editors: Attila Bartha, Nóra Kovács, Miklós Könczöl, Zsolt Körtvélyesi, Bence Ságvári, Gabriella Szabó Copy Editors: Simon Milton Chris Swart Editorial Manager: István Hegedűs The current issue was supported by: PUBLISHED BY: Centre for Social Sciences Hungarian Academy of Sciences Tamás Rudas Director General intersections.tk.mta.hu Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics is an Open Access, double blind peer-reviewed online journal. When citing an article, please use the article’s DOI identifier. Table of Contents ALPER BAYSAN Taking Signals Seriously: EU Membership Credibility and Rule Transfer from the Acquis Communautaire to Candidate Countries 4 RADU MEZA, HANNA ORSOLYA VINCZE AND ANDREEA MOGOȘ Targets of Online Hate Speech in Context. A Comparative Digital Social Science Analysis of Comments on Public Facebook Pages from Romania and Hungary 26 VENDULA PROKUPKOVA Two Mobilization Waves of the Czech Anti-Islam Movement. Collective Actors and the Identity Change of the Movement 2015-2016 51 PIOTR KOCYBA Pegida: A Movement of Right-Wing Extremists or Simply ‘Concerned Citizens’? 72 MICHAL VÍT AND JUDIT TÓTH The Changing Dynamics of the Effective Protection of EU External Borders or/and Forced Migrants 89 JÚLIA SZALAI AND SARA SVENSSON On Civil Society and the Social Economy in Hungary 107 ONDŘEJ SLAČÁLEK The Leadership of the Czech Far Right 1990-2017: Changes in Practical Ideology? 125 Book Reviews Sik, Domonkos (2016) Radicalism and Indifference: Memory Transmission, Political Formation and Modernization in Hungary and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in ROMANIA 2Nd November 2014
    PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN ROMANIA 2nd November 2014 European Elections monitor Social Democrat Prime Minister Victor Ponta, favourite in the Presidential election on Romania Corinne Deloy Abstract : 18.3 million Romanians will be appointing their president on 2nd November next. If none of the 14 candidates running wins the absolute majority in the first round, a second will be organised on 16th November. Outgoing head of State Traian Basescu, who is ending his second term, is not Analysis allowed to stand for re-election. The present Prime Minister Victor Ponta (Social every four years within 41 constituencies using a mix Democratic Party PSD) is running favourite in the majority system. The Upper Chamber, the Senate, has election. According to the most recent poll by CSCI he 143 members and the lower chamber, the Chamber of is due to win 42% of the vote ahead of Klaus Johannis Deputies (Camera Deputatilor) 346. National minorities with 37%. Calin Popescu-Tariceanu is due to come (Roma, Germans, Armenians, Italians, Croatians, third with 9% of the vote, ahead of Elena Udrea (6%), Albanians, Serbs etc.) have a number of seats reserved Dan Diaconescu (5%), Kelemen Humor (4%), Monica for them in the Chamber of Deputies (18). Macovei (3%) and Cornelio Vadim Tudor (2%). Two- thirds of the Romanians (68%) said they were going to 14 people are officially running for the presidential vote on 2nd November. office: 294 polling stations will be open abroad so that expat – Victor Ponta (Social Democratic Party, PSD), Prime Romanians can vote. During the last presidential Minister since 7th May 2012 and Chairman of the Social election on 22nd November and 6th December 2009 Democratic Party since 21st February 2010; 146,000 turned out to vote – a record number.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Romanian Press in Reporting Political Corruption
    The Role of the Romanian Press in Reporting Political Corruption Lorela Viorica Broucher A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April, 2016 1 "This work is the intellectual property of the author. You may copy up to 5% of this work for private study, or personal, non-commercial research. Any re-use of the information contained within this document should be fully referenced, quoting the author, title, university, degree level and pagination. Queries or requests for any other use, or if a more substantial copy is required, should be directed in the owner(s) of the Intellectual Property Rights.” Supervisors: Dr. Simon Cross, Nottingham Trent University Dr. Olga Guedes Bailey, Nottingham Trent University 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 Acknowledgements 7 Abstract 8 Introduction to the Thesis 9 The Importance of Romania 9 The Problem of Corruption 10 Research Questions and Aims 11 The Thesis Chapters in Brief 12 Chapter 1: Media and Democracy 14 1 Liberal Democracy and the Media 14 1.1 Liberal Democracy Vs Neoliberalism 14 1.2 Liberal Democracy 16 1.3 Freedom of Expression and Democracy 18 1.4 Media and Democracy 19 1.5 Media Holding Power to Account 21 1.6 Criticising the Liberal Model of the Media: The Critical Political Economy of Media Approach 23 1.6.1 Critical Political Economy of the Media 23 1.6.2 Critical Political Economy of the Media and the Post-Communist World 27 1.7 Keeping Media Accountable 29 2 The Post-Communist World: Romania
    [Show full text]