DOCSLIB.ORG

Protecting Children in Substance-Abusing Families

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protecting Children in Substance-Abusing Families Protecting Children in Substance-Abusing Families Vickie Kropenske and Judy Howard with Cheryl Breitenbach Richard Dembo Susan B. Edelstein Kathy McTaggart Annette Moore Mary Beth Sorensen Virginia Weisz 1994 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families Administration on Children, Youth and Families National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect This manual was developed and produced by Circle Solutions, Inc., McLean, VA, under subcontract No. S-105-89-1730 with Westover Consultants, Inc. This page is intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xi INTRODUCTION xiii IDENTIFYING ALCOHOL AND/OR OTHER DRUG USE 1 Physical and Behavioral Indications of Substance Abuse in Families 1 Physical and Behavioral Indications of Perinatal Substance Abuse 2 Physical and Behavioral Indications of Relapse for Individuals in Recovery 2 Diagnostic Tests for Alcohol Use 2 Toxicology Screening for Drug Use 3 Summary 4 CHEMICALLY INVOLVED PARENTS : CHARACTERISTICS OF PARENTS AT RISK 5 The Nature of Substance Abuse 6 The Chemically Involved Parent 8 Childhood Deprivation 8 Survival Needs 8 Psychiatric Disorders 9 Denial 9 The Needs of Children and Parenting Tasks 10 Summary 11 CHILDREN OF CHEMICALLY INVOLVED PARENTS : SPECIAL RISKS 13 Neonatal and Infant Complications 14 Neurological Symptoms 14 Prematurity 16 Intracranial Hemorrhages 16 Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) 16 Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) 17 Diseases That Interfere With Normal Feeding Ability 17 Infectious Diseases 17 Gonorrhea 18 Syphilis 18 iii Herpes 18 Chlamydia 18 Hepatitis B 19 Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) 19 Tuberculosis (TB) 20 Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) 21 Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) 21 Failure To Thrive (FTT) 21 Intrauterine Growth Retardation (IUGR) 22 Central Nervous System (CNS) Disorders 22 Medical Followup Recommendations 23 Developmental Concerns 25 Developmental Assessment 25 Developmental Patterns of Prenatally Drug-Exposed Children 26 Infancy (0 to 15 Months) 26 Toddlerhood (15 to 36 Months) 28 Preschool Years (3 to 5 Years) 29 School and Teenage Years 30 Summary 31 REPORTING CHILD MALTREATMENT IN CASES INVOLVING PARENTAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE 33 Reporting Obligations 33 Reporting Parental Substance Abuse 33 Reporting Substance Abuse During Pregnancy 33 Reporting Drug- and Alcohol-Affected Infants 34 Variations in Reporting 34 Confidentiality 34 COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY ASSESSMENT 39 Gathering Information 40 Interviews With Family Members 40 Home Visits 40 Collateral Contacts 40 Standardized Evaluations 40 Areas of Assessment 41 iv Assessment of the Infant and Child 41 Infant Assessment 41 Child Assessment 42 Assessment of the Adolescent 42 Assessment of the Parent 44 Substance Abuse History 44 Drug and Alcohol Treatment History 46 Health and Health Care 46 Mental Health and History of Psychiatric Treatment 46 Criminal History 47 Level of Cooperation 47 Awareness of the Impact of Drug and Alcohol Use on the Child 48 Parenting Skills and Responsiveness to Child 48 History of Abuse and/or Neglect 49 Work History and Education 49 Assessment of the Home Environment 49 Environmental Conditions of the Home 50 Partners or Parent Substitutes Within the Home 51 Family Support Systems 51 Assessment of Relative Caregivers 51 Parenting Skills and History of Abuse, Neglect, or Violence 52 Alcohol Use and/or Other Drug Use 52 Quality of the Relationship With the Parent and Ability to Protect and Nurture the Child 52 Cooperation, Receptivity, and Access to Services 53 Assessment of Foster Parents 53 Attitudes Toward Birth Parents 54 Caregiving 54 Perception and Expectations of the Child 54 Receptivity to Services 55 Family Supports 55 Guides for Assessment 55 Summary 56 v JUVENILE COURT INVOLVEMENT WITH CHEMICALLY INVOLVED FAMILIES 61 Considerations of the Juvenile Court in Cases of Parental Substance Abuse 62 Child's Health and Psychosocial Status 62 Child's Age 62 Parental History of Substance Abuse and Treatment 63 Parenting Profile 63 Home Environment 64 Family Supports 64 Treatment and Support Services 64 Special Issues Affecting Legal Interventions With Chemically Involved Families 65 Reasonable Efforts 65 Realistic Time Frames 66 Termination of Parental Rights 66 Permanent Placement 68 Adoption 68 Guardianship 68 Long-Term Foster Care 69 Summary 69 INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO INTERVENTION: IMPROVING THE ODDS 71 Comprehensive Treatment Approaches 71 Programs for Pregnant and Parenting Women With Children 71 Residential Treatment 72 Specialized Child Protective Services (CPS) Units 73 Family Preservation Programs 73 Innovations in Out-Of-Home Care 74 Transitional Group Care for Foster Children 74 Specialized Foster Homes 74 Foster Parent Training 75 Grandparent Support Groups 76 Meeting Health and Educational Needs 76 Comprehensive Health Care Clinics for Substance-Affected Children 76 Early Childhood Programs 77 Support Programs for Parents 77 vi Twelve-Step Programs 77 Programs for Adolescents 78 Programs for Incarcerated Women 78 Day Treatment Programs for Pregnant Women and Their Husbands/Partners 79 Interagency Approaches 79 Interagency Coordinating Councils 79 Interagency, Interdisciplinary Training 80 Interagency Service Teams 80 Summary 81 CONCLUSION 83 APPENDICES Appendix I: The Nature of Substances of Abuse 85 Appendix II: Sample Medical Center Protocol 97 Appendix III: Sample Interagency Agreement 109 NOTES 113 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 117 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 121 OTHER RESOURCES 127 TABLES Table 1. Hospital Form for Discharge of Infants into Out-of-Home Care 24 Table 2. Sample Interagency Consent Form 37 Table 3. Assessment/Intervention Guide: Biologic Family 57 Table 4. Assessment/Intervention Guide: Relative Caregiver 59 Table 5. Assessment/Intervention Guide: Foster Family 60 Table 6. Major Substances of Abuse 95 vii This page is intentionally left blank PREFACE The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act was signed into law in 1974. Since that time, the Federal Government has served as a catalyst to mobilize society's social service, mental health, medical, educational, legal, and law enforcement resources to address the challenges in the prevention and treatment of child abuse and neglect. In 1977, in one of its early efforts to achieve this goal, the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect (NCCAN) developed 21 manuals (the User Manual Series) to provide guidance to professionals involved in the child protection system and to enhance community collaboration and the quality of services provided to children and families. The manuals described each professional's roles and responsibilities in the prevention, identification, and treatment of child maltreatment. Other manuals in the series addressed special topics, for example, adolescent abuse and neglect. Our understanding of the complex problems of child abuse and neglect has increased dramatically since the user manuals were developed. This increased knowledge has improved our ability to intervene effectively in the lives of troubled families. Likewise, we have a better grasp of what we can do to prevent child abuse and neglect from occurring. Further, our knowledge of the unique roles key professionals can play in child protection has been more clearly defined, and a great deal has been learned about how to enhance coordination and collaboration of community agencies and professionals. Finally, we are facing today new and more serious problems in families who maltreat their children. For example, there is a significant percentage of families known to Child Protective Services (CPS) who are experiencing substance abuse problems. Because our knowledge base has increased significantly and the state of the art of practice has improved considerably, NCCAN has updated the User Manual Series by revising many of the existing manuals and creating new manuals that address current innovations, concerns, and issues in the prevention and treatment of child maltreatment. This manual, Protecting Children in Substance-Abusing Families, is designed for professionals in the fields of child welfare, mental health, health care, education, law, the faith community, and substance abuse prevention and treatment. The manual is intended to help professionals identify the various forms of parental substance abuse, assess the strengths and needs of families affected by alcohol and/or other drug abuse, develop service plans, and provide intervention. The manual includes a section addressing the identification of substance-abusing clients, a review of the characteristics of substance-abusing parents and the risks to children growing up in households in which alcohol and/or other drugs are abused, a discussion of the legal issues related to child maltreatment and parental substance abuse, a description of approaches to family assessment, and a summary of innovative intervention programs and service delivery strategies. Protecting Children in Substance-Abusing Families is one in a series of User Manuals developed by the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect. Initiated in 1977, and now being updated, the User Manual Series provide guidance to professionals involved in the child protection system. Some manuals focus specifically on professional roles and responsibilities in the prevention, identification, and treatment of child abuse and neglect, such as The Role of Educators in the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Other manuals focus on special topics, such as Treatment for Abused and Neglected Children: Infancy to Age 18. Readers are encouraged to review
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CHALLENGING CASES: BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL PEDIATRICS Failure to Thrive in a 4-Month-Old Nursing Infant
    CHALLENGING CASES: BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL PEDIATRICS Failure to Thrive in a 4-Month-Old Nursing Infant* CASE visits she was observed to respond quickly to visual Christine, a 4-month-old infant, is brought to the and auditory cues. There was no family history of office for a health-supervision visit by her mother, serious diseases. a 30-year-old emergency department nurse. The In that a comprehensive history and physical ex- mother, who is well known to the pediatrician to be amination did not indicate an organic cause, the a competent and attentive caregiver, appears unchar- pediatrician reasoned that the most likely cause of acteristically tired. They are accompanied by the 18- her failure to thrive was an unintentional caloric month-old and 4-year-old siblings because child care deprivation secondary to maternal stress and ex- was unavailable, and her husband has been out of haustion. Christine’s mother and the pediatrician town on business for the last 5 weeks. When the discussed how maternal stress, fatigue, and depres- pediatrician comments, “You look exhausted. It must sion could hinder the let-down reflex and reduce the be really tough to care for 3 young children,” the availability of an adequate milk supply, as well as mother appears relieved that attention was given to make it difficult to maintain regular feeding sessions. her needs. She reports that she has not been getting The pediatrician recommended obtaining help with much sleep because Christine wakes up for 2 or more child care and household responsibilities. The evening feedings and the toddler is now awakening mother was also encouraged to consume adequate at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Records As Sources for Social History
    Case Records as Sources for Social History by G.J. PARR A decade ago the first studies of geographic and social mobility based on manuscript census returns, city directories and parish records were accorded a richly deserved welcome as the "new social history." Reviewers suggested that this quantitative work would lend healthy depth and precision to more traditionally-based inquiries into the daily life of the labouring and unlettered in the nineteenth century. ' In many ways the new history has fulfilled this prorni~e.~Our understanding of the ethnic, demographic and occupational complexion of rural and increasingly urban communities on both sides of the Atlantic has been substantially enriched. Yet this new quantitative precision has not been so successfully married with depth as had been hoped. Recent work employing more traditional mlthodology has often succeeded better in illuminating the texture of life among the "submerged" four-tenths of the last ~entury.~ With the admirable eclecticism which distinguishes the profession, historians have reached across their worktables stacked high with Among the most enduring of these earlier works are: E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (London: V. Gollancz, 1963); Eric Hobsbawm, Lgbouring Men (London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1964) and Primitive Rebels (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1959); Oscar Handlin, The Uprooted (Boston: Little, Brown, 1951); Caroline Ware, The Early New England Cotton Manufacture (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 193 1). See, for example, D.V. Glass and D.E.C. Eversley, eds., Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography (Chicago: Aldine, 1965); Peter Laslett and Richard Well, eds., Household and Family in Past Time (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972); Stephan Thernstrom, Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964); Stephan Thernstrom and Richard Sennett, eds., Nineteenth Century Cities (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969).
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Threshold Enactments (2009-2015) 2015
    NCSL: Drug Threshold Enactments 2009-2015 Page | 1 Drug Threshold Enactments (2009-2015) 2015 Alabama SB 67 Lowers from a class C to class D felony first degree possession of marijuana if the person possesses marijuana for personal use after previously being convicted of certain marijuana possession offenses. Connecticut HB 7104 Reduces from a felony to a class A misdemeanor possession of any amount of illegal drug. Reduces from a felony to a class A misdemeanor possession of a half-ounce or more of marijuana. Kentucky SB 192 Creates a new class C felony of importing heroin and a new class B felony of aggravated trafficking in a controlled substance in the first degree if the substance trafficked was 100 grams or more of heroin. Increases the penalty from a class A misdemeanor to a class D felony for drug trafficking that involves more than 120 dosage units. Louisiana HB 149 Creates graduated penalties for first time possession of marijuana offenses by weight, reduces penalties for second and third convictions for possession of marijuana offenses, and creates a penalty for fourth conviction of possession of marijuana. • First offense possession of less than 14 grams of marijuana is punishable by not more than 15 days in jail and not more than $300. • First offense possession of more than 14 grams but less than two and a half pounds of marijuana is punishable by not more than six months jail and not more than $500. • Reduces second offense possession of marijuana from not more than 5 years and not less than $250 but not more than $2,000, to not more than 6 months in jail and nor more than $1,000.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dose-Response Relationship Between Organic Mercury Exposure from Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
    Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 9156-9170; doi:10.3390/ijerph110909156 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ISSN 1660-4601 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Article A Dose-Response Relationship between Organic Mercury Exposure from Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines and Neurodevelopmental Disorders David A. Geier 1, Brian S. Hooker 2, Janet K. Kern 1,3, Paul G. King 4, Lisa K. Sykes 4 and Mark R. Geier 1,* 1 Institute of Chronic Illnesses, Inc., 14 Redgate Ct., Silver Spring, MD 20905, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.A.G.); [email protected] (J.K.K.) 2 Department of Biology, Simpson University, 2211 College View Dr., Redding, CA 96003, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5353 Harry Hine Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390, USA 4 CoMeD, Inc., 14 Redgate Ct., Silver Spring, MD 20905, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (P.G.K.); [email protected] (L.K.S.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-301-989-0548; Fax: +1-301-989-1543. Received: 12 July 2014; in revised form: 7 August 2014 / Accepted: 26 August 2014 / Published: 5 September 2014 Abstract: A hypothesis testing case-control study evaluated concerns about the toxic effects of organic-mercury (Hg) exposure from thimerosal-containing (49.55% Hg by weight) vaccines on the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDs). Automated medical records were examined to identify cases and controls enrolled from their date-of-birth (1991–2000) in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) project.
    [Show full text]
  • Participant Handbook
    LOWNDES COUNTY DUI COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK STATE COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY 327 NORTH ASHLEY STREET VALDOSTA, GA 31601 PHONE: 229-671-2895 FAX: 229-671-3441 Lowndes County DUI Court Team: Ellen S. Golden Judge, State Court Cynthia Welch Assistant Solicitor-General Gee Edwards Defense Attorney Stacey Bass Court Coordinator Kayla Porter Probation Officer Laci Rankhorn Treatment Provider Jason Reeves Surveillance Officer Revised 3/1/19 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION TO THE LOWNDES COUNTY STATE COURT DUI COURT.......................... 4 TREATMENT OVERVIEW.................................................................................................................... 6 I. PHASES OF THE DUI COURT PROGRAM........................................................................................7 Phase 1 – (approximately 17 weeks)....................................................................................................7 Phase 2 – (approximately 17 weeks)................................................................................................... 8 Phase 3 – (approximately 17 weeks)................................................................................................... 9 Phase 4 Aftercare- (approximately 3 months)....................................................................................9 Phase Progression.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Evidence for Definitions of Episode, Remission, Recovery, Relapse and Recurrence in Depression: a Systematic Review
    Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences (2019), 28, 544–562. © Cambridge University Press 2018 ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1017/S2045796018000227 Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review P. L. de Zwart1*, B. F. Jeronimus1,2 and P. de Jonge1,2 1 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), Groningen, The Netherlands 2 University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Developmental Psychology, Groningen, The Netherlands Aims. For the past quarter of a century, Frank et al.’s (1991) consensus-based definitions of major depressive disorder (MDD) episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence have been the paramount driving forces for consistency in MDD research as well as in clinical practice. This study aims to review the evidence for the empirical validation of Frank et al.’s proposed concept definitions and to discuss evidence-based modifications. Methods. A literature search of Web of Science and PubMed from 1/1/1991 to 08/30/2017 identified all publications which referenced Frank et al.’s request for definition validation. Publications with data relevant for validation were included and checked for referencing other studies providing such data. Results. A total of 56 studies involving 39 315 subjects were included, mainly presenting data to validate the severity and duration thresholds for defining remission and recovery. Most studies indicated that the severity threshold for defining remission should decrease. Additionally, specific duration thresholds to separate remission from recovery did not add any predictive value to the notion that increased remission duration alleviates the risk of reoccurrence of depressive symp- toms.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanency Practice Framework: Restoration, Adoption and Guardianship Brief Evidence Review
    Permanency Practice Framework: Restoration, Adoption and Guardianship Brief Evidence Review Summary Report 4 May 2020 0 Contributing authors Dr Fiona May, Research Specialist, Parenting Research Centre Kate Spalding, Senior Implementation Specialist, Parenting Research Centre Matthew Burn, Implementation Specialist, Parenting Research Centre Catherine Murphy, Senior Implementation Specialist, Parenting Research Centre Christopher Tran, Implementation Specialist, Parenting Research Centre Warren Cann, Chief Executive Officer, Parenting Research Centre Annette Michaux, Director, Parenting Research Centre May 2020 May, F., Spalding, K., Burn, M., Murphy, C., Tran, C., Cann, W., & Michaux, A. (2020). Permanency Practice Framework: Restoration, Adoption and Guardianship Brief Evidence Review. New South Wales: Parenting Research Centre. Melbourne office Level 5, 232 Victoria Parade East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002 Australia Sydney office Suite 72, Level 7 8-24 Kippax Street Surry Hills, New South Wales, 2010 P: +61 3 8660 3500 E: [email protected] www.parentingrc.org.au Permanency Practice Framework: Restoration, Adoption and Guardianship Brief Evidence Review ii Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Summary of findings 5 2.1 Guardianship and adoption literature 5 2.2 Restoration literature 9 3. References 14 Permanency Practice Framework: Restoration, Adoption and Guardianship Brief Evidence Review iii 1. Introduction The Parenting Research Centre is working in partnership with the Department of Communities and Justice (DCJ) in NSW to develop an evidence-based practice framework to support practitioners in working towards the permanency goals of restoration, guardianship and adoption. The aims of this project are to: 1. Explore and analyse current practice and match against the evidence. 2. Design a practice framework which aligns with evidence-based practice for families and carers of children between 0-18 years who have been placed in out-of-home care and are moving to permanency through restoration, guardianship or adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Disclosure of Relapse for Self-Identified Sexual Addicts
    Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 20:157–170, 2013 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1072-0162 print / 1532-5318 online DOI: 10.1080/10720162.2013.786659 ARTICLES Impact of Disclosure of Relapse for Self-Identified Sexual Addicts M. DEBORAH CORLEY Sante´ Center for Healing, Argyle, Texas SARA E. POLLARD and JOSHUA N. HOOK University of North Texas, Denton, Texas JENNIFER P. SCHNEIDER Tucson, Arizona Disclosure as a process of both recovery and healing within commit- ted relationships is advocated by couple and addiction therapists. The traumatic impact for partners of an initial disclosure or discov- ery of betrayals has been well documented, but less is known about the impact of disclosure for sex addicts. The present study explored the experience of relapse and disclosure among sex addicts. Relapse was a common experience among sex addicts, and the disclosure of relapse had a range of consequences for the addict and the re- lationship. Voluntary disclosure of relapse (rather than the partner discovering relapses independently) was associated with positive relational outcomes. The majority of sexual behaviors engaged in by sexual addicts who are in a committed relationship are considered a violation of trust by their partners (Bird, Butler, & Fife, 2007; Kalichman & Cain, 2004; Young, Griffin-Shelley, Cooper, O’Mara, & Buchanan, 2000). This violation is also considered a betrayal and may be described as a secret sexual, romantic, or emotional involvement that violates the rules of and commitment to an exclusive re- lationship (Glass, 2002; Laaser, 2011; Whisman & Wagers, 2005). The most significant betrayals are those associated with repeated secrets, lies, decep- tions, and broken promises (Corley & Schneider, 2002; Corley, Schneider, Thanks to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pediatric Role in Enhancing Development in Young Children
    CLINICAL REPORT Guidance for the Clinician in Rendering Pediatric Care The Power of Play: A Pediatric Michael Yogman, MD, FAAP,a Andrew Garner, MD, PhD, FAAP, b Jeffrey Hutchinson, MD, FAAP, c RoleKathy Hirsh-Pasek, in PhD, Enhancing d Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, PhD, Development e COMMITTEE ON PSYCHOSOCIAL inASPECTS Young OF CHILD AND FAMILY Children HEALTH, COUNCIL ON COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA Children need to develop a variety of skill sets to optimize their development abstract and manage toxic stress. Research demonstrates that developmentally appropriate play with parents and peers is a singular opportunity to promote the social-emotional, cognitive, language, and self-regulation skills that build executive function and a prosocial brain. Furthermore, play aDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University and Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts; bDepartment supports the formation of the safe, stable, and nurturing relationships with of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Medical Practices, Cleveland, Ohio; cDepartment all caregivers that children need to thrive. of Pediatrics, F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; dDepartment of Psychology, Brookings Play is not frivolous: it enhances brain structure and function and promotes Institution and Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and executive function (ie, the process of learning, rather than the content), eSchool of Education, University
    [Show full text]
  • NTP-CERHR Expert Panel Report on the Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine
    Published 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.w Birth Defects Research (Part B) 74:471–584 (2005) NTP-CERHR Expert Panel Report on the Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine Mari Golub,1 Lucio Costa,2 Kevin Crofton,3 Deborah Frank,4 Peter Fried,5 Beth Gladen6 Rogene Henderson,7 Erica Liebelt,8 Shari Lusskin,9 Sue Marty,10 Andrew Rowland11 John Scialli12 and Mary Vore13 1California Environment Protection Agency, Sacramento, California 2University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 3U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 4Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 5Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario 6National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 7Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico 8University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama 9New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan 11University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 12Phoenix, Arizona 13University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky PREFACE studies indexed before December 31, 2004. References were also identified from databases such as REPRO- The National Toxicology Program (NTP) and the TOXs, HSDB, IRIS, and DART and from report National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences bibliographies. (NIEHS) established the NTP Center for the Evaluation This evaluation resulted from the efforts of a 13- of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) in June 1998. member panel of government and non-government The purpose of the Center is to provide timely, unbiased, scientists that culminated in a public expert panel scientifically sound evaluations of human and experi- meeting held January 10–12, 2005. This report is a mental evidence for adverse effects on reproduction and product of the Expert Panel and is intended to (1) development caused by agents to which humans may be interpret the strength of scientific evidence that exposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol Use Disorder Relapse Factors a Systematic Review
    Psychiatry Research 278 (2019) 97–115 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Psychiatry Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/psychres Alcohol use disorder relapse factors: A systematic review T ⁎ Wilco Sliedrechta, , Ranne de Waartb, Katie Witkiewitzc, Hendrik G. Roozend a De Hoop GGZ, Provincialeweg 70, 3329 KP Dordrecht, the Netherlands b Mentrum/Arkin, Wisselwerking 46-48, 1112 XR Diemen, the Netherlands c The University of New Mexico (UNM), MSC 03-2220, Univ of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA d The University of New Mexico (UNM), Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (CASAA), MSC 11 6280, 1 Univ of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: A relapsing-remitting course is very common in patients with an Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD). Understanding the Remittance determinants associated with alcohol resumption remains a formidable task. This paper examines relapse de- Recurrence terminants based on a systematic review of recent alcohol literature (2000–2019). Relevant databases were Relapse determinants consulted for articles that contained information about specific relapse determinants and reported statistical Dual diagnosis significance of each relapse determinant in predicting relapse. Relapse was broadly defined based on the Biopsychosocial model characterization in the included articles. From the initial identified 4613 papers, a total of 321 articles were Spiritual included. Results encompass multiple relapse determinants, which were ordered according to biopsychosocial and spiritual categories, and presented, using a descriptive methodology. Psychiatric co-morbidity, AUD se- verity, craving, use of other substances, health and social factors were consistently significantly associated with AUD relapse. Conversely, supportive social network factors, self efficacy, and factors related to purpose and meaning in life, were protective against AUD relapse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Term Effects of Breastfeeding on Development
    3 The Long-Term Effects of Breastfeeding on Development Wendy H. Oddy1, Jianghong Li1,3, Monique Robinson1 and Andrew J.O. Whitehouse1,2 1Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, 2Neurocognitive Development Unit, School of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, 3Centre Population Health Research, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia 1. Introduction The link between breastfeeding duration and subsequent development, cognition, educational, mental, psychomotor and behavioural functioning of the infant has been the subject of much scientific enquiry. Indeed, the effect of feeding on infant health and development was first discussed more than half a century ago when breastfed babies were reported to have better cognitive outcomes in childhood than artificially fed babies (Hoefer and Hardy 1929). Some studies have found striking results pertaining to the relative advantages that breastfeeding can confer on child neurodevelopment (Oddy, Kendall et al. 2003; Vohr, Poindexter et al. 2006; Kramer, Aboud et al. 2008). Breastfeeding has previously been associated with improvements across neurodevelopmental domains for low birthweight babies in comparison with not breastfeeding at all (Vohr, Poindexter et al. 2006). One study reported results from a large randomized controlled trial and found that breastfeeding for a longer duration and exclusive breastfeeding were associated with significant increases in
    [Show full text]