Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency January 2009 Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report What are the essential facts? • Ohio EPA studied the Blanchard River watershed and found water quality problems at all of the locations measured. • The watershed can make progress towards restoration with practical, economical actions. • We invite you to review the work to date. • Improving the streams depends on the participation of the watershed’s residents. What is the significance of this report? The Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report is a tool that will include local ideas from the endorsed watershed action plan to help improve and maintain water quality and habitat in the watershed. What is a watershed? A watershed is the land area from which surface runoff drains into a specific body of water. Where is the Blanchard River streams by examining the number shed (see map). Additional water watershed? and types of fish and aquatic chemistry and bacteria data were insects in the water. An abundance collected in 2005 and 2006 to The Blanchard River water- of fish and insects that tolerate support a computer model that shed is located in portions of Allen, pollution indicates an unhealthy evaluates where the pollution Hancock, Hardin, Putnam and stream, while a large number that comes from and where pollution Wyandot counties in northwest are sensitive to pollution indicates reductions are needed. Ohio. It is a sub-watershed of the a healthy stream. Maumee River Basin that flows The conditions of the water- into the western Lake Erie basin In 2005, Ohio EPA scientists shed were compared with state and drains 771 square miles. collected comprehensive water quality goals to determine biological, chemical and physical which stream segments are An estimated 91,266 citizens data in the Blanchard River water- impaired, and how much needs to live in the Blanchard River water- shed, with the most rapid growth in Hancock County, especially in the suburban Findlay area. Both the City of Findlay and Village of Ottawa pump drinking water from the river. Overall, the land use in the Blanchard River watershed is 81 percent row crop, 10 percent developed urban/residential, 6 percent forest, 3 percent pasture and grasslands and less than 1 percent open water/wetlands. How does Ohio EPA measure water quality? Ohio is one of the few states that measures the health of its Blanchard River at Riverbend Recreation Area, Hancock County (photo courtesy of Tim Powell, 2006) Division of Surface Water, 50 West Town Street, Suite 700, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 644-2001 www.epa.state.oh.us Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report be done to restore good stream habitat and water quality. A report was published in July 2007 that provides detailed information regarding the results of the study, including data from the biological surveys, water and sediment chemistry, habitat conditions and bacteria concentrations in the water. What is the condition of the Blanchard River watershed? Ohio EPA surveyed 116 sites to assess the overall water quality in this 771-square-mile watershed. The Blanchard River itself generally showed good quality, however only about 40 percent of the tributary streams met the water quality goals needed to support healthy aquatic communities. The primary reason for low sunlight from the lack of tree cover. Corps of Engineers during the quality is high algae production Excess algae and high water flood damage risk assessment. caused by excess nutrients temperatures are stressful for running off agricultural fields. Low aquatic wildlife. Eagle Creek (030), which levels of dissolved oxygen and fine includes the City of Findlay, is sediment in the streams have a The Outlet/Lye Creek (020) is impaired by nutrients from direct impact on aquatic impaired by excess nutrients, upstream sources, altered flow at organisms. Habitat and flow habitat and flow alteration and high dams and lack of stream shading. alterations from surface and bacteria. Agricultural fertilizer, These sources contribute to lower subsurface drainage practices are pesticides and failing home dissolved oxygen and high water other reasons for low water quality. sewage systems have overloaded temperature of the Blanchard River There is a human health concern streams with nitrates and in Findlay. The removal of the in most streams because of high phosphorus. Excess nutrients and Liberty Street dam in 2007 fecal coliform bacteria levels herbicides such as atrazine and increased oxygen levels and coming from poorly functioning metolachlor detected in Findlay’s eliminated temperature problems. home septic systems and manure. drinking water are attributed to nonpoint source agricultural runoff. Excessive phosphorus and The following is a summary of Bacteria levels are high down- nitrates have been observed in water quality impairments found in stream of the unsewered village of Eagle Creek and the Blanchard each watershed assessment unit Houcktown. River, especially during high flows. (watershed code provided for Load reductions are needed from each). Three dams in this watershed both agricultural and urban runoff alter the natural flow of the river. during spring and fall. The City of The headwaters area (010) Lack of shade on channelized Findlay and parts of the adjoining had many small streams impacted streams and slow water behind townships are designated for by a combination of agricultural these dams lowers the dissolved Phase 2 storm water permit practices and inadequate waste- oxygen and increases water coverage, and have begun to water treatment from Forest and temperature as the river flows into develop storm water pollution Dunkirk, and from Wharton and Findlay. The Riverside Park dam prevention plans. Patterson, which are unsewered. should be modified to alleviate Overgrowth of algae was caused these problems. This could Ottawa Creek (040) is by elevated nutrients and direct potentially be studied by the Army impaired by habitat and flow 2 Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report alteration and nutrients. Most tributary streams have been What are the three most important “fixes” in the watershed? extensively modified for agri- ♦ Eliminate pervasive bacteria problems cultural drainage. Routine ditch o Reduce home sewage treatment system failures clean-outs and removal of stream o Ensure proper manure handling and management at bank vegetation make it hard for livestock operations pollutants to be treated by natural processes in these small streams. Unrestricted cattle access in ♦ Improve erosion and sediment control in all areas Ottawa Creek contributes to o Establish and protect riparian buffers and filter strips on all bacteria, nutrients and erosion of streams and ditches stream banks. o Use cover crops in non-growing season on farm fields o Practice conservation tillage Riley Creek (050), which o Adopt ditch maintenance that minimizes removal of includes the villages of Bluffton vegetation along the banks and allows for floodplain and Pandora, is impaired by development nutrients, habitat/flow alteration and siltation. Several lowhead ♦ Reduce the amount of nutrients getting into streams dams near Pandora impede the natural flow in Riley Creek, and o Use nutrient management techniques on cropland including cattle access leads to erosion, nitrogen and phosphorus testing indices nutrient and bacteria problems. o Introduce flow control structures in subsurface drainage Lower Little Riley Creek has systems to limit tile flow in non-growing season multiple point source discharges o Create or restore wetlands in low lying areas to store and that degrade water quality and clean polluted runoff contribute to high bacteria. Lack of water in headwater streams, high level of organic material that The TMDL report will provide especially in summer, makes it is expensive to remove from the specific numeric goals for difficult to support good aquatic life raw drinking water supply for improving the stream habitat and communities. Ottawa. The formation of reducing pollutants, including trihalomethanes, a byproduct of pathogens, phosphorus and Cranberry Creek (060) has disinfection for drinking water, is a sediment. Ohio EPA can address poor habitat along most of the human health concern. some of the problems in the tributary streams which have been Additionally, several pesticides Blanchard watershed through extensively modified and put under have been detected in the finished regulatory actions, such as permits county maintenance for agricultural water. for wastewater and storm water drainage. A flood abatement dischargers. Other actions, such project removed the trees and How will water quality get as committing to enhancing and reconstructed the channel from better? protecting riparian areas, proper Rockport to the mouth of fertilizer management and reduced Cranberry Creek in 2005. This The Blanchard River home sewage system failures, will sub-watershed had the highest watershed is included on Ohio’s be up to local residents. level of bacteria impairment and list of impaired waters. Under the high organic loads from Clean Water Act, a cleanup plan is What actions are needed to inadequately treated wastewater. required for each impaired improve water quality? watershed. This cleanup plan, The Blanchard River is known as a total maximum daily Because there are many meeting water quality standards as load (TMDL) report, calculates the reasons why streams in the it flows west from Gilboa to join the maximum amount of pollutants a Blanchard River and its tributaries Auglaize River in Dupont. water body can receive and still fail to meet water quality goals, However, excessive nutrient inputs meet standards (goals). The several actions are required to from each sub-watershed and TMDL report specifies how much improve the current condition and elevated sediment delivery from pollution must be reduced from protect the watershed in the future. Riley and Cranberry creeks various sources and recommends They should focus on reducing threaten to impact the health of the specific actions to achieve this. pollutants loads and/or increasing river mainstem and contribute to a 3 Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report the streams’ capacity to handle the remaining pollutant loads.
Recommended publications
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Blanchard River Putnam, Hancock, Seneca, Allen, Wyandot, and Hardin Counties, OH
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Biological and Water Quality Study of the Blanchard River Putnam, Hancock, Seneca, Allen, Wyandot, and Hardin Counties, OH June 28, 2007 Ted Strickland, Governor Chris Korleski, Director EAS/2007-6-2 2005 Blanchard River Basin TSD June 28, 2007 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Blanchard River and Selected Tributaries 2005 Putnam, Hancock, Seneca, Allen, Wyandot, and Hardin Counties, OH June 28, 2007 OEPA Technical Report EAS/2007-6-2 Prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Columbus OH 43215 Mail to: P.O. Box 1049, Columbus OH 43216-1049 Ted Strickland, Governor, State of Ohio Chris Korleski Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency EAS/2007-6-2 2005 Blanchard River Basin TSD June 28, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE TO USERS ........................................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................iii FOREWORD...................................................................................................................iv MECHANISMS FOR WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENT..................................................ix INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency July 2009 Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report What are the essential facts? Ohio EPA studied the Blanchard River watershed and found water quality problems at all of the locations measured. The watershed can make progress towards restoration with practical, economical actions. Improving the streams depends on the participation of the watershed’s residents. What is the significance of this report? The Blanchard River Watershed TMDL Report is a tool that will include local ideas from the endorsed watershed action plan to help improve and maintain water quality and habitat in the watershed. What is a watershed? A watershed is the land area from which surface runoff drains into a specific body of water. Where is the Blanchard River and types of fish and aquatic collected in 2005 and 2006 to watershed? insects in the water. An abundance support a computer model that of fish and insects that tolerate evaluates where the pollution The Blanchard River water- pollution indicates an unhealthy comes from and where pollution shed is located in portions of Allen, stream, while a large number that reductions are needed. Hancock, Hardin, Putnam and are sensitive to pollution indicates Wyandot counties in northwest a healthy stream. The conditions of the water- Ohio. It is a sub-watershed of the shed were compared with state Maumee River Basin that flows In 2005, Ohio EPA scientists water quality goals to determine into the western Lake Erie basin collected comprehensive which stream segments are and drains 771 square miles. biological, chemical and physical impaired, and how much needs to data in the Blanchard River water- be done to restore good stream An estimated 91,266 citizens shed (see map).
    [Show full text]
  • Western Lake Erie Basin Collaborative Agreement
    State of Ohio’s Western Lake Erie Basin Collaborative Implementation Framework A Pathway for Transitioning Ohio to a Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement Domestic Action Plan February 2017 State of Ohio Western Lake Erie Basin Collaborative Implementation Framework Introduction On June 13, 2015, the governors of Ohio and Michigan, and the premier of Ontario committed to a goal of reducing phosphorus loadings to Lake Erie by 40 percent as specified in the Western Basin of Lake Erie Collaborative Agreement (Collaborative). The Collaborative is intended to advance efforts toward the proposed nutrient reduction targets put forth in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA). This will be done through the development of this Implementation Framework (Framework), ahead of the formal timeline for completing a state Domestic Action Plan (DAP) as set forth in the GLWQA. The Collaborative will focus on the western basin watersheds of the Maumee, Portage and Toussaint rivers and the Sandusky River. The GLWQA through the Domestic Action Plan will include the Central Basin tributaries of the Huron and Cuyahoga rivers, but these will not be addressed in detail in this Framework. Goals of the Collaborative • Achieve a 40 percent total load reduction in the amount of total and dissolved reactive phosphorus entering Lake Erie’s western basin by the year 2025 with an aspirational goal of a 20 percent reduction by 20201. • To use 2008 as the base year from which progress will be measured. • That each state and Province commits to developing, in collaboration with stakeholder groups, a framework outlining actions and timelines toward achieving the goals.
    [Show full text]
  • By Earl E. Webber Water Resources Investigations Report 82-4044
    FLOOD OF JUNE 13-15, 1981, IN THE BLANCHARD RIVER BASIN, NORTHWESTERN OHIO By Earl E. Webber U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Investigations Report 82-4044 Columbus, Ohio 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURJVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief Opeh-File Services Section Water Resources Division Western Distribution Branch U.S. Geological Survey U.S^ Geological Survey 975 West Third Avenue Box 25425, Federal Center Columbus, Ohio 43212 Denver, Colorado 80225 (Telephone: (303) 234-5888) CONTENTS Page Abstract .................................................. 1 Introduction .............................................. 1 Acknowledgments ........................................... 3 Weather conditions preceding flood ........................ 4 Precipitation and runoff during flood ..................... 5 High-water profiles ....................................... 8 Flood-peak discharges ..................................... 8 Conclusions ............................................... 31 References ................................................ 32 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing location of peak discharge measurement sites and isohyetal lines for storm of June 13-15, 1981, in northwestern Ohio ............................ 2 2. Graph showing daily precipitation at the Findlay NOAA weather station and discharge for gage at station 04189000 Blanchard River near Findlay, Ohio, June, 1981
    [Show full text]
  • City of Findlay Riverside Park- Blanchard River HUC-12
    Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategic Plan (NPS-IS plan) Created by: Blanchard River Watershed Partnership PO Box 1237 Findlay, OH. 45839-1237 Phil Martin - Watershed Coordinator This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................iv Chapter 1 Introduction..............................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Report Background.................................................................................................................1-3 1.2 Watershed Profile & History..................................................................................................1-4 1.3 Public Participation and Involvement..................................................................................1-7 Chapter 2 Characterization and Assessment Summary.........................................................2-1 2.1 Summary of Watershed Characterization for the City of Findlay Riverside Park- Blanchard River HUC-12.......................................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Physical and Natural Features.................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Land Use and Protection.........................................................................................2-2 2.2 Summary of Biological Trends for the City of Findlay Riverside Park- Blanchard
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Blanchard River
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Blanchard River Watershed Blanchard River at Riverbend Recreation Area, Hancock County (photo courtesy of Tim Powell, 2006) Final Report May 22, 2009 Ted Strickland, Governor Chris Korleski, Director Blanchard River Watershed TMDLs TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 TMDL overview ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 General introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Public participation ......................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Description of the project area ....................................................................................... 8 2.1 Project delineation .......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Water resources ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Blanchard River-headwaters WAU (HUC 04100008-010) .................................... 11 2.2.2 The Outlet/Lye Creek WAU (HUC 04100008-020) ............................................... 12 2.2.3 Eagle Creek WAU (HUC 04100008-030) .............................................................. 12 2.2.4 Ottawa Creek WAU (HUC 04100008-040) ............................................................ 13 2.2.5 Riley
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology Report 11-8-2017.Docx 1
    Hydrologic Evaluation of the Blanchard River Hancock County Flood Risk Reduction Program Prepared for: Maumee Watershed Conservancy District 1464 Pinehurst Dr. Defiance, Ohio 43512 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 11687 Lebanon Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45069 November 8, 2017 Revision Description Author Quality Check Independent Review 0 FINAL E. Caudill Nov. 8, 2017 SP 11/8 Sign-off Sheet This document entitled Hydrologic Evaluation of the Blanchard River was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Maumee Watershed Conservancy District (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Erman Caudill, PE (KY #23451), CFM Reviewed by (signature) David Hayson, PE Approved by (signature) Scott Peyton, PE HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF THE BLANCHARD RIVER Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Work Program 208 Plan Maintenance and Targeted Water Quality Planning Final Report FFY16 Allotment June 2018
    Water Quality §604(b) Work Program 208 Plan Maintenance and Targeted Water Quality Planning Final Report FFY16 Allotment June 2018 Table of Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Goal ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Methods ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Study Area ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Inventory of Municipal Sanitary Sewers ............................................................................................... 8 Inventory of Package Plants .................................................................................................................. 8 Creation of Sanitary Sewer Maps ......................................................................................................... 8 Populations and Housing Units ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Run-Blanchard River HUC-12 (04100008 03 04)
    Howard Run-Blanchard River Watershed NPS-IS (04100008 03 04) Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategic Plan (NPS-IS plan) Howard Run-Blanchard River HUC-12 (04100008 03 04) Created by: The Blanchard River Watershed Partnership P.O. Box 1237 Findlay, OH 45839-1237 [email protected] Approved: June 4, 2020 Howard Run-Blanchard River Watershed NPS-IS Plan Revision (04100008 03 04) This page intentionally left blank Cover Photo Credit: Blanchard River (Martin) ii Howard Run-Blanchard River Watershed NPS-IS Plan Revision (04100008 03 04) Acknowledgements The Blanchard River Watershed Partnership would like to thank the Ohio EPA and the Ohio Lake Erie Commission for providing the funding for the creation of this NPS-IS Plan. The Partnership would also like to thank the City of Findlay, Hancock County Commissioners, Steve Wilson, Flood Mitigation Project Manager - Maumee Conservancy District, University of Findlay, Findlay City Schools, and the Hancock County Soil and Water Conservation District for input and advice in developing the Best Management Practices outlined in this NPS-IS Plan. Special thanks to Elaine Reynolds for the GIS maps that she created. Finally, thanks to Phil Martin, former watershed coordinator, for writing the plan. This NPS-IS Plan will help to secure funding to address the nonpoint source impairments in the Howard Run-Blanchard River HUC-12 watershed of the Blanchard River Watershed. iii Howard Run-Blanchard River Watershed NPS-IS Plan Revision (04100008 03 04) Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Blanchard River Watershed Model, OH Great Lakes Tributary Model Program (Section 516E, WRDA 96)
    Blanchard River Watershed Model, OH Great Lakes Tributary Model Program (Section 516e, WRDA 96) Project Location: This project is located in the Blanchard River watershed, which is located in the Counties of Allen, Hancock, Hardin, Putnam, Seneca and Wyandot in the State of Ohio. The Blanchard River is a tributary of the Auglaize River, which drains into the Maumee River and eventually into Lake Erie near Toledo, OH. Sediments and non-point pollutants from this watershed discharge to the Toledo Harbor and the Western Lake Erie basin. Project Description: Land use in the 771 square mile Blanchard Watershed is estimated to be 80.8% cultivated crops, 10.1% developed, 5.6% forest, 2.6% pasture and grassland, and < 1% open water and wetlands. This modeling effort will support local stakeholders in identifying sources of sedimentation and excess nutrients throughout the watershed. For this project, the Agricultural Non-Point Source (AGNPS) suite of models were applied to determine sediment sources, contributing locations, and the effect of best management practices (BMPs) on rates of sediment delivery to the mouth of the watershed. Project Benefits: The Blanchard River watershed model will: 1) Simulate erosion, sediment delivery pathways and sediment delivery yields and loads in the watershed; 2) Simulate fate and transport of nutrients throughout the watershed; 3) Project the potential benefits of conservation treatment strategies and best management practices and; 4) Support the larger GLRI effort by reducing erosion in the Maumee Basin and reduce sediment and associated nutrient delivery to Toledo Harbor and Lake Erie. Status: This two-year modeling effort will be completed in September 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • NPS-IS) for Lapp Ditch-Auglaize River HUC-12 (04100007 09 05
    Nine-Element Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for Lapp Ditch-Auglaize River HUC-12 (04100007 09 05) Prepared for: Putnam Soil and Water Conservation District Prepared by: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Toledo, Ohio Version 1.0: May 2020 Approved: May 19, 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. i Putnam Soil & Water Conservation District CEC Project 185-495 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy Acknowledgements Version 1.0 prepared and written by: Jeff Giesige, Jeff Nordhaus, Sarah Rieman, Curtis Tobe Putnam Soil and Water Conservation District 1206 E. Second Street Ottawa, OH 45875 Deanna Bobak Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4841 Monroe Street, Suite 103 Toledo, OH 43623 The Putnam Soil and Water Conservation District would like to acknowledge the collaboration of multiple partners in the preparation of this Nonpoint Source Implementation Strategy (NPS-IS) for the Lapp Ditch-Auglaize River HUC-12. Thank you to the individuals and organizations that contributed background information, insight into objectives and projects for inclusion in this NPS-IS. Special thanks to Rick Wilson, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Division of Surface Water, for guidance throughout the development of this NPS-IS for the Lapp Ditch-Auglaize River HUC-12. Cover photo: the Auglaize River; courtesy of Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. ii Putnam Soil & Water Conservation District CEC Project 185-495 Nonpoint Source-Implementation Strategy
    [Show full text]
  • Using Water Quality Trading to Promote Conservation Measure
    USING WATER QUALITY TRADING TO PROMOTE CONSERVATION MEASURE ADOPTION IN THE BLANCHARD RIVER WATERSHED, OHIO, IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE CHANGE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Yanting Guo, M.Sc. Environmental Science Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Richard Moore Dr. Karen Mancl Dr. Charles Goebel Dr. Eric Toman Copyrighted by Yanting Guo 2018 ABSTRACT Agricultural phosphorus loading has been identified as the main cause of Lake Erie eutrophication and Harmful Algae Blooms since the mid-1990s. Efforts for alleviating the problem have been focused on promoting the adoption of conservation measures, such as the best management practices (BMPs). Water quality trading (WQT), a market-based mechanism that allows one pollution source (e.g. a factory) to meet their regulatory obligations by using pollutant reductions created by another source, such as agriculture, is a method to promote conservation through the lower pollution remediation costs of that source. Agriculture has a vast potential for supplying low cost conservation, however, limited studies have been done on farmers’ opinions about WQT or their selection and adoption of conservation measures in WQT programs. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap. The general objective of this study is to evaluate whether WQT has the potential to serve as an incentive to promote water quality conservation measures in the Western Lake Erie
    [Show full text]