DOCSLIB.ORG

Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Blanchard River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Blanchard River State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Blanchard River Watershed Blanchard River at Riverbend Recreation Area, Hancock County (photo courtesy of Tim Powell, 2006) Final Report May 22, 2009 Ted Strickland, Governor Chris Korleski, Director Blanchard River Watershed TMDLs TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 TMDL overview ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 General introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Public participation ......................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Description of the project area ....................................................................................... 8 2.1 Project delineation .......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Water resources ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Blanchard River-headwaters WAU (HUC 04100008-010) .................................... 11 2.2.2 The Outlet/Lye Creek WAU (HUC 04100008-020) ............................................... 12 2.2.3 Eagle Creek WAU (HUC 04100008-030) .............................................................. 12 2.2.4 Ottawa Creek WAU (HUC 04100008-040) ............................................................ 13 2.2.5 Riley Creek WAU (HUC 04100008-050) ............................................................... 13 2.2.6 Cranberry Creek WAU (HUC 04100008-060) ....................................................... 13 2.2.7 Blanchard River ..................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Land use/ land cover .................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Soils, geology, and topography .................................................................................... 21 2.5 Population and growth trends and economic development .......................................... 23 2.6 Conservation and other efforts to restore and protect water quality ............................. 23 3.0 Applicable water quality standards .............................................................................. 25 3.1 Purpose and underlying authority ................................................................................. 25 3.2 Ohio WQS .................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.1 Definition of water uses ......................................................................................... 25 3.2.2 Quality criteria to protect uses ............................................................................... 25 3.2.3 Antidegradation protections ................................................................................... 26 3.3 Regulatory programs that protect water quality ............................................................ 26 4.0 Watershed assessment results: status of water quality relative to the standards .. 38 4.1 Recreational uses ......................................................................................................... 38 4.1.1 Blanchard River headwaters WAU ........................................................................ 39 4.1.2 The Outlet/Lye Creek WAU ................................................................................... 40 4.1.3 Eagle Creek WAU ................................................................................................. 41 4.1.4 Ottawa Creek WAU ............................................................................................... 42 4.1.5 Riley Creek WAU .................................................................................................. 42 4.1.6 Cranberry Creek WAU .......................................................................................... 43 4.1.7 Blanchard LRAU .................................................................................................... 43 4.2 Aquatic life uses ........................................................................................................... 43 4.2.1 Blanchard River headwaters WAU ........................................................................ 44 4.2.2 The Outlet/Lye Creek WAU ................................................................................... 47 4.2.3 Eagle Creek WAU ................................................................................................. 50 4.2.4 Ottawa Creek WAU ............................................................................................... 54 4.2.5 Riley Creek WAU .................................................................................................. 57 4.2.6 Cranberry Creek WAU .......................................................................................... 59 4.2.7 Blanchard LRAU .................................................................................................... 62 4.3 Source water uses ........................................................................................................ 62 4.3.1 City of Findlay ........................................................................................................ 64 4.3.2 Village of Ottawa ................................................................................................... 66 i Blanchard River Watershed TMDLs 4.4 Fish consumption ......................................................................................................... 67 4.5 Addressing impaired water uses through TMDL development ..................................... 68 5.0 Linkage analyses ........................................................................................................... 69 5.1 How the identified stressors lead to impaired uses ...................................................... 69 5.1.1 Habitat and flow alterations ................................................................................... 69 5.1.2 Sedimentation ....................................................................................................... 70 5.1.3 Nutrient enrichment ............................................................................................... 70 5.1.4 Pathogens ............................................................................................................. 71 5.2 Relationship between stressors and their respective sources ...................................... 72 5.2.1 Point sources ......................................................................................................... 72 5.2.2 Combined sewer overflows ................................................................................... 72 5.2.3 Agriculture (grain and livestock) ............................................................................ 72 5.2.4 Septic systems ...................................................................................................... 73 5.2.5 Storm water ........................................................................................................... 73 5.2.6 Channelization/ riparian removal ........................................................................... 73 5.2.7 Impoundments ....................................................................................................... 74 6.0 Methods of TMDL development .................................................................................... 75 6.1 Selection of water quality target values ........................................................................ 75 6.1.1 Nutrient targets: total phosphorus ......................................................................... 76 6.1.2 Fecal coliform ........................................................................................................ 76 6.1.3 Habitat alteration and sedimentation ..................................................................... 77 6.2 Method for quantifying the existing conditions .............................................................. 80 6.2.1 Nutrients: total phosphorus .................................................................................. 81 6.2.2 Low flow pollutant loading ..................................................................................... 85 6.2.3 Pathogens: fecal coliform ..................................................................................... 91 6.2.4 Habitat and sedimentation ..................................................................................... 95 6.3 Margin of safety, critical conditions and seasonality, and method for making allocations to the sources ................................................................................ 95 6.3.1 Margin of safety ..................................................................................................... 95 6.3.2 Critical conditions and seasonality ........................................................................ 96 6.3.3 Method for calculating reductions and allocating to the sources ........................... 97 7.0 TMDL results ................................................................................................................ 100 7.1 Total phosphorus .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Blanchard River Putnam, Hancock, Seneca, Allen, Wyandot, and Hardin Counties, OH
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Biological and Water Quality Study of the Blanchard River Putnam, Hancock, Seneca, Allen, Wyandot, and Hardin Counties, OH June 28, 2007 Ted Strickland, Governor Chris Korleski, Director EAS/2007-6-2 2005 Blanchard River Basin TSD June 28, 2007 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Blanchard River and Selected Tributaries 2005 Putnam, Hancock, Seneca, Allen, Wyandot, and Hardin Counties, OH June 28, 2007 OEPA Technical Report EAS/2007-6-2 Prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Columbus OH 43215 Mail to: P.O. Box 1049, Columbus OH 43216-1049 Ted Strickland, Governor, State of Ohio Chris Korleski Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency EAS/2007-6-2 2005 Blanchard River Basin TSD June 28, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE TO USERS ........................................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................iii FOREWORD...................................................................................................................iv MECHANISMS FOR WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENT..................................................ix INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Trends in Suspended-Sediment Discharges, Soil Erosion, and Conservation Tillage in the Maumee River Basin–Ohio, Michigan, and Indiana
    In cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Status and Trends in Suspended-Sediment Discharges, Soil Erosion, and Conservation Tillage in the Maumee River Basin–Ohio, Michigan, and Indiana U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Status and Trends in Suspended-Sediment Discharges, Soil Erosion, and Conservation Tillage in the Maumee River Basin—Ohio, Michigan, and Indiana By Donna N. Myers and Kevin D. Metzker, U.S. Geological Survey, and Steven Davis, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4091 In cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of the Interior BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 6480 Doubletree Avenue Columbus, OH 43229-1111 Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S.Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 2000 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • The Fresh-Water Naiades of Auglaize County, Ohio
    THE FRESH-WATER NAIADES OF AUGLAIZE COUNTY, OHIO CLARENCE F. CLARK, Ohio Division of Conservation and Natural Resources, St. Marys, Ohio This paper deals with 30 collections of mussels taken at 24 stations (Fig. 1) in the drainage systems of Auglaize County during the past four years, 1938-42. The materials are of interest because: (1) no other naiad records have been pub- lished for this area; (2) rapid changes in stream ecology necessarily alter the mussel fauna; and (3) the proximity of headwater streams of the Ohio and Lake Erie drainages produce interesting distribution patterns for comparison. In the general vicinity, Goodrich (1914) reported on naiades from the Wabash River in Mercer County; Clark and Wilson (1912) surveyed the Maumee and Auglaize Rivers of Defiance County; Kirsch (1894) investigated the Maumee Basin; Ortmann (1919) reported on mussels from the St. Marys River, Beaver Creek, and Lake St. Marys in Mercer County, the Maumee River in Defiance County, the Scioto River in Hardin County, and Indian Lake in Logan County. These collections have been made in counties to the west, north and east of the region considered at present. Records of Sterki (1907) and those from the Carnegie Museum of Pitts- burgh list specimens from the Great Miami drainage to the south. This paper presents data on the origin of the naiades of Auglaize County, the species involved, their distribution and ecology, together with a brief discussion on the future of naiades in the county. Acknowledgements are due Dr. Henry van der Schalie for assistance in the identification of the specimens used in this study and in the preparation of this paper, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Maumee Watershed Alliance
    Clean Water Indiana 2021 Non-SWCD Led Competitive Grant Application Contact Information Lead Entity Maumee Watershed Alliance Address 425 Van Buren St City, State, ZIP Fort Wayne, IN 46802 Lead Entity Contact Name Sharon Partridge Email Address [email protected] Phone 260-755-8111 Amount Requested $114,500 Authorized Signatory Name Mike Werling Authorized Signatory Email [email protected] Local SWCD Contact Cooperating SWCD Allen County Point of Contact Greg Lake SWCD Phone 260-410-8205 SWCD Email [email protected] Project Information Project Title Advancing Partnerships to Safeguard Soil & Water Resources in the WLEB Project Description Key Project Objectives: 1. Advance efforts to improve water quality and soil health in the upper reaches of the Western Lake Erie Basin. 2. Strengthen local Soil and Water Conservation Districts through partnerships. 3. Increase the efficiency and effectiveness of local watershed organizations. Project Background: Excessive nutrient loading in the Western Lake Erie Basin resulting in toxic algae blooms has been a pervasive issue for many years. While a significant amount of progress has been made through the resources committed to this issue thus far, much more needs to be done. Discussions with local, state and federal officials as well as conservation agencies, NGOs, municipalities and other interested stakeholders have identified the need for further coordination and collaboration to solve this problem. This conclusion is evidenced by a Letter of Support signed by numerous state legislators in support of this application (Attached). The Maumee Watershed Alliance (MWA) has been recognized by watershed organizations, municipalities and SWCDs as the appropriate entity to potentially lead this effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Industrial Pollution on the Aquatic and Shore Angiosperm Flora in the Ottawa River, Allen and Putnam Counties, Ohio1' 2 Ronald L
    226 S. M. TOTTEN, S. R MORAN, AND D. L. GROSS Vol. 69 EFFECT OF INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION ON THE AQUATIC AND SHORE ANGIOSPERM FLORA IN THE OTTAWA RIVER, ALLEN AND PUTNAM COUNTIES, OHIO1' 2 RONALD L. STUCKEY AND W. ALAN WENTZ College of Biological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 ABSTRACT Industrial wastes are continually being emptied into rivers and streams across the country. This paper considers the effect that these wastes have had on the species com- position, distribution, and abundance of individuals of the late summer aquatic and shore angiosperm flora in the industrially polluted Ottawa River downstream from Lima. This flora is compared with the flora in the Ottawa River upstream from Lima and with the flora in the nearby Auglaize River, both of which are not significantly polluted by industrial wastes. The flowering plants in northwestern Ohio rivers mostly belong in two categories: (1) southern species usually restricted to rivers, and (2) widespread species infrequent or common in rivers, but also in other wet habitats. Each species in the former group, being restricted, probably has a narrow ecological tolerance, whereas those in the latter group, being widespread, apparently have a wider ecological amplitude. Water- quality data from several published reports on the pollution of northwestern Ohio rivers reveals the great magnitude of the pollution in the Ottawa River downstream from Lima. A floristic survey of this grossly polluted portion of the river shows that many of the southern, ecologically narrow species, such as Justicia americana, Lippia lanceolata, Phy- stostegia virginiana, Samolus parvifiorus, Saururus cernuus, and Rutnex verticillatus, are rare or absent, whereas many of the more tolerant widespread species are frequent or even abundant.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa River
    OT1 Empties into: North Maumee Bay OT1 Mouth: Erie Township, MI Length: 20 miles (19 miles in Ohio) Elevation at source: 738 feet above sea level (includes Ten Mile Creek) Elevation at mouth: 573 feet above sea level Average fall: 4 feet per mile 8-digit HUC: 04100001 8-digit HUC name: Ottawa-Stony Number of Access Sites: 8 Ottawa River The Ottawa River is a short tributary that empties into the North Maumee Bay (Lake Erie) less than one mile north of the Ohio-Michigan state line and only 2.3 miles north of the Maumee River mouth. With the exception of the mouth and the river’s first three-quarters of a mile, the 20-mile Ottawa River flows within Lucas County. The river begins at the confluence of the Ten Mile and North Ten Mile creeks in Sylvania. The North Ten Mile Creek is a 4-mile tributary that originates in Michigan. The 27-mile long Ten Mile Creek flows entirely within Ohio, although it meanders within 160 feet of the state line. The Ottawa River Watershed is 220.9 square miles and drains portions of Fulton and Lucas counties in Ohio and portions of Lenawee and Monroe counties in Michigan. The Ottawa River is named after the Ottawa Indians, a Native American tribe that once inhabited the area. ‘Ottawa’ is an anglicized spelling of the word ‘adawe,’ which means “trader” or “to trade.” The river also shares its name with another western Lake Erie Watershed tributary. The other Ottawa River is a 50-mile tributary that rises in Hardin County, flows through Allen and Putnam counties and empties into the Auglaize River, which then flows into the Maumee River.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Lake Erie Basin Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring
    Western Lake Erie Basin Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring OKI monitoring and findings Donna Runkle and Ed Dobrowolski April 23, 2019 Problem Large inputs of nitrogen and phosphorus can cause algal blooms and can cause taste and odor problems and introduce cyanotoxins into water supplies. Objective Measure streamflow and collect water- quality samples to quantify daily, seasonal, and annual nutrient and sediment loads from tributaries of the Maumee River that flow into Lake Erie. 2 Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring Sites in the Western Lake Erie Basin Map label Station ID Station Name 1 04185935 Auglaize River near Kossuth, OH 2 04186500 Auglaize River near Fort Jennings , OH 3 04188100 Ottawa River near Kalida, OH 4 04190000 Blanchard River near Dupont, OH 5 04191058 Little Auglaize River near Melrose, OH 6 41914444 Little Flatrock Creek near Junction, OH 7 04191500 Auglaize River near Defiance, OH 8 04192500 Maumee River near Defiance, OH 9 04185318 Tiffin River near Evansport, OH 10 04183979 Platter Creek near Sherwood, OH 11 04178000 St Joseph River near Newville, IN 12 04183500 Maumee River at Antwerp, OH---Supergage 13 04183105 Maumee River at SR 101 near Woodburn, IN 14 04183000 Maumee River at New Haven, IN 15 04182000 St Marys River near Fort Wayne, IN 16 04181049 St Marys River at Walcot Street at Willshire, OH 3 Project Partners 4 Water-Quality Parameters Analyzed for Projects Parameter Parameter name/description code (National Water Quality Lab (NWQL) Schedule2425 Total Dissolved Nutrients 00671 (DRP, dissolved reactive
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Shore Beetle Communities of Some Channelized Streams in Northwest Ohio (Coleoptera)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 11 Number 1 - Spring 1978 Number 1 - Spring 1978 Article 3 April 1978 An Analysis of the Shore Beetle Communities of Some Channelized Streams in Northwest Ohio (Coleoptera) Paul M. Holeski Bowling Green State University Robert C. Graves Bowling Green State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Holeski, Paul M. and Graves, Robert C. 1978. "An Analysis of the Shore Beetle Communities of Some Channelized Streams in Northwest Ohio (Coleoptera)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 11 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol11/iss1/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Holeski and Graves: An Analysis of the Shore Beetle Communities of Some Channelized S THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST AN ANALYSIS OF 'THE SHORE BEETLE COMMUNlTlES OF SOME CHANNELIZED STREAMS IN NORTHWEST OHIO COLE OPT ERA)^ Paul M. Holeski and Robert C. craves2 ABSTRACT The present shore beetle communities of some northwest Ohio streams channelized between 1937 and 1973 were studied. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were made to determine the effects of channelization on the community and the results are discussed. Ninety species, chiefly Carabidae, Heteroceridae and Staphylinidae, were collected; at least 20 not previously reported from Ohio. In addition, some species associations are noted. Stream margins form very narrow and often unstable ecological situations which are inhabited by a diverse but specific collection of insect species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Pollution Potential of Auglaize County, Ohio
    GROUND WATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL OF AUGLAIZE COUNTY, OHIO BY MICHAEL P. ANGLE AND KELLY BARRETT GROUND WATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL REPORT NO. 66 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER WATER RESOURCES SECTION 2005 ABSTRACT A ground water pollution potential map of Auglaize County has been prepared using the DRASTIC mapping process. The DRASTIC system consists of two major elements: the designation of mappable units, termed hydrogeologic settings, and the superposition of a relative rating system for pollution potential. Hydrogeologic settings incorporate hydrogeologic factors that control ground water movement and occurrence including depth to water, net recharge, aquifer media, soil media, topography, impact of the vadose zone media, and hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. These factors, which form the acronym DRASTIC, are incorporated into a relative ranking scheme that uses a combination of weights and ratings to produce a numerical value called the ground water pollution potential index. Hydrogeologic settings are combined with the pollution potential indexes to create units that can be graphically displayed on a map. Ground water pollution potential analysis in Auglaize County resulted in a map with symbols and colors, which illustrate areas of varying ground water pollution potential indexes ranging from 87 to 172. Auglaize County lies entirely within the Glaciated Central hydrogeologic setting. Limestones and dolomites of the Silurian System compose the aquifer for most of the county. Yields in the uppermost carbonate aquifers range from 5 to 100 gallons per minute (gpm) for much of the county to over 100 gpm in the northeastern, southwestern, and south central portions of the county. Yields over 100 gpm are possible from larger diameter wells drilled deeper into the limestone for almost the entire county.
    [Show full text]
  • The Auglaize River Bank Stabilization Project • How-To Get Involved You Can Help • Backyard Conservation: Save Lake Erie Rain Barrels & Rain Gardens
    Land ToLake magazine premier issue | autumn 2014 The Auglaize River Bank Stabilization Project • How-to Get Involved You Can Help • Backyard Conservation: Save Lake Erie Rain Barrels & Rain Gardens your local source for cleaner water | landtolake.com You Can Help Land ToLake Q&A m a g a z i n e Save Lake Erie What is Land to Lake? and economically important areas Who is Land to Lake? Stephanie Singer The health of Lake Erie and Actions here on the land do have an Jennifer English 2 “Land to Lake” is an Initiative of the Great Lakes system. Land to Lake is a joint-venture of especially the Western Lake Erie impact on the water resources of 3 Editors designed to get our community The full potential of the resource, the City of Defiance’s MS4 Division Basin is suffering badly due to Lake Erie. We believe that Yvonne Dale involved in protecting the water however, is compromised by long and the Defiance Soil and Water Creative Director Harmful Algal Blooms (HAB’s). everyone can do something to resources of the Maumee River standing issues associated with Conservation District(SWCD). Printing by There is a regional effort to make a positive difference! Watershed throughout Defiance point and nonpoint source pollution Homewood Press, Toledo Ohio improve the water quality in Lake County. including phosphorus loads, Erie that includes business, & Plant A Rain Garden* excessive algae growth, oxygen industry, agricultural, municipal, & Install A Rain Barrel* What’s the Geographic depletion, sedimentation and and federal leaders as well as & Plant A Tree Area of Concern? dredging requirements, aquatic community partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow and Water-Quality Characteristics of the Ottawa River and Selected Tributaries in Alien, Hardin, and Putnam Counties, Ohio
    science for a changing world Prepared in cooperation with the Ottawa River Coalition Streamflow and Water-Quality Characteristics of the Ottawa River and Selected Tributaries in Alien, Hardin, and Putnam Counties, Ohio Open-File Report 03-215 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo: Little Ottawa River near Lima, a tributary to the Ottawa River, was one of the sites where streamflow and water-quality measurements were made. (Photo by Kimberly H. Shatter.) U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Streamflow and Water-Quality Characteristics of the Ottawa River and Selected Tributaries in Alien, Hardin, and Putnam Counties, Ohio By Kimberly Shatter Open-File Report 03-215 Prepared in cooperation with the Ottawa River Coalition U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 6480 Doubletree Avenue Columbus, OH 43229-1111 Copies of this report can be purchased from: USGS Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Columbus, Ohio 2003 CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................^
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Watershed?
    WHAT IS A WATERSHED? A watershed is any area of land where surface water drains into a common body of water. If water from a neighborhood drains into a particular ditch, then that neighborhood shares a common water- shed. Where ditches from several neigh- borhoods drain into a creek or brook, then all of those neighborhoods share a common watershed. Likewise, a water- shed would include the geographical area of all creeks and brooks that drain into a river. In our area of northwest Ohio, you might live within a watershed that is drained by Reference provided by: http://www.depweb.state.pa.us/ Eagle creek or Riley creek or any num- justforkids ber of other creeks. As those creeks empty into the Blanchard River, then you can say that you also live in the Blanchard River Watershed. On a larger scale, you can claim that you live in the Maumee River watershed as the Blanchard flows into the Auglaize River, which then flows into the Maumee. Of course, the Maumee River flows into Lake Erie, which means that you are a part of the Great Lakes Watershed, too! Interestingly, just a few hundred yards south of the headwaters of the Blanchard River in Kenton, Ohio, water flows to the Scioto River, which flows to the Ohio River and on to the Mississippi River and the Gulf of Mexico. Ironically, folks who live in the north end of Kenton have something in common with folks in Montreal, Canada, where water from the Great Lakes flows past on its way to the Gulf of St.
    [Show full text]