Endangered and Threatened Animals of Texas Endangered and Threatened Animals of Texas Their Life History and Management by Linda Campbell

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Endangered and Threatened Animals of Texas Endangered and Threatened Animals of Texas Their Life History and Management by Linda Campbell Endangered and Threatened Animals of Texas Endangered and Threatened Animals of Texas Their Life History and Management by Linda Campbell Wildlife Division 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 Revised and approved by USFWS 2003 Endangered and Threatened Animals of Texas Their Life History and Management Species Accounts Mammals Mexican Long-nosed Bat (Leptonycteris nivalis) . 1-3 Black-footed Ferret (Mustela nigripes) . 1-3 Management Guidelines for the Black-footed Ferret . 1-2 Jaguarundi (Felis yagouaroundi cacomitli) . 1-2 Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) . 1-3 Mangagement Guidelines for the Jaguarundi and Ocelot . 1 Louisiana Black Bear (Ursus americanus luteolus) . 1-3 Birds Golden-cheeked Warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia) . 1-4 Management Guidelines for the Golden-cheeked Warbler in Rural Landscapes . 1-5 Black-capped Vireo (Vireo atricapillus) . 1-4 Management Guidelines for Black-capped Vireo . 1-4 Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) . 1-6 Management Guidelines for Red-cockaded Woodpecker . 1 Attwater’s Prairie Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido) . 1-3 Management Guidelines for Attwater’s Prairie Chicken . 1-2 Whooping Crane (Grus americana) . 1-6 Eastern Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis occidentalis) . 1-3 Eskimo Curlew (Numenius borealis) . 1-3 Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) . 1-4 Interior Least Tern (Sterna antillarum athalassos) . 1-4 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) . 1-4 Habitat Management Guidelines for Bald Eagles in Texas . 1-2 Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) . 1-4 Northern Aplomado Falcon (Falco femoralis septentrionalis) . 1-5 Mexican Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) . 1-2 Reptiles Kemp’s Ridley Sea Turtle (Lepidochelys kempii) . 1-4 Concho Water Snake (Nerodia paucimaculata) . 1-4 Amphibians and Fish Edwards Aquifer Species: . 1-6 San Marcos Salamander (Eurycea nana) Texas Blind Salamander (Typhlomolge rathbuni) San Marcos Gambusia (Gambusia georgei) Fountain Darter (Etheostoma fonticola) Peck’s Cave Amphipod (Stygobromus pecki) Comal Springs Riffle Beetle (Heterelmis comalensis) Comal Springs Dryopid Beetle (Stygoparnus comalensis) Management Guidelines for Endangered and Threatened Species of the Edwards Aquifer . 1-2 Barton Springs Salamander (Eurycea sosorum) . 1-2 Houston Toad (Bufo houstonensis) . 1-3 Management Guidelines for the Houston Toad . 1-2 Clear Creek Gambusia (Gambusia heterochir) . 1-2 Desert Spring Fishes: . 1-5 Comanche Springs Pupfish (Cyprinodon elegans) Leon Springs Pupfish (Cyprinodon bovinus) Pecos Gambusia (Gambusia nobilis) Big Bend Gambusia (Gambusia gaigei) Invertebrates Karst Invertebrates: . 1-3 Bee Creek Cave Harvestman (Texella reddelli) Bone Cave Harvestman (Texella reyesi) Tooth Cave Pseudoscorpion (Tartarocreagris texana) Tooth Cave Spider (Neoleptoneta myopica) Tooth Cave Ground Beetle (Rhadine persephone) Kretschmarr Cave Mold Beetle (Texamaurops reddelli) Coffin Cave Mold Beetle (Batrisodes texanus) Management Guidelines for Karst Invertebrates . 1-2 Appendix 1: The Endangered Species Process . .125-126 Appendix 2: State Listed Endangered and Threatened Species . .127-129 Mexican Long-nosed Bat Scientific Name: Leptonycteris nivalis Federal Status: Endangered, 9/30/88 • State Status: Endangered Description creosotebush-cactus (1800-3500 ft.), The feeding ecology of the The Mexican Long-nosed Bat is a deciduous woodland (3700-7800 ft.), Mexican Long-nosed Bat is of great relatively large bat compared with pinyon-juniper-oak woodland (3700- importance in understanding its life most U.S. bat species. It measures 7800 ft.), and cypress-pine-oak history and recent decline. These about 2.75 to 3.75 inches in total (5800-7200 ft.). bats are nectar feeders, emerging at length, can be dark gray to “sooty” For day roosting sites, Mexican night to feed on the showy flowers of brown in color, and has a long Long-nosed Bats depend on cool plants such as agave or century muzzle with a prominent nose leaf at caves, crevices, abandoned mines, plants (Agave spp.). They are very the tip. Its long tongue, an adapta- tunnels, and old buildings. These strong, highly maneuverable fliers, tion for feeding on flower nectar, highly colonial bats are frequently and like hummingbirds, are able to can be extended up to 3 inches and found near the entrances of caves hover in flight while they feed. A has hair-like papillae on its tip. It and other roosts, in the twilight mutual relationship exists, with the has a minute tail that may appear to zones. The bats often occupy the bats depending on the plants for be lacking. same roosts from year to year. food, and the plants benefiting from Throughout their range, thousands of the bats as pollinators. individuals may roost together at a Agaves flower by sending up a single site, although the number of green stalk supporting numerous caves with large aggregations is less flower clusters that produce large common today than in the past. quantities of nectar each night. In addition to consuming the nectar, the Life History bats also ingest pollen, picked up Although movement patterns are not inadvertently on their fur as they well known, Mexican Long-nosed Bats feed and later ingested during groom- are thought to move from central ing. The pollen provides vitamins Mexico into northern Mexico each year, with part of the population crossing the border into Texas and New Mexico. The colony of bats at Big Bend occupies their northern roosts from June through August, after which they move south to winter in central Mexico. Mexican Long-nosed Bat The young are © Merlin D. Tuttle born in Mexico during April, May and early June, Distribution then move northward with and Habitat their mothers. Females are The Mexican Long-nosed Bat has been believed to give birth to one or found in southwestern New Mexico, perhaps two young each year. the Big Bend area of Texas, the Although not documented for the Chinati Mountains of Presidio Mexican Long-nosed Bat, mothers of County, Texas and southward to other bat species recognize their own central Mexico. The species was first young by a combination of smell and discovered in the United States in distress cries made by their offspring. 1937 in a cave in the Chisos Moun- Young bats nurse for about one and minerals and is rich in protein. tains of Big Bend National Park. In month and are generally capable of Agave nectar is at least 17-22% sugar Texas and northern Mexico, at the flying by five weeks of age. Few and the pollen is about 50% protein. northern part of their range, these adult males have been recorded in The Mexican Long-nosed Bat and a bats are found in desert scrub vegeta- Texas and northern Mexico suggest- similar species, the Lesser Long-nosed tion dotted with century plants ing that males and females may segre- Bat (Leptonycteris curasoae), are the (agaves), mesquite, creosotebush, and gate geographically, with males rarely main pollinators of several agave a variety of cacti. In Big Bend appearing in the most northerly part species, including Agave angustifolia National Park, long-nosed bats are of the species’ range. From late Octo- (mezcal plant), A. salmiana (pulque associated with five distinct vegeta- ber to December, adult males and plant), and A. tequilana (tequila tion types at various elevations. females congregate in a cave near plant). The Mexican Long-nosed Bat These include the arroyo-mesquite- Cuernavaca, Morelos (central Mexico) acacia (1800-4000 ft.), lechuguilla- to copulate. Mexican Long-nosed Bat 1 prefers higher and cooler places in ulation of 10,000 Mexican Long-nosed Agave plants are harvested just parts of New Mexico, Texas, and Bats in 1938, had no sign of the before they bloom by removing the Mexico; whereas, the Lesser Long- species in 1983. Another mine in “cabeza” or carbohydrate-rich meris- nosed Bat generally inhabits lower Nuevo Leon had a ceiling covered tem (actively growing tissue) and leaf elevations in New Mexico, Arizona, with newborn bats in 1967, but only base at the center of the plants. When Mexico, and parts of Central and one bat was found in 1983. Consid- agaves are harvested, not only are South America. In some areas, the ering this information, the U.S. Fish they removed from the bats’ present two species are found together. and Wildlife Service added this bat, food supply, but future generations of Mexican Long-nosed Bats, with along with its close relative the Lesser agave plants also are eliminated. This their long muzzles and tongues, are Long-nosed Bat, to the list of endan- is especially critical, since a single well adapted to feeding on nectar and gered species in 1988. plant grows for 10 to 20 years and protein-rich pollen. Adapted for spe- The reasons for these population cialized feeding, they migrate to follow declines are not entirely understood, the bloom periods of a number of but are thought to be associated with agave and cacti species. In Big Bend loss of roosting sites and food National Park, agaves begin blooming sources. Food resources are lost by in mid-May at lower elevations and both land use change and wild agave early June at higher altitudes. The bats harvesting. Colonial roosting species, arrive in Texas about one month after such as many bats, are particularly flowering of agaves has begun. After vulnerable to disturbance and spending most of the summer in Big destruction of roosting habitat, since Bend, they leave the United States in this can result in the displacement of late summer or early fall as the agaves large numbers of animals at one time. go out of bloom. They follow later- Just a few roost sites are known for blooming agaves southward through this species that provide the proper Mexico. By November, they are several roosting environment including tem- hundred miles into Mexico, where they perature and humidity. While the feed on the blooms of subtropical trees roost site in the United States is pro- and cacti. They spend the winter in tected within Big Bend National Park, the lush Central Valley of Mexico, feed- the bats spend most of the year in ing on a large variety of flowers.
Recommended publications
  • Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Headstart 08/1994 Program (NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-OPR-3) TED Regulations for Shrimp Trawls 57 FR 57348 12/04/1992 Recovery Plan - U.S
    Fishing Permits Habitat Conservation Grants Fisheries Environmental Analyses Endangered Spec Search Go fish! nmlkji This si nmlkj All of NMFS Home Threatened and Endangered Species Divisions/Branches Lists What We Do Fishery Bulletins The following list of species under NMFS Fishery Quotas jurisdiction, listed as threatened or endangered, Fishery Regulations for each state and territory. Click on the state, News/Media territory or areas below to view a list of Species: National Employee 1. Southeast Region (North Carolina to Texas and Locator the Caribbean) FOIA Information 2. South Atlantic (North Carolina to Key West Public Records Florida) Request 3. Gulf of Mexico 4. Alabama 5. Florida - Atlantic Coast 6. Florida - Gulf Coast 7. Georgia 8. Louisiana 9. Mississippi 10. North Carolina 11. Puerto Rico 12. South Carolina 13. Texas 14. U.S. Virgin Islands Home · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer · About Us · Information Quality · Contact Us · Last Updated: February 2, 2010 NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources OPR Home | About OPR | Species | Permits | Laws & Policies | Programs | Education | Publications Loggerhead Turtle (Caretta caretta) Species Marine Mammals Status | Taxonomy | Species Description | Habitat | Distribution | Cetaceans Population Trends | Threats | Conservation Efforts | Regulatory Overview | Pinnipeds Key Documents | More Info Marine Turtles Marine & Anadromous Fish Status Marine Invertebrates & ESA Threatened - throughout its range Plants Species of Concern Taxonomy Threatened & Endangered Kingdom: Animalia Species Phylum: Chordata Critical Habitat Maps Class: Reptilia Order: Testudines Loggerhead turtle hatchling (Caretta caretta) Family: Cheloniidae Contact OPR Photo: Mary Wozny, Broward Glossary Genus: Caretta County Florida Sea Turtle OPR Site Map Species: caretta Conservation Program Species Description Did You Know? Loggerheads were named for their relatively large heads, which support powerful jaws and enable them to feed on Search OPR hard-shelled prey, such as whelks and conch.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-Year Work Plan by District for Fys 2015-2018
    4 Year Work Plan by District for FYs 2015 - 2018 Overview Section §201.998 of the Transportation code requires that a Department Work Program report be provided to the Legislature. Under this law, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) provides the following information within this report. Consistently-formatted work program for each of TxDOT's 25 districts based on Unified Transportation Program. Covers four-year period and contains all projects that the district proposes to implement during that period. Includes progress report on major transportation projects and other district projects. Per 43 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 16 Subchapter C rule §16.106, a major transportation project is the planning, engineering, right of way acquisition, expansion, improvement, addition, or contract maintenance, other than the routine or contracted routine maintenance, of a bridge, highway, toll road, or toll road system on the state highway system that fulfills or satisfies a particular need, concern, or strategy of the department in meeting the transportation goals established under §16.105 of this subchapter (relating to Unified Transportation Program (UTP)). A project may be designated by the department as a major transportation project if it meets one or more of the criteria specified below: 1) The project has a total estimated cost of $500 million or more. All costs associated with the project from the environmental phase through final construction, including adequate contingencies and reserves for all cost elements, will be included in computing the total estimated cost regardless of the source of funding. The costs will be expressed in year of expenditure dollars. 2) There is a high level of public or legislative interest in the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas
    Volume 2011 Article 11 2011 Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas Timothy K. Perttula Heritage Research Center, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Bo Nelson Heritage Research Center, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Jon C. Lohse [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Perttula, Timothy K.; Nelson, Bo; and Lohse, Jon C. (2011) "Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2011, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2011.1.11 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2011/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2011/iss1/11 Archeological Survey Investigations at Martin Creek Lake State Park, Rusk County, Texas by Timothy K.
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Creek Gambusia Scientific Name: Gambusia Heterochir Federal Status: Endangered, 3/11/67 • State Status: Endangered
    Clear Creek Gambusia Scientific Name: Gambusia heterochir Federal Status: Endangered, 3/11/67 • State Status: Endangered Description greater temperature fluctuations. tolerant of variable water tempera- The Clear Creek gambusia is a small, This habitat is less suitable for the tures. These eurythermal (wide tem- stocky fish, about 1.2 to 1.3 inches in spring-dwelling Clear Creek gambu- perature tolerance) organisms soon length, with a metallic sheen. Scat- sia, and more suitable for the western overwhelmed the springrun animals tered dark markings on some scales mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis), a that were not isolated upstream from form distinctive crescent-shaped pat- major competitor. the first dam (Dam 1). terns. Unlike some other Gambusia Since the only habitat for the species, this fish has no speckling on Life History Clear Creek gambusia exists upstream the tail or yellow pigment on the dor- The Clear Creek gambusia is vivipa- from Dam 1, this dam is vital for pro- sal or anal fins. Females have a pro- rous (bears living young). Once fer- tecting an environment isolated from nounced anal spot, especially when tilized, females can store sperm for invasion by the western mosquitofish. pregnant, and males have a deep several months, and they may pro- In 1979, Dam 1 was in serious disre- notch at the top of the pectoral fin. duce several broods of young from pair due to age, the effects of tunnel- Like other live-bearers, the male’s March through September. Factors ing by nutria (a large introduced anal fin is modified into a tube-like such as day length, temperature, and rodent), and the expansion of root structure called a gonopodium for food availability have been shown to systems of trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Melanoides Tuberculata), Species Habitat Associations and Life History Investigations in the San Solomon Spring Complex, Texas
    FINAL REPORT As Required by THE ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM TEXAS Grant No. TX E-121-R Endangered and Threatened Species Conservation Native springsnails and the invasive red-rim melania snail (Melanoides tuberculata), species habitat associations and life history investigations in the San Solomon Spring complex, Texas Prepared by: David Rogowski Carter Smith Executive Director Clayton Wolf Director, Wildlife 3 October 2012 FINAL REPORT STATE: ____Texas_______________ GRANT NUMBER: ___ TX E-121-R___ GRANT TITLE: Native springsnails and the invasive red-rim melania snail (Melanoides tuberculata), species habitat associations and life history investigations in the San Solomon Spring complex, Texas. REPORTING PERIOD: ____17 Sep 09 to 31 May 12_ OBJECTIVE(S): To determine patterns of abundance, distribution, and habitat use of the Phantom Cave snail (Cochliopa texana), Phantom Spring tryonia (Tryonia cheatumi), and the invasive red-rim melania snail (Melanoides tuberculta) in San Solomon Springs, and potential interactions. Segment Objectives: Task 1. January - February 2010. A reconnaissance visit(s) will be made to the region to investigate the study area and work on specific sampling procedural methods. Visit with TPWD at the Balmorhea State Park, as well as meet The Nature Conservancy personnel at Diamond Y and Sandia springs complexes. Task 2. March 2010– August 2011. Begin sampling. Field sampling will be conducted every 6-8 weeks, over a period of a year and a half. Sampling methods are outlined below stated Tasks. Task 3. December 2010. Completion of first year of study. With four seasonal samples completed, preliminary data analysis and statistical modeling will begin. Preliminary results will be presented at the Texas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • A REVISION of the GAMBUSIA NICARAGUENSIS SPECIES GROUP (PISCES:POECILIIDAE) by William L. Fink ABSTRACT in Addition to Gambusia
    Reprinted from PUBLICATIONS OF THE GULF COAST RESEARCH LABORATORY MUSEUM 2:47-77, June 18, 1971 A REVISION OF THE GAMBUSIA NICARAGUENSIS SPECIES GROUP (PISCES:POECILIIDAE) by William L. Fink ABSTRACT In addition to Gambusia nicaraguensis, the species group includes G. wrayi, G. mela pleura and G. his paniolae sp. nov. G. gracilior is a junior synonym of G. wrayi and G. dominicensis is found to be a member of another species group. A key and zoogeographical notes are provided for the group. Rivas (1963) published on subgenera and species groups in the genus Gambusia. He used only gonopodial characters in defining his groups, and I believe that his system is both natural and practical. Subsequent investigation has shown a need to review his findings and to make adjust- ments in the system. I have found that G. dominicensis is a member of another species group and that the species referred to as dominicensis by Rivas (1963) is actually undescribed. Otherwise, I accept his G. nicara- guensis species group and feel that its revision will help clarify other prob- lems within the genus. METHODS.—Methods are those of Fink (1971). Abbreviations are as follows: ANSP - Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia; BMNH - British Museum (Natural History); GCRL - Gulf Coast Re- search Laboratory; UMMZ - University of Michigan Museum of Zoology; USNM - United States National Museum. Unless otherwise noted, lengths are standard length (SL); descriptions of coloration are from alcoholic specimens; all material examined is not included in the tables. 47 DIAGNOSIS OF THE SPECIES GROUP.—Length of gonopodium about one-third of SL.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
    Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up­ wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ANDERSON 396 - XXX D PALESTINE PICNIC AND CAMPING PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $136,086.77 C 8/23/1976 3/1/1979 2 719 - XXX D COMMUNITY FOREST PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $275,500.00 C 8/23/1979 8/31/1985 2 ANDERSON County Total: $411,586.77 County Count: 2 ANDREWS 931 - XXX D ANDREWS MUNICIPAL POOL CITY OF ANDREWS $237,711.00 C 12/6/1984 12/1/1989 19 ANDREWS County Total: $237,711.00 County Count: 1 ANGELINA 19 - XXX C DIBOLL CITY PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $174,500.00 C 10/7/1967 10/1/1971 2 215 - XXX A COUSINS LAND PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $113,406.73 C 8/4/1972 6/1/1973 2 297 - XXX D LUFKIN PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $49,945.00 C 11/29/1973 1/1/1977 2 512 - XXX D MORRIS FRANK PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $236,249.00 C 5/20/1977 1/1/1980 2 669 - XXX D OLD ORCHARD PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $235,066.00 C 12/5/1978 12/15/1983 2 770 - XXX D LUFKIN TENNIS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $51,211.42 C 6/30/1980 6/1/1985 2 879 - XXX D HUNTINGTON CITY PARK CITY OF HUNTINGTON $35,313.56 C 9/26/1983 9/1/1988 2 ANGELINA County Total: $895,691.71 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue PDF Volume 40, Issue 11
    Fisheries ISSN: 0363-2415 (Print) 1548-8446 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ufsh20 Full Issue PDF Volume 40, Issue 11 To cite this article: (2015) Full Issue PDF Volume 40, Issue 11, Fisheries, 40:11, 525-572, DOI: 10.1080/03632415.2015.1115707 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2015.1115707 Published online: 05 Nov 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 147 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ufsh20 Download by: [Department Of Fisheries] Date: 13 March 2016, At: 23:47 FisheriesVol. 40 • No. 11 • November 2015 Downloaded by [Department Of Fisheries] at 23:47 13 March 2016 How to Thrive in Grad School Are Hermaphroditic Fish More Vulnerable to Fishing? Introduced Populations Help Preclude ESA Listing “I was amazed at how eective these gloves were and how easy they made handling of large-sized fishes.” – Alan Temple* “We were some of the first people to field-test [the gloves]. We used them last spring in our hatcheries to spawn muskies and walleye, and in the field to implant transmitters in muskies, walleyes and trout for telemetry studies. They worked great. We were really impressed.” – Je Hansbarger** · Portable, waterproof, and lightweight · Measuring and tagging made simple · Chemical free handling · Fish can be lawfully released immediately Downloaded by [Department Of Fisheries] at 23:47 13 March 2016 · Rubber gloves Safely immobilize live fish with Smith-Root’s new insulate user FISH HANDLING GLOVE SYSTEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution of Deep Angiosperm Phylogeny Using Conserved Nuclear Genes and Estimates of Early Divergence Times
    ARTICLE Received 24 Mar 2014 | Accepted 11 Aug 2014 | Published 24 Sep 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5956 OPEN Resolution of deep angiosperm phylogeny using conserved nuclear genes and estimates of early divergence times Liping Zeng1, Qiang Zhang2, Renran Sun1, Hongzhi Kong3, Ning Zhang1,4 & Hong Ma1,5 Angiosperms are the most successful plants and support human livelihood and ecosystems. Angiosperm phylogeny is the foundation of studies of gene function and phenotypic evolution, divergence time estimation and biogeography. The relationship of the five divergent groups of the Mesangiospermae (B99.95% of extant angiosperms) remains uncertain, with multiple hypotheses reported in the literature. Here transcriptome data sets are obtained from 26 species lacking sequenced genomes, representing each of the five groups: eudicots, monocots, magnoliids, Chloranthaceae and Ceratophyllaceae. Phylogenetic analyses using 59 carefully selected low-copy nuclear genes resulted in highly supported relationships: sisterhood of eudicots and a clade containing Chloranthaceae and Ceratophyllaceae, with magnoliids being the next sister group, followed by monocots. Our topology allows a re-examination of the evolutionary patterns of 110 morphological characters. The molecular clock estimates of Mesangiospermae diversification during the late to middle Jurassic correspond well to the origins of some insects, which may have been a factor facilitating early angiosperm radiation. 1 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, Ministry of Education Key Laboratoryof Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Plant Biology, Institute of Biodiversity Science, Center for Evolutionary Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 220 Handan Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China. 2 Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Mosquitofish Gambusia Affinis ILLINOIS RANGE
    western mosquitofish Gambusia affinis Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The western mosquitofish male grows to about one Class: Osteichthyes inch in length, while the female attains a length of Order: Cyprinodontiformes about two inches. A dark, teardrop-shaped mark is present under each eye. Black spots can be seen on Family: Poeciliidae the dorsal and tail fins. The back is gray-green to ILLINOIS STATUS brown-yellow with a dark stripe from the head to the dorsal fin. The sides are silver or gray with a common, native yellow or blue sheen. Scales are present on the head, and scales on the body have dark edges, giving a cross-hatched effect. These fish tend to die in the summer that they become mature. BEHAVIORS The western mosquitofish may be found in the southern one-half of Illinois. This fish lives in areas of little current and plentiful vegetation in swamps, sloughs, backwaters, ponds, lakes and streams. The western mosquitofish reproduces three or four times during the summer. Fertilization is internal. After mating, sperm is stored in a pouch within the female and may be used to fertilize several broods. The eggs develop inside the female and hatch in three to four weeks. Young are born alive. A brood may contain very few or several hundred fish. Young develop rapidly and may reproduce in their first summer. The western mosquitofish swims near the ILLINOIS RANGE surface, alone or in small groups, eating plant and animal materials that includes insects, spiders, small crustaceans, snails and duckweeds. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020.
    [Show full text]