Evaluation of the Peacebuilding Fund (PBF) Project Portfolio in Kyrgyzstan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of the Peacebuilding Fund (PBF) Project Portfolio in Kyrgyzstan Evaluation of the Peacebuilding Fund (PBF) Project Portfolio In Kyrgyzstan Evaluation Report Final 31 August 2017 Evaluation Team: • Dr. Terrence Jantzi (Team Leader) • Fernanda Faria (Peacebuilding Specialist) • Anara Alymkulova (National Context Specialist) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................... iii 2 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Country Context ............................................................................................................ 1 2.2 PBF Engagement in the Kyrgyz Republic .................................................................... 2 2.2.1 PBF Overview ............................................................................................................................ 2 2.2.2 Initial Response: 2010-2013 .................................................................................................... 2 2.3 PPP Implementation: 2013-2016 ................................................................................ 3 2.3.1 The Peacebuilding Needs and Priorities Assessment ............................................................. 3 2.3.2 PPP Overview ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.3.3 PPP Theory of Change .............................................................................................................. 5 2.3.4 PPP Supported Project Operationalization ............................................................................ 6 3 Evaluation Features ..................................................................................... 8 3.1 Evaluation Scope ......................................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 Evaluation Scope and Key Questions ...................................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Additional Considerations ....................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Evaluation Methodology ............................................................................................. 11 3.3 Evaluation Limitations ............................................................................................... 13 4 Evaluation Findings .................................................................................... 14 4.1 Impact – Political and Strategic Contributions .......................................................... 14 4.1.1 Outcome 1: Rule of Law .......................................................................................................... 14 4.1.2 Outcome 2: Local Self-Government Capacity ....................................................................... 17 4.1.3 Outcome 3: Common Civic Identity ...................................................................................... 20 4.2 PPP Structure and Management Processes ............................................................... 23 4.2.1 The PPP Development Process ............................................................................................... 23 4.2.2 PPP Coordination and Oversight .......................................................................................... 25 4.2.3 PPP Projects and Site Selection .............................................................................................. 28 4.2.4 Project Theory of Change Alignment with PPP ToCs .......................................................... 28 4.2.5 PPP Project Implementation and Efficiency ......................................................................... 30 4.2.6 PBF Performance, Catalytic Effects and Indirect Impacts ................................................. 34 4.2.7 Elements for Future Consideration ....................................................................................... 36 4.3 Sustainability, Gaps, and Future Directions ............................................................. 38 4.3.1 Sustainability .......................................................................................................................... 38 4.3.2 Peacebuilding Gaps and Future Directions .......................................................................... 39 5 Conclusions ................................................................................................ 41 5.1 Evaluation Dimensions............................................................................................... 41 5.2 Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 42 5.2.1 Management and Coordination Conclusions ....................................................................... 42 5.2.2 Programming Conclusions .................................................................................................... 43 5.2.3 PVE Considerations ................................................................................................................ 44 6 Recommendations ..................................................................................... 45 6.1 Coordination and Management Recommendations ................................................. 45 6.2 Future PRF Focused Recommendations ................................................................... 45 6.3 Sustainability Recommendations .............................................................................. 45 7 Annexes ..................................................................................................... 47 7.1 Annex 1: Terms of Reference ..................................................................................... 47 7.2 Annex 2: Municipalities and Project Distribution..................................................... 58 7.3 Annex 3: PPP and Individual Project Results Frameworks and Summaries ............ 60 7.3.1 PPP Results Framework ......................................................................................................... 60 7.3.2 PPP Catalytic Effects and Indirect Impacts .......................................................................... 61 7.3.3 Outcome 1: Rule of Law .......................................................................................................... 64 7.3.4 Outcome 2: Local Capacity Building...................................................................................... 71 7.3.5 Outcome 3: Common Civic Identity ...................................................................................... 75 7.4 Annex 4: Evaluation Matrix....................................................................................... 80 7.5 Annex 5: Evaluation Team Mission Schedule ........................................................... 86 7.6 Annex 6: List of Persons Interviewed ........................................................................ 88 7.7 Annex 7: Case Study Demographic Summaries ........................................................ 94 i 7.7.1 Kulundu Municipality............................................................................................................. 94 7.7.2 Shark Municipality ................................................................................................................. 94 7.7.3 Suzak Municipality ................................................................................................................. 96 7.8 Annex 8: Project by Project ToC Analysis ................................................................. 98 7.9 Annex 9: Documents Reviewed ............................................................................... 104 7.10 Annex 10: Data Collection Tools ............................................................................. 106 7.11 Annex 11: List of Acronyms ...................................................................................... 135 List of Tables Table 1: Key Priority Areas and Funding Allocations ................................................................ 5 Table 2: PPP Projects by Outcome and RUNO .......................................................................... 7 Table 3: Target and Control Municipalities in PPP Endline Study ............................................ 9 Table 4: Municipality Case Studies and Province and Districts visited .................................... 12 Table 5: Selected Project Level Indicators Outcome 1 – Rule of Law ....................................... 15 Table 6: PPP Endline Outcome 1 Indicators ............................................................................. 15 Table 7: Selected Project Level Indicators Outcome 2 –LSG Capacity ..................................... 17 Table 8: Selected PPP Endline Outcome 2 Indicators ..............................................................18 Table 9: Selected Project Level Indicators Outcome 3 – Civic Identity .................................... 21 Table 10: PPP Endline Outcome 3 Indicators ........................................................................... 21 Table 11: ToC Alignment from PPP to Activities by Project ..................................................... 29 Table 12: Project Expenditure Rates (Ordered by size of project) ............................................ 31 Table 13: Evaluation Summary by Dimension .......................................................................... 41 List of Figures
Recommended publications
  • Final Evaluation of the Building a Constituency for Peace Project
    2016 Final Evaluation of the Building a Constituency for Peace Project FINAL REPORT [НАЗВАНИЕ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ] | [Адрес организации] 0 Final Evaluation of the Building a Constituency for Peace Project Final Report December 2016 Prepared by: Natalia Kosheleva International Consultant E-mail: [email protected] Elmira Kerimalieva National Consultant E-mail: [email protected] 1 Content List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 10 2 Object and context of evaluation ............................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Project Theory of Change and expected results ............................................................................... 10 2.2 Project implementation .................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Project reach ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Impact and Financing of Infrastructure in the Kyrgyz Republic
    ADBI Working Paper Series MEASURING THE IMPACT AND FINANCING OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Kamalbek Karymshakov and Burulcha Sulaimanova No. 988 August 2019 Asian Development Bank Institute Kamalbek Karymshakov is an assistant professor at the Finance and Banking Department, Central Asian Research Center of the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University in Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic. Burulcha Sulaimanova is an assistant professor at the Economics Department also of the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. The Asian Development Bank refers to “Kyrgyzstan” as the Kyrgyz Republic. Suggested citation: Karymshakov, K. and B. Sulaimanova. 2019. Measuring the Impact and Financing of Infrastructure in the Kyrgyz Republic. ADBI Working Paper 988. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/measuring-impact-and-financing- infrastructure-kyrgyz-republic Please contact the authors for information about this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-JICA-Investment-Opportunities-2014
    Source: United Nations Cartographic Section Abbreviations ASEAN Association of South䇲East Asian Nations BOI Board of Investment CAD Computer Aided Design CAGR Compound Average Growth Rate CBTA Cross Border Transportation Agreement CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CMT Cut Make and Trim E/D Embarkation/Disembarkation EU European Union F/S Financial Statement FAOSTAT Food and Agriculture Organization stat GDP Gross Domestic Product ICT Information and Communication Technology IMF International Monetary Fund IT Information Technology JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency JNTO Japan National Tourist Organization KATO Kyrgyz Association of Tour Operators KPI Key Performance Indicator KSSDA Kyrgyz Software and Services Develops Association LNG Liquefied Natural Gas MBA Master of Business Administration MRP Machine Readable Passport NSC National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OEM Original Equipment Manufacturing OJT On-the-Job Training PET Polyethylene Terephthalate SPA Speciality store retailer of Private label Apparel TSA Tourism Satellite Account UAE United Arab Emirates UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNWTO United Nations World Tourism Organization WTO World Trade Organization Table of contents Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Selection of promising industries(initial macro data-based selection) ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Price Monitoring for Food Security in the Kyrgyz Republic
    Price Monitoring for Food Security in the Kyrgyz Republic Price Monitoring for Food Security in the Kyrgyz Republic Annual Review 2017 1 Price Monitoring for Food Security in the Kyrgyz Republic Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1. National and global wheat and wheat flour production ....................................................................................... 5 1.1. Fortified wheat flour production ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Wheat and wheat flour supply chain................................................................................................................ 7 1.3. International wheat and wheat flour prices ..................................................................................................... 7 1.4. Domestic wheat and wheat flour prices ........................................................................................................... 9 1.5. Introducing VAT on imported wheat/wheat flour prices ............................................................................... 10 1.6. Safety nets alert platform (SNAP) scenario planning ..................................................................................... 10 2. Vegetable production and prices .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vitality of the Kyrgyz Language in Bishkek
    ISSN: 2158-7051 ==================== INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN STUDIES ==================== ISSUE NO. 5 ( 2016/2 ) VITALITY OF THE KYRGYZ LANGUAGE IN BISHKEK SIARL FERDINAND*, FLORA KOMLOSI** Summary During the first decades after its independence from the USSR, Kyrgyzstan has intended to make of Kyrgyz a real state language. Since then, a new generation has been born and raised in the independent Kyrgyz Republic. Their linguistic behaviour may have a profound effect in the future of Kyrgyz. This study examines the linguistic situation in Bishkek. A questionnaire given to 125 students aged between 14 and 18 and direct observation in the streets were used to collect data. The preliminary results of the research show both, an almost total lack of interest in the state language by the local non-Kyrgyz students and a very weak attitude towards their national language by the young ethnic-Kyrgyz. It is expected that these results may help to create realistic and effective language policies to ensure the future of the Kyrgyz language in Bishkek and consequently in all the country in a balanced way. Key Words: Kyrgyz, language revival, Russian, bilingualism, Soviet Union, Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek. Introduction 1.1.The Kyrgyz Republic and the City of Bishkek The Kyrgyz Republic, also called Kyrgyzstan, is an ex-Soviet landlocked country situated in Central Asia. Three of its four neighbours, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan are also ex-Soviet republics while the fourth one is the People’s Republic of China. Before its independence, the territory which is currently known as Kyrgyzstan had been a part of the Russian Empire and of the International Journal of Russian Studies, No.
    [Show full text]
  • LANGUAGES Hans Christian Luschützky Department of Linguistics, University of Vienna
    LANGUAGES Hans Christian Luschützky Department of Linguistics, University of Vienna [email protected] http://homepage.univie.ac.at/hans.christian.luschuetzky/ Training Course on Toponymy Run-up to the 23rd Conference of the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names Vienna, March 2006 Speaking about language As an object of investigation, language is special in that we are forced to use it in order to make statements about it. Everything we say (or write) about words, phrases and sentences we can only say (or write) by means of words, phrases and sentences. The consequences of this metalinguistic dilemma are intricate and manifold and cannot be discussed here. It should be kept in mind, however, that speaking about language is a self- referential act, like shaking one’s own hand. The scope of language Language, as the most complex of all forms of human communicative behaviour, can be approached and investigated from basically two points of view: system and structure (internal aspect) function and domain (external aspect) Both approaches can be refined with respect to the historical (diachronic), geographical (areal) and social dimensions. The following brief survey will focus on intersections of internal and external aspects of language: variation, glottogenesis, glottodynamics, linguistic stratification and language profiling. Language system and linguistic structure Structural analysis of language systems is based on procedures of segmentation and classification (taxonomy). All human languages are similar with respect to the hierarchical organisation of structural levels: • textual • syntactic • lexical/morphological • phonological (notice that writing and orthography, although closely related to language, do not form a structural level of the language system but constitute a separate semiotic system) All human languages differ with respect to the formal implementation of the subsystems that are constituted according to the structural levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Situation Update 24 Ap
    DISASTER RESPONSE COORDINATION UNIT Kyrgyzstan: COVID-19 response Weekly situation update Date: 24 April 2020 This update is issued by the DRCU and summarizes current situation, DRCU and other partners’ support to the response effort for the period of 17-24 April 2020. Key statistics As of 24 April 2020 Total cases 700 Total number of 656 656 confirmed cases of 600 COVID-19 554 500 The number of new 25 419 cases from total 400 300 The number of human 8 216 losses 200 147 100 The number of 322 0 recovered cases 17-Mar 24-Mar 31-Mar 7-Apr 14-Apr 21-Apr On 18 March 2020 the first three cases were recorded in the Kyrgyz Republic that were detected among those, who returned from Umra pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. Kyrgyzstan’s Age group Number % from Security Council recommended the state of emergency on 22 March, total and the Government subsequently imposed stricter measures, placing checkpoints in every region and city, and shutting down Under 15 75 11.4 facilities (cafes, cinemas, shopping malls, and other entertainment From 16 to 19 18 2.7 places), leaving only grocery stores, food markets, pharmacies, and medical facilities. From 20 to 35 179 27.3 From 35 to 55 On 14 April based on the Decrees of the President of the Kyrgyz 239 36.4 Republic, the state of emergency in Bishkek, Osh, Jalal-Abad cities Above 55 145 22.1 and Kara-Suu, Nookat districts of Osh oblast, Suzak district of Jalal- Abad oblast has been extended until 30 April 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Situation of Children's Residential Institutions in the Kyrgyz Republic
    ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION OF CHILDREN'S RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION OF CHILDREN’S RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Analysis of the situation of children’s residential institutions in the Kyrgyz Republic – B.: 2012. – p.115 This publication is a product of a national study on children in child care residential institutions in the Kyrgyz Republic, which was carried out by Public Fund “My Family” upon the initiative and support of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in cooperation with the Ministry of Education and Science of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Ministry of Social Development of the Kyrgyz Republic during the period from September 2010 to January 2012. This research report fills current gaps in national data on children in child care residential institutions in the Kyrgyz Republic and provides an analysis of the situation in the institutions. It sheds light on the perspectives of children and caregivers and provides recommendations for improving the situation of these children. The findings of the report provide a foundation for the elaboration of further strategic programmes and action plans on child care system reform in the Kyrgyz Republic. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of the United Nations Children’s Fund and the organization does not bear any responsibility. ©UNICEF, 2012 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGMENTS…………………………………………………………………………. 4 ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………..………………… 4 GLOSSARY…………………………………………………………………………….……… 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………… 7 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………..……… 10 2. AIMS AND TASKS OF THE RESEARCH……………………………………………….. 14 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………….. 15 4. CLARIFYING THE DATA ON THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN’S RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS IN OPERATION IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC…………….…………….
    [Show full text]
  • 東中jr09004 中央アジア概況調査-En 0
    No. Regional and Country Profile: Central Asia, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan June 2009 Japan Interntional Cooperation Agency OPMAC Corporation 東中 JR 09-004 Outline of the Study 1-1 Backgrounds Bordered by Asia to the east and Europe to the west, Central Asia occupies a vital position in the Eurasian Continent. Possessing abundant underground reserves of petroleum, gas, gold, uranium ore and other underground resources, and occupying a strategically vital geopolitical location, Central Asia has historically been the focus of competing interests by various powers. Central Asia is surrounded by the superpowers of Russia and China, and today is affected by regional instability in the neighboring Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan, etc. Especially in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States in 2001, worldwide attention has been directed towards the stability and development of the whole South Asian region including this area and Afghanistan, and vested interests have become increasingly complicated. Moreover, against a background of growing energy demand in China, India and other parts of Asia, the stable supply of petroleum and natural gas from Central Asia helps stabilize the international energy market and enhances regional importance from the viewpoint of energy security too. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the republics of Central Asia respectively gained independence, and a number of regional organizations, i.e. the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and Eurasia Economic Community (EAEC), etc. were established under a mélange of economic, diplomatic and military interests in Central Asia and environs. Concerning relations with Japan, the concept of Silk Road Diplomacy was enunciated in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 International History Olympiad Historical Linguistics Exam 75 Questions – 40 Minutes
    2015 International History Olympiad Historical Linguistics Exam 75 Questions – 40 Minutes Scoring System: The scoring will be 2 points for a correct answer, 0 for a blank, and minus 1 for an incorrect response. Test Distribution Languages and Language Families (1-35) Historical Linguistic Terms (36-45) Languages in History (46-60) Historical Linguistics Problems (61-65) Writing Systems (66-70) History of Linguistics (71-75) Section 1 – Languages and Language Families (1-35) 1. Which of the following is an extinct branch of the Indo-European language family? A) Anatolian B) Assamese C) Slavic D) Celtic 2. Which of the following is a language isolate? A) Romanian B) Basque C) Icelandic D) Romansh 3. Which canton of Switzerland is where you would find the highest percentage of Romansh speakers? A) Zurich B) Graubunden C) Vaud D) Valais 4. Which of the following is a Romance language? A) German B) Bulgarian C) Portuguese D) Danish 5. Which of the following is a language primarily spoken by members of an ethnic group that originated in Northern India and now live primarily in Europe and the Americas? A) Telugu B) Kannada C) Romani D) Malayalam 6. After English and Sinhalese, which is the next most-widely spoken language on Sri Lanka? A) Hindi B) Dutch C) Tamil D) Bengali 7. Which is not considered a language or dialect grouping in the Sino-Tibetan Family? A) Mandarin B) Cantonese C) Wu D) Lao 8. Which language has the most native speakers? A) Greek B) Italian C) Turkish D) Spanish 9. The Roman Emperor Claudius compiled a dictionary of which language, formerly spoken in much of Northern Italy? A) Scythian B) Faliscan C) Celtiberian D) Etruscan 10.
    [Show full text]
  • National Council for Sustainable Development of the Kyrgyz Republic
    National Council for Sustainable Development of the Kyrgyz Republic NATIONAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC For the period of 2013-2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE: TO SUCCEED AS A STATE AND TO ESTABLISH FOUNDATION FOR SUCCESSFUL DEVELOPMENT OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC .................................................. 5 Chapter 1. KYRGYZSTAN AND MODERN CHALLENGES ........................................................... 5 1.1. Nation without priorities or twenty years in survival mode ................................................ 5 1.2. Expectations and realities of the post-April period ............................................................ 6 1.3. National Development Project – Strategic Vision .............................................................. 7 1.4. Five constructive years (2013-2107): to succeed as a state and lay the foundation for successful development of Kyrgyzstan ..................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2. ESTABLISHING A STATE GOVERNED BY THE RULE OF LAW AND ENSURING SUPREMACY OF LAW ................................................................................................................. 10 2.1. Strengthening of the legal system as a basic prerequisite for creating a country governed by the rule of law. ............................................................................................................................................ 10 2.2. Ensuring stability of the Constitution and laws, implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey in the Caspian Sea Region
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2008 Turkey In The Caspian Sea Region Seyma Akkoyunlu University of Central Florida Part of the Political Science Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Akkoyunlu, Seyma, "Turkey In The Caspian Sea Region" (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3734. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3734 TURKEY IN THE CASPIAN SEA REGION by SEYMA AKKOYUNLU B.S. Istanbul University, 2005 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of the Masters of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, FL Spring Term 2008 Major Professor: Houman Sadri ©2008 Seyma Akkoyunlu ii ABSTRACT This thesis will determine the influence of Turkey’s domestic resources on Turkey’s foreign relations with the five Turkic states in the Caspian Sea Region. The spheres analyzed in this study are the common ties, which are history, culture, religion and language, with the regional countries, pan-Turkism, Turkey’s initial interactions as well as ongoing constructive policies in the region. Findings showed that both Turkey and the five Turkic republics were enthusiastic to carry their relations in every field to future cooperation following the break up of the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]