DOCSLIB.ORG

The Virginia Coastal Hydrogeologic Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Virginia Coastal Hydrogeologic Framework Cover. Sediment-core drilling site near Bayside, Mathews County, Virginia (borehole local number 60G 5-7). View is southward overlooking tidal wetland to Chesapeake Bay on the horizon. During summer 2001, continuous core was obtained of sediments filling the 35-million-year­ old Chesapeake Bay impact crater, overlying post-impact sediment, and underlying crystalline bedrock at an altitude of –2,322 feet. The continuous wire-line hydraulic rotary coring rig shown was operated by staff of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Water Discipline Drilling Project in cooperation with the USGS Eastern Earth Surface Processes Team, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission. The Virginia Coastal Plain Hydrogeologic Framework By E. Randolph McFarland and T. Scott Bruce Prepared in cooperation with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Professional Paper 1731 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: McFarland, E.R., and Bruce, T.S., 2006, The Virginia Coastal Plain Hydrogeologic Framework: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1731, 118 p., 25 pls. (available online at http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/pp1731/) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McFarland, E. Randolph. The Virginia coastal plain hydrogeologic framework / by E. Randolph McFarland and T. Scott Bruce. -- lst ed. p. cm. -- (Professional paper ; 1731) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-4113-1065-9 (alk. paper) 1. Hydrogeology--Virginia. 2. Groundwater flow--Virginia. 3. Aquifers--Virginia I. Bruce, T. Scott, 1960- II. Title. GB1025.V8M34 2006 551.4909755--dc22 2006026537 iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................2 Description of Study Area ...................................................................................................................4 Geologic Setting ...........................................................................................................................4 Ground-Water Conditions ...........................................................................................................8 Methods of Investigation .....................................................................................................................8 Borehole Geophysical-Log Network ........................................................................................9 Borehole-Data Quality ..............................................................................................................10 Hydrogeologic Framework .........................................................................................................................14 Conceptual Development ..................................................................................................................14 Previous Investigations ............................................................................................................14 Pioneering Investigations by D.J. Cederstrom ............................................................14 Geologic Refinement ........................................................................................................14 Regional Aquifer-System Analysis .................................................................................15 Recent Hydrogeologic Advances ..................................................................................16 Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater and the James River Structural Zone ...................16 Stratigraphic and Structural Evolution ...................................................................................16 Formation of the Virginia Coastal Plain .........................................................................17 Cretaceous Period ............................................................................................................19 Tertiary Period ...................................................................................................................20 Late Paleocene and Early to Middle Eocene Epochs ........................................20 Late Eocene Epoch – Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater ......................................21 Oligocene, Miocene, and Pliocene Epochs ........................................................22 Quaternary Period ............................................................................................................23 Interpretive Analysis .................................................................................................................24 Hydrogeologic-Unit Classification .................................................................................25 Regional Correlation .........................................................................................................26 Limitations ..........................................................................................................................28 Hydrogeologic Units ...........................................................................................................................29 Potomac Aquifer ........................................................................................................................29 Geologic Relations ............................................................................................................31 Structural Configuration ..................................................................................................32 Recognition ........................................................................................................................33 Hydrologic Aspects ..........................................................................................................34 Potomac Confining Zone ..........................................................................................................35 Geologic Relations ............................................................................................................35 Structural Configuration ..................................................................................................37 Recognition ........................................................................................................................38 Hydrologic Aspects ..........................................................................................................38 Upper Cenomanian Confining Unit ..........................................................................................38 Geologic Relations ............................................................................................................40 Structural Configuration ..................................................................................................40 iv Recognition ........................................................................................................................41 Hydrologic Aspects ..........................................................................................................41 Virginia Beach Aquifer ..............................................................................................................42 Geologic Relations ............................................................................................................42 Structural Configuration ..................................................................................................42 Recognition ........................................................................................................................42 Hydrologic Aspects ..........................................................................................................44 Virginia Beach Confining Zone ................................................................................................44 Geologic Relations ............................................................................................................44 Structural Configuration ..................................................................................................46 Recognition ........................................................................................................................46 Hydrologic Aspects ..........................................................................................................47 Peedee Aquifer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upper Cenozoic Deposits of the Central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware
    Upper Ceoozoic Deposits GEOLOGICAL SXJEVilY FRQfEBSIONAL lAPEE Upper Cenozoic Deposits of the Central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware By JAMES P. OWENS and CHARLES S. DENNY SURFACE AND SHALLOW SUBSURFACE GEOLOGIC STUDIES IN THE EMERGED COASTAL PLAIN OF THE MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1067-A Upper Tertiary deltaic and shallow-water marine deposits form the backbone of the peninsula. The oldest marine deposits of Pleistocene age reach a maximum altitude of 15 meters (50 feet) and have been dated radiometrically at about 100,000 years UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Owens, James Patrick, 1924- Upper Cenozoic deposits of the central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland and Delaware. (Surface and shallow subsurface geologic studies in the emerged coastal plain of the Middle Atlantic States) (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1067-A) Bibliography: p. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1067-A 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cenozoic. 2. Geology Delmarva Peninsula. I. Denny, Charles Storrow, 1911- joint author. II. Title. III. Series. IV. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1067-A. QE690.093 551.7'8 77-608325 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03191-4 CONTENTS Abstract._____________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map and Cross Sections of the Leonardtown 30 X 60- Minute
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map and Cross Sections of the Leonardtown 30 X 60- Minute Quadrangle, Maryland and Virginia by Lucy McCartan1 Wayne L. Newell1 James P. Owens1 * Gary M. Bradford1** Open-File Report 95-665 Prepared in cooperation with the Maryland Geological Survey This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 Reston, Va. *Deceased **Volunteer for Science CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Map contruction 4 Mapping paradigms 4 Time 5 Depositional environments 5 Previous work 6 Geologic overview 6 Structural setting 7 Ground-water chemistry 9 Discussion of selected stratigraphic units 10 Pleistocene deposits 11 Lowland unit Q2 11 Lowland unit Q3 11 Lowland unit Q4 11 Lowland unit Q5 12 Pliocene deposits 13 Upland unit T1 13 Yorktown Formation 14 Miocene deposits 14 Eastover Formation 14 St. Marys Formation 15 Choptank Formation 15 Calvert Formation 16 Pre-Miocene units 16 Nanjemoy Formation 17 Marlboro Clay 18 Aquia Formation 18 Acknowledgements 19 References cited 20 Description of map units 26 TABLES Units found only below land surface (see cross sections) 28 Table 1 Regional correlation of stratigraphic units 29 Table 2 Ground-water chemistry of selected formations 30 Table 3 Some typical characteristics of stratigraphic units 34 FIGURES Explanation of map units 35 Map symbols 36 Figure 1 Map showing distribution of depositional lithofacies of the Yorktown Formation 37 GEOLOGIC MAP AND CROSS SECTIONS OF THE LEONARDTOWN 30 X 60 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA by Lucy McCartan, W.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Shore, VA
    Community Info Sheet Eastern Shore, VA Total Population (2010): 45,553 Accomack County: 33,164 North Hampton County: 12,389 Parksley, VA: 842 (Northampton and Accomack Counties comprise the Eastern Shore of Virginia.) Things Eastern Shore is known for: Chincoteague Island & Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, The Chesapeake Bay, The Annual Wild Pony Round Up, NASA Wallops Flight Facility of the Eastern Shore, Tyson & Purdue Chicken Processing Plants, The Crabbing and Fishing Industry Eastern Shore Overview: The Eastern Shore of Virginia offers a historic setting, serene lifestyle, and abundant outdoor recreation. It is a 70-mile-long stretch of shoreline at the southern end of the Delmarva Peninsula. It is comprised of two counties – Accomack and North Hampton – and is bordered by the Chesapeake Bay to the West, the Atlantic Ocean to the East, and Maryland to the North. It is accessible to mainland Virginia by the 23-mile-long Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel. Prior to its completion in 1964, mainland Virginia was only accessible by ferry, or by lengthy commute through Maryland and Washington D.C. Despite being largely isolated from mainland Virginia, the Eastern Shore has a robust agricultural The Delmarva Peninsula The Eastern Shore of Virginia economy. Crabbing and fishing industries share the coastline, while large-scale produce and chicken farms utilize much of the peninsula itself. Tyson and Accomack County Census 2010 Stats* Perdue both maintain poultry processing plants on the shore and are two of the largest employers in Population: 33,164 the area. The agricultural community has drawn Race: many Hispanic or Latino immigrants and migrant 68% White workers to the area; these workers spend all or 29% African American parts of their year working in farms or factories.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Contributions and Studies
    Thecachampsa antiqua (Leidy, 1852) (Crocodylidae: Thoracosaurinae) from Fossil Marine Deposits at Lee Creek Mine, Aurora, North Carolina, USA Albert C. Myrick, Jr. Formation (early Pliocene; Gibson, 1983; Hazel, 1983). It ABSTRACT provides a first opportunity to study the Lee Creek crocodilian materials in relation to other similar forms of comparable geo- Fossil remains of crocodilians at Lee Creek Mine have been few and fragmentary. Nevertheless, isolated teeth and dermal plates logic age. The purpose of this paper is to describe the Lee from the spoil piles are identifiable as Thecachampsa antiqua Creek Mine crocodilian specimens and to comment on the (Leidy). This species was established by Leidy on characters of taxonomic status and paleozoogeographic implications related teeth presumably from the Calvert Formation of Virginia (late to the Lee Creek Mine occurrence and to occurrences of early to early middle Miocene), but the species is now validated by skulls and numerous elements from the middle Miocene forma- closely related forms elsewhere. tions of the Chesapeake Group. The same form is common in the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.•The Lee Creek Mine specimens cit- Florida early Pliocene, where it is represented by several fairly ed in this report were collected and donated by P.J. Harmatuk, complete skeletons known as Gavialosuchus americanus (Sell- F. Hyne, and B. Hyne. I thank L.G. Barnes (Los Angeles arás). It also is known from numerous skulls from early and mid- County Museum of Natural History) for providing refresher dle Miocene formations near Lisbon, Portugal, as Tomistoma lusitanica (Vianna and Moraes). Teeth and a dermal scute indicat- information on the California specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Landforms of Virginia
    Vol. 34 August 1988 No. 3 SCENIC LANDFORMS OF VIRGINIA Harry Webb . Virginia has a wide variety of scenic landforms, such State Highway, SR - State Road, GWNF.R(T) - George as mountains, waterfalls, gorges, islands, water and Washington National Forest Road (Trail), JNFR(T) - wind gaps, caves, valleys, hills, and cliffs. These land- Jefferson National Forest Road (Trail), BRPMP - Blue forms, some with interesting names such as Hanging Ridge Parkway mile post, and SNPMP - Shenandoah Rock, Devils Backbone, Striped Rock, and Lovers Leap, National Park mile post. range in elevation from Mt. Rogers at 5729 feet to As- This listing is primarily of those landforms named on sateague and Tangier islands near sea level. Two nat- topographic maps. It is hoped that the reader will advise ural lakes occur in Virginia, Mountain Lake in Giles the Division of other noteworthy landforms in the st& County and Lake Drummond in the City of Chesapeake. that are not mentioned. For those features on private Gaps through the mountains were important routes for land always obtain the owner's permission before vis- early settlers and positions for military movements dur- iting. Some particularly interesting features are de- ing the Civil War. Today, many gaps are still important scribed in more detail below. locations of roads and highways. For this report, landforms are listed alphabetically Dismal Swamp (see Chesapeake, City of) by county or city. Features along county lines are de- The Dismal Swamp, located in southeastern Virginia, scribed in only one county with references in other ap- is about 10 to 11 miles wide and 15 miles long, and propriate counties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Recreation the Delmarva Peninsula by David
    THE RECREATION POTENTIAL OF THE DELMARVA PENINSULA BY DAVID LEE RUBIN S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1965) SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOT THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN CITY PLANNING at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June, 1966 Signature of Author.,.-.-,.*....... .. .*.0 .. .. ...... .. ...... ... Department of City and Regional Planning May 23, 1966 Certified by.... ....... .- -*s.e- Super....... Thesis Supervisor Accepted by... ... ...tire r'*n.-..0 *10iy.- .. 0....................0 Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Students 038 The Recreation Potential of the Delmarva Peninsula By David Lee Rubin Submitted to the Department of City and Regional Planning on 23 May, 1966 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning. rhis thesis is a plan for the development of Lne recreation potential of the Delmarva Peninsyla, the lower counties of Delaware and the Eastern Shore of Maryland and Virginia, to meet the needs of the Megalopolitan population. Before 1952, the Delmarva Peninsula was isolated, and no development of any kind occurred. The population was stable, with no in migration, and the attitudes were rural. The economy was sagging. Then a bridge was built across the Chesapeake Bay, and the peninsula became a recreation resource for the Baltimore and Washington areas. Ocean City and Rehoboth, the major resorts, have grown rapidly since then. In 1964, the opening of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel further accellerated growth. There are presently plans for the development of a National Seashore on Assateague Island, home of the Chincoteague ponies, as well as state parks along the Chesapeake Bay, and such facilities as a causeway through the ocean and a residential complex in the Indian River Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Salisbury/Wicomico Area Long-Range Transportation Plan
    Salisbury/Wicomico Area Long-Range Transportation Plan final report prepared for Salisbury/Wicomico Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Maryland Department of Transportation October 20, 2006 Salisbury/Wicomico Area Long-Range Transportation Plan Salisbury/Wicomico Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Board Members Marvin R. Long, Wicomico County, MPO Chair Rick Pollitt, City of Fruitland, MPO Vice Chair Michael P. Dunn, City of Salisbury Charles Fisher, Tri-County Council for the Lower Eastern Shore of Maryland Luther Hitchens, Town of Delmar, Maryland Mike Nixon, Maryland Department Of Transportation John F. Outten, Town of Delmar, Delaware (Non-Voting) Stevie Prettyman, Wicomico County Ralph Reeb, Delaware Department of Transportation (Non-Voting) Theodore E. Shea II, Wicomico County Barrie P. Tilghman, City of Salisbury Technical Advisory Committee John Redden, Wicomico County Department of Public Works, Chair Ray Birch, City of Salisbury Public Works, Vice Chair Dr. Kwame Arhin, Federal Highway Administration Brad Bellaccico, City of Salisbury Chamber of Commerce, Transportation Subcommittee Bob Bryant, Ocean City/Wicomico County Airport Authority Salisbury/Wicomico Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Salisbury/Wicomico Area Long-Range Transportation Plan Bob Cook, Delmarva Water Transport Advisory Committee, (Ex-Officio) James Dooley, State Highway Administration Tracey Gordy, Maryland Department of Planning Rob Hart, Shore Transit Lenny Howard, Maryland Transit Administration Dan Johnson, Federal Highway Administration
    [Show full text]
  • DGS OFR46.Qxd
    State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John H. Talley, State Geologist REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 75 STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION OF THE OLIGOCENE TO PLEISTOCENE SECTION AT BETHANY BEACH, DELAWARE by Peter P. McLaughlin1, Kenneth G. Miller2, James V. Browning2, Kelvin W. Ramsey1 Richard N. Benson1, Jaime L. Tomlinson1, and Peter J. Sugarman3 University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 1 Delaware Geological Survey 2008 2 Rutgers University 3 New Jersey Geological Survey State of Delaware DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John H. Talley, State Geologist REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 75 STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION OF THE OLIGIOCENE TO PLEISTOCENE SECTION AT BETHANY BEACH, DELAWARE by Peter P. McLaughlin1, Kenneth G. Miller2, James V. Browning2, Kelvin W. Ramsey1, Richard N. Benson,1 Jaime L. Tomlinson,1 and Peter J. Sugarman3 University of Delaware Newark, Delaware 2008 1Delaware Geological Survey 2Rutgers University 3New Jersey Geological Survey Use of trade, product, or firm names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the Delaware Geological Survey. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACTG........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTIONG................................................................................................................... 1 Previous WorkG.......................................................................................................... 2 AcknowledgmentsG.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lamniformes, Odontaspididae) from the Eocene of Antarctica Provides New Information About the Paleobiogeography and Paleobiology of Paleogene Sand Tiger Sharks
    Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia (Research in Paleontology and Stratigraphy) vol. 124(2): 283-298. July 2018 THE SOUTHERNMOST OCCURRENCE OF BRACHYCARCHARIAS (LAMNIFORMES, ODONTASPIDIDAE) FROM THE EOCENE OF ANTARCTICA PROVIDES NEW INFORMATION ABOUT THE PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHY AND PALEOBIOLOGY OF PALEOGENE SAND TIGER SHARKS GIUSEPPE MARRAMÀ1*, ANDREA ENGELBRECHT1, THOMAS MÖRS2, MARCELO A. REGUERO3 & JÜRGEN KRIWET1 1*Corresponding author. Department of Paleontology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2 Department of Paleozoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Division Paleontologia de Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, 81900 FWA La Plata, Argentina, CONICET. E-mail: [email protected] ARKU To cite this article: Marramà G., Engelbrecht A., Mörs T., Reguero M.A. & Kriwet J. (2018) - The southernmost occurrence of Brachycarcharias (Lamniformes, Odontaspididae) from the Eocene of Antarctica provides new information about the paleobiogeography and paleobiology of Paleogene sand tiger sharks. Riv. It. Paleontol. Strat., 124(2): 283-298. Keywords: Chondrichthyes; Elasmobranchii; Ypresian; La Meseta Formation; biotic turnovers. Abstract. The first record of one of the most common and widespread Paleogene selachians, the sand tiger shark Brachycarcharias, in the Ypresian strata of the La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctica, is pro- vided herein. Selachians from the early Eocene horizons of this deposit represent the southernmost Paleogene occurrences in the fossil record, and are represented by isolated teeth belonging to orectolobiforms, lamniforms, carcharhiniforms, squatiniforms and pristiophoriforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Choptane Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE CHOPTANE QUADRANGLE. By Benjamin Leroy Miller. INTRODUCTION. ment of water power, are located such important towns and dip. The oldest strata dip 50 to 60 feet to the mile in some cities as Trenton, Philadelphia, Wilmington, Baltimore, Wash­ places, but the succeeding beds are progressively less steeply LOCATION AND AREA. ington, Fredericksburg, Richmond, Petersburg, Raleigh, Cam- inclined and in the youngest deposits a dip of more than a few The Choptank quadrangle lies between parallels 38° 30' and den, Columbia, Augusta, Macon, and Columbus. A line drawn feet to the mile is uncommon. 39° north latitude and meridians 76° and 76° 30' west through these places would approximately separate the Coastal longitude. It includes one-fourth of a square degree of the Plain from the Piedmont Plateau. TOPOGRAPHY. earth's surface and contains 931.51 square miles. From north The Coastal Plain is divided by the present shore line into RELIEF. to south it measures 34.5 miles and from east to west its mean two parts a submerged portion, known as the continental INTRODUCTION. width is 27 miles, as it is 27.1 miles wide along the southern shelf or continental platform, and a,n emerged portion, com­ and 26.9 miles along the northern border. monly called the Coastal Plain. In some places the line sepa­ The altitude of the land in the Choptank quadrangle ranges rating the two parts is marked by a sea cliff of moderate from sea level to 120 feet above. The highest point lies about 77 height, but commonly they grade into each other with scarcely 2 miles south of Annapolis on the western margin of the quad­ perceptible change and the only mark of separation is the shore rangle.
    [Show full text]
  • LD5655.V855 1996.C395.Pdf (7.970Mb)
    DYNAMIC SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF FOSSIL DINOFLAGELLATES FROM THE ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN, USA. by Jon Clayton Cawley Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES APPROVED: RAOK BAL Richard K. Bambach, Chairman SpunIH. Yuedim —— LBs A fh Dewey M. McLean Bruce C. Parker July, 1996 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Dinoflagellate, Eocene, Virginia, Systems dynamics, Community, Modeling. ™ Cooes oea AAG CANS eC = ee § og DYNAMIC SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF FOSSIL DINOFLAGELLATES FROM THE ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN, USA. by Jon Clayton Cawley R.K. Bambach, Chairman Geological Sciences ABSTRACT Dynamic Systems modeling suggests that complex coastal dinoflagellate bio- systems can be modeled using environmental parameters such as temperature, salinity, and bulk nutrient levels. The former Salisbury Embayment of northern Virginia and Maryland is modeled here, using STELLA I and FORTRAN models based on physical oceanography and temperature, salinity, and nutrient conditions of the modern Yellow Sea. In these models, dinoflagellate assemblages are predicted based on environmental conditions associated with depth. Cluster analyses of fossil dinoflagellate frequency data from Tertiary Pamunky Group (Aquia and Nanjemoy Formations) of the Salisbury Embayment produce 17 discrete groupings. Samples within the Salisbury fossil cluster groups are statistically similar (via ANOVA analysis), but not the same. Therefore they represent paleocommunity types rather than paleocommunities. Although individual sinofiagellate species reccur in similar environmental settings, the paleocommunity types do not appear to repeat. In the past, such associations have been used as depth indicators. It is suggested here that they relate to estuarine, nearshore, and offshore coastal regions because of the temperature, salinity, and nutrient conditions of each.
    [Show full text]
  • (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Paleocene (Tiffanian) of Southern California
    PaleoBios 31(1):1–7, May 13, 2014 A lithornithid (Aves: Palaeognathae) from the Paleocene (Tiffanian) of southern California THOMAS A. STIDHAM,1* DON LOFGREN,2 ANDREW A. FARKE,2 MICHAEL PAIK,3 and RACHEL CHOI3 1Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China; e-mail: [email protected], corresponding author. 2Raymond M. Alf Museum of Paleontology, Claremont, California 91711, USA. 3 The Webb Schools, Claremont, California 91711, USA The proximal end of a bird humerus recovered from the Paleocene Goler Formation of southern California is the oldest Cenozoic record of this clade from the west coast of North America. The fossil is characterized by a relatively large, dorsally-positioned head of the humerus and a subcircular opening to the pneumotricipital fossa, consistent with the Lithornithidae among known North American Paleocene birds, and is similar in size to Lithornis celetius. This specimen from the Tiffanian NALMA extends the known geographic range of lithornithids outside of the Rocky Mountains region in the United States. The inferred coastal depositional environment of the Goler Formation is consistent with a broad ecological niche of lithornithids. The age and geographic distribution of lithornithids in North America and Europe suggests these birds dispersed from North America to Europe in the Paleocene or by the early Eocene. During the Paleogene the intercontinental dispersal of lithornithids likely occurred alongside other known bird and mammalian movements that were facilitated by climatic and sea level changes. Keywords: bird humerus, fossil, Lithornithidae, Goler Formation, Tiffanian, California INTRODUCTION largely unknown in North America.
    [Show full text]