DOCSLIB.ORG

Encoded Archival Description Tag Library

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Encoded Archival Description Tag Library Encoded Archival Description Tag Library Version 2002 Prepared and Maintained by the Encoded Archival Description Working Group of the Society of American Archivists and the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress Chicago Encoded Archival Description Tag Library, Version 2002 EAD Technical Document No. 2 This tag library represents version 2002 of the Encoded Archival Description Document Type Definition (DTD), released in August 2002. It supersedes the Version 1.0 tag library published in 1998. The SAA Encoded Archival Description Working Group is responsible for updating and editing the EAD DTD (EAD Technical Document No. 1) and tag library. The Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress serves as the maintenance agency for online EAD documentation, including storage and delivery of electronic files and maintenance of the EAD web site, located at http://lcweb.loc.gov/ead/. Available from: The Society of American Archivists 17 North State Street, Suite 1425 Chicago, IL 60602-3315 USA 312/606-0722 Toll Free 866/722-7858 Fax: 312/606-0728 www.archivists.org 2002, 2003 by the Society of American Archivists. All rights reserved. First edition 2002 Revised 2003 Printed in the United States of America ISBN 1-931666-00-8 ii Table of Contents Preface ........................................................................................................……….v Tag Library Conventions ..................................................................................…..1 EAD Attributes ...................................................................................................….5 Introduction .............................................................................................…7 General Attributes .................................................................................…. 10 Linking Attributes ..................................................................................…18 Tabular Display Attributes ......................................................................... 20 EAD Elements ....................................................................................................…23 Appendix A: Crosswalks ...................................................................................…261 Appendix B: Deprecated and Obsolete Elements and Attributes ......................…267 Appendix C: Encoded Examples ........................................................................…283 Appendix D: Index by Element Name ................................................................…305 iii iv Preface The Society of American Archivists Encoded Archival Description Working Group1 is pleased to bring you EAD 2002, the second full version of the encoding standard for archival finding aids. This version represents a truly international collaboration in the continued development and maintenance of EAD. In 2000 the International Council on Archives Committee on Descriptive Standards published the second edition of the General International Standard Archival Description (ISAD(G)). One of the guiding principles of EAD is to maintain compatibility with ISAD(G). Many of the suggestions submitted to the Working Group in late 2000 and early 2001 reflected changes needed to maintain that compatibility; they have been accommodated in this version through the addition of new elements and/or attributes or through clarification of existing element and attribute definitions. Experimentation with EAD internationally, particularly recent tests in France and Germany, has shown that EAD is applicable to a variety of descriptive practices but also has indicated the need for structural changes. Some of the more significant changes are as follows: There are two new elements in the Descriptive Identification of the Unit <did>: Language of the Material <langmaterial>, and Material Specific Details <materialspec>. Replacing the LANGMATERIAL attribute in <archdesc> and <c>, the <langmaterial> element makes it possible to provide intelligible information about language(s) to the end user. Information such as scale for technical drawings and maps and playing time for sound recordings can be expressed in <materialspec>, expanding EAD's applicability beyond "traditional" archival materials. Archival Description <archdesc> (and therefore all components) also has some new elements. Location of Originals <originalsloc> parallels the originals/copies aspect of Alternative Form Available <altformavail>. Physical Characteristics and Technical Requirements <phystech> accommodates the new ISAD(G) rule 3.4.4, and indicates whether there are unusual physical aspects or if special equipment is needed to access the materials. Legal Status <legalstatus>, a new subelement of <accessrestrict>, replaces the former LEGALSTATUS attribute on <archdesc>. A new subelement in the <profiledesc> header element, Descriptive Rules <descrules>, accommodates the new ISAD(G) element 3.7.2 to provide the descriptive code used to create the finding aid. 1 At the time of this revision members of the Working Group were: Randall Barry (Library of Congress Network Development and MARC Standards Office), Catherine Dhérent (Archives de France), Michael Fox (Minnesota Historical Society), Tim Hutchinson (University of Saskatchewan), Kris Kiesling (University of Texas at Austin), William Landis (University of California, Irvine), Gavan McCarthy (University of Melbourne), Daniel Pitti (University of Virginia), Merrilee Proffitt (Research Libraries Group, ex officio), Lydia Reid (National Archives and Records Administration), and Meg Sweet (Public Record Office). v Structural changes have also been implemented in EAD 2002. Administrative Information <admininfo> and Adjunct Descriptive Data <add> have been "unbundled," i.e., the elements that were formerly nested within these two elements are now available directly in <archdesc> and <c>. While they provided a useful grouping tool at the highest level of description, frequently the need to open, for example, <admininfo> to use <accessrestrict> at the component level simply created tagging overhead. It should be noted that the use of <admininfo> and <add> is being deprecated by the Working Group (see Appendix B). This means that the Working Group recommends discontinuing their use because this structure will be eliminated in a future version of EAD. To facilitate grouping of elements on an as-needed basis, another new <archdesc> element has been created, Description Group <descgrp>. <descgrp> can be used to bundle most of the structural elements (except <did> and <dsc>), enabling archivists to group them logically at a given level of description. EAD 2002 presents a host of new attributes, and most of the semi-closed lists of attribute values have been eliminated. In most cases, the semi-closed lists were very Anglo- centric and inhibited international adoption of EAD (e.g., the list of controlled vocabulary thesauri for the SOURCE attribute). It will now be the responsibility of individual repositories to use consistently the code lists and terminology recommended by national practices. Finally, archivists persuasively articulated the need for certain elements and attributes in places where they weren't available in EAD version 1.0. As a result, <title> is now available in <indexentry>, and "singlequote" and "doublequote" have been added as values for the RENDER attribute, in addition to other improvements. The Working Group gratefully acknowledges all who took the time to contribute to this version of EAD. EAD is stronger for your attention and interest! In addition, we extend our deep appreciation to the National Historical Publications and Records Commission, which has provided funding to support Working Group meetings. Like many efforts of its kind, most of the work of bringing EAD 2002 to fruition was shouldered by a small group of dedicated souls. I'd like to extend my personal thanks to Daniel Pitti at the University of Virginia for once again revising the DTD (and revising…and revising…), to Michael Fox of the Minnesota Historical Society for writing definitions of new elements and attributes and for drafting a conversion script and testing the new DTD, to Tim Hutchinson of the University of Saskatchewan for careful proofreading, and to Merrilee Proffitt of the Research Libraries Group and Bill Landis of the University of California at Irvine for gathering and parsing the examples. KRIS KIESLING Chair, EAD Working Group vi Tag Library Conventions The EAD Elements section of the tag library contains descriptions of 146 elements, which are arranged alphabetically by their tag names. The Index by Element Name (Appendix D) makes it possible to locate those elements with tag names that might be hard to find alphabetically. For example, the index entry for Conditions Governing Use points to the tag name <userestrict>. The Index by Element Name also serves as a concise, easily browsable list of all EAD elements. The EAD Elements section presents information for each element as shown in Figure 1. Some of a DTD's specialized terminology is explained on the following pages as a reminder of basic SGML/XML conventions involved in encoding documents with EAD.2 Tag name Element name Description <event> Event Description: That part of a Chronology List Item <chronitem> which describes or names something that happened. The <event> is paired with a <date> (a single date or date range) and can be grouped with other events in <eventgrp>, if multiple events need to be associated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The OCLC Research Survey of Special Collections and Archives
    Taking Our Pulse: The OCLC Research Survey of Special Collections and Archives Jackie M. Dooley Program Officer Katherine Luce Research Intern OCLC Research A publication of OCLC Research Taking Our Pulse: The OCLC Research Survey of Special Collections and Archives Taking Our Pulse: The OCLC Research Survey of Special Collections and Archives Jackie M. Dooley and Katherine Luce, for OCLC Research © 2010 OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Reuse of this document is permitted as long as it is consistent with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 (USA) license (CC-BY-NC- SA): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. October 2010 Updates: 15 November 2010, p. 75: corrected percentage in final sentence. 17 November 2010, p. 2: added Creative Commons license statement. 28 January 2011, p. 25, penultimate para., line 3: deleted “or more” following “300%”; p. 26, final para., 5th line: changed 89 million to 90 million; p. 30, final para.: changed 2009-10 to 2010-11; p. 75, final para.: changed 400 to 80; p. 76, 2nd para.: corrected funding figures; p. 90, final line: changed 67% to 75%. OCLC Research Dublin, Ohio 43017 USA www.oclc.org ISBN: 1-55653-387-X (978-1-55653-387-7) OCLC (WorldCat): 651793026 Please direct correspondence to: Jackie Dooley Program Officer [email protected] Suggested citation: Dooley, Jackie M., and Katherine Luce. 2010. Taking our pulse: The OCLC Research survey of special collections and archives. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2010/2010-11.pdf. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2010/2010-11.pdf October 2010 Jackie M.
    [Show full text]
  • OCLC Annual Report 2008/2009
    OCLC Annual Report 2008/2009 Learning Member-governed Web-scale Advocacy Innovation Member-owned Global Metadata Since 1967 Founded in 1967, OCLC is a nonprofit, membership, computer library service and research organization dedicated to the public purposes of furthering access to the world’s information and reducing library costs. More than 72,000 libraries in 171 countries have used OCLC services to locate, acquire, catalog, lend, preserve and manage library materials. Researchers, students, faculty, scholars, professional librarians and other information seekers use OCLC services to obtain bibliographic, abstract and full-text information when and where they need it. OCLC and its member libraries cooperatively produce and maintain WorldCat—the OCLC Online Union Catalog. Contents 2 To the Membership 6 Year in Review 12 WorldCat 17 Going forward into a new era 38 Board of Trustees 39 Strategic Leadership Team 40 OCLC Members Council 43 Advisory Committees 44 OCLC Directory 46 OCLC Network Affiliates 47 OCLC Staff Teams 51 OCLC Financial Report Cooperative Digital Learning WorldCat Member-governed Public purposes Nonprofi t Web-scale Research Advocacy Innovation Member-owned Archives Global Metadata Shared infrastructure Since 1967 Connecting people to knowledge through library cooperation Furthering access to the world’s information Reducing the rate of rise of per-unit costs 1 To the Membership Mr. Zhan Furui, Director-General, National Library of China (NLC), and I toast the 100th anniversary of the NLC at a gala celebration on September 8, 2009 in Beijing, China. In fiscal 2009, the NLC developed software to convert the format of its records so they could be added to WorldCat and displayed in Chinese characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Librarianship and Librarians
    COUNCIL ON LIBRARY RESOURCES, INC. THIRTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT/1988 1785 Massachusetts Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The scholar at his book-wheel is a reproduction of an engraving in Agostino Ramelli's Le diverse et arti/iciose machine . Paris, 1588. It first appeared in the Council's third annual report, with the following explanation: "the picture symbolizes the interest of the Council on Library Resources in both the content of books and the mechanics of library service." The engraving has appeared in each annual report since that time. This 32nd Annual Report has been set in Garamond by Circle Graphics. The report was printed by Goetz Printing Company on Mohawk Vellum, an acid-free, stable, and enduring paper manufactured by Mohawk Paper Mills, Cohoes, N .Y. The cover and title page were designed by Ruth Magann. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences- Perma­ nence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Council on Library Resources Report. 1st- 1956/57- Washington. v. 23cm. annual. Report year ends June 30. 1. Library Science--Research. Z673.C96A15 020.624 58-915 rev. Library of Congress ISSN 0070-1181 Contents 4 Members of the Council and of the Board of Directors 5 Committees and Officers 6 Staff and Consultants 7 Foreword 9 Program Review 10 The Fourth Decade 20 Research 25 Access to Information 29 Bibliographic Services 32 Librarianship and Librarians 40 Preservation 44 Appendix A: Program Committees and Project Participants 47 Appendix B: Publications and Reports Resulting from CLR Programs, 1987/1988 51 Appendix C: Program Guidelines and Grant Application Procedures 53 Active Projects and Financial Statements, 198711988 54 Acknowledgement 55 Grants & Contracts Active in Fiscal 1988 66 Report of Independent Accountants and Financial Statements 73 Index 4 MEMBERS OF THE Page Ackerman COUNCIL AND University Librarian Emeritus MEMBERS OF THE University of California, Los Angeles BOARD OF DIRECTORS William O.
    [Show full text]
  • Central University Libraries Strategic Plan PROGRESS
    Central University Libraries Strategic Plan 2000-2005+ PROGRESS UPDATE 2005-2006 Southern Methodist University Central University Libraries Southern Methodist University Strategic Plan 2000-2005+ PROGRESS UPDATE 2005-2006 A. SUPPORT SMU'S ACADEMIC, RESEARCH AND COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 1) Develop, manage, organize and preserve collections to support the University's instructional and research programs a) Optimize purchasing power for collections (1) Identify additional opportunities for consortial agreements • Initiated a deal with Springer that makes nearly all of their journals accessible to the SMU community through a complex consortial deal • Moved ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) periodicals to AMIGOS for consortial discount (2) Partner with campus schools and departments to secure additional resources • Continued cooperative arrangements with the Business Information Center to purchase Web of Science in addition to several business products • Worked with English Department to design funding allocation plan for monies received in support of the new Ph.D. in English (3) Continue to review periodicals listings • Reviewed Statistics department’s periodicals holdings in order to add subject matter of greater current interest (4) Continue to move along the print/electronic continuum where possible; cancel/discard print and purchase new electronic subscriptions where appropriate • Springer journals will be e-only for the first time, as are ACM journals. In both cases, SMU will save both subscription costs and binding costs (5) Reduce binding for JSTOR e-journals and others, in conjunction with consortial libraries • Ongoing (6) Participate in curricular review of new programs to ensure that each one assesses library impact • Assessed all new programs as a member of the Educational Programs Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Converting to MARC AMC: Some Early Observations
    The Cost of Converting to MARC AMC: Some Early Observations PATRICIA D. CLOUD THEMARC ARCHIVALAND Manuscripts Control (AMC) format is rapidly becoming the centerpiece for the new orthodoxy in archival automation. Archivists who wish now or in the future to adopt auto- mated intellectual control procedures or to exchange descriptive infor- mation with other archivists will be subject to practical and professional pressures to accommodate the MARC AMC format. New possibilities for local implementations are emerging; the size and signif- icance of online archival databases are growing; national standards, documentation, and guidelines are in place. Everything, it seems, is ready to go. Nevertheless, critical issues surrounding automation with MARC AMC format remain unexamined. One of the chief issues is the cost in time and resources of using the new format. At a time when so many repositories are planning first-time automation projects using MARC AMC, it may be wise to review some of the experiences of archives who were pioneer users. The cost of creating MARC AMC records will vary greatly among institutions, depending in part on whether or not a bibliographic utility, such as OCLC or RLIN,l or a local system, such as NOTIS,'is used; if a local system is used, costs will be affected by the type of system and by the anticipated uses for the MARC records. However, in addition Patricia D. Cloud is Assistant University Archivist, Northwestern University Archives, University Library, Evanston, Illinois. WINTER 1988 573 PATRICIA CLOUD to the major costs of participating in a bibliographic utility or instal- ling a local system, or the purchase of hardware, software, or subscrip- tion fees-issues that are beyond the scope of this essay-staff time will be the most significant cost factor in the creation of MARC AMC records.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago 2 0 0 7 Preliminary Program
    ARCHIVES ChiCago 2 0 0 7 PrelImInary PRogram Make no LittLe PLans... Photos Courtesy of the Chicago History Museum History Chicago the of Courtesy Photos think BiG! Plan now to attend SAA’s 71st Annual MeetinG August 28 – September 1, 2007 The Fairmont Chicago Early Bird Registration Deadline: June 29 Hotel Reservation / Conference Rate Deadline: July 27 ReGister Now and save! ARCHIVES / CHICAGO 2007 Preliminary Program – Promo Copy & Table of Contents (Page 1) Think BiG! Plan now to attend SAA’s 71st AnnuAl MeeTinG — The premier educational event of the year for archives professionals… Contents Thought-provoking and informative plenary sessions… Join Us in SAA’s Sweet Home! ...........................................................................2 Practical tips that you can put to use as soon as you return to Coming “Home” (Program Committee) ........................................................3 work – and discussions of research and theory that advance your profession to new heights… General Information ................................................................................................6 A chance for first-timers and new members to see what it’s all Attention First Timers and New Members!.................................................6 about – all in one place and all at one time… Information for Students ......................................................................................7 In-depth coverage of an archival topic of special interest to you Pre-conference Programs ....................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Sum of the Parts: Sharing the Responsibility for Bibliographic Control. Minutes of the Meeting of the Association of Research Libraries (103Rd, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, October
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 244 630 IR 050 728 AUTHOR Daval, Nicola, Ed. TITLE The Sum of the Parts: Sharing the Responsibility for Bibliographic Control. Minutes of the Meeting of the Association of Research Libraries_(103rd, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, October 19-20, 1983). INSTITUTION Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 84 NOTE 103p.; For related documentS, t66 ED 234 785 and ED 238 437. AVAILABLE FROMAssociation of Research Libraries, 1527 New Hampshire Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036 (ARL Members:$15.00 $25.00 per * per year, $7.50 per copy. Non-members: year, $12.50 per copy). PUB TYPE Collected Works Conference Proceedings (021) Viewpoints (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Cataloging; Library Administration; Library Associations; *Library Catalogs; *Library Materials; Library Research; Meetings; *Policy Formation; *Research Libraries IDENTIFIERS Access Control; *Bibliographic Control;,Library of Congress ABSTRACT Program presentations on issues related to bibliographic control and access to collectiont andbusiness meeting minutes are combined in this report. Underthe program title, "The Sum of the Parts: Sharing Responsibility,"the following addresses are included:(1) "The Building Blocks: Eltments in a System of Distributed Responsibility," by Martin Runkle; (2) "The Keystone:The Role of the Library of Congress," Lucia Rather;(3) "The Barriers: Knowing and Facing the Problems," Henriette Avram; and(4) "The Blueprint: A Plan for Action," David Bishop. Aconcluding discussion covers points from
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographic Utility Networks Anup Kumar Das Email: [email protected]
    BIBLIOGRAPHIC UTILITY NETWORKS ANUP KUMAR DAS EMAIL: [email protected] 1 INTRODUCTION The bibliographic utility is a network consisting of a large union bibliographic database, accessible online to member libraries on time-sharing basis. It is an organisation that provides access to and support for bibliographic databases directly to member libraries or through a network of regional bibliographic service centres, usually via a proprietary interface. There are a number of definitions of bibliographic utilities. A definition of bibliographic utilities as given by W. Saffady [6] is more appropriate, which is: “Bibliographic utilities” is the collective name for a group of computer service organizations that maintain large data bases of cataloging records, and offer various cataloging support services and related products to libraries and other customers who access those records on an online, timesharing basis. The data bases maintained by most bibliographic utilities are essentially online union catalogs. Bibliographic utility networks in most cases initially obtained machine-readable cataloguing records from either a national library (e.g. Library of Congress) or any other subscription based sources or vendors. Their union databases also comprise of bibliographic records contributed by participating libraries. Their bibliographic records include two kinds of information: (1) descriptive cataloguing and classification data in the MARC (Machine-Readable Cataloguing) format appropriate to the form of item being catalogued , and (2) holdings information for libraries that have added specific items to their collections. The major bibliographic utility networks offer software for downloading, editing, and local record creation; authority control utilising the Library of Congress (or, any other standard) authority files; and services to facilitate interlibrary loan based on holdings information included in each record.
    [Show full text]
  • Administering Manuscripts Cataloging Grant Projects Requires Planning and Flexibility
    THE AMERICAN ARCHIVIST Life with Grant: Administering Manuscripts Cataloging Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/american-archivist/article-pdf/62/1/130/2749155/aarc_62_1_3456p7nj20106u42.pdf by guest on 23 September 2021 Grant Projects Susan Hamburger Abstract Administering manuscripts cataloging grant projects requires planning and flexibility. The author uses three separate retrospective conversion projects for personal papers at the Library of Virginia (formerly the Virginia State Library and Archives), the University of Virginia, and the Virginia Historical Society as the basis for discussing staffing, training, record quality, workflow, and quality control. The author points out the problem areas and the successes, and makes suggestions for future manuscripts cataloging retrospective conversion projects. Introduction etrospective conversion of finding aids and typed catalog cards to machine-readable cataloging in local and national databases often Rrequires outside funding and additional staffing. Many repositories, from small one-person shops to large research institutions, benefit from coop- erative grant projects. Funding agencies look more favorably on applications that offer access to nationally important collections, with a thematically orga- nized focus, and that combine the resources of several institutions. Proper and adequate planning before writing the grant proposal can avoid most problems with staffing, workflow, cataloging, and quality control. This article examines three manuscripts cataloging grant projects in Virginia repositories to discover the problems encountered, explicate lessons learned, and make recommenda- tions for managing future retrospective cataloging projects. Literature Review There is a paucity of documentation in the archival literature on managing grant projects. Instead we find fragments that can be applied to writing grant proposals—practical applications of processing times and technical discussions 130 The American Archivist, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Library Resources Technical Services
    Library Resources & ISSN 0024-2527 Technical Services January 2010 Volume 54, No. 1 Year of Cataloging Research Randy Roeder Name Authority Work Today Susan K. Burke and Jay Shorten Identifying Standard Practices in Research Library Book Conservation Liz Dube and Whitney Baker The Distributions of MARC Fields in Bibliographic Records Matthew Mayernik The Association for Library Collections & Technical Services 54 ❘ 1 Library Resources & Technical Services (ISSN 0024-2527) is published quarterly by the American Library Association, 50 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. It is the official publication of the Association Library Resources for Library Collections & Technical Services, a division of the American Library Association. Subscription price: to members of the Association & for Library Collections & Technical Services, Technical Services $27.50 per year, included in the membership dues; to nonmembers, $85 per year in U.S., Canada, and Mexico, and $95 per year in other foreign coun- ISSN 0024-2527 January 2010 Volume 54, No. 1 tries. Single copies, $25. Periodical postage paid at Chicago, IL, and at additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Library Guest Editorial 2 Resources & Technical Services, 50 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. Business Manager: Charles Year of Cataloging Research Wilt, Executive Director, Association for Library Randy Roeder Collections & Technical Services, a division of the American Library Association. Send manuscripts to the Editorial Office: Peggy Johnson, Editor, Library Resources & Technical Services, University Articles of Minnesota Libraries, 499 Wilson Library, 309 19th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55455; (612) 624- 2312; fax: (612) 626-9353; e-mail: m-john@umn Name Authority Work Today 4 .edu.
    [Show full text]
  • AIMS Born-Digital Collections: an Inter-Institutional Model for Stewardship
    AIMS Born-Digital Collections: An Inter-Institutional Model for Stewardship January 2012 University of Hull Stanford University University of Virginia Yale University Acknowledgement The AIMS Project is a partnership between the University of Virginia Libraries, Stanford University Libraries and Academic Resources, the University of Hull Library, and Yale University Library with support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Suggested citation: AIMS Work Group. 2012. AIMS Born-Digital Collections: An Inter-Institutional Model for Stewardship. http://www2.lib.virginia.edu/aims/whitepaper/AIMS_final.pdf. Tabl e o f Co n te n ts Foreword i The AIMS Framework: The Functions of Stewardship 1 1. Collection Development 4 Donors and Trust: University of Hull 8 Enhanced Curation at the British Library 13 2. Accessioning 17 Evolution of Accessioning at University of Hull 21 Project Xanadu: Loss and Recovery 25 3. Arrangement and Description 31 Technical Development: Functional Requirements for Arrangement and Description 33 Arrangement and Description Case Study: The Papers of Stephen Gallagher 36 4. Discovery and Access 44 Visualizing Email Access: MUSE 48 Access models (Table 1) 51 Publication Pathway and Discovery and Access at the Bodleian Library 56 Discovery models (Table 2) 59 Conclusions 63 Appendix A: Glossary 64 Appendix B: Bibliography 72 Appendix C: Contributor Biographies 76 Appendix D: Institutional Summaries and Collection Descriptions 83 1. The University of Hull, University Archives at Hull History Centre 83 2. Stanford University, Stanford University Libraries & Academic Information Resources 86 3. The University of Virginia, Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library 91 4. Yale University 93 Appendix E: Sample Processing Plans 96 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Nature of the Catalog and Its Integration with Other Discovery Tools
    FINAL REPORT March 17, 2006 The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools Prepared for the Library of Congress By Karen Calhoun Cornell University Library Ithaca, NY 14853 [email protected] Changing Nature of the Catalog 2 Calhoun Table of Contents The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools ...... 1 Table of Contents............................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary........................................................................................................ 5 Highlights.................................................................................................................... 5 Notes to the Reader..................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: Introduction................................................................................................... 7 Background................................................................................................................. 7 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology: Research Process and Starting Points.................................................. 8 Structured Interviews.................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 2: The Catalog’s Future....................................................................................
    [Show full text]