DOCSLIB.ORG

GSA Bulletin: Synthesis and Revision of Groups Within the Newark

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GSA Bulletin: Synthesis and Revision of Groups Within the Newark Synthesis and revision of groups within the Newark Supergroup, eastern North America Robert E. Weems U.S. Geological Survey, M.S. 926A, Reston, Virginia 22092 Paul E. Olsen Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964 ABSTRACT sills, places Newark Supergroup rocks in the basins; and the Fundy Group in various areas of Agawam Group. Application of this new re- the Fundy basin), one group encompasses the en- The Newark Supergroup currently includes gional group stratigraphy to the early Meso- tire column of a single basin (Hartford Group in nine stratigraphic groups, each of which ap- zoic rift basins requires revision of the stratig- the Hartford basin), and one group encompasses plies to part or all of the rock column of only raphy of several basins to make formation only part of the sequence in three basins (Bruns- one or a few basins. Because the group nomen- boundaries match group boundaries. wick Group in the Newark basin; Meriden Group clature within the Newark Supergroup is nei- in the Pomperaug and Hartford basins). In other ther inclusive nor parallel in its concepts, INTRODUCTION early Mesozoic basins, no groups have been pro- nearly half of the strata within the Newark Su- posed (Scottsburg, Randolph, Roanoke Creek, pergroup lacks any group placement. A new The Newark Supergroup (Fig. 1) is an inclu- Briery Creek, Farmville, Taylorsville, Scottsville, system is proposed herein that (1) establishes sive stratigraphic term for all continental sedi- Gettysburg, Cherry Brook, Deerfield, Northfield, unambiguous group boundaries, (2) places all mentary and extrusive volcanic rocks of Middle and Middleton basins). Thus some groups corre- Newark Supergroup strata into groups, (3) re- Triassic through Early Jurassic age that are pre- spond to one basin, some groups are present in duces the number of group names from nine to served in 29 rift basins exposed in eastern North more than one basin, some groups include only three, (4) creates parallelism between groups America (Olsen, 1978; Froelich and Olsen, part of one basin, and some basins have no group and three major successive tectonic events that 1984). Age-equivalent rocks lie buried beneath assignment. created the rift basins containing the Newark the Atlantic Coastal Plain, but these have not This approach to the group concept has unnec- Supergroup, and (5) coincidentally provides been added to the Newark Supergroup because essarily fragmented a relatively uniform regional isochronous or nearly isochronous group their age, areal extent, and lithologic composition lithostratigraphic and tectonostratigraphic pat- boundaries. These proposed groups are (1) the remain unknown (Luttrell, 1989, p. 2). The New- tern, because the depositional history of the entire Chatham Group (Middle Triassic to basal ark Supergroup is bounded by profound regional Newark Supergroup can be divided into three Lower Jurassic sedimentary rocks), (2) the unconformities, each representing 90 m.y. or discrete and successive phases. In the first phase, Meriden Group (Lower Jurassic extrusive vol- more. Although local internal unconformities separate basins formed and clay, silt, sand, and canic and sedimentary rocks), and (3) the Aga- have been documented, the Newark Supergroup gravel were deposited in fluvial, lacustrine, and wam Group (new name) (Lower Jurassic sedi- regionally represents nearly continuous deposi- alluvial fan environments. This phase persisted mentary rocks above all early Mesozoic tion from Middle Triassic into Early Jurassic time about 35 m.y., from the Middle Triassic to the be- igneous intrusive and extrusive rocks). (Olsen, 1986). ginning of the Jurassic (Olsen, 1986). A second This new rock classification system makes Formational nomenclature within the Newark depositional phase occurred within the Early use of the fact that a discrete interval of syn- Supergroup generally is adequate (Luttrell, 1989, Jurassic, when large volumes of basaltic magma chronous or nearly synchronous volcanism Plate 1), but group-level stratigraphy remains dis- spread as basalt flows across the basin floors. and plutonism occurred throughout the early organized and incompletely applied (Fig. 2). These flows are interbedded with sedimentary Mesozoic rift system of eastern North Amer- Four group names (Conewago, Lewisburg or rocks, formed from continental sediments that ica. The presence or absence of volcanic rocks Lewisberry, Lisbon or Lisburn, and Manchester) continued to accumulate between basaltic erup- provides a powerful stratigraphic tool for es- have been proposed and subsequently abandoned tions. On the basis of analysis of Milankovitch- tablishing regional groups and group bound- (Luttrell, 1989); these are not discussed further. type cycles, volcanic extrusions began synchro- aries. The presence of sedimentary rocks in- Among groups currently accepted in the litera- nously within 21 k.y., ended synchronously, and jected by diabase dikes and sills, in the absence ture, two groups occur within one basin (Tucka- lasted for 580 ± 100 k.y. (Olsen and Fedosh, of extrusive volcanic rocks, places Newark Su- hoe and Chesterfield Groups in the Richmond 1988; Olsen et al., 1996). The third phase com- pergroup rocks in the Chatham Group. The basin); one group encompasses the entire column menced after volcanism ceased and sedimenta- presence of extrusive volcanic rocks, interbed- in several basins (Chatham Group in the Crow- tion resumed without volcanic interruption in at ded with sedimentary rocks injected by dia- burg, Wadesboro, Ellerbe, Sanford, and Durham least two of the rift valleys. base dikes and sills, places Newark Super- basins; Dan River Group in the Davie County Wherever the middle stage of the Newark Su- group rocks in the Meriden Group. The and Dan River–Danville basins; Tuckahoe Group pergroup rock column is fully preserved, the in- presence of sedimentary rocks lacking both ex- in the Deep Run and Flat Branch basins; Cul- terval of basaltic magmatism is represented by trusive volcanic rocks and diabase dikes and peper Group in the Barboursville and Culpeper three successive stratigraphic suites of multiple GSA Bulletin; February 1997; v. 109; no. 2; p. 195–209; 9 figures. 195 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/109/2/195/3382633/i0016-7606-109-2-195.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 WEEMS AND OLSEN Figure 1. Areal distribution of the Newark Supergroup in eastern North America. Basins in which the Newark Supergroup is preserved are listed by numbers (from Lut- trell, 1989). tholeiitic lava flows. Extensive local and regional and Olsen, 1985; Traverse, 1986; Litwin et al., unstudied. Tollo and Gottfried (1992) defined mapping throughout the early Mesozoic rift ba- 1991). Although Early Jurassic diabase dikes and three volcanic intervals, each with a distinctive sins has revealed no evidence for any extrusive sills are common in the southerly and easterly rift chemistry probably derived from a separate volcanic rocks below this interval or above it. basins, any flows formerly associated with them magma source. The lowest suite of flows (vol- Thus flow units are found in the northerly and have been removed by erosion. canic interval I), which includes the correlative westerly early Mesozoic rift basins that still con- The geochemistry and petrology of the lava Mount Zion Church, Aspers (named below), Or- tain Jurassic rocks (Culpeper, Gettysburg, New- flows have been extensively studied in the ange Mountain, Talcott, and North Mountain ark, Pomperaug, Hartford, Deerfield, and Fundy), Culpeper, Gettysburg, Newark, Hartford, Deer- Basalts (Fig. 3), consists of very similar high-ti- and none are found in the southerly and easterly field, and Fundy basins (Smith et al., 1975; Puffer tanium quartz-normative (HTQ) basalts (Puffer basins where extensive palynological studies et al., 1981; Philpotts and Reichenbach, 1985; et al., 1981; Tollo and Gottfried, 1992). The sec- show that all preserved strata are Triassic in age Tollo, 1988; Dostal and Greenough, 1992; Ho- ond suite of flows (volcanic interval II), which in- (Dunay and Fisher, 1974; Cornet, 1977; Schaeffer zik, 1992; Puffer, 1992; Tollo and Gottfried, cludes the correlative Sander, Preakness, Holy- and McDonald, 1978; Olsen et al., 1982; Cornet 1992). The flows in the Pomperaug basin remain oke, and Deerfield Basalts and the slightly older 196 Geological Society of America Bulletin, February 1997 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/109/2/195/3382633/i0016-7606-109-2-195.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 NEWARK SUPERGROUP, EASTERN NORTH AMERICA Figure 2. Currently accepted group nomenclature for the Newark Supergroup. Unnumbered portions of stratigraphic columns are not placed in any group. 1—Chatham Group, 2—Dan River Group, 3—Tuckahoe Group, 4—Chesterfield Group, 5—Culpeper Group, 6—Brunswick Group, 7—Meri- den Group, 8—Hartford Group, 9—Fundy Group. Data compiled from Luttrell (1989) except as follows: Hartford Group from Lorenz (1988) and Hu- bert et al. (1992). Jurassic stage assignments based on work by Padian (1989). Work by Litwin and Weems (1992) and Litwin and Ash (1993) take the columns of the Wadesboro, Sanford, Durham, Dan River, and Taylorsville basins well into the Norian; the top of the Richmond basin column is raised to match correlative Taylorsville basin strata. Position of the columns for the Scottsburg, Randolph, Roanoke Creek, Briery Creek, Farmville, and Scottsville basins are based partly on work by Robbins (1985) in the Farmville basin, Olsen (cited in Schaeffer and McDonald, 1978), and on extensive fieldwork by Weems. The base of the Barboursville and Culpeper columns are raised because no direct evidence exists for Carnian strata; the top of the Culpeper column is lowered on the basis of evidence discussed in text. Unconformity at the Norian-Hettangian boundary for the Deerfield basin is based on work by J. P. Smoot, mentioned in text. The top of the Pomperaug and Deerfield columns are lowered on the basis of the work of Huber and Mc- Donald (1992) and evidence discussed in text. Location of column of the Middleton basin is based on similarity with basal rock types in nearby basins.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Triassic- Jurassic Stratigraphy Of
    Triassic- Jurassic Stratigraphy of the <JF C7 JL / Culpfeper and B arbour sville Basins, VirginiaC7 and Maryland/ ll.S. PAPER Triassic-Jurassic Stratigraphy of the Culpeper and Barboursville Basins, Virginia and Maryland By K.Y. LEE and AJ. FROELICH U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1472 A clarification of the Triassic--Jurassic stratigraphic sequences, sedimentation, and depositional environments UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Lee, K.Y. Triassic-Jurassic stratigraphy of the Culpeper and Barboursville basins, Virginia and Maryland. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1472) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.16:1472 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Triassic. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic Jurassic. 3. Geology Culpeper Basin (Va. and Md.) 4. Geology Virginia Barboursville Basin. I. Froelich, A.J. (Albert Joseph), 1929- II. Title. III. Series. QE676.L44 1989 551.7'62'09755 87-600318 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract.......................................................................................................... 1 Stratigraphy Continued Introduction... ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Dinosaur Track from New Jersey at the State Museum in Trenton
    New Jersey Geological and Water Survey Information Circular What's in a Rock? A Dinosaur Track from New Jersey at the State Museum in Trenton Introduction a large dinosaur track (fig. 2) on the bottom. Most of the rock is sedimentary, sandstone from the 15,000-foot-thick Passaic A large, red rock in front of the New Jersey State Museum Formation. The bottom part is igneous, lava from the 525-foot- (NJSM) in Trenton (fig. 1) is more than just a rock. It has a thick Orange Mountain Basalt, which overspread the Passaic fascinating geological history. This three-ton slab, was excavated Formation. (The overspreading lava was originally at the top of from a construction site in Woodland Park, Passaic County. It the rock, but the rock is displayed upside down to showcase the was brought to Trenton in 2010 and placed upside down to show dinosaur footprint). The rock is about 200 million years old, from the Triassic footprints Period of geologic time. It formed in a rift valley, the Newark Passaic Formation Basin, when Africa, positioned adjacent to the mid-Atlantic states, began to pull eastward and North America began to pull westward contact to open the Atlantic Ocean. The pulling and stretching caused faults to move and the rift valley to subside along border faults including the Ramapo Fault of northeastern New Jersey, about 8 miles west of Woodland Park. Sediments from erosion of higher Collection site Orange Mountain Basalt top N Figure 1. Rock at the New Jersey State Museum. Photo by W. Kuehne Adhesion ripples DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS 0 1 2 mi Orange Mountain Basalt L 32 cm Jo (Lower Jurassic) 0 1 2 km W 25.4 cm contour interval 20 feet ^p Passaic Formation (Upper Triassic) Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Brunswick Group and Lockatong Formation, Pennsylvania
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2000 Fractured-Aquifer Hydrogeology from Geophysical Logs: Brunswick Group and Lockatong Formation, Pennsylvania Roger H. Morin Denver Federal Center, [email protected] Lisa A. Senior U.S. Geological Survey, Malvern Edward R. Decker University of Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Morin, Roger H.; Senior, Lisa A.; and Decker, Edward R., "Fractured-Aquifer Hydrogeology from Geophysical Logs: Brunswick Group and Lockatong Formation, Pennsylvania" (2000). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 352. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/352 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Fractured-Aquifer Hydrogeology from Geophysical Logs: Brunswick Group and Lockatong Formation, Pennsylvania 3 b c by Roger H. Morin , Lisa A. Senior , and Edward R. Decker Abstract The Brunswick Group and the underlying Lockatong Formation are composed of lithified Mesozoic sediments that consti­ tute part of the Newark Basin in southeastern Pennsylvania. These fractured rocks form an important regional aquifer that con­ sists of gradational sequences of shale, siltstone, and sandstone, with fluid transport occurring primarily in fractures. An exten­ sive suite of geophysical logs was obtained in seven wells located at the borough of Lansdale, Pennsylvania, in order to better characterize the areal hydrogeologic system and provide guidelines for the refinement of numerical ground water models.
    [Show full text]
  • Triassic and Jurassic Formations of the Newark Basin
    TRIASSIC AND JURASSIC FORMATIONS OF THE NEWARK BASIN PAUL E. OLSEN Bingham Laboratories, Department of Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut Abstract Newark Supergroup deposits of the Newark Basin 1946), makes this deposit ideal for studying time-facies (New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania) are divided relationships and evolutionary phenomena. These into nine formations called (from bottom up): Stockton recent discoveries have focused new interest on Newark Formation (maximum 1800 m); Lockatong Formation strata. (maximum 1150 m); Passaic Formation (maximum 6000 m); Orange Mountain Basalt (maximum 200 m); The Newark Basin (Fig. 1 and 2) is the largest of the Feltville Formation (maximum 600 m); Preakness exposed divisions of the Newark Supergroup, covering Basalt (maximum + 300 m); Towaco Formation (max- about 7770 km2 and stretching 220 km along its long imum 340 m); Hook Mountain Basalt (maximum 110 axis. The basin contains the thickest sedimentary se- m); and Boonton Formation (maximum + 500 m). Each quence of any exposed Newark Supergroup basin and formation is characterized by its own suite of rock correspondingly covers the greatest continuous amount - types, the differences being especially obvious in the of time. Thus, the Newark Basin occupies a central posi- number, thickness, and nature of their gray and black tion in the study of the Newark Supergroup as a whole. sedimentary cycles (or lack thereof). In well over a century of study the strata of Newark Fossils are abundant in the sedimentary formations of Basin have received a relatively large amount of atten- the Newark Basin and provide a means of correlating tion. By 1840, the basic map relations were worked out the sequence with other early Mesozoic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • X-Ray Computed Tomographic Reconstruction and Bone
    X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC RECONSTRUCTION AND BONE HISTOLOGY OF THE AETOSAUR COAHOMASUCHUS CHATHAMENSIS (ARCHOSAURIA: STAGONOLEPIDIDAE) FROM THE UPPER TRIASSIC PEKIN FORMATION, DEEP RIVER BASIN, NORTH CAROLINA AND A RE-ANALYSIS OF ITS PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS by Devin Kane Fodor Hoffman Honors Thesis Appalachian State University Submitted to the Department of Geology and The Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science May, 2017 Approved by: ______________________________________________________ Andrew B. Heckert, Ph.D., Thesis Director ______________________________________________________ Michael S. Osbourn, Ph.D., Second Reader ______________________________________________________ Gabriele M. Casale, Ph.D., Departmental Honors Director ______________________________________________________ Ted Zerucha, Ph.D., Interim Director, The Honors College 2 ABSTRACT Aetosauria is a clade of heavily armored, quadrupedal archosaurian omnivores to herbivores known from Upper Triassic units from across what was the supercontinent of Pangea. Their relative abundance in many deposits, as well as the sparsity of other Triassic herbivores, indicates they were key components of Late Triassic ecosystems. However, there remains debate about the relationships within the clade, the structure of their internal skeletal anatomy, and their patterns of growth. To contribute answers to these questions I reexamined and reanalyzed a recently described species of Coahomasuchus from the Sanford sub-basin of North Carolina, C. chathamensis. My phylogenetic analysis, with updated character scorings for Coahomasuchus and several other aetosaurs, recovers Coahomasuchus in a polytomy with Aetosaurus and the Typothoracinae, in contrast with a recent analysis that recovered Coahomasuchus as highly labile. In an attempt to better understand the interior skeleton of an aetosaur, I undertook the first CT reconstruction of the skeleton under the armor of an articulated specimen.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Late Triassic
    Chapter 13 Flora of the Late Triassic Evelyn Kustatscher, Sidney R. Ash, Eugeny Karasev, Christian Pott, Vivi Vajda, Jianxin Yu, and Stephen McLoughlin Abstract The Triassic was a time of diversification of the global floras following the mass-extinction event at the close of the Permian, with floras of low-diversity and somewhat uniform aspect in the Early Triassic developing into complex vegetation by the Late Triassic. The Earth experienced generally hothouse conditions with low equator-to-pole temperature gradients through the Late Triassic. This was also the time of peak amalgamation of the continents to form Pangea. Consequently, many plant families and genera were widely distributed in the Late Triassic. Nevertheless, E. Kustatscher (*) Museum of Nature South Tyrol, Bindergasse 1, 39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy Department für Geo– und Umweltwissenschaften, Paläontologie und Geobiologie, Ludwig– Maximilians–Universität, and Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Richard–Wagner–Straße 10, 80333 Munich, Germany e-mail: [email protected] S.R. Ash Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northrop Hall, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA e-mail: [email protected] E. Karasev Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow 117647, Russia e-mail: [email protected] C. Pott Palaeobiology Department, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden LWL-Museum of Natural History, Westphalian State Museum and Planetarium, Sentruper Straße 285, 48161 Münster, Germany e-mail: [email protected] V. Vajda • S. McLoughlin Palaeobiology Department, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] J.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Field Guide!
    Department of Geology 2012 Field Trip Group Leader: Prof. Alan J. Kaufman 301-760-0267 (cell) 301-405-0395 (office) Saturday, August 25, 2012 1) Leave College Park at 8 a.m. from behind the Geology Building 2) Drive to Owen Mills, MD north of Baltimore to observe the Baltimore Mafic Complex at Soldier’s Delight (~40 miles) 3) Drive to Gettysburg, PA to observe the Newark Supergroup from Little Round Top (62 miles) 4) Drive to Kistler, PA to observe the Marcellus Shale (68 miles) 5) Drive to Clear Spring, MD for the cookout and overnight at Camp Singewald (64 miles) Sunday, August 26, 2012 6) Drive to Sideling Hill, MD to observe the Tonoloway Formation and Keyser Limestone (28 miles) 7) Drive to High View, WV to observe the Needmore Formation and to collect fossils (42 miles) 8) Return to College Park and the University of Maryland Geology Building (103 miles) 1 Stop 1. Soldiers Delight Assoc. Prof. Sarah Penniston-Dorland Soldiers Delight Natural Environment Area 5100 Deer Park Road Owings Mills MD 21117 GPS 39.40944 76.83537 The rocks of this region form an assemblage of upper greenschist to lower amphibolite facies metasedimentary rocks with intercalated mafic and ultramafic rocks. These rocks are part of the Liberty Complex. At this stop we will have a brief look at some of the metamorphosed peridotites (now serpentinites) near Soldiers Delight. The ultramafic (and nearby mafic) rocks likely represent a small proportion of oceanic lithosphere (Iapetus) caught up in the Taconic accretionary event. The peridotites, now serpentinites, likely originated as mantle rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Newark Supergroup of Eastern North America
    Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Newark Supergroup of Eastern North America U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1572 Stratigraphic Nomenclature of the Newark Supergroup of Eastern North America By GWENDOLYN W. LUTTRELL U. S. G E 0 L 0 G I C A L S U R V E Y B U L L E T I N 1 5 7 2 A lexicon and correlation chart of Newark Supergroup stratigraphic nomenclature, including a review of the origin and characteristics of the early Mesozoic basins of eastern North America UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Luttrell, Gwendolyn Lewise Werth, 1927- Stratigraphic nomenclature of the Newark Supergroup of eastern North America. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1572) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:1572 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Triassic-Nomenclature. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic-Jurassic-Nomenclature. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic­ Nomenclature-North America. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1572 [QE676] 557.3 s 88-600291 [551. 7'6'097] For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................ 1 Exposed Basins . 2 Descriptions of the Exposed Basins . 6 Deep River Basin . 6 Crow burg Basin . 7 Wadesboro Basin . 8 Ellerbe Basin . 8 Sanford Basin .
    [Show full text]
  • Late Triassic Part of Newark Supergroup, Delaware River Section, West ~Central New Jersey
    LATE TRIASSIC PART OF NEWARK SUPERGROUP, DELAWARE RIVER SECTION, WEST ~CENTRAL NEW JERSEY F.B. VAN HOUTEN Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey Introduction . The Late Triassic part of the Newark Supergroup ex­ The Newark Supergroup ranges in age from Karnian posed along the Delaware Valley (Van Houten, 1969) (Late Triassic, 215 my) to late Liassic (about 180 my), consists of as much as 6 km of nonmarine sedimentary with Liassic sedimentation beginning about 100 m rocks and an associated silL Its strike generally parallels below the 1st Watchung basaltic lava flow in the middle the northeasterly trend of the basin with a dip of of the Brunswick Formation (Cornet and Traverse, 10-20oNW. Alon~ the northwestern mar~in the se~ 1975; Olsen and others, 1980; Olsen, this guidebook). quence is bounded by Precambrian and Paleozoic rocks Along the terrane of extension in eastern North America of the Reading Prong of the New England Upland. basin development and igneous activity apparently Most of this boundary is a system of high~angle faults peaked about 190 my ago. In the Delaware River section (see Ratcliffe, this guidebook), but intermittently the Triassic~Liassic boundary presumably is above the Newark border conglomerate overlaps on rocks of the preserved Brunswick strata. upland terrane. Within the basin and along its southeastern margin Newark strata lie on Paleozoic and Source Area Precambrian rocks of the Blue Ridge and Piedmont provinces. Soda-rich crystalline rocks in the faulted eastern and southeastern Piedmont upland were the source of most In the northeast (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The "Age of Dinosaurs" in the Newark Basin, with Special Reference to the Lower Hudson Valley
    2001 New York State Geological Association Guidebook The "Age of Dinosaurs" in the Newark Basin, with Special Reference to the Lower Hudson Valley Paul E. Olsen and Emma C. Rainforth Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Palisades, NY ABSTRACT This field guide is intended as an introduction to the rich stratigraphic and paleontological record of the Triassic-Jurassic Newark rift basin, especially in the vicinity of the present and ancestral routes of the lower Hudson River. We will visit seven stops that illustrate this region's range of sedimentary and igneous environments and paleobiological assemblages, focusing on their significance to the understanding of global events in the early Mesozoic, in particular the beginning of the "Age of Dinosaurs". INTRODUCTION The Newark basin (Figure 1) is one in a remarkable series of early Mesozoic rift basins that extend from Greenland to Europe, Morocco and eastern North America, and to the Gulf of Mexico, comprising the largest known rift system. This massive set of basins - the central Atlantic margin rifts - formed during the crustal extension that led to the fragmentation of Pangea (Figure 1). The Newark basin is one of the largest segments of the outcropping, deeply eroded North American contingent of these rifts, the basin fill of which is collectively termed the Newark Supergroup (Figure 1). Continental rifting seems to have begun in eastern North America sometime in the median Permian and finished in the Early Jurassic, although the exact timing of the termination of rifting is poorly constrained. These rifts - in particular the Newark basin - also record a major tectonic paroxysm that punctuated the beginning of the Jurassic: the emplacement of basaltic intrusions and extrusions of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) (Marzoli, 1999; Olsen, 1999) - the largest known igneous province (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • B5-1 Causes and Consequences of the Triassic-Jurassic Mass Extinction As
    B5-1 CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE TRIASSIC-JURASSIC MASS EXTINCTION AS SEEN FROM THE HARTFORD BASIN by Paul E. Olsen and Jessica H. Whiteside, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964 Philip Huber, PO Box 1036, Faribault, MN 55021 INTRODUCTION One of the most severe mass extinctions of the Phanerozoic, the Triassic-Jurassic event is greater or equal in magnitude to that at the more famous K-T boundary (Benton, 1994) (Fig. 1). Such severity, at least for marine families is also supported by Foote’s (2003) statistical revaluations, although there remain dissenters (e.g. Hallam, 2002; Lucas et al., 2002). The cause of this mass-extinction remains hotly debated; explanations include sea-level change (Hallam, 1990), a methane- and CO2- generated super-greenhouse triggered by flood basalt eruptions (McElwain et al., 1999; Hesselbo et al., 2002), and bolide impacts (Olsen et al., 1987). During the Triassic, all major extant groups of terrestrial vertebrates evolved, including dinosaurs (whose descendants survive as birds) and mammals. The Triassic-Jurassic mass extinction may have cleared ecological space for the rise of dinosaur dominance much as the K-T mass extinction prepared the way for mammalian ecological ascent (Olsen et al., 2003a). In this guidebook, we will examine outcrops, exposures, cores, and fossils that provide important new clues about the major features of the Triassic-Jurassic boundary and subsequent events in the Hartford basin, a rich source for data on continental ecosystems during this evolutionary transition. We will focus not just on the physical and biological record of the boundary, but on the post-boundary events, especially those recorded within and above the basin’s extrusive zone which may have been characterized by a super-greenhouse environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Anchisaurus from Springfield Armory
    Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Fossil Resources Bngham Young University Geology Studies Kemmerer,WY.Apnl2011 Volume 49(A):7S-S2. 2011 ARTICLE ANCHISAURUS FROM SPRINGFIELD ARMORY JUSTIN S. TWEET1 and VINCENT L. SANTUCCI2 'Tweet Paleo-Consulting. 9149 79th St. S.. Cottage Grove. Minnesota [email protected] 2National Park Service. Geologic Resources Division. 1201 Eye Street. NW. Washington, D.C. 20005. vincent_santucci'3;nps.gov ABSTRACT—The term "dinosaur" was only 13 years old in 1855 when blasting operations at the Water Shops of Springfield Armory in Massachusetts uncovered the partial fossil skeleton of an extinct reptile. Paleontological discoveries were not new to the area: the Connecticut River Valley, which includes the Armory, was an early hotbed of vertebrate paleontology thanks to the combination of Late Triassic-Early Jurassic-age footprints and interested naturalists. The Armory specimen, now the holotype ofAnchisauruspolyzelus, has passed through several generic names and been classified with theropods. prosauropods. and sau- ropods. Views on its paleobiology have changed from an active carnivore, to an herbivore, to an omnivore. Along the way. it has been discussed in print by numerous well-known figures in paleontology. The holotype of A. poly:elus is one of a handful of tetrapod body fossils from the Hartford Basin. As part of the history of Spring- field Armory National Historic Site, it is also one of many historically and scientifically significant fossil specimens associated with National Park System areas. KEYWORDS—Anchisaurus. Springfield Armory National Historic Site. Portland Formation. Hartford Basin. History of Paleon- tology INTRODUCTION The Springfield Armory complex is located in the Connecti- cut River Valley just east of the Connecticut River in the Hart- Although today Western states are better known for hav- ford Basin, an early Mesozoic-age structural feature (Fig.
    [Show full text]