Whither the Evolution of Human Growth and Development?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whither the Evolution of Human Growth and Development? 246 Evolutionary Anthropology BOOK REVIEWS umes, as well as what one finds in the simple idea that changes in the rate Whither the journals, falls within four major cate- and/or timing of specific developmen- gories, none of which is entirely inde- tal processes can cause many pheno- Evolution of Human pendent. First are studies of hetero- typic changes. Heterochrony has been chrony, how changes in the rate and both a boon and a curse ever since it Growth and timing of developmental processes was revived because it is so easily op- lead to evolutionary change. Hetero- erationalized and because it potentially Development? chrony research has a long history in explains how simple mechanisms can paleoanthropology. As is evident from account for large evolutionary shifts. Development, Growth and Evolution: Human Evolution through Develop- According to this framework, descen- Implications for the Study of the mental Change, which is mostly de- dants can differ from their ancestors by Hominid Skeleton Edited by P O’Higgins and M Cohn, voted to this subject, enthusiasm for altering the rate at which specific fea- (2000) Academic Press. 271 p. $79.95 studying heterochrony shows little tures grow, the length of time that they (cloth). ISBN 0-12-524965-9. sign of abating. Second, there has grow, or both. For example, many dif- been a recent interest in heterotopy, ferences cranial shape between humans Human Evolution through the study of evolutionary changes in and chimpanzees arise during ontog- Developmental Change spatial patterning. Heterotopy offers eny because the human brain grows Edited by N Minugh-Purvis and KJ McNamara (Eds) (2002) The Johns an interesting and important alterna- more rapidly and for longer than does Hopkins University Press. 508 p. $59.95 tive to heterochrony, but has barely the chimpanzee brain. Such cases of (cloth). ISBN 0-8018-6372-0. been considered in studies of human more development of a particular fea- evolution. Zelditch’s Beyond Hetero- ture during ontogeny in a descendant Beyond Heterochrony: The Evolution chrony includes many papers that test than in an ancestor are termed per- of Development heterotopy hypotheses, but none even amorphosis (or hypermorphosis). The Edited by ML Zelditch (ed) (2001) Wiley-Liss. 371 p. $99.95. ISBN 0-471- mentions human evolution, let alone opposite pattern, less development dur- 37973-5. primates. Third, and most prominent ing ontogeny in a descendant than in an of late, is evolutionary-developmental ancestor, is termed pedomorphosis (or These three recent volumes offer an biology, often called “evo-devo,” hypomorphosis). Peramorphosis and opportunity to evaluate current re- which is a partial focus of O’Higgins pedomorphosis are divided into further search in this field, especially in rela- and Cohn’s Development, Growth and subcategories, the most famous of tion to human evolution. After years Evolution. Evo-devo defies a simple which is neoteny, a type of pedomor- in which comparisons of adult skele- definition, but mostly concerns the phosis in which the juvenile form of an tal morphology dominated most re- study of the genetic bases for pheno- ancestor is retained in the adult stage of search on hominid systematics and typic shifts. Evo-devo is one of the the descendant. functional morphology, more and fastest growing and most prominent There is no question that hetero- more paleoanthropologists are turn- new fields of biology, largely because chrony is a powerful and often elegant ing to the study of growth and devel- of successes in explaining the regula- way of testing hypotheses about evo- opment to test their hypotheses. A tory bases for the origin of new body lutionary change. Human Evolution large proportion, though not all of this plans (bauplane). It is not surprising through Developmental Change con- research, is driven by the logic that that a number of researchers have at- tains excellent reviews of the assump- phenotypic shifts occur through alter- tempted to apply evo-devo studies tions and mathematical bases that un- ations of processes of growth and de- and, on occasion, approaches to phe- derlie heterochony analyses by D. velopment. It follows that to test hy- notypic shifts in human evolution. Fi- Alba, G. Eble, R. German and S. Stew- potheses about the nature and causes nally, a few researchers, myself in- art, B.K. Hall, K. McNamara, S. Rice, of evolutionary events it is necessary cluded, have been focusing on what and B. Shea. There are also a few good to test hypotheses about the shifts in one might call intermediate mecha- case studies (all of which have been processes of growth and development nistic processes, which lie somewhere published elsewhere in more detail). that generate novel phenotypes. Put between genetic studies and analyses Perhaps the most interesting is Mc- simply, the goal is to understand the of heterochrony. These approaches, Kinney’s work on the evolution of the processes that underlie the patterns along with papers on methodological brain. McKinney argues that the hu- we observe. issues, are also represented in Devel- man brain, as compared to that of The research presented in these vol- opment, Growth and Evolution. apes, evolved through two major per- So how are we doing? Let us start amorphotic changes. First, more cells with heterochrony, first formulated are allotted to the human brain early explicitly by Haeckel in 1866, and re- in development. Second, human vived almost single-handedly by the growth is characterized by a series of Evolutionary Anthropology 11:246–248 (2002) late Steven Jay Gould’s landmark sequential delays (called sequential DOI 10.1002/evan.10037 1 Published online in Wiley InterScience book, Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Het- hypermorphosis) in general somatic (www.interscience.wiley.com). erochrony analyses are based on the and neural mitosis. These delays gen- BOOK REVIEWS Evolutionary Anthropology 247 other taxa. Fascinating examples are presented in many chapters in the Zelditch volume, including those by Webster and coworkers, Zelditch and colleagues, Guralnik and Kurpius, Roopnarine, and Shapiro and Carl. These and other studies show that het- erotypy is also an important engine of change, even among such closely re- lated species as piranha fish. It will be fun to see such analyses extended more broadly to problems in human evolution, such as the chin. Chins de- Figure 1. Two examples of different ontogenetic vectors in shape space expected between velop, in part, from resorption fields ancestor (black) and descendant species. Left, paedomorphosis (hypomorphosis) versus on the upper alveolar surface of the paeramorphosis (hypermorphosis); Right, heterotopy. mandibular symphysis.3,4 Nonhuman primates lack this growth field, mak- erate longer durations of all develop- is the thorny problem of homology. ing the chin an excellent candidate for mental stages, a larger brain, and a Heterochrony analyses often homolo- heterotopy. larger body mass. In other words, a gize ontogenetic stages, but this can Another especially important devel- few ontogenetically early shifts that be theoretically or methodologically opment, and one that is of major inter- alter many aspects of phenotype and problematic, as is evident from analy- est to many biological anthropologists, life history can explain in one fell ses of the age of fossils such as Nari- is the application of three-dimensional swoop many of the differences be- okotome.2 Heterochrony studies also landmark coordinate data and geomet- tween humans (big-brained, big-bod- require the assumption that the mor- ric morphometrics to test alternative ied, and slow-growing) and both phological features one measures are hypotheses of evolutionary change. In chimpanzees and australopithecines homologous, independent units. This (small-brained, small-bodied, and fast assumption has bedeviled many stud- Development, Growth and Evolution, growing). Other interesting reviews of ies, which have failed to dissociate chapters by Spoor and colleagues and the application of heterochrony to hu- heterochronies between integrated re- by O’Higgins provide especially clear man evolution include chapters by C. gions. As Shea points out in Human and useful reviews of three-dimen- Berge and by L’Engle Williams and Evolution through Developmental sional imaging technology and the use colleagues. Change, studies of whether the human of three-dimensional data in geometric The advantages of heterochrony as a skull is globally neotenous are point- morphometrics. While geometric mor- methodology are also potential weak- less because the human skull com- phometric analyses of three-dimen- nesses. Heterochrony research is easy prises several regions that probably sional data are becoming increasingly to do, and if one accepts its assump- have quite different heterochronies. prevalent in the study of human evolu- tions uncritically, then one can always Our brains are obviously peramor- tion, they are not always used in the do analyses that yield results that are photic, but our faces may well be pe- context of explicit hypotheses about interpretable within a heterochrony domorphotic. A consequence of this growth and development. Yet, as Figure framework. All one needs to do is phenomenon is that analyses of inte- 1 shows, ontogenetic vectors from rela- measure some features in individuals grated morphologies can unwittingly tive warp analyses may be used to dis- of ancestor and descendant species of conflate dissociated heterochronies tinguish between heterotopy and het- different ages. (It is best if one knows as, for example, Lieberman shows for erochrony, and even to distinguish the real age and can avoid using size the brow ridge in Development, between some, but not all, of the sub- as a proxy for age). With a little data Growth and Evolution. categories of heterochrony. Applying entry and a smattering of computer A final problem is that while hetero- such a framework to recent geometric time, one can quickly calculate regres- chrony is clearly common, not all evo- morphometric studies in human evo- sion lines for two or more species hav- lutionary change is heterochronic.
Recommended publications
  • Transformations of Lamarckism Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology Gerd B
    Transformations of Lamarckism Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology Gerd B. M ü ller, G ü nter P. Wagner, and Werner Callebaut, editors The Evolution of Cognition , edited by Cecilia Heyes and Ludwig Huber, 2000 Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Development and Evolutionary Biology , edited by Gerd B. M ü ller and Stuart A. Newman, 2003 Environment, Development, and Evolution: Toward a Synthesis , edited by Brian K. Hall, Roy D. Pearson, and Gerd B. M ü ller, 2004 Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach , edited by D. Kimbrough Oller and Ulrike Griebel, 2004 Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems , edited by Werner Callebaut and Diego Rasskin-Gutman, 2005 Compositional Evolution: The Impact of Sex, Symbiosis, and Modularity on the Gradualist Framework of Evolution , by Richard A. Watson, 2006 Biological Emergences: Evolution by Natural Experiment , by Robert G. B. Reid, 2007 Modeling Biology: Structure, Behaviors, Evolution , edited by Manfred D. Laubichler and Gerd B. M ü ller, 2007 Evolution of Communicative Flexibility: Complexity, Creativity, and Adaptability in Human and Animal Communication , edited by Kimbrough D. Oller and Ulrike Griebel, 2008 Functions in Biological and Artifi cial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives , edited by Ulrich Krohs and Peter Kroes, 2009 Cognitive Biology: Evolutionary and Developmental Perspectives on Mind, Brain, and Behavior , edited by Luca Tommasi, Mary A. Peterson, and Lynn Nadel, 2009 Innovation in Cultural Systems: Contributions from Evolutionary Anthropology , edited by Michael J. O ’ Brien and Stephen J. Shennan, 2010 The Major Transitions in Evolution Revisited , edited by Brett Calcott and Kim Sterelny, 2011 Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology , edited by Snait B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Developmental Biology and Disease States CHAPTER 5 Teratogenesis: Environmental Assaults on Development 167
    Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine, and Evolution Scott F. Gilbert David Epel Swarthmore College Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University Sinauer Associates, Inc. • Publishers Sunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A. © Sinauer Associates, Inc. This material cannot be copied, reproduced, manufactured or disseminated in any form without express written permission from the publisher. Brief Contents PART 1 Environmental Signals and Normal Development CHAPTER 1 The Environment as a Normal Agent in Producing Phenotypes 3 CHAPTER 2 How Agents in the Environment Effect Molecular Changes in Development 37 CHAPTER 3 Developmental Symbiosis: Co-Development as a Strategy for Life 79 CHAPTER 4 Embryonic Defenses: Survival in a Hostile World 119 PART 2 Ecological Developmental Biology and Disease States CHAPTER 5 Teratogenesis: Environmental Assaults on Development 167 CHAPTER 6 Endocrine Disruptors 197 CHAPTER 7 The Epigenetic Origin of Adult Diseases 245 PART 3 Toward a Developmental Evolutionary Synthesis CHAPTER 8 The Modern Synthesis: Natural Selection of Allelic Variation 289 CHAPTER 9 Evolution through Developmental Regulatory Genes 323 CHAPTER 10 Environment, Development, and Evolution: Toward a New Synthesis 369 CODA Philosophical Concerns Raised by Ecological Developmental Biology 403 APPENDIX A Lysenko, Kammerer, and the Truncated Tradition of Ecological Developmental Biology 421 APPENDIX B The Molecular Mechanisms of Epigenetic Change 433 APPENDIX C Writing Development Out of the Modern Synthesis 441 APPENDIX D Epigenetic Inheritance Systems:
    [Show full text]
  • Etude Sur L'origine Et L'évolution Des Variations Florales Chez Delphinium L. (Ranunculaceae) À Travers La Morphologie, L'anatomie Et La Tératologie
    Etude sur l'origine et l'évolution des variations florales chez Delphinium L. (Ranunculaceae) à travers la morphologie, l'anatomie et la tératologie : 2019SACLS126 : NNT Thèse de doctorat de l'Université Paris-Saclay préparée à l'Université Paris-Sud ED n°567 : Sciences du végétal : du gène à l'écosystème (SDV) Spécialité de doctorat : Biologie Thèse présentée et soutenue à Paris, le 29/05/2019, par Felipe Espinosa Moreno Composition du Jury : Bernard Riera Chargé de Recherche, CNRS (MECADEV) Rapporteur Julien Bachelier Professeur, Freie Universität Berlin (DCPS) Rapporteur Catherine Damerval Directrice de Recherche, CNRS (Génétique Quantitative et Evolution Le Moulon) Présidente Dario De Franceschi Maître de Conférences, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (CR2P) Examinateur Sophie Nadot Professeure, Université Paris-Sud (ESE) Directrice de thèse Florian Jabbour Maître de conférences, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (ISYEB) Invité Etude sur l'origine et l'évolution des variations florales chez Delphinium L. (Ranunculaceae) à travers la morphologie, l'anatomie et la tératologie Remerciements Ce manuscrit présente le travail de doctorat que j'ai réalisé entre les années 2016 et 2019 au sein de l'Ecole doctorale Sciences du végétale: du gène à l'écosystème, à l'Université Paris-Saclay Paris-Sud et au Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle de Paris. Même si sa réalisation a impliqué un investissement personnel énorme, celui-ci a eu tout son sens uniquement et grâce à l'encadrement, le soutien et l'accompagnement de nombreuses personnes que je remercie de la façon la plus sincère. Je remercie très spécialement Florian Jabbour et Sophie Nadot, mes directeurs de thèse.
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity of Vertebrate Genomes: Paired-Related Homeobox (Prrx) Genes in Spotted Gar, Basal Teleosts, and Tetrapods
    Connectivity of vertebrate genomes: Paired-related homeobox (Prrx) genes in spotted gar, basal teleosts, and tetrapods. Ingo Braasch, Yann Guiguen, Ryan Loker, John H Letaw, Allyse Ferrara, Julien Bobe, John H Postlethwait To cite this version: Ingo Braasch, Yann Guiguen, Ryan Loker, John H Letaw, Allyse Ferrara, et al.. Connectivity of ver- tebrate genomes: Paired-related homeobox (Prrx) genes in spotted gar, basal teleosts, and tetrapods.. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part C: Toxicology and Pharmacology, Elsevier, 2014, 163, pp.24-36. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2014.01.005. hal-01205078 HAL Id: hal-01205078 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01205078 Submitted on 27 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Research Article Connectivity of vertebrate genomes: Paired-related homeobox (Prrx) genes in spotted gar, basal teleosts, and tetrapods Ingo Braascha, Yann Guiguenb, Ryan Lokera, John H. Letawa,1, Allyse Ferrarac, Julien Bobeb, and John H. Postlethwaita aInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403-1254, OR, USA; bINRA, UR1037 LPGP, Campus de Beaulieu, F-35000 Rennes, France; cDepartment of Biological Sciences, Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, LA 70310, USA Email addresses: Ingo Braasch: [email protected] Yann Guigen: [email protected] Ryan Loker: [email protected] John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetics and Systems Biology 1St Edition Ebook
    EPIGENETICS AND SYSTEMS BIOLOGY 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Leonie Ringrose | 9780128030769 | | | | | Epigenetics and Systems Biology 1st edition PDF Book Regulation of lipogenic gene expression by lysine-specific histone demethylase-1 LSD1. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. New technologies are also needed to study higher order chromatin organization and function. For example, acetylation of the K14 and K9 lysines of the tail of histone H3 by histone acetyltransferase enzymes HATs is generally related to transcriptional competence. The idea that multiple dynamic modifications regulate gene transcription in a systematic and reproducible way is called the histone code , although the idea that histone state can be read linearly as a digital information carrier has been largely debunked. Namespaces Article Talk. It seems existing structures act as templates for new structures. As part of its efforts, the society launched a journal, Epigenetics , in January with the goal of covering a full spectrum of epigenetic considerations—medical, nutritional, psychological, behavioral—in any organism. Sooner or later, with the advancements in biomedical tools, the detection of such biomarkers as prognostic and diagnostic tools in patients could possibly emerge out as alternative approaches. Genotype—phenotype distinction Reaction norm Gene—environment interaction Gene—environment correlation Operon Heritability Quantitative genetics Heterochrony Neoteny Heterotopy. The lysine demethylase, KDM4B, is a key molecule in androgen receptor signalling and turnover. Khan, A. Hidden categories: Webarchive template wayback links All articles lacking reliable references Articles lacking reliable references from September Wikipedia articles needing clarification from January All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June This mechanism enables differentiated cells in a multicellular organism to express only the genes that are necessary for their own activity.
    [Show full text]
  • "Evolution and Tinkering" (1977), by Francois Jacob [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) "Evolution and Tinkering" (1977), by Francois Jacob [1] By: Racine, Valerie Keywords: bricolage [2] tinkering [3] In his essay "Evolution and Tinkering," published in Science in 1977, François Jacob argues that a common analogy between the process of evolution [4] by natural selection [5] and the methods of engineering is problematic. Instead, he proposes to describe the process of evolution [4] with the concept of bricolage (tinkering). In this essay, Jacob does not deny the importance of the mechanism of natural selection [5] in shaping complex adaptations. Instead, he maintains that the cumulative effects of history on the evolution [4] of life, made evident by molecular data, provides an alternative account of the patterns depicting the history of life on earth. Jacob's essay contributed to genetic research in the late twentieth century that emphasized certain types of topics in evolutionary and developmental biology, such as genetic regulation [6], gene duplication events, and the genetic program of embryonic development. It also proposed why, in future research, biologists should expect to discover an underlying similarity in the molecular structure of genomes, and that they should expect to find many imperfections in evolutionary history despite the influence of natural selection [5]. The author of the article, François Jacob, studied enzyme expression and regulation [6] in bacteria and bacteriophages at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, France. In 1965, Jacob won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine [7] with André M. Lwoff and Jacques L. Monod for their work on the genetic control of enzyme and virus synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Homology of Process: Developmental Dynamics in Comparative Biology
    Forthcoming in Interface Focus Homology of process: developmental dynamics in comparative biology James DiFrisco1,* and Johannes Jaeger2,3 (1) Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (2) Complexity Science Hub (CSH) Vienna, Josefstädter Straße 39, 1080 Vienna, Austria (3) Department of Molecular Evolution & Development, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria Abstract: Comparative biology builds up systematic knowledge of the diversity of life, across evolutionary lineages and levels of organization, starting with evidence from a sparse sample of model organisms. In developmental biology, a key obstacle to the growth of comparative approaches is that the concept of homology is not very well defined for levels of organization that are intermediate between individual genes and morphological characters. In this paper, we investigate what it means for ontogenetic processes to be homologous, focusing specifically on the examples of insect segmentation and vertebrate somitogenesis. These processes can be homologous without homology of the underlying genes or gene networks, since the latter can diverge over evolutionary time, while the dynamics of the process remain the same. Ontogenetic processes like these therefore constitute a dissociable level and distinctive unit of comparison requiring their own specific criteria of homology. In addition, such processes are typically complex and nonlinear, such that their rigorous description and comparison not only requires observation and experimentation, but also dynamical modeling. We propose six criteria of process homology, combining recognized indicators (sameness of parts, morphological outcome, and topological position) with novel ones derived from dynamical systems modeling (sameness of dynamical properties, dynamical complexity, and evidence for transitional forms). We show how these criteria apply to animal segmentation and other ontogenetic processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecological Genomics: When Genomics Meets Marine Ecology
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 332: 257–273, 2007 Published March 5 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Marine ecological genomics: when genomics meets marine ecology Samuel Dupont*, Karen Wilson, Mathias Obst, Helen Sköld, Hiroaki Nakano, Michael C. Thorndyke Kristineberg Marine Station, 566 Kristineberg, 45034 Fiskebäckskil, Sweden ABSTRACT: Genomics, proteomics and metabolomics (the ’omic’ technologies) have revolutionized the way we work and are able to think about working, and have opened up hitherto unimagined opportunities in all research fields. In marine ecology, while ‘standard’ molecular and genetic approaches are well known, the newer technologies are taking longer to make an impact. In this review we explore the potential and promise offered by genomics, genome technologies, expressed sequence tag (EST) collections, microarrays, proteomics and bar coding for modern marine ecology. Methods are succinctly presented with both benefits and limitations discussed. Through examples from the literature, we show how these tools can be used to answer fundamental ecological questions, e.g. ‘what is the relationship between community structure and ecological function in ecosystems?’; ‘how can a species and the phylogenetic relationship between taxa be identified?’; ‘what are the fac- tors responsible for the limits of the ecological niche?’; or ‘what explains the variations in life-history patterns among species?’ The impact of ecological ideas and concepts on genomic science is also dis- cussed. KEY WORDS: Sequencing · ESTs · Microarrays · Proteomics · Barcoding Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION isms have been sequenced and analyzed since the publication of the first complete genome in 1995, and Genome-based technologies are revolutionizing our today a new organism is sequenced nearly every week understanding of biology at all levels, from genes to (Rogers & Venter 2005, Van Straalen & Roelofs 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • ETD Template
    EXPLAINING EVOLUTIONARY INNOVATION AND NOVELTY: A HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY OF BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS by Alan Christopher Love BS in Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995 MA in Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 2002 MA in Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, 2004 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History and Philosophy of Science University of Pittsburgh 2005 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Alan Christopher Love It was defended on June 22, 2005 and approved by Sandra D. Mitchell, PhD Professor of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh Robert C. Olby, PhD Professor of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh Rudolf A. Raff, PhD Professor of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington Günter P. Wagner, PhD Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University James G. Lennox, PhD Dissertation Director Professor of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh ii Copyright by Alan Christopher Love 2005 iii EXPLAINING EVOLUTIONARY INNOVATION AND NOVELTY: A HISTORICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY OF BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS Alan Christopher Love, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2005 Abstract Explaining evolutionary novelties (such as feathers or neural crest cells) is a central item on the research agenda of evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-devo). Proponents of Evo- devo have claimed that the origin of innovation and novelty constitute a distinct research problem, ignored by evolutionary theory during the latter half of the 20th century, and that Evo- devo as a synthesis of biological disciplines is in a unique position to address this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2011 Evolution and Development
    "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2011 Evolution and development ("evo-devo") The last frontier in our understanding of biological forms is an understanding of their developmental origins. Much of the ultimate control of form resides in the genome, yet much also resides in the environment (at levels from the internal cellular environment to the external habitat). The highly interactive and complex nature of developmental processes make it impractical to deduce phenotype from genotype based on first principles. We need to carefully keep in mind what we mean by "homology" as well. The phenotype is an emergent property and its origin can be studied most efficiently by backtracking from the phenotype itself to its structural, physiological, developmental, ecological, and genetic causes. Ontogeny and phylogeny revisited The relation between ontogeny and phylogeny has been of longstanding interest to biologists, and continues to be a timely topic. It is important of course to take a comparative approach to development, within a phylogenetic framework. Our aims are to reconstruct both the developmental pathway taken by a given species for a given structure, and the manner in which the developmental system evolved. Some terminology (see Humphries 1988 for details): http://www.usm.maine.edu/bio/courses/bio205/Lab_3.html Heterotopy -- evolutionary change in the position of development Heterochrony -- evolutionary change in the timing of development (see figure later) Peramorphosis (Hypermorphosis
    [Show full text]
  • Hedgehog Signaling Patterns the Oral- Aboral Axis of the Mandibular Arch
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Hedgehog signaling patterns the oral- aboral axis of the mandibular arch Jingyue Xu1, Han Liu1, Yu Lan1,2,3,4, Mike Adam1, David E Clouthier5, Steven Potter1,3, Rulang Jiang1,2,3,4* 1Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States; 2Division of Plastic Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States; 3Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States; 4Shriners Hospitals for Children – Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States; 5Department of Craniofacial Biology, School of Dental Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, United States Abstract Development of vertebrate jaws involves patterning neural crest-derived mesenchyme cells into distinct subpopulations along the proximal-distal and oral-aboral axes. Although the molecular mechanisms patterning the proximal-distal axis have been well studied, little is known regarding the mechanisms patterning the oral-aboral axis. Using unbiased single-cell RNA-seq analysis followed by in situ analysis of gene expression profiles, we show that Shh and Bmp4 signaling pathways are activated in a complementary pattern along the oral-aboral axis in mouse embryonic mandibular arch. Tissue-specific inactivation of hedgehog signaling in neural crest- derived mandibular mesenchyme led to expansion of BMP signaling activity to throughout the oral- aboral axis of the distal mandibular arch and subsequently duplication of dentary bone in the oral side of the mandible at the expense of tongue formation. Further studies indicate that hedgehog signaling acts through the Foxf1/2 transcription factors to specify the oral fate and pattern the oral-aboral axis of the mandibular mesenchyme.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics - IB 200B 8 Feb 2011
    Phylogenetics - IB 200B 8 Feb 2011 Heterochrony & Phylogenetics All members of a monophyletic taxon share a common ancestor whose developmental pathway was modified to produce descendant morphologies. Haeckel, E. 1899 - originally a physician became professor of comparative anatomy, later professor of zoology, a chair established for him at Jena. Haeckel was deeply influenced by Darwin's "Origin…", and became "the apostle of Darwinism in Germany." Also coined term "Ecology." "I established the opposite view, that this history of the embryo (ontogeny) must be completed by a second, equally valuable, and closely connected branch of thought - the history of race (phylogeny). Both of these branches of evolutionary science are, in my opinion, in the closest causal connection; this arises from the reciprocal action of the laws of heredity and adaptation... 'ontogenesis is a brief and rapid recapitulation of phylogenesis, determined by the physiological functions of heredity (generation) and adaptation (maintenance).” Rejection of recapitulationist ideas in the early part of this century, however, the study of links between development and evolution was relatively neglected until Ontogeny and Phylogeny was published by Gould in 1977. Gould presented his own ideas on heterochrony (evolutionary changes in the timing of development), presenting a unified view of neoteny, recapitulation, paedogenesis, retardation, progenesis, etc. Basic idea is that all heterochrony is a result of acceleration or retardation of different developmental processes (growth, sexual maturation, morphological changes, etc.). Heterochrony involves three kinds of evolutionary changes in the timing of development: changes in rate, changes in onset time, and changes in offset time. Each change can either be an increase or a decrease, thus six kinds of pure heterochrony can be defined: neoteny (slower rate), acceleration (faster rate), post- displacement (late onset), pre-displacement (early onset), progenesis (early offset) and hypermorphosis (late offset).
    [Show full text]