DOCSLIB.ORG

Boston Properties 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boston Properties 2014 2014 Boston Properties Annual Report BOSTON PROPERTIES BOSTON NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON, DC Corporate Headquarters Boston 800 Boylston Street at The Prudential Center Boston, MA 02199 (617) 236-3300 www.bostonproperties.com Boston BOSTON 800 Boylston Street at The Prudential Center Boston, MA 02199 PROPERTIES, (617) 236-3300 INC. New York 599 Lexington Avenue 2014 New York, NY 10022 ANNUAL (212) 326-4000 REPORT San Francisco Four Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 772-0700 Washington, DC 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20037 (202) 585-0800 46497Cover.indd 1 3/24/15 12:33 PM On the Cover Pictured top: Corporate Information 535 Mission Street, San Francisco, CA (left) Rendering of 601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC (right) Corporate Counsel Form 10-K Pictured middle: Rendering of 888 Boylston Street, Boston, MA Goodwin Procter LLP Boston Properties’ Form 10-K is incorporated herein and has been fi led with the Securities Exchange Place and Exchange Commission. Additional copies of the Annual Report and Form 10-K may be Pictured bottom: 53 State Street obtained from the Company free of charge by calling Investor Relations at (617) 236-3322; Rendering of 804 Carnegie Center, Princeton, NJ Boston, MA 02109 or by submitting a request through the Contact feature on the Company’s website at www.bostonproperties.com. Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Stock Information PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol 125 High Street “BXP.” On January 30, 2015, the closing sale price per common share on the NYSE was $138.80 Boston, MA 02110 and there were approximately 1,382 common shareholders of record. This does not include the number of persons whose shares are held in nominee or “street name” accounts through Transfer Agent and Registrar banks or brokers. The table below sets forth the quarterly high and low sales prices and distributions per common share for fi scal year 2014. Registered shareholders with questions Contents about their account or inquiries related 2014 Quarter Ended High Low Distributions to our Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan should contact: December 31 $137.15 $115.06 $5.15 1 IFC Company Description September 30 $124.04 $112.75 $0.65 Computershare Trust Company, N.A. 1-10 Letter to Shareholders June 30 $122.40 $113.62 $0.65 P.O. Box 30170 March 31 $115.20 $99.55 $0.65 11 Sustainability College Station, TX 77842 12 Board of Directors and Offi cers (888) 485-2389 1 www.computershare.com Paid on January 28, 2015 to shareholders of record on December 31, 2014. Amount includes the $4.50 per 13 Form 10-K common share special dividend. IBC Corporate Information Investor Relations Annual Meeting of Shareholders Investor inquiries may be directed to: The annual meeting of shareholders of Boston Properties, Inc. will be held on May 19, 2015 Investor Relations at 10:00 a.m. at 399 Park Avenue, 13th fl oor, New York, NY. Boston Properties About Boston Properties 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1900 Boston, MA 02199 (617) 236-3322 [email protected] Boston Properties, Inc., a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT), is one of the largest owners, managers and developers of Class A offi ce properties in the United States, with a signifi cant presence in four markets: Boston, You may also contact us through our New York, San Francisco and Washington, DC. The Company was founded in 1970 by Mortimer B. Zuckerman and Edward H. website at www.bostonproperties.com. Linde in Boston, where it maintains its headquarters. Boston Properties became a public company in June 1997 and is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BXP.” The Company acquires, develops and manages its properties through full-service regional offi ces. Its property portfolio is comprised primarily of Class A offi ce properties and also includes one hotel, three residential properties and fi ve retail properties. Boston Properties is well-known for its in-house building management expertise and responsiveness to tenants’ needs. The Company holds a superior track record in developing premium Central Business District (CBD) offi ce buildings, suburban offi ce centers and build-to-suit projects for the U.S. government and a diverse array of creditworthy tenants. Boston Properties and the logo are registered service marks of Boston Properties Limited Partnership. This Annual Report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. See the discussion under “Forward-Looking Statements” in the Form 10-K for matters to be considered in this regard. This Annual Report also contains certain non-GAAP fi nancial measures within the meaning of Regulation G. The calculations of these non-GAAP fi nancial measures may diff er from those used by other REITs. Calculations of these terms, the reasons for their use and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are either included in the Form 10-K or proxy statement. Design: Webster www.websterdesign.com 46497Cover.indd 2 3/25/15 12:15 PM Mortimer B. Zuckerman Chairman of the Board Owen D. Thomas Chief Executive Offi cer Douglas T. Linde President To Our Shareholders Boston Properties had a very strong year in 2014 and made signifi cant progress in the execution of our strategy. We achieved record levels of leasing in our combined in-service and development properties, we found new development opportunities in which to invest signifi cant additional capital and we executed on a number of exciting capital markets transactions that demonstrated the long-term value creation we have achieved through both development and acquisitions. Specifi cally, we: • added six development projects with an incremental projected development cost of $1.2 billion bringing our development • increased diluted FFO per share from $4.91 to $5.26, despite pipeline underway to $2.1 billion with a projected initial the reduction of $0.11 per share of FFO from the sale of assets, unleveraged cash yield of more than 7%, and • sold all or part of nine assets for $2.3 billion at a weighted • strengthened our balance sheet by repaying approximately average cap rate of 4.3%, $1.4 billion in company fi nancing reducing our total adjusted debt • declared total dividends of $7.10 per share, including a special to total adjusted market capitalization ratio from 38% to 29%. dividend of $4.50 per share, We were rewarded for our accomplishments in 2014 through strong • completed 7.7 million square feet of leasing, an annual record absolute and relative share price performance. Specifi cally, total for Boston Properties, in both existing and under development shareholder return in 2014 for Boston Properties was 35.5% while buildings, including securing the anchor tenant for Salesforce total returns in 2014 for the FTSE NAREIT Offi ce Index and Cohen & Tower in San Francisco, California, Steers Realty Majors Portfolio Index of large capitalization REIT were • generated 2014 same property cash NOI growth of 5.4% 25.9% and 34.6%, respectively. over 2013, Boston Properties has provided outstanding absolute and relative • delivered three development projects representing $1.5 billion shareholder returns since its IPO in 1997. Specifi cally, we have in cost at a weighted average initial projected unleveraged delivered total shareholder return of 1,082% compared to the S&P cash yield of more than 6%, 500 Index total return of 218% and FTSE NAREIT All REITs total return of 408%. 1 446497Eds6497Eds rrev.inddev.indd 1 33/25/15/25/15 111:241:24 AAMM Rendering of North Station mixed-use development, Boston, MA Strategy Total Shareholder Return Since IPO Boston Properties remains committed to our strategy, which has 1200% BXP served the company and our shareholders well through our S&P 500 Index 18-year history as a public company. Our strategy is as follows: 1000% FTSE NAREIT All REITs Index 800% • maintain a keen focus on select markets that exhibit the strongest economic growth and investment characteristics 600% over time, currently Boston, New York, San Francisco and 400% Washington, DC, 200% • invest in the highest quality buildings that are able to maintain high occupancy and achieve premium rental rates through 0% economic cycles, ’97 ’99 ’01 ’03 ’05 ’07 ’09 ’11 ’13 • in our core markets, maintain scale and a full service real estate This graph assumes an investment of $100 on June 17, 1997 and the capability (leasing, development, construction and property reinvestment of dividends. Data shown is based on the share price or index values, as applicable as of December 31 of each year shown. management) to ensure we (1) see all relevant investment deal Source: NASDAQ OMX. fl ow and (2) maintain an ability to execute on all types of real estate opportunities, such as acquisitions, dispositions, repositioning and development, throughout the real estate investment cycle, 2 46497Eds rev.indd 2 3/25/15 11:26 AM • ensure a strong balance sheet to maintain consistent access to capital and the resultant ability to make opportunistic investments, and • foster a culture and reputation of integrity and fair dealing, making us the counterparty of choice for real estate industry participants. Economy and Operating Environment The key drivers of real estate value are economic growth, translating into rent and occupancy growth, and cost of capital, translating into return expectations and valuation. In 2014, six years after the fi nancial crisis, the U.S. economy exhibited reasonable strength. GDP growth was 2.4% and the un- employment rate dropped to under 6%. Commodity markets, most importantly oil prices, have weakened markedly. However, the U.S. economy is diverging from the rest of the world, most of which is experiencing declining growth and infl ation, as well as material fi scal intervention resulting in unprecedented lower interest rates outside the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zoning for Dollars: New Rules for an Old Game? Comments on the Municipal Art Society and Nollan Cases Jerold S
    Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume 39 January 1991 Zoning for Dollars: New Rules for an Old Game? Comments on the Municipal Art Society and Nollan Cases Jerold S. Kayden Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jerold S. Kayden, Zoning for Dollars: New Rules for an Old Game? Comments on the Municipal Art Society and Nollan Cases, 39 Wash. U. J. Urb. & Contemp. L. 3 (1991) Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw/vol39/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ZONING FOR DOLLARS: NEW RULES FOR AN OLD GAME? COMMENTS ON THE MUNICIPAL AR T SOCIETY AND NOLLAN CASES Jerold S. Kayden * Faced with mounting social needs and continuing fiscal constraints, more and more cities "mint" money through their zoning codes to fi- nance a wide array of public amenities. Through the land use regula- tory technique formally known as "incentive zoning," cities grant private real estate developers the legal right to disregard zoning restric- tions in return for their voluntary agreement to provide urban design features such as plazas, atriums, and parks, and social facilities and services such as affordable housing, day care centers, and job training. Since its inception some thirty years ago,' incentive zoning has enjoyed broad support from developers and their attorneys, avoiding the legal challenges commonly brought against land use regulations requiring * A.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of Creditor Reliant Energy Services, Inc., Regarding Debtor's
    McCUTCHEN, DOYLE, BROWN & ENERSEN, LLP 1 10 -- TERRY J. HOULIHAN (SBN 42877) 2 WILLIAM BATES III (SBN 63317) RANDY MICHELSON (SBN 114095) 3 GEOFFREY T. HOLTZ (SBN 191370) Three Embarcadero Center 4 San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 5 Facsimile: (415) 393-2286 6 Attorneys for Creditor Reliant Energy Services, Inc. 7 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 In re Case No. 01-30923 DM 13 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Chapter 11 California corporation, 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Debtor. 15 Tax Identification No. 94-742640 16 17 18 I am over 18 years of age, not a party to this action and employed in the County 19 of San Francisco, California at Three Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, California 94111 20 4067. I am readily familiar with the practice of this office for collection and processing of 21 correspondence for facsimile transmission/mail/hand delivery/next business day delivery, and 22 they are deposited that same day in the ordinary course of business. 23 Today I served the following: 24 BRIEF OF CREDITOR RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES, INC. RE 25 DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES CLAIMS 26 AND DEADLINES FOR FILING CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE PROOF OF SERVICE (--1 1 OPPOSITION OF CREDITOR RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES, INC. TO 2 MOTION FOR AUTHORITY TO ASSUME POWER PURCHASE 3 AGREEMENTS BETWEEN PG&E AND CERTAIN QUALIFYING FACILITIES 4 DECLARATION OF BILL T. HAMILTON IN SUPPORT OF BRIEF OF 5 CREDITOR RELIANT ENERGY SERVICES, INC. RE DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES AND 6 DEADLINES FOR FILING CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS 7 on the following by facsimile transmission/mail/hand delivery/next business day delivery, in 8 sealed envelope(s), as respectively noted, with all fees prepaid at San Francisco, California, 9 addressed as follow: 11 SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST 12 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 13 that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on August 2, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FRANCISCO 2Nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report
    SAN FRANCISCO 2nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report Historical Asking Rental Rates (Direct, FSG) SF MARKET OVERVIEW $60.00 $57.00 $55.00 $53.50 $52.50 $53.00 $52.00 $50.50 $52.00 Prepared by Kathryn Driver, Market Researcher $49.00 $49.00 $50.00 $50.00 $47.50 $48.50 $48.50 $47.00 $46.00 $44.50 $43.00 Approaching the second half of 2014, the job market in San Francisco is $40.00 continuing to grow. With over 465,000 city residents employed, the San $30.00 Francisco unemployment rate dropped to 4.4%, the lowest the county has witnessed since 2008 and the third-lowest in California. The two counties with $20.00 lower unemployment rates are neighboring San Mateo and Marin counties, $10.00 a mark of the success of the region. The technology sector has been and continues to be a large contributor to this success, accounting for 30% of job $0.00 growth since 2010 and accounting for over 1.5 million sf of leased office space Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 this quarter. Class A Class B Pre-leasing large blocks of space remains a prime option for large tech Historical Vacancy Rates companies looking to grow within the city. Three of the top 5 deals involved 16.0% pre-leasing, including Salesforce who took over half of the Transbay Tower 14.0% (delivering Q1 2017) with a 713,727 sf lease. Other pre-leases included two 12.0% full buildings: LinkedIn signed a deal for all 450,000 sf at 222 2nd Street as well 10.0% as Splunk, who grabbed all 182,000 sf at 270 Brannan Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Boston Market Viewpoint
    GREATER BOSTON MARKET VIEWPOINT 3RD QUARTER 2014 Accelerating success. MARKET VIEWPOINT | Q3 2014 Boston Overview The vacancy rate in the 62.8-million-square-foot Boston office The largest third quarter leases represented Financial District market dropped to 11.1% during the third quarter, and nearly Class A buildings, with select transactions including: 800,000 square feet of positive absorption was recorded. The core Financial District and Back Bay submarkets were largely Tenant Address SF Submarket Financial responsible for the increased occupancy, with 522,000 and Sonos (n) Lafayette City Center 170,000 District 248,000 square feet of absorption, respectively. Financial CDM Smith (n) 75 State Street 170,000 While most of the smaller peripheral submarkets report single- District Financial State Street Bank (r) 100 Summer Street 167,000 digit vacancies, the vacancy rate in the Financial District is 13.1%, District a marked improvement from early 2011 when it topped 20%. Financial Choate Hall & Stewart (c) Two International Place 135,000 District Statistics in the core submarkets are as follows: Financial Jewish Vocational Service 101 Federal Street 42,200 District Supply Market Segment SF Available Vacancy Rate Financial Atlantic Trust 100 Federal Street 40,000 (SF) District Financial District – Class A 27,544,321 3,847,840 14.0% (n) = relocation from Cambridge (c) = contraction (r) = renewal Financial District – Class B 6,054,905 542,551 9.0% Back Bay – Class A 10,863,855 1,131,593 10.4% • The Financial District accounts for a slightly disproportionate Back Bay – Class B 2,030,085 311,428 15.3% share of the leasing activity thus far in 2014, with roughly 60 Seaport – Class A 3,067,295 209,696 6.8% percent of transaction velocity, compared to the Back Bay and Seaport – Class B 4,545,896 343,677 7.6% Seaport at 23 percent and 11 percent, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Massachusetts LOBBYISTS   617.646.1000 - BOSTON - WASHINGTON DC GREG M
    Directory of Massachusetts LOBBYISTS 617.646.1000 - www.oneillandassoc.com BOSTON - WASHINGTON DC GREG M. PETER J. VICTORIA E. MARK K. MATTHEW P. D’AGOSTINO D’AGOSTINO IRETON MOLLOY MCKENNA Lobbying & Public Aairs Providing comprehensive state and municipal advocacy. PRACTICE AREAS: TRANSPORTATION | HEALTH CARE PUBLIC SAFETY | REGULATIONS | ENERGY ENVIRONMENT | CANNABIS FINANCIAL SERVICES | EMERGING INDUSTRIES 12 POST OFFICE SQUARE, 6TH FLOOR | BOSTON, MA 02109 | 6175743399 WWW.TENAXSTRATEGIES.COM David Albright Oamshri Amarasingham Cynthia Arcate Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action American Civil Liberties PowerOptions, Inc. A 18 Tremont Street, Suite 320 Union of Massachusetts 129 South Street, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02108 211 Congress Street Boston, MA 02111 Anthony Arthur Abdelahad (617) 227-3000 Boston, MA 02110 (617) 428-4258 Ventry Associates LLP (617) 482-3170 1 Walnut Street Walter Alcorn Luz A. Arevalo Boston, MA 02108 Consumer Technology Association Robert J. Ambrogi Greater Boston, Legal Services (617) 423-0028 1919 South Eads Street Law Office of Robert Ambrogi 197 Friend Street Arlington, VA 22202 128 Main Street Boston, MA 02114 Tate Abdols (571)239-5209 Gloucester, MA 01930 (617) 603-1569 Onex Partners Advisor, Inc. (978) 317-0972 161 Bay Street Theodore J. Alexio Jr. Derek Armstrong Toronto, ON M5J 2S1 Essential Strategies Inc. Shannon Ames Bank of America, N.A. (416) 362-7711 One State Street, Suite 1100 Low Impact Hydropower Institute 100 Federal Street Boston, MA 02109 329 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 6 Boston, MA 02110 Brendan Scott Abel (617) 227-6666 Lexington, MA 02420 (617) 434-8613 Massachusetts Medical Society (781) 538-4266 860 Winter Street Waltham, MA 02451 Daniel Allegretti Gabriel Amo Kristina Ragosta Arnoux (781) 434-7682 Exelon Generation Company, LLC Magellan Health 1 Essex Drive The Home Depot 8621 Robert Fulton Drive Bow, NH 03304 166 Valley Street, 6M222 Columbia, MD 21046 Lisa C.
    [Show full text]
  • ULI Case Studies Sponsored By
    December 2014 ULI Case Studies Sponsored by 680 Folsom Street QUICK FACTS Location San Francisco, California Project type Office buildings Site size 1.54 acres Land uses Office, retail, restaurants, parking Keywords/special features Renovation, facade recladding, large floor plates, seismic retrofit, high floor-to-floor heights, high-density tenants, resilient design, tech-oriented tenants, roof deck, REIT, green building, sustainable development Websites www.bostonproperties.com/properties/ san-francisco-area www.tmgpartners.com/portfolio Project address 680 Folsom Street San Francisco, CA 94107 Owner/developer Boston Properties Four Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111 STEELBLUE www.bostonproperties.com The 680 Folsom redevelopment includes three structures: an office/retail building (foreground), a 14-story renovated office tower, and a separate three-story office building (not shown) behind and to the left of the tower. Developer TMG Partners 100 Bush Street, 26th Floor PROJECT SUMMARY San Francisco, CA 94104 www.tmgpartners.com Originally built in 1964, 680 Folsom Street is 14-story office building Development financial partner with 468,783 square feet of rentable space that has been completely Rockwood Capital Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2360 renovated and seismically retrofitted, and was reopened in January San Francisco, CA 94111 2014. The building is the principal structure in a three-building complex www.rockwoodcap.com that includes an adjacent three-story office building and a two-story Architect SOM retail/office building, both also renovated as part of the overall project One Front Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111 acquisition and development plan. Renovation of 680 Folsom involved www.som.com removal and replacement of nearly everything in the building except Structural engineer the steel frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Office Market Report
    BOSTON OFFICE MARKET REPORT SECOND QUARTER 2018 NO SIGNS OF SUMMER SLOWDOWN Greater Boston's market showed no signs of weakening during the second quarter by recording strong growth from numerous industry types. The market continued receiving inbound demand as well as converting organic growth into significant expansion. Most notably, Amazon's commitment to nearly 430,000 square feet at Parcel L4 in the Seaport reflects inbound demand while Wayfair's torrid expansion into roughly 395,000 SF in the Back Bay at 222 Berkeley and 500 Boylston Street exemplifies organic growth. The region's demographics and economy have remained solid which has supported and promoted Boston's recent expansion. Firmly rooted in education, technology and life sciences, Boston's diverse economic base has submitted strong job growth through increased recruitment and skilled labor retention from the area’s leading universities and institutions. Looking forward, expect durable market conditions and a diversified economy to guide the region's commercial real estate market to a strong performance over the next several years. 3.5% 3.8% # $2.6B 2ND MAY MAY MA QUARTERLY NATIONALLY IN MASSACHUSETTS NATIONAL VC FUNDING (Q1) QUARTERLY (Q1) UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT VC FUNDING CLASS A MARKET ASKING RATE VS. DIRECT VACANCY TRENDS $64.00 16.0% $61.00 14.0% $58.00 12.0% GLOBAL DESTINATION $55.00 10.0% World leader in medical innovation and $52.00 8.0% technological advancement $49.00 6.0% TOWER SALES RIPPLE $46.00 4.0% EFFECT Will recent Class A Tower sales push $43.00 2.0% rental rates even higher? $40.00 0.0% 201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006 YTD2018 TECHNOLOGY & Average Asking Rate Direct Vacancy (%) INNOVATION HUB Fortune 500 leaders and 1,900 homegrown startups CLASS B BUILD TO SUIT AND ASKING RATE VS.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Hidden Value
    With your help, we develop a strategy to maximize Discover both the total asset value and revenue generated by your building(s). We mitigate dispute risks and Hidden provide dynamic access to building and occupant Value related data throughout the ownership life-cycle. Measurement Report Occupant Services Starting with a thorough audit of existing Change is inevitable. However, with Stevenson construction documents and measurement Systems providing a comprehensive collection of reports, we follow up with on-site laser measured drawing types, lease exhibits, as-builts, cleaning verification, producing a comprehensive report calculations and suite calculation updates that strategically applies the correct produced within 30 minutes or less, you will be ready to execute your business strategy. measurement standard(s) to achieve the best result for the intended use. As-Builts Analytics Our laser measured, methodically collected Discover meaningful information hidden in your as-built drawings are carried out to the highest data. Our in-depth visual analyses allow you to standards of architectural integrity and serve as gain insight, ask new questions, spot trends, the foundation for many of our products and identify opportunities and make data-guided services. decisions with confidence. Consulting Measurement Standards Our comprehensive advisory service is Intimately involved with creating predominant supported by 30 years of experience and the global measurement standards since 1980’s, we analysis of more than one billion square feet of are
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Ethics Commission Disclosure Report for Permit
    DocuSign Envelope ID: 22F915A2-4A57-4DCD-ABD1-3562213B15D9 San Francisco Ethics Commission 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102 Received on: Phone: 415.252.3100 . Fax: 415.252.3112 04-14-2020\DateSigned | 16:28:46\ PDT [email protected] . www.sfethics.org \DateSigned\ Disclosure Report for Permit Consultants SFEC Form 3410B (S.F. Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code § 3.400A et seq.) A Public Document 1. FILING INFORMATION TYPE OF FILING DATE OF ORIGINAL FILING (for amendment only) \OriginalFilingType\ \OriginalFilingDate\ PERIOD COVERED \PeriodMonths\ \PeriodYear\ January 1 to March 31 2020 2. PERMIT CONSULTANT AND EMPLOYER INFORMATION NAME OF PERMIT CONSULTANT NAME OF EMPLOYER Kyle Thompson \PermitConsultantName\ A.R.\PermitConsultantEmployer Sanchez-Corea & \Associates, Inc. BUSINESS ADDRESS 301 Junipero Serra Blvd., Suite 270, San Francisco, CA 94127 \PermitConsultantAddress\ BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS EMAIL ADDRESS 415-333-8080 [email protected] \PermitConsultantTelephone\ \PermitConsultantEmail\ 3. CLIENT INFORMATION Enter the name, business address, contact person (if applicable), e-mail address, and business telephone number of each client for whom you performed permit consulting services during the reporting period. Also enter the amount of compensation you or your employer received or expected to receive from each client for permit consulting services during the reporting period. # CLIENT INFORMATION NAME OF CLIENT One De Haro, LLC c/o SKS Investments \ClientName1\ BUSINESS ADDRESS OF CLIENT 601
    [Show full text]
  • Item 9A Informational Presentation on SWL 351 Development Criteria
    MEMORANDUM May 22, 2008 TO: MEMBERS, PORT COMMISSION Hon. Kimberly Brandon, President Hon. Rodney Fong Vice President Hon. Ann Lazarus Hon. Michael Hardeman Hon. Stephanie Shakofsky FROM: Monique A. Moyer Executive Director SUBJECT: Informational Presentation on Development Criteria for SWL 351 (The Embarcadero at Washington Street) DIRECTOR’S RECOMMENDATION: Discussion Item, No Action Requested EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Seawall Lot 351 (“SWL 351”) is one of the development opportunities in San Francisco created by removal of the Embarcadero Freeway after the 1989 earthquake. The parcel is a nearly triangular site with a 358-foot frontage along The Embarcadero Roadway with a mere 26-foot frontage on Washington Street. (See Exhibit A, Site Map.) In the context of San Francisco, this 27,937 square foot lot has potential for effective development. At its December 11, 2007 meeting, the Port Commission received an informational presentation by San Francisco Waterfront Partners II, LLC (“SFWP”) of its proposed 8 Washington project, a mixed-use condominium development.1 The proposed project site, as currently conceived, includes a privately owned 2.5 acre property within the Golden Gateway area and the adjacent Port-owned SWL 351 located at Washington Street and The Embarcadero. This unsolicited development proposal has raised questions about the Port’s long-term land use and development plans for SWL 351. The Port’s Waterfront Land Use Plan (“Waterfront Plan”) identifies development parameters and acceptable land uses for SWL 351 and also notes the 1 The Port has not responded to SFWP’s proposal; rather the Port is engaging in a public process before considering any land transaction involving SWL 351.
    [Show full text]
  • 020 by the Numbers Se FINAL.Indd
    BY THE NUMBERS Wall Street fallout shakes real estate investment trusts in New York City and beyond 1. The average annual 2. The average annual 3. The amount of office 4. The percentage drop in returns generated by REITs returns expected from space held by Merrill Lynch value of Brookfield Properties over the past three decades REIT investments at World Financial Center, a shares on September 15 after for investors: over the next year: Brookfield Properties-owned Merrill Lynch was acquired complex: by Bank of America, the REIT’s largest one-day decline in eight years: 13.8% -10% 4.2 million sq. ft. 18% 5. The percentage 6. The percentage that 7. The amount of office 8. The percentage of of Boston Properties’ financial services firms make space Citigroup occupies at SL Green’s net operating New York City office up in SL Green’s office portfo- properties owned by SL Green, income that comes from holdings occupied lio, the largest industry which accounts for 13.4 per- exposure to the Manhattan by financial services represented in it: cent of the REIT’s revenue: office market: tenants: 22% 42% 5 million sq. ft. 86% 9. One analyst’s 10. The percentage drop 11. The dollar value of 12. The average daily dollar forecasted percentage drop in the value of SL Green stock all institutionally owned trading volume for publicly in office rents from their on September 15 after commercial real estate in the traded REITs in July 2008, recent peak for Manhattan, Lehman Brothers went U.S. owned by REITs, compared to $892 million which could hurt the city’s bankrupt, the REIT’s biggest which account for 10 to in July 2003 and office REITs: one-day fall ever: 15 percent of the total: $413 million in July 1998: 20% 20% $600 billion $4.6 billion 13.
    [Show full text]
  • 25% Engineering/Design Services Bruce Freeman Rail Trail
    Proposal 25% Engineering/Design Services Bruce Freeman Rail Trail SUBMITTED TO Town of Sudbury SUBMITTED BY Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. OCTOBER 3, 2014 October 3, 2014 Jody Kablack Director of Planning and Community Development Town of Sudbury Flynn Building 278 Old Sudbury Road Sudbury, MA 01776 Re: 25% Engineering/Design Services for the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail Dear Ms. Kablack: The Town of Sudbury has embarked on an important step towards the completion of the 4.6 mile section of the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail that runs through the center of town. The rail corridor extends from South Sudbury near Route 20 to the Sudbury/Concord Town line. To accomplish this, the Town has selected three rms to submit responses for the preparation of a 25% design plan to meet MasssDOT standards. VHB is thankful to be one of the rms selected for this important project and are delighted to have the opportunity to present our qualications, experience and vision to the Town of Sudbury. As a prequalied consultant with MassDOT, VHB is familiar with the agency’s requirements and standards, with a successful record of completing numerous MassDOT-funded multiuse path projects over the past 30 years. Our experience extends from Maine to Florida - from the Acadia Carriage roadways in Maine to the Venice Rail Trail in Sarasota County, Florida. We have worked on historic trails that respect historic places, trails that negotiate sensitive environmental resources, trails with complicated intersections, as well as trails with unique and dynamic abutter concerns. Our multiuse path experience in Massachusetts is especially strong.
    [Show full text]