DOCSLIB.ORG

Mimetic Evolution. New Comparative Perspectives on the Court of Justice of the European Union in Its Federal Judicial Architecture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mimetic Evolution. New Comparative Perspectives on the Court of Justice of the European Union in Its Federal Judicial Architecture Mimetic Evolution. New Comparative Perspectives on the Court of Justice of the European Union in its Federal Judicial Architecture Leonardo Pierdominici Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Laws of the European University Institute Florence, 29 February 2016 European University Institute Department of Law Mimetic Evolution. New Comparative Perspectives on the Court of Justice of the European Union in its Federal Judicial Architecture Leonardo Pierdominici Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Laws of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Loïc Azoulai, European University Institute Prof. Bruno De Witte, European University Institute Prof. Giuseppe Martinico, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna - Pisa Prof. Laurent Pech, Middlesex University London ©Title Leonardo Name Pierdominici,Surname, Institution 2015 Title Name Surname, Institution No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of Law – LL.M. and Ph.D. Programmes I Leonardo Pierdominici certify that I am the author of the work “Mimetic Evolution. New Comparative Perspectives on the Court of Justice of the European Union in its Federal Judicial Architecture” I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications. I certify that this work complies with the Code of Ethics in Academic Research issued by the European University Institute (IUE 332/2/10 (CA 297). The copyright of this work rests with its author. Quotation from this thesis is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This work may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. This authorisation does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that this work consists of 154654 words. Statement of language correction: This thesis has been corrected for linguistic and stylistic errors. I certify that I have checked and approved all language corrections, and that these have not affected the content of this work. 10 February 2016 Summary The dissertation aims at studying the historical institutional evolution of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the judicial arm of the supranational European community. The Court has been largely analysed, in the multidisciplinary field of European studies, particularly because of its central role in the process of continental integration, for the role played for the evolution of the European Union legal order. The perspective I would like to suggest and to develop in this work tries to differentiate itself by taking a somehow reverse standpoint. First, I will focus on the evolution of the Court itself, more than on the impressive evolution of the EU legal order and its judge-made nature. Naturally, this last aspect will be the background of my analysis. In this respect, I will not be much concerned with the evolution of case law, jurisprudence or the interpretative activity of the European Court but more on the structure and the organization of the Court itself, taken as an institution. Finally, I will try to develop this approach by making use of the precious insights provided by the comparative analysis of law. I will select some specific yetcentral aspects of the structural, organizational, institutional development of the Court in the decades since its foundation and will do this with a purpose. My aim is to show, through a comparative analysis, how the development and institutional evolution of the Court of Justice of the European Union can be considered mimetic - able to engage and somehow internalize the solicitations which came from EU Member States influences of different legal traditions (with increasing strain as the EU grew dimensionally) and responding to global challenges in relation to the increasing role of the international forms of judicial review and of the international judicial review bodies. This proved decisive, I argue, for strengthening the authority of the Court of Justice in its federal judicial architecture. The thesis was submitted for language correction Mimetic Evolution. New Comparative Perspectives on the Court of Justice of the European Union in its Federal Judicial Architecture Leonardo Pierdominici I. Introduction II. Situation for Research and Methodology 1. Situation for Research...........................................................................................................................11 2. Discovery (or Re-Discovery) of Historical Studies of European Union Law.......................................11 3. Discovery (or Re-Discovery) of DeBates on the Legitimacy and Authority of International Judicial Review Bodies............................................................................................................................................16 4. Discovery (or Re-Discovery) of DeBates on the Cultural Diversity in the Supranational Project, and its Role Within the Legal Context .......................................................................................................20 5. A Few Words on the Method and the Basic Idea: Mimetism as a link Between cultural studies and Functionalism in Supranational law.............................................................................................................25 6. Work Plan...............................................................................................................................................33 III. The Foundation and Structuring of the Powers of the Court 1. Choice of Form: the Original DeBate on the Creation of a Court for European Communities... ..........38 2. Design of Powers of the Court of Justice and National Influences........................................................48 2.1 The “Administrative” Competences of the Court.................................................................................49 2.2 Transformation of the Preliminary Reference Procedure.....................................................................60 3. Different Perspective, Same Dynamics: the EstaBlishment of Doctrines of Primacy and Direct Effect............................................................................................................................................................70 4. The Original Choices in the EstaBlishment of the Court of Justice as a Form of Improvement of its Authority......................................................................................................................................................78 IV. The Appointment of Members of the Court 1. Selection of Judges: Comparative Trends at the National and International Level and Their Rationale...............................................................….. .................................................................................82 1.2. The Historical Rise of Judicial Selection Models.........................................… ...................................82 1 1.3. Models of Apical Court Selections, in Europe and at the International Level....................................88 2. Selection of Judges of the Court of Justice of the EU: LiBeral Supranationalism as a Reaction to Pure Intergovernmentalism?......................................................................................................................101 3. The Evolution of Judicial Appointments as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority.................................................................................. ..................................................................114 V. The Deliberation of the Court and its Transparency 1. Openness as Access to DeliBeration: Comparative Remarks..............................................….............123 2. Openness as Access to DeliBeration: the DeBate for the European Court of Justice (also with Reference to the Advocates General and their Opinions).........................................................139 2.1 Old and New DeBates on the Adoption of Dissenting Opinions in LuxemBourg......... ......................139 2.2 The Advocates General and Their Role in the Transparency of the Court's DeliBerations......…......147 3. Openness as Access to Court Documents..................................................... ........................................156 3.1 Access to Court Documents as a Second Dimension of Openness.........................................….......156 3.2 The International DeBate, the Comparative Paradigms.......................…...........................................159 3.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents: the DeBate in European Union law..................................171 4. Dimensions of Openness and the Authority of the Court of Justice................. ...................................190 VI. Docket Control at the Court of Justice 1. The European Court of Justice and its Docket......................... ............................................................196 2. Docket Control as the Use of Certiorari and Procedural “Passive Virtues”.................…...................205 3. The PossiBility of Adopting Other “Passive Virtues” in LuxemBourg...................................…
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The European Union in Transition: the Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; a Constitution in Doubt
    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 27, Issue 2 2003 Article 1 The European Union in Transition: The Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; A Constitution in Doubt Roger J. Goebel∗ ∗ Copyright c 2003 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj The European Union in Transition: The Treaty of Nice in Effect; Enlargement in Sight; A Constitution in Doubt Roger J. Goebel Abstract This Article is intended to provide an overview of this transitional moment in the history of the European Union. Initially, the Article will briefly review the background of the Treaty of Nice, and the institutional structure modifications for which it provides, which paves the way for enlargement. Next it will describe the final stages of the enlargement process. Finally, the Article will set out the principal institutional innovations and certain other key aspects of the draft Constitution, the most important issues concerning them, and the current impasse. THE EUROPEAN UNION IN TRANSITION: THE TREATY OF NICE IN EFFECT; ENLARGEMENT IN SIGHT; A CONSTITUTION IN DOUBT Rogerj Goebel* INTRODUCTION Once again the European Union' (the "EU" or the "Union") is in a stage of radical evolution. Since the early 1990's, the EU has anticipated an extraordinary increase in its constituent Member States2 through the absorption of a large number of Central European and Mediterranean nations. Since the late 1990's, the Union has been negotiating the precise terms for their entry with a dozen applicant nations and has been providing cooperative assistance to them to prepare for their accession to the Union and in particular, its principal con- stituent part, the European Community.3 As this enlargement of the Union came more clearly in sight, the political leadership and the present Member States, joined by the Commission, con- * Professor and Director of the Center on European Union Law, Fordham Univer- sity School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Protection Order for Victims > Criminal Judicial Cooperation and Gender-Based Violence
    Información ORGANISING COMMITTEE Palau de Pineda UIMP courses in Valencia are 4 Plaza del Carmen, 4 Manuel de Lorenzo Segrelles, Bar Association of Valencia. 46003 Valencia validated by elective credits International Congress Gemma Gallego Sánchez, Judge, former member of the General Tel. +34 963 108 020 / 019 / 018 in public universities Fax: +34 963 108 017 of the Valencian Community. Council of the Judiciary of Spain. Administrative Secretary opening hours*: Check with the home Elena Martínez García, Senior Lecturer of Procedural Law, University 10,00 - 13,30 h. university the number of Thursday: credits recognised of Valencia. 16,30 - 18,00 h. The European Protection Order for Laura Román, Senior Lecturer of Constitutional Law, Rovira i Virgili * CLOSED AUGUST 1st TO 24th Victims University, Epogender porject. The registration gives the The registration period for the congress right to obtain Criminal judicial cooperation and gender-based is o p e n until the b e g inning o f the s e m ina r a certificate of attendance while places are still available. (a tte n d a n c e violence SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE at more than 85% of Registration fees: Beatriz Belando Garín, Senior Lecturer of Administrative Law, sessions). University of Valencia. - 75 euros (55 euros academic fees + 20 euros secretary fees) for students Christoph Burchard, Lecturer, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, enroled in all the universities of the Germany. Valencian Community. Directors: Elisabet Cerrato, Lecturer of Procedural Law, Rovira i Virgili University, - 108 euros (88 euros academic fees Teresa Freixes Sanjuán Epogender project. + 20 euros secretary fees) for students Elena Martínez García Laura Ervo, Professor of Procedural Law, Örebro University, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Spanish Government on the Visit to Spain Carried out by The
    CPT/Inf (2013) 6 Report to the Spanish Government on the visit to Spain carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 31 May to 13 June 2011 The Spanish Government has requested the publication of this report and of its response. The Government’s response is set out in document CPT/Inf (2013) 7. Strasbourg, 30 April 2013 - 2 - CONTENTS Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report............................................................................5 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................6 A. Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation ..............................................................6 B. Establishments visited...............................................................................................................7 C. Consultations held by the delegation.......................................................................................9 D. Co-operation between the CPT and the authorities of Spain ...............................................9 E. Immediate observations under Article 8, paragraph 5, of the Convention .......................10 II. FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED ..............................11 A. Law enforcement agencies......................................................................................................11 1. Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union and Legitimacy: Time for a European Constitution Mark Killian Brewer*
    Cornell International Law Journal Volume 34 Article 5 Issue 3 2001 The urE opean Union and Legitimacy: Time for a European Constitution Mark Killian Brewer Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brewer, Mark Killian (2001) "The urE opean Union and Legitimacy: Time for a European Constitution," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 34: Iss. 3, Article 5. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol34/iss3/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The European Union and Legitimacy: Time for a European Constitution Mark Killian Brewer* Introduction ..................................................... 555 I. Background .............................................. 558 A. The Emergence of Neoconstitutionalism ............... 558 B. The Components of Neoconstitutionalism .............. 560 1. The European Treaties Lack the Form of Traditional Constitutional Law ................................. 560 2. The European Treaties Lack the Authority of Traditional Constitutional Law ...................... 562 3. The Communities Lack a Demos .................... 563 C. The Doctrine of Supremacy and German Resistance .... 564 D. The German Legal Framework ........................ 565 E.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Sonnett Memorial Lecture Series
    Fordham Law School FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Lectures John F. Sonnett Memorial Lecture Series 11-1-1990 John F. Sonnett Memorial Lecture Series: Legal Remedies Against the Council's Failure to Act Ole Due European Court of Justice Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/events_programs_sonnet_lectures Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Due, Ole, "John F. Sonnett Memorial Lecture Series: Legal Remedies Against the Council's Failure to Act" (1990). Lectures. 5. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/events_programs_sonnet_lectures/5 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the John F. Sonnett Memorial Lecture Series at FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lectures by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 4. Due's Lecture: a. Due Biography Due Biography 1st draft Ole Due was born on February 10, 1931. Due received his law • degree from the University of Copenhagen in 1955, and in the same year, took up a post at Denmark's Ministry of Justice. In the years that followed, Ole Due worked in national service and was ultimately able to serve all of the European Community, as President of the Court of Justice. Like John Sonnett, Due devoted many of his early professional years to service of his country. At the Ministry of Justice, Due steadily worked his way to important positions of responsibility. In 1970, he became Head of Division and was made Director of the Ministry of Justice some five years later.
    [Show full text]
  • 001-004 JUECES 80.Indd
    INFORMACIÓN Y DEBATE R. Sáez Valcárcel, Justicia universal en España. T. Vicen- te y C. Berzosa, El triunfo de las finanzas capitalistas y el deterioro de los derechos. E. Calvo Rojas, La denominada ‘doctrina jurisprudencial vinculante’. Comisión de Derecho Privado de JpD, La protección de los clientes de banca y las últimas reformas legislativas. A. del Moral García, Justicia penal y corrupción. N. Maurandi Guillén, El control de la discrecionalidad técnica. Grupo de trabajo de JpD, Sobre el anteproyecto Gallardón de LOPJ. F. J. Pereda Gámez, Los tribunales de instancia. G. Alcoba Gutiérrez, Jueces en expectativa de destino. F. Zubiri de Salinas, Acceso a los recursos y tutela judicial. Jaume González Calvet, Las medidas cautelares en el proceso de ejecución social. P. Gi- lligan, La Red Europea de Consejos de Justicia. 80 julio / 2014 INFORMACIÓN Y DEBATE nº 80 julio 2014 En este número: Alcoba Gutiérrez, Gonzalo, juez en expectativa de destino, Juzgado de Pri- mera Instancia e Instrucción n.º 5 de El Ejido (Almería). Berzosa Alonso Martínez, Carlos, catedrático de Economía, Universidad Complutense (Madrid), presidente de la Sociedad de Economía Mundial y presidente de la Comisión Española de Ayuda al Refugiado (CEAR). Calvo Rojas, Eduardo, magistrado, Sala Tercera, Tribunal Supremo. Del Moral García, Antonio, magistrado, Sala Segunda, Tribunal Supremo. Gilligan, Paul, presidente de la Red Europea de Consejos de Justicia; magis- trado del Tribunal Superior de Justicia (Irlanda) González Calvet, Jaume, magistrado, Juzgado de lo Social n.º 30, Barcelona. Maurandi Guillén, Nicolás, magistrado, Sala Tercera, Tribunal Supremo. Pereda Gámez, Fco. Javier, magistrado, Audiencia Provincial, Barcelona. Sáez Vácárcel, Ramón, magistrado, Sala de lo Penal, Audiencia Nacional.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of European Rights
    The Politics of European Rights Willem Maas Yale University For Panel 15-5 ‘The Construction of Individual Rights in the European Union’ Abstract Citizenship rights in most states generally evolved through a long process of political contestation between rulers and subjects, but this is not the case in the European Union. Understanding the development of European rights – expressed in treaties and regulations signed by member states, directives issued by the Commission, and rulings and interpretations made by the Court – would not be complete without exploring the politics surrounding their introduction and expansion. This paper undertakes such an examination by focusing on the key right of EU citizenship: mobility, which consists of the freedom to move and the freedom to take up residence anywhere within the Union. On the basis of a sketch of the historical evolution of these mobility rights, a number of hypotheses are advanced. Willem Maas Box 203942 Yale Station New Haven CT 06520-3942 http://pantheon.yale.edu/~wm54/ [email protected] Prepared for delivery at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, 30 August - 2 September 2001. © Willem Maas and the American Political Science Association. Please don’t cite without permission. I welcome comments/suggestions for improvement. Willem Maas – The Politics of European Rights 1 Introduction Citizenship rights in most states generally evolved through a long process of political contestation between rulers and subjects. In the European Union, however, rights were simply introduced by treaties or regulations, and in some cases even fleshed out by Commission directives. They have also been subject to expansive interpretations by the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union and Legitimacy: Time for a European Constitution
    The European Union and legitimacy: time for a European Constitution BREWER, Mark Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/23241/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version BREWER, Mark (2001). The European Union and legitimacy: time for a European Constitution. Cornell International Law Journal, 34 (3), 555-584. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Cornell International Law Journal Volume 34 Article 5 Issue 3 2001 The urE opean Union and Legitimacy: Time for a European Constitution Mark Killian Brewer Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brewer, Mark Killian (2001) "The urE opean Union and Legitimacy: Time for a European Constitution," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 34: Iss. 3, Article 5. Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol34/iss3/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell International Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The European Union and Legitimacy: Time for a European Constitution Mark Killian Brewer* Introduction ..................................................... 555 I. Background .............................................. 558 A. The Emergence of Neoconstitutionalism ............... 558 B. The Components of Neoconstitutionalism .............. 560 1. The European Treaties Lack the Form of Traditional Constitutional Law ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Minimal Judicial Standards III Report 2012-2013
    ENCJ PROJECT TEAM Development of Minimal Judicial Standards III Minimum Standards regarding evaluation of professional performance and irremovability of members of the judiciary Report 2012-2013 With the support of the European Union INDEX 0. Abstract .-_________________________________________________________________ 3 1. Introduction.- ______________________________________________________________ 3 1.1. Background.- __________________________________________________________ 3 1.2. The Report ____________________________________________________________ 6 1.3. The Questionnaire ______________________________________________________ 7 2. Proposals of Minimum Standards regarding evaluation of professional performance of judges and (where relevant) prosecutors.- ________________________________________ 10 2.1 Potential aims of the systems of evaluation.- ________________________________ 12 2.2 Criteria applied to the evaluation of professional performance.- ________________ 13 2.3 Competent body to conduct the evaluation of professional performance.- ________ 16 2.4 Process for the evaluation of professional performance.- ______________________ 17 3. Proposals of Minimum Standards regarding irremovability of judges.- _______________ 18 4. Summary of proposals ___________________________________________________ 21 Annex - Participants List – 2012/2013 ___________________________________________ 25 ENCJ Project Team Development of minimum judicial standards III 2012-2013 - 2 - REPORT Project Team on Development of Minimum Judicial Standards
    [Show full text]
  • General Council of the Judiciary
    INNOVATOR STORY General Council of the Judiciary Web analytics help to measure the success of the site and overall performance, equipping the CGPJ with the tools it needs to present users with a relevent and responsive experience, supported by multimedia content. FIGURE 3.5: PoderJudicial.es The General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial or CGPJ) was established by the Spanish Constitution in 1978 as the constitutional body that governs the Judiciary of Spain. The CGPJ wanted to combine its systems into an online portal to provide citizens with personalized access to the information and services they needed. The new portal would support a variety of communication channels in multiple languages. On the back end, the system would be required to integrate all corporate services of the Judiciary Council to streamline collaboration, provide integrated services such as online applications, allow for the secure management of information, and comply with current regulations around transparency, accessibility, multilingualism, Law 11/2007, and more. An e-government solution was selected as the basis for the CGPJ website and judiciary extranet, providing the Council with a technologically sound and manageable platform for the future. The multilingual portal supports a substantial number of hits and is readily scalable. The web publishing process is more efficient; self-service capabilities have significantly reduced the time it takes to publish up-to-date information. The system went live internally with 6,500 active users and 5,400 messages exchanged on its forums. Members of the Judiciary can participate and collaborate using the system’s virtual environments, 45 communities of practices, and shared files.
    [Show full text]
  • A Kafkaesque Experience Before Spanish 'Justice'
    CORRUPTION IN SPAIN AND THE JUDICIAL ‘FRAMING’ OF JUDGE BALTASAR GARZÓN REAL (Part two) by George Venturini * A Kafkaesque experience before Spanish ‘justice’ During half of January and the whole month of February 2012, Judge Garzón sat in his judicial robe next to his lawyer Francisco Javier Baena Bocanegra before the judges of the Second Chamber of the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court, defending himself from the charges brought against him by private individuals and organisations rather than the State. In fact, during investigations and at the trials, public prosecutors had recommended Judge Garzón’s acquittal. What was happening to Judge Garzón had undoubtedly a bad political odour. The three private prosecutions had been brought by a curious outfit, a fictitious trade union called Manos Limpias, Clean Hands, directed by Miguel Bernad Remón, an official of the far-Right party Fuerza Nueva, another seedy organisation called Libertad e Identitad, Liberty and Identity and the Falange de la JONS, which is an acronym for Juntas de Ofensiva Nacional-Sindicalista, Phalanx of the Assemblies of the National Syndicalist Offensive - a Neo-Francoist set-up, and by lawyers connected with gaoled persons who had been involved in wide-spread corruption mainly for the advantage of people in the Popular Party, and by other lawyers who were accusing Judge Garzón of corruption. The specific charge against Judge Garzón is: delito de prevaricacion - which means the use by a judge of his authority intentionally to subvert the course of justice, and that in violation of art. 446.3 of the Criminal Code. This is a very serious criminal offence punishable by suspension from any judicial activity for up to twenty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents VOLUME 7.1 2017
    VOLUME 7.1 2017 Contents Jinshi Chen 1-18 Chunks in Information Flow: a Corpus-based Analysis of Legal Discourse Paula Trzaskawka 19-32 Investigating Trademark Terminology and Collocations in Polish, English, Japanese and German Robin Nilon 33-54 A Better Way to Fail: Teaching Critical Thinking to Chinese Lawyers 55-77 Stefan Wrbka The European Case Law Identifier Search Engine and Multilingualism: A Legal Certainty Perspective on Business-to-Consumer Situations 78-110 Wm. Dennis Huber Law, language, and corporatehood: corporations and the U.S. Constitution International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse Volume 7.1 June 2017 Chief Editor Le Cheng The International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse is an affiliated journal of Multicultural Association of Law and Language. The International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse is an interdisciplinary and cross-cultural peer-reviewed scholarly journal, integrating academic areas of law, linguistics, discourse analysis, psychology and sociology, presenting articles related to legal issues, review of cases, comments and opinions on legal cases and serving as a practical resource for lawyers, judges, legislators, applied linguists, discourse analysts and those academics who teach the future legal generations. For electronic submission Chief Editor: Le Cheng (chengle163@@hotmail.com) Editorial Manager: Jian Li ([email protected]) Production Editor: Jane Lee ([email protected]) Published by English Language Education (ELE) Publishing A diving of TESOL Asia A division of SITE Australia LTD Brisbane, Australia http://www.ijlld.com © International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse (IJLLD) 2017 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of the IJLLD.
    [Show full text]