Ebola Virus Vaccine Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ebola Virus Vaccine Development Dale and Betty Bumpers Vaccine Research Center National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institutes of Health Department of Health and Human Services Ebola Virus Vaccine Development Nancy J. Sullivan, Ph.D. Chief, Biodefense Research Section, VRC, NIAID, NIH Les Pensieres, Fondation Merieux Conference Center January 12, 2015 Early Experimental Approaches to Vaccines Against Ebolavirus Killed virus (MBG) vaccine Enhanced disease in guinea pigs Recombinant protein (insect cells) Partial protection in guinea pigs (MBG) No protection in primates Have filoviruses evolved mechanisms to evade humoral immunity? Challenges for Protective Humoral Immunity Against Ebolavirus Pleomorphic (length 14,000nm) and high density glycoprotein…accessible? Stable virion, lethal infection with few particles Broad tropism and multi-organ distribution Rapid internalization via macropinocytosis and use of intracellular receptor Vaccine-Induced Immune Protection Against Ebolavirus Infection DNA/rAd EBOV GP Weeks 0 4 8 20 32 VP30 VP24 L VP40 GP 5’ NP VP35 3’ rAd EBOV IR Overlap Trailer Leader IR Overlap• IRDNA/rAd5Edit Overlap demonstrates proof of principle for vaccine Site protection of macaquesWeeks 0 4 • Single shot rAd5 vaccine provides rapid protection Plasmid DNA Replication-defective rAd 100 NHP: Cynomolgus macaques BSL4, n=4 per group 50 EBOV: IM challenge % Survival 1000 PFU Mortality at 6-9 days 0 No vaccine DNA/rAd5 rAd5 (n>50*) (n=8) (n=23*) Sullivan et al., Nature 2000, 2003 Pathway to Licensure for Ebola and Marburg Vaccines Nature Rev Microbiol., 2009 VRC Filovirus Vaccine Clinical Trial History Year / n= Study Vector Insert Outcome Phase Product/ Placebo 5/2 Safe 2003 Ebola (Z+S) VRC 204 DNA 8/2 Immunogenic Phase I ∆TM GP 8/2 No rapid protection in NHP Safe 2006 Ebola (Z+S) 12/4 VRC 205 Ad5 Immunogenic Phase I PM GP 12/4 Sub-optimal NHP protection Ebola (Z+S) WT GP Safe 2008 VRC 206 DNA 20 Immunogenic Phase I Marburg (A) No rapid protection in NHP WT GP Ebola (Z+S) WT GP Safe 2009 90/6 RV 247 DNA Immunogenic Phase IB Marburg (A) No rapid protection in NHP WT GP Safe 2014 Ebola (Z+S) VRC 207 cAd3 20 Immunogenic Phase I WT GP Rapid protection in NHP * numbers of subjects that received Ebola vaccine are shown in bold Optimization of Vaccine Dose (rAd5 GP/NP) Challenge: Experimental groups: 28 days post-immunization n=3 cynomolgus macaques per group 1000 PFU Ebola Zaire Vaccine dose escalation 1-log increments 100 Vaccine Dose 1012 80 101 1 1010 60 109 Control 40 PercentSurvival 20 0 0 1 2 Week s PLoS Medicine 2006 Preliminary Identification of Immune Correlate for rAd5-GP/NP Vaccine Protection Survivors CD8+ T-cell Antibody Fatalities 2.5 25000 2.0 20000 1.5 +) a - 15000 GP IgG GP - 1.0 Anti 10000 CD8+ (TNF CD8+ (percent positive) (percent 0.5 (Reciprocal Endpoint Dilution Titer) Dilution Endpoint (Reciprocal 5000 0.0 0 Vaccine Dose (Particle Units) PLoS Medicine 2006 ELISA IgG Against EBOV GP is an Immune Correlate of Protection (rAd5 Vaccines - NHP) 1700 3700 Odds ratio >100 p = 0.005 Ebola challenge dose > 100x LD99 (parenteral exposure) Sullivan et al, 2009, Nat. Rev. Micro. Immune Correlate of Protection Evidence that T Cells are Needed for Uniform Protection by rAd5-GP Vaccine 1. Cross protection against Ebola Bundibugyo with Ebola Zaire GP vaccine achieved in the absence of Bundi-specific Ab 2. Passive Ab transfer does not protect naïve NHP, and CD8 depletion eliminates protective immunity in vaccinated NHP Anti-Zaire ELISA IgG (GP) is a nCoP IgG ELISA GP Anti-Bundi V4: EBOV RNA+ Efficacy of Rare Serotype Human rAds for Protection Against Ebola virus in Macaques 1 0 0 7 5 5 0 % Survival % Survival 2 5 Ab = 1700 Ab = 1300 0 1010 1010 1011 1010 1011 Ad5 Ad35 Ad26 Journal of Virology, 2011 Do Lower Ad26 and Ad35 T-cell Responses Explain Reduced Protection? CD4 CD8 0 .4 0 .5 0 .4 0 .3 + 0 .3 0 .2 0 .2 Cytokine 0 .1 0 .1 (% Memory Subset) Memory (% 0 .0 0 .0 Ad5 Ad26 Ad35 Ad5 Ad26 Ad35 CD4 and CD8 responses as high as rAd5 Qualitatively Distinct Cytokine Secretion Patterns That Define Functional T-cell Responses (12-Color Flow Cytometry) IFN-g IFN-g IFN-g TNF-a IL-2 IFN-g TNF-a Each combination (subset) is functionally distinct CD8 T-Cell Functional Quality Associated with rAd Vector Vaccines in Macaques 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 2+ 1+ 2+ 1+ 1+ 1+ 2+ 2+ rAd26 rAd35 rAd5 ChAd3 TNF/IFNg “Effector” 3+ 2+ 1+ Selection of Alternative Adenovirus Vectors For an Ebolavirus Vaccine B Ad35 Ad34 Ad11 Ad50 Ad4 ChAd30 ChAd63 100 Ad16 E Ad7 52 100 Ad3 C7 ChAd20 100 100 99 AdC68 100 100 100 Ad5 93 98 ChAd6 100 Ad24 100 100 57 C 54 Ad48 ChAd3 100 97 62 100 37 92 71 98 100 Ad49 Ad10 D Ad6 Ad26 Ad43 Ad2 Ad37 Ad41 Ad18 Ad40 Ad12 F A Acute and Durable Protection by ChAds Vaccinate ChAd Ebola Ebolavirus Ebolavirus GP challenge challenge (n = 4/group) Weeks: 0 1 2 3 4 5 9-12 months (Ab, ICS) Is a prime-boost vaccine better for generating durable protective immunity? Acute Protection Durable Protection 1 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 8 0 l l a a v v i i v 6 0 v 6 0 r r u u S S 4 0 4 0 % % 2 0 2 0 0 0 rAd5 ChAd3 ChAd63 ChAd3 ChAd3 ChAd63 1010 VP 1010 VP 1010 VP 1011 VP 1010 VP 1010 VP Prime-Boost Vaccination to Generate Durable Protective Immunity Inserts: GP(Z) + GP(S), codon-optimized ChAd3: To generate rapid protection MVA: Pox vectors generate strong CD4 T-cell response needed for long-term CD8 memory ChAd/MVA Prime: Boost: Ebolavirus ChAd 1010 MVA 108 Challenge 10 months 0 4 8 12 Peak Memory Weeks Quality of MVA-Boosted CD8+ T-cell Responses Boost: Prime: (n=4/group) Ebolavirus 10 8 ChAd 10 PU MVA 10 Challenge Weeks: 0 4 8 10-12 9-12 months Week 4 Week 10-12 Week 38 3+ TNF/IFNg ChAd3 ChAd63 ChAd3 ChAd63 ChAd3 ChAd63 “Memory” MVA boosts memory CD8 with either ChAd3 or ChAd63 prime ChAd3 exceeds ChAd63 for maintenance of TNF/IFNg effectors Relative Potency of ChAd3/MVA and ChAd63/MVA for Induction of Durable Protection Against Ebola Challenge Protection (10 months post vaccine) 1 0 0 8 0 6 0 4 0 % Survival % Survival % 2 0 0 No vaccine ChAd3/MVA ChAd63/MVA Effector and memory CD8+ T cells associate with long term protection ChAd3/MVA established as lead candidate for Phase I clinical testing Ebola Bivalent and Monovalent Vaccines Bivalent Monovalent 1. Bulk cAd3 cAd3 1. Bulk cAd3 cAd3 GP Zaire GP Sudan GP Zaire GP Sudan 2. Vialed 2. Vialed 1:1 Ratio Zaire only 3. Bivalent, cAd3-EBO 3. Monovalent, cAd3-EBOZ Julie Ledgerwood Ebola Vaccine Clinical Trial Schema A Phase I, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Clinical Trial VRC 207 Study Schema Group Subjects Day 0 1 10 cAd3-EBO at 2x1010 PU 2 10 cAd3-EBO at 2x1011 PU Total 20 IM Injections in 1 mL volume with needle and syringe Julie Ledgerwood Ebola Vaccine Safety Data • Well tolerated • No Serious Adverse Events • Low incidence of fever • 0% (0/10) at 2x1010 • 20% (2/10) at 2x1011 Julie Ledgerwood Ebola Vaccine Antibody Response in Humans Z a ir e S u d a n 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ) ) 0 0 9 9 C 1 0 0 0 C 1 0 0 0 E E ( ( A A S S I I L L E E 1 0 0 1 0 0 P P G G 1 0 1 0 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 k k k k k k k k e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e W W W W W W W W 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 G ro u p 1 : 2 x 1 0 P U G ro u p 2 : 2 x 1 0 P U G ro u p 1 : 2 x 1 0 P U G ro u p 2 : 2 x 1 0 P U GMT 331 2037 279 936 at Week 4 (158-695) (1007-4118) (154-505) (433-2021) Ledgerwood, et al. NEJM 2014 Confidential, Unpublished data GP-S Specific GP-Z Specific ** *** *** * *** *** *** CD4 Ebola 0.Vaccine4 T-Cell Responses in HumansMe mory t e s T Cells b u S f 0.2 o % CD8 Memory T Cells , e s n 0.0 GP-S Specific GP-Z Specific o , p e 1.5 s ** ** ** * ** ** * e s 1.5 ** ** ** * ** ** * R n CD8 o e n p i t Memory s k e e o s 1.0 t 1.0 T Cells R y b C u e l n S a i t f k o o o T 0.5 t 0.5 y % C l a t 0.0 o T 0.0 Week: 0 2 4 0 2 4 Week: 0 2 4 0 2 4 10 11 10 11 Week: D0ose:2 2x104 0 2x102 4 WeDoseek:: 02x102 4 2x100 2 4 Dose: 2x1010 2x1011 Dose: 2x1010 2x1011 Ledgerwood, et al. NEJM 2014 JulieConfidential, Ledgerwood Unpublished data Ebola Vaccine Induces Polyfunctional T-Cells In Human Subjects CD4 T Cells CD8 T Cells IFN IL2 TNF + + + – + + + – + + + – – – + – + – – – + IFN+ TNF+ 2x1010 2x1011 Dose 2x1010 2x1011 Polyfunctional CD8 T cell responses resemble protected NHP responses (Stanley et al, Nat Med 2014) Ledgerwood, et al.
Recommended publications
  • A Multicenter, Multi-Outbreak, Randomized, Controlled Safety And
    2018 Ebola MCM RCT Protocol Page 1 of 92 IND#: 125530 CONFIDENTIAL 4 October 2019, version 7.0 A Multicenter, Multi-Outbreak, Randomized, Controlled Safety and Efficacy Study of Investigational Therapeutics for the Treatment of Patients with Ebola Virus Disease Short Title: 2018 Ebola MCM RCT Protocol Sponsored by: Office of Clinical Research Policy and Regulatory Operations (OCRPRO) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 5601 Fishers Lane Bethesda, MD 20892 NIH Protocol Number: 19-I-0003 Protocol IND #: 125530 ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT03719586 Date: 4 October 2019 Version: 7.0 CONFIDENTIAL This document is confidential. No part of it may be transmitted, reproduced, published, or used by other persons without prior written authorization from the study sponsor and principal investigator. 2018 Ebola MCM RCT Protocol Page 2 of 92 IND#: 125530 CONFIDENTIAL 4 October 2019, version 7.0 KEY ROLES DRC Principal Investigator: Jean-Jacques Muyembe-Tamfum, MD, PhD Director-General, DRC National Institute for Biomedical Research Professor of Microbiology, Kinshasa University Medical School Kinshasa Gombe Democratic Republic of the Congo Phone: +243 898949289 Email: [email protected] Other International Investigators: see Appendix E Statistical Lead: Lori Dodd, PhD Biostatistics Research Branch, DCR, NIAID 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 4C31 Rockville, MD 20852 Phone: 240-669-5247 Email: [email protected] U.S. Principal Investigator: Richard T. Davey, Jr., MD Clinical Research Section, LIR, NIAID, NIH Building 10, Room 4-1479, Bethesda,
    [Show full text]
  • T. Franklin Williams Scholars Program
    Developing a New Generation of Medical Subspecialists with Expertise in Aging and Care of the Elderly T. Franklin Williams Scholars Program Report to T. Franklin Williams Scholars Program Evaluation Team ASP Geriatrics Steering Committee Integrating Geriatrics Project Evaluation Team May 2011 Submitted by: Erika D. Tarver Project Administrator Association of Specialty Professors 330 John Carlyle Road Suite 610 Alexandria, VA 22314 T: (703) 341-4540 F: (703) 519-1890 [email protected] Kevin P. High, MD Principal Investigator William R. Hazzard, MD Co-Principal Investigator Table of Contents Narrative Progress Report Application and Award Progress Summary of Success of T. Williams Scholars Program Appendices A. 2008 Scholars 24-Month Progress Reports Neena S. Abraham, MD (Note: This is Dr. Abraham’s final report) Steven G. Coca, DO Jeffrey G. Horowitz, MD Danelle F. James, MD Heidi Klepin, MD George C. Wang, MD 2009 Williams Scholars Progress Reports and Summary of 18-Month Questionnaire B. Peter Abadir, MD 12-month Progress Report C. Kathleen M. Akgun, MD 12-Month Progress Report Publication D. Alison Huang, MD 12-Month Progress Report Publication E. Eswar Krishnan, MD 12-Month Progress Report Publication F. Rohit Loomba, MD Publication G. Sharmilee Nyenhuis, MD 12-Month Progress Report Publication H. Peter P. Reese, MD 12-Month Progress Report Publication I. Erik B. Schelbert, MD 12-Month Progress Report Publication J. Helen Keipp Talbot, MD 12-Month Progress Report Publication K. Summary of 18-Month Questionnaire 2010 Williams Scholars Mentor Interviews and Summary of Six-Month Questionnaire L. Kellie Hunter-Campbell, MD Six-Month Mentor Interview M.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Pre-Proof
    Journal Pre-proof Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment and prevention Juan P. Jaworski PII: S2319-4170(20)30209-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.11.011 Reference: BJ 374 To appear in: Biomedical Journal Received Date: 2 September 2020 Revised Date: 6 November 2020 Accepted Date: 22 November 2020 Please cite this article as: Jaworski JP, Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment and prevention, Biomedical Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020.11.011. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Chang Gung University. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. TITLE: Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment and prevention Juan P. JAWORSKI Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina KEYWORDS: SARS-CoV-2, Coronavirus, Monoclonal Antibody, mAb, Prophylaxis, Treatment CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. Juan Pablo Jaworski, DVM, MSc, PhD. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto de Virología, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria Las Cabañas y de los Reseros (S/N), Hurlingham (1686), Buenos Aires, Argentina Tel / Fax: 054-11-4621-1447 (int:3400) [email protected] ABSTRACT The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused unprecedented global health and economic crises.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Zoonotic and Vector-Borne Viral Threats NIAID Vaccine
    4/1/2020 PROTOTYPE PATHOGEN APPROACH TO PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS HIV→PNEUMOVIRUS→PARAMYXOVIRUS→CORONAVIRUS ADVAC Alumni 2 April 2020 Barney S. Graham, MD, PhD Deputy Director Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH 1 Recent Zoonotic and Vector-borne Viral Threats • Hanta virus • Nipah/Hendra • West Nile virus • SARS • Influenza • Chikungunya • Ebola • MERS • Zika • EV‐D68 • SARS‐CoV‐2 2 NIAID Vaccine Research Center Basic Research Process Development Nucleic acid Vectors VLPs • AIDS/HIV • Influenza Proteins and cGMP Manufacturing nanoparticles • Ebola/Marburg • RSV • Malaria Monoclonal antibodies • Tuberculosis • EID GLP Analysis • West Nile virus, Zika • Chikungunya • W/E/V equine encephalitis viruses • MERS‐CoV, SARS, and other CoV • Nipah and other paramyxoviruses • EV‐D68 and other picornaviruses Clinical Trials • Smallpox 3 1 4/1/2020 Public health burden of re-emerging & emerging viruses Traditional Approaches • Licensed vaccines/antibiotics Vaccine • Passive surveillance Challenges • Contact tracing • Quarantine • Vaccines for unmet needs • Emerging viruses • Improving licensed vaccines 4 4 New Technologies are Transforming Vaccinology • Structure-based vaccine design Structural analysis of antigenic sites on viral • Single-cell sorting, sequencing, and bioinformatics surface glycoproteins – Rapid isolation of human mAbs Isolation of human monoclonal – Definition of antibody lineages antibodies from single B cells – Analysis of immune responses • Protein engineering of self-assembling nanoparticles • Rapid DNA synthesis • Recombinant
    [Show full text]
  • HIV?AIDS Researchers at the NIH Clinical Center
    The NIH Clinical Center treats a diverse group of patients from all over the world. It also draws researchers from different cultures and backgrounds. Learn more about some of the many researchers who conduct their work on the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) at the Clinical Center. Thomas C. Quinn, M.D., M.Sc., conducts research for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the NIH Clinical Center. He is a senior investigator and chief of the International HIV/STD Section of the Laboratory of Immunoregulation. Dr. Quinn obtained his M.D. from Northwestern University. He was a research associate in infectious diseases in the NIAID Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases and completed a fellowship in infectious diseases at the University of Washington. Since 1981, he has been assigned to the division of infectious diseases at Johns Hopkins University, where he became a professor of medicine in 1991. Dr. Quinn is a member of the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences and is a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. His major areas of research are: Definition of epidemiologic features of HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections in developing countries and the United States Assessment of biomedical interventions to control HIV, including circumcision, prevention of mother-to-child transmission, pre-exposure prophylaxis, and vaccine development Assessment of the frequency of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in selected populations using noninvasive sensitive nucleic-acid amplification assays for diagnosis Evaluations of interventions to control blinding trachoma due to Chlamydia trachomatis in sub-Saharan Africa See the full program description.
    [Show full text]
  • Kizzmekia S. Corbett
    KIZZMEKIA S. CORBETT, PHD Senior Research Fellow National Institutes of Health | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases | Vaccine Research Center 40 Convent Drive, Building 40 - Room 2608, Bethesda MD 20892 [email protected] | phone: 301.761.7610 | fax: 301.480.2771 EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy in Microbiology and Immunology 2014 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Director’s Scholar Bachelor of Science in Biological Sciences | Secondary Major in Sociology 2008 University of Maryland – Baltimore County (UMBC) Robert and Jane Meyerhoff Scholar RESEARCH EXPERIENCE Research Fellow 10/14 - present National Institutes of Health | Vaccine Research Center | PI: Barney S. Graham, MD PhD Research Interest: mechanisms of viral immunity to inform influenza and coronavirus vaccine development Graduate Research Assistant 08/09 – 10/14 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Microbiology and Immunology | PI: Aravinda de Silva, MPH PhD Research Interest: human antibody responses to dengue virus infection Visiting Scholar 04/14 – 05/14 Genetech Research Institute | PI: Aruna Dharshan de Silva, PhD Research Interest: immunological relevance of dengue virion maturation Postbaccalaureate Research Fellow 05/08 – 08/09 National Institutes of Health | Vaccine Research Center | PI: Barney S. Graham, MD PhD Research Interest: novel vaccine platform design for respiratory syncytial virus antigens NIH Undergraduate Scholarship Program Summer Intern 06/07 – 08/07 National Institutes of Health | Vaccine Research Center
    [Show full text]
  • That Record-Breaking Sprint to Create a COVID-19 Vaccine The
    NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH • OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR | VOLUME 29 ISSUE 5 • SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2021 That Record-breaking The Intersection of Man and Machine Sprint to Create a Bionics Gives New Hope to Those Living With Physical Disabilities COVID-19 Vaccine BY MICHAEL TABASKO, OD BY MELISSA GLIM At the end of 2019, most people were looking forward to an exciting 2020, a new decade starting with those magic numbers, 20-20, that denote a sharpness of vision. There would be the Summer Olympics in Japan and the U.S. presidential election. Meanwhile, intramural scientists at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ Vaccine Research Center (VRC) were designing vaccines for several coronaviruses using a promising, new platform based on messenger RNA (mRNA). Everything changed on a Saturday morning in early January. Chinese scientists CREDIT: TH0MAS BULEA (LEFT); NIH CLINCAL CENTER (RICHT) had isolated a new coronavirus that was (Left) The NIH pediatric exoskeleton for children with cerebral palsy and other movement disorders uses custom actuators causing a serious epidemic in China’s Wuhan from Agilik developed as part of a cooperative research and development agreement with NIH, along with embedded sensors and microcontrollers, to provide overground gait training while worn. (Right) Alexander Theodorakos, a participant province and released its genetic sequence to in a research protocol at the NIH Clinical Center that is evaluating the new pediatric exoskeleton, and Thomas Bulea, the the scientific community around the world. study’s principal investigator, discuss how the device changes the way the legs move when walking. Barney Graham, director of the VRC’s Viral Pathogenesis Laboratory (VPL), and If popular culture is any indication, the notion that bionic technology will VRC research fellow Kizzmekia Corbett someday redefine the boundaries of human function has long held our collective dropped everything and began using this fascination.
    [Show full text]
  • Nci-Plan-2013.Pdf
    THE NATIONAL CANCER PROGRAM MANAGING THE NATION’S RESEARCH PORTFOLIO AN ANNUAL PLAN AND BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 National Cancer Institute U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Contents 1 Foreword 4 Provocative Questions 8 Center for Cancer Genomics 16 Introduction to Cancer Profiles 18 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma 22 Colorectal Cancer 26 B-Cell Lymphoma 30 Renal Cell (Kidney) Cancer 34 GI Stromal Cancer 39 Research Focus: Comorbidities 42 Research Focus: Circulating Tumor Cells 44 Research Focus: Reducing Cancer Health Disparities 50 The Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research 61 Small Business Innovation Research, Small BusinessTechnology Transfer (SBIR, STTR) 66 NCI Center for Global Health 72 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers 83 Glossary of Terms 84 Budget FOREWORD The National Cancer Program MANAGING THE NATION’S RESEARCH PORTFOLIO his year marks the 75th anniversary of the founding of the National Cancer Institute, the first so-called “categorical institute” of what has become the National Institutes of Health, with its 27 Institutes and Centers. Over the years, the Congress and the public have generously supported the TNCI—and the NIH generally—with sustained budgetary increases. This was especially true for the NCI during the rapid expansion of its budget following the National Cancer Act of 1971 and for the NIH, including the NCI, during the 5-year doubling of its budget, launched in 1998. Both of these eras of rapid growth were remarkably fruitful. The first launched the pursuit of cancer genes and the molecular basis of oncogenesis, laying the foundation for the transformation of clinical oncology that is now occurring.
    [Show full text]
  • NIHAA Update 1Velco111es Lerters and Eastern Europe and at the Undergradu­ 1968, a Period of Considerable Growth News from Its Readers
    The Newsletter of the L NIH Alumni Association Summer 1999 Vol. 11, No. 2 date NIHAA Members Enjoy June Annual Meeting with Henney, Morella Alumni attendi ng the 1999 annual meeting of the NIH.AA were given a first-band briefing on FDA by Dr. Jane E. Henney, the receml y appointed FDA commissioner. Tbe audience also participated in a question and answer exchange witb Rep. Constance A. Morella (R-Md.), who was presented with tbe NIHAA 1999 Public Service Award. Almost I00 alumni attended the June 12 morning meeting at the Mary Woodard Lasker Center on the NIH campus. Henney, wbo was NCI deputy director for five of her lO years at NIH (1985-1995) spoke infonnalJy on some of FDA's principal concerns at this time: the agency's efforts to speed Shown at the NIHAA annual meeting are (from I} NIH alumna Dr. Jane E. Henney, FDA up review without sacrifice of quality commissioner, who spoke on "Back Home Again via Indiana, Kansas and New Mexico," and safeguards; tbe need for recruiting Dr. John F. Sherman, Rep. Constance A. Morella (R-Md.), who received the 1999 NIHAA Public Service Award, and Dr. William S. Jordan, Jr., outgoing NIHAA president. (see A flflual Meeting, p. 12) Director's Advisors Bat 6 for 7 in June Meeting In This Issue Page Choppin To Give Third Research Festival '99 J By Rich McManus NIHAA Shannon Lecture Ca/e11dar 5 The scorecard at the end of a daylong Dr. Purnell W. Cboppin, president of .News .from a11d about Nlf/A;/ me111be1:r (f session of lhe advisory committee to the Howard Hughes Medical lnstirure, the NIH director (ACD) on June 3 read A le11erjro1111he 11e111 Nlf/AIJ preside111 IO will deliver the third James A.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Protocol, Including Amendment
    Document Type: Study Protocol, including Amendment (Informed Consent Template located in Appendix I of the Protocol Version 1.0 and Version 2.0) Official Title: A Phase I, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Human Monoclonal Antibody, VRC-EBOMAB092-00-AB (MAb114), Administered Intravenously to Healthy Adults NCT Number: NCT03478891 Document/Date: Protocol Amendment Version 2.0: April 6, 2018 Protocol Version 1.0: February 21, 2018 Version 2.0 April 6, 2018 VACCINE RESEARCH CENTER Protocol VRC 608 (NIH 18-I-0069) A PHASE I, OPEN-LABEL, DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF A HUMAN MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY, VRC-EBOMAB092-00-AB (MAB114), ADMINISTERED INTRAVENOUSLY TO HEALTHY ADULTS Study Product Provided by: Vaccine Research Center (VRC) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) National Institutes of Health (NIH) Bethesda, MD Clinical Trial Sponsored by: NIAID/VRC/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland IND 138,090 Sponsored by: VRC/NIAID/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland Principal Investigator: Martin Gaudinski, MD VRC/NIAID/NIH Bethesda, MD 20892 IRB Initial Review Date: January 8, 2018 PRODUCT: VRC-EBOMAB092-00-AB (MAb114) PROTOCOL: VRC 608, VERSION 2.0 PROTOCOL DATE: APRIL 6, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................................................... 5 PRÉCIS.......................................................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • See the Vaccine Research Center Brochure
    Vaccine Research Center NIAID National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Letter from John R. Mascola, M.D., NIAID Vaccine Research Center Director, and Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., NIAID Director The Dale and Betty Bumpers Vaccine Research Center (VRC) was created by Presidential Executive Order in 1997 to accelerate the development of a vaccine directed against the devastating global pandemic caused by HIV. The VRC began its vital HIV work in 2000 and has since further expanded its scope and capabilities to combat other high-burden diseases such as influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), malaria, and tuberculosis, as well as biodefense threats and emerging infectious diseases, including Ebola, chikungunya, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), West Nile, and Zika. As an intramural research arm of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), the VRC is led by an integrated team of specialists in various disciplines, including immunology, virology, structural biology, and bioengineering. By encompassing these scientific disciplines under one roof, together with the capability to conduct human clinical trials, the VRC accelerates the process of scientific discovery leading to the design and development of prototype vaccines and biologics to protect against infectious diseases. The VRC operates as the closest analog at NIH to a private
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Consultation on Zika Virus Vaccine Development
    World Health Organization and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health Scientific Consultation on Zika Virus Vaccine Development January 10–11, 2017 5601 Fishers Lane Rockville, Maryland Meeting Summary Tuesday, January 10, 2017 INTRODUCTION Anthony S. Fauci, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the World Health Organization (WHO) convened the Scientific Consultation on Zika Virus Vaccine Development to discuss challenges and recent advances in the development of Zika virus (ZIKV) vaccines. The NIAID Director opened the meeting by stating that the recent spread of ZIKV mirrors that of other emerging arboviruses in the Americas in the past several years, including chikungunya, West Nile, and dengue. The NIAID research response to Zika builds on those experiences. A primary goal of this research is to develop medical countermeasures including diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines. Challenges specific to the development of a Zika vaccine include: the lack of adequate animal models; uncertainties in the epidemiology, which affect clinical trial site selection; the likelihood that the vaccine will need to induce sterilizing immunity to prevent congenital Zika syndrome (CZS); preexisting immunity to other flaviviruses in some regions; and potential specific risks such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and the administration of live vaccines to pregnant women. Several Zika vaccine candidates are being developed with different development timelines and likely target populations. The planned timelines include large, well-controlled clinical trials to evaluate safety and efficacy, and if successful, subsequent licensure; should public health need and available safety and efficacy data justify deployment of vaccine before licensure, access through appropriate regulatory mechanisms could be considered.
    [Show full text]