DOCSLIB.ORG

York Law Review Vol. 2, Spring 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
York Law Review Vol. 2, Spring 2021 York Law School — University of York ________________________ THE YORK LAW REVIEW ________________________ VOLUME II SPRING 2021 EDITORIAL BOARD VOLUME II Editor-in-Chief Carl Makin Deputy Editor-in-Chief Sam Guy Senior Editors Alice Trotter Jessica Gracie Junior Editors Megan Hurcombe Samuel Kuo Editorial Board Members Professor Caroline Hunter Dr Sue Westwood Dr Jed Meers Martin Philip Copyright © the authors, 2021. Permission granted to reproduce for personal and educational use only. Commercial copying, hiring, and lending is prohibited. FOREWORD by Professor Caroline Hunter Head of York Law School It gives me great pleasure to provide this Foreword to the second volume of the York Law Review. I do so in a time of uncertainty and change. Uncertainty because of COVID pandemic. is has clearly meant different ways of working and learning in the last 18 months. I want to congratulate the student editors in publishing this volume in such difficult circumstances. e team has been expanded this year , and no doubt that has helped, but it brings its own challenges as meetings are moved on-line and quick chats have to the scheduled. Beyond the editorial team, COVID has brought changes to University teaching and learning. For much of 2020–21 the Law School's teaching has been entirely on-line. One of the defining elements of York Law School is the use of problem-based learning (PBL) for all of our undergraduate core modules — the question posed by COVID was whether we could translate that form of learning into the virtual classroom. It is lovely to read Fraser King's article — ‘It's Not All Zoom and Gloom: Reflections of University Study during COVID-19’ — reflecting on his experience as both an LLM student and a graduate teaching assistant. e pandemic has brought huge legal changes both in the UK and across the world. In line with the Law School's research focus on socially engaged research, members of staff at the School has been involved in different projects probing COVID and the effects of the law for the public, particularly the vulnerable in our society. at will be published in the next few months. is volume came too early for our stu dents to write in their dissertations about the legal changes that COVID has brought. However, I look forward to dissertations on the topic this year and in future years and I hope some will find their way into the Review in future volumes. I am sure some will come from our LLM students, particularly from our students based in the Centre for Applied Human Rights (CAHR) taking the LLM in International Human Rights Law and Practice. I am very pleased that this volume includes more from our LLM students than the first. e timing for our taught post -graduate dissertation did not allow for any to be included in that volume. is second volume has enabled a number of these to be showcased, including the empirical projects undertaken by students at CAHR. Another change this year is more personal. is is the last Foreword I will write as Head of School as my term of office ends in September. I know that the School is in great hands with my successor Professor TT Arvind. Over the eight years of my term of office the School has grown hugely. In 2013 we had 376 LLB and 16 LLM students, this undergraduate number has now more than doubled to 724 and the LLM numbers are five times bigger at 70 students. Growth is challenging but it allows the School to invest in student projects like the Review. It also challenges us to consider how our values can be maintained. In the first Foreword to the Review I commented that: e starting principle in our culture is that YLS is a learning community in which staff and students are active participants. e Review is new venture that reflects this culture: it is a collaboration between students and staff and shows the active learning of our students particularly the research that goes into a dissertation. is volume continues to demonstrate that core value of the Law School. I have every reason to believe that like the School, the Review will continue to grow and flourish in the hands of our students. Caroline Hunter June 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS YORK LAW REVIEW VOLUME II EDITORIAL: PUBLISHING IN THE ‘NEW 1 NORMAL’ Carl Makin and Sam Guy UNDERSTANDING JONESTOWN: THE 6 CRIMINAL LIABILITIES OF THE PORT KAITUMA AIRSTRIP SHOOTING AND JONESTOWN MASSACRE Charlie Tye LESSONS UNLEARNED: BLOODY SUNDAY AND 42 THE CONDUCT OF BRITISH ARMED FORCES IN CONFLICT Amy Maria Butler LEGITIMISING BIOPIRACY? FAIRNESS AND 75 EFFICACY OF THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL Dominic Querée Hodnett THE TRUTH WITHIN OUR ROOTS: EXPLORING 107 HAIR DISCRIMINATION AND PROFESSIONAL GROOMING POLICIES IN THE CONTEXT OF EQUALITY LAW Stephanie Cohen BLOWING THE WHISTLE ON THE IRAQ WAR: 123 CONSCIENTIOUS MORAL OBJECTION AND THE DUTY TO OBEY THE LAW Laura Burke DWORKIN'S GIFT TO CONSTITUTIONAL 153 JURISPRUDENCE: JUSTIFYING THE MORAL READING OF THE US CONSTITUTION Max Williams A GAME OF THRONES: THE BATTLE FOR THE 191 SUPREMACY OF EU LAW FOLLOWING WEISS II Jakub Kozlowski IT'S NOT ALL ZOOM AND GLOOM: 204 REFLECTIONS ON UNIVERSITY STUDY DURING COVID–19 Fraser King "THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT US": 215 ANALYSING PATRIARCHY AND THE WORK OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS IN NIGERIA Nabila Okino MECHANISMS USED TO TRANSLATE THE 250 INTERNATIONAL PROHIBITION ON CHILD RECRUITMENT TO ARMED NON-STATE ACTORS IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO Ella Allen EDITORIAL: PUBLISHING IN THE ‘NEW NORMAL’ Carl Makin and Sam Guy For everyone, the past year has been incredibly challenging. e COVID-19 pandemic has had wide-ranging effects and has exacerbated existing societal injustices and inequalities. It has also brought with it radical implications for the workplace, many of which will surely be grappled with and developed long after the pandemic has passed. Invariably, this context has brought with it many difficulties for the operation of the York Law Review, particularly given that, having been established in 2019, it is so nascent in form. Despite – and, indeed, especially in light of – these unique challenges, it gives us great pleasure to introduce the second volume of the Review. is volume shows the development of the journal, as we move from our inaugural volume to this second and indeed more mature collection of papers. e volume goes further to showcase the variety of scholarship undertaken and taught at the York Law School. It exhibits how the School is not only pedagogically innovative, but that its methodologically diverse staff pass on their skills and expertise to students in a way which sponsors and encourages an equally diverse level of scholarship within the student body. is volume can be neatly divided into two halves. e first seven pieces are doctrinal and theoretical in nature. ey examine and analyse a wide variety of legal fields – from criminal culpability in cult environments to international protocols on the patenting of traditional knowledge relating to plants where this can be used for medicinal or other commercial purposes. In interrogating this wide field of subjects, the papers presented in this volume go beyond simply ordering our understanding of law and legal provisions. Instead, they often 2 York Law Review problematise and challenge the extant provisions. Some, such as Amy Butler’s piece on the Overseas Operations Act, do so through historicism and deploy historical happenings as a challenge to current thinking. Comparably, Stephanie Cohen’s piece on hair discrimination deploys both an element of historicism and a racial lens to argue that notions of ‘ideal hair’ are perpetuated in the professional world through institutional policies and are inadequately dealt with in equalities legislation. e latter paper was the chosen submission from our postgraduate essay competition, which asked students from across the York Law School’s postgraduate taught programmes to discuss a recent development in the law. In the parallel competition for undergraduate students, Jakub Kozlowski’ s paper was selected. is piece examines the contentious decision in Weiss II , where Germany’s national Federal Constitutional Court declared a preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union invalid. Jakub situates the judgment within a growing trend whereby Member States have felt increasingly empowered to disregard EU law when it conflicts with national agendas, in contravention of the long-established concept of the supremacy of EU law, and suggests that this may set a dangerous precedent in light of States such as Poland and Hungary facing internal rule of law crises. Both Stephanie’s and Jakub’s respective papers exemplify the vision for the competitions process, showcasing the capacity of the Law School’s student body to engage with the multifaceted role of law in pressing social issues. Some of our papers, such as Laura Burke’s piece on conscientious moral objection and the Iraq war, draw on theoretical and philosophical arguments to deal with contemporary issues – in this case, the question of whether Katharine Gun, the former Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) linguist, could be prosecuted under the Official Secrets Ac t 1989. e popular importance of these issues is evident in the fact that the saga was turned into a film, Official Secrets (2019) starring Keira Knightley. Laura’s work here tackles the tension between legal obedience and moral obligation. In a similar vein, Max Williams’ piece provides an engaging examination of Dworkin's moral reading of Volume — Spring 2021 3 the United States Constitution. rough a thorough treatment of three scholars’ criticism of Dworkin’s work, Max convincingly argues that Dworkin’s approach maintains fidelity to the Constitution’s text whilst also protecting minority rights and democratic interests.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • They Hate US for Our War Crimes: an Argument for US Ratification of the Rome Statute in Light of the Post-Human Rights
    UIC Law Review Volume 52 Issue 4 Article 4 2019 They Hate U.S. for Our War Crimes: An Argument for U.S. Ratification of the Rome Statute in Light of the ost-HumanP Rights Era, 53 UIC J. MARSHALL. L. REV. 1011 (2019) Michael Drake Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Michael Drake, They Hate U.S. for Our War Crimes: An Argument for U.S. Ratification of the Rome Statute in Light of the Post-Human Rights Era, 53 UIC J. MARSHALL. L. REV. 1011 (2019) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol52/iss4/4 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THEY HATE U.S. FOR OUR WAR CRIMES: AN ARGUMENT FOR U.S. RATIFICATION OF THE ROME STATUTE IN LIGHT OF THE POST-HUMAN RIGHTS ERA MICHAEL DRAKE* I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 1012 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................ 1014 A. Continental Disparities ......................................... 1014 1. The International Process in Africa ............... 1014 2. The National Process in the United States of America ............................................................ 1016 B. The Rome Statute, the ICC, and the United States ................................................................................. 1020 1. An International Court to Hold National Leaders Accountable ...................................................... 1020 2. The Aims and Objectives of the Rome Statute .......................................................................... 1021 3. African Bias and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Some New This No Longer Is an Adequate Description
    Volume 6 October 2013 Green industry in a post-industrial society www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu Contents 1. MAJOR: GREEN INDUSTRY IN A POST-INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY 3 From the green industrial revolution to the ecological revolution 3 Editorial Board – Benoît Lechat ‘Make Do and Mend’: industrial conversions and sustainability transitions 7 Molly Scott Cato and Jonathan Essex European industry needs to RISE! 13 Reinhard Butikofer Black tradition, green future 18 Adam Ostolski The aspirations of the green industrial revolution: a historical perspective 22 Patrick Verley – Damien Demailly Towards a Green renaissance of European industry 32 Natalie Bennett – Reinhard Bütikofer Government procurement: how the EU is giving away a fundamental industrial policy tool 41 Chiara Miglioli Cities as Eco-factories of the Future 47 Dirk Holemans Industry meets Green Economy: real potential for reconversion 55 Andrea Gandiglio II. MINOR: TOWARDS A GREEN WELFARE STATE 57 A sustainable welfare state 57 Jasper Blom Europe of Knowledge: Paradoxes and Challenges 63 Jana Bacevic 1. MAJOR: GREEN INDUSTRY IN A POST-INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY From the green industrial revolution Benoît Lechat to the ecological revolution Greening industry is crucial to our ability to combat climate change and maintain a prosperous society. But to achieve this, we need a whole new relationship with the environment. Food: the (agri)cultural revolution By the end of the seventies, many European Green Broader than measures of carbon intensity, the parties were created to counter the negative statistics on the Total Material Requirement (TMR) of consequences of industrialisation on the environment the EU take into account all material flows generated and on people.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pit and the Pendulum: a Cooperative Future for Work in The
    Pit and the Pendulum Prelims.qxd 02/03/04 13:34 Page i POLITICS AND SOCIETY IN WALES The Pit and the Pendulum Pit and the Pendulum Prelims.qxd 02/03/04 13:34 Page ii POLITICS AND SOCIETY IN WALES SERIES Series editor: Ralph Fevre Previous volumes in the series: Paul Chaney, Tom Hall and Andrew Pithouse (eds), New Governance – New Democracy? Post-Devolution Wales Neil Selwyn and Stephen Gorard, The Information Age: Technology, Learning and Exclusion in Wales Graham Day, Making Sense of Wales: A Sociological Perspective Richard Rawlings, Delineating Wales: Constitutional, Legal and Administrative Aspects of National Devolution The Politics and Society in Wales Series examines issues of politics and government, and particularly the effects of devolution on policy-making and implementation, and the way in which Wales is governed as the National Assembly gains in maturity. It will also increase our knowledge and understanding of Welsh society and analyse the most important aspects of social and economic change in Wales. Where necessary, studies in the series will incorporate strong comparative elements which will allow a more fully informed appraisal of the condition of Wales. Pit and the Pendulum Prelims.qxd 02/03/04 13:34 Page iii POLITICS AND SOCIETY IN WALES The Pit and the Pendulum A COOPERATIVE FUTURE FOR WORK IN THE WELSH VALLEYS By MOLLY SCOTT CATO Published on behalf of the Social Science Committee of the Board of Celtic Studies of the University of Wales UNIVERSITY OF WALES PRESS CARDIFF 2004 Pit and the Pendulum Prelims.qxd 04/03/04 16:01 Page iv © Molly Scott Cato, 2004 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
    [Show full text]
  • LGA and ALDC at the Liberal Democrat Virtual Autumn Conference
    LGA and ALDC at the Liberal Democrat Virtual Autumn Conference Friday 25 September How can we revive our town centres? How can we help our town centres recover and what are the challenges? 5pm – 5.50pm Speakers include: Tim Farron, MP Councillor Emily Smith, Leader, Vale of White Horse DC Elected Mayor Dave Hodgson, Bedford Borough Council Kirsten Henly, ’Kingston First’ Business Improvement District Chair: Councillor Heather Kidd, Chair, LGA Liberal Democrat Group Saturday 26 September Working in coalition in local government – From York to Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole What are the challenges and successes in working with other parties to run our councils? 9am – 9.50am Speakers include: Councillor Keith Aspden, Leader, City of York Councillor Darryl Smalley, City of York Councillor Vikki Slade, Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole Council Chair: Councillor Alan Connett, Chief Whip, LGA Liberal Democrat Group Stop the power grab: How to oppose the government’s meddling in our planning system while delivering the homes we need 1pm – 1.50pm Speakers include: Sir Ed Davey MP, Leader of the Liberal Democrats Councillor Tumi Hawkins, South Cambridgeshire DC Baroness Olly Grender, Liberal Democrat Housing Spokesperson, House of Lords Giddon Amos, Former Chief Executive Town and Planning Association Chair: Councillor Howard Sykes, Leader, LGA Liberal Democrats Sunday 27 September You’ve declared a climate emergency, what next? Hear what steps Liberal Democrat Councils are taking 1pm – 1.50pm Speakers include: Wera Hobhouse MP Victoria Marsom,
    [Show full text]
  • For More Information on What Demos Has Been up to in 2019, and Our Plans
    2O19 Tom Watson MP, giving A YEAR OF GROWTH a speech on gambling regulation Demos exists to bring people and politics Because we listen to people, and engage July 2019 closer together. At a time of great division, without prejudice to party lines, we design upheaval and outrage, we believe Britain can policies that can bring people together. rise to all the challenges facing us if we find a From tax to teaching, from care to consumer way to hold together. That means we need to protection: we champion ideas that can give do politics - and policy - very differently. all our citizens more power in their everyday lives. We’re not like other think tanks. We don’t lock ourselves up in Westminster and come Demos has always been a hub for innovation. up with solutions on our own. Everything we We get technology in a way that most in recommend has been co-designed with the Westminster do not. As technology upends citizens we work for: the people of Britain. our society, our economy and our politics, those skills are proving more vital than ever 2019 has been a year of huge growth - we’re before. nearly twice the size we were when I took over less than two years ago. With a team I’m incredibly excited about what 2020 of twenty, we’ve engaged with thousands of holds. We will be doing our own polling and citizens up and down the country, through public opinion research. We’ll be launching Rt Hon Nicky Morgan polling, focus groups, social media and new tools for online deliberation.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL AGENDA AUTUMN ONLINE CONFERENCE 2-11 October 2020
    FINAL AGENDA AUTUMN ONLINE CONFERENCE 2-11 October 2020 9 1 CONTENTS Table of Contents 2 Section A (Enabling Motions) 10 Enabling Motions A01 Standing Orders Committee (SOC) Report 10 Enabling Motions A02 Amendments to Standing Orders for the Conduct of Conference 11 to enable an online and telephone Extraordinary Conference to be held in Autumn 2020 Enabling Motions A03 Enabling Motion for an Extraordinary Autumn Conference 2020 12 to be held online Section A – Main Agenda 14 A1 Standing Orders Committee Report 14 A2 Green Party Executive Report 37 A3 Treasurers Report 46 A4 Green Party Regional Council Report 47 A5 Dispute Resolution Committee Report 50 A6 Policy Development Committee Report 54 A7 Complaint Managers Report 57 A8 Campaigns Committee Report 58 A9 Conferences Committee Report 58 A10 Equality and Diversity Committee Report 58 A11 Green World Editorial Board Report 58 A12 Framework Development Group report 58 A13 Climate Emergency Policy Working Group Report 58 Section B 60 B1 Food and Agriculture Voting Paper 60 Amendment 2a 60 Amendment 1a 61 Amendment 2b 61 Amendment 1b 61 Amendment 1c 62 Amendment 1d 62 Amendment 2c 64 2 3 Section C 65 C1 Deforestation (Fast Tracked) 65 C2 Car and vans to go zero carbon by 2030 65 C3 Ban on advertising of high-carbon goods and services 65 C4 The 2019 General Election Manifesto and Climate Change Mitigation 66 Amendment 1 67 Amendment 2 67 C5 Adopt the Principle of Rationing to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Arising from Travel, 67 Amending the Climate Emergency and the Transport Chapters of PSS C6 Updating the philosophical basis to reflect doughnut economics 68 Amendment 1 69 C7 Self Declaration of Gender 69 C8 Animal Rights: Fireworks; limit use and quiet 70 C9 Access to Fertility Treatment 70 Section D 71 D1 Winning over workers is crucial to fighting climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Theory, Policy and Practice Green Economics
    Dorling, D. (2009) Review of Molly Scott Cato’s: Green economics: an introduction to theory, policy and practice, Journal of Economic Geography, doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp028 Green economics: an introduction to theory, policy and practice Molly Scott Cato Green economics: an introduction to theory, policy and practice Molly Scott Cato. London: Earthscan, 2009. ISBN 9781844075713. pp. Price: £19.99 (paper back), £75.00 (hard back). Do you want to be liked? Do you want to be popular? Are you a little tired of students evaluating your courses in economic geography, spatial econometrics or most other kinds of human geography, and all of economics as, by implication, a little boring, not quite at the cutting edge, not as good as what the new young—popular—lecturers are doing? Do you retort ‘what do they know?’ but in your heart of hearts are coming to think that perhaps your lectures are getting a little jaded on ‘location allocation models’, ‘regional convergence’ or even ‘thick institutions’ (and I do not mean the stupid kind). Are you becoming a little sick of telling students that it's all very complicated and everything needs to be deconstructed? In your heart of hearts (again) do not you hanker after being able to tell them something that is a little less self-defeating? You might just be worried about your job now that university funding in all the countries where geography is taught is about to go negative. You might no longer care, but you know you need to become a little more popular. Alternatively you may be ever so principled, take your teaching ever so seriously, not concern yourself with student surveys but still be interested in trying to teach the students right, no matter how complicated the story.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary
    Thursday Volume 664 26 September 2019 No. 343 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 26 September 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 843 26 SEPTEMBER 2019 Speaker’s Statement 844 there will be an urgent question later today on the House of Commons matter to which I have just referred, and that will be an opportunity for colleagues to say what they think. This is something of concern across the House. It is Thursday 26 September 2019 not a party political matter and, certainly as far as I am concerned, it should not be in any way, at any time, to any degree a matter for partisan point scoring. It is The House met at half-past Nine o’clock about something bigger than an individual, an individual party or an individual political or ideological viewpoint. Let us treat of it on that basis. In the meantime, may I just ask colleagues—that is all I am doing and all I can PRAYERS do as your representative in the Chair—please to lower the decibel level and to try to treat each other as opponents, not as enemies? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Con): On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Speaker’s Statement Mr Speaker: Order. I genuinely am not convinced, but I will take one point of order if the hon. Gentleman Mr Speaker: Before we get under way with today’s insists.
    [Show full text]
  • De Gavin Hood Siguiendo El Mejor Estilo De Cine Británico, Es
    (2003) y establecer vínculos inexistentes con Al-Qaeda, para permitir que EE UU completara su venganza tras el 11-S. La trama, inspirada en el libro The Spy Who Tried to Stop War, de Marcia y Thomas Michel, gira en torno a la figura verídica de Katherine Gun (una estupenda y siempre eficaz Keira Knightley), quien trabaja como traductora en el GCHQ (Cuartel General de Comunicaciones del Gobierno Británico), vinculado al MI6. En una de las comunicaciones internas se requiere a los agentes que saquen los trapos sucios de políticos de ciertos países para poder presionarles y hacer decantar su voto en favor de la guerra. Consecuentemente, Katherine entiende enseguida que el Gobierno británico de Tony Blair es cómplice de una La ciudadanía activa y responsable maniobra ilegal en favor de los EE UU. en Secretos de Estado (2019), de Y la joven traductora, a pesar del riesgo, Gavin Hood a través de una amiga pacifista, buscará filtrar la noticia a los medios para Por IGOR BARRENETXEA MARAÑÓN impedir la guerra. Pero su valiente e inútil gesto viola el Acta de Secretos oficiales. Un Acta que considera Siguiendo el mejor estilo de cine traición cualquier información que salga británico, este filme reúne todos los a la luz si es sensible a los intereses del excelentes ingredientes de la Gobierno de turno. cinematografía de espías al estilo John Destilando el viejo aroma del Le Carré… pero, sobre todo, thriller político, entre la brillante La recordando más al cine de denuncia Casa Rusia (1989) y Los papeles del política y comprometido de Costa- Pentágono (2017), Secretos de Estado Gavras.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory Liberal Democrats Autumn Conference Bournemouth 14–17 September 2019
    DIRECTORY LIBERAL DEMOCRATS AUTUMN CONFERENCE BOURNEMOUTH 14–17 SEPTEMBER 2019 Clear Print This clear print / large text version of the Conference Directory matches as closely as possible the text of the published Directory. Page number cross references are correct within this clear print document. Some information may appear in a different place from its location in the published Directory. Complex layouts and graphics have been omitted. It is black and white omn A4 pages for ease of printing. The Agenda and Directory and other conference publications, in PDF, plain text and clear print formats, are available online at www.libdems.org.uk/conference_papers Page 1 Directory Liberal Democrats Autumn Conference 2019 Clearprint Welcome to the Liberal Democrat 2019 conference Directory. If you have any questions whilst at conference please ask a conference steward or go to the Information Desk on the ground floor of the Bournemouth International Centre. Conference venue Bournemouth International Centre (BIC) Exeter Road, Bournemouth, BH2 5BH. Please note that the BIC is within the secure zone and that access is only possible with a valid conference pass. Conference hotel Bournemouth Highcliff Marriott St Michael’s Rd, West Cliff, Bournemouth, BH2 5DU. Further information, registration and conference publications (including plain text and clear print versions) are available at: www.libdems.org.uk/conference For information about the main auditorium sessions, see the separate conference Agenda. DEMAND BETTER THAN BREXIT Page 2 Directory Liberal Democrats Autumn Conference 2019 Clearprint Contents Feature . 4–5 Our time is now by Jo Swinson MP Conference information: . 6–13 Exhibition: . 14–26 List of exhibitors .
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Politics to Nuclear New Build
    Grimston Nuclear Report_Cover_A4 1/12/05 10:34 am Page 1 ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME THE IMPORTANCE OF POLITICS TO NUCLEAR NEW BUILD Malcolm Grimston December 2005 The Importance of Politics to Nuclear New Build An examination of the relationship between political, scientific and public mindsets and its influence on decision-making in the scientific and technical field Malcolm Grimston REPORT December 2005 Chatham House Report – The importance of politics to nuclear new build © Royal Institute of International Affairs 2005 Published by The Royal Institute of International Affairs Chatham House 10 St James’s Square London SW1Y 4LE www.chathamhouse.org.uk (Charity Registration No. 208 223) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any other means without the prior permission of the copyright holders. Please direct all enquiries to the publisher. Chatham House (the Royal Institute of International Affairs) is an independent body which promotes the rigorous study of international questions and does not express opinions of its own. The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the authors. Chatham House Report – The importance of politics to nuclear new build ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My thanks to the many colleagues who have commented on various drafts of this paper, helping to clarify my thinking and put me in contact with materials I would otherwise have missed. They include: Jean-Paul Bouttes, EdF; Adrian Bull, BNFL; Dr Vincent Cable MP, House of Commons, London; Dominique Chauvin, Total; Rob Davies, Areva Framatome; Andrei Gagarinski, Kurchatov Institute, Moscow; Darren McGarry, European Commission; Mark Penfold; Isabelle Philippe, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (CEA), France; Assaad Saab, EdF; Richard Tarasofsky, Chatham House and Andrew Teller, Foratom.
    [Show full text]