XMM-Newton Observation of the Northeastern Limb of the Cygnus Loop Supernova Remnant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

XMM-Newton Observation of the Northeastern Limb of the Cygnus Loop Supernova Remnant XMM-Newton Observation of the Northeastern Limb of the Cygnus Loop Supernova Remnant Norbert Nemes Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan 04 February 2005 Osaka University Abstract We have observed the northeastern limb of the Cygnus Loop supernova remnant with the XMM-Newton observatory, as part of a 7-pointing campaign to map the remnant across its diameter. We performed medium sensitivity spatially resolved X-ray spectroscopy on the data in the 0.3-3.0 keV energy range, and for the first time we have detected C emission lines in our spectra. The background subtracted spectra were fitted with a single temperature absorbed non-equilibrium (VNEI) model. We created color maps and plotted the radial variation of the different parameters. We found that the heavy element abundances were depleted, but increase toward the edge of the remnant, exhibiting a jump structure near the northeastern edge of the field of view. The depletion suggests that the plasma in this region represents the shock heated ISM rather than the ejecta, while the radial increase of the elemental abundances seems to support the cavity explosion origin. The temperature decreases in the radial direction from 0:3keV to about 0:2keV , however, this ∼ ∼ decrease is not monotonic. There is a low temperature region in the part of the field of view closest to the center of the remnant, which is characterized by low abundances and high NH values. Another low temperature region characterized by low NH values but where the heavy element abundances suddenly jump to high values was found at the northeastern edge of the field of view. We theorize that these two regions could be interstellar clouds interacting with the blast wave. Contents 1 Supernovae and Supernova Remnants 1 1.1 Supernovae (SNe) . 1 1.1.1 Classification of Supernovae . 2 1.2 Supernova Remnants (SNRs) . 5 1.2.1 Classification of SNRs . 5 1.2.2 Shock Waves . 6 1.2.3 Evolution of SNRs . 7 1.2.4 The Interaction with Interstellar Clouds . 11 1.2.5 X-ray Emission from SNRs . 14 2 The Cygnus Loop 21 2.1 Radio Observations . 21 2.2 Optical Observations . 22 2.2.1 Depletion of Heavy Elements . 24 2.3 X-ray Observations . 24 3 XMM-Newton 28 3.1 The X-ray Telescopes . 28 3.1.1 X-ray Point-Spread Function . 30 3.1.2 X-ray Effective Area . 30 3.1.3 European Photon Imaging Camera (EPIC) . 30 3.1.4 Readout Modes . 33 3.1.5 EPIC Filters . 33 3.1.6 The EPIC Background . 36 4 Observation and Data Preparation 39 4.1 Observation . 39 4.2 Data Preparation . 39 i CONTENTS ii 5 Analysis 42 5.1 Image analysis . 42 5.2 Spectral analysis . 42 6 Results 50 6.1 Color maps and the radial variation of things . 50 6.1.1 Analysis II . 56 7 Discussion 61 8 Conclusions 67 List of Figures 1.1 The Sedov self-similar solution. Each value is normalized by each value just behind the shock wave. 10 1.2 The iron Kα emissivity (solid lines) and the emissivity-averaged line energy (dashed lines) as 3 −1 2 a function of Te and Tz. The unit of the emissivity are photons cm s /ne and the step is 0.2 in the log scale (Masai 1994)[29]. 18 1.3 Fe ion fractions . 20 1.4 Emissivity of each Fe ion . 20 1.5 The center energy of Fe-K line blends . 20 2.1 1420 MHz radio map of the Cygnus Loop (Leahy 1995) . 22 2.2 ROSAT X-ray map of the Cygnus Loop (ROSAT All Sky Survey) . 27 3.1 Sketch of the XMM-Newton payload. The mirror modules, two of which are equipped with Reflection Grating Arrays, are visible at the lower left. At the right end of the assembly, the focal X-ray instruments are shown: The EPIC MOS cameras with their radiators (black/green 'horns'), the radiator of the EPIC pn camera (violet) and those of the (light blue) RGS detectors (pink). The OM telescope is obscured by the lower mirror module. Figure courtesy of Dornier Satellitensysteme GmbH. 29 3.2 The light path in XMM-Newton's open X-ray telescope with the pn camera in focus (not to scale) . 30 3.3 The net effective area of all XMM-Newton X-ray telescopes . 31 3.4 The general layout of the MOS camera . 32 3.5 The general layout of the pn camera . 32 3.6 Operating modes of the MOS camera: full frame mode (top left), large window mode (top right), small window mode (bottom left) and timing mode (bottom right) . 34 3.7 Operating modes of the pn camera: full frame and extended full frame mode (top left), large window mode (top right), small window mode (bottom left) and timing mode (bottom right) 35 3.8 Combined effective area of all telescopes assuming that all cameras operate with the same filters 35 3.9 The lightcurve from a MOS1 observation badly affected by soft proton flares . 36 3.10 Background spectrum of the MOS1 camera. The prominent features around 1.5 and 1.7 keV are Al-K and Si-K fluorescence lines . 37 iii LIST OF FIGURES iv 3.11 Background spectrum of the pn camera. The prominent features around 1.5 are Al-K, at 5.5 keV Cr-K, at 8 keV Ni-K, Cu-K, Zn-K and at 17.5 keV Mo-K fluorescence lines. The rise of the spectrum below 0.3 keV are due to the detector noise. 37 3.12 Background image for the MOS camera in the Si-Kα energy range . 38 3.13 Background images for the pn camera with spatially inhomogeneous fluorescent lines: Ti+V+Cr- Kα (top-left), Nickel (7.3-7.6 keV) (top-right), Copper (7.8-8.2 keV)(bottom-left) and Molyb- denum (17.1-17.7 keV)(bottom-left) . 38 4.1 Lightcurves extracted from the event files before and after the GTI filtering. 40 5.1 Three-color image of the northeastern limb of the Cygnus Loop. The colors correspond to the following energy ranges: red - (0.3-0.75) keV, green - (0.75-12) keV, blue - (1.2-3.0) keV. The image has been smoothed with a 3σ gausian. North is up and west is to the right . 43 5.2 Source (black) and background (red) spectra of the MOS1 camera . 46 5.3 Source (black) and background (red) spectra of the MOS2 camera . 46 5.4 Source (black) and background (red) spectra of the pn camera . 46 5.5 Combined background subtracted spectrum of the entire FOV. 47 5.6 The regions selected for analysis superimposed on the X-ray surface brightness map. 47 5.7 The result of fitting the vmekal model (left) and the VNEI model (right) . 48 5.8 The spectra best fit (left) and worst fit (right) by our model . 49 6.1 The binning annuli overlayed onto the spectral selection regions. 51 6.2 The variation of kTe . 52 6.3 The radial variation of kTe . 52 6.4 The variation of C . 52 6.5 The radial variation of C . 52 6.6 The variation of O . 53 6.7 The radial variation of O . 53 6.8 The variation of Ne . 53 6.9 The radial variation of Ne . 53 6.10 The variation of Mg . 54 6.11 The radial variation of Mg . 54 6.12 The variation of Fe . 54 6.13 The radial variation of Fe . 54 6.14 The variation of log(net) . 55 6.15 The radial variation of log(net) . 55 6.16 The variation of NH . 56 6.17 The radial variation of NH . 56 6.18 The radial variation of the EI . 57 6.19 The spectral extraction regions used for the second analysis . 57 LIST OF FIGURES v 6.20 The kTe for each region . 58 6.21 The log(net) for each region . 58 6.22 The abundance of C in each region . 58 6.23 The abundance of O in each region . 58 6.24 The abundance of Ne in each region . 59 6.25 The abundance of Mg in each region . 59 6.26 The abundance of Si in each region . ..
Recommended publications
  • BRAS Newsletter August 2013
    www.brastro.org August 2013 Next meeting Aug 12th 7:00PM at the HRPO Dark Site Observing Dates: Primary on Aug. 3rd, Secondary on Aug. 10th Photo credit: Saturn taken on 20” OGS + Orion Starshoot - Ben Toman 1 What's in this issue: PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE....................................................................................................................3 NOTES FROM THE VICE PRESIDENT ............................................................................................4 MESSAGE FROM THE HRPO …....................................................................................................5 MONTHLY OBSERVING NOTES ....................................................................................................6 OUTREACH CHAIRPERSON’S NOTES .........................................................................................13 MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION .......................................................................................................14 2 PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE Hi Everyone, I hope you’ve been having a great Summer so far and had luck beating the heat as much as possible. The weather sure hasn’t been cooperative for observing, though! First I have a pretty cool announcement. Thanks to the efforts of club member Walt Cooney, there are 5 newly named asteroids in the sky. (53256) Sinitiere - Named for former BRAS Treasurer Bob Sinitiere (74439) Brenden - Named for founding member Craig Brenden (85878) Guzik - Named for LSU professor T. Greg Guzik (101722) Pursell - Named for founding member Wally Pursell
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of a Pulsar Wind Nebula Candidate in the Cygnus Loop
    Discovery of a Pulsar Wind Nebula Candidate in the Cygnus Loop 2 3 S Satoru Katsuda" Hiroshi Tsunemi , Koji Mori , Hiroyuki Uchida" Robert Petre , Shin'ya 1 Yamada , and Thru Tamagawa' ABSTRACT We report on a discovery of a diffuse nebula containing a pointlike source in the southern blowout region of the Cygnus Loop supernova remnant, based on Suzaku and XMM-Newton observations. The X-ray spectra from the nebula and the pointlike source are well represented by an absorbed power-law model with photon indices of 2.2±0.1 and 1.6±0.2, respectively. The photon indices as well as the flux ratio of F nebula/ F po;.,li" ~ 4 lead us to propose that the system is a pulsar wind nebula, although pulsations have not yet been detected. If we attribute its origin to the Cygnus Loop supernova, then the 0.5- 8 keY luminosity of the nebula is computed to be 2.1xlo"' (d/MOpc)2ergss-" where d is the distance to the Loop. This implies a spin-down loss-energy E ~ 2.6 X 1035 (d/MOpc)2ergss-'. The location of the neutron star candidate, ~2° away from the geometric center of the Loop, implies a high transverse velocity of ~ 1850(8/2D ) (d/540pc) (t/lOkyr)- ' kms-" assuming the currently accepted age of the Cygnus Loop. Subject headings: ISM: individual objects (Cygnus Loop) - ISM: supernova remnants - pulsars: general - stars: neutron - stars: winds, outflows - X-rays: ISM 'RlKEN (The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Sailama 351-0198 2Department of EaTth and Space Science, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Thyonaka, Osaka, 60-0043, Japan SDepartment of Applied Physics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen Klbana-dai Nishi, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan ' Department of PhysiCS, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwake-clto, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, J apan 'NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 662, Greenbelt MD 20771 - 2 - 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(MULTIF15)020 Al
    Suzaku Highlights of Supernova Remnants PoS(MULTIF15)020 Satoru Katsuda∗† Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Hiroshi Tsunemi Department of Earth and Space Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Suzaku was the Japanese 5th X-ray astronomy satellite operated from 2005 July 10 to 2015 Au- gust 26. Its key features are high-sensitivity wide-band X-ray spectroscopy available with both the X-ray imaging CCD cameras and the non-imaging collimated hard X-ray detector. A number of interesting scientific discoveries have been achieved in various fields. Among them, I will focus on results on supernova remnants. The topics in this paper include (1) revealing distributions of supernova ejecta, (2) establishing over-ionized plasmas by discoveries of radiative-recombination continua, (3) constraining progenitors of Type Ia SNRs from Mn/Cr and Ni/Fe line ratios, and (4) searching for X-ray counterparts from unidentified HESS sources. These results are of high sci- entific importance in physics of supernova explosions, non-equilibrium plasmas, and cosmic-ray acceleration. XI Multifrequency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources Workshop, 25-30 May 2015 Palermo, Italy ∗Speaker. †A footnote may follow. © c CopyrightCopyright owned owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International. http://pos.sissa.it/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Hubble Revisits the Veil Nebula 2 April 2021
    Image: Hubble revisits the Veil Nebula 2 April 2021 this stellar violence, the shockwaves and debris from the supernova sculpted the Veil Nebula's delicate tracery of ionized gas—creating a scene of surprising astronomical beauty. The Veil Nebula is also featured in Hubble's Caldwell Catalog, a collection of astronomical objects that have been imaged by Hubble and are visible to amateur astronomers in the night sky. Provided by NASA Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, Z. Levay This image taken by the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope revisits the Veil Nebula, which was featured in a previous Hubble image release. In this image, new processing techniques have been applied, bringing out fine details of the nebula's delicate threads and filaments of ionized gas. To create this colorful image, observations were taken by Hubble's Wide Field Camera 3 instrument using five different filters. The new post-processing methods have further enhanced details of emissions from doubly ionized oxygen (seen here in blues), ionized hydrogen, and ionized nitrogen (seen here in reds). The Veil Nebula lies around 2,100 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Cygnus (the Swan), making it a relatively close neighbor in astronomical terms. Only a small portion of the nebula was captured in this image. The Veil Nebula is the visible portion of the nearby Cygnus Loop, a supernova remnant formed roughly 10,000 years ago by the death of a massive star. That star—which was 20 times the mass of the Sun—lived fast and died young, ending its life in a cataclysmic release of energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Observer's Challenge
    MONTHLY OBSERVER'S CHALLENGE Compiled by: Roger Ivester, North Carolina & Sue French, New York September 2020 Report #140 The Veil Nebula in Cygnus Sharing Observations and Bringing Amateur Astronomers Together Introduction The purpose of the Observer's Challenge is to encourage the pursuit of visual observing. It's open to everyone who's interested, and if you're able to contribute notes, and/or drawings, we’ll be happy to include them in our monthly summary. Visual astronomy depends on what's seen through the eyepiece. Not only does it satisfy an innate curiosity, but it allows the visual observer to discover the beauty and the wonderment of the night sky. Before photography, all observations depended on what astronomers saw in the eyepiece, and how they recorded their observations. This was done through notes and drawings, and that's the tradition we're stressing in the Observer's Challenge. And for folks with an interest in astrophotography, your digital images and notes are just as welcome. The hope is that you'll read through these reports and become inspired to take more time at the eyepiece, study each object, and look for those subtle details that you might never have noticed before. This month's target The Veil Nebula has long been modeled as the remnant of a supernova explosion that occurred within an interstellar cavity created by the progenitor star. However, a recent study by Fesen, Weil, and Cisneros (2018MNRAS.481.1786F ) using multi-wavelength emission maps indicates that the large-scale structure of the Veil Nebula is due to interaction of the remnant with local interstellar clouds.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • JRASC December 2011, Low Resolution (PDF)
    The Journal of The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada PROMOTING ASTRONOMY IN CANADA December/décembre 2011 Volume/volume 105 Le Journal de la Société royale d’astronomie du Canada Number/numéro 6 [751] Inside this issue: Since When Was the Sun a Typical Star? A Midsummer Night The Starmus Experience Hubble and Shapley— Two Early Giants of Observational Cosmology A Vintage Star Atlas Night-Sky Poetry from Jasper Students David Levy and his Observing Logs Gigantic Elephant Trunk—IC 1396 FREE SHIPPING To Anywhere in Canada, All Products, Always KILLER VIEWS OF PLANETS CT102 NEW FROM CANADIAN TELESCOPES 102mm f:11 Air Spaced Doublet Achromatic Fraunhoufer Design CanadianTelescopes.Com Largest Collection of Telescopes and Accessories from Major Brands VIXEN ANTARES MEADE EXPLORE SCIENTIFIC CELESTRON CANADIAN TELESCOPES TELEGIZMOS IOPTRON LUNT STARLIGHT INSTRUMENTS OPTEC SBIG TELRAD HOTECH FARPOINT THOUSAND OAKS BAADER PLANETARIUM ASTRO TRAK ASTRODON RASC LOSMANDY CORONADO BORG QSI TELEVUE SKY WATCHER . and more to come December/décembre 2011 | Vol. 105, No. 6 | Whole Number 751 contents / table des matières Feature Articles / Articles de fond 273 Astrocryptic Answers by Curt Nason 232 Since When Was the Sun a Typical Star? 273 It’s Not All Sirius —Cartoon by Martin Beech by Ted Dunphy 238 A Midsummer Night 274 Society News by Robert Dick by James Edgar 240 The Starmus Experience 274 Index to Volume 105, 2011 by Paul and Kathryn Gray 245 Hubble and Shapley—Two Early Giants Columns / Rubriques of Observational Cosmology by Sidney van den Bergh
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Names of Deep Sky (Galaxies,Nebulae and Clusters) Viciana’S List
    POPULAR NAMES OF DEEP SKY (GALAXIES,NEBULAE AND CLUSTERS) VICIANA’S LIST 2ª version August 2014 There isn’t any astronomical guide or star chart without a list of popular names of deep sky objects. Given the huge amount of celestial bodies labeled only with a number, the popular names given to them serve as a friendly anchor in a broad and complicated science such as Astronomy The origin of these names is varied. Some of them come from mythology (Pleiades); others from their discoverer; some describe their shape or singularities; (for instance, a rotten egg, because of its odor); and others belong to a constellation (Great Orion Nebula); etc. The real popular names of celestial bodies are those that for some special characteristic, have been inspired by the imagination of astronomers and amateurs. The most complete list is proposed by SEDS (Students for the Exploration and Development of Space). Other sources that have been used to produce this illustrated dictionary are AstroSurf, Wikipedia, Astronomy Picture of the Day, Skymap computer program, Cartes du ciel and a large bibliography of THE NAMES OF THE UNIVERSE. If you know other name of popular deep sky objects and you think it is important to include them in the popular names’ list, please send it to [email protected] with at least three references from different websites. If you have a good photo of some of the deep sky objects, please send it with standard technical specifications and an optional comment. It will be published in the names of the Universe blog. It could also be included in the ILLUSTRATED DICTIONARY OF POPULAR NAMES OF DEEP SKY.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Observations of Tev and Gev Emitting Supernova Remnants
    Radio Observations of TeV and GeV emitting Supernova Remnants Denis Leahy University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (collaborator Wenwu Tian, National Astronomical Observatories of China) outline • Overview of supernova remnants • using HI absorption spectra to obtain distances • HI spectra and images (radio, X-ray) of specific gamma-ray emitting SNR • distance and derived properties • summary radius ~1- 20 pc (1 pc~ 3x10 16 m) Shock speeds 100km/s- 5000km/s Supernova Remnants (left to right, top to bottom): Cygnus Loop (~10000yr old) ROSAT X-ray, Tycho's SN (AD1572) Chandra X- ray, Crab nebula (AD1054) HST /Chandra, Cas A (AD1681+-19) Chandra X- ray, Kepler's SN (AD1604) Chandra X -ray Supernova remnants • 2 physical types of supernova (SN): • Core collapse of a massive star (gravitational energy) ~10 53 erg mostly in neutrinos, ~10 51 erg in kinetic energy • Thermonuclear explosion of a white dwarf: ~10 51 erg in total / kinetic energy • 2 observational types of SN: • Type I: no H lines in SN spectrum • Type II: with strong H lines in SN spectrum • Supernova remnants (SNR): remains of SN explosion • Number of known SNR in our Galaxy: approximately 280 • Large volume of the interstellar medium (~1 to 20pc in radius), filled with hot (10 6 K) plasma, heated by the shock wave of the explosion • The shock wave via Fermi acceleration, produces high energy protons and electrons, up to ~10 15 eV • SNR emit X-rays (from the hot plasma), radio (from the relativistic electrons), infrared (from heated dust) and optical radiation (from recombining dense gas). • Shock accelerated particles also emit X-rays and GeV & TeV gamma-rays.
    [Show full text]
  • Supernova Remnants and the Life Cycle of Interstellar Dust
    Design Reference Mission Case Study Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Science Steering Committee Supernova Remnants and the Life Cycle of Interstellar Dust Program contacts: Eli Dwek, Richard Arendt, Jesse Bregman, Sean Colgan, Harriet Dinerstein, Robert Gehrz, Harvey Moseley Scientific category: INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM Instruments: EXES, FLITECAM/CAM, FORCAST, FIFI-LS, HAWC, SAFIRE Hours of observation: 110 Abstract We propose to use the unique instrumental capabilities of SOFIA to conduct imaging and spectroscopic studies of supernovae (SNe), of young supernova remnants (SNRs) for which the ejecta have not yet fully mixed with the ISM, and select regions in older remnants which are interacting with the ambient ISM. These observations will address key issues within NASA’s Visions for Science quest for discovering the origin, structure, evolution and destiny of the universe: What is the origin of dust in early universe? How efficient are supernovae in producing interstellar dust? How efficient are their blast waves in destroying, processing, or even forming dust as they expand into the circumstellar and interstellar medium? How do interstellar shocks facilitate chemical reaction on the surfaces of dust grains? The answers to these questions are crucial for understanding the evolutionary cycle of interstellar dust, the role of dust in the processing of starlight and in determining the thermal balance and chemistry of the ISM, and its role in the formation of protoplanetary objects. Our proposed observations will explore crucial stages of this evolutionary cycle, most readily observed at wavelengths between ∼ 5 − 300 µm with spectral resolution from ∼ 30 − 3 × 104, and at spatial resolution of a few arcseconds, requiring therefore the unique capabilities of the different SOFIA instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Supernova Remnants: the X-Ray Perspective
    Supernova remnants: the X-ray perspective Jacco Vink Abstract Supernova remnants are beautiful astronomical objects that are also of high scientific interest, because they provide insights into supernova explosion mechanisms, and because they are the likely sources of Galactic cosmic rays. X-ray observations are an important means to study these objects. And in particular the advances made in X-ray imaging spectroscopy over the last two decades has greatly increased our knowledge about supernova remnants. It has made it possible to map the products of fresh nucleosynthesis, and resulted in the identification of regions near shock fronts that emit X-ray synchrotron radiation. Since X-ray synchrotron radiation requires 10-100 TeV electrons, which lose their energies rapidly, the study of X-ray synchrotron radiation has revealed those regions where active and rapid particle acceleration is taking place. In this text all the relevant aspects of X-ray emission from supernova remnants are reviewed and put into the context of supernova explosion properties and the physics and evolution of su- pernova remnants. The first half of this review has a more tutorial style and discusses the basics of supernova remnant physics and X-ray spectroscopy of the hot plasmas they contain. This in- cludes hydrodynamics, shock heating, thermal conduction, radiation processes, non-equilibrium ionization, He-like ion triplet lines, and cosmic ray acceleration. The second half offers a review of the advances made in field of X-ray spectroscopy of supernova remnants during the last 15 year. This period coincides with the availability of X-ray imaging spectrometers. In addition, I discuss the results of high resolution X-ray spectroscopy with the Chandra and XMM-Newton gratings.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrobiology Math
    National Aeronautics andSpace Administration Aeronautics National Astrobiology Math This collection of activities is based on a weekly series of space science problems intended for students looking for additional challenges in the math and physical science curriculum in grades 6 through 12. The problems were created to be authentic glimpses of modern science and engineering issues, often involving actual research data. The problems were designed to be one-pagers with a Teacher’s Guide and Answer Key as a second page. This compact form was deemed very popular by participating teachers. Astrobiology Math Mathematical Problems Featuring Astrobiology Applications Dr. Sten Odenwald NASA / ADNET Corp. [email protected] Astrobiology Math i http://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Ms. Daniella Scalice for her boundless enthusiasm in the review and editing of this resource. Ms. Scalice is the Education and Public Outreach Coordinator for the NASA Astrobiology Institute (NAI) at the Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California. We would also like to thank the team of educators and scientists at NAI who graciously read through the first draft of this book and made numerous suggestions for improving it and making it more generally useful to the astrobiology education community: Dr. Harold Geller (George Mason University), Dr. James Kratzer (Georgia Institute of Technology; Doyle Laboratory) and Ms. Suzi Taylor (Montana State University), For more weekly classroom activities about astronomy and space visit the Space Math@ NASA website, http://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov Image Credits: Front Cover: Collage created by Julie Fletcher (NAI), molecule image created by Jenny Mottar, NASA HQ.
    [Show full text]