The Gridlock Illusion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Gridlock Illusion WQ IS DEMOCRACY THE WILSON QUARTERLY SURVEYING THE WORLD OF IDEAS WORTH IT? THE GRIDLOCK ILLUSION WINTER 2013 THE WILSON QUARTERLY WINTER 2013 W SURVEYING THE WORLD OF IDEAS V. 37, NUMBER 1 Q PUBLISHED BY THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS COVER STORY FEATURES IS DEMOCRACY WORTH IT? THE GRIDLOCK ILLUSION by R. SHEP MELNICK The Arab Spring’s aftermath brings fresh reminders Arguments that our political system that transitions to democracy are not painless. is bedeviled by gridlock overlook They bring instability and uncertainty. Some fail. its capacity for major policy change. Our authors weigh the risks and rewards in countries From its strong response to the around the world. financial crisis to the passage of health care reform, Washington has chalked up more accomplishments than most people realize. EDITOR’S COMMENT FINDINGS IN ESSENCE Our survey of notable articles from other journals and magazines 1. WHY WAIT FOR DEMOCRACY? CURRENT BOOKS by LARRY DIAMOND Reviews of new and noteworthy nonfiction 2. VOTING AGAINST FREEDOM by JOSHUA KUCERA LETTERS 3. AFGHANISTAN IN THREE VOICES ABOUT US by NORWAN, MARIAM, AND NASIMA 4. AFRICA’S LONG SPRING The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Woodrow Wilson by STEVE McDONALD International Center for Scholars. ON THE COVER: A woman waits to cast her vote in ABOVE: In the notorious Port-au-Prince slum of Cité Soleil, the Senegalese presidential election of 2007, in which voters cast their ballots in Haiti’s 2006 national elections. President Abdoulaye Wade won a second term. Photograph: Charles Eckert / Redux Photograph: Finbarr O’Reilly / Reuters / Corbis EDITOR’S COMMENT STEVEN LAGERFELD is the editor of The Wilson THE ANSWER IS YES Quarterly. Before joining the magazine’s staff in the Almost since the “Third Wave” of global 1980s, he worked at The democratization began in the 1970s, tran- Public Interest and the Insti- sitions to democracy have been a major fo- tute for Educational Affairs. cus of the Woodrow Wilson Center. Our His articles and reviews have appeared in The Atlantic, cover “cluster” of essays in this issue is the Harper’s, The New Republic, latest product of a commitment grounded The Wall Street Journal, and in the Center’s landmark Transitions From other publications. Authoritarian Rule (1986), a four-volume compendium of articles growing out of conferences, seminars, and other pro- the relatively affluent societies that made grams held at the Center in previous years. the transition in the past. And while the In April, Johns Hopkins University Press Internet and social media help the dem- will reissue the series’ capstone volume, ocratic cause in many ways, they speed Transitions From Authoritarian Rule: Ten- up the pace of decision making, abet the tative Conclusions About Uncertain Democ- spread of rumor and misinformation, and racies, with a new prologue by Abraham add further complexity to political life. F. Lowenthal and Cynthia J. Arnson. At least one concern has remained con- The authors—Lowenthal was head stant since the Third Wave began: Hard of the Center’s Latin American pro- as it is to establish electoral democracy, it gram when the Transitions project was may be even harder to establish true de- launched, and Arnson holds that position mocracy. Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez and today—make interesting points about the Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are elect- differences between then and now. In 1986 ed leaders, for example, but their com- there was optimism aplenty, but also much patriots do not enjoy what we think of as worry about the pitfalls facing democra- democratic citizenship. It is because there tizing countries. Today there is somewhat are so many ways the quest for democra- less optimism, and a host of new chal- cy can go astray that we ask in this issue, lenges have arisen. Many of the countries “Is democracy worth it?” Despite all the now leaving authoritarianism behind have perils and new challenges, I myself can- little or no historical experience with de- not imagine any other answer but yes. mocracy. Most are also much poorer than — Steven Lagerfeld THE WILSON QUARTERLY WINTER 2013 FINDINGS BRIEF NOTES OF INTEREST ON ALL TOPICS 1. 4. Prague’s No Spin Zone Open Covenants, Havel meets the press—on his terms Secretly Arrived At When Václav Havel spoke, Western... Fourteen Points’ false promise In 1918, enunciating the list of guide- lines for the postwar world that would... 5. Wilde’s Women Constance and inconstancy Beyond plays and bons mots, Oscar Wilde may be best remembered for... 2. Prohibition Class The ’20s didn’t roar for all Xenophobia-tinged class warfare helped... 3. Death Watch Newsroom countdown Insurance actuaries aren’t the only... 6. Distant Laughter Humor’s calculus Comedy is tragedy plus time. Whoever said that—the line has been attributed... THE WILSON QUARTERLY WINTER 2013 FINDINGS PRAGUE’S was “an international icon of integrity” NO SPIN ZONE (The New York Times), a “genuine hero” (Newsweek), a “secular saint” (Toronto Havel meets the press—on his terms Globe and Mail), and “a moral giant in When Václav Havel spoke, Western jour- an era of pygmies” (Der Spiegel). nalists didn’t just listen—they genuflected. Not that the accolades were unde- The dissident-turned-Czech-president served. A playwright, essayist, and poet, Havel spent most of his adult life standing up to Czechoslovakia’s com- munist regime. Security forces followed, wire- tapped, harassed, inter- rogated, and jailed him, once for a four-year term. After the Berlin Wall came down in No- vember 1989, Havel— just six months out of prison—helped lead protests that attracted hundreds of thousands of Czechs. The gov- ernment didn’t put up much of a fight. In late December, the federal assembly unanimously elected Havel president, a choice ratified by voters in June 1990. Except for one six-month period, BETTMANN / CORBIS Substance over style: When he addressed the U.S. Congress in 1990, Václav Havel, the newly elected president of Czechoslovakia, rebuffed the advice of a speech coach. Congress gave him a rapturous response anyway. THE WILSON QUARTERLY WINTER 2013 FINDINGS he served as president until 2003, first of 2007, after his final term as president, Czechoslovakia and then of the Czech Havel responded in his play “Leaving.” Republic. He died in 2011. When reporters arrive to interview a To Western ears, “everything he chancellor at the end of his term, he ex- said sounded beautiful,” Yale histori- pects questions about his political leg- an Marci Shore observed by e-mail. acy. Instead, they care only about sex “He didn’t sound like a politician, and and scandal. that was part of our enchantment.” In But Havel’s wariness of the press— The Taste of Ashes: The Afterlife of Total- Western as well as Czech—began long itarianism in Eastern Europe (Crown), before his second marriage. From the Shore quotes an American journalist outset of his presidency, some journal- on Havel’s speech to a joint session of ists found him “a difficult customer,” -ac the U.S. Congress in 1990: “If I could cording to Michael Zantovsky, Havel’s talk like that, I would run for God.” press secretary in the early 1990s and Yet the press’s relationship with Havel currently the Czech ambassador to the was more complicated than it seemed. United Kingdom. Although coverage in Western news During the communist era, Czecho- media remained largely positive, much slovakia’s official media routinely dis- of the Czech media grew critical during torted Havel’s statements, Zantovsky Havel’s reign. At first purely political, the said at a conference in Prague last criticism ultimately became personal as October. In 1977, for instance, Havel well, according to Paul Wilson, Havel’s pledged not to engage in “criminal ac- friend and the English-language trans- tivities” in exchange for a promise that lator of many of his works. In particular, he be released from prison. Rudé Právo, Wilson said in an interview, the Czech the Communist Party’s official newspa- press and public revered Havel’s wife, per, falsely claimed that he had pledged Olga, who had worked alongside him to avoid “all political activities.” Some during his dissident years. Following a of his supporters felt betrayed, and long illness, she died in 1997. Less than Havel was devastated. He developed a a year later, Havel married an actress, deep-seated distrust of the press, and it Dagmar Veskrnova. Some of the Czech stayed with him. press stepped up their attacks on the In addition, Havel was a meticulous president by going after his new wife. In wordsmith. “By vocation, he was a THE WILSON QUARTERLY WINTER 2013 FINDINGS writer—and as a writer, he did not only ters conducted the first American TV think about the content of the mes- interview with Havel that same year. sage, but also about the shape of the Asked by e-mail if the reporter might message,” Zantovsky said. “He simply have been Walters, Zantovsky respond- hated it when journalists would try to ed, “It might.”) edit him, interpret him, rephrase him, Others tried to refine Havel’s pub- because he felt that the original phrase lic-speaking style. Before he addressed was the right one.” Congress in 1990, an American advis- Havel’s demeanor in television inter- er—Prague-born Madeleine Albright, views posed challenges, too. In 1990, a the future secretary of state—arranged prominent TV reporter from the Unit- for him to meet with a speech coach. In ed States—Zantovsky declined to name Zantovsky’s account, it was the TV in- her—interviewed Havel in Prague. He terview all over again: The expert told answered her first questions while gaz- Havel to look up while speaking, and ing at the floor.
Recommended publications
  • The Phenomenology of Gridlock
    Cornell Law Library Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 6-2013 The heP nomenology of Gridlock Josh Chafetz Cornell Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub Part of the Legislation Commons, and the Politics Commons Recommended Citation Chafetz, Josh, "The heP nomenology of Gridlock" (2013). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 586. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/586 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SYMPOSIUM THE AMERICAN CONGRESS: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF GRIDLOCK THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF GRIDLOCK Josh Chafet4 Assertions that our legislative process is gridlocked-perhaps even "hopelessly" so-are endemic. So many more of our problems would be fixed, the thinking goes, if only our political institutions were functioning properly. The hunt for the causes of gridlock is therefore afoot. This Essay argues that this hunt is fundamentally misguided, because gridlock is not a phenomenon. Rather, gridlock is the absence of phenomena; it is the absence, that is, of legisla- tive action. Rather than asking why we experience gridlock, we should be asking why and how legislative action occurs. We should expect to see legislative action, the Essay argues, when there is sufficient public consensus for a specific course of action. "Sufficient," in this context, is determined with reference to ourspecific constitutionalstructure.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Towards a Third Generation of Global Governance Scholarship This Is the Final Typeset and Copyedited PDF Version. the Chapter
    Towards a Third Generation of Global Governance Scholarship This is the final typeset and copyedited PDF version. The chapter should be cited as: David Coen and Tom Pegram, ‘Towards a Third Generation of Global Governance Scholarship’, Global Policy, Global Policy, Volume 9, Issue 1 (February 2018), 107-113. Abstract Global governance is widely viewed as in crisis. Deepening interdependence of cross-border activity belies the relative absence of governance mechanisms capable of effectively tackling major global policy challenges. Scholars have an important role to play in understanding blockages and ways through. A first generation of global governance research made visible an increasingly complex and globalising reality beyond the interstate domain. A varied second generation of scholarship, spanning diverse subfields, has built upon this ‘signpost scholarship’ to generate insight into efforts to manage, bypass and even – potentially – transcend multilateral gridlock to address pressing transboundary problems. This article plots a course towards a ‘third generation’ of global governance research, serving to also introduce a special section which brings together leading scholars in the field of global governance, working across theoretical, analytical and issue-area boundaries. This collaborative endeavour proposes to advance a convergence, already underway, across a theoretically and empirically rich existing scholarship, distinguished by a concern for the complexity of global policy delivery. 1 Introduction Although its conceptual, analytical and theoretical boundaries may be hotly debated, global governance is widely viewed as a vital component to addressing transboundary common goods challenges, from large-scale violence to sustainable development, health to climate change, bio-pathogen containment to financial disruption. As Martin Wolf (2012) of the Financial Times suggests, humanity’s efforts to overcome the tragedy of the global commons ‘could prove to be the defining story of the century’.
    [Show full text]
  • Media and Gridlock
    Media and Gridlock Daniel F. Stone1 9th Media Economics Workshop - New Economic School October 2011 1Oregon State University I Anecdotal evidence: minority party tried to block major new policy proposals (social security, health care reform, jobs bill?) I Term `gridlock' only coined after 1980 elections I Binder (1999): hard evidence of increasing gridlock in 80s and 90s (term coined in 80s) I Cloture motions way up over time, especially in last two Congresses Gridlock in U.S. appears to have increased in recent years I Term `gridlock' only coined after 1980 elections I Binder (1999): hard evidence of increasing gridlock in 80s and 90s (term coined in 80s) I Cloture motions way up over time, especially in last two Congresses Gridlock in U.S. appears to have increased in recent years I Anecdotal evidence: minority party tried to block major new policy proposals (social security, health care reform, jobs bill?) I Binder (1999): hard evidence of increasing gridlock in 80s and 90s (term coined in 80s) I Cloture motions way up over time, especially in last two Congresses Gridlock in U.S. appears to have increased in recent years I Anecdotal evidence: minority party tried to block major new policy proposals (social security, health care reform, jobs bill?) I Term `gridlock' only coined after 1980 elections I Cloture motions way up over time, especially in last two Congresses Gridlock in U.S. appears to have increased in recent years I Anecdotal evidence: minority party tried to block major new policy proposals (social security, health care reform, jobs bill?) I Term `gridlock' only coined after 1980 elections I Binder (1999): hard evidence of increasing gridlock in 80s and 90s (term coined in 80s) Gridlock in U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Gridlock Matters
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\88-5\NDL503.txt unknown Seq: 1 2-JUL-13 11:56 WHY GRIDLOCK MATTERS Michael J. Gerhardt* INTRODUCTION A week before the 2012 presidential election, I had the opportunity to speak with a former senator. I asked him about gridlock. I wondered what he would say to my law students who had lost hope in the legislative process because of the gridlock that defined the 112th Congress. He told me that they had good reason to have lost hope. He said that he conceived of the legislative process as a target; that the center of the target represented the areas that were most important to the country and the likeliest ones in which bipartisan agreement could be reached; and that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA” or “Affordable Care Act”),1 in which he said that President Obama had invested so much time and capital, was on the periph- ery, if not the outside, of the target. He explained that the ACA exceeded the scope of congressional power. He explained that opposing the ACA should be the top priority of legislators and citizens. When I asked him what issues were at the center of the target, he initially did not respond. After I politely pressed him for an answer, he eventually said that there was nothing more important than opposing the health care bill. For him, gridlock had become a constitutional necessity. The former senator’s position on gridlock is hardly unique. Indeed, more than a year before President Obama’s re-election, Antonin Scalia, the longest serving justice on the current Supreme Court, told the Senate Judici- ary Committee that, “Americans should learn to love gridlock .
    [Show full text]
  • How Partisan Gridlock in State Legislatures Encourages the Use of Citizen Initiatives
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2015/11/23/how-partisan-gridlock-in-state-legislatures-encourages-the-use-of-citizen-initiatives/ How partisan gridlock in state legislatures encourages the use of citizen initiatives. While partisan gridlock has become a common occurrence in the US Congress, this is also often the case in many state legislatures. In new research, Frederick J. Boehmke, Tracy L. Osborn, and Emily U. Schilling look at one consequence of legislative rules that encourage legislative paralysis – the increasing use of ballot initiatives by citizens. Using data from the American states, they find that as ‘pivotal legislators’ – gatekeepers whose support is needed to overcome a legislative filibuster or gubernatorial veto – become ideologically farther away from the state’s median voter, initiative use increases due to those lawmakers thwarting legislative action to secure preferred outcomes in the form of ballot measures. In the early 20th century, Progressive reformers pushed for institutions of direct legislation, such as the initiative, referendum and recall, as a means to return power to the people and to place a check on elected officials. In this way, the direct initiative process in the American states offers a potential cure for legislative inaction. In the current era of increased legislative polarization and gridlock, such institutions may be more important than ever. In new research, we find that the initiative process can indeed provide an important alternate mechanism for making policy. Yet, the initiative process can potentially both hinder and encourage legislative obstructionism. We show that more burdensome hurdles for legislative action in the American states lead citizens to sponsor more ballot measures in order to alter policy outside the legislative arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Gridlock, Lobbying, and Democracy Joseph P
    University of Cincinnati College of Law University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications Faculty Articles and Other Publications College of Law Faculty Scholarship 2017 Gridlock, Lobbying, and Democracy Joseph P. Tomain University of Cincinnati College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Joseph P. Tomain, Gridlock, Lobbying, and Democracy, 7 Wake Forest J.L. Pol'y 87 (2017) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law Faculty Scholarship at University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Articles and Other Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Cincinnati College of Law Scholarship and Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GRIDLOCK, LOBBYING, AND DEMOCRACY JOSEPH P. TOMAINt the Supreme Court vacancy left by W Antoninith the refusalScalia, theto fillSenate adds another layer of gridlock in Washington.' In the recent past, congressional gridlock has threatened to shut down the legislative process by such maneuvers as creating a faux debt crisis and by regularly assailing the president and the executive branch over so-called job-killing regulations.' Through these efforts, obstructionist Republicans have attempted a gridlock hat-trick by trying to shut down each of the three branches of government-at least as far as the headlines go.' The political reality, however, is more nuanced, and gridlock is more complicated than commentators often claim-and not to the public benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Political Gridlock
    Theoretical Economics 12 (2017), 555–586 1555-7561/20170555 A theory of political gridlock Juan Ortner Department of Economics, Boston University This paper studies how electoral incentives influence the outcomes of political ne- gotiations. It considers a game between two political parties that have to bargain over which policy to implement. While bargaining, the parties’ popularity varies over time. Changes in popularity are partly exogenous and partly driven by the parties’ actions. There is an election scheduled at a future date and the party with more popularity at the election date wins the vote. Electoral incentives can have substantial effects on bargaining outcomes. Periods of gridlock may arise when the election is close and parties have similar levels of popularity. Keywords. Bargaining, elections, political gridlock, inefficient delay. JEL classification. C73, C78, D72. 1. Introduction An important element of political negotiations—especially negotiations over high- profile or landmark legislation—is that agreements can have consequences that go well beyond implemented policies. As Binder and Lee (2013) put it, “Negotiation in Congress is never solely about policy; politics and policy are always intertwined.” Beyond policy considerations, political parties usually weigh whether compromising on a given issue is in their best electoral interest. Reaching an agreement can lead to changes in the par- ties’ level of support among voters, and these changes can be of crucial importance in determining electoral outcomes. The goal of the current paper is to study how such elec- toral incentives affect the outcomes of political negotiations. The results shed light on the circumstances under which electoral considerations can lead to periods of gridlock and political inaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism in Eastern Europe During and After Communism
    James Hughes Federalism in Eastern Europe during and after Communism Book section Original citation: Originally published in Fagan, Adam and Kopecký, Petr, (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics. Routledge, London, UK. ISBN 9781138919754 © 2018 Routledge This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/69642/ Available in LSE Research Online: March 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Federalism in Eastern Europe during and after Communism James Hughes Chapter 10 Forthcoming in Adam Fagan and Petr Kopecky eds. The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics. Routledge 2017 One of the earliest political visionaries of federalism in Eastern Europe,interwar Polish leader Józef Piłsudski, famously remarked to former socialist comrades that “we both took
    [Show full text]
  • Led Zeppelin Greatest Hits Zip Download Cold As Ice 3:42 03
    Led zeppelin greatest hits zip download Cold As Ice 3:42 03. Night Life 03:23 13. Blue Morning, Blue Day 05. The Wanton Song 06. Long, Long Way From Home 2:52 02. Band members: 1981—1986 Jack Russell — lead vocals Mark Kendall — lead guitar Lorne Black — bass guitar Gary Holland — drums 1986—1987 Jack Russell — lead vocals Mark Kendall — lead guitar Lorne Black — bass guitar Audie Desbrow — drums Michael Lardie — guitar, keyboards 1987—1992 Jack Russell — lead vocals Mark Kendall — lead guitar Tony Montana — bass guitar Audie Desbrow — drums Michael Lardie — guitar, keyboards J Todd Henson — guitar in-studio guitarist, 1991-92 1992—1995 Jack Russell — lead vocals Mark Kendall — lead guitar Teddy Cook — bass guitar Audie Desbrow — drums Michael Lardie — guitar, keyboards 1995—2000 Jack Russell — lead vocals Mark Kendall — lead guitar Sean Led zeppelin greatest hits zip download — bass guitar Audie Desbrow — drums Michael Lardie — guitar, keyboards 2000—2001 Jack Russell — lead vocals Ty Longley — lead guitar Krys Baratto — bass guitar Francis Ruiz — drums Matthew Johnson — guitar, keyboards 2002—2003 Jack Russell — lead vocals Mark Kendall — lead guitar Dave Filice — bass guitar Eric Powers — drums Ty Longley — guitar, keyboards 2003—2005 Jack Russell — lead vocals Mark Kendall — lead guitar Scott Pounds — bass guitar Joseph May — drums Tyler Nelson — guitar, keyboards 2006—2007 Jack Russell — lead vocals Mark Kendall — lead guitar Sean McNabb — bass guitar Audie Desbrow — drums Michael Lardie — guitar, keyboards 2008 Jack Russell — lead vocals Mark Kendall — lead guitar Scott Snyder — bass guitar Audie Desbrow — drums Michael Lardie — guitar, keyboards 2012 - Elation На данной хитрой пираточке трек-лист мальца другой, чем на облоге.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island
    Case 1:03-cv-00148-L Document 5 Filed 05/01/2003 Page 1 of 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND TAMMY PASSA, ALIAS, . WALTER CASTLEIJR., ALIAS and CHERYL HARRIS-ROSSI, NEXT-OF-: KIN of Decedent, JOSEPH E. ROSS1 . JEFFREY DERDERIAN, . MICHAEL DERDERIAN, DERCO LLC, d/b/a The Station, . MANIC MUSIC MANAGEMENT, INC., JACK RUSSELL, MARK KENDALL, DAVID FILICE, ERIC POWERS, DANIEL BICHELE , . PAUL WOOLNOUGH, KNIGHT RECORDS,INC., ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES INC., McLAUGHLIN AND MORANIINC., LUNA TECH, INC., LUNA TECH PYROTECHNIK GmbH, . AMERICAN FOAM CORPORATION, GENERAL FOAM CORPORATION, FOAMEX INTERNATIONAL INC., WHJY, INC., CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., TOWN OF WEST WARWICK, DENNIS LAROCQUE, INDIVIDUALLY and as FIRE INSPECTOR FOR THE TOWN OF: WEST WARWICK, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, IRVING J. OWENS, Individually and in his capacity as FIRE MARSHAL FOR THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, TRITON REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, TRITON REALTY, INC., . and JOHN DOES 1 through 100 Case 1:03-cv-00148-L Document 5 Filed 05/01/2003 Page 2 of 97 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TAB Table of Contents........................... i Jurisdictional Allegations - Plaintiffs..... 2 1 Jurisdiction Allegations - Defendants....... 6 2 Facts..................................... 17 3 Count One (Joint Enterprise Defendant) Jeffrey Derderian................. 28 4 Count Two (Joint Enterprise Defendant) Michael Derderian................. 31 5 Count Three (Joint Enterprise Defendant) DERCO LLC d/b/a The Station....... 34 6 Count Four (Joint Enterprise Defendant) MANIC MUSIC MANAGEMENT, INC. ..... 38 7 Count Five (Joint Enterprise Defendants) Jack Russell, Mark Kendall, David Filice, Eric Powers (Collectively as the band known as Great White) ................................. 41 8 Count Six (Joint Enterprise Defendant) Daniel Bichele...................
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Stephen, Matthew D. Article — Accepted Manuscript (Postprint) Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance Global Governance Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Stephen, Matthew D. (2017) : Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance, Global Governance, ISSN 1942-6720, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, Vol. 23, Iss. 3, pp. 483-502, http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02303009 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215866 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu This article was published by Brill in Global Governance, Vol. 23 (2017), Iss. 3, pp. 483–502 (2017/08/19): https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02303009.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism and Decentralization – a Critical Survey of Frequently Used Indicators
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics Joint Discussion Paper MAGKS Göttingen Series in Economics Kassel Aachen by the Universities of Siegen Marburg Aachen · Gießen · Göttingen Kassel · Marburg · Siegen Gießen ISSN 1867-3678 No. 21-2008 Lorenz Blume and Stefan Voigt Federalism and Decentralization – A Critical Survey of Frequently Used Indicators This paper can be downloaded from http://www.uni-marburg.de/fb02/makro/forschung/magkspapers/index_html%28magks%29 Coordination: Bernd Hayo • Philipps-University Marburg Faculty of Business Administration and Economics • Universitätsstraße 24, D-35032 Marburg Tel: +49-6421-2823091, Fax: +49-6421-2823088, e-mail: [email protected] Federalism and Decentralization – A Critical Survey of Frequently Used Indicators1 Lorenz Blume * and Stefan Voigt # Abstract: The economic effects of federalism are unclear: some papers find that federalism has strong positive effects on a number of economically relevant variables, others find negative effects. The results often crucially hinge upon the proxies for federalism used. In this paper, we critically survey the existing indicators for both federalism and fiscal decentralization. We argue that federalism is a constitutional institution whereas decentralization is (the outcome of) a policy choice and that the two ought to be systematically distinguished because decentralization can also occur in non-federally structured states. We further argue that institutional details are very important with regard to federalism and that dummy variables usually capture only very specific aspects of the institutional details. We use factor analysis to test whether the latent variables behind the observed indicators support these assumptions.
    [Show full text]