THE BUZZ Page 2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
State of the Industry: Results from the 2012 Global Mobile Money Adoption Survey
State of the Industry: Results from the 2012 Global Mobile Money Adoption Survey Claire Pénicaud Contents 1 – 2 Executive Summary 3 – 4 Introduction 5 – 6 Part 1 – How is mobile money spreading globally? 7 – 8 Part 2 – How do the performances of mobile money deployments compare? 9 – 14 Part 3 – What makes the fastest growing deployments succeed? 15 – 17 Part 4 – How many people are using mobile money? 18 – 23 Part 5 – How are customers using mobile money? 24 – 25 Part 6 – How is the distribution of mobile money evolving? 26 – 27 Part 7 – How is mobile money contributing to financial inclusion? 28 Conclusion 29 – 30 Appendix A – List of participants 31 – 32 Appendix B – Copy of the survey questionnaire 33 – 34 Appendix C – Key indicators by region Tables and figures 5 Table 1 – Percentages of live and planned deployments by region 19 Table 2 – Global product mixes 5 Figure 1 – Number of live mobile money services for the unbanked by region 8 Figure 2 – Mobile money is a two-tier landscape 8 Figure 3 – Mobile money is a two-tier landscape – focus on the first 24 months 12 Figure 4 – Number of FTE dedicated to mobile money for sprinters 13 Figure 5 – Percentage of GSM base actively using mobile money for sprinters (June 2012) 16 Figure 6 – Number of active and inactive customer accounts by mobile money provider (June 2012) 17 Figure 7 – Number of registered and active customer accounts by region (June 2012) 19 Figure 8 – Global product mix by value (June 2012) 19 Figure 9 – Global product mix by value (June 2012) 20 Figure 10 – Average number -
Weatherhead Center for International Affairs
WEATHERHEAD CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS H A R V A R D U N I V E R S I T Y two2004-2005 thousand four – two thousand five ANNUAL REPORTS two2005-2006 thousand five – two thousand six 1737 Cambridge Street • Cambridge, MA 02138 www.wcfia.harvard.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 PEOPLE Visiting Committee 4 Executive Committee 4 Administration 6 RESEARCH ACTIVITIES Small Grants for Faculty Research Projects 8 Medium Grants for Faculty Research Projects 9 Large Grants for Faculty Research Projects 9 Large Grants for Faculty Research Semester Leaves 9 Distinguished Lecture Series 11 Weatherhead Initiative in International Affairs 12 CONFERENCES 13 RESEARCH SEMINARS Challenges of the Twenty-First Century 34 Communist and Postcommunist Countries 35 Comparative Politics Research Workshop 36 Comparative Politics Seminar 39 Director’s Faculty Seminar 39 Economic Growth and Development 40 Harvard-MIT Joint Seminar on Political Development 41 Herbert C. Kelman Seminar on International Conflict Analysis and Resolution 42 International Business 43 International Economics 45 International History 48 Middle East 49 Political Violence and Civil War 51 Science and Society 51 South Asia 52 Transatlantic Relations 53 U.S. Foreign Policy 54 RESEARCH PROGRAMS Canada Program 56 Fellows Program 58 Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies 65 John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies 74 Justice, Welfare, and Economics 80 Nonviolent Sanctions and Cultural Survival 82 Religion, Political Economy, and Society 84 Student Programs 85 Transnational Studies Initiative 95 U.S.-Japan Relations 96 PUBLICATIONS 104 ANNUAL REPORTS 2004–2005 / 2005–2006 - 1 - INTRODUCTION In August 2005, the Weatherhead Center moved In another first, the faculty research semester to the new Center for Government and leaves that the Center awarded in spring 2005 International Studies (CGIS) complex. -
Correlated Observations, the Law of Small Numbers and Bank Runs
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Horváth, Gergely; Kiss, Hubert János Working Paper Correlated observations, the law of small numbers and bank runs IEHAS Discussion Papers, No. MT-DP - 2014/29 Provided in Cooperation with: Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Suggested Citation: Horváth, Gergely; Kiss, Hubert János (2014) : Correlated observations, the law of small numbers and bank runs, IEHAS Discussion Papers, No. MT-DP - 2014/29, ISBN 978-615-5447-48-8, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Budapest This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/108358 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. -
Money in the Bank Money in the Bank
TO PLAY TM PLAYSET RECREATE YOUR FAVORITE MONEY IN THE BANK™ MATCH! MONEYINSTRUCTIONSINSTRUCTIONS IN THE BANK INSTRUCTION SHEET 6+ SPECIFICATIONS Toy: WWE Money In The Bank playset Please keep these instructions for future reference as they contain important information. Toy No.: Y7022 Part No.: 0920 3 labels Trim Size: A4 CONTENTS 1 WARNING: Folded Size: A5 – Small parts. CHOKING HAZARD Type of Fold: Not for children under 3 years. 4 # colors: One 2 Colors: Black Paper Stock: White Offset Paper Weight: 70 lb. EDM No.: x2 x3 x4 x4 x4 x4 APPLY LABELS 4 1 1 1 2 Dolph Ziggler™ figure included. Additional figures sold separately, subject to availability. ©2013 Mattel. All Rights Reserved. 1 Mattel, Inc. 636 Girard Avenue, East Aurora, NY 14052, U.S.A. Consumer Relations 1-800-524-8697. Mattel U.K. Ltd., Vanwall Business Park, Maidenhead SL6 4UB. Helpline 01628 500303. Mattel Australia Pty., Ltd., Richmond, Victoria. 3121.Consumer Advisory Service - 1300 135 312. 3 Mattel East Asia Ltd., Room 1106, South Tower, World Finance Centre, Harbour City, Tsimshatsui, HK, China. Diimport & Diedarkan Oleh: Mattel SEA Ptd Ltd.(993532-P) Lot 13.5, 13th Floor, Menara Lien Hoe, Persiaran Tropicana Golf Country Resort, 47410 PJ. Tel:03-78803817, Fax:03-78803867. Y7022-0920 All WWE programming, talent names, images, likenesses, slogans, wrestling moves, trademarks, logos and copyrights are the exclusive property of WWE and its subsidiaries. All other trademarks, logos and copyrights are the property of their respective owners. © 2013 WWE. All Rights Reserved. service.mattel.com ASSEMBLY 3 Attach accessories. 1 Set up the ring. -
British Bulldogs, Behind SIGNATURE MOVE: F5 Rolled Into One Mass of Humanity
MEMBERS: David Heath (formerly known as Gangrel) BRODUS THE BROOD Edge & Christian, Matt & Jeff Hardy B BRITISH CLAY In 1998, a mystical force appeared in World Wrestling B HT: 6’7” WT: 375 lbs. Entertainment. Led by the David Heath, known in FROM: Planet Funk WWE as Gangrel, Edge & Christian BULLDOGS SIGNATURE MOVE: What the Funk? often entered into WWE events rising from underground surrounded by a circle of ames. They 1960 MEMBERS: Davey Boy Smith, Dynamite Kid As the only living, breathing, rompin’, crept to the ring as their leader sipped blood from his - COMBINED WT: 471 lbs. FROM: England stompin’, Funkasaurus in captivity, chalice and spit it out at the crowd. They often Brodus Clay brings a dangerous participated in bizarre rituals, intimidating and combination of domination and funk -69 frightening the weak. 2010 TITLE HISTORY with him each time he enters the ring. WORLD TAG TEAM Defeated Brutus Beefcake & Greg With the beautiful Naomi and Cameron Opponents were viewed as enemies from another CHAMPIONS Valentine on April 7, 1986 dancing at the big man’s side, it’s nearly world and often victims to their bloodbaths, which impossible not to smile when Clay occurred when the lights in the arena went out and a ▲ ▲ Behind the perfect combination of speed and power, the British makes his way to the ring. red light appeared. When the light came back the Bulldogs became one of the most popular tag teams of their time. victim was laying in the ring covered in blood. In early Clay’s opponents, however, have very Originally competing in promotions throughout Canada and Japan, 1999, they joined Undertaker’s Ministry of Darkness. -
Nac 2015045254501 White
BEFORE THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY In the Matter of DECISION Department of Enforcement, Complaint No. 2015045254501 Complainant, vs. Dated: July 26, 2019 Richard O. White Charlotte, North Carolina, Respondent. Respondent structured cash deposits to avoid federal reporting requirements. Held, findings affirmed and sanction modified. Appearances For the Complainant: Leo F. Orenstein, Esq., Joseph E. Strauss, Esq., Savvas A. Foukas, Esq., Tiffany A. Buxton, Esq., Department of Enforcement, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority For the Respondent: Nathan Zezula, Esq., Lueker Mott Zezula LLC Decision Richard O. White appeals a February 27, 2018 Hearing Panel decision. The Hearing Panel found that White knowingly structured cash deposits to evade the federal currency reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act, in violation of the high standards of ethical conduct imposed by FINRA Rule 2010. For his misconduct, the Hearing Panel barred White from associating with any FINRA member in any capacity. The primary issue on appeal is whether White, through his training at his member firm, knew about the relevant currency reporting requirements and then intentionally structured the cash deposits to evade reporting. A second issue is the appropriateness of the sanction imposed by the Hearing Panel. The Hearing Panel concluded that White acted knowingly and intentionally. After an independent review of the record, we agree with the liability findings of the Hearing Panel but modify the sanction it imposed. - 2 - I. Introduction The Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970 (a statute commonly referred to as the “Bank Secrecy Act” or “BSA”) requires U.S. financial institutions to assist U.S. -
United States Department of the Interior
United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge 4005 South Sandpiper Road Virginia Beach, VA 23456-4347 Residents of Sandbridge, Ocean Lakes, and Lago Mar Subdivisions with Water Access to Asheville Bridge Canal and Lake Tecumseh Virginia Beach, Virginia Re: Proposed Weirs on Lake Tecumseh, Virginia Beach, Virginia Dear Resident: You are invited to attend a public meeting on the proposed Lake Tecumseh weirs and berm rehabilitation project. The meetings will feature a presentation by Mr. Will Smith of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on the purpose and goals of the project followed by a question and answer period. The date, time and location of each meeting are listed below. DATE: Tuesday January 19th, 2010 TIME: 6-8 pm LOCATION: Oceans Lakes Clubhouse, 881 Old Dam Neck Road, Virginia Beach, Virginia DATE: Saturday January 23rd, 2010 TIME: 9-11am LOCATION: Asheville Bridge Creek Environmental Education Center, 3022 New Bridge Road, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23456 In addition, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers public comment period is open until February 8th, 2010. Please take this opportunity to contribute your comments by contacting the Corps via US Mail: Norfolk District, Corps of Engineers (ATTN: Katy Damico, CENAO-REG) 803 Front Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1096 via email: [email protected] We also invite you to obtain detailed information about the current proposal for Lake Tecumseh by visiting our website at http://www.fws.gov/northeast/virginiafield/partners/tecumseh.html. Please contact Will Smith of this office at (804) 693-6694, extension 124 or by email at [email protected] for further information. -
Intraparty in the US Congress.Pages
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2cd17764 Author Bloch Rubin, Ruth Frances Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ! ! ! ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! by! Ruth Frances !Bloch Rubin ! ! A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley ! Committee in charge: Professor Eric Schickler, Chair Professor Paul Pierson Professor Robert Van Houweling Professor Sean Farhang ! ! Fall 2014 ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! Copyright 2014 by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstract ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Eric Schickler, Chair The purpose of this dissertation is to supply a simple and synthetic theory to help us to understand the development and value of organized intraparty blocs. I will argue that lawmakers rely on these intraparty organizations to resolve several serious collective action and coordination problems that otherwise make it difficult for rank-and-file party members to successfully challenge their congressional leaders for control of policy outcomes. In the empirical chapters of this dissertation, I will show that intraparty organizations empower dissident lawmakers to resolve their collective action and coordination challenges by providing selective incentives to cooperative members, transforming public good policies into excludable accomplishments, and instituting rules and procedures to promote group decision-making. -
Bloch Rubin ! ! a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of The
! ! ! ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! by! Ruth Frances !Bloch Rubin ! ! A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley ! Committee in charge: Professor Eric Schickler, Chair Professor Paul Pierson Professor Robert Van Houweling Professor Sean Farhang ! ! Fall 2014 ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress ! ! Copyright 2014 by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Abstract ! Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress by Ruth Frances Bloch Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Eric Schickler, Chair The purpose of this dissertation is to supply a simple and synthetic theory to help us to understand the development and value of organized intraparty blocs. I will argue that lawmakers rely on these intraparty organizations to resolve several serious collective action and coordination problems that otherwise make it difficult for rank-and-file party members to successfully challenge their congressional leaders for control of policy outcomes. In the empirical chapters of this dissertation, I will show that intraparty organizations empower dissident lawmakers to resolve their collective action and coordination challenges by providing selective incentives to cooperative members, transforming public good policies into excludable accomplishments, and instituting rules and procedures to promote group decision-making. And, in tracing the development of intraparty organization through several well-known examples of party infighting, I will demonstrate that intraparty organizations have played pivotal — yet largely unrecognized — roles in critical legislative battles, including turn-of-the-century economic struggles, midcentury battles over civil rights legislation, and contemporary debates over national health care policy. -
WWE® Reports 2012 Third Quarter Results
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contacts: Investors: Michael Weitz 203-352-8642 Media: Tara Carraro 203-352-8625 WWE® Reports 2012 Third Quarter Results STAMFORD, Conn., November 1, 2012 - WWE (NYSE:WWE) today announced financial results for its third quarter ended September 30, 2012. Revenues totaled $104.2 million as compared to $108.5 million in the prior year quarter. Operating income was $5.0 million as compared to $15.9 million in the prior year quarter. Net income was $3.5 million, or $0.05 per share, as compared to $10.6 million, or $0.14 per share, in the prior year quarter. Excluding items that impacted comparability on a year-over-year basis, Adjusted Operating income was $7.1 million as compared to $21.0 million in the prior year quarter, and Adjusted Net income was $5.0 million, or $0.07 per share, as compared to $14.1 million, or $0.19 per share, in the prior year quarter. The decline in earnings, on both an "As Reported" and "Adjusted" basis, was driven by $6.6 million in incremental expenses from the return to a more normalized level of management incentive compensation in the current year quarter compared to a reduced level of management incentive compensation in the prior year quarter, a reduction in net home video revenue, and lower video game sales primarily from one fewer video game release in the current year quarter. “In the third quarter, we continued to make important progress on our key strategic initiatives, expanding our content and distribution and enhancing our brand strength,” stated Vince McMahon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. -
SWORN to BEFORE ME and Subscrjbeermmy PRESENCE, THIS 2D DAY of FEBRUARY, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.: 25 COMPLAINT PAUL SIMPKINS, Title 18 U.S.C, Sec. 371- Defendant. Conspiracy To Commit Bribery The undersigned complainant being duly sworn states: Beginning no later than May 2006, and continuing through at least September 2012, defendant PAUL SIMPKINS, a public official, and others did knowingly and unlawfully combine, conspire, and agree to commit bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section, 201(b)(2)(A), and SIMPKINS and his co-conspirators took overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy; all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. This criminal complaint is based on the attached affidavit, which is incorporated herein by reference. Cordell DeLaPena, Special Agent, DCIS SWORN TO BEFORE ME AND SUBSCRJBEErmMY PRESENCE, THIS 2d DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015. / / /L/\ The Honorable Karen S. Crawford United States Magistrate Judge AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I, CORDELL DELAPENA, being duly sworn, hereby depose and state as follows: AFFIANT 1. I am a Special Agent with the Department of Defense, Office of Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service ("DOS"), Long Beach Resident Agency. I have been so employed since August 2012. Prior to my employment with DCIS, I was a Special Agent with the U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Inspector General for approximately four years. I have received training in the investigation of various financial and white collar crimes and I have personally conducted or assisted in the investigation of violations of U.S. law including bribery, kickbacks, public corruption, conspiracy, theft, money laundering, conflicts of interest, mail fraud, and antitrust violations. -
How Power Shifted from Parliament to the Banking Sector the Democratic Deficit in Banking | 2 Contents
BANKING VS DEMOCRACY how power shifted from parliament to the banking sector The Democratic Deficit in Banking | 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Ceding the Power to Create Money to the Banking Sector 4 Overstating the True Contribution of the Banking Sector 5 No Accountability to Customers 5 The Close Relationship Between Banking & Government 5 Policy Implications 6 INTRODUCTION 7 1. A LICENCE TO PRINT MONEY 9 How Do Banks Create Money? 9 Privatisation by Stealth? 10 How Did We Get to this Point? 10 Democratic Questions We Need to Ask about Money 12 2. CONFUSED BY LARGE NUMBERS 17 Benefits of the Banking Sector 17 Costs of the Banking Sector 18 Subsidies to the Banks 19 Overall Contribution of the Banking Sector 19 Are the Banks’ Threats to Leave Credible? 20 3. NOT IN OUR NAME 21 The Problem, Multiplied 22 The Power to Shape the Economy 22 4. IN BED TOGETHER 24 Lobbying 24 Funding 25 The Revolving Door 25 Is the Close Relationship a Help or a Hindrance? 27 5. SIMPLE SOLUTIONS 28 Simple Change 1: Separate Risky Money from Safe Money 28 Simple Change 2: Make Banks Disclose How Customers’ Money Will Be Used 29 Simple Change 3: Prohibit the Creation of Money by Private Sector Banks 29 CONcluSION 31 NOTES & REFERENCES 32 www.positivemoney.org.uk The Democratic Deficit in Banking | 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY his report asks if power has shifted from Westminster down the river to the TCity of London. What we find is a banking system that has more ‘spending power’ than the democratically elected government, no accountability to the people, and massive concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals.