DOCSLIB.ORG

Lookout Region Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lookout Region Management Plan Lookout Region Management Plan Includes Apex Park, Lookout Mountain Nature Center and Preserve, and Matthews/Winters Park Lookout Region Management Plan Executive Summary Jefferson County Open Space 2013 ii APPROVAL PAGE Management Planning is an on-going process. Plans will never be considered “completed,” although, they will be reviewed periodically so they take into account environmental, social and political changes and reflect those changes. Having reviewed its contents, this ________________________ (Name of Region) Management Plan, drafted in and revised in ___________ (date), has been adopted by the planning team members. Signature Date ____________________________, _______________________ __________ Regional Park Supervisor ____________________________, _______________________ __________ Regional Planning Coordinator Lookout Region Management Plan Executive Summary Jefferson County Open Space 2013 i Table of Contents Executive Summary: Lookout Region Parks Management Plan ................................................................. vii Chapter 1: Jefferson County Open Space Management Planning ............................................................ 12 Chapter 2: Detailed Information on Apex Park ............................................................................................ 6 Park Vision ............................................................................................................................... 6 Location.................................................................................................................................... 6 Chronology of Development .................................................................................................... 7 Amenities ................................................................................................................................. 8 Park Capacity ........................................................................................................................... 8 Historical Background .............................................................................................................. 8 Natural and Cultural Resources ............................................................................................. 11 Activities ................................................................................................................................. 13 Visitation & Use Trends ......................................................................................................... 13 Location Map ......................................................................................................................... 14 Park Map ................................................................................................................................ 15 Acquisition History Map ......................................................................................................... 17 Management Context ................................................................................................................ i Management Unit Designation Map ...................................................................................... 21 Agreements Table .................................................................................................................. 22 Work Plan Summary .............................................................................................................. 23 Actions Map ........................................................................................................................... 24 Action Items ........................................................................................................................... 25 Discussion Items .................................................................................................................... 30 Chapter 3: Detailed Information on Lookout Mountain Nature Center and Preserve ................................ 33 Park Vision ............................................................................................................................. 33 Location.................................................................................................................................. 33 Lookout Region Management Plan Executive Summary Jefferson County Open Space 2013 ii Chronology of Development .................................................................................................. 34 Amenities ............................................................................................................................... 36 Park Capacity ......................................................................................................................... 36 Historical Background ............................................................................................................ 37 Natural and Cultural Resources ............................................................................................. 39 Activities ................................................................................................................................. 42 Visitation & Use Trends ......................................................................................................... 43 Location Map ......................................................................................................................... 45 Park Map ................................................................................................................................ 46 Acquisition History Map ......................................................................................................... 47 Management Context ................................................................................................................ i Management Unit Designation Map ...................................................................................... 50 Agreements Table .................................................................................................................. 51 Work Plan Summary .............................................................................................................. 52 Actions Map ........................................................................................................................... 53 Action Items ........................................................................................................................... 54 Discussion Items .................................................................................................................... 58 Chapter 4: Detailed Information on Matthews/Winters Park ...................................................................... 64 Park Vision ............................................................................................................................. 64 Location.................................................................................................................................. 64 Chronology of Development .................................................................................................. 64 Amenities ............................................................................................................................... 66 Park Capacity ......................................................................................................................... 66 Historical Background ............................................................................................................ 66 Natural and Cultural Resources ............................................................................................. 67 Activities ................................................................................................................................. 68 Visitation & Use Trends ......................................................................................................... 68 Location Map ......................................................................................................................... 70 Lookout Region Management Plan Executive Summary Jefferson County Open Space 2013 iii Park Map ................................................................................................................................ 71 Acquisition History Map ........................................................................................................ 72 Management Context ................................................................................................................ i Management Unit Designation Map ...................................................................................... 76 Agreements Table .................................................................................................................. 77 Work Plan Summary .............................................................................................................. 78 Actions Map ........................................................................................................................... 80 Action Items ........................................................................................................................... 81 Discussion Items .................................................................................................................... 82 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 the Denver Mountain Parks System 56
    Chapter 4 The Denver Mountain Parks System 56 The Denver Mountain Parks System The Denver Mountain Parks The System 57 Chapter 4 The Denver Mountain Parks System 4.A. Systemwide Recommendations Recreation Recommendations Background Today, those who visit the Denver Mountain Parks (DMP) represent a broad cross section of people in demographics, where they reside, and how far they travel to enjoy these mountain lands. Visitors to the Mountain Parks are cosmopolitan – a true mix of cultures and languages. With the exception of African-Americans being under- represented, the Mountain Parks reflect the same diversity of age and ethnicity as occurs at Denver’s urban parks. Although visitors to the Mountain Parks represent the spectrum, many come from low to middle income households. Typically one third of those who visit either a Denver Mountain Park or another county open space park are Denver residents. Another third reside in the county in which the park is located. The last third are visitors from other counties along the Front Range, visitors from other parts of the state and nation, and international visitors. Together, mountain open space lands owned by Denver, Jefferson County, Douglas County, and Clear Creek County are used recipro- cally. Together, they are a regional Front Range open space sys- tem where each county provides its own lands and facilities for the enjoyment of its own residents, recognizing that these lands are also enjoyed by all visitors. The goal for Denver Mountain Parks is to provide the amenities and programs that take advantage of but do not diminish the valu- Red Rocks Park able natural and cultural resources and that meet today’s recre- ation needs and desire to connect kids with nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver's Mountain Parks Foundation Kicks Off Capital Campaign
    Est. 1970 + Vol ume 45 + Number 4 + fall 2016 The picnic shelter in Filius Park is an excellent example of the Denver Mountain Parks rustic architectural style. Many of these shelters have been neglected and are now in severe disrepair. Photo courtesy: Denver Public Library, Western History Collection Denver’s Mountain Parks Foundation Kicks Off Capital Campaign By Becca Dierschow, Preservation and Research Coordinator was a bold move, but one that the voters of Denver heartily supported. In 1912, In 1916, Denver released a series of tourism booklets promoting the newly the citizens of Denver passed a mill levy that funded the purchase and maintenance formed Denver Mountain Parks system. These 18 page, full color pamphlets of the parks system until 1955. illustrate many features of the Mountain Parks system that are well-known today To create a master plan for the proposed system, Denver tapped the most – Bergen Park, the winding Lariat Loop leading up to Lookout Mountain, and the prominent landscape architecture firm in the country – the Olmsted Brothers. The buffalo herd grazing in Genesee Park. All of these amenities, the pamphlets boast- sons of renowned landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted, John and Frederick ed, were an easy car ride from Denver. Picnic shelters, fire pits, and well houses Jr carried on their father’s legacy and vastly expanded the firm’s reputation in their welcomed visitors and provided a place of respite from city living. own right. Frederick Olmsted Jr came to Denver in 1912 to oversee the planning The Denver Mountain Parks system was first proposed as early as 1901, as of the Denver Zoo, Civic Center, and City Park, along with the city-wide parkways part of a state-wide trend of preserving natural landscapes for the benefit of urban system.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Parks Parkways
    MMuunniicciippaall PPaarrkkss aanndd PPaarrkkwwaayyss IN THE CCOOLLOORRAADDOO SSTTAATTEE RREEGGIISSTTEERR OF HHIISSTTOORRIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Colorado Historical Society DIRECTORY OF MMuunniicciippaall PPaarrkkss aanndd PPaarrkkwwaayyss IN THE CCOOLLOORRAADDOO SSTTAATTEE RREEGGIISSTTEERR OOFF HHIISSTTOORRIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS Includes Colorado properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places and the State Register of Historic Properties Updated Through December 2006 Prepared By Lisa Werdel © 2006 Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Colorado Historical Society 1300 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203-2137 www.coloradohistory-oahp.org The Colorado State Register of Historic Properties is a program of the Colorado Historical Society. Founded in 1879, the Colorado Historical Society brings the unique character of Colorado's past to more than a million people each year through historical museums and highway markers, exhibitions, manuscript and photograph collections, popular and scholarly publications, historical and archaeological preservation services, and educational programs for children and adults. The Society collects, preserves, and interprets the history of Colorado for present and future generations. A nonprofit agency with its own membership, the Society is also a state institution located within Colorado's Department of Higher Education The Colorado Historical Society operates twelve historic sites and museums at ten locations around the state, including
    [Show full text]
  • C Lear Creek GIS C Ounty
    Creek G ilpin C o unty D D D 12147 D Jefferson County G ty Gilpin County rand Coun ICE LAKE D OHMAN LAKE STEUART LAKE D D REYNOLDS LAKE D D 13391 LAKE CAROLINELOCH LOMAND ST MARYS GLACIER Fox Mountain ST MARYS DLAKE FALL RIVER SILVER LAKE D D LAKE QUIVIRA 11239 13130 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR SLATER LAKE D SILVER CREEK SHERWIN LAKECHINNS LAKE Witter Peak D D 12884 D D James Peak Wilderness MEXICAN GULCH D ETHEL LAKEBYRON LAKE D D BILL MOORE LAKE HAMLIN GULCH D D 13132 CUMBERLAND GULCH D MILL CREEK D D Russell Peak Breckinridge Peak Berthoud Pass D D 12889 G D D ilp D in D C D ou n ty D Grand C D D ounty D MAD CREEK LION CREEK D Stanley Mountain YORK GULCH D D FALL RIVER 12521 BLUE CREEK Cone Mountain D D HOOP CREEK 12244 SPRING GULCH Red Elephant Hill D 10316 D ¤£US 40 D CLEAR CREEK This map is visual representation only, do not use Bellevue Mountain URAD RESERVOIR (LOWER) for legal purposes. Map is not survey accurate and ¨¦§I 70 D WEST FORK CLEAR CREEK 9863 Seaton Mountain may not comply with National Mapping Accuracy Red Mountain D D GUANELLA RESERVOIR 9105 12315 EMPIRE n County Standards. Map is based on best available data as Gilpi RUBY CREEK Ball Mountain Douglas Mountain of October, 2018 . BUTLER GULCH CENTRAL CITY D D VIRGINIA CANYON Lincoln Mountain GEORGIA GULCH 12529 9550 OHIO GULCH WOODS CREEK D GILSON GULCH Engelmann Peak 10363 TURKEY GULCH D IDAHO HASSELL LAKEURAD RESERVOIR (UPPER) 13362 BARD CREEK LAKE SILVER CREEK TRAIL CREEK J e US 6 f f ¤£ e r s o BARD CREEK SPRINGS n Flirtation Peak C Robeson Peak Columbia Mountain o ty
    [Show full text]
  • M a S T E R P L
    MASTER PLAN 2008 2 Acknowledgments Mayor John W. Hickenlooper Kevin Patterson, Manager of Denver Parks and Recreation Bart Berger, President of the Denver Mountain Parks Foundation Gary Walter, Douglas County Public Works Primary authors: Bert Weaver, Clear Creek County Susan Baird, Tina Bishop Denver City Council Members: Dave Webster, President, Inter-Neighborhood Cooperation Carol Boigan Tom Wooten, Ross Consulting Charlie Brown Melanie Worley, Douglas County Commissioner Editors: Jeanne Faatz Dick Wulf, Director, Evergreen Park & Recreation District Sally White, Susan Baird Rick Garcia Frank Young, Clear Creek Open Space Michael Hancock Marcia Johnson Contributing authors and editors: Peggy Lehmann Roundtable Experts: Bart Berger, Jude O’Connor, A.J. Tripp-Addison Doug Linkhart Anne Baker-Easley, Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado Paul D. López Deanne Buck, Access Fund Thanks to: Curt Carlson, Colorado Parks & Recreation Association Carla Madison Barnhart Communications, Denver Mountain Parks Judy Montero Erik Dyce, Theatres and Arenas Foundation, and The Parks People. Chris Nevitt Colleen Gadd, Jefferson County Open Space Jeanne Robb Mark Guebert-Stewart, Recreational Equipment, Inc. Karen Hardesty, Colorado Division of Wildlife Photos: Fabby Hillyard, LODO District Historic photos courtesy of the Denver Public Library Western History Master Plan Advisory Group: Diane Hitchings, USDA Forest Service Collection (DPL-WHC), Barbara Teyssier Forrest Collection, and Denver Mountain Parks file photos. Co-chair Peggy Lehmann, Denver City Councilwoman Gerhard Holtzendorf, Recreational Equipment, Inc. Co-chair Landri Taylor Tim Hutchens, Denver Parks & Recreation, Outdoor Rec Other photos contributed by Susan Baird, Bart Berger, Tina Bishop, Cheryl Armstrong, CEO, Beckwourth Mt. Club Michelle Madrid-Montoya, Denver Parks & Recreation Michael Encinias, Micah Klaver, Bill Mangel, Jessica Miller, Pat Mundus, Tad Bowman, Theatres and Arenas Bryan Martin, Colorado Mountain Club Jude O’Connor, Glen Richardson, Ken Sherbenou, Mike Strunk, A.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver's Mountain Playground: the Denver
    DENVER’S MOUNTAIN PLAYGROUND: THE DENVER MOUNTAIN PARKS, THE CITY BEAUTIFUL, AND THE RISE OF MODERN WILDERNESS RECREATION IN COLORADO, 1900-1940 by WENDY REX-ATZET B.A., University of Utah, 1990 M.A., San Diego State University, 1999 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History 2011 This thesis entitled: Denver’s Mountain Playground: The Denver Mountain Parks, the City Beautiful, and the Rise of Modern Wilderness Recreation in Colorado, 1900-1940 written by Wendy Rex-Atzet has been approved for the Department of History __________________________________ Peter Boag, Committee Chair __________________________________ Marcia Yonemoto __________________________________ Virginia Anderson Date: May 5, 2011 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. IRB protocol # 0107.44 iii Rex-Atzet, Wendy (Ph.D., History) Denver’s Mountain Playground: The Denver Mountain Parks, the City Beautiful, and the Rise of Modern Wilderness Recreation in Colorado, 1900-1940 Thesis directed by Professor Peter Boag ABSTRACT The history of the Denver Mountain Parks exposes the profound connections between city life and scenic preservation, outdoor recreation, and wilderness appreciation during the early twentieth century. By examining the cultural roots of Denver’s mountain parks this study links the conservation and preservation movements of the Progressive Era to specifically urban concerns. Denver’s history highlights the central role that urban reform, urban planning, and municipal politics played in shaping the scenic natural landscape parks of these years.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Evans Geographic Area 40,787 NFS Acres 313 Non-NFS Acres 41,100 Total Acres
    Fii2.21 Mount Evans Geographic Area 40,787 NFS Acres 313 Non-NFS Acres 41,100 Total Acres ManagementArea~onAUocation 1.1 -w- 38,649 12 - Recornmended for Wildetness 161 2.2 -ReseatchN&dAteas 154 4.2 -scenery 1,823 Geographic Area Direction e MOUNT EVANS GEOGRAPHIC AREA Setting The area consists of a portion of Mount Evans Wilderness and the Mount Evans National Scenic Byway corridor bisecting the wilderness area, between Echo Lake and the summit of Mount Evans. This geographic area covers the northem half of the wilderness area, in the Arapaho National Forests; the southern portion, in the Pike National Forest, is not included. The area also includes the Mount Goliath Botanical Area, which contains a large old-growth stand of bristlecone pine. The area includes two Denver Mountain Parks. The area encompasses the upper north and east faces of Mount Evans with elevations ranging from 8,600 feet to the Mount Evans summit at 14,264 feet. Approximately one-third of the area is above timberline and consists of alpine meadow and rock. The lower portions contain mostly subalpine forests of spruce and fir and lodgepole pine. The lowest areas contain a small component of aspen and ponderosa pine. Significant bristlecone pine stands occur at elevations from 11,000 to 12,000 feet. The area provides important summer habitat for elk, and the upper elevations are habitat for a reintroduced population of mountain goat. Mount Evans National Scenic Byway (Colorado Highway 5) is the highest paved road in North America, reaching the summit of Mount Evans.
    [Show full text]
  • Historically Jeffco Magazine 2012
    Issue 33, 2012 Historically Je ff co Historically Je ff co Mall visionary Gerri von Frellick, circa 1967, at Villa Italia Courtesy Lakewood’s Heritage Center, City of Lakewood Contents 2 Fortress Commerce: Jefferson County’s Malls Rosemary Lewis 8 A Modern Revolution in Historic Preservation Sally White 11 Applewood – an Orchard of Apple Trees Marian Metsopoulos 13 All It Took Was One Ad Writers’ Award Winner, First Place, Adult Long Essay Matthew Prythero 16 Golden Cemetery National Register of Historic Places Richard Gardner 17 Ralston Cemetery State Register of Historic Places Matthew Prythero 18 Norman and Ethel Meyer Award for Historic Preservation in Jefferson County Deborah Andrews 20 Jefferson County Hall of Fame: John C. Bandimere, Jr. Viona ‘Vi’ Mae Hader 21 The Humphrey Memorial Park and Museum Writers’ Award Winner, First Place, Adult Short Essay Lois Lange 23 Step Back in Time at the Humphrey Museum Margaret T. Chapman 25 Wildfire History in Jefferson County List of Fires Published by the Jefferson County Jeffco’s First Major Wildfire Historical Commission (JCHC) Historic Consequences of Early Fires Chair: Rose Lewis Richard Gardner JCHC Publications Committee Farewell to the Lamb School Co-editors of Historically Jeffco: Milly Roeder Margaret T. Chapman, Sally L. White Design & Layout: Doyle Harrison 31 Territorial Capitol Anniversary Issue 33, 2012 Richard Gardner ISSN 1532-6047 32 Historic Places in Transition 34 Denver Mountain Parks Centennial Celebrates a Legacy of History Sally White, Denver Mountain Parks, and Jay Clark, Marketing & Communications, Denver Parks and Recreation 37 Jefferson County Historical Commission 2012 Rosemary Lewis Please note: A revised version of the 2011 article The Rhubarb Festival at Pine Grove, by David Nelson, has been posted on the web site at HistoricJeffco.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Evergreen Trails Master Plan Final Plan December 2015
    Evergreen Trails Master Plan Final Plan December 2015 December 2015 | Final Plan Evergreen Trails Master Plan Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS __________________________________i A. INTRODUCTION __________________________________ A-1 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS ____________________________ B-1 C. COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT _________ C-1 D. RECOMMENDATIONS ______________________________ D-1 Wayfinding Signage ____________________________ D-32 E. IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE _______________ E-1 Appendix A. Jefferson County Open Space Trail Maps ________ a-i Appendix B. Cost Estimates ____________________________ b-i Appendix C. Right-of-Way Mapping ______________________ c-i i Evergreen Trails Master Plan December 2015 | Final Plan ii December 2015 | Final Plan Evergreen Trails Master Plan Acknowledgements The Evergreen Trails Master Plan was funded through Greater Outdoors Colorado funds (GOCO), and managed by the Greater Downtown Evergreen Economic District (DEED), in partnership with Jefferson County Transportation and Engineering staff. The Evergreen Parks and Recreation District provided in-kind contributions of staff time and meeting space. Project Partners Technical Working Group Great Outdoors Colorado Grant Funding Kevin French, Jefferson County Transportation & Engineering Director Downtown Evergreen Economic District Scott Burton, Planner, Jefferson County Jefferson County Transportation and Engineering Transportation & Engineering Jefferson County Planning and Zoning Yelena Onnen, Planner, Jefferson County Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • At First Glance It May Appear That the Denver Mountain Parks Are Unrelated Parcels Scattered Across Four Counties. but the Reali
    The Places of the Denver Mountain Parks The Places 81 4.B The Places: Recommendations for Individual Parks At first glance it may appear that the Denver Mountain Parks are unrelated parcels scattered across four counties. But the reality is that the individual parks comprise a cohesive system of significant lands connected by watersheds, forests, sensitive ecosystems, trails, and scenic drives. Each park has its own distinct character, but the system as a whole shares an audience, uses, geography, character, and historic integrity. These similarities offer a way of organizing the parks into four tiers, for ease in providing recommendations and for better understanding the role that each park plays in the larger system. The four broad tiers of the Denver Mountain Parks are: The Stars Red Rocks, Lookout Mountain, Echo Lake, Summit Lake, and Winter Park The Hearts Genesee, Dedisse, Newton, and Daniels Lookout Mountain Park The Picnic Parks Little, Corwina/O’Fallon/Pence (along Bear Creek), Bell and Cub Creek (along those creeks), BINDING EDGE Fillius, Bergen, and Turkey Creek Conservation/Wilderness Parks The 24 undeveloped parcels, initially set aside for their resource value, often surrounded by private property with no access, and with the potential of O’Fallon Park offering some limited recreation in the future. (Listed on page 144.) Dedisse Park “The system is unique in that the creation of it is the first instance on record of an American city establishing a Park and camping grounds twenty to thirty miles beyond its own borders. Denver has brought her own Mountain scenery to her own doors.” —Denver and Her Mountain Parks, circa 1918-20 82 4.B.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary 2
    Executive Summary 2 CLEAR CREEK COUNTY TYPE ACRES Parks at a Glance Echo Lake Park 616.3 Summit Lake Park 161.83 Forsberg Conservation 1.91 Denver Mountain Parks Facts Hicks Mountain Conservation 840 Mt. Judge Conservation 360 • 14,141 acres of parks Pence Mountain Conservation 560 • 22 developed parks Snyder Mountain Conservation 240 • 24 conservation/wilderness areas Total acres in Clear Creek 2780.04 JEFFERSON COUNTY TYPE ACRES • 4 counties: Clear Creek, Douglas, Jefferson, Grand Bell Park 480 • 70% of Denver Park and Recreation’s 20,000-acre system Bergen Park 25.431 • 1% of the department’s operating budget and 3% of its capital Colorow Point Park 0.537 budget (2007) Corwina Park 297.82 • 68% of Denver residents visit a DMP at least once a year Cub Creek and Dillon Park 549.14 Dedisse Park 420.42 (Game Plan Survey) Deer Creek Park 89.7 • Open space preserved beginning in 1912 Fillius Park 107.674 • Genesee Park first (1912) and largest park (2,413 acres) Genesee Park 2412.72 • Genesee Outdoor Experiential Center Katherine Craig Park 56 • Colorow Point smallest park (0.5 acres) Little Park 400.34 Lookout Mountain Park 66.11 • Highest city park in the USA: Summit Lake (13,000 feet) Newton Park 431 • Two bison herds, related to the last herds at Yellowstone O’Fallon Park 860 National Park Pence Park 320 • Two of the metro area’s top ten tourist attractions: Buffalo Bill’s Red Rocks Park 804.19 Grave & Museum and Red Rocks Park & Amphitheatre Starbuck Park 11.13 Turkey Creek Park 61 • Major parks and scenic roads listed on the National
    [Show full text]
  • Lfu APR 031990' NATIONAL NFS Form 10-900B OMB No
    Lfu APR 031990' NATIONAL NFS Form 10-900b OMB No. (Rev. 8/86) NPS/CHS Word Processor Format: (Approved 03/88) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. Use letter quality printers in 12 pitch. Use only 25% or greater cotton content bond paper. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Denver Mountain Parks B- Associated Historic Contexts Denver Mountain Parks, Denver, Colorado 1912 - 1941 C. Geographical Data_______________________________________ Entire Denver Mountain Park System: Within the Counties of: Jefferson, Clear Creek, Douglas, and Grand. Adjacent to the towns and cities of: Bergen Park, Evergreen, Kittredge, Idledale, Morrison, Indian Hills, Conifer, and Winter Park. ( )See continuation sheet D- Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of Interior's S^aHw^ards for Planning and Evaluation. Signature of certifying official Date State Historic Preservation Officer State or Federal agency and bureau It hereby, certify that this multiple property form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]