9 Sivan 1807.Dwd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Difference Between Blessing (Bracha) and Prayer (Tefilah)
1 The Difference between Blessing (bracha) and Prayer (tefilah) What is a Bracha? On the most basic level, a bracha is a means of recognizing the good that God has given to us. As the Talmud2 states, the entire world belongs to God, who created everything, and partaking in His creation without consent would be tantamount to stealing. When we acknowledge that our food comes from God – i.e. we say a bracha – God grants us permission to partake in the world's pleasures. This fulfills the purpose of existence: To recognize God and come close to Him. Once we have been satiated, we again bless God, expressing our appreciation for what He has given us.3 So, first and foremost, a bracha is a "please" and a "thank you" to the Creator for the sustenance and pleasure He has bestowed upon us. The Midrash4 relates that Abraham's tent was pitched in the middle of an intercity highway, and open on all four sides so that any traveler was welcome to a royal feast. Inevitably, at the end of the meal, the grateful guests would want to thank Abraham. "It's not me who you should be thanking," Abraham replied. "God provides our food and sustains us moment by moment. To Him we should give thanks!" Those who balked at the idea of thanking God were offered an alternative: Pay full price for the meal. Considering the high price for a fabulous meal in the desert, Abraham succeeded in inspiring even the skeptics to "give God a try." Source of All Blessing Yet the essence of a bracha goes beyond mere manners. -
On Changing the Immutable by Marc B. Shapiro,The History and Dating
וְהָאֱמֶת וְהַשָּׁלוֹם On Changing the ;אֱהָבוּ Immutable by Marc B. Shapiro On Changing the Immutable by ;וְהָאֱמֶת וְהַשָּׁלוֹם אֱהָבוּ Marc B. Shapiro By Yitzchok Stroh Professor Marc Shapiro’s latest work, Changing the Immutable, contains considerable interesting and pertinent information for the student of Jewish history. As stated on the cover, the author attempts to reveal how the (Jewish) orthodox ‘establishment’ silences both past and present dissenting voices through “Orthodox Judaism Rewriting Its History.” I don’t intend this to be a review of the entire work (that would take a lot more time and space), however I did want to share some of my frustration here, because I sense that the author’s bias affected his objectivity, and I am afraid that many a reader will be left with an impression that in many ways does not reflect the reality of this complex topic. In this article, I would like to examine one passage of Shapiro’s work to illustrate this point. In chapter eight, entitled, “Is the truth really that important?” Shapiro writes: Because my purpose in this chapter is to chart the outer limits of what has been viewed as acceptable when it comes to falsehood and deception. I will be focusing on the more ‘liberal’ positions. My aim is to show just how far some rabbinic decisors were willing to go in sanctioning deviations from the truth. One must bear in mind, however, that there are often views in opposition to the ones I shall be examining. Perhaps this knowledge can serve as a counterweight to the shock that many readers will experience upon learning of some of the positions I will mention. -
New York 2011 JCRC Williamsburg, Hasidic Community.Pdf
September, 2013 2 THROUGH THE DECADES Williamsburg: a Jewish neighborhood 3 Since the opening of the Williamsburg Bridge in 1903, Williamsburg has been the home of a substantial Jewish community.. Source: Prof. Paul Ritterband Through the ‘60’s – a diverse Jewish neighborhood Politically active Williamsburg Demographics: 1960-1990 Bridge White Hispanic 19601960 19701970 19801980 19901990 7 CURRENT DEMOGRAPHY Sources: U.S. Census and UJO of Williamsburg 8 Using Computer scans of voter registration lists to determine the “contours” of Jewish Williamsburg Expanding southward and eastward, •Williamsburg Hasidic •North Side- Williamsburg South Side now includes significant •Bedford portions of the •Clinton Hill neighborhoods of: Sources: NYC Department of City Planning and Prime NY 9 UJA-Federation Jewish Community Study of New York: 2011 Williamsburg (11211, 11205, 11206) 2002 2011 Jewish 11,800 18,600 households Persons in Jewish 57,600 77,100 households Jewish persons 52,700 74,500 Orthodox Jews 61,000 Non-Orthodox 13,500 Jews Comparing Jewish Community Study, 2011 zip clusters to Jewish voter concentrations. Williamsburg, Clinton Hill & Bedford Stuyvesant Population growth to the south and east Horizontal Vertical Vertical Population change in the Williamsburg area Total Population White Nonhispanic Population Population Change Percent Change Change Percent Change Population 2010 2010 2000‐2010 2000‐2010 2000‐2010 2000‐2010 Williamsburg 32,926 657 2% 28,366 5,041 22% North Side- 45,774 5,644 14% 23,968 10,245 75% South Side Bedford 70,713 11,486 19% 18,054 15,594 634% Clinton Hill 34,791 1,499 5% 12,389 7,419 149% The census • The population in all four neighborhoods grew, but the data, as White Nonhispanic population reported by exploded. -
Philo Ng.Pdf
PHILO AND THE NAMES OF GOD By A. MARMORSTEIN,Jews College, London IN A recent work on the allegorical exegesis of Philo of Alexandria' Philo's views and teachings as to the Hebrew names of God are once more discussed and analyzed. The author repeats and shares the old opinion, elaborated and propagated by Zacharias Frankel and others that Philo was more or less ignorant of the Hebrew tongue. Philo's treat- ment of the divine names is put in the first line of witnesses to corroborate this literary verdict. This question touches wider and more important problems than the narrow ques- tion whether Philo knew Hebrew, or not,2 and if the former is the case how far his knowledge, and if the latter is true how far his ignorance went. For the theologians generally some important historical and theological problems, for Jewish theology especially, besides these, literary and relig- ious questions as to the date and origin of religious concep- tions, and the antiquity and value of our sources are involved. Philo is criticized for having no idea2 of the equivalent names used by the LXX for the Tetragrammaton and Elohim respectively. The former is translated KVptOS, the latter 4hos. This omission is the more serious since the distinction between these two names is one of Philo's chief doctrines. We are referred to a remark made by Z. Frankel about ' Edmund Stein, Die allegorische Exegese des Philo aus Alexandreia; Giessen, 1929. (Beihefte Zur ZAW. No. 51.) 2 Ibid., p. 20, for earlier observations see G. Dalman, Adonaj, 59.1, Daehne, Geschichtliche Darstellung, I 231, II 51; Freiidenthal, Alexander Polyhistor, p. -
Was the Chasam Sofer Inconsistent? a Review Essay
239 Setting the Record Straight: Was the Chasam Sofer Inconsistent? A Review Essay By: NOSSON DOVID RABINOWICH In this essay we will discuss claims made in two recent articles, published by two leading scholars, to the effect that the Chasam Sofer was inconsistent and contradicted himself. I will attempt to show that those supposed “contradictions and inconsistencies” are either simply nonexistent or can be properly explained by careful and deliberate analysis of the actual sources and the issues involved. While my respect for Rabbi Moshe Sofer, the late “Chasam Sofer,” of blessed memory, is not merely that reserved for a great rabbi and outstanding scholar, I have endeavored to maintain a balanced and critical approach throughout. Nevertheless I feel it appropriate to note that from my perspective, Rabbi Sofer was a holy rabbi, a saint if you wish, whose towering scholarship in so many areas of Jewish studies was unmatched by his peers or by any rabbi from any subsequent generation. I do not hesitate to apply to him this popular saying: “From R. Moshe [Ben-Maimon; Maimonidies] until [R.] Moshe [Sofer] there was no one of the stature of R. Moshe [Sofer].”1 1 As the halakhic authority of his generation, he was probably more prolific than any other rabbi going back six hundred years, since the leading halakhic authority of the Golden Age in Spain, Rabbi Shlomo ben Aderet. Of R. Sofer’s peers, only Rabbi Yosef Shaul Nathanson, She-elot Sho’el U’Maishiv, was known to have written more responsa. ______________________________________________________ Nosson Dovid Rabinowich is the Mara d'Asra of Beis Medrash Ahavas Torah, a prolific author, and teacher. -
Chassidus on the Chassidus on the Parsha +
LIGHTS OF OUR RIGHTEOUS TZADDIKIM בעזרת ה ' יתבר A Tzaddik, or righteous person , makes everyone else appear righteous before Hashem by advocating for them and finding their merits. Kedushas Levi, Parshas Noach (Bereishis 7:1) VA’ES CHA NAN _ CHASSIDUS ON THE PARSHA + Dvar Torah Deciphered Messages The Torah tells us ( Shemos 19:19) that when the Jewish people gathered at Mount Sinai to receive the Torah , “Moshe spoke and Hashem answered him with a voice.” The Gemora (Berochos 45a) der ives from this pasuk the principle that that an interpreter should not speak more loudly than the reader whose words he is translating. Tosafos immediately ask the obvious question: from that pasuk we see actually see the opposite: that the reader should n ot speak more loudly than the interpreter. We know, says Rav Levi Yitzchok, that Moshe’s nevua (prophecy) was different from that of the other nevi’im (prophets) in that “the Shechina was speaking through Moshe’s throat”. This means that the interpretation of the nevuos of the other nevi’im is not dependent on the comprehension of the people who hear it. The nevua arrives in this world in the mind of the novi and passes through the filter of his perspectives. The resulting message is the essence of the nevua. When Moshe prophesied, however, it was as if the Shechina spoke from his throat directly to all the people on their particular level of understanding. Consequently, his nevuos were directly accessible to all people. In this sense then, Moshe was the rea der of the nevua , and Hashem was the interpreter. -
Edward Steichen in München: Wir Alle – the Family of Man in Der Städtischen Galerie Im Lenbachhaus, 1955
Edward Steichen in München: Wir alle – The Family of Man in der Städtischen Galerie im Lenbachhaus, 1955 von Werner Sollors (Harvard University) für online seit: 17.08.2020 1 Edward Steichen in München: Wir alle – The Family of Man in der Städtischen Galerie im Lenbachhaus, 19551 Vor 65 Jahren, vom 19. November bis 18. Dezember 1955, wurde die von Edward Steichen zusammengestellte Foto-Ausstellung The Family of Man, die im Januar des gleichen Jahres im Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) New York mit großem Erfolg eröffnet worden war, unter dem Doppeltitel The Family of Man – Wir alle in München gezeigt. 1 Exzerpiert aus einem Vortrag an der Bayerischen Amerika-Akademie München (BAA). Danksagungen: Timo Müller und Sascha Pöhlmann (Konstanz), Dr. Margarethe Schweiger-Wilhelm (BAA), Meike Zwingenberger und Jasmin Falk (Amerikahaus München), Gerd Hurm (Trier), Shamoon Zamir (NYU Abu Dhabi), Anke Reitz (Steichen-Sammlung, Schloß Clervaux, Centre national de l’audivisuel CNA, Luxemburg), Dr. Ursula Keitz, Susanne Böller und Sarah Bock (alle drei Städtische Galerie im Lenbachhaus München), Dr. Richard Hampe (Nachlassverwalter Franz Roh), Dr. Ulrich Pohlmann, Rudolf Scheutle und Marion Glaser (alle drei Münchner Stadtmuseum), Elisabeth Angermair (Stadtarchiv München), Petra Höhenberger (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek), Philip Koch (Wolfgang Koeppen-Archiv Greifswald), Agnes Harder (Germanisches Nationalmuseum Nürnberg), Thomas Huttig (Willi Huttig- Archiv Starnberg), Monica Blank (Rockefeller Archive Center), Judith Cohen (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum) und Nicole Westerdahl (Jackie Martin Papers, Special Collections Research Center, Syracuse University Libraries). Alle USIS-Materialien kommen aus den National Archives Washington, Record Group 306-FM. Eric Sandeen schrieb das klassische Buch zur Family of Man und Gerd Hurm, Anke Reitz und Shamoon Zamir gaben einen Band mit vorher nicht beachteten Materialien und neuen Interpretationen der Ausstellung heraus. -
Tanya Sources.Pdf
The Way to the Tree of Life Jewish practice entails fulfilling many laws. Our diet is limited, our days to work are defined, and every aspect of life has governing directives. Is observance of all the laws easy? Is a perfectly righteous life close to our heart and near to our limbs? A righteous life seems to be an impossible goal! However, in the Torah, our great teacher Moshe, Moses, declared that perfect fulfillment of all religious law is very near and easy for each of us. Every word of the Torah rings true in every generation. Lesson one explores how the Tanya resolved these questions. It will shine a light on the infinite strength that is latent in each Jewish soul. When that unending holy desire emerges, observance becomes easy. Lesson One: The Infinite Strength of the Jewish Soul The title page of the Tanya states: A Collection of Teachings ספר PART ONE לקוטי אמרים חלק ראשון Titled הנקרא בשם The Book of the Beinonim ספר של בינונים Compiled from sacred books and Heavenly מלוקט מפי ספרים ומפי סופרים קדושי עליון נ״ע teachers, whose souls are in paradise; based מיוסד על פסוק כי קרוב אליך הדבר מאד בפיך ובלבבך לעשותו upon the verse, “For this matter is very near to לבאר היטב איך הוא קרוב מאד בדרך ארוכה וקצרה ”;you, it is in your mouth and heart to fulfill it בעזה״י and explaining clearly how, in both a long and short way, it is exceedingly near, with the aid of the Holy One, blessed be He. "1 of "393 The Way to the Tree of Life From the outset of his work therefore Rav Shneur Zalman made plain that the Tanya is a guide for those he called “beinonim.” Beinonim, derived from the Hebrew bein, which means “between,” are individuals who are in the middle, neither paragons of virtue, tzadikim, nor sinners, rishoim. -
2020 SBM Teshuvot “Dina D'malkhuta Dina: Obligations And
2020 SBM Teshuvot “Dina D’Malkhuta Dina: Obligations and Limits” Published by the Center for Modern Torah Leadership 1 Table of Contents Week One Summary: Dina Demalkhuta Dina: How Broad a Principle? 3 Week Two Summary: What Makes Taxation Halakhically Legitimate? 5 Week Three Summary: Does Halakhah Permit Taxation Without Representation? 8 Week Four Summary: Are Israeli Labor Laws Binding on Chareidi Schools? 11 Week Five Summary: Does Dina Demalkhuta Dina Apply in Democracies? 14 Week Six Summary: Introduction to the Sh’eilah 16 SBM 2020 Sh’eilah 17 State Authority and Religious Obligation – An Introduction 19 Teshuvah - Bracha Weinberger 23 Teshuvah - Talia Weisberg 26 Teshuvah - Avi Sommer 30 Teshuvah - Zack Orenshein 37 Teshuvah - Sara Schatz 41 Teshuvah - Batsheva Leah Weinstein 43 Teshuvah - Joshua Skootsky 48 Teshuvah - Eliana Yashgur 52 Teshuvah - Eli Putterman 55 Teshuvah - Akiva Weisinger 65 2 Week One Summary: Dina Demalkhuta Dina: How Broad a Principle? by Avi Sommer July 3, 2020 Mishnah Bava Kamma 113a places various restrictions on transactions with tax collectors on the ground that their coins are considered stolen. For example, one may not accept charity from tax collectors or ask them to change larger denominations. You may be wondering: why would someone having a private economic transaction with a tax collector receive coins collected as taxes in change? Likewise, how could tax collectors give tax money away as charity? Shouldn’t it all have been given to their government? The answer is that the governments with which Chaza”l interacted, such as the Roman Empire, would sell the right to collect taxes to private individuals. -
Mattos Chassidus on the Massei ~ Mattos Chassidus on the Parsha +
LIGHTS OF OUR RIGHTEOUS TZADDIKIM בעזרת ה ' יתבר A Tzaddik, or righteous person , makes everyone else appear righteous before Hashem by advocating for them and finding their merits. Kedushas Levi, Parshas Noach (Bereishis 7:1) MATTOS ~ MASSEI _ CHASSIDUS ON THE PARSHA + Dvar Torah – Mattos Keep Your Word The Torah states (30:3), “If a man takes a vow or swears an oath to G -d to establish a prohibition upon himself, he shall not violate his word; he shall fulfill whatever comes out of his mouth.” In relation to this passuk , the Midrash quotes from Tehillim (144:4), “Our days are like a fleeting shadow.” What is the connection? This can be explained, says Rav Levi Yitzchok, according to a Gemara ( Nedarim 10b), which states, “It is forbidden to say, ‘ Lashem korban , for G-d − an offering.’ Instead a person must say, ‘ Korban Lashem , an offering for G -d.’ Why? Because he may die before he says the word korban , and then he will have said the holy Name in vain.” In this light, we can understand the Midrash. The Torah states that a person makes “a vow to G-d.” This i s the exact language that must be used, mentioning the vow first. Why? Because “our days are like a fleeting shadow,” and there is always the possibility that he may die before he finishes his vow and he will have uttered the Name in vain. n Story The wood chopper had come to Ryczywohl from the nearby village in which he lived, hoping to find some kind of employment. -
2.2 Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy
On-Surface Chemical Reactions on an Insulating Substrate Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften im Promotionsfach Physikalische Chemie am Fachbereich Chemie, Pharmazie und Geowissenschaften der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Markus Jan Kittelmann geboren in Münster Mainz, den 30. Januar 2013 This dissertation was supervised by [Personal data removed] and was carried out at the Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz from April 2010 to January 2013. D77 (Dissertation Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz) dean of the faculty [Personal data removed] 1st report [Personal data removed] Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz 2nd report [Personal data removed] Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz 3rd report [Personal data removed] Universität Osnabrück Submitted: January 2013 Oral examination: 14. March 2013 Für meine Eltern Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Measurement Methods 5 2.1 Atomic Force Microscopy ................ 6 2.2 Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy ............ 18 3 Experimental Setup and Equipment 25 4 Bulk Insulator Substrate: Calcite 33 5 Towards On-Surface Reactions on Bulk Insulators 37 5.1 Reactions on Metals ................... 38 5.2 Moving to Bulk Insulating Surfaces ......... 43 6 Substrate Templating vs Molecular Interactions 49 7 Visualization of Molecule Deprotonation 59 8 Controlled Activation of Substrate Templating 71 9 On-Surface Covalent Linking 79 10 Two-Step On-Surface Polymerization 93 11 Summary 105 Bibliography 109 Acknowledgements 129 List of Abbreviations 131 Publications 133 vi 1 Introduction In the middle of the last century, inorganic semiconductor re- search evolved from an emerging field into a powerful technolo- gy, having a tremendous impact on many areas of our daily life. The production of bipolar and field effect transistors enabled the development of today omnipresent microelectronics. -
L1teracy As the Creation of Personal Meaning in the Lives of a Select Group of Hassidic Women in Quebec
WOMEN OF VALOUR: L1TERACY AS THE CREATION OF PERSONAL MEANING IN THE LIVES OF A SELECT GROUP OF HASSIDIC WOMEN IN QUEBEC by Sharyn Weinstein Sepinwall The Department of Integrated Studies in Education A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research , in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education Faculty of Education McGiII University National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 canada Canada Our fie Notre réIérfInœ The author bas granted a non L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library ofCanada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies ofthis thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fonnat électronique. The author retains ownership ofthe L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts from it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son pemnsslOn. autorisation. 0-612-78770-2 Canada Women of Valour: Literacy as the Creation of Personal Meaning in the Lives of a Select Group of Hassidic Women in Quebec Sharyn Weinstein Sepinwall 11 Acknowledgments One of my colleagues at McGiII in the Faculty of Management was fond of saying "writing a dissertation should change your life." Her own dissertation had been reviewed in the Wall Street Journal and its subsequent acclaim had indeed, 1surmised, changed her life.