View to Eradication
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cryptic Speciation in a Holarctic Passerine Revealed by Genetic and Bioacoustic Analyses
Molecular Ecology (2008) 17, 2691–2705 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03769.x CBlackwell Publrishing Lytd ptic speciation in a Holarctic passerine revealed by genetic and bioacoustic analyses DAVID P. L. TOEWS and DARREN E. IRWIN Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4 Abstract There has been much controversy regarding the timing of speciation events in birds, and regarding the relative roles of natural and sexual selection in promoting speciation. Here, we investigate these issues using winter wrens (Troglodytes troglodytes), an unusual example of a passerine with a Holarctic distribution. Geographical variation has led to speculation that the western North American form Troglodytes troglodytes pacificus might be a distinct biological species compared to those in eastern North America (e.g. Troglodytes troglodytes hiemalis) and Eurasia. We located the first known area in which both forms can be found, often inhabiting neighbouring territories. Each male wren in this area sings either western or eastern song, and the differences in song are as distinct in the contact zone as they are in allopatry. The two singing types differ distinctly in mitochondrial DNA sequences and amplified fragment length polymorpism profiles. These results indicate that the two forms are reproductively isolated to a high degree where they co-occur and are therefore separate species. DNA variation suggests that the initial split between the two species occurred before the Pleistocene, quite long ago for sister species in the boreal forest. Surprisingly, the two forms are similar in morphometric traits and habitat characteristics of territories. These findings suggest that sexual selection played a larger role than habitat divergence in generating reproductive isolation, and raise the possibility that there are other such morphologically cryptic species pairs in North America. -
Archipiélago De Revillagigedo
LATIN AMERICA / CARIBBEAN ARCHIPIÉLAGO DE REVILLAGIGEDO MEXICO Manta birostris in San Benedicto - © IUCN German Soler Mexico - Archipiélago de Revillagigedo WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION – IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION ARCHIPIÉLAGO DE REVILLAGIGEDO (MEXICO) – ID 1510 IUCN RECOMMENDATION TO WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: To inscribe the property under natural criteria. Key paragraphs of Operational Guidelines: Paragraph 77: Nominated property meets World Heritage criteria (vii), (ix) and (x). Paragraph 78: Nominated property meets integrity and protection and management requirements. 1. DOCUMENTATION (2014). Evaluación de la capacidad de carga para buceo en la Reserva de la Biosfera Archipiélago de a) Date nomination received by IUCN: 16 March Revillagigedo. Informe Final para la Direción de la 2015 Reserva de la Biosiera, CONANP. La Paz, B.C.S. 83 pp. Martínez-Gomez, J. E., & Jacobsen, J.K. (2004). b) Additional information officially requested from The conservation status of Townsend's shearwater and provided by the State Party: A progress report Puffinus auricularis auricularis. Biological Conservation was sent to the State Party on 16 December 2015 116(1): 35-47. Spalding, M.D., Fox, H.E., Allen, G.R., following the IUCN World Heritage Panel meeting. The Davidson, N., Ferdaña, Z.A., Finlayson, M., Halpern, letter reported on progress with the evaluation process B.S., Jorge, M.A., Lombana, A., Lourie, S.A., Martin, and sought further information in a number of areas K.D., McManus, E., Molnar, J., Recchia, C.A. & including the State Party’s willingness to extend the Robertson, J. (2007). Marine ecoregions of the world: marine no-take zone up to 12 nautical miles (nm) a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. -
The Vocal Behavior of the Brown-Throated Wren (Troglodytes Brunneicollis): Song Structure, Repertoires, Sharing, Syntax, and Diel Variation
J Ornithol DOI 10.1007/s10336-013-1024-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The vocal behavior of the Brown-throated Wren (Troglodytes brunneicollis): song structure, repertoires, sharing, syntax, and diel variation J. Roberto Sosa-Lo´pez • Daniel J. Mennill Received: 3 December 2012 / Revised: 19 September 2013 / Accepted: 5 November 2013 Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2013 Abstract Empirical descriptions of vocal behaviour are of the song. Transitions between syllable categories deviate important for understanding avian biology. In this study, significantly from random chance, and most males ana- we provide the first detailed analysis of the vocal behaviour lyzed follow similar patterns of syllable transitions, of the Brown-throated Wren (Troglodytes brunneicollis), a revealing syntactical structure. This research, which pro- neotropical songbird found in oak forests in the highlands vides the first empirical study of Brown-throated Wren of Mexico and the southwestern United States. We quantify song, expands our knowledge of the behaviour of this the fine structural characteristics of the song, and describe poorly-studied taxon, and contributes insight into the the size and structure of the song repertoire. Further, we organization and composition of song in tropical birds. describe diel variation, analyze song-sharing patterns among neighbors, and explore whether this species uses Keywords Troglodytes Á Diel variation Á Repertoire Á syntactical rules for creating their songs. Our analyses Syntax Á Vocal behavior Á Autonomous recorder reveal that Brown-throated Wrens have complex songs and simple calls. They sing with eventual variety, repeating Zusammenfassung songs many times before switching to a new song type. Males combine syllables into phrases to create songs. -
Psittascene Vol. 18.1, Feb. 2006
PsittaScene I NTHIS I SSUE Fly Free - EU Extends Import Ban Blue-throated Macaws: the 2005 Breeding Season February 2006 Volum e 18 Number 1 Fly Free continued PPsittasitta EU extends temporary ban, sparing another million wild birds SceneScene By JAMIE GILARDI We were positively thrilled last October when we heard that the European Union had Magazine of the World Parrot Trust halted all bird imports for a month. Not only would this decision alone save many Glanmor House, Hayle, Cornwall, thousands of wild birds from trapping and its horrible consequences, but it raised the TR27 4HB, UK issue at the very highest levels of whether commercial trapping should continue at all. When that first month’s ban was extended to the end of January 2006 - another two months of zero imports - our delight was magnified further. The extension provided CONTENTS an opportunity to expand the discussion to include the conservation and welfare Fly free continued ..........................................2 impacts of the trade as well as the disease risks dominating the news. Trading parrots revisited .............................. 3 As a coalition of organizatinos working on starting when we submitted the Wild Bird Blue-throated Macaw breeding highlights.. 4-8 this campaign, we suddenly found ourselves Declaration to the EU in December 2004 Advancing the knowledge of in the position to provide various review (see http://birdsareforwatching.org). On New Zealand’s Red-crowned Kakariki ..........9 panels in the UK and EU governments with the day of the announcement of the ban in Observations of the substantive science and data on the wild October, that counter had climbed to well Ye llow-crested Cockatoo..........................10-11 bird trade. -
North American Important Bird Areas
North American Important Bird Areas A Directory of 150 Key Conservation Sites Table of Contents This publication was prepared by the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC). The views contained herein do not necessarily reflect the views of the CEC, or the governments of Canada, Mexico or the United States of Table of Contents America. Foreword . v Acknowlegments . ix Reproduction of this document in whole or in part and in any Introduction. 1 form for educational or nonprofit purposes may be made with- Methods. 5 out special permission from the CEC Secretariat, provided Criteria . 9 acknowledgement of the source is made. The CEC would appre- Conservation and Management of Important Bird Areas . 17 How to Read the IBA Site Accounts. 29 ciate receiving a copy of any publication or material that uses this document as a source. Canada . 31 Introduction to the Canadian Sites . 35 Published by the Communications and Public Outreach Depart- United States . 139 ment of the CEC Secretariat. Introduction to the US Sites . 143 For more information about this or other publications from Mexico . 249 the CEC, contact : Introduction to the Mexican Sites. 253 COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 393, rue St-Jacques Ouest, bureau 200 Montréal (Québec) Canada H2Y 1N9 Tel: (514) 350–4300 • Fax: (514) 350–4314 http://www.cec.org ISBN 2-922305-42-2 Disponible en français sous le titre : Les zones importantes pour la con- servation des oiseaux en Amérique du Nord (ISBN 2-922305-44-9). Disponible en español con el título Áreas Importantes para la Conservación de las Aves de América del Norte (ISBN 2-922305-43-0). -
Evaluation*Of*The*! National"Fish"And"Wildlife"Foundation! ! Pacific&Seabird&Program! ! ! ! Final&Report!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Evaluation*of*the*! National"Fish"and"Wildlife"Foundation! ! Pacific&Seabird&Program! ! ! ! Final&Report! ! ! Submitted!to!the!! National!Fish!and!Wildlife!Foundation! ! October!6,!2014! ! by!! ! Dantzker!Consulting! in!collaboration!with! Advanced!Conservation!Strategies! and!Clarus!Research! ! 1! ! TABLE!OF!CONTENTS! Executive!Summary! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!iv! Evaluation!Introduction!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!1! Evaluation!Findings! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!7! Question!1:!To!what!degree!is!the!Program!on!track!for!achieving!its! goals?!To!what!extent!has!it!achieved!onMtheMground!implementation! of!its!core!objectives?! ! !!7! Question!2:!Were!the!initial!scope!and!selection!of!strategies!and!species! appropriate!to!the!conservation!need?! ! ! ! ! ! 24! Question!3:!!What!is!the!added!value!or!contribution!of!NFWF’s!PSP!across!!!!! the!conservation!landscape?!What!is!the!Program’s!greatest!point!of!!!!!!! leverage!and!why?! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41! Recommendations! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 46! References! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 52! Appendices!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Appendix!A:!Evaluation!Questions! Appendix!B:!Evaluation!Methods:!Data!Sources,!Data!Analysis!and! Study!Limitations!! Appendix!C:!PSP!Projects!Included!in!the!Evaluation! Appendix!D:!Interview!Questions! Appendix!E:!Online!Survey!Instrument! Appendix!F:!Survey!Data:!Analysis!and!Results! Appendix!G:!ReturnMonMInvestment!Analysis:!Results! Appendix!H:!Highlights! Appendix!I:!Species!Outcomes!and!Indicator!Metrics! Appendix!J:!Additional!Bird!Species!Expected!to!Benefit!from!NFWF! Investments! ! i! ! LIST!OF!TABLES! -
AOU Check-List Supplement
AOU Check-list Supplement The Auk 117(3):847–858, 2000 FORTY-SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS’ UNION CHECK-LIST OF NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS This first Supplement since publication of the 7th Icterus prosthemelas, Lonchura cantans, and L. atricap- edition (1998) of the AOU Check-list of North American illa); (3) four species are changed (Caracara cheriway, Birds summarizes changes made by the Committee Glaucidium costaricanum, Myrmotherula pacifica, Pica on Classification and Nomenclature between its re- hudsonia) and one added (Caracara lutosa) by splits constitution in late 1998 and 31 January 2000. Be- from now-extralimital forms; (4) four scientific cause the makeup of the Committee has changed sig- names of species are changed because of generic re- nificantly since publication of the 7th edition, it allocation (Ibycter americanus, Stercorarius skua, S. seems appropriate to outline the way in which the maccormicki, Molothrus oryzivorus); (5) one specific current Committee operates. The philosophy of the name is changed for nomenclatural reasons (Baeolo- Committee is to retain the present taxonomic or dis- phus ridgwayi); (6) the spelling of five species names tributional status unless substantial and convincing is changed to make them gramatically correct rela- evidence is published that a change should be made. tive to the generic name (Jacamerops aureus, Poecile The Committee maintains an extensive agenda of atricapilla, P. hudsonica, P. cincta, Buarremon brunnein- potential action items, including possible taxonomic ucha); (7) one English name is changed to conform to changes and changes to the list of species included worldwide use (Long-tailed Duck), one is changed in the main text or the Appendix. -
Redalyc.FERAL SHEEP ERADICATION at SOCORRO
Interciencia ISSN: 0378-1844 [email protected] Asociación Interciencia Venezuela Ortiz-Alcaraz, Antonio; Aguirre-Muñoz, Alfonso; Méndez-Sánchez, Federico; Ortega- Rubio, Alfredo FERAL SHEEP ERADICATION AT SOCORRO ISLAND, MEXICO: A MANDATORY STEP TO ENSURE ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION Interciencia, vol. 41, núm. 3, marzo, 2016, pp. 184-189 Asociación Interciencia Caracas, Venezuela Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=33944256007 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative FERAL SHEEP ERADICATION AT SOCORRO ISLAND, MEXICO: A MANDATORY STEP TO ENSURE ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION Antonio Ortiz-Alcaraz, Alfonso Aguirre-Muñoz, Federico Méndez-Sánchez and Alfredo Ortega-Rubio SUMMARY Domestic sheep have been introduced to numerous islands were captured and equipped with radio-collars (Judas sheep). worldwide; they became feral and caused indiscriminate im- From March 2010 to April 2012 eradication continued using pacts on ecosystems. On Socorro, a tropical Mexican island terrestrial hunting; 505 sheep were dispatched at this stage. in the Pacific Ocean, feral sheep caused soil compaction and The use of Judas sheep and detection dogs were critical in lo- erosion, loss of vegetation, habitat destruction, landscape al- cating the last remaining sheep. A systematic monitoring pro- terations, and species extinction. In response to these biodiver- gram conducted during two years confirmed eradication suc- sity threats, feral sheep were removed from Socorro Island. In cess. In June 2014, Socorro Island was declared free of feral 2009, 1257 sheep were dispatched using aerial hunting over 35 sheep.