DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Protection Agency § 60.4248

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SUBCHAPTER C—AIR PROGRAMS (CONTINUED) PART 60—STANDARDS OF PER- 60.544 Monitoring of operations. 60.545 Recordkeeping requirements. FORMANCE FOR NEW STA- 60.546 Reporting requirements. TIONARY SOURCES (CONTIN- 60.547 Test methods and procedures. UED) 60.548 Delegation of authority. Subpart XX—Standards of Performance for Subpart CCC [Reserved] Bulk Gasoline Terminals Subpart DDD—Standards of Performance Sec. for Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) 60.500 Applicability and designation of af- Emissions from the Polymer Manufac- fected facility. turing Industry 60.501 Definitions. 60.502 Standards for Volatile Organic Com- 60.560 Applicability and designation of af- pound (VOC) emissions from bulk gaso- fected facilities. line terminals. 60.561 Definitions. 60.503 Test methods and procedures. 60.562–1 Standards: Process emissions. 60.504 [Reserved] 60.562–2 Standards: Equipment leaks of 60.505 Reporting and recordkeeping. VOC. 60.506 Reconstruction. 60.563 Monitoring requirements. 60.564 Test methods and procedures. Subpart AAA—Standards of Performance 60.565 Reporting and recordkeeping require- for New Residential Wood Heaters ments. 60.566 Delegation of authority. 60.530 Am I subject to this subpart? 60.531 What definitions must I know? Subpart EEE [Reserved] 60.532 What standards and associated re- quirements must I meet and by when? Subpart FFF—Standards of Performance for 60.533 What compliance and certification re- Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating quirements must I meet and by when? and Printing 60.534 What test methods and procedures must I use to determine compliance with 60.580 Applicability and designation of af- the standards and requirements for cer- fected facility. tification? 60.581 Definitions and symbols. 60.535 What procedures must I use for EPA 60.582 Standard for volatile organic com- approval of a test laboratory or EPA ap- pounds. proval of a third-party certifier? 60.583 Test methods and procedures. 60.536 What requirements must I meet for 60.584 Monitoring of operations and record- permanent labels, temporary labels keeping requirements. (hangtags), and owner’s manuals? 60.585 Reporting requirements. 60.537 What records must I keep and what reports must I submit? Subpart GGG—Standards of Performance 60.538 What activities are prohibited under for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petro- this subpart? leum Refineries for Which Construction, 60.539 What hearing and appeal procedures apply to me? Reconstruction, or Modification Com- 60.539a Who implements and enforces this menced After January 4, 1983, and on subpart? or Before November 7, 2006 60.539b What parts of the General Provi- 60.590 Applicability and designation of af- sions do not apply to me? fected facility. Subpart BBB—Standards of Performance for 60.591 Definitions. 60.592 Standards. the Rubber Tire Manufacturing Industry 60.593 Exceptions. 60.540 Applicability and designation of af- fected facilities. Subpart GGGa—Standards of Performance 60.541 Definitions. for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petro- 60.542 Standards for volatile organic com- leum Refineries for Which Construction, pounds. Reconstruction, or Modification Com- 60.542a Alternate standard for volatile or- menced After November 7, 2006 ganic compounds. 60.543 Performance test and compliance pro- 60.590a Applicability and designation of af- visions. fected facility. 5 VerDate Sep<11>2014 10:33 Sep 02, 2020 Jkt 250158 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\40\40V8.TXT PC31 kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB Pt. 60 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–20 Edition) 60.591a Definitions. 60.636 Reporting requirements. 60.592a Standards. 60.593a Exceptions. Subpart LLL—Standards of Performance for SO2 Emissions From Onshore Natural Subpart HHH—Standards of Performance Gas Processing for Which Construc- for Synthetic Fiber Production Facilities tion, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After January 20, 1984, 60.600 Applicability and designation of af- fected facility. and on or Before August 23, 2011 60.601 Definitions. 60.640 Applicability and designation of af- 60.602 Standard for volatile organic com- fected facilities. pounds. 60.641 Definitions. 60.603 Performance test and compliance pro- 60.642 Standards for sulfur dioxide. visions. 60.643 Compliance provisions. 60.604 Reporting requirements. 60.644 Test methods and procedures. Subpart III—Standards of Performance for 60.645 [Reserved] Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) 60.646 Monitoring of emissions and oper- ations. Emissions From the Synthetic Organic 60.647 Recordkeeping and reporting require- Chemical Manufacturing Industry ments. (SOCMI) Air Oxidation Unit Processes 60.648 Optional procedure for measuring hy- drogen sulfide in acid gas—Tutwiler Pro- 60.610 Applicability and designation of af- cedure. fected facility. 60.611 Definitions. Subpart MMM [Reserved] 60.612 Standards. 60.613 Monitoring of emissions and oper- Subpart NNN—Standards of Performance ations. 60.614 Test methods and procedures. for Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) 60.615 Reporting and recordkeeping require- Emissions From Synthetic Organic ments. Chemical Manufacturing Industry 60.616 Reconstruction. (SOCMI) Distillation Operations 60.617 Chemicals affected by subpart III. 60.660 Applicability and designation of af- 60.618 Delegation of authority. fected facility. Subpart JJJ—Standards of Performance for 60.661 Definitions. Petroleum Dry Cleaners 60.662 Standards. 60.663 Monitoring of emissions and oper- 60.620 Applicability and designation of af- ations. fected facility. 60.664 Test methods and procedures. 60.621 Definitions. 60.665 Reporting and recordkeeping require- 60.622 Standards for volatile organic com- ments. pounds. 60.666 Reconstruction. 60.623 Equivalent equipment and proce- 60.667 Chemicals affected by subpart NNN. dures. 60.668 Delegation of authority. 60.624 Test methods and procedures. 60.625 Recordkeeping requirements. Subpart OOO—Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants Subpart KKK—Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC From On- 60.670 Applicability and designation of af- shore Natural Gas Processing Plants for fected facility. Which Construction, Reconstruction, or 60.671 Definitions. Modification Commenced After Janu- 60.672 Standard for particulate matter (PM). ary 20, 1984, and on or Before August 60.673 Reconstruction. 23, 2011 60.674 Monitoring of operations. 60.630 Applicability and designation of af- 60.675 Test methods and procedures. fected facility. 60.676 Reporting and recordkeeping. 60.631 Definitions. TABLE 1 TO SUBPART OOO OF PART 60—EXCEP- 60.632 Standards. TIONS TO APPLICABILITY OF SUBPART A TO 60.633 Exceptions. SUBPART OOO 60.634 Alternative means of emission limi- TABLE 2 TO SUBPART OOO OF PART 60—STACK tation. EMISSION LIMITS FOR AFFECTED FACILI- 60.635 Recordkeeping requirements. TIES WITH CAPTURE SYSTEMS 6 VerDate Sep<11>2014 10:33 Sep 02, 2020 Jkt 250158 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\40\40V8.TXT PC31 kpayne on VMOFRWIN702 with $$_JOB Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 60 TABLE 3 TO SUBPART OOO OF PART 60—FUGI- Subpart SSS—Standards of Performance for TIVE EMISSION LIMITS Magnetic Tape Coating Facilities Subpart PPP—Standard of Performance for 60.710 Applicability and designation of af- Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufac- fected facility. turing Plants 60.711 Definitions, symbols, and cross-ref- erence tables. 60.680 Applicability and designation of af- 60.712 Standards for volatile organic com- fected facility. pounds. 60.681 Definitions. 60.713 Compliance provisions. 60.682 Standard for particulate matter. 60.714 Installation of monitoring devices 60.683 Monitoring of operations. and recordkeeping. 60.715 Test methods and procedures. 60.684 Recordkeeping and reporting require- 60.716 Permission to use alternative means ments. of emission limitation. 60.685 Test methods and procedures. 60.717 Reporting and monitoring require- ments. Subpart QQQ—Standards of Performance 60.718 Delegation of authority. for VOC Emissions From Petroleum Re- finery Wastewater Systems Subpart TTT—Standards of Performance for Industrial Surface Coating: Surface 60.690 Applicability and designation of af- fected facility. Coating of Plastic Parts for Business 60.691 Definitions. Machines 60.692–1 Standards: General. 60.720 Applicability and designation of af- 60.692–2 Standards: Individual drain sys- fected facility. tems. 60.721 Definitions. 60.692–3 Standards: Oil-water separators. 60.722 Standards for volatile organic com- 60.692–4 Standards: Aggregate facility. pounds. 60.692–5 Standards: Closed vent systems and 60.723 Performance test and compliance pro- control devices. visions. 60.692–6 Standards: Delay of repair. 60.724 Reporting and recordkeeping require- 60.692–7 Standards: Delay of compliance. ments. 60.693–1 Alternative standards for individual 60.725 Test methods and procedures. drain systems. 60.726 Delegation of authority. 60.693–2 Alternative standards for oil-water separators. Subpart UUU—Standards of Performance 60.694 Permission to use alternative means for Calciners and Dryers in Mineral In- of emission limitation. dustries 60.695 Monitoring of operations. 60.730 Applicability and designation of af- 60.696 Performance test methods and proce- fected facility. dures and compliance provisions. 60.731 Definitions. 60.697 Recordkeeping requirements. 60.732 Standards for particulate matter. 60.698 Reporting requirements. 60.733 Reconstruction. 60.699 Delegation of authority. 60.734 Monitoring of emissions and oper- ations. Subpart RRR—Standards of Performance for 60.735 Recordkeeping and reporting
Recommended publications
  • An Aged Reaction Revisited

    An Aged Reaction Revisited

    TETRAHEDRON Pergamon Tetrahedron 56 (2000) 9705±9711 2-Alkyl-4,6-dialkylamino-1,3,5-triazines via Grignard Alkylation of Cyanuric Chloride: An Aged Reaction Revisited Rita Menicagli,* Simona Samaritani and Valeria Zucchelli Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale and Centro di Studi del CNR per le Macromolecole Stereordinate ed Otticamente Attive, Via Risorgimento 35, 56126 Pisa, Italy Received 24 July 2000; revised 8 September 2000; accepted 28 September 2000 AbstractÐSuitable one-pot reaction conditions are suggested to prepare, in good overall yields, some 2-(alk-1 0-ynyl)- and 2-alkyl-4,6- dialkylamino-1,3,5-triazines via reaction of cyanuric chloride with Grignard reagents followed by amination. q 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. In our studies1 concerning the protection of paper against The reaction between a benzene (CAUTION) solution of 1 pathogenic fungi, we found that 2-(alk-1 0-ynyl)-4,6- and a THF solution of alk-1 0-ynylmagnesium halides has dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazines showed an appreciable biostatic been reported to afford 2-(alk-1 0-ynyl)-4,6-dichloro-1,3,5- activity.2 Taking into account that alkylamino derivatives of triazines in 50±60% yield.6a Since the puri®cation of these 1,3,5-triazine are generally better biostatic agents than intermediates might have caused an appreciable loss of the alkoxy derivatives,1 preparation of 2-(alk-1 0-ynyl)-4,6- product owing to the well known8 reactivity of the C±Cl dialkylamino-1,3,5-triazines was necessary in order to bonds and the treatment of the crude products with nucleo- compare their antifungal activities with those of 2-(alk-1 0- philes would have lead to complex mixtures of compounds, ynyl)-4,6-dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazines.
  • One-Pot Synthesis of Tetrasubstituted Imidazoles Catalyzed by Preyssler-Type Heteropoly Acid

    One-Pot Synthesis of Tetrasubstituted Imidazoles Catalyzed by Preyssler-Type Heteropoly Acid

    ISSN: 0973-4945; CODEN ECJHAO E-Journal of Chemistry http://www.e-journals.net 2011, 8(2), 547-552 One-Pot Synthesis of Tetrasubstituted Imidazoles Catalyzed by Preyssler-Type Heteropoly Acid ALI JAVID §*, MAJID M. HERAVI #, F. F. BAMOHARRAM and MOHSEN NIKPOUR § §Department of Chemistry, School of Sciences Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz 6134968875, Iran #Department of Chemistry Azzahra University, Vanak, Tehran, Iran Department of Chemistry, School of Sciences Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran [email protected] Received 27 June 2010; Accepted 2 September 2010 Abstract: A simple one-pot four-component synthetic method was reported for the preparation of tetrasubstituted imidazole derivatives from benzil, aromatic aldehydes, primary amines and ammonium acetate in the presence of Preyssler-type heteropoly acid catalyst . This method was proved to be eco- benign, easy work-up, convenient, relatively short reaction times and the products were isolated with high yields. Keywords: Multi-component reactions (MCRs), One-pot synthesis, tetrasubstituted imidazoles, Preyssler catalyst, Heteropoly acid (HPA) Introduction Imidazole, at first, has been prepared by debus 1 in 1858. Over the century, imidazole derivatives have received significant attention due to their synthesis, reactions and biochemical properties. The imidazoles are one of the most important substructures found in a large number of natural products and pharmacologically active compounds. For example, histidine, histamine and biotin, an active component in several drug molecules 2, anti-allergic activity 3, hypnotic agent etomidate 4, proton pump inhibitor omeprazole 5 and the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil 6 are imidazole derivatives. Recent advances in green chemistry and organometallic catalysis has extended the application of imidazoles as ionic liquids 7 and N-heterocyclic carbenes 8.
  • Retention Indices for Frequently Reported Compounds of Plant Essential Oils

    Retention Indices for Frequently Reported Compounds of Plant Essential Oils

    Retention Indices for Frequently Reported Compounds of Plant Essential Oils V. I. Babushok,a) P. J. Linstrom, and I. G. Zenkevichb) National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA (Received 1 August 2011; accepted 27 September 2011; published online 29 November 2011) Gas chromatographic retention indices were evaluated for 505 frequently reported plant essential oil components using a large retention index database. Retention data are presented for three types of commonly used stationary phases: dimethyl silicone (nonpolar), dimethyl sili- cone with 5% phenyl groups (slightly polar), and polyethylene glycol (polar) stationary phases. The evaluations are based on the treatment of multiple measurements with the number of data records ranging from about 5 to 800 per compound. Data analysis was limited to temperature programmed conditions. The data reported include the average and median values of retention index with standard deviations and confidence intervals. VC 2011 by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce on behalf of the United States. All rights reserved. [doi:10.1063/1.3653552] Key words: essential oils; gas chromatography; Kova´ts indices; linear indices; retention indices; identification; flavor; olfaction. CONTENTS 1. Introduction The practical applications of plant essential oils are very 1. Introduction................................ 1 diverse. They are used for the production of food, drugs, per- fumes, aromatherapy, and many other applications.1–4 The 2. Retention Indices ........................... 2 need for identification of essential oil components ranges 3. Retention Data Presentation and Discussion . 2 from product quality control to basic research. The identifi- 4. Summary.................................. 45 cation of unknown compounds remains a complex problem, in spite of great progress made in analytical techniques over 5.
  • 02/06/2019 12:05 PM Appendix 3745-21-09 Appendix A

    02/06/2019 12:05 PM Appendix 3745-21-09 Appendix A

    ACTION: Final EXISTING DATE: 02/06/2019 12:05 PM Appendix 3745-21-09 Appendix A List of Organic Chemicals for which Paragraphs (DD) and (EE) of Rule 3745-21-09 of the Administrative Code are Applicable Organic Chemical Organic Chemical Acetal Benzaldehyde Acetaldehyde Benzamide Acetaldol Benzene Acetamide Benzenedisulfonic acid Acetanilide Benzenesulfonic acid Acetic acid Benzil Acetic Anhydride Benzilic acid Acetone Benzoic acid Acetone cyanohydrin Benzoin Acetonitrile Benzonitrile Acetophenone Benzophenone Acetyl chloride Benzotrichloride Acetylene Benzoyl chloride Acrolein Benzyl alcohol Acrylamide Benzylamine Acrylic acid Benzyl benzoate Acrylonitrile Benzyl chloride Adipic acid Benzyl dichloride Adiponitrile Biphenyl Alkyl naphthalenes Bisphenol A Allyl alcohol Bromobenzene Allyl chloride Bromonaphthalene Aminobenzoic acid Butadiene Aminoethylethanolamine 1-butene p-aminophenol n-butyl acetate Amyl acetates n-butyl acrylate Amyl alcohols n-butyl alcohol Amyl amine s-butyl alcohol Amyl chloride t-butyl alcohol Amyl mercaptans n-butylamine Amyl phenol s-butylamine Aniline t-butylamine Aniline hydrochloride p-tertbutyl benzoic acid Anisidine 1,3-butylene glycol Anisole n-butyraldehyde Anthranilic acid Butyric acid Anthraquinone Butyric anhydride Butyronitrile Caprolactam APPENDIX p(183930) pa(324943) d: (715700) ra(553210) print date: 02/06/2019 12:05 PM 3745-21-09, Appendix A 2 Carbon disulfide Cyclohexene Carbon tetrabromide Cyclohexylamine Carbon tetrachloride Cyclooctadiene Cellulose acetate Decanol Chloroacetic acid Diacetone alcohol
  • Agrimer™ Polyvinylpyyrolidone (PVP)

    Agrimer™ Polyvinylpyyrolidone (PVP)

    agrimer ™ polyvinylpyyrolidone (PVP) binder, dispersant rheology, modifier, film former, complexing agent Agrimer™ polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) this brochure is divided into two main segments suggested applications General properties and uses 2-10 ¢ complexing agent Agricultural case studies 10 ¢ stabilizers / co-dispersants These case studies highlight the uses of Agrimer™ ¢ binders in dry / wet granulation and extrusion (dry compaction / fluidized-bed spray drying process) polymers in seed coatings, granule and tablet binders and as dispersants. ¢ film-forming agents / binders in seed coatings, dips and pour-ons general properties and uses ¢ biological stabilization ¢ water binding / anti-transpiration properties Agrimer™ PVP products are linear, non-ionic polymers that are soluble in water and many organic solvents. ¢ solubility enhancers via co-precipitation or They are pH stable, and have adhesive, cohesive thermal extrusion and binding properties. The unique ability to adsorb ¢ dye-binding agent on a host of active ingredients makes Agrimer™ PVP regulatory status homopolymers preferred co-dispersants in many The Agrimer™ PVP products listed in this brochure are formulations. Agrimer™ homopolymers have a high exempt from the requirement of a tolerance under glass transition temperature. 40 CFR 180.960. Lower molecular weight (Mw) Agrimer™ polymers (Agrimer™ 15 and Agrimer™ 30) are suitable for physical and chemical properties applications where dusting is a concern, such as The Agrimer™ polymers, a family of homopolymers of seed coatings and agglomeration. Higher Mw polyvinylpyrrolidone, are available in different viscosity Agrimer™ polymers (Agrimer™ 90 and Agrimer™ 120) can grades, ranging from very low to very high molecular build formulation viscosity faster and provide excellent weight. This range, coupled with their solubility in binding and film forming properties.
  • Euthanasia of Experimental Animals

    Euthanasia of Experimental Animals

    EUTHANASIA OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS • *• • • • • • • *•* EUROPEAN 1COMMISSIO N This document has been prepared for use within the Commission. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int) Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1997 ISBN 92-827-9694-9 © European Communities, 1997 Reproduction is authorized, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Belgium European Commission EUTHANASIA OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS Document EUTHANASIA OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS Report prepared for the European Commission by Mrs Bryony Close Dr Keith Banister Dr Vera Baumans Dr Eva-Maria Bernoth Dr Niall Bromage Dr John Bunyan Professor Dr Wolff Erhardt Professor Paul Flecknell Dr Neville Gregory Professor Dr Hansjoachim Hackbarth Professor David Morton Mr Clifford Warwick EUTHANASIA OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS CONTENTS Page Preface 1 Acknowledgements 2 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Objectives of euthanasia 3 1.2 Definition of terms 3 1.3 Signs of pain and distress 4 1.4 Recognition and confirmation of death 5 1.5 Personnel and training 5 1.6 Handling and restraint 6 1.7 Equipment 6 1.8 Carcass and waste disposal 6 2. General comments on methods of euthanasia 7 2.1 Acceptable methods of euthanasia 7 2.2 Methods acceptable for unconscious animals 15 2.3 Methods that are not acceptable for euthanasia 16 3. Methods of euthanasia for each species group 21 3.1 Fish 21 3.2 Amphibians 27 3.3 Reptiles 31 3.4 Birds 35 3.5 Rodents 41 3.6 Rabbits 47 3.7 Carnivores - dogs, cats, ferrets 53 3.8 Large mammals - pigs, sheep, goats, cattle, horses 57 3.9 Non-human primates 61 3.10 Other animals not commonly used for experiments 62 4.
  • RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, 2-Isopropyl-4- Methylanisole, CAS Registry Number 31574-44-4

    RIFM Fragrance Ingredient Safety Assessment, 2-Isopropyl-4- Methylanisole, CAS Registry Number 31574-44-4

    Food and Chemical Toxicology 110 (2017) S545eS551 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Food and Chemical Toxicology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchemtox Short review RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-isopropyl-4- methylanisole, CAS Registry Number 31574-44-4 * A.M. Api a, , D. Belsito b, D. Botelho a, D. Browne a, M. Bruze c, G.A. Burton Jr. d, J. Buschmann e, M.L. Dagli f, M. Date a, W. Dekant g, C. Deodhar a, M. Francis a, A.D. Fryer h, K. Joshi a,S.LaCavaa, A. Lapczynski a, D.C. Liebler i,D.O’Brien a, R. Parakhia a,A.Patela, T.M. Penning j, G. Ritacco a, J. Romine a, D. Salvito a, T.W. Schultz k, I.G. Sipes l, Y. Thakkar a, E.H. Theophilus a, A.K. Tiethof a, Y. Tokura m, S. Tsang a, J. Wahler a a Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., 50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677, USA b Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, 161 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY 10032, USA c Malmo University Hospital, Department of Occupational & Environmental Dermatology, Sodra Forstadsgatan 101, Entrance 47, Malmo SE-20502, Sweden d School of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan, Dana Building G110, 440 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 58109, USA e Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Nikolai-Fuchs-Strasse 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany f University of Sao Paulo, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Pathology, Av. Prof. dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Sao Paulo CEP 05508-900, Brazil g University of Wuerzburg, Department of Toxicology, Versbacher Str.
  • Cooling Systems

    Cooling Systems

    SEBD0518-09 c 2008 Caterpillar Printed in U.S.A. Contents Understanding Cooling Systems . .4 Cleaning of Heavy-Duty Coolant/Antifreeze Function . 4 Systems . 26 Function of Components. 4 Commercial Heavy-Duty Coolant/Antifreeze Cooling System Temperature . 6 and Supplemental Coolant Additive . 26 Factors That Affect the Cooling System . .8 Water and Supplemental Coolant Additive . .27 Sources of Heat. 8 Cooling Systems with Larger Capacities . 28 Oil Coolers . 8 Adding the Cat SCA to Water at the Aftercoolers. 9 Initial Fill. 28 Transmission, Marine Transmission, or Torque Adding the Cat SCA to Water for Converter Oil Coolers. 9 Maintenance . 28 Retarder Coolers . 10 S•O•S Services Coolant Analysis . .29 Water Cooled Exhaust Manifolds and Water New, Refilled, or Converted Systems. 29 Cooled Turbocharger Shields . 10 Recommended Interval for S•O•S Coolant Hydraulic Oil Coolers. 10 Sampling . 29 Safety Recommendations . .11 S•O•S Coolant Analysis (Level 1) . 29 S•O•S Coolant Analysis (Level 2) . 29 Cooling System Maintenance . .12 Coolant . 12 Caterpillar® Conditioner Elements . .30 Heat Transfer. 12 Functional Effects . .32 Protection Against Freezing of the Coolant . 12 Corrosion Resistance. 12 Pitting and Cavitation-erosion . 33 Scale and Deposits . 12 Rust . 35 Compatibility . 12 Acidity-Alkalinity Imbalance . 36 Non-Foaming . 12 Galvanic and Electrolytic Corrosion. 36 Sediment . 12 Scale and Deposit Formation . 37 Cylinder Wall Pitting . 13 Aeration. 37 Coolant Properties . .14 Coolant-Related Failures . .38 Water . 14 Cracked or Warped Cylinder Heads . 38 Additives . 15 Cylinder Block . 39 Glycol . 15 Piston Seizure . 39 Testing Glycol Concentrations . 16 Cold Operating Temperatures . 40 Coolant Recommendations . .17 Service and Periodic Maintenance .
  • PAPERS READ BEFORE the CHEMICAL SOCIETY. XXII1.-On

    PAPERS READ BEFORE the CHEMICAL SOCIETY. XXII1.-On

    View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue 773 PAPERS READ BEFORE THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY. XXII1.-On Tetrabromide of Carbon. No. II. By THOMASBOLAS and CHARLESE. GROVES. IN a former paper* we described several methods for the preparation of the hitherto unknown tetrabromide of carbon, and in the present communication we desire to lay before the Society the results of our more recent experiments. In addition to those methods of obtaining the carbon tetrabromide, which we have already published, the fol- lowing are of interest, either from a theoretical point of view, or as affording advantageous means for the preparation of that substance. Action of Bromine on Carbon Disulphide. Our former statement that? bromine had no action on carbon disul- phide requires some modification, as we find that when it is heated to 180" or 200" for several hundred hours with bromine free from both chlorine and iodine, and the contents of the tubes are neutralised and distilled in the usual way, a liquid is obtained, which consists almost entirely of unaltered carbon disulphide ; but when this is allowed to evaporate spontaneously, a small quantity of a crystalline substance is left, which has the appearance and properties of carbon tetrabromide. The length of time required for this reaction, and the very small relative amount of substance obtained, would, however, render this Published on 01 January 1871. Downloaded by Brown University 25/10/2014 10:39:25. quite inapplicable as a process for the preparation of the tetra- bromide. Action of Bromine on Carbon Disdphide in, presence of Certain Bromides.
  • Isobutanol in Marine Gasoline

    Isobutanol in Marine Gasoline

    Isobutanol in Marine Gasoline Glenn Johnston July 11, 2017 Bioeconomy 2017 Washington D.C. 1B: Drivers for Emergence of Biofuels for Maritime Industry © 2012 Gevo, Inc. | 1 Gevo’s Current Business System Gevo Production Facilities Core Near Term Markets Isobutanol Production – Side-by-Side with Ethanol Drop-in Markets - Isobutanol Luverne, MN Isobutanol Specialty Chemicals & Solvents Specialty Gasoline Blendstock (Marine/Off-Road) 15 MGPY EtOH 1.5 MGPY IBA* Isobutanol Hydrocarbon Biorefinery Drop-in Markets - Hydrocarbons South Hydrocarbons Hampton Jet Fuel Resources Silsbee, TX Isooctane (gasoline) © 2016 Gevo, Inc. | 2 Isobutanol Properties Gasoline blending value Gasoline Ethanol Isobutanol RON 95 109 105 MON 85 90 91 Anti-knock Index 90 100 98 RVP (psi) 7-15 19 5.2 Density 20C [kg/m3] 720-775 794 801 Boiling Point (C) 32.2 21.1 26.6 % Heating Value of Gasoline 100 66 84 Oxygen (%w/w) <2.7% 34.7 21.6 isobutanol has low RVP, enabling refiners to blend incremental volumes of butanes and pentanes Marine Research Overview Marine Engine Tested – BRP Envinrude and SeaDoo, Mercury, Volvo-Penta, Yamaha, Tohatsu, Indmar, OMC-Johnson, Honda. Marine Biobutanol over 5 years of research -Alternative Fuel Butanol: Preliminary Investigation on Performance and Emissions of a Marine Two-Stroke Direct Fuel Injection Engine -Impact of Blending Gasoline with lsobutanol Compared to Ethanol on Efficiency, Performance and Emissions of a Recreational Marine 4-Stroke Engine -Gaseous and Particulate Emissions Using Isobutanol-Extended Fuel in Recreational Marine
  • TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE for CYANIDE Date Published

    TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE for CYANIDE Date Published

    0 010024 ATSDR/TP-88/12 TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR CYANIDE Date Published - December 1989 ' Prepared by: Syracuse Research Corporation under Contract No. 68-CS-0004 for Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (A TSDR) U.S. Public Health Service in collaboration with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Technical editing/document preparation by: Oak Ridge National Laboratory under DOE Interagency Agreement No. 1857-B026-Al DISCLAIMER Mention of company name or product does not constitute endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. FOREWORD The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-499) extended and amended the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCI.A or Superfund). This public law (also known as SARA) directed the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) to prepare toxicological profiles for hazardous substances which are most commonly found at facilities on the CERCI.A National Priorities List and which pose the most significant potential threat to human health, as determined by ATSDR and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The list of the 100 most significant hazardous substances was published in the Federal Register on Ap r il 17, 1987. Section 110 (3) of SARA directs the Administrator of ATSDR to prepare a toxicological profile for each substance on the list. Each profile must include the following content: "(A) An examination, summary, and interpretation of available toxicological information and epidemiologic evaluations on a hazardous substance in order to ascertain the levels of significant human exposure for the substance and the associated acute, subacute , and chronic health effects.
  • Stationary Reciprocating Engine Diesel Retrofit Case Studies

    Stationary Reciprocating Engine Diesel Retrofit Case Studies

    CASE STUDIES OF STATIONARY RECIPROCATING DIESEL ENGINE RETROFIT PROJECTS November 2009 Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association 1730 M Street, NW * Suite 206 * Washington, DC 20036 www.meca.org www.dieselretrofit.org Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 Stationary Diesel Engine Case Studies...................................................................... 3 2.1 Demonstration of Emission Control Technologies on Diesel-Fueled Backup Generators .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 The Simultaneous Reduction of NOx, PM, HC and Co from Large Stationary Diesel Engines Using SCR and Particulate Filters ...................................................... 5 2.3 Diesel Retrofit of Emergency Backup Power Engine in Puerto Rico................... 7 2.4 Controlling NOx from Gas Drilling Rig Engines ................................................. 7 2.5 Kings County, CA, Department of Public Works................................................... 7 2.6 National Steel and Shipbulding Company (NASSCO)........................................... 8 2.7 Pacific Bell-SBC Telecommunications Facility..................................................... 9 2.8 Santa Clara County Building Operations.............................................................. 9 2.9 Sierra Nevada Brewing Company, Chico, CA....................................................