DOCSLIB.ORG

COUNCIL COMMITTEE of the WHOLE Council Chambers Monday, February 05, 2018 6:00 PM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COUNCIL COMMITTEE of the WHOLE Council Chambers Monday, February 05, 2018 6:00 PM COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Council Chambers Monday, February 05, 2018 6:00 PM AGENDA DAN RUNIONRUNION,, COUNCIL PRESIDENT AGENDA ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Discussion of options for the Village Square concept as part of the update to the Harmon and Santa Fe Parks Master Plan Keith Bredehoeft Committee on Committees update and proposed recommendations Jamie Robichaud *COU2018-06 Consider approval of the final design engineering contract with Water Resources Solutions, LLC for the Delmar and Fontana low water crossing removal and drainage project Keith Bredehoeft *COU2018-07 Consider approval of an agreement with Dale Brothers for the North Park building demolition project Keith Bredehoeft *COU2018-08 Consider approval of a design agreement with BBN Architects, Inc. for the design of the 2018 parks projects Keith Bredehoeft *COU2018-09 Consider approval of Meadowbrook Project Construction Change Order #1 with Superior Bowen Asphalt Company for the modifications to the pond spillway outlets Keith Bredehoeft *COU2018-10 Consider approval of an amendment to the Johnson County SMAC Funding Agreement for the Meadowbrook project Keith Bredehoeft *Council Action Requested the same night PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Council Committee Meeting Date: February 5, 2018 DISCUSS OPTIONS FOR THE VILLVILLAGEAGE SQUARE CONCEPT AASS PART OF THE UPDATE TO HARMON AND SANTA FE PARKS MASTEMASTERR PLAN COUNCIL ACTION – Staff does not necessarily need a decision point made after one meeting, but does seek Council direction after exploring the following options as presented: OPTIONS Option 11---- DirecDirectt staff to modify the 2009 Master Plan to the full “““Village“Village SquareSquare”””” concept that was presented to City Council on October 22,, 20172017 and presented to the public on November 14 ththth and 16 ththth ... Option 22---- Direct staff to modify the 2009 Master Plan to a modified version that eliminates the permanent amphitheatre structure but includes the expanded seating area. Option 33---- Follow the 2009 Master Plan but include an improved performance padpad as part of the skate park reconstructionreconstruction.... BACKGROUND In 2009, the City Council adopted the Parks & Recreation Master Plan, which guides the future development and enhancement of the Prairie Village City parks. For Harmon and Sante Fe Parks , the Plan identified a number of improvements including: expanding play areas including nature play, new shelters, restrooms, trails and much more. One specific improvement was to develop the amphitheatre area, creating a more permanent facility. No significant improvements outlined in the 2009 Plan have been implemented. Included in the 2017 budget was $50,000 to further study the concept of including a permanent amphitheatre structure and seating area creating “Village Square”. The Village Square Committee was formed to oversee this study and is comprised of Council Members Morehead, Gallagher, McFadden, Myers, two Prairie Village residents (Randy Knight and Jon Birkel), and three City Staff members (Wes Jordan, Keith Bredehoeft, and Alley Porter). BBN Architects was selected to study how Harmon and Santa Fe parks could be modified to accommodate a permanent amphitheatre structure with expanded seating area as well as other park amenities. To date feedback on these concepts has been received from the Village Square Committee, the Parks and Recreation Committee, the Tree Board, as well as the general public. Page 1 of 3 C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\12057.doc Two public meetings were held and were well attended. A summary of the comments that were received are attached. Of the comments received residents appear to be generally supportive of improvements in the park. Comments on the concept of a permanent amphitheatre structure were about 50% the idea for and 50% against. It is understood that this data is not necessarily representative of all Prairie Village residents but is data to help with the decision making process. DETAILS OF OPTIONS After the public meetings, the Village Square Committee met and discussed comments received by the public and how should the potential park improvements move forward. The Committee decided that the following options should be presented to the City Council in order to help define processes moving forward: Option 11---- Direct staff to modmodifyify the 2009 Master Plan to the fulfulllll “Village Square” concept that was presented to City Council on October 2, 2017 and presented to the public on November 14 ththth and 16 ththth ... The most significant item to consider related to this option is to determine if the City of Prairie Village wants/needs a permanent amphitheatre structure and expanded seating area. Most of the other ideas presented in this plan are similar in concept to the 2009 Master Plan. The park shelter and play areas can be detailed when the final design project is considered for construction in the future. This Option can be constructed in phases with the following approximate costs. Phase 1- $2,250,000, Phase 2- $2,250,000, and Phase 3- $700,000. Attached are the Ballard King Market Assessment and The Sextant Group Sound and Lighting Study. Cost ImpactImpact---- Cost of Option 1- $5,200,000 2009 Plan in today’s dollars- $3,000,000 (Excludes pool related items) Cost more than the 2009 Plan- $2,200,000 Option 22---- Direct staff to modify the 20020099 Master Plan to a modifiedmodified version that eeeliminateseliminates the permanent amphitheatre structure but includes the expanded seating area. The main question related to this option is if the City of Prairie Village wants/needs an expanded seating area. A performance pad would be built and it would function similar as it does today by utilizing a temporary stage for performances. This option also requires a significant amount of this work to be completed up front as it re-grades a significant area near the existing shelter. This would have to be completed prior to the all-inclusive play area planned in the 2019 CIP. This initial project would cost at a minimum of $2,250,000. Cost ImpactImpact---- Cost of Option 2- $3,500,000 2009 Plan in today’s dollars- $3,000,000 (Excludes pool related items) Page 2 of 3 C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\12057.doc Cost more than the 2009 Plan- $500,000 Option 33---- FolFollowlow the 2009 Master Plan but include an improved peperformancerformance pad as part of the skate park reconstructionreconstruction.... The existing skate park was designed and constructed to accommodate a temporary stage for use during outdoor performances. The skate park is planned for reconstruction given its deteriorating condition and this project provides the opportunity to expand the skate park to construct a more significant performance pad. It would still function as a multi-use area but would be improved from what it is currently today. Cost ImpactImpact---- Cost of Option 3- Same as 2009 Plan 2009 Plan in today’s dollars- $3,000,000 (Excluded pool related items) Skate Park- Possibly add up to $50,000 for performance pad Factors to consideconsiderrrr---- -The 2009 Plan is a very detailed plan and includes the idea and concept to build a more formal amphitheatre facility. -The 2009 Plan is estimated to cost $3,000,000 in today’s dollars. None of the plan changes/amenities have been budgeted for final design and construction with the exception of the All-Inclusive Play area planned for 2019. -Options 1 and Option 2 would significantly change the 2009 Master Plan as the expanded seating area for the amphitheatre changes the site grading significantly. RRRELATEDRELATED TO VILLAGE VISION 2. I. Enhancing Parks and Open Space CFS2.a. Preserve and protect natural areas. CFS2.b. Enhance parks for active and passive recreation through capital improvements such as landscaping, tree and flower planting, shelters picnic facilities, athletic fields, etc. ATTACHMENTS 2009 Master Plan Details 2009 Master Plan Drawing Village Square- Option 1 and 2 Village Square- Option 3 Ballard King- Market Assessment The Sextant Group- Sound and Lighting Study Public Comments PREPARED BYBYBY Keith Bredehoeft, Public Works Director January 31, 2018 Page 3 of 3 C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\12057.doc MASTER PLAN FOR THE VILLAGE SQUARE AT HARMON & SANTA FE PARKS – OPTION 1 MASTER PLAN FOR THE VILLAGE SQUARE AT HARMON & SANTA FE PARKS – OPTION 2 Table of Contents Section I – Executive Summary Page 2 Section II – Key Demographic Indicators Page 4 Section III – Arts Summary & Participation Page 15 Section IV – Other Service Providers & Facility Considerations Page 23 Section V – Outdoor Performance Area Operational Plan Page 27 Appendix A – Primary Service Area Demographic Analysis Page 36 Appendix B – Sports Participation Numbers Page 43 1 | P a g e Section I – Executive Summary Ballard*King & Associates (B*K) as a subcontract of BBN Inc. and a larger project team has been hired by the City of Prairie Village. The focus of the study is to develop a master plan for Harmon and Santa Fe Parks, specifically the incorporation of an outdoor performance space into the park. B*K’s tasks include conducting a market assessment, highlighting specific concerns and opportunities for an outdoor performance area, and finally developing an operational plan for the proposed facility. It is the opinion of B*K that the City of Prairie Village is uniquely positioned to develop an outdoor performance area in Harmon and Santa Fe Parks. The demographics of the community area such where the City would realize patronage to events held at an outdoor performance area and participation in specific programming that might take place. The demographics of the community point to an older population. Despite being older, there are at least 26% of household that has children present. The presence of a full spectrum of demographics within the community provides the City an opportunity to use the outdoor performance area as a melting pot within the community.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beautiful and Damned: Geographies of Interwar Kansas City by Lance
    Beautiful and Damned: Geographies of Interwar Kansas City By Lance Russell Owen A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Michael Johns, Chair Professor Paul Groth Professor Margaret Crawford Professor Louise Mozingo Fall 2016 Abstract Beautiful and Damned: Geographies of Interwar Kansas City by Lance Russell Owen Doctor of Philosophy in Geography University of California, Berkeley Professor Michael Johns, Chair Between the World Wars, Kansas City, Missouri, achieved what no American city ever had, earning a Janus-faced reputation as America’s most beautiful and most corrupt and crime-ridden city. Delving into politics, architecture, social life, and artistic production, this dissertation explores the geographic realities of this peculiar identity. It illuminates the contours of the city’s two figurative territories: the corrupt and violent urban core presided over by political boss Tom Pendergast, and the pristine suburban world shaped by developer J. C. Nichols. It considers the ways in which these seemingly divergent regimes in fact shaped together the city’s most iconic features—its Country Club District and Plaza, a unique brand of jazz, a seemingly sophisticated aesthetic legacy written in boulevards and fine art, and a landscape of vice whose relative scale was unrivalled by that of any other American city. Finally, it elucidates the reality that, by sustaining these two worlds in one metropolis, America’s heartland city also sowed the seeds of its own destruction; with its cultural economy tied to political corruption and organized crime, its pristine suburban fabric woven from prejudice and exclusion, and its aspirations for urban greatness weighed down by provincial mindsets and mannerisms, Kansas City’s time in the limelight would be short lived.
    [Show full text]
  • Download River Trails
    Park ront verf Ri ley rk e The Blue River B 435 A community asset in Greater Kansas City 35 Experience it. Protect it. k e Revitalize it. Enjoy it. e r Missouri River C r a g Independence Ave. u 70 S Kansas River 24 1 DOWNTOWN 2 Blue Valley Park R o ck 71 C r 31st Street ee k 35 40 3 7 4 70 5 R A 6 o B un d G rov PLAZA e C re e 56 k k . e d e v r l C rk ge B Fo d 8 Ri wn To 63rd Street lue B 9 Swope Park 10 Gregory Blvd. k 11 ree C 350 sh D ru B C D y ke B ra 435 nch . d H Bannister Rd. R a r r t e G v i e k r re R o C v In ian e d u e l B C r r r r r eek e r e C 470 an k di In 12 E Minor Park . vd Bl idge e R lu B LEGEND Blue River Other Waterway ek re F C 49 Park k aw ah Jerry Smith Park Road or Highway m o T Shared-Use Path Pedestrian/Hiking Trail Mountain Bike Trail 150 Trailhead/Parking ek State Line Negro Cre Point of Interest (see back) Wildland/Restoration Area (see back) C o ffe e C re ek h c n a r 13 B M p il m l a C KANSAS r C e MIDDLE BLUE RIVER URBAN WATERS FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP MISSOURI ek Overland Park Arboretum Experience the River: Visit these Wildlands and Restoration Areas Get Involved! A Brush Creek Oxbow and Island | On Brush Creek trail 0.3 miles west of Brush Creek Community Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Activities Guide Spring/Summer 2013
    ACTIVITIES GUIDE Spring/Summer 2013 EVENTS | 2 WATER PARKS | 4 POOLS AND SPRAYGROUNDS | 6 ATHLETICS | 8 YOUR COMMUNITY CENTER | 9 GOLF | 13 FEATURES | 15 TRAILS | 16 SHELTERS | 17 WEDDINGS | 18 LAKESIDE NATURE CENTER | 19 MUSEUMS | 21 816-513-7500 | kcparks.org VolUNTEERS & PARK PARTNERS PHOTO RELEASE Dear Friends of Parks and Recreation, Volunteering with Parks and Recreation can be a fun and rewarding experience Kansas City, Missouri Parks and Recreation frequently videotapes and photo- Thank you for your confidence and commitment to KC Parks. Your support of our department and our City was confirmed last August by for all ages. Each year, volunteers provide thousands of hours of service to parks, graphs participants enjoying our programs, special events, parks and facili- the 63% approval of Question #1. The passage of this sales tax provides KC Parks with a stable funding source and ensures that Kansas City programs and community centers and are essential to our success. Volunteers ties. These images are used by KC Parks and the City of Kansas City, Missouri can continue to have one of the best parks and recreation systems in the country. work in a variety of roles including tutoring, coaching and mentoring to youth in publications, on the web, for television/cable promotions, or to use as is at community centers; planting flowers and helping with landscaping on park seen fit. The images are used at the City’s discretion and become its sole As you glance through this Activities Guide you will notice results from the tax including extended hours in our community centers, ex- grounds; or assisting with special events such as the Ethnic Enrichment Festival, property.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Audit Starlight Theatre Concession Agreement
    Performance Audit Starlight Theatre Concession Agreement December 2005 City Auditor’s Office City of Kansas City, Missouri 17-2005 December 20, 2005 Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and Members of the Board of Parks and Recreation Commissioners: This audit focuses on the city’s benefits and costs of the Starlight concession and use agreement and the agreement’s consistency with the city’s concession policy. Goals of the city’s concession policy emphasize providing the highest level of service to the public; maximizing revenues; permitting the city the greatest flexibility; and enabling periodic physical changes in concession space. City concession contracts should be awarded following public solicitation and a competitive process. The Parks Board does not have a concession policy to set goals or priorities for Parks concession agreements. The Parks Board does not, and is not required to follow the City Manager’s concession contract policy. However, as custodians of Parks Department assets, the Board of Parks and Recreation Commissioners should adopt a concession policy to establish goals and priorities. Establishing a concession policy would safeguard citizen assets by ensuring the city receives the most benefit from the use of Starlight Theatre and other Parks assets. Citizens may not be receiving all of the benefits they could from the concession agreement with Starlight Theatre Association (STA). STA pays nominal rent for use of both the theatre and Swope Interpretive Center, even though the facilities combined are worth millions of dollars. The city receives no revenue from theatre operations while providing some maintenance support and money for capital improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • KC Parks 2018 Year in Review
    YEAR IN REVIEW2018 KC PARK & REC 2018 1 year in review Cover photo: “Big Bubbles at the Big Picnic” by Ruben Gusman Finalist for the NRPA July 2018 magazine cover 2 KC PARK & REC 2018 year in review Farewell Dear Friends of Parks and Recreation, 2018 was a monumental year. Personally, as it was my last as an employee of Kansas City Parks and Recreation. And professionally, as our department continued to open new amenities and provide enhanced programs, events and initiatives for residents and visitors alike. Reflecting on my career, I can honestly say that I enjoyed every minute of the 44 years and 7 months of service to the department and to the citizens of Kansas City, Missouri. As I prepared for my retirement, several folks asked me, ”What is the most important asset the department has?” My answer is, “the staff.” Their typical follow-up question was, ”What will I miss the most?” Same response, “the staff.” I want to thank every one of the faithful KC Parks employees for the good work that they do, day in and day out, to make Kansas City a great city in which to live, work and play. I am most proud of the staff that launched their careers at KC Parks. Many have gone on to serve as parks directors in other cities and a few as department directors right here in KC. One such individual is Teresa Rynard who began her career at Kansas City Parks and Recreation in 1987. I was lucky enough to hire her back as deputy director in 2013 with the intention that she would take the reins upon my retirement.
    [Show full text]
  • KC Parks 2008 Year in Review
    Kansas City, Missouri Parks and Recreation kcmo.org/parks Year2008 In Review Kansas City, Missouri Parks and Recreation 4600 East 63rd Street Kansas City, Missouri 64130 816-513-7500 From the Director Dear Friends of Parks and Recreation: I am proud of our accomplishments in 2008. The year was not without its challenges, but our department persevered, and as you will read in this report, produced some great Mission results. The Board of Parks and Recreation Commissioners has To improve the quality of life by providing recreational, developed five Strategic Priorities that serve as our guide in everything we do. They include youth development and leisure, and aesthetic opportunities for all citizens, and by our role in “building better kids”; green solutions as a part of planning and development process for all projects; financial conserving and enhancing the environment. sustainability to ensure equal resources for the entire community; developing plans, strategies and work procedures to increase economic We will accomplish this mission by providing quality achievement for MBE/WBE companies; and marketing our programs and services. In 2008, these priorities led to two major developments—the new KC Parks brand and the programming, making the best use of existing resources, formation of the Youth Development Task Force. developing a supportive and influential constituency, In July, we launched a new image campaign and introduced a new KC Parks branding developing effective collaborations and partnerships, and logo. The green ball design was created in partnership with the Kansas City Area Development Council and modeled after their red ball, “One KC” campaign and concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Fostering Diversity a Study on Racial Diversity in Swope Park By
    Fostering diversity a study on racial diversity in swope park by Emily Jagels A REPORT submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional & Community Planning College of Architecture, Planning and Design KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Approved by: Major Professor Alpa Nawre Abstract Race tension has increased in America as contemporary issues occur. Riots and protests are becoming common once again. The research presented shows how park space can help foster diversity and in turn improve race relations in the Kansas City area. The study shows how communities in Kansas City became segregated based on historical laws, regulations, and common day practices that reinforced racial boundaries between communities. Many still feel racial tension stemming from historical events today. A focus on integration within communities can be the first step in creating harmony and healing people who have felt these negative impacts on their lives. A literature review, including historical documents from Kansas City and similarly structured racially divided cities, such as St. Louis, Missouri, Detroit, Michigan, and Chicago, Copyright Illinois, were analyzed. Research lead to focusing in on Swope Park and the surrounding community. EMILY JAGELS Swope Park has a complex history of segregation and is located near Troost Avenue, which is one of the greatest racial divide lines in the United States. To the west of Troost Avenue the race is predominantly 2017 white while to the east is composed mostly of African Americans. On site observational surveys and short interviews with users of Swope Park were conducted to determine current use, users, and park qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER KANSAS CITY and the URBAN CRISIS, 1830-1968 By
    GREATER KANSAS CITY AND THE URBAN CRISIS, 1830-1968 by VAN WILLIAM HUTCHISON B.A., Indiana State University, 1999 M.A., Indiana State University, 2001 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2013 Abstract In the last two decades, the study of postwar American cities has gone through a significant revisionist reinterpretation that overturned an older story of urban decay and decline beginning with the tumultuous 1960s and the notion that a conservative white suburban backlash politics against civil rights and liberalism appeared only after 1966. These new studies have shown that, in fact, American cities had been in jeopardy as far back as the 1940s and that white right-wing backlash against civil rights was also much older than previously thought. This “urban crisis” scholarship also directly rebutted neoconservative and New Right arguments that Great Society liberal programs were at fault for the decline of inner-city African American neighborhoods in the past few decades by showing that the private sector real estate industry and 1930s New Deal housing programs, influenced by biased industry guidelines, caused those conditions through redlining. My case study similarly recasts the history of American inner cities in the last half of the twentieth century. It uses the Greater Kansas City metropolitan area, especially Kansas City, Missouri and Kansas City, Kansas, as a case study. I deliberately chose Kansas City because traditional urban histories and labor histories have tended to ignore it in favor of cities further east or on the west coast.
    [Show full text]
  • KANSAS CITY PARKS and RECRATION Finding Aid To
    KANSAS CITY PARKS AND RECRATION Finding Aid to Photographs (try CTRL+F on a Windows machine for keyword searching) PARKS KEY to lists: Negative number Name of park; Description; date of photo; .' name of photographer; number of photograph; additional ~. information n.d. no date n.n. no negative A1--Admiral Plaza A2--Agnes Park A3--Arbor Villa Park A4--Arleta Park A5--Arno Park A6--Ashland Square B1--Bannister Park B2--Barry Road Park B3--Belvidere Park B4--Bent Tree Park B5--Big Shoal Greenway B6--Blenheim Park B7--Bloch, Richard & Annette Cancer Survivor's Park (Roanoke Plaza) B8--Blue Banks Park B9--Blue Hills Park BIO--Blue River (Athletic Field) B11--Blue (River) Valley Park B12--Blue Valley Recreation Center B13--Blues Park • B14~-Briarcliff Greenway B15--Bridge Pointe Park B16--Brookhill Park B17--Brooklyn Park B18--Brookside Court B19--Brookside Park B20--Brown, Sanford Plaza (formerly called: Linwood Plaza) B21--Brush Creek Parkway B22--Buckeye Greenway B23--Budd Park C1--Case, Ermine, Jr. Park C2--Cave Spring Park C3--Central Park C4--Chaumiere Woods Park C5--Chelsea Park C6--Chouteau Greenway Park C7--Chouteau Park C8--City Hall Grounds (5th St.) C9--City Hall Grounds (12th St.) C10--Clark-Ketterman Athletic Field C11--Clayton Park C12--Cleveland' Park C13--Columbus Square CFORf1\~A..L.i1 WAf>I-IINC11>N ~~v/!l.lt£ f,~\C.J C14--Commonwwealth Green C15--Concourse, The (Benton Blvd. & St. John Ave.) • C16--Cooley Park 1 '. Parks PARKS 2 C17--Corrington Park ~.C18--Crestview Park C19--Crews, Nelson C. Square Park C20--Cypress Park DI--Darter, Jerry Park (formerly called: Hillcrest Park) D2--Davidson Park D3--Davis, Murray Park D4--Douglas Park D5--Drips, Andrew Park (formerly called: West Prospect Triangle Park) D6--Dunbar Park D7--Dunn, Wilbur H.
    [Show full text]
  • Fellowship Handbook
    Linda Hall Library Fellowship Handbook (Last revised: September 5, 2019) Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 II. The Linda Hall Library: A Brief History ................................................ 2 III. Library Operations .................................................................................. 3 IV. Accessing the Collections ......................................................................... 8 V. Financial and Administrative Policies ..................................................... 12 VI. Fellowship Expectations ........................................................................... 15 VII. Services Available to Fellows ................................................................. 20 VIII. Scholarly Resources in Kansas City .................................................... 22 IX. Housing ..................................................................................................... 24 X. Public Transportation ............................................................................... 26 XI. Local Attractions ..................................................................................... 28 XII. Medical Facilities..................................................................................... 35 XIII. Grocery Stores ....................................................................................... 37 XIV. Dining Options ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 YIR.Pmd
    discover Kansas City, Missouri Parks and Recreation mission To improve the quality of life by providing recreational, leisure, and aesthetic opportunities for all citizens, and by conserving and enhancing 2009 the environment. We will accomplish this mission by providing quality programming, making yearyear inin reviewreview the best use of existing resources, developing a supportive and influential constituency, developing effective collaborations and partnerships, and Mark L. McHenry leads the Blazing Paddles Racing Team at the annual Dragon Boat Festival & Races. acquiring and preserving natural features. Dear Friends of Parks and Recreation: As we move into 2010, it’s appropriate to look back at last year’s accomplishments. 2009 was a busy and challenging year for Kansas City, Missouri Parks and Recreation. We have all felt the impact of our country’s struggling economy and, as a result, have had to deal with significant change. At Parks and Recreation, we have experienced reduced staff, lowered levels of service in our parks, and revisions in operating hours at our facilities. In spite of these setbacks, we were able to continue servicing our community’s youth with enhanced recreational and educational programming specific to their needs. We also amplified our marketing efforts through the use of social media. The KCMO Parks and Recreation Facebook page went live in October. I hope you have all had the opportunity to become a fan! Another achievement we proudly attained was the reaccreditation of our department for the third time in ten years making us one of only 78 nationally accredited parks and recreation agencies in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • KCPR YIR Lo 12FEB13.Pdf
    Dear Friends of Parks and Recreation, When I think about this past year, the first words that Swope Park, we opened our second dog park, added It seems that our work is not going unnoticed. Major come to mind are THANK YOU. Thank you for your just over one-mile of exercise trails, and initiated improvements for KC Parks were seen in four areas confidence and commitment to KC Parks and Kansas installation of an improved signage system. A new of the Citizen Satisfaction survey including park City as evidenced by the 63% approval of Question event, Brush Creek ArtWalk, took place on four-miles maintenance, quality of park facilities, maintenance #1 last August. The funds that Parks and Recreation of lush tree-lined walks along the creek banks. Over of boulevards/parkways, and community centers. receive from this sales tax enable our department to the creek, the new Troost Bridge was opened with a Significant areas of improvement were reflected in proactively plan for the future and enhance our services grand celebration in May. the quality of outdoor athletic fields, walking and and amenities to better serve our residents. biking trails, and ease of registering for programs. In an effort to promote clean air and good health, Thank you to our Board of Parks and Recreation we launched a pilot program in 13 parks instituting The end of an era in leadership came to a conclusion Commissioners, both past and present, who united smoke-free zones focusing on areas where children in 2012 with the retirement of our Deputy Director for the campaign to successfully promote the play.
    [Show full text]