DOCSLIB.ORG

Development Agencies.Pdf 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development Agencies.Pdf 3 This is a list of development aid agencies which provide regional and international development aid or assistance, divided between national (mainly OECD countries) and international organizations. Agencies of numerous development cooperation partners from emerging countries such as India, Middle Eastern countries, Mexico, South Africa, Thailand, Singapore, and so on, are not included. Argentina - White Helmets Commission (Comisión Cascos Blancos)[1] Australia - Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Development Cooperation Division), formerly AusAID Austria - Austrian Development Agency - ADA[2] The Austrian Development Cooperation,[3] Austria Wirtschaftsservice Gesellschaft (aws)[4] Azerbaijan - Azerbaijan International Development Agency[5] Belgium - Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development: Belgian Policy Plan for Development Cooperation[6] Belgian Technical Cooperation - BTC/CTB [nl][7] Brazil - Agência Brasileira de Cooperação Canada - Canadian International Development Agency (absorbed into Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development Canada,[8] now known as Global Affairs Canada[9]) and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) Chile - Agencia de Cooperación Internacional de Chile (AGCI) China - China International Development Cooperation Agency (CIDCA) o formerly, Department of Foreign Aid of the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM)[10] Czech Republic - Czech Development Agency (CzDA) Denmark - Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) Egypt - Egyptian Agency for Partnership for Development European Union - EuropeAid Development and Cooperation[11] Finland - Department for International Development Cooperation (FINNIDA)[12] France - Expertise France,[13] Department for International Cooperation[14] and French Development Agency (AfD) Germany - Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW), and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Greece - Ministry of Foreign Affairs Iran - Organization for Investment, Economic, and Technical Assistance of Iran Ireland - Irish Aid[15] Israel - Ministry of Foreign Affairs: MASHAV - Israel's Agency for International Development Cooperation[16] Italy - Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Italian Development Cooperation Programme[17] Japan - Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA),[18][19] and Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) Korea - Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA)[20] Kuwait - Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development[21] Liechtenstein - Liechtensteinische Entwicklungsdienst[22] Luxembourg - Lux-Development[23] Mexico - AMEXCID[24] New Zealand - New Zealand Agency for International Development (NZAid)[25] Netherlands - Ministry of Development Cooperation[26] (has its own minister but is a part of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and The Netherlands Foreign Trade and Development Agency(NFTDA)[27] Norway - Ministry of Foreign Affairs: International Development Program[28] and Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) Poland - Ministry of Foreign Affairs: The Development Co-operation Department[29] Portugal - Camões - Instituto da Cooperação e da Língua[30] Pakistan - Pakistan Technical Assistance Programme Palestine - Palestinian International Cooperation Agency (PICA)[31] Republic of China (Taiwan) - International Cooperation and Development Fund(ICDF)[32] Romania - Assistance for Development[33] (AOD) Russia - Federal Agency for the Commonwealth of Independent States, Compatriots Living Abroad and International Humanitarian Cooperation[34] (Rossotrudnichestvo) Saudi Arabia - Saudi Fund for Development (SFD) Slovakia - Slovak Aid[35] Spain - Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID)[36] South Africa - Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA)[37] Sweden - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) Switzerland - Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), Helvetas Taiwan - International Cooperation and Development Fund (Taiwan ICDF)[38] Thailand - Thailand International Cooperation Agency (TICA) [39] Turkey - Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency (TİKA)[40] United Kingdom - Department for International Development (DFID) United States - United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Inter-American Foundation (IAF), Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), and the African Development Foundation (ADF) Multilateral Organizations African Development Bank (AfDB) Asian Development Bank (ADB) Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) Black Sea Trade and Development Bank Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) Colombo Plan (CP) Development Bank of Latin America (CAF) Eurasian Development Bank European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) European Investment Bank Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD; part of the World Bank Group) International Development Law Organization (IDLO) International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) International Labour Organization (ILO) International Monetary Fund (IMF) International Organization for Migration (IOM) International Red Cross (ICRC AND IFRC) Islamic Development Bank (IDB) Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA, part of the World Bank Group) Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation ACP-EU (CTA) United Nations (UN) United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) World Bank Group World Food Programme (WFP) World Health Organization (WHO) World Trade Organization (WTO) Non-governmental organisations[edit] ACTED ActionAid Adventist Development and Relief Agency Afghan German Management College AID Kenya Foundation AIDS No More AKDN All We Can - Methodist relief and development BRAC Business Council for Peace Camfed CARE (relief agency), originally "Cooperative for American Remittances to Europe", and later "Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere" Catholic Relief Services Centre for Safety and Development [41] Center for Victims of Torture [42] Centre for Values in Leadership Christian Aid Compassion International Dubai Cares Five Talents Giving Children Hope Habitat for Humanity International Heifer International Helpage International HOPE International Development Agency ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability International Development Enterprises International Youth Foundation Jugend Eine Welt Lamia Afghan Foundation Light for the World Malteser International Medecins sans Frontieres Medical Teams International Mennonite Central Committee Mercy Corps Mercy Relief Oxfam Peace Direct Plan International Rapid Response Samaritan's Purse Save the Children Seva Foundation Street Kids International Sustainable Sanitation Alliance Swissaid Teach For All [43] TMSS Tearfund Terra Tech Trickle Up United Purpose WaterAid Women in Europe for a Common Future (WECF) [44] World Accord - International Development Agency World Renew World Vision International Web portals[edit] Global South Development Magazine: magazine dedicated to international development Development Business DevelopmentAid Devex: jobs, news and business advice ReliefWeb .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Irish Adult Learner in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Narrative Account of My Experience of Working with Teacher Educators in Lesotho Rosarii Griffin
    Previous Back to contents Next An Irish Adult Learner in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Account of my Experience of Working with Teacher Educators in Lesotho rosarii griffin The educational context in Sub-Saharan Africa Within the African context, educational attainment is, on balance, low. There are many reasons for this. Some of them are as follows: first of all, nutrition. Malnutrition affects one in three children under the age of five. It is difficult to learn even everyday things on an empty stomach. Malnutrition is linked to ill health and ill health is linked to child mortality. Child mortality is still high in Sub-Saharan Africa. Although UNICEF reported that infant mortality rates ‘were down’ to 9.7 million children (under the age of five) dying in 2006, it was, nevertheless, down from 13 million in 1990. The majority of deaths still occur in Sub-Saharan Africa: 4.8million (BBC, Health Reports, 2009). Already, a pro- portion of the population never make it to the childhood or adolescent phase, not to mind adulthood. The survivor child might be lucky enough to attend pre-schooling of some kind: but only 14% of children in Sub-Sahara Africa are enrolled in pre-school education. Even if this child were to be enrolled, often the care is more akin to ‘babysitting’ than any educational-oriented activity going on, such as Montessori. Once of school age, the net enrolment ratios receiving Universal Primary Education (UPE) have risen since the Dakar (2000) Educational Goals, the ratio rising in Sub-Saharan Africa from 54% to 70% (and in South and West Asia to 86%).
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland's National Task Team on Rural Africa
    A Report to the Government of Ireland IRELAND’S NATIONAL TASK TEAM ON RURAL AFRICA Findings and Recommendations xxx xxx 20xx I IRELAND’S NATIONAL TASK TEAM ON RURAL AFRICA: Findings and Recommendations Cover image: Farmer Universe Mafuta and Miranda Mateyo of Irish Aid partner Musika inspect biofortified orange maize planted as part of an Irish Aid funded programme to support nutrition in Zambia II A Report to the Government of Ireland IRELAND’S NATIONAL TASK TEAM ON RURAL AFRICA Findings and Recommendations 1 IRELAND’S NATIONAL TASK TEAM ON RURAL AFRICA: Findings and Recommendations PREFACE This report connects with two significant emerging and the report and its recommendations were endorsed developments: the growing strategic importance of Africa by the AU-EU Agricultural Ministerial meeting in Rome in for Europe and Ireland, and the international recognition June 2019. that sustainable food systems have a critical role to play Ireland’s relationship with Africa has, over the past two in reducing hunger, improving nutrition and health, and decades, moved from the traditional basis of development tackling climate change. cooperation, building on the historical contribution of The relationship between Europe and Africa has evolved missionaries and NGOs, to a broader base covering the substantially in the two decades since the turn of the political, development and economic spheres. Ireland’s century. It has moved from being a predominantly aid and Strategy for Africa to 2025, published in November 2019, trade arrangement to a deeper partnership acknowledging sets out a vision ‘to deepen and strengthen Ireland’s Africa and Europe as global partners on an equal footing, political, economic and cultural relationships with with each region steering its own development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of Israel's Bilateral Aid Budget 1958-2008
    A mere ten years after Israel gained its independence from British mandatory rule in 1948, it launched an official development cooperation program. At a time when Israel was itself still a developing country, it began a training and technical assistance program that expanded within a few short years to include the dispatch of hundreds of Israeli technical assistants to other developing countries and the training of thousands of Africans, Asians and Latin Americans annually. Driven by both political necessity and the moral vision of Israel’s leaders, the program rapidly grew in size and scope. At its height, in the late 1960s and early 1970s, MASHAV, the government body responsible for managing the aid program, was the largest department in Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Israel had, per capita, one of the most extensive technical assistance programs in the western world. Unfortunately, this vision of cooperation, at least as far as Africa was concerned, proved to be short-lived. Within 15 years of the establishment The Rise and of Israel’s official aid program, the "golden age" of Israel's development cooperation came to an abrupt end, as all but four African countries Fall severed relations with Israel in the wake of the October 1973 Arab-Israeli War. Africa’s rejection of Israel dealt a deep blow to Israeli public and of Israel's political support for its aid program, marking a turning point from which Bilateral Aid Israel technical assistance has never recovered. The rupture of relations led to an immediate 50% drop in MASHAV’s operational budget and further Budget substantial budgetary cuts over the past 35 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan and the World Economy: an Assessment of Kazakhstan's Trade Policy and Pending Accession to the WTO
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hindley, Brian Research Report Kazakhstan and the world economy: An assessment of Kazakhstan's trade policy and pending accession to the WTO Jan Tumlir Policy Essays, No. 01/2008 Provided in Cooperation with: European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), Brussels Suggested Citation: Hindley, Brian (2008) : Kazakhstan and the world economy: An assessment of Kazakhstan's trade policy and pending accession to the WTO, Jan Tumlir Policy Essays, No. 01/2008, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE), Brussels This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/174857 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu The European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) is an independent and non-profit policy research think tank dedicated to trade policy and other international econo- mic policy issues of importance to Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Global Inequalities Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators
    Global Inequalities Report Global Social Policy m o c . e b o d a . k c Sustainable Governance o t s - e g Indicators 2020 e v © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2020 | 2 Global Inequalities Indicator Global Social Policy Question To what extent does the government demonstrate an active and coherent commitment to promoting equal socioeconomic opportunities in developing countries? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = The government actively and coherently engages in international efforts to promote equal socioeconomic opportunities in developing countries. It frequently demonstrates initiative and responsibility, and acts as an agenda-setter. 8-6 = The government actively engages in international efforts to promote equal socioeconomic opportunities in developing countries. However, some of its measures or policies lack coherence. 5-3 = The government shows limited engagement in international efforts to promote equal socioeconomic opportunities in developing countries. Many of its measures or policies lack coherence. 2-1 = The government does not contribute (and often undermines) efforts to promote equal socioeconomic opportunities in developing countries. Sweden Score 10 Promoting global social justice is an overarching policy goal for Swedish governments regardless of their ideological orientation. Sweden combines bilateral strategies with an active involvement in multilateral efforts toward those objectives. Additionally, public spending for development issues is comparable high. There has been a gradual shift from conventional aid to developing countries, mainly sub- Saharan countries, toward aid directed at countries that are closer to Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Aid Annual Report 2014 Irish Aid Annual Report
    Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Iveagh House 80 St Stephen’s Green Dublin 2 t: +353 1 408 2000 www.irishaid.ie www.dfat.ie Irish Aid Annual Report 2014 Irish Aid Annual Report 2014 Irish Aid 1974-2014 Four decades of reporting 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s Front Cover: Country scene, Dedza district, Malawi. Photo: Irish Aid Contents 2 Foreword 4 Year in Review 10 One World One Future 12 Framework for Action - Seven Priority Areas 16 Key Partner Countries 36 Other Partner Countries 41 Transparency and Accountability 42 NGO Partners 44 Multilateral Organisations 46 Higher Education 47 Engaging with the Irish Public 51 Annexes 2 Annual Report 2014 Foreword 2014 was a challenging year for global development. But against a background of increasing levels of humanitarian crisis across the world, there were also signs of hope in the fight to end extreme poverty and hunger in our world. Ireland has been Charlie Flanagan TD Seán Sherlock TD playing its part vigorously, through our aid programme and our foreign policy engagement. In 2014, the Government provided which our development assistance 2014, West Africa was hit by the almost €600m for Official is targeted at the poorest countries, worst Ebola outbreak in history Development Assistance (ODA), and reaches the most vulnerable. with 26,000 cases and over 11,000 reflecting the steadfast commitment It commended Ireland for directing deaths. In the wake of this disaster, of the Irish people even in the face of its policies towards the needs and Irish people can be proud of the years of economic difficulty at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Strategy Paper 2010-2014 Summary SUDA N
    Country Strategy Paper 2010-2014 Summary SUDA N KENYA Nimule Kaabong Arua Loyoro Gulu Moroto DEMOCRATIC UGANDA REPUBLIC OF T H E C O N G O O F T H E Masindi Soroti CONGO Mbale Fort Portal Mubende Bombo Tororo Jinja Kampala Entebbe Masaka Kalanga Lyantonde Mbarara Kabale TANZANIA RWANDA Contents Foreword 4 1. About Irish Aid 5 2. Ireland’s programme in Uganda 6 – context and background 3. The Country Strategy 2010-2014 7 4. Programme Components 8 4.1 Addressing Chronic Poverty and Vulnerability in Karamoja 8 4.2 Education 8 4.3 HIV and AIDS 8 4.4 Governance 9 4.5 Gender Based Violence 9 4.6 Traidlinks 10 4.7 Strengthening capacity and transparency in the energy sector 10 5. Budget 2010-2014 11 4 Uganda Country Strategy Paper 2010–2014 Foreword Ova go vile vile, Ova go dra dri (The kudu that visits the Ireland’s partnership with Uganda is based on a same grazing ground each evening risks death). This is commitment to human rights, democratic participation, an old Lugbara saying that we have kept in mind in the safety, security and prosperity for all. We will continue transition to a new Country Strategy for Uganda. The to work in a spirit of open and constructive dialogue renewal of our Country Strategy will give new impetus with Uganda to ensure that resources provided by the and direction to our efforts to help Uganda reduce poverty Irish taxpayer continue to reduce poverty, especially in and increase opportunity for its people. While the strategy Karamoja.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel 2019 Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
    IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS National Review ISRAEL 2019 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS National Review ISRAEL 2019 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments are due to representatives of government ministries and agencies as well as many others from a variety of organizations, for their essential contributions to each chapter of this book. Many of these bodies are specifically cited within the relevant parts of this report. The inter-ministerial task force under the guidance of Ambassador Yacov Hadas-Handelsman, Israel’s Special Envoy for Sustainability and Climate Change of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Galit Cohen, Senior Deputy Director General for Planning, Policy and Strategy of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, provided invaluable input and support throughout the process. Special thanks are due to Tzruya Calvão Chebach of Mentes Visíveis, Beth-Eden Kite of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Amit Yagur-Kroll of the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics, Ayelet Rosen of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Shoshana Gabbay for compiling and editing this report and to Ziv Rotshtein of the Ministry of Environmental Protection for editorial assistance. 3 FOREWORD The international community is at a crossroads of countries. Moreover, our experience in overcoming historical proportions. The world is experiencing resource scarcity is becoming more relevant to an extreme challenges, not only climate change, but ever-increasing circle of climate change affected many social and economic upheavals to which only areas of the world. Our cooperation with countries ambitious and concerted efforts by all countries worldwide is given broad expression in our VNR, can provide appropriate responses. The vision is much of it carried out by Israel’s International clear.
    [Show full text]
  • MASHAV - Israel’S Agency for International Development Cooperation Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    MASHAV - Israel’s Agency for International Development Cooperation Ministry of Foreign Affairs Inter-regional Workshop and Study Tour on Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Projects and Policies, February 2015 MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS • International organizations • Economics • Eurasia • MASHAV 2 MASHAV 1957 - MASHAV was established in 1957 Aim - To share with developing countries the know-how and technologies which provided the basis for Israel’s own development in order to empower them in their own development efforts Participants- Over 270,000 professionals , average of 2,000 per year Areas of Expertise Rural and Urban Medicine and Agriculture and Education Public Health Food Security Development Community Gender Development Equality Humanitarian Aid • Renewable energy • Smart cities • Environment and Climate Change 5 The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Sustainable Development Goals 6 International organizations Rome: Washington: UNWFP New York World Bank FAO UN IFAD YABT UNDP UNWOMEN UNICEF Paris: Abu OECD Dhabi: UNESCO IRENA Geneve: WHO Vienna: UNECE Nairobi OSCE UNAIDS UNEP IOM UNHABITAT UNODC So what does MASHAV do? Capacity Building & Trainings, in Israel and Abroad MASHAV Projects Consultancies MASHAV Extension Centers Gender equality The Golda Meir Mount Carmel and Community International Training Centre (MCTC) development. Agricultural Centre for International development and Agricultural Development Food Security Cooperation (CINADCO) The Aharon Ofri International Education Training Center 7 Affiliated Centers 9 Projects • Comparative advantage • Demand driven • Strong country ownership • Triangular Partnerships • Holistic view • 2-5 years • Model Centers • Long Term Expert, or Consultancies 10 Consultancies and Trainings • Comparative advantage • Demand driven • Practical demonstrations and training • Short term & repetitive if needed 11 Holistic Approach MASHAV alumni – future בגלל leaders • Enjoy it!.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia FTF Strategy Overview
    Ethiopia FTF Strategy Overview March, 2013, by Semachew Kassahun Context USAID / Ethiopia’s CDCS 2 Context USAID / Ethiopia’s DO 1 3 Who is in the Ethiopia Feed the Future Team? US Government: Combined Joint Task Force - HoA Partners and Implementers: • Government of Ethiopia ATA, MOA, MOH • National and International Research Institutions • NGOs • Private contractors/ consulting firms • Private Sector (Public Private Partnerships) 4 Where is the focus? 5 WHAT is the approach? Development Hypothesis: Increased investment in Productive Ethiopia can spur overall rural economic growth, which will lead to increased prosperity across all three Ethiopias when linked to efforts to promote greater economic opportunities for vulnerable populations in Hungry and Pastoral Ethiopias. 6 How is the Strategy going to achieve food security and nutrition objectives? COMPONENT 1 COMPONENT 2 Growth-led Sustainable Food livelihoods for Linking the Security Agricultural chronically Vulnerable Link productive growth vulnerable /high potential Link vulnerable Ethiopia to populations in markets “Productive Ethiopia” COMPONENT 3 Policy development and Policy and learning Capacity Enabler Cross Cutting: 7 Nutrition, Climate Change, Governance, Gender CAADP POLICY AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK PRIORITY INVESTMENTS – GOE PLATFORM PROGRAMS 1) Agricultural Growth Program (AGP)- agricultural productivity and market access for key crop and livestock products in the productive highlands. - FTF Strategy component 1 • Geographic Area: 83 woredas in Productive Ethiopia • Five years (2011-15), $320 million program • Donors: World Bank; USG; Canadian International Development Agency [CIDA]; Spain; Netherlands; Finland; UNDP; Global Agriculture and Food Security Program [GAFSP] 2) Sustainable Land Management Program (SLMP)- to improve the livelihood of land users while restoring ecosystem functions and ensuring sustainable land management.
    [Show full text]
  • SDG Challenge
    Science Foundation Ireland Future Innovator Prize SDG Challenge 2021 Call Application Handbook Version: 5 July 2021 KEY DATES • Call Launch 7 July 2021 • SESAME Open for Applications End of July 2021 • Application Deadline 6 October 2021, 13:00 Dublin Local Time • Funding Decision November 2021 • Award Start Date Q1 2022 • Concept Phase Review Q3 2022 • Seed Phase Review Q3 2023 • Prize Award Start Date Q4 2023 Terms of Reference While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of this document, it is provided for information purposes only and as a guide to expected developments. It is not intended, and should not be relied upon, as any form of warranty, representation, undertaking, contractual, or other commitment binding in law upon Science Foundation Ireland, the Government of Ireland, or any of their respective servants or agents. Science Foundation Ireland Terms and Conditions of Research Grants shall govern the administration of SFI grants and awards to the exclusion of this and any other oral, written, or recorded statement. All responses to this Call for Submission of Proposals will be treated in confidence and no information contained therein will be communicated to any third party without the written permission of the applicant except insofar as is specifically required for the consideration and evaluation of the proposal or as may be required under law, including the Industrial Development (Science Foundation Ireland) Act, 2003, the Industrial Development (Science Foundation Ireland) (Amendment) Act 2013 and the Freedom of Information Acts 1997 and 2003. Contents 1 The SDG Challenge ................................................................................................................ 1 2 Challenge Funding and the SFI Future Innovator Prize ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Developmental Effectiveness of Untied Aid: Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paris Declaration and of the 2001 DAC Recommendation on Untying ODA to Ldcs
    THEMATIC STUDY The Developmental Effectiveness of Untied Aid: Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paris Declaration and of the 2001 DAC Recommendation on untying ODA to LDCs Zambia Country Study Oliver S. Saasa Chrispin Mphuka The Thematic Study is being undertaken with the support of the Secretariat for the Evaluation of the Paris Declaration and OECD DCD. The views expressed are solely those of the study team and do not reflect the views of the sponsoring organisations. October 2009 ____________________________________________________________________________ Premier Consult Limited Offices Postal Address 29 Njoka Road P.O.Box,38163 Lusaka Zambia Olympia Park Lusaka Zambia [email protected] Tel: 260-211-290056 Fax: 260-211-290581 i Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. iv Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................. ix Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND AND APPROACH ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 ZAMBIAN CONTEXT ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]