DOCSLIB.ORG

Munk Debate Transcript

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Munk Debate Transcript Debate Transcript THE INAUGURAL MUNK DEBATE TORONTO, CANADA May 26, 2008 © The Aurea Foundation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The inaugural Munk Debate took place in Toronto on May 26, 2008. The debate’s resolution was: “Be it resolved the world is a safer place with a Republican in the White House”. The ‘pro’ debaters were Niall Ferguson and Charles Krauthammer. The ‘con’ debaters were Richard Holbrooke and Samantha Power. The capacity audience of 800 people voted 21% in favour of the motion at the debate’s outset and 46% in favour at the debate’s conclusion. The Munk Debates are a signature initiative of the Aurea Foundation, a charitable organization founded in 2006 by Peter and Melanie Munk to support Canadian institutions involved in the study and development of public policy. For more information please visit our website www.munkdebates.com. Audiomunk - Debate Rudyard Griffiths: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome. Tonight we launch a project where twice a year we’re going to bring some of the world’s finest minds, some of the world’s brightest thinkers to debate the major issues facing this country and facing the world. We’re extremely fortunate this evening, to have four exceptional debaters who will consider the question: “be it resolved that the world is a safer place with a Republican in the White House.” I would like to remind everyone that tonight would not be possible without the generosity and the support of one foundation that has underwritten this entire project from start to finish and that’s the Aurea Foundation supported by Peter and Melanie Munk. Buildings like the ROM are the lifeblood of this city and to sit here in this lovely renovated gallery with the Crystal outside to do an event like this is, the purpose of the ROM. Equally important is the intellectual capital that we create in Toronto and that we take across the country. Tonight’s broadcast will be broadcast on CBC radio and on Newsworld so that the debate in these four walls will reverberate from coast to coast and beyond our borders. Without further adieu let me introduce our moderator this evening. We’re very fortunate to have someone who knows Canada well. She was born in Bathurst, New Brunswick, went to University at Queens and the University of Toronto and has spent the last quarter century traveling around the world in trouble spots, grilling world leaders, convening events like this; and that is none other than Canada’s Lyse Doucet. Lyse, come on up and kick us off. Lyse Doucet: Thank you. Page 1 of 50 SC June 19, 2008 Audiomunk - Debate Hello and welcome to fellow Canadians, fellow debaters. Welcome to our guests from south of the border and from across the pond. I am indeed from New Brunswick and for those of you who are geographically challenged, that’s east of Toronto and northeast of Bangor, Maine. Whatever you’d like to say about Maritimers, we like to give plain truth and so are all of us gathered here this evening. I have to ask, why are we in a museum? Why are we in this magnificent Royal Ontario Museum? Is it a coincidence that they have this superb exhibition of Charles Darwin and the evolution of the species, the survival of the fittest? Peter and Melanie Munk never do anything by accident. Are they trying to send us a message? Is debating in Canada about to go the way of the Do-Do? Behind all of these screens are lots of extinct species and coincidently this debate comes at a time when the Ipsos Reid polling agency tells us that there’s a very deep public malaise in Canada about the quality and the quantity of public debating. Even worse, this debate comes at a time when south of the border there is an impassioned debate about politics in every form; and I don’t need telling you we Canadians don’t like when the Americans do things better than us, especially when it is something to do with democracy. So let it be resolved tonight, here on this inaugural debate, in this magnificent museum, that this will be the start of a new and more vigorous debate in Canada on all of the issues that matter. How are we going to start? We’re going to start on an issue, that all of us, no matter where we come from, have to be worried about: the world being a safer place. Would the world be a safer place if a Republican was in the White House? Now herein lies another difference between Americans and Canadians. Again, the Ipsos Reid pollsters asked this question in the United States. 52% of Americans said it would be safer with a Republican in the White House. However in Canada, only one in four agreed. When all of you, more than seven hundred strong, acquired your tickets for this inaugural debate we also found out about you and what you think. Only 29% of you agreed that the world would be Page 2 of 50 SC June 19, 2008 Audiomunk - Debate a safer place with a Republican in the White House. 71% disagreed with the motion. Now, you’re a educated and informed crowd, you don’t take your views lightly. You came at this voting decision by force of conviction, but can they change your mind? Can the force of argument and public debate make you think about something different? Remember Charles Darwin and those orchids. Orchids weren’t just beautiful on their own. They developed with a cross pollination of insects. Tonight we’re going to mix ideas up and see whether we get a better survival of the species. So, as the American military says, listen up we have a plan. For the next two hours, we have four of the leading thinkers and doers from the United States. We’ll give them each seven minutes to provide their arguments and to try to convince us of their case. After that, it’s time for all of us to go on the offensive. I will lead the charge with a cross-examination and then all of you have a chance to put in a question. After that, our four speakers will get one last chance to convince you that you’re absolutely wrong. Then you’ll get a chance to vote again. That’s the magic of it. Can the force of ideas change something here in this room? Please join me in welcoming our speakers. First of all, against the motion, Ambassador Richard Holbrooke. Ambassador Holbrooke has been America’s Mr. Fix-It for a long time. The New York Times hailed him as a man who is a master of missions impossible. Between ‘94 and ‘96 he was the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Canadians Affairs. In 1995, he turned his attention to the Balkans and he became the Chief Architect of the Dayton Peace Accords. He served everywhere from Vietnam to the United Nations, where he was part of Bill Clinton’s administration and now an advisor to Hillary Clinton. Also against the motion is Samantha Power. Samantha Power is a leading human rights scholar, she’s a Pulitzer Prize winning author and a Harvard Scholar. Unlike Richard she doesn’t give very much advice to Hillary Page 3 of 50 SC June 19, 2008 Audiomunk - Debate Clinton, in fact she thinks she’s a bit of a monster, now she does regret saying that so she resigned from Barack Obama’s campaign team, but it doesn’t mean she won’t be back there again because she’s got impeccable democratic credentials. For the motion, and from across the pond, Niall Ferguson: British historian, Harvard Scholar, and leading columnist. Time Magazine calls him one of the top 100 thinkers of our time. He’s also a leading supporter and special advisor on foreign policy to John McCain. And last but not least, we have Charles Krauthammer. Now as we saw from that voting, the camp that is for the motion has a really tough hill to climb. Charles Krauthammer is their secret weapon because in fact he grew up in Montreal. He’s an honorary Canadian, and on top of that he’s a psychiatrist. Since he moved back over to the United States he has become one of the most influential writers. He’s also a Pulitzer Prize winner and syndicated columnist for the Washington Post. For the last two decades he’s been influencing policy makers in the United States, but can he influence you? Join me in welcoming our four great debaters for the evening and welcome all of you too. Now to the arguments: Both sides of the argument would possibly agree that there is no other President and Commander-in-Chief who will take over in the White House at such a difficult time. There’s a challenge to restore American respect, American moral legitimacy, to win over friends and decide how to deal with foes. So please, first for the motion, Niall Ferguson. Niall Ferguson: Well, thank you very much Lyse, and thank you, ladies and gentlemen. As all Scotsmen have Canadian relatives, I knew entirely what to expect when I came here this evening. My uncle, aunt, and cousins warned me that trying to defend the Republican party in Ontario was a suicide mission straight out of the Pacific War. Page 4 of 50 SC June 19, 2008 Audiomunk - Debate However, it seems to me that there is a case to be made for this motion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 - Centre Stage and Our Debate Underway
    Munk Debate on the US Election September 30, 2016 Rudyard Griffiths: This is the heart of downtown Toronto, a city that is home to more than six million people, the skyline carved in the waters of Lake Ontario and here we are, everyone, at Roy Thomson Hall. Its distinctive exterior design, we know it well, reflective by day, transparent by night. This is Toronto’s premier concert hall. It’s a venue usually for the biggest names in entertainment, but tonight before 3,000 people the latest in a series of Munk Debates, a clash of ideas over the US presidential election. Good evening, my name is Rudyard Griffiths and it is once again my pleasure to be your moderator tonight for this debate, this important debate. I want to start by welcoming the North American wide television audience tuning in right now C-SPAN across the continental US and here in Canada coast to coast on CPAC. A warm hello also to the online audience watching right now; Facebook Live streaming this debate over facebook.com, our social media partner, on the websites of our digital and print partner theglobeandmail.com and, of course, on our own website themunkdebates.com and a hello to all of you, the 3,000 people who have once again filled Roy Thomson Hall to capacity. Bravo. Our ability year in and year out, debate in and debate out to bring to you some of the world’s best debaters, some of the brightest minds, the sharpest thinkers to weigh in on the big global challenges, issues and problems facing the world would not be possible without the generosity, the foresight and the commitment of our host tonight.
    [Show full text]
  • The Infrastructure That Matters Most.Indd
    The Infrastructure that Matters Most: The Need for Investment in Canada’s Trade Infrastructure June 2016 to Shape Policy & the Power of our network This report was made possible by the generous support of our sponsors This report was produced in cooperation with This report has been prepared by John Law. John is the President of Lawmark International and a key contributor to the trade and infrastructure debate and policy making process in Canada. He has served as the President of the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) and Chair of the Canadian Council of Deputy Ministers responsible for Transportation and Infrastructure. John is the former CEO of the Global Transportation Hub and served as Saskatchewan’s Deputy Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure. The author extends his thanks to Jody Eckert and Chandra Mark for their research support, and to Carlo Dade and Ryan Greer for their editorial contributions. In addition, the author wishes to recognize the input of the participants at the September, 2015 Canada West Foundation – Canadian Chamber of Commerce private sector Roundtable on Trade Infrastructure and Supply Chains in Toronto and the advice of senior offi cials at Transport Canada and Infrastructure Canada. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Section 1: Transportation Infrastructure and our Economic Livelihood 5 Section 2: Five Reasons to Make Trade Infrastructure an Investment Priority 8 Section 3: A Strategic Focus for the Next Generation of Trade Infrastructure 23 Section 4: Recommendations 27 Sources and References 29 INTRODUCTION What follows is an argument for enhanced trade only if our transportation network can enable the infrastructure investment, not simply as a reliable delivery of the goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Munk Debates Launches Second Season of Aclaimed Radio Program Dedicated to Civil and Substantive Debate
    MUNK DEBATES LAUNCHES SECOND SEASON OF ACLAIMED RADIO PROGRAM DEDICATED TO CIVIL AND SUBSTANTIVE DEBATE 40 weekly original one-on-one debates will explore the big issues of our time Debaters include David Brooks, Julianne Malveaux, Rahm Emanuel, Mehdi Hasan, Bret Stephens, Kimberley Strassel, Samantha Power, Alondra Cano, and many more Toronto, Canada (July 1, 2020) – The Munk Debates, one of the world’s leading forums for top thinkers to debate the pressing issues of our time, today announced the launch of the second season of its weekly radio program and podcast featuring civil and substantive one-on-one debate. The second season programming will tackle the critical issues of day from U.S.-China tensions, to the future of democracy, to the fallout of the 2020 US elections. Starting July 2020, Season Two consists of 40 episodes – one each week through June 2021— including audio versions of classic main stage Debates featuring Christopher Hitchens, Henry Kissinger, Maureen Dowd, Malcom Gladwell and many more. “We are living in a politically charged and socially divisive time, where we have largely forgotten the art of public debate," says Rudyard Griffiths, organizer and moderator, Munk Debates. "By convening smart and civil debate on challenging topics, our podcast not only helps people understand the issues driving public debate, it fosters the informed and respectful conversations we urgently need to be having." Like the iconic main stage Munk Debates in Toronto that regularly draw over 3000 attendees, its eponymous radio program and podcast features two debaters with sharply different points of view going head-to-head on a compelling topic.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 RESOURCE TOOLKIT a Guide for Canadian Planners and Urbanists
    COVID-19 RESOURCE TOOLKIT A Guide for Canadian Planners and Urbanists November, 2020 Updated April, 2021 © Lorenzo TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE 4 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 5 AGE-FRIENDLY PLANNING 12 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE 22 COMMUNITY DESIGN 29 DENSITY 40 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 44 ENVIRONMENT & CLIMATE CHANGE 60 EQUITY & SOCIAL JUSTICE 68 FOOD SYSTEMS 90 HOUSING & HOUSELESSNESS 94 INDIGENOUS ISSUES 109 MAIN STREETS 117 PUBLIC SPACES 123 RESILIENCY 134 RESPONSES & ACTIONS 141 RURAL & NORTHERN ISSUES 147 SMART CITIES & TECHNOLOGY 155 TRANSPORTATION 159 URBAN ISSUES 180 WORK SPACES 201 2 FOREWORD In 2019 no one could foresee that a year later entire countries would be shut down to curb the spread of a highly contagious virus. When the gravity of the COVID-19 pandemic became clear in March 2020, Canada, like many other nations, imposed strict “lockdown” measures on almost all sectors of society. Overnight, most Canadians became confined to their homes. Office buildings, malls, streets, public spaces and airports emptied. Only essential services, such as grocery stores, pharmacies, and gas stations, were allowed to operate under strict “physical distancing” conditions. As our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) grew and lockdown measures persisted for several weeks and months, glaring inefficiencies in community design started to become unignorable. Our response to challenges that had previously been inadequately addressed - multimodal transportation, a high-quality public realm, age-friendly and accessible planning, for example - have now become essential precursors for the creation of a resilient post-pandemic world. Conversations on the future of cities have become commonplace in mainstream society, and some of the best and brightest minds in the planning profession have made valuable contributions to this discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Munk Debate on Populism
    Munk Debate on Populism November 2, 2018 Rudyard Griffiths: Good evening. Thank you for being here for the Munk Debate on Populism. My name is Rudyard Griffiths and it’s my privilege to have the opportunity to organize this debate series and to once again to act as your moderator. I want to start tonight’s proceedings by welcoming the North American-wide television and radio audience tuning into this debate, everywhere from CPAC, Canada’s public affairs channel, to C-SPAN across the continental United States, to CBC Radio, Ideas. A warm hello also to our online audience who’s watching this debate right now via our social media partner, Facebook, on Facebook Live, and on the Munk Debate website www.munkdebates.com. And finally, hello to you, the over 2,800 people and counting — who braved some protests tonight — to be here in his hall for this important debate on this vital subject. All of us at the Munk Debates thank you for standing up for substantive serious conversation on the big issues changing our world. Thank you. Bravo. Thank you also to the Aurea Foundation who has the courage to support this series year-in and year-out for over a decade. Let’s have a warm round of applause for the Munk Family and the late, and great, Peter Munk! Tonight’s debate is happening — we all know — just days before these critical mid-term elections, and it will tackle one of the most important issues facing the Western world: the rise of populist politics. We’re going to ask tonight, from these two debaters, to answer some important questions.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Global Paradigm
    A New Global Paradigm: Understanding the Transnational Progressive Movement, the Energy Transition and the Great Transformation Strangling Alberta’s Petroleum Industry A Report for Commissioner Steve Allan Anti-Alberta Energy Public Inquiry Dr T.L. Nemeth April 2020 Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ 2 List of Tables .................................................................................................................. 2 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 II. Background/Context ................................................................................................. 5 III. Transnational Progressive Movement..................................................................... 12 A. Definitions .............................................................................................................. 12 B. Climate Change Rationale for Revolution .............................................................. 17 C. Global Energy Transition ........................................................................................ 27 i. Divestment/Transforming Financial Industry ............................................. 31 ii. The Future of Hydrocarbons ....................................................................... 40 IV. Groups Involved.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Be It Resolved, the Future of Western Politics Is Populist Not Liberal
    SEMI-ANNUAL MUNK DEBATE ANNOUNCED BE IT RESOLVED, THE FUTURE OF WESTERN POLITICS IS POPULIST NOT LIBERAL Stephen K. Bannon and David Frum convene in Toronto to debate the future of populist politics September 5, 2018 – Toronto, Canada The Munk Debates announced today the resolution for the 23rd semi-annual event, to be held in Toronto on Friday, November 2nd, 2018. The Autumn 2018 Munk Debate will move the motion: Be it resolved, the future of western politics is populist not liberal. Throughout the Western world, politics is undergoing a sea-change. Long-held notions of the role of government, trade and economic policy, foreign policy and immigration are being successfully challenged by populist-oriented thinkers and movements. Does this surging populist agenda in Western nations signal a permanent shift in our politics? Or, is it passing phenomenon that will remain at the fringes of society and political power? In short, will our politics we be shaped by the liberal consensus on trade, national identity and global affairs or by insurgent populist politics, parties and leaders? Arguing for the resolution will be Stephen K. Bannon, former chief strategist for Donald J. Trump and one of the world’s most well-known populist thinkers and campaigners. Bannon emerged on the public scene in 2016 as the Executive Chairman of the conservative website Breitbart, helping shape many of the populist policies that delivered Trump to the U.S. Presidency, and went on to hold various senior roles in the White House. He is a former Naval officer, Goldman Sachs M&A banker, and graduate of Harvard Business School.
    [Show full text]
  • Munk Debate on China Airs June 18 on WNED-TV Is China a Threat to the Liberal International Order?
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WNED ǀ WBFO Media Contact: Munk Debates Media Contact: Heather Hare Sherry Naylor Director, Corporate Communications Naylor and Associates (716) 845.7155 • [email protected] (416) 368.8253 • [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 Munk Debate on China Airs June 18 on WNED-TV Is China a threat to the liberal international order? Tickets to the Munk Debates in Toronto can sell out in just 15 minutes, but WNED-TV viewers don’t need to leave their living rooms to catch the latest debate on China and its impact on the world. “China: Friend or Foe?” airs at 10 pm Tuesday, June 18, on WNED-TV, with renowned panelists H.R. McMaster and Michael Pillsbury arguing one side and Kishore Mahbubani and Huiyao Wang arguing the other. Rudyard Griffiths is the organizer and moderator. The Munk Debates, now in its 11th year, are held twice a year in Toronto and tackle major policy issues, such as whether American foreign policy emboldens terrorists, whether men are obsolete, and whether religion is a force for good in the world. The Munk Debates are Canada’s preeminent forum to discuss the pressing issues of our time. Previous Munk Debate participants are a who’s who of world influencers, including former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, former White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon, and David Frum. The motion for the Spring 2019 Munk Debate, held May 9: is China a threat to the liberal international order? Arguing for the resolution is H.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Semi-Annual Munk Debate Announced
    SEVENTH SEMI-ANNUAL MUNK DEBATE ANNOUNCED ST “DOES THE 21 CENTURY BELONG TO CHINA?” — Former U.S. Secretary of State, Dr. Henry Kissinger, joins high powered group to debate key geopolitical issue of the coming century — Thursday, May 5, 2011 – Toronto, Canada The Aurea Foundation announced today the resolution and presenters for the seventh semi•annual Munk Debate, to be held in Toronto on Friday June 17th. To encourage public debate of the geopolitical issue of our time, the seventh semi-annual Munk Debate will table the motion: be it resolved, the 21st century will belong to China. Is China’s rise unstoppable? Powered by the human capital of 1.3 billion citizens, the latest technological advances, and a comparatively efficient system of state-directed capitalism, China seems poised to become the global super power in the coming century. But the Middle Kingdom also faces a series of challenges. From energy scarcity to environmental degradation to political unrest to growing global security burdens, a host of factors could derail China’s global ascent. Arguing for the resolution will be Niall Ferguson, one of the world’s leading historians, internationally-acclaimed author, and a prolific commentator on contemporary economics and politics. He will be joined by David Daokui Li of the Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management in Beijing. Dr. Li is an academic member of the monetary policy committee of the central bank of China. Speaking against the resolution, is Henry Kissinger, the 56th Secretary of State of the United States from 1973 to 1977 and one of the world’s most influential commentators on geopolitics.
    [Show full text]
  • View Profiles of MPP Class of 2021
    Candidate Profiles MCaasntedr oidf Pautbelic PPorloicyfiles MClasste orf o2f0 P2u1blic Policy Class of 2019 Candidate List Student Profiles Master of Public Policy Class of 2021 Page 3 Wahaj Alam Page 40 Kenza Mirza Page 4 Omar Ali Page 41 Jordan Morello Page 5 Mitchell Anderson Page 42 Sarah Mungal Page 6 Nicholas Baccala Page 43 Emma Murray Page 7 Stephanie Bertolo Page 44 Anandu Nair Page 8 Pam Bialik Page 45 Jennifer Oduro Page 9 Hannah Bourret Page 46 Maegan Ong Page 10 Julianna Campo Page 47 John Mark Padillo Page 11 Haobo Chen Page 48 Joanna Irene Patsakos Page 12 Suelan Chong Kit Page 49 Rhoda Akuol Philip Page 13 Erin Christensen Page 50 Erika Porco Page 14 An-Noura Compaoré Page 51 Aateka Rajab Page 15 Matt Condie Page 52 Jessica Kristen Rapson Page 16 John David Connolly Page 53 Haley Roberts Page 17 Duncan Cooper Page 54 Harshita Sandhu Page 18 Kayla Daneal Page 55 Nerissa Sarawan Page 19 Emilie De Monte Page 56 Iris Seo Page 20 Fatemah Ebrahim Page 57 Irene Shan Page 21 Pavlina Faltynek Page 58 Reem Sheikh-Khalil Page 22 Salman Faruqi Page 59 Melissa Slauenwhite Page 23 Karishma Firdausi Page 60 Joanne Soares Page 24 Danielle Foppiano Page 61 Emma Syron Page 25 Katie Gongjun Gao Page 62 Sara Szot Page 26 Steven Giallelis Page 63 Nicholas Thompson Page 27 Manny Gill Page 64 Andrew Train Page 28 Julia Gonsalves Page 65 Shannon Vocino Page 29 Szymon Grabowski Page 66 Anastasia Volkov Page 30 Alison Kessler Page 67 Andrea Vovk Page 31 Mahnoor Khan Page 68 Rishika Wadehra Page 32 Thea Koper Page 69 Helen Walsh Page 33 Jeanne Lee
    [Show full text]
  • Tony Blair and Christopher Hitchens to Debate Religion's Impact On
    LAUNCH OF THE SIXTH SEMI­ANNUAL MUNK DEBATE Tony Blair and Christopher Hitchens to debate religion’s impact on global affairs October 12, 2010 – Toronto, Canada The Aurea Foundation announced today the resolution and presenters for the sixth semi­annual Munk Debate to be held in Toronto on Friday November 26 th . To encourage a far­ranging discussion on one of humankind’s most vexing questions, the sixth semi­annual Munk Debate will tackle the resolution: be it resolved, religion is a force for good in the world. The debate will focus on competing claims regarding religion’s effect on human civilization, today and into the future. For example: In a world of globalization and rapid social change does religion provide the common values and ethical foundations that diverse societies need to thrive in the 21 st century? Or, do deeply held religious beliefs promote intolerance, exacerbate ethnic divisions, and impede social progress in developing and developed nations alike? Arguing for the benefits of religion will be former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Tony Blair was prime minister of the United Kingdom from May 1997 to June 2007. Since leaving office, Mr. Blair has served as the Quartet Representative in the Middle East. He works for the USA, UN, Russia and EU to help the Palestinians to prepare for statehood as part of the international community’s effort to secure peace. In May 2008, he launched the Tony Blair Faith Foundation*, which promotes respect and understanding among the major religions. This autumn he released his bestselling memoir, A Journey: My Political Life.
    [Show full text]
  • Is China a Threat to the Liberal International Order?
    SEMI-ANNUAL MUNK DEBATE ANNOUNCED IS CHINA A THREAT TO THE LIBERAL INTERNATIONAL ORDER? February 25, 2019 – Toronto, Canada The Munk Debates announced today the resolution and speakers for its Spring 2019 debate, to be held at Roy Thomson Hall in Toronto on Thursday, May 9th. The motion for the Spring 2019 Munk Debate: is China a threat to the liberal international order? Arguing for the resolution is H. R McMaster, who served as the 26th Assistant to the President for National Security before retiring from the U.S. military as Lieutenant General in 2018. He is a New York Times bestselling author, and a West Point graduate with a PhD in military history. He will be joined by Michael Pillsbury, one of Donald Trump’s top advisors on China. Pillsbury is the author of The Hundred-Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower, and the director for Chinese strategy at the D.C.-based Hudson Institute. Arguing against the resolution will be Kishore Mahbubani, former President of the United Nation Security Council and past dean of the National University of Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. Mahbubani is the author of numerous bestselling books, including 2018’s Has the West Lost It? A Provocation. Joining him will be Huiyao Wang. Dr. Wang is the Founder and President of the Center for China and Globalization (CCG) in Beijing. He was a Senior Fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School, a Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Institution, and a Senior Fellow at the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada.
    [Show full text]