Inge Lehmann's Paper: “ P'” (1936)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inge Lehmann's Paper: “ P'” (1936) 262 Classic Paper Classic Paper in the History of Geology Inge Lehmann's paper: “ P'” (1936) "We take it that, as before, the Earth consists of a core and a man- (quoted after Bolt, 1997). It was around tle, but that inside the core there is an inner core in which the that time that Lehmann "heard for the velocity is larger than in the outer one." — Lehmann (1936). first time that knowledge of the Earth's interior composition could be obtained from the observations of the seismo- graphs. I was strongly interested in this In 1936, the Danish seismologist Inge Lehmann and started reading about it" (Lehmann, (1888–1993), who worked for the Danish Geodetic 1987). In the summer of 1927, Lehmann received the opportunity to Institute from 1925 to 1952, suggested from the analysis visit some notable European seismic of P-wave data that the Earth must have an inner core stations: "I was sent abroad for three — an important breakthrough in the understanding of months. I spent one month with Profes- sor Beno Gutenberg in Darmstadt [Ger- the nature of the Earth's interior. many]. He gave me a great deal of his Figure 1 Inge Lehmann. time and invaluable help." (quoted after Photograph reproduced Bolt, 1997). She also paid short visits to from Brush (1980, Fig. 9) Inge Lehmann (1888–1993) Hamburg (Germany), Strasbourg (France), De Bilt (The Netherlands) and Inge Lehmann (Figure 1) was born on 13 May, 1888, near Copen- Uccle (Belgium) (Bolt, 1997). hagen, Denmark, one of two daughters of Alfred Lehmann, a profes- In the summer of 1928, Lehmann obtained a master's degree in sor of psychology at the University of Copenhagen, and his wife. geodesy from The University of Copenhagen, submitting a thesis on The child was sent to a small private school run by Hannah Adler, an a seismological topic. The same year, she was appointed chief of the aunt of physicist Niels Bohr. This school was co-educational, a fea- seismological department of the new geodetic institute, a post that ture that was rather unusual for the time (Bolt, 1997). As Lehmann she held until her retirement in 1953. Her task was to keep the instru- later recollected, boys and girls were treated alike: "[n]o difference ments in Copenhagen well adjusted and to instruct the staff of the between the intellect of boys and girls was recognised, a fact that remote Greenland stations. She interpreted the institute's seismo- brought some disappointment [to me] later in life when I had to grams and published the bulletins of the seismic stations. Most of the recognise that this was not the general attitude" (quoted after Brush, time, she did not have assistants, not even for office work. Original 1980). She had, for example, to reach the age of 27 before she could scientific research was not regarded as part of her duties, but she was take part in her first political election, since the right to vote was not free to pursue it, if she liked, and she published thirty-five papers granted to women in Denmark before 1915 (Bundesministerium für during the period of her appointment. Apart from her interest in the Frauen und Jugend, 1993). travel-time curves of the various types of seismic waves, which in In 1907, Lehmann entered the University of Copenhagen to 1936 led her to suggest the existence of an inner core for the Earth, study mathematics, and also attended courses in physics, chemistry, she made determinations on the reliability of seismic stations in and astronomy. (Women had been admitted to Danish universities Europe and discussed how to obtain meaningful observations. She from 1875 onwards [Rupp, 1978].) She took the first part of the also worked on small local earthquakes and on microseismic wave required examinations in 1910 and then continued her studies at motions generated by storms over the Arctic and North Sea (Bolt, Newnham College, Cambridge (U.K.), where she experienced "the 1997). severe restrictions inflicted on the conduct of young girls, restric- In 1936, Lehmann was one of the founders of the Danish Geo- tions completely foreign to a girl who had moved freely amongst physical Society, and in 1941 and 1944 she chaired the organisation boys and young men at home" (quoted after Bolt, 1997). Newnham (Bolt & Hjortenberg, 1994). (It was, it may be noted, the time of College was one of two women's colleges in Cambridge at that time, World War II, and male applicants for the position had become but though allowed to attend university lectures and sit the examina- scarce.) tions women were not admitted to university degrees before 1948 Lehmann's career was before the era when electronic computers (Alic, 1986). In December, 1911, Lehmann became seriously ill became available, so her organisation of data and computations was through overwork and was forced to return home, where she worked done 'by hand': for some years as a 'computer' or calculator in an actuary's office. In 1918, she resumed her university training as mathematician at The “I remember Inge one Sunday in her beloved garden on University of Copenhagen and graduated in the summer of 1920. Sobakkevej; it was in the summer and she sat in the lawn with a From February, 1923 onwards, she worked as assistant to the profes- big table filled with cardboard oatmeal boxes. In the boxes were sor in actuarial sciences. In 1925, she became assistant to Professor cardboard cards with information on earthquakes and the times N.E. Nörlund, Director of the geodetic institution Den Danske Grad- for these and times for their registration all over the world. This maaling (Bolt, 1997). was before computer processing was available, but the system Nörlund had become interested in establishing seismic stations was the same. With her cardboard cards and her oatmeal boxes, in Denmark and Greenland, and the best available seismographs Inge registered the velocity of propagation of the earthquakes to were used for the new stations (Lehmann, 1987). "I began to do seis- all parts of the globe. By means of this information, she deduced mic work and had some extremely interesting years in which I and new theories of the inner parts of the Earth.” (Nils Groes, a rela- three young men who had never seen a seismograph before were tive of Inge Lehmann, quoted by Bolt & Hjortenberg, 1994). active installing Wiechert, Galitzin-Wilip and Milne-Shaw seismo- graphs in Copenhagen and also helping to prepare the Greenland This method, without the help of assistants, was burdensome, installations. I studied seismology at the same time unaided …" but had the advantage that Lehmann personally saw and interpreted December 2001 263 the seismograms, paying attention not only to arrival times but also This is a simplified assumption, since in reality the velocity in to other (more descriptive) characteristics of the seismic waves, such the mantle (and again within the core) increases with depth as their relative amplitudes and 'shapes'. How this seemingly primi- more or less uniformly, due to the increasing density caused tive method helped with the discovery, e.g., of the inner core of the by the increasing pressure. There are also some smaller Earth becomes apparent in the second part of Lehmann's 'classic discontinuities within the Earth’s upper mantle, some of paper', P' (Lehmann, 1936; see below). which were already known when Lehmann wrote her paper. It was not easy for a woman to gain entry to the mathematical This simplification of the problem, omitting unnecessary and scientific establishment in the first half of the twentieth century. detail and complications, was seen as Lehmann’s strength As Lehmann said: "[y]ou should know how many incompetent men and later helped to gain recognition and acceptance of her I had to compete with — in vain" (Groes, in Bolt & Hjortenberg, idea. 1994). Lehmann tried to compensate for the disadvantages caused by prejudice against her gender by hard work. "Inge's grown-up life In Figure [2a = Fig. 1 in the original Lehmann paper] a ray passing was characterised by hard work, tough grind, a magnificent scientific only through the mantle has been drawn from the epicentre E to effort, and, finally, great academic appreciation." (Groes, in Bolt & point 1 on the surface. … Hjortenberg, 1994). Like most female scientists of her day, she never married. To have done so would almost certainly have meant the end Rays are lines drawn perpendicularly to the propagating of her scientific career. wave-front. Lehmann now calculates and explains what paths After her retirement in 1953, and when relieved from routine are to be expected for her simplified model of an Earth with a duties, Lehmann entered a second, fruitful research phase, working homogeneous mantle and core. For the purpose of our on the structure of the upper Earth's mantle and its seismic disconti- summarised version of Lehmann's paper we omit the nuities. She frequently visited seismic observatories in the USA and Canada. It was in this late phase of her career that she started to mathematics and only follow her graphical reasoning. Figure receive international recognition in the form of numerous awards for 2a of the present paper is not Lehmann's original figure but a her work and for her exceptional expertise in observing and inter- re-drawn version to make things clearer for non-specialist preting seismological raw data. "The Lehmann discontinuity [the readers. In Lehmann's simplified Earth model, the rays of the core/inner core boundary] was discovered through exacting scrutiny P-waves are straight lines. In reality, the rays in the mantle of seismic records by a master of a black art for which no amount of curve upwards, as shown in the inset to Figure 2b.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3. the Crust and Upper Mantle
    Theory of the Earth Don L. Anderson Chapter 3. The Crust and Upper Mantle Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, c1989 Copyright transferred to the author September 2, 1998. You are granted permission for individual, educational, research and noncommercial reproduction, distribution, display and performance of this work in any format. Recommended citation: Anderson, Don L. Theory of the Earth. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK:1989.001 A scanned image of the entire book may be found at the following persistent URL: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBook:1989.001 Abstract: T he structure of the Earth's interior is fairly well known from seismology, and knowledge of the fine structure is improving continuously. Seismology not only provides the structure, it also provides information about the composition, crystal structure or mineralogy and physical state. In subsequent chapters I will discuss how to combine seismic with other kinds of data to constrain these properties. A recent seismological model of the Earth is shown in Figure 3-1. Earth is conventionally divided into crust, mantle and core, but each of these has subdivisions that are almost as fundamental (Table 3-1). The lower mantle is the largest subdivision, and therefore it dominates any attempt to perform major- element mass balance calculations. The crust is the smallest solid subdivision, but it has an importance far in excess of its relative size because we live on it and extract our resources from it, and, as we shall see, it contains a large fraction of the terrestrial inventory of many elements. In this and the next chapter I discuss each of the major subdivisions, starting with the crust and ending with the inner core.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Magnitude: a Historical Perspective
    Pure Appl. Geophys. 176 (2019), 3815–3849 Ó 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1994-7 Pure and Applied Geophysics Energy and Magnitude: A Historical Perspective 1 EMILE A. OKAL Abstract—We present a detailed historical review of early referred to as ‘‘Gutenberg [and Richter]’s energy– attempts to quantify seismic sources through a measure of the magnitude relation’’ features a slope of 1.5 which is energy radiated into seismic waves, in connection with the parallel development of the concept of magnitude. In particular, we explore not predicted a priori by simple physical arguments. the derivation of the widely quoted ‘‘Gutenberg–Richter energy– We will use Gutenberg and Richter’s (1956a) nota- magnitude relationship’’ tion, Q [their Eq. (16) p. 133], for the slope of log10 E versus magnitude [1.5 in (1)]. log10 E ¼ 1:5Ms þ 11:8 ð1Þ We are motivated by the fact that Eq. (1)istobe (E in ergs), and especially the origin of the value 1.5 for the slope. found nowhere in this exact form in any of the tra- By examining all of the relevant papers by Gutenberg and Richter, we note that estimates of this slope kept decreasing for more than ditional references in its support, which incidentally 20 years before Gutenberg’s sudden death, and that the value 1.5 were most probably copied from one referring pub- was obtained through the complex computation of an estimate of lication to the next. They consist of Gutenberg and the energy flux above the hypocenter, based on a number of assumptions and models lacking robustness in the context of Richter (1954)(Seismicity of the Earth), Gutenberg modern seismological theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deep Structure of Continents
    VOL. 84, NO. B I3 JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH DECEMBER 10, 1979 The Deep Structure of Continents DON L. ANDERSON SeismologicalLaboratory, California Institute of Technology,Pasadena, California 91125 The Lehmann discontinuityat 220-km depth is an important global feature which occursunder both oceansand continents.It is a barrier to penetrationby younglithosphere and marks the baseof seismic- ity in regionsof continent-continentcollision. The stronglateral variationin uppermantle velocitiesoc- cursmainly abovethis depth. Continentalroots extend no deeperthan about 150-200 km. The basalt- eclogitetransformation and eclogite-harzburgiteseparation may be responsiblefor the geometryof inter- mediatedepth earthquakes.Oceanic and continentalgeotherms converge above about 200 km and be- comeless steep than the meltinggradient at greaterdepth. This impliesa low viscositychannel near 250 km. This would give a decouplingzone of maximumshear beneath continental shields. The Lehmann discontinuitymay be the interfacebetween two distinctgeochemical reservoirs. The velocityjump, and the inferreddensity jump, at 220 km are consistentwith an increasein garnetcontent. The mantle may be garnetlherzolite above and eclogiteimmediately below the Lehmanndiscontinuity. The transitionre- gion may be mainly eclogiteand be the sourceregion for oceanictholeiites. INTRODUCTION nental values[Jordan and Anderson,1974; Jordan, 1975].Hart et al. [1977] determined an attenuation corrected free oscilla- Continental lithosphereis much thicker than oceanic litho- sphere,but the question of how thick a sectionof continent tion averageearth model, QM2, which is comparedwith the translatescoherently during continental drift has not yet been continentalmodel SHR14 of Helmbergerand Engen[1974] in adequatelyaddressed. The bottom of the low-velocity zone is Figure 2. A more direct comparisonis the Pacific-easternU.S. usuallyconsidered to be the bottom of the asthenosphereand curve which is from Cara's [1979] surfacewave study.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation and Evolution of a Population of Strike-Slip Faults in a Multiscale Cellular Automaton Model
    Geophys. J. Int. (2007) 168, 723–744 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03213.x Formation and evolution of a population of strike-slip faults in a multiscale cellular automaton model Cl´ement Narteau Laboratoire de Dynamique des Syst`emes G´eologiques, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, 4, Place Jussieu, Paris, Cedex 05, 75252, France. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted 2006 September 4. Received 2006 September 4; in original form 2004 August 10 SUMMARY This paper describes a new model of rupture designed to reproduce structural patterns observed in the formation and evolution of a population of strike-slip faults. This model is a multiscale cellular automaton with two states. A stable state is associated with an ‘intact’ zone in which the fracturing process is confined to a smaller length scale. An active state is associated with an actively slipping fault. At the smallest length scale of a fault segment, transition rates from one state to another are determined with respect to the magnitude of the local strain rate and a time-dependent stochastic process. At increasingly larger length scales, healing and faulting are described according to geometric rules of fault interaction based on fracture mechanics. A redistribution of the strain rates in the neighbourhood of active faults at all length scales ensures that long range interactions and non-linear feedback processes are incorporated in the fault growth mechanism. Typical patterns of development of a population of faults are presented and show nucleation, growth, branching, interaction and coalescence. The geometries of the fault populations spontaneously converge to a configuration in which strain is concentrated on a dominant fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismology in the Days of Old
    Seismology in the Days of Old Den danske seismolog Inge Lehmanns sidste artikel by Inge Lehmann, Copenhagen, DK Eos, Vol. 68, No. 3, January 20, 1987, pp 33-35. Copyright by the American Geophysical Union. Reprinted with permission I may have been 15 or 16 years old, when, on a Sunday morning, I was sitting at home together with my mother and sister, and the floor began to move under us. The hanging lamp swayed. It was very strange. My father came into the room. "It was an earthquake," he said. The center had evidently been at a considerable distance, for the movements felt slow and not shaky. In spite of a great deal of effort, an accurate epicenter was never found. This was my only experience with an earthquake until I became a seismologist 20 years later. In the autumn of 1925, I became an assistant to N.E. Nørlund, who shortly before had been appointed director of "Gradmaalingen" (a geodetic institution that was in charge of measuring the meridian arc in Denmark). He had become interested in establishing seismic stations in Denmark and Greenland. He wanted everything done in the best possible way, and much attention was paid to the time service. The best existing seismographs had to be used, and they were to be placed so that they were not strongly affected by disturbing movements, such as traffic, for example. Two solid buildings, part of the fortification system that surrounded Copenhagen, were made available. My first major task was to assist in the installation of the Galitzin-Willip seismographs there.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper-Mantle Low-Velocity Zone Structure Beneath the Kaapvaal Craton from S-Wave Receiver Functions
    Geophys. J. Int. (2009) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04178.x Upper-mantle low-velocity zone structure beneath the Kaapvaal craton from S-wave receiver functions Samantha E. Hansen,1 Andrew A. Nyblade,2 Jordi Julia,` 1 Paul H.G.M. Dirks3 and Raymond J. Durrheim3 1Department of Geosciences, 407 Deike Bldg., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Geosciences, 447 Deike Bldg., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 3School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3, Wits 2050, South Africa Accepted 2009 March 10. Received 2009 February 9; in original form 2008 October 3 SUMMARY The southern African Plateau is marked by anomalously high elevations, reaching 1–2 km above sea level, and there is much debate as to whether this topography is compensated by a lower mantle source or by elevated temperatures in the upper mantle. In this study, we use S-wave receiver functions (SRFs) to estimate the lithospheric thickness and sublithospheric mantle velocity structure beneath the Kaapvaal craton, which forms the core of the Plateau. To fit the SRF data, a low-velocity zone (LVZ) is required below a ∼160-km-thick lithospheric lid, but the LVZ is no thicker than ∼90 km. Although the lid thickness obtained is thinner than that reported in previous SRF studies, neither the lid thickness nor the shear velocity decrease (∼4.5%) associated with the LVZ is anomalous compared to other cratonic environ- ments. Therefore, we conclude that elevated temperatures in the sublithospheric upper mantle contribute little support to the high elevations in this region of southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Beno Gutenberg
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES B E N O G U T E N B ER G 1889—1960 A Biographical Memoir by L E O N KNOP OFF Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1999 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. Courtesy of the California Institute of Technology Archives, Pasadena BENO GUTENBERG June 4, 1889–January 25, 1960 BY LEON KNOPOFF ENO GUTENBERG WAS THE foremost observational seismolo- Bgist of the twentieth century. He combined exquisite analysis of seismic records with powerful analytical, inter- pretive, and modeling skills to contribute many important discoveries of the structure of the solid Earth and its atmo- sphere. Perhaps his best known contribution was the pre- cise location of the core of the Earth and the identification of its elastic properties. Other major contributions include the travel-time curves; the discovery of very long-period seis- mic waves with large amplitudes that circle the Earth; the identification of differences in crustal structure between continents and oceans, including the discovery of a signifi- cantly thin crust in the Pacific; the discovery of a low-veloc- ity layer in the mantle (which he interpreted as the zone of decoupling of horizontal motions of the surficial parts from the deeper parts of the Earth); the creation of the magni- tude scale for earthquakes; the relation between magnitudes and energies for earthquakes; the famous universal magni- tude-frequency relation for earthquake distributions; the first density distribution for the mantle; the study of the tem- perature distribution in the Earth; the understanding of microseisms; and the structure of the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • MAPS CCP STACKS of P- & S-Wave RECEIVER
    LITHOSPHERIC STRUCTURE BENEATH FENNOSCANDIA BASED ON P- AND S-WAVE CONTACT ME: RECEIVER FUNCTIONS [email protected] Anna Makushkina 1, Benoit Tauzin 1,2, Meghan Miller 1, Hans Thybo 3,4,5, and Hrvoje Tkalčić 1 1 Australian National University; 2 University of Lyon, Laboratoire de Géologie de Lyon; 3 CEED, University of Oslo; 4 Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Istanbul Technical University; 5 China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China, INTRODUCTION Fennoscandia consists of geologically distinct domains of Archaean, RESULTS: MAPS Moho MLD HVZ early and late Proterozoic and Phanerozoic age at the surface. A little is known about the interrelation of these domains at depth. Moho depth obtained by picking (left) SRF CCP images (background color) and (right) PRF Map of the Mid-lithospheric discontinuity Depths of the high-velocity zone CCP images with Moho depth (background) measurements from EUNAseis [1] (diamonds) Controlled-source experiments show potential expression of suture zones extending down to 100 km depth. SRF PRF Regional studies show evidence for the mid-lithospheric (MLD), 8-degree discontinuity or the lithosphere– asthenosphere boundary (LAB), that are markers of continent formation and evolution. But each study samples a small portion of Sketch of the expected discontinuities. Fennoscandia and does not provide a Red color indicates discontinuity with increase of velocity with depth, blue – Topography map (m); white circles are stations used comprehensive model for the whole decrease. MLD – mid-lithospheric in this study system [e.g. 2,3,4]. discontinuity; HVZ – high velocity zone; Our goal is to image structural differences of the upper mantle in 3 geological domains LVZ – low velocity zone; LAB – create a unified model of Fennoscandia.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOL 460 Solid Earth Geophysics Lab 5: Global Seismology Part II Questions 1
    GEOL 460 Solid Earth Geophysics Lab 5: Global Seismology Name: ____________________________________________________ Date: _____________ Part I. Seismic Waves and Earth’s Structure While technically "remote" sensing, the field of seismology and its tools provide the most "direct" geophysical observations of the geology of Earth's interior. Seismologists have discovered much about Earth’s internal structure, although many of the subtleties remain to be understood. The typical cross‐ section of the planet consists of the crust at the surface, followed by the mantle, the outer core, and the inner core. Information about these layers came from seismic travel times and analysis of how the behavior of seismic waves changes as they propagate deeper into the Earth. Today we are going to examine seismic waves in the Earth and we will take a look at how and what seismologists know about Earth’s core. Here is a summary of the current understanding of Earth structure: To look into what seismic waves can tell us about the core, we need to know how they travel in the Earth. While seismic energy travels as wavefronts, we often depict them as rays in figures and sketches. A ray is an idealized path through the Earth and is drawn as a line traveling through the Earth. A wavefront is a surface of energy propagating through the Earth. We’ll begin by looking at some videos of wavefronts and rays to get a handle on how these things behave in the Earth. These animations were made by Michael Wysession and Saadia Baker at Washington University in St. Louis.
    [Show full text]
  • Inge Lehmann: Discoverer of the Earth's Inner Core 2/4/17, 524 PM
    Inge Lehmann: Discoverer of the Earth's Inner Core 2/4/17, 524 PM Log In | Register Select Language​▼ Search Keywords or Topics GO SHARE: (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://www.amnh.org/explore/resource-collections/earth-inside-and-out/inge-lehmann-discoverer-of- the-earth-s-inner-core) Explore(http://twitter.com/intent/tweet? Inge Lehmann: Discoverer of the Earth's Inner text=Inge%20Lehmann%3A%20Discoverer%20of%20the%20Earth%27s%20Inner%20Core&url=http://www.amnh.org/explore/resource- collections/earth-inside-and-out/inge-lehmann-discoverer-of-the-earth-s-inner-core)Science Topics Core Kids Guide to the How can we find out what’s happening deep inside the Earth? Collect Museum The temperatures are too hot, pressures too extreme, and distances too vast to be explored by conventional probes. So Resource Collections scientists rely on seismic waves—shock waves generated by earthquakes and explosions that travel through Earth and Biodiversity Crisis across its surface—to reveal the structure of the interior of the Cosmic Horizons planet. Thousands of earthquakes occur every year, and each Earth Inside and one provides a fleeting glimpse of the Earth’s interior. Seismic Out signals consist of several kinds of waves. Those important for understanding the Earth’s interior are P-waves, (primary, or A Conversation compressional waves), and S-waves (secondary, or shear with Jacques waves), which travel through solid and liquid material in Malavieille different ways. Forecasting Earthquakes Using Paleoseismology The seismograph, which detects and records the movement of Dr. Inge Lehmann (1888-1993), seismic waves, was invented in 1880.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Tomography
    Seismic Tomography—Using earthquakes to image Earth’s interior Background to accompany the animations & videos on: IRIS’ Animations http://www.iris.edu/hq/inclass/search Link to Vocabulary (Page 4) Introduction Seismic tomography is an imaging technique that uses seismic waves generated by earthquakes and explosions to create computer-generated, three- dimensional images of Earth’s interior. If the Earth were of uniform composition and density seismic rays would travel in straight lines as shown in Figure 1. But our planet is broadly layered causing seismic rays to be refracted and reflected across boundaries. Layers can be inferred by recording energy from earthquakes (seismic waves) of known locations, not too unlike doctors using CT scans (next page) to “see” into hidden parts of the human body. How is this done with earthquakes? The time it takes for a seismic wave to arrive at a seismic station from an earthquake can be used to calculate the speed along the wave’s ray path. By using arrival times of different Figure 1: Image capture from animation depicts 15 seismic stations seismic waves scientists are able to define slower recording earthquakes from 4 earthquakes. An anomaly (red) is or faster regions deep in the Earth. Those that come inferred by using data collected from stations that indicate slower sooner travel faster. Later waves are slowed down by wave speeds. something along the way. Various material properties control the speed and absorption of seismic waves. Careful study of the travel times and amplitudes can What variables yield the best resolution that allow be used to infer the existence of features within the seismologists to infer details at depth? planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Don Lynn Anderson Papers, 1968-1994
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf9c6006hj No online items Guide to the Don Lynn Anderson Papers, 1968-1994 Processed by Charlotte E. Erwin; machine-readable finding aid created by Brooke Dykman Dockter Archives California Institute of Technology 1200 East California Blvd. Mail Code 015A-74 Pasadena, CA 91125 Phone: (626) 395-2704 Fax: (626) 793-8756 Email: [email protected] URL: http://archives.caltech.edu © 1998 California Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Guide to the Don Lynn Anderson 1 Papers, 1968-1994 Guide to the Don Lynn Anderson Papers, 1968-1994 Archives California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Contact Information: Archives California Institute of Technology 1200 East California Blvd. Mail Code 015A-74 Pasadena, CA 91125 Phone: (626) 395-2704 Fax: (626) 793-8756 Email: [email protected] URL: http://archives.caltech.edu Processed by: Charlotte E. Erwin Date Completed: March 27, 1996 Encoded by: Brooke Dykman Dockter © 1998 California Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Don Lynn Anderson Papers, Date (inclusive): 1968-1994 Creator: Anderson, Don Lynn Extent: Linear feet: 1 Repository: California Institute of Technology. Archives. Pasadena, California 91125 Language: English. Access Collection is open for research. Publication Rights Copyright has not been assigned to the California Institute of Technology Archives. All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Head of the Archives. Permission for publication is given on behalf of the California Institute of Technology Archives as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which must also be obtained by the reader.
    [Show full text]