DOCSLIB.ORG

Tampa Bay Dredged Hole Habitat Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tampa Bay Dredged Hole Habitat Assessment Tampa Bay Dredged Hole Habitat Assessment: Status of Benthic Macrofauna and Sediment Contaminants Final Report David J. Karlen, Barbara K. Goetting, Thomas L. Dix, Sara E. Markham, Kevin Campbell, Joette Jernigan, Julie Christian, Anthony Chacour, Kirsti Martinez, Lyndsey Grossmann, Lauren LaMonica Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County Prepared for: Tampa Bay Estuary Program P.O. # 6861 and # 6863 TBEP Technical Report #03-18 March 2018 Acknowledgements Sediment contaminant analysis and total organic carbon analysis was done by the EPC Chemistry Lab staff: Joe Barron, Erin Blanton, Amanda Driscoll, Kathryn Ecker, Dawn Jaspard, Noel Mesa, Luke Talalaj, Amanda Weronik and Samantha White. Michael Schuman assisted with benthic sample processing. Ed Sherwood (TBEP), Gary Raulerson (TBEP), Gabrielle Nataline (EPCHC), and Nick DeSilva (EPCHC) assisted with field collections. Project Partners included the Florida Wildlife Conservation Commission/Florida Wildlife Research Institute, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Tampa Bay Estuary Program, MacDill Air Force Base, and Restore America’s Estuaries. Funding was provided by: The Southwest Florida Water Management District – Cooperative Funding Agreement 16CF000214 (not including McKay Bay dredge hole component) Tampa Bay Environmental Restoration Fund 2015 Grant (not including McKay Bay dredge hole component) Tampa Bay Estuary Program annual work plan (Purchase Orders #6863 and #6861) Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County Pollution Recovery Fund (McKay Bay dredge hole component) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (In-kind funding) Suggested Citation: Karlen, D.J., B.K. Goetting, T.L. Dix, S.E. Markham, K. Campbell, J. Jernigan, J. Christian, A. Chacour, K. Martinez, L. Grossmann and L. LaMonica. 2018. Tampa Bay Dredged Hole Habitat Assessment: Status of Benthic Macrofauna and Sediment Contaminants, Final Report. TBEP Technical Report #03-18. 105 p. ii Abstract Eleven dredged holes in Tampa Bay were sampled to evaluate their benthic habitat status and provide data for future management decisions. Samples were collected in August 2016 (fall) and March/April 2017 (spring). Sediment grab samples were collected from three sites within each dredged hole and from one reference site outside of the dredged hole during each season. Samples were analyzed for benthic infauna, sediment composition and sediment contaminants (fall only). Results indicated that four of the eleven dredged holes had clean or only low levels of sediment contaminants and supported a healthy benthic community. These included the Skyway Causeway North and South dredged holes in Lower Tampa Bay, The Venetian Isles dredged hole in Middle Tampa Bay and the Georgetown dredged hole in Old Tampa Bay. The Culbreath Bayou North dredged hole in Old Tampa Bay had moderate levels of sediment contaminants but still supported a relatively healthy benthic community. These five dredged holes are recommended to be maintained in their current state. The Culbreath Bayou South, MacDill AFB Beach and MacDill AFB Docks dredged holes all had moderate to high levels of some sediment contaminants and a poor benthic community during the fall season. The Ft. Desoto and Bay Point dredged holes had the lowest rankings due to low bottom dissolved oxygen concentrations and degraded benthic communities. The Bay Point dredged hole in Old Tampa Bay had the lowest ranking overall and may be a good candidate for mitigation. Results from the restored McKay Bay dredged hole indicated that the benthic infaunal community has improved with higher species richness and composition, abundance and higher Tampa Bay Benthic Index scores then during the pre-restoration period. However, low bottom dissolved oxygen during the fall and elevated sediment concentrations of several contaminants including lead, PAH’s and DDT were evident. Periodic monitoring in the future is recommended to continue to evaluate the recovery of this site. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... ii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Sample Locations ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Field Sampling ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Laboratory Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 4 Data Classification and Analysis ................................................................................................................ 4 Results and Discussion .................................................................................................................................. 5 Bay Point ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Culbreath Bayou North ........................................................................................................................... 12 Culbreath Bayou South ........................................................................................................................... 20 Georgetown ............................................................................................................................................ 26 MacDill AFB Docks................................................................................................................................... 33 MacDill AFB Beach .................................................................................................................................. 41 Venetian Isles .......................................................................................................................................... 49 Ft. De Soto (St. Antoine Key) ................................................................................................................... 57 Skyway Causeway North ......................................................................................................................... 65 Skyway Causeway South ......................................................................................................................... 73 McKay Bay ............................................................................................................................................... 81 Dredged Hole Ranking ............................................................................................................................ 89 McKay Bay Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 92 Conclusions and Management Recommendations .................................................................................... 94 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................................................... 95 Appendix A: Dredged Hole Sample Locations and Sampling Dates ............................................................ 96 iv List of Figures Figure 1. Tampa Bay dredged hole locations. ............................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Fall 2016 and spring 2017 Bay Point dredged hole and reference sample locations. ................... 5 Figure 3. Fall 2016 and spring 2017 Culbreath Bayou North and South dredged hole and reference sample locations. ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 4. Fall 2016 and spring 2017 Georgetown dredged hole and reference sample locations. ............ 26 Figure 5. Fall 2016 and spring 2017 MacDill AFB Docks dredged hole and reference sample locations. .. 33 Figure 6. Fall 2016 and spring 2017 MacDill AFB Beach dredged hole and reference sample locations. .. 41 Figure 7. Fall 2016 and spring 2017 Venetian Isles dredged hole and reference sample locations. .......... 49 Figure 8. Fall 2016 and spring 2017 Ft. De Soto (St. Antoine Key) dredged hole and reference sample locations. ..................................................................................................................................................... 57 Figure 9. Fall 2016 and spring 2017 Skyway Causeway North dredged hole and reference
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Addison Bay, 64 Advanced Sails, 351
    FL07index.qxp 12/7/2007 2:31 PM Page 545 Index A Big Marco Pass, 87 Big Marco River, 64, 84-86 Addison Bay, 64 Big McPherson Bayou, 419, 427 Advanced Sails, 351 Big Sarasota Pass, 265-66, 262 Alafia River, 377-80, 389-90 Bimini Basin, 137, 153-54 Allen Creek, 395-96, 400 Bird Island (off Alafia River), 378-79 Alligator Creek (Punta Gorda), 209-10, Bird Key Yacht Club, 274-75 217 Bishop Harbor, 368 Alligator Point Yacht Basin, 536, 542 Blackburn Bay, 254, 260 American Marina, 494 Blackburn Point Marina, 254 Anclote Harbors Marina, 476, 483 Bleu Provence Restaurant, 78 Anclote Isles Marina, 476-77, 483 Blind Pass Inlet, 420 Anclote Key, 467-69, 471 Blind Pass Marina, 420, 428 Anclote River, 472-84 Boca Bistro Harbor Lights, 192 Anclote Village Marina, 473-74 Boca Ciega Bay, 409-28 Anna Maria Island, 287 Boca Ciega Yacht Club, 412, 423 Anna Maria Sound, 286-88 Boca Grande, 179-90 Apollo Beach, 370-72, 376-77 Boca Grande Bakery, 181 Aripeka, 495-96 Boca Grande Bayou, 188-89, 200 Atsena Otie Key, 514 Boca Grande Lighthouse, 184-85 Boca Grande Lighthouse Museum, 179 Boca Grande Marina, 185-87, 200 B Boca Grande Outfitters, 181 Boca Grande Pass, 178-79, 199-200 Bahia Beach, 369-70, 374-75 Bokeelia Island, 170-71, 197 Barnacle Phil’s Restaurant, 167-68, 196 Bowlees Creek, 278, 297 Barron River, 44-47, 54-55 Boyd Hill Nature Trail, 346 Bay Pines Marina, 430, 440 Braden River, 326 Bayou Grande, 359-60, 365 Bradenton, 317-21, 329-30 Best Western Yacht Harbor Inn, 451 Bradenton Beach Marina, 284, 300 Big Bayou, 345, 362-63 Bradenton Yacht Club, 315-16,
    [Show full text]
  • Legals 07.29.16.Indd
    LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT CITRUS COUNTY CITRUS COUNTY HERNANDO COUNTY HERNANDO COUNTY HERNANDO COUNTY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NOTICE OF SALE HERNANDO COUNTY NJ-15-199889 ROBERT MELACCIO, JR.; et al., 5TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR NOTICE IS GIVEN that, in accordance 7/29-8/5/16 2T Defendants. CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA —————————————————— with the Final Judgment of Foreclosure IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NOTICE OF SALE GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION entered on July 7, 2016 in the above- FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE styled cause, Angela Vick, Citrus county FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NOTICE is hereby given that pursuant to CASE NO.: 2015 CA 000505 A HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA the Final Judgment of Foreclosure entered clerk of court shall sell to the highest and CIVIL ACTION HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, best bidder for cash on August 11, 2016 CIVIL ACTION in the cause pending in the Circuit Court LLC, CASE NO.: 10002052CAXXHX of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, in and at 10:00 A.M., at www.citrus.realforeclose. CASE NO.: 272015CA000756CAAXMX PLAINTIFF, com, the following described property: for Hernando County, Florida, Case No. US BANK NA, 2015-CA-000266, in which CHRISTIANA VS. LOT 11, BLOCK “C”, HILLCREST Plaintiff, MID-ISLAND MORTGAGE CORP, Plaintiff, TRUST, A DIVISION OF WILMINGTON HEATHER L. DIXON, ET AL., ESTATES REVISED, ACCORDING vs. SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS DEFENDANT(S). TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, MARIE VANNATTEN, et al, vs. TRUSTEE FOR STANWICH MORT- AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK Defendant(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY FOR THE SEIR FOR WIDENING U.S. 301 FROM FALKENBURG ROAD TO CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD Hillsborough County, Florida Prepared for Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 10117 Princess Palm Ave Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33610 Prepared by Janus Research 1300 N. Westshore Boulevard, Suite 100 Tampa, Florida 33607 FINAL REPORT CRAS for the SEIR for Widening U.S. 301 from Falkenburg Road to Causeway Boulevard Hillsborough County November 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS) for the State Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for Widening U.S. 301 from Falkenburg Road to Causeway Boulevard in Hillsborough County, Florida was undertaken at the request of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The objective of this survey, which was conducted in November, 2006, was to identify cultural resources within or adjacent to the project area and assess their eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) according to the criteria set forth in 36 CFR Section 60.4. This assessment was designed and implemented to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (as amended) as implemented by 36 CFR 800 (Protection of Historic Properties, effective January 2001); Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 USC 4321 et seq.), as implemented by the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508); Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended (49 USC 303); Chapter 267, Florida Statutes; and the minimum field methods, data analysis, and reporting standards embodied in the Florida Division of Historical Resources’ (FDHR) Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (February 2003), and Chapter 1A-46 (Archaeological and Historical Report Standards and Guidelines), Florida Administrative Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Tampa's Tomorrow
    TRANSFORMING TAMPA’S TOMORROW Blueprint for Tampa’s Future Recommended Operating and Capital Budget Part 2 Fiscal Year 2020 October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020 Recommended Operating and Capital Budget TRANSFORMING TAMPA’S TOMORROW Blueprint for Tampa’s Future Fiscal Year 2020 October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020 Jane Castor, Mayor Sonya C. Little, Chief Financial Officer Michael D. Perry, Budget Officer ii Table of Contents Part 2 - FY2020 Recommended Operating and Capital Budget FY2020 – FY2024 Capital Improvement Overview . 1 FY2020–FY2024 Capital Improvement Overview . 2 Council District 4 Map . 14 Council District 5 Map . 17 Council District 6 Map . 20 Council District 7 Map . 23 Capital Improvement Program Summaries . 25 Capital Improvement Projects Funded Projects Summary . 26 Capital Improvement Projects Funding Source Summary . 31 Community Investment Tax FY2020-FY2024 . 32 Operational Impacts of Capital Improvement Projects . 33 Capital Improvements Section (CIS) Schedule . 38 Capital Project Detail . 47 Convention Center . 47 Facility Management . 49 Fire Rescue . 70 Golf Courses . 74 Non-Departmental . 78 Parking . 81 Parks and Recreation . 95 Solid Waste . 122 Technology & Innovation . 132 Tampa Police Department . 138 Transportation . 140 Stormwater . 216 Wastewater . 280 Water . 354 Debt . 409 Overview . 410 Summary of City-issued Debt . 410 Primary Types of Debt . 410 Bond Covenants . 411 Continuing Disclosure . 411 Total Principal Debt Composition of City Issued Debt . 412 Principal Outstanding Debt (Governmental & Enterprise) . 413 Rating Agency Analysis . 414 Principal Debt Composition . 416 Governmental Bonds . 416 Governmental Loans . 418 Enterprise Bonds . 419 Enterprise State Revolving Loans . 420 FY2020 Debt Service Schedule . 421 Governmental Debt Service . 421 Enterprise Debt Service . 422 Index .
    [Show full text]
  • Tampa Bay Region
    Fiscal Year 2019 Cooperative Funding Initiative Applications Tampa Bay Region Coop Funding By Region For FY2019 Tampa Bay Region Project Project Name Project Cost N492 Lower Hillsborough River Dam Control Gate Facilities $2,299,683 N665 DAR - Clearwater Groundwater Replenishment Project Phase 3 $32,716,000 N748 SW IMP - FP - Dale Mabry Henderson Trunkline - Upper Peninsula Watershed Drainage Improv. $40,000,000 N773 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Cypress Street Outfall Regional Stormwater Improvements $30,000,000 N791 Reclaimed Water - Pasco County Starkey Ranch Reclaimed Water Transmission Project - Project C $913,600 N803 WMP - Anclote River Watershed Management Plan $800,000 N836 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Zephyr Creek Drainage improvements: Units 1 & 2 $2,150,000 N837 Reclaimed Water - Pasco Co. Cypress Preserve Recl. Water Transmission Project Year 2 of 2 $350,000 N850 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Sea Pines Neighborhood Flood Abatement $4,500,000 N855 DAR - South Hillsborough Aquifer Recharge Expansion (SHARE) - Phase 1 $10,500,000 N859 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Holiday Hill Subdivision Drainage Improvement $1,100,000 N865 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Magnolia Valley Storage and Wetland Enhancement $13,193,000 N867 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Palm Avenue Flooding Abatement $499,958 N870 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Colonial Manor Drainage Improvement $2,400,000 N901 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Port Richey Alternative Outfall $3,250,000 N913 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Ironbark Flood Abatement $4,110,000 N915 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Lower Spring Branch Conveyance Improvements $3,320,000 N924 WMP - Lake Tarpon Watershed Management Plan - Flood Study $300,000 N943 Restoration - Central Pasco Recharge Wetlands Facility Optimization $14,951,806 N949 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Southeast Seminole Heights Flood Relief $30,000,000 N953 SW IMP - Flood Protection - Salt Springs $600,000 N954 Conservation-Florida Friendly Landscape Program- Public Education $473,701 N955 Conservation - St.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2019 Jane Castor Mayor Dennis R. Rogero, Jr., CGFO Chief Financial Officer Prepared by the Department of Revenue and Finance Please visit us at https://www.tampagov.net Introductory Section Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting............... 11 Mayor of Tampa and Organization Chart..................................................................................................................................... 13 Tampa City Council Members...................................................................................................................................................... 15 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report...................................................................................................................................................... 19 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)........................................................................................................................ 25 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Meeting Date: August 14, 2017 Agenda Item: TA/CPA 17-05 Future Land Use Map Amendment 3702 West Roland Street Prepared By: Tony Lacolla, AICP Ext
    Executive Summary Meeting Date: August 14, 2017 Agenda Item: TA/CPA 17-05 Future Land Use Map Amendment 3702 West Roland Street Prepared by: Tony LaColla, AICP ext. 350 Presented by: Jennifer Malone ext. 324 Action Necessary: Yes Summary: The Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan is the official document guiding the long-term development of the City of Tampa. The Planning Commission is required to make recommendations to the Tampa City Council on all proposed changes to the Imagine 2040: Tam pa Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Chapter 97-351, Laws of Florida as amended. Plan Amendment TA/CPA 17-05 is a privately initiated request to amend the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan Map. The proposed amendment would allow for higher residential density. The subject site is located in the South Tampa Planning District, on the southwest corner of West Roland Street and South Sterling Avenue. The request is to change the Future Land Use designation for an approximate 0.19- acre subject site from Residential-10 (R-10) to Residential-20 (R-20). Currently, the site is being used as a single family home. The proposed Plan Amendment, which allows consideration of up to 20 units per acre, would allow for the subject site to see a potential maximum of three residential units on site. The maximum Floor Area Ratio would also increase, from the current 0.35 to a 0.50. Under the adopted Residential-10 category, the subject site could be utilized for single family detached residential development with limited townhomes considered.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Tampa Tree Canopy and Urban Forest Analysis 2016
    City of Tampa Tree Canopy and Urban Forest Analysis 2016 City of Tampa Tree Canopy and Urban Forest Analysis 2016 Final Report to the City of Tampa March 2018 Authors Dr. Shawn M. Landry, University of South Florida Dr. Andrew K. Koeser, University of Florida Robert J. Northrop, UF/IFAS Extension, Hillsborough County Drew McLean, University of Florida Dr. Geoffrey Donovan, U.S. Forest Service Dr. Michael G. Andreu, University of Florida Deborah Hilbert, University of Florida Project Contributors Jan Allyn, University of South Florida Kathy Beck, City of Tampa Catherine Coyle, City of Tampa Rich Hammond, University of South Florida Eric Muecke, City of Tampa Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne, University of Vermont Dr. Ruiliang Pu, University of South Florida Cody Winter, University of South Florida Quiyan Yu, University of South Florida Special Thanks Fredrick Hartless, Hillsborough County Landowners and residents of the City of Tampa City of Tampa Urban Forest Management Internal Technical Working Group City of Tampa Natural Resources Advisory Committee Citation for this report: Landry S., Koeser, A., Northrop, R., McLean, D., Donovan, G., Andreu, M. & Hilbert, D. (2018). City of Tampa Tree Canopy and Urban Forest Analysis 2016. Tampa, FL: City of Tampa, Florida. Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 9 The Benefits of Trees ................................................................................. 14 Project Methods Study Area ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������17
    [Show full text]
  • Mira Lago West Community Development District
    Mira Lago West Community Development District Board of Supervisors’ Meeting October 2nd, 2017 District Office: 9428 Camden Field Parkway Riverview, Florida 33578 813.533.2950 www.MiraLagoWestCDD.org MIRA LAGO WEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AGENDA October 2nd, 2017 at 7:00 P.M. SouthShore Regional Library 15816 Beth Shields Way, Ruskin, FL 33573 District Board of Supervisors Lennie Fine Chairman Hector Ortiz Vice Chairman Jennifer Parra Assistant Secretary Robert McCarthy Assistant Secretary Simon Schmieder Assistant Secretary District Manager Grant Phillips Rizzetta & Company, Inc. District Attorney Scott Steady Burr Forman, LLP District Engineer Rick Schappacher Schappacher Engineering & Surveying, Inc. All cellular phones and pagers must be turned off while in the meeting room. The District Agenda is comprised of five different sections: The meeting will begin promptly at 7:00 p.m. with the first section which is called Audience Comments. The Audience Comments portion of the agenda is when individuals may comment on matters that concern the District. Each individual is limited to three (3) minutes for such comment. The Board of Supervisors or Staff is not obligated to provide a response until sufficient time for research or action is warranted. IF THE COMMENT CONCERNS A MAINTENANCE RELATED ITEM, THE ITEM WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE DISTRICT MANAGER OUTSIDE THE CONTEXT OF THIS MEETING. The second section is called Business Administration. The Business Administration section contains items that require the review and approval of the District Board of Supervisors as a normal course of business. The third section is called Business Items. The Business Items section contains items for approval by the District Board of Supervisors that may require discussion, motion and votes on an item-by-item basis.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Tampa 2011 Urban Forest Analysis the Structure, Composition, Function and Economic Benefits of Trees and the Urban Forest
    City of Tampa 2011 Urban Forest Analysis The Structure, Composition, Function and Economic Benefits of Trees and the Urban Forest September 2013 (This page left blank intentionally.) Report Printed on Recycled Paper Acknowledgments Authors Dr. Shawn M. Landry, University of South Florida Robert J. Northrop, UF/IFAS Extension, Hillsborough County Dr. Michael G. Andreu, University of Florida Carolyn Cheatham Rhodes, University of Florida Project Contributors Jan Allyn, University of South Florida Kathy Beck, City of Tampa Catherine Coyle, City of Tampa Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne, University of Vermont Dr. Ruiliang Pu, University of South Florida Special Thanks Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn and the Tampa City Council; Members of the Tampa Steering Committee on Urban Forest Sustainability, including: Richard Bailey (Richard Bailey Professional Forester, Inc.), Gary Brown (Sterling Bay Homes), David Crawley (URS Corporation), Cliff Fer- nandez (Dolphin Home Builders), Evan Johnson (Tindale/Oliver & Associ- ates), Wofford Johnson (Representative, Tampa Homeowners, An Associa- tion of Neighborhoods), David Rigall (Rigall/Design LLC) and John Webster (Tampa Electric); Bob McDonaugh, Administrator for Economic Opportuni- ties, City of Tampa. Project assistance from current and former City of Tam- pa staff members, including: Robert Irving, Larry Cesarsky, Danielle San- ford, Thomas Snelling, Brad Suder and Karen Palus; Students and staff from the University of South Florida: Elizabeth Ciesla, David Eilers, Darcy Everett, Richard Hammond, Cheran Williams and Jingcheng Zhang; Students and staff from the University of Florida: Erin Gilbert, Melissa Friedman, Ashley Tyer; Sean MacFaden, Keith Pelletier and Anna Royar of the University of Vermont; Al Karlin, Ekaterina Fitos, Jessica Hendrix and staff of the South- west Florida Water Management District for providing aerial imagery and LiDAR data; we also want to express our appreciation to private land own- ers, homeowners and businesses for allowing us to access their property.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security United States Coast Guard
    U.S. Department of Homeland Security United States Coast Guard LOCAL NOTICE TO MARINERS District: 7 Week: 20/15 LITTLE RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA TO ECONFINA RIVER, FLORIDA (INCLUDES PUERTO RICO AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS) Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District (dpw) Brickell Plaza Federal Building 909 SE 1st Avenue, Room 406 Miami, Florida 33131-3028 Telephone (305) 415-6750 Fax (305) 415-6757 Report any Aids to Navigation discrepancies, shoaling, hazard to navigation and Bridge discrepancies including lighting to the nearest Coast Guard unit. After business hours, emergencies or holidays contact one of the 24 hour Command Centers listed below: DISTRICT 7 (305) 415-6800 SECTOR CHARLESTON (843) 740-7050 from Little River to Isle of Palms and St Simons Sound SECTOR JACKSONVILLE (904) 564-7511 or 7513 from St Marys Entrance to Kings Bay to ICW-MI 915to MI 1005 SECTOR MIAMI (305) 535-4472 from Fort Pierce Harbor to Everglades Nat’l Park to Naples Bay SECTOR KEY WEST (305) 292-8727 from Hawk Chl & Reef Line to Rebecca Shoal and Dry Tortugas Nat’l Park SECTOR ST PETERSBURG (727) 824-7506 from OWW, Caloosahatchee River (Moore Haven MI 80 to San Carlos Bay MI 0) to Mullet Key to Fenholloway River SECTOR SAN JUAN (787) 729-2041 from Puerto Rico North Coast Arecibo to Cabo San Juan to US Virgin Islands-St Croix BROADCAST NOTICE TO MARINERS Navigation information having been of immediate concern to the Mariner, and promulgated by the following broadcasts, has been incorporated in this notice when still effective: - CCGD7 (D7) BNM 175-15 to 188-15
    [Show full text]
  • Cordoba Ranch Community Development District
    CORDOBA RANCH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DISTRICT OFFICE · 3434 COLWELL AVENUE · SUITE 200 · TAMPA, FLORIDA 33614 CORDOBA RANCH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING APRIL 28, 2015 CORDOBA RANCH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AGENDA APRIL 28, 2015 9:30 a.m. Cordoba Ranch Model Center located at 2516 Cordoba Ranch Blvd. Lutz, FL 33559 District Board of Supervisors Barry Karpay Chairman Garth Noble Vice Chairman Heather Jaxheimer-Mills Assistant Secretary Matt Lovo Assistant Secretary Rick Woodley Assistant Secretary District Manager Joseph Roethke Rizzetta & Company, Inc. District Counsel Vivek Babbar or Tracy Robin Straley & Robin District Engineer Todd Amaden Landmark Engineering, LLC All Cellular phones and pagers must be turned off while in the meeting room. The District Agenda is comprised of five different sections: The meeting will begin promptly at 9:30 a.m. with the first section which is called Audience Comments. The Audience Comment portion of the agenda is where individuals may comment on matters that concern the District. Each individual is limited to three (3) minutes for such comment. The Board of Supervisors or Staff is not obligated to provide a response until sufficient time for research or action is warranted. IF THE COMMENT CONCERNS A MAINTENANCE RELATED ITEM, THE ITEM WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE DISTRICT MANAGER OUTSIDE THE CONTEXT OF THIS MEETING. The second section is called Business Administration. The Business Administration section contains items that require the review and approval of the District Board of Supervisors as a normal course of business. The third section is called Business Items. The business items section contains items for approval by the District Board of Supervisors that may require discussion, motion and votes on an item-by-item basis.
    [Show full text]