Eustatic Curve for the Middle Jurassic–Cretaceous Based on Russian Platform and Siberian Stratigraphy: Zonal Resolution1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eustatic Curve for the Middle Jurassic–Cretaceous Based on Russian Platform and Siberian Stratigraphy: Zonal Resolution1 Eustatic Curve for the Middle Jurassic–Cretaceous Based on Russian Platform and Siberian Stratigraphy: Zonal Resolution1 D. Sahagian,2 O. Pinous,2 A. Olferiev,3 and V. Zakharov4 ABSTRACT sediment gaps left by unconformities in the cen- tral part of the Russian platform with data from We have used the stratigraphy of the central part stratigraphic information from the more continu- of the Russian platform and surrounding regions to ous stratigraphy of the neighboring subsiding construct a calibrated eustatic curve for the regions, such as northern Siberia. Although these Bajocian through the Santonian. The study area is sections reflect subsidence, the time scale of vari- centrally located in the large Eurasian continental ations in subsidence rate is probably long relative craton, and was covered by shallow seas during to the duration of the stratigraphic gaps to be much of the Jurassic and Cretaceous. The geo- filled, so the subsidence rate can be calculated graphic setting was a very low-gradient ramp that and filtered from the stratigraphic data. We thus was repeatedly flooded and exposed. Analysis of have compiled a more complete eustatic curve stratal geometry of the region suggests tectonic sta- than would be possible on the basis of Russian bility throughout most of Mesozoic marine deposi- platform stratigraphy alone. tion. The paleogeography of the region led to Relative sea level curves were generated by back- extremely low rates of sediment influx. As a result, stripping stratigraphic data from well and outcrop accommodation potential was limited and is inter- sections distributed throughout the central part of preted to have been determined primarily by the Russian platform. For determining paleowater eustatic variations. The central part of the Russian depth, we developed a model specifically designed platform thus provides a useful frame of reference for this region based on paleoecology, sedimentolo- for the quantification of eustatic variations through- gy, geochemistry, and paleogeography. out the Jurassic and Cretaceous. The curve describes a series of high-frequency The biostratigraphy of the Russian platform pro- eustatic events superimposed on longer term vides the basis for reliably determining age and trends. Many of the events identified from our eustatic events. The Mesozoic section of the cen- study can be correlated to those found by Haq et al. tral part of the Russian platform is characterized (1988) and other sea level studies from other parts by numerous hiatuses. In this study, we filled the of the world, but there are significant differences in the relative magnitudes of events. Because the eustatic curve resulting from this study is based on ©Copyright 1996. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All a stable reference frame, the curve can be used in rights reserved. 1Manuscript received May 18, 1995; revised manuscript received January sedimentary basin modeling and as a tool for quan- 8, 1996; final acceptance April 12, 1996. tifying subsidence history from the stratigraphy of 2Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space and Department of passive margins, basins, and other active regions. Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824-3525. 3Centrgeologia, Washavskoje Shosse 39 A, 105103, Moscow, Russia. 4Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, Russia. Russian platform stratigraphic data are offered under the AAPG INTRODUCTION Bulletin Datashare program (Data 8). Users can obtain the data set in one of two ways: (1) write to AAPG Bulletin Datashare, P.O. Box 979, Tulsa Eustasy is controlled by the relative volumes of Oklahoma 74101-0979, USA, and include US $5.00 for shipping and handling, or fax your credit card number (please specify DOS or Macintosh); the global ocean basins and global ocean water or (2) download the file for free from the Internet (http://www.geobyte.com/ (Sahagian and Watts, 1991; Sahagian and Jones, download.html). 1993). Long-term relative sea level changes (>1 This project was supported by NSF (EAR9218945) and a GSA student research grant. The paper substantially benefited from discussions with m.y.) have been observed qualitatively through S. Jacobson, A. Beisel, D. Naidin, J. Collinson, and H. Tischler. Thanks go to their effects on the depositional patterns and shore- Y. Bogomolov and B. Shurygin for field assistance. The authors are grateful to AAPG reviewers W. Devlin, G. Ulmishek, and G. Baum for very helpful line processes of marine facies. However, quantifi- comments. cation of eustatic changes has been hampered by AAPG Bulletin, V. 80, No. 9 (September 1996), P. 1433–1458. 1433 1434 Mesozoic Eustasy 30 40 50 Figure 1—Sketch map of major structures of the Russian platform. 70 70 Baltic Shield Timan Pechora Ob Uplift Sev. Onega Lake Dvina Ladoga Lake Kama ion 60 ess 60 r St. Petersburg ep D w Sukhonskii Swell o Volga sc o M Volga-Ural S Moscow Arch Belorussian Minsk Arch Ryazan-Saratov Trough Voronezh Arch Trough Dnepr-Donetsk Ulyanovsk-SaratovSaratov Kiev Depression Voronezh Caspian Ukrainian Dnepr Depression 50 50 Donetsk Ural Folded Zone Don Volga Shield Rostov Odessa CaspianSea 0 200 km Danube Black Sea 40 50 30 positive structures cross section stable area with preserved boundary of the platform Jurassic and Cretaceous sediments the lack of an adequate system of measure for this along continental margins (Vail et al., 1977; Jervey, relationship. Although some workers have consid- 1988; Posamentier et al., 1988). Sea level changes ered it impossible to accurately determine eustatic can be estimated by applying backstripping tech- variations (Kendall and Lerche, 1988), other work- niques (Angevine et al., 1990). Because water- ers have suggested that a eustatic curve should ide- depth variations are an important term in back- ally be based on the stratigraphy of a tectonically stripping analyses, eustatic variations can be quiescent region for each time interval considered quantified only to the resolution of the available (Hallam, 1992). We have identified the central part paleodepth indicators, which are most reliable in of the Russian platform (Figure 1), based on its gen- shallow environments. In most tectonic environ- erally flat-lying and otherwise relatively undisturbed ments, water depth is not solely dependent on stratigraphy, as a useful reference for eustatic sea eustasy (Baum et al., 1994), and in subsiding basins level quantification for the Middle Jurassic through where subsidence depends on distance from a the Cretaceous. hinge, position also controls the relation between One way to observe sea level changes is eustasy and water depth (Loutit et al., 1988). In through the effect on sedimentation patterns this study, we examine the relationship between Sahagian et al. 1435 eustasy and sedimentation by quantifying water Moscow depression, a subsiding graben complex depth variations on a shallow platform sea. with thick Paleozoic sedimentary fill in the central Eustatic curves have been compiled in the past part of the Russian platform (Figure 1). The (Hallam, 1988; Haq et al., 1988; Harrison, 1988). Mesozoic stratigraphy analyzed here is based on Commonly, these curves have relied on methods of wells and outcrops on and near the extinct calculating tectonic activity (usually subsidence) to Moscow depression, referred to as the “Moscow separate tectonic and eustatic signals reflected in syneclise” in the Russian literature. stratigraphic sequences or paleohypsometric pro- By the Jurassic, the subsiding Moscow depres- files (Greenlee and Moore, 1988). The errors inher- sion stabilized. This interpretation is supported by ent in these calculations of passive-margin subsi- the uniformity and relatively thin nature of dence histories (e.g., Watts and Steckler, 1979) may Mesozoic beds over great distances. For example, have been larger than the total sea level signal the Oxfordian shale facies between the Ryazan inferred on time scales of tens of millions of years. region and Unzha River sections (located about 600 Thus, these curves have necessarily been qualita- km apart) displays similar isopachs down to the tive, at best can be used for only short time intervals ammonite zone level. The thickness of the entire (<10 m.y.), and are limited by cumulative errors in Mesozoic package increases in the marginal subsid- subsidence calculations. By using an epeirogenically ing regions (e.g., Caspian depression, Dnepr- stable part of the lithosphere (central part of the Donetsk depression). Russian platform) as a reference frame, this limita- The presence of a great number of uncon- tion is eliminated because no discernible tectonic formable surfaces and depositional hiatuses in the subsidence or uplift can be documented through- Jurassic–Cretaceous section of the Moscow depres- out the time of deposition, and only local and dis- sion represents additional evidence of stability. Due crete activity has occurred since deposition. The to very flat hypsometry and the lack of subsidence, stability and shallow-marine conditions of the cen- even minor sea level falls could have caused subma- tral Russian platform throughout most of the rine erosion or subaerial exposure, resulting in Jurassic and Cretaceous make this region useful for unconformities. In contrast, the more continuous detecting and quantifying eustatic variations. In deposition observed toward the southeast (lower addition, the Russian platform (Moscow depres- Volga River region and Caspian depression) indi- sion) is unique
Recommended publications
  • Sea Level and Global Ice Volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene
    Sea level and global ice volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene Kurt Lambecka,b,1, Hélène Roubya,b, Anthony Purcella, Yiying Sunc, and Malcolm Sambridgea aResearch School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia; bLaboratoire de Géologie de l’École Normale Supérieure, UMR 8538 du CNRS, 75231 Paris, France; and cDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected in 2009. Contributed by Kurt Lambeck, September 12, 2014 (sent for review July 1, 2014; reviewed by Edouard Bard, Jerry X. Mitrovica, and Peter U. Clark) The major cause of sea-level change during ice ages is the exchange for the Holocene for which the direct measures of past sea level are of water between ice and ocean and the planet’s dynamic response relatively abundant, for example, exhibit differences both in phase to the changing surface load. Inversion of ∼1,000 observations for and in noise characteristics between the two data [compare, for the past 35,000 y from localities far from former ice margins has example, the Holocene parts of oxygen isotope records from the provided new constraints on the fluctuation of ice volume in this Pacific (9) and from two Red Sea cores (10)]. interval. Key results are: (i) a rapid final fall in global sea level of Past sea level is measured with respect to its present position ∼40 m in <2,000 y at the onset of the glacial maximum ∼30,000 y and contains information on both land movement and changes in before present (30 ka BP); (ii) a slow fall to −134 m from 29 to 21 ka ocean volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Level and Climate Introduction
    Sea Level and Climate Introduction Global sea level and the Earth’s climate are closely linked. The Earth’s climate has warmed about 1°C (1.8°F) during the last 100 years. As the climate has warmed following the end of a recent cold period known as the “Little Ice Age” in the 19th century, sea level has been rising about 1 to 2 millimeters per year due to the reduction in volume of ice caps, ice fields, and mountain glaciers in addition to the thermal expansion of ocean water. If present trends continue, including an increase in global temperatures caused by increased greenhouse-gas emissions, many of the world’s mountain glaciers will disap- pear. For example, at the current rate of melting, most glaciers will be gone from Glacier National Park, Montana, by the middle of the next century (fig. 1). In Iceland, about 11 percent of the island is covered by glaciers (mostly ice caps). If warm- ing continues, Iceland’s glaciers will decrease by 40 percent by 2100 and virtually disappear by 2200. Most of the current global land ice mass is located in the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets (table 1). Complete melt- ing of these ice sheets could lead to a sea-level rise of about 80 meters, whereas melting of all other glaciers could lead to a Figure 1. Grinnell Glacier in Glacier National Park, Montana; sea-level rise of only one-half meter. photograph by Carl H. Key, USGS, in 1981. The glacier has been retreating rapidly since the early 1900’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Level: a Review of Present-Day and Recent-Past Changes and Variability
    Journal of Geodynamics 58 (2012) 96–109 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Geodynamics jo urnal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jog Review Sea level: A review of present-day and recent-past changes and variability ∗ Benoit Meyssignac , Anny Cazenave LEGOS-CNES, Toulouse, France a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: In this review article, we summarize observations of sea level variations, globally and regionally, during Received 12 December 2011 the 20th century and the last 2 decades. Over these periods, the global mean sea level rose at rates of Received in revised form 9 March 2012 1.7 mm/yr and 3.2 mm/yr respectively, as a result of both increase of ocean thermal expansion and land Accepted 10 March 2012 ice loss. The regional sea level variations, however, have been dominated by the thermal expansion factor Available online 19 March 2012 over the last decades even though other factors like ocean salinity or the solid Earth’s response to the last deglaciation can have played a role. We also present examples of total local sea level variations Keywords: that include the global mean rise, the regional variability and vertical crustal motions, focusing on the Sea level Altimetry tropical Pacific islands. Finally we address the future evolution of the global mean sea level under on- going warming climate and the associated regional variability. Expected impacts of future sea level rise Global mean sea level Regional sea level are briefly presented. Sea level reconstruction © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Level Rise
    A joint special edition on Sea Level Rise Image credit: US National Park Service CLIVAR Exchanges US CLIVAR Variations No. 74 • February 2018 Winter 2018 • Vol. 16, No. 1 ISSN No: 1026-0471 DOI: 10.5065/D6445K82 Table of Contents Sea Level Rise Guest editor: Highlights from the WCRP/IOC Sea Level Conference John Church July 2017, New York | Pg. 2 University of New South Wales, Australia A reconciled estimate of In June 2006, the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) convened its first sea level 20th century global mean workshop at the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) headquarters in sea level rise | Pg. 6 Paris. The workshop recognized the interdisciplinary nature of sea level change, and together with the conference statement and subsequent book, outlined progress, Evaluating climate model observational requirements, and challenges and helped stimulate further work. simulations of 20th century sea level rise | Pg. 13 Since then, there has been great progress across the full range of disciplines. This Changes in extreme is perhaps best exemplified in closing the sea level budget over multiple timescales sea levels | Pg. 20 (requiring progress in all elements of sea level science), developing the methodology for providing regional projections (see IPCC report chapter 13), and the improved ENSO teleconnections ability to simulate global and regional sea level change. Sea level change and the across the Pacific | Pg. 25 closely related Earth’s energy budget are now recognized as central elements in New York City’s evolving understanding climate change and its impacts. flood risk from hurricanes and sea level rise | Pg. 30 This joint publication between International and US CLIVAR begins with highlights of recent scientific progress on sea level rise research from the 2017 WCRP/IOC Sea Level Global distribution of Conference, and includes new estimates of historical change, evaluation of our ability to projected dynamic ocean sea level changes using simulate it, analysis of extreme events and surface waves, and examples of the impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Quaternary Sea-Level Changes: Records and Processes Craig S
    Basin Research (2008) 20, 161–162, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00365.x Pre-Quaternary sea-level changes: records and processes Craig S. Fulthorpe,n Gilbert Camoin,w Kenneth G. Millerz and Andre´ Droxler‰ nThe University of Texas at Austin Institute for Geophysics, John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences, J.J. Pickle Research Campus, Austin,TX wCEREGE,UMR 6635 CNRS, Aix-en-Provence cedex, France zDepartment of Geological Sciences,Wright Labs, Rutgers,The State University of NewJersey, Piscataway,NJ ‰Department of Earth Sciences, Rice University,Keith-Wiess Geological Labs, Houston,TX INTRODUCTION Droxler, Fulthorpe and Miller, Eds, 2006. Sea-level records, processes and modeling, A.S.F. Spec. Publ.). This Special Issue of Basin Research focuses on the long- term record of sea-level change from the Jurassic to the Miocene.The papers arose from a multidisciplinary inter- national symposium SEALAIX’06: Sea Level Changes: Records, Processes and Modeling held in Presqu’Ile de Giens, SPECIAL ISSUE France from 25 to 29 September 2006 and convened by Short-term global sea-level (eustatic) changes have the Gilbert Camoin, Andre¤Droxler, Craig Fulthorpe and most direct human impact, but the present and the recent Ken Miller.The symposium was sponsored by the Inter- past provide only a ‘snapshot’ of the constantly varying national Association of Sedimentologists (IAS), the climatic and tectonic states that have existed during Society for Sedimentary Geology (SEPM), TOTAL, the the history of the Earth. In order to understand the envir- Centre National de la Recherche Scienti¢que (CNRS), onmental and societal impact of potential future eustatic the Provence-Alpes-Co“ te d’Azur Region, and the French trends, it is vital to document how the Earth system has Association of Sedimentologists (Association des Se¤di- operated under di¡erent past conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic–Mesozoic Eustatic Changes and Mass Extinctions: New Insights from Event Interpretation
    life Article Paleozoic–Mesozoic Eustatic Changes and Mass Extinctions: New Insights from Event Interpretation Dmitry A. Ruban K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (the First Cossack University), Zemlyanoy Val Street 73, 109004 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] Received: 2 November 2020; Accepted: 13 November 2020; Published: 14 November 2020 Abstract: Recent eustatic reconstructions allow for reconsidering the relationships between the fifteen Paleozoic–Mesozoic mass extinctions (mid-Cambrian, end-Ordovician, Llandovery/Wenlock, Late Devonian, Devonian/Carboniferous, mid-Carboniferous, end-Guadalupian, end-Permian, two mid-Triassic, end-Triassic, Early Jurassic, Jurassic/Cretaceous, Late Cretaceous, and end-Cretaceous extinctions) and global sea-level changes. The relationships between eustatic rises/falls and period-long eustatic trends are examined. Many eustatic events at the mass extinction intervals were not anomalous. Nonetheless, the majority of the considered mass extinctions coincided with either interruptions or changes in the ongoing eustatic trends. It cannot be excluded that such interruptions and changes could have facilitated or even triggered biodiversity losses in the marine realm. Keywords: biotic crisis; global sea level; life evolution 1. Introduction During the whole Phanerozoic, mass extinctions stressed the marine biota many times. They triggered disappearances of numerous species, genera, families, and even high-order groups of marine organisms, and they were often associated with outstanding environmental catastrophes such as global events of anoxia and euxinia, unusual warming and planetary-scale glaciations, massive volcanism, and extraterrestrial impacts. Mass extinctions were highly complex events, with the intensity amplified by the interplay among atmosphere, oceans, geologic activity, and extraterrestrial influences. The relevant knowledge is huge, and it continues to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Global Sea Levels and Land Levels
    3 Recent global sea levels and land levels D.G. Aubrey and K.O. Emery Abstract Tide-gauge records from around the world ambiguously document the rise and fall of relative sea levels during the past century. Analyses of these records, non-uniformly distributed in time and space, reveal that land levels as well as ocean levels are changing, complicating the estimation of the eustatic component of sea level change. Because most tide gauges are concentrated in the Nonhero Hemisphere instead of the Southern Hemisphere (where most ocean area is located), tide-gauge data reflect major continental motions due to glacio-isostasy and neo-tectonism, which suppress and mask the signal from eustatic sea level change. Estimation of the magnitude of sea level change is important for many reasons, including the interpretation of possible effects of global climate change resulting from carbon dioxide and other trace gas loading of the atmosphere. Proper interpretation of past sea level changes is valuable for the calibration and evaluation of certain global climate, ocean and geophysical Earth models. This interpretation can be accomplished using tide-gauge records and other records of relative sea levels only if land level changes are sufficiently distinguished from actual sea level changes. Introduction Past and future climate changes drive various responses in the oceans. One such response is variation in sea levels as the oceans wann or cool, and as water is removed from or returned to the ocean basins and glaciers. During the past 15.000--18,000 years following the last glacial maximum, the Earth has experienced an average warming of about 4-5 ·c.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Antarctic Ice Sheet History and Prediction of the Future Sea-Level Changes Under Global Warming World
    IS-5 Observing Planet Earth and the Space from Antarctica Recent developments in the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition Ice Sheet Quaternary Antarctic Ice Sheet history and prediction of the future sea-level changes under global warming world Reconstruction of the Quaternary Antarctic Ice Infl uence of the changing of the Antarctic Ice Sheet history Sheet to the global environmental changes The Antarctic Ice Sheet is a gigantic mass of continental ice If the past volume of the Antarctic Ice Sheet could be reproduced accounting for around 90% of all glaciers on earth. Expansion from topographical and geological data and dating, it would be or contraction of the Antarctic Ice Sheet causes changes in possible to quantify the impact of increases and decreases in the global sea levels, marine environments and climate. It has been Antarctic Ice Sheet on past sea level changes. demonstrated, from continental and ocean bed topography and geology, that this Antarctic Ice Sheet has gone through various changes over the past three million years. Glacial topography of the Sør Rondane Mountains in Antarctica, showing past changes in the ice sheet. Elucidation of timing and cause of the changing of Antarctic Ice Sheet The timing and surrounding environment of past Antarctic Ice Sheet changing give us the key to predict the future changing of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Thickness of the Antarctic Ice Sheet removed since around 21,000 years ago (m) The melting volume of the Antarctic Ice Sheet between since around 21,000 years ago (Last Glacial Maximum) on the basis of geomorphological evidence. The reduction in elevation of the melted ice sheet is color-coded in units of meters.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Sea-Level Change and Early Human Societies in the Central and Eastern Mediterranean Basin : an Interdisciplinary Review
    This is a repository copy of Late Quaternary sea-level change and early human societies in the central and eastern Mediterranean Basin : an interdisciplinary review. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/119451/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Benjamin, Jonathan, Rovere, Alessio, Fontana, Alessandro et al. (14 more authors) (2017) Late Quaternary sea-level change and early human societies in the central and eastern Mediterranean Basin : an interdisciplinary review. Quaternary International. pp. 29-57. ISSN 1040-6182 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.06.025 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Author Accepted Manuscript Accepted for Publication in Quaternary International, 14/07/2017 Late Quaternary sea-level changes and early human societies in the central and eastern Mediterranean Basin: an interdisciplinary review Benjamin, J. (1), Rovere, A. (2,3), Fontana, A. (4), Furlani, S.(5), Vacchi, M.(6), Inglis, R. (7,8), Galili, E.(9), Antonioli, F.(10), Sivan, D.(11), Miko, S.(12), Mourtzas, N.(13), Felja, I.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Sea Level Changes Part One
    Credits: Phil Woodworth Past sea level changes Part One Svetlana Jevrejeva National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool, UK [email protected] Outline • Sea level changes from geological records • Instruments for the measurement of sea level • Tide gauge records, Data Centres, Specific data sets • Sea level observing systems (networks) • Interpretation of observations, synthesis of the data- global sea level rise, reconstructions • Sea level budget • Short conclusion Sea level changes from geological records http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/ctl/clisci100k.html Sea level changes during the Late Holocene AR5 IPCC, 2013. Chapter 5, Figure 5.17 How unusual is the current sea level rate of change? AR5 IPCC, 2013. Chapter 5, FAQ5.2 Global sea level rise since 1700 Figure 13.27, AR5 IPCC ( 2013) Sea Level Expansion Glaciers Greenland Antarctica Land Water Climate Change 1712 – Steam engine by Thomas Newcomen (industrial use of coal) 1938 - Using records from 147 weather stations around the world, British engineer Guy Callendar shows that temperatures had risen over the previous century, link to the CO2 concentrations, suggesting that increase in CO2 caused the warming 1972 - First UN environment conference (chemical pollution, atomic bomb testing - no climate change), in Stockholm 1975 - US scientist Wallace Broecker puts the term "global warming" into the public domain in the title of a scientific paper 12 Dec 2015 – Paris Agreement on climate change (195 nations) Why do we make sea level measurements What do we measure? Coastal protection (extreme sea levels) Navigation (tide /shallow waters) Vertical land movement Instruments for the Measurement of Sea Level Automatic tide gauge at Port Protection, Prince of www.bidstonobservatory.org.uk/tide-gauges/ Wales Island, Alaska, 1915.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multimillennial Sea-Level Commitment of Global Warming
    The multimillennial sea-level commitment of SEE COMMENTARY global warming Anders Levermanna,b,1, Peter U. Clarkc, Ben Marzeiond, Glenn A. Milnee, David Pollardf, Valentina Radicg, and Alexander Robinsonh,i aPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany; bInstitute of Physics, Potsdam University, 14476 Potsdam, Germany; cCollege of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331; dCenter for Climate and Cryosphere, Institute for Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; eDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5; fEarth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; gUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4; hUniversidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain; and iInstituto de Geociencias, Universidad Complutense de Madrid-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28040 Madrid, Spain Edited by John C. Moore, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing, China, and accepted by the Editorial Board June 13, 2013 (received for review November 7, 2012) Global mean sea level has been steadily rising over the last level commitment. Here we describe the models used and the century, is projected to increase by the end of this century, and resulting estimates of long-term sea-level rise from each com- will continue to rise beyond the year 2100 unless the current ponent of the Earth system. We combine simulations from global mean temperature trend is reversed. Inertia in the climate process-based physical models for the four main components and global carbon system, however, causes the global mean that contribute to sea-level changes to give a robust estimate of temperature to decline slowly even after greenhouse gas emis- the sea-level commitment on multimillennial time scales up to sions have ceased, raising the question of how much sea-level a global mean temperature increase of 4 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sea-Level Fingerprints of Ice-Sheet Collapse During Interglacial Periods
    Quaternary Science Reviews 87 (2014) 60e69 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev The sea-level fingerprints of ice-sheet collapse during interglacial periods Carling Hay a,*, Jerry X. Mitrovica a, Natalya Gomez a, Jessica R. Creveling b, Jacqueline Austermann a, Robert E. Kopp c a Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, USA b Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, USA c Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences and Rutgers Energy Institute, Rutgers University, USA article info abstract Article history: Studies of sea level during previous interglacials provide insight into the stability of polar ice sheets in Received 31 July 2013 the face of global climate change. Commonly, these studies correct ancient sea-level highstands for the Received in revised form contaminating effect of isostatic adjustment associated with past ice age cycles, and interpret the re- 18 December 2013 siduals as being equivalent to the peak eustatic sea level associated with excess melting, relative to Accepted 20 December 2013 present day, of ancient polar ice sheets. However, the collapse of polar ice sheets produces a distinct Available online geometry, or fingerprint, of sea-level change, which must be accounted for to accurately infer peak eustatic sea level from site-specific residual highstands. To explore this issue, we compute fingerprints Keywords: Interglacials associated with the collapse of the Greenland Ice Sheet, West Antarctic Ice Sheet, and marine sectors of Sea level the East Antarctic Ice Sheet in order to isolate regions that would have been subject to greater-than- Fingerprinting eustatic sea-level change for all three cases.
    [Show full text]