Minesing Reeds the Friends of Minesing Wetlands Newsletter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Short History of Chief Island 1856-2007 As Prepared by Leclair
A SHORT HISTORY OF CHIEF ISLAND, 1856-2007 Abstract A brief examination of Chippewas of Rama First Nation’s assertion to title Prepared for Chippewas of Rama First Nation by Leclair Historical Research, June 2021 PRIVILEDGED AND CONFIDENTIAL Introduction In late May 2021 Cathy Edney, Communications Manager, Rama First Nation contacted Leclair Historical Research asking for a primer on the status of Chief Island, Rama Township. Rama First Nation asserts that this island is part of the traditional territory of the Chippewas of Lake Huron and Simcoe, and more specifically, that of Rama First Nation. A search of the historical abstract books for Ramara Township housed at Simcoe County’s Land Registry Office # 51 was also undertaken as a precaution against the question of a title conflict. 1 No cloud on the title to the island was found. In sum, Chief Island has never been covered by treaty and remains Indigenous territory. It has a special significance for Rama First Nation as it has been used as a burial ground for its people for centuries. It is also the final resting place of those ancient ancestors whose care has been entrusted to Rama First Nation. Through a Joint Band Council Resolution passed among the Chippewas of Rama, Beausoleil Island and Georgina Island in 1964, and an accompanying federal Ministerial Order, Chief Island has been expressly named as part of the reserve lands of the Chippewas of Rama First Nation. 1 The historical land abstract books are available online through the government of Ontario’s ONLAND, land registry access. https://www.onland.ca/ui/25/books/search. -
Consultation and Accommodation Protocol for Rama First Nation
Consultation and Accommodation Protocol for Rama First Nation Table of Contents Preliminary Matters ................................................................................................................................. 4 Respecting First Nation Lands: ....................................................................................... 4 Notice: ............................................................................................................................... 4 Name and Adoption of this Protocol: ............................................................................ 4 Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 5 PART I: ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Preamble: ......................................................................................................... 6 2. Purpose: ............................................................................................................ 6 3. Aboriginal and Treaty Rights: ........................................................................ 6 4. Private Organizations and the Duty to Consult: .......................................... 7 5. Guiding Principles for Meaningful Consultation: .......................................... 7 6. Definitions: ...................................................................................................... -
Indigenous Collaborative Programming Report
Navigating the Road Ahead: Indigenous Collaborative Programming Land Acknowledgement: INDIGENOUS COLLABORATIVE WHAT DOES AN INDIGENOUS PROGRAMMING COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM We respectfully acknowledge that the 4Directions of Conversation Consulting Inc. is located within the Treaty 20 Michi Saagiig territory and in the traditional territory of the Michi Saagiig and We are all treaty people, and as such, we all LOOK LIKE? Chippewa First Nations, collectively known as the Williams Treaties First Nations, which include Curve have a role to play in upholding these treaties. Lake, Hiawatha, Alderville, Scugog Island, Rama, Beausoleil, and Georgina Island First Nations. Indigenous peoples have unique and complex To honour treaties is to honour the relationships with land that extends beyond using Authorship: relationships that have come before us and land for their personal or community needs or as Gary L.J Pritchard ~ Giniw (Golden Eagle) is a Conservation Ecologist and Indigenous Engagement/ the ones yet to come. their life-support system. Indigenous relationships Placemaking Specialist from Curve Lake First Nation, Ontario. Gary has had the privilege to work with land include cultural, spiritual, economic, on behalf of Indigenous peoples throughout Ontario and Canada. He has travelled and worked in As we strive towards reconciliation, it is stewardship, kinship, governance and rights-based almost 300 Indigenous communities throughout Canada and the northern United States. more important than ever to acknowledge aspects. Ensuring that these relationships can that any project, regardless of size or intent continue is critical to the future and wellbeing of Gary loves to connect and educate people through nature. He believes that if individuals, especially may inadvertently bring harm to Indigenous Indigenous peoples. -
Media Release
Media Release COLDWATER – NARROWS LAND CLAIM SETTLEMENT Rama First Nation -- December 12, 2012 -- The Chippewa Tri-Council First Nations and Nawash Unceded First Nation have received confirmation that the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC), the Hon. John Duncan, has signed the Coldwater- Narrows Land Claim Settlement Agreement, concluding this long outstanding claim. The four First Nation communities are now in the process of receiving full compensation and implementing trust agreements established by their membership as part of a ratification process which took place earlier in the year. This brings to an end the largest specific land claim in Canadian history. The Coldwater-Narrows Land Claim began more than 30 years ago when research into the claim began. In 1991, the claim was formally filed with the federal government. While Canada initially rejected the claim in 1996, it was eventually accepted in 2002. Ten years of hard negotiations led to this historic outcome. The Chippewa Tri-Council First Nations, which include the Chippewas of Rama First Nation, the Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation and Beausoleil First Nation, all voted to ratify the Settlement Agreement on April 14th, 2012. The Chippewas of Nawash Unceded First Nation ratified their agreement on July 7th, 2012. A formal signing ceremony with the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs is tentatively planned for the new year. Chief Sharon Stinson Henry of Rama First Nation has been a part of the negotiating table since the claim was accepted in August of 2002. She said that the conclusion of the claim is one that has long been a part of her work on behalf of her community. -
Navigating the Swamp: Lessons on Wetland Offsetting for Ontario
NAVIGATING THE SWAMP Lessons on wetland offsetting for Ontario Ontarioa Nature’s GreenwayNavigating Guide the Series Swamp: Lessons on wetland offsetting for Ontario Navigating the Swamp: Lessons on Wetland Offsetting for Ontario July 2017 David W. Poulton, M.A., LL.M, and Anne Bell, Ph.D. Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the following people who provided valuable information and insights: Suzanne Armstrong, Shari Clare, Royal Gardner, Arlene Kwasniak, Larry McDermott, Angus Norman, Joanna Salsberg and Joshua Wise. Further, staff in government agencies and environmental groups across Canada were generous with their time, explaining the various offset systems across Canada. For that we thank Kamal Abdel-Razek, Craig Bishop, Lyle Gawalko, Thorsten Hebben, Peter Joyce, Anish Neupane and Christie Ward. Note, however, that the views presented in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the aforementioned individuals. Of course, the authors take responsibility for any errors inadvertently made in conveying the information provided by the people mentioned above. This report was made possible through the generous support of The McLean Foundation. Review: Sarah Hedges, Ron Corkum Copy editor: Sarah Weber Design: Lauren McVittie Cover photos: (top) Joe Crowley, (left to right) Peter Ferguson, Peter Ferguson, Missy Mandel, Scott Gillingwater This guide can be downloaded free of charge from the Ontario Nature website, ontarionature.org/publications. Copyright © 2017: Ontario Nature Navigating the Swamp: Lessons on wetland offsetting for Ontario Executive Summary The Government of Ontario is proposing to develop a wetland offsetting policy to enable compensation for the negative impacts of development through the restoration or creation of new wetlands. -
© Massimo Narini, 2016
An investigation of land-use impacts on water quality and algal communities in the Nottawasaga River and low-order streams of the Nottawasaga Valley Watershed by Massimo Narini A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In The Faculty of Science Applied Bioscience University of Ontario Institute of Technology July 2016 © Massimo Narini, 2016 Abstract The Nottawasaga Valley Watershed (NVW) is a large catchment south of Georgian Bay that drains a primarily agricultural region including one of the largest wetland complexes in Southern Ontario, the Minesing Wetlands (MW). The MW are designated both provincially and internationally significant due to its large area and high biological diversity. Agricultural practices have been a large influence on the Nottawasaga River ecosystem throughout history, but intensification of agricultural demands have put stress on surface water quality across the river network. In order to understand how ecosystem health may be impacted from current agricultural land-use, baseline water quality and phytoplankton data were collected monthly (June-September 2014) over 15 sites across the Nottawasaga River continuum. In addition, first- and second-order streams directly influenced by agricultural land-use runoff were assessed for impacts to surface water quality and periphyton biomass across the NVW. Water quality across the Nottawasaga River exhibited large amounts of variation, with Innisfil Creek having a disproportional influence on suspended sediment related impacts to water quality. Agricultural and urban land-use were positively correlated with many water quality parameters, whereas natural land-use features (i.e. forest, water and wetland land-use) were negatively correlated with many water quality parameters. -
SMRCP Aboriginal Cancer Plan
1 This plan was developed in collaboration with our community partners. Special thanks to the Aboriginal Health Circle for their valuable input and ongoing partnership which is essential to the success of this work. 2 Aboriginal Communities in the North Simcoe Muskoka Region Regional Index First Nations Communities 11. Beausoleil First Nation 24. Chippewas of Rama First Nation 74. Moose Deer Point First Nation 121. Wahta Mohawks Metis Nation of Ontario Community Councils 5. Georgian Bay Métis Council 13. Moon River Métis Council 3 The First Nation, Métis and Inuit (FNMI) population of the North Simcoe Muskoka (NSM) region is approximately 20,000, accounting for approximately 6% of Ontario’s Indigenous inhabitants. The region is home to 4 First Nations communities and 2 Métis Community Councils: Moose Deer Point First Nation, Beausoleil First Nation and Chippewas of Rama (served by the Union of Ontario Indians), Wahta Mohawks (served by the Association of Iroquois and Allied Indians), the Georgian Bay Métis Council, and Moon River Métis Council. It should be noted here that Midland and Innisfil consecutively have the 1st and 2nd largest Métis populations in Ontario. In addition to these communities, NSM is home to a large urban Aboriginal population. There are now more Aboriginal people living in urban centers than there are living in Aboriginal territories, communities on reserves and Métis settlements. It is estimated that 65% of the Indigenous population of Simcoe Muskoka constitute a permanent presence throughout the region. This percentage of the Indigenous community is primarily serviced by Native Women’s Groups, Native Friendship Centre's and additional community based organizations listed on page 7 of this document. -
Anishinabek-PS-Annual-Report-2020
ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ANISHINABEK POLICE SERVICE Oo’deh’nah’wi…nongohm, waabung, maamawi! (Community…today, tomorrow, together!) TABLE OF CONTENTS Mission Statement 4 Organizational Charts 5 Map of APS Detachments 7 Chairperson Report 8 Chief of Police Report 9 Inspector Reports - North, Central, South 11 Major Crime - Investigative Support Unit 21 Recruitment 22 Professional Standards 23 Corporate Services 24 Financial 25 Financial Statements 26 Human Resources 29 Use of Force 31 Statistics 32 Information Technology 34 Training & Equipment 35 MISSION STATEMENT APS provides effective, efficient, proud, trustworthy and accountable service to ensure Anishinabek residents and visitors are safe and healthy while respecting traditional cultural values including the protection of inherent rights and freedoms on our traditional territory. VISION STATEMENT Safe and healthy Anishinabek communities. GOALS Foster healthy, safe and strong communities. Provide a strong, healthy, effective, efficient, proud and accountable organization. Clarify APS roles and responsibilities regarding First Nation jurisdiction for law enforcement. 4 APS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE - BOARD STRUCTURE ANISHINABEK POLICE SERVICE POLICE COUNCIL POLICE GOVERNING AUTHORITY POLICE GOVERNING Garden River First Nation AUTHORITY COMMITEES Curve Lake First Nation Sagamok Anishnawbek First Nation Discipline Commitee Fort William First Nation Operations Commitee POLICE CHIEF Biigtigong Nishnaabeg Finance Commitee Netmizaaggaming Nishnaabeg Cultural Commitee Biinjitiwaabik Zaaging Anishinaabek -
Minesing Wetlands Natural Area Conservation Plan Executive Summary Approved in 2017
Minesing Wetlands Natural Area Conservation Plan Executive Summary Approved in 2017 Vision Statement The Minesing Wetlands is one of the largest wetland systems in southern Ontario and supports a diversity of rare species and wetland habitats including extensive marshes, fens, and treed swamps. Conservation activities focus on strategic securement of remaining private land parcels, and restoration activities in a variety of habitats to retain the full complement of ecological functions and structures. Conservation partners, compatible recreational users, researchers and community members are cooperatively engaged in the long-term conservation, promotion, and understanding of this Ramsar Wetland of International Importance. Project Team Name Organization Role Phone Email 519-826-0068 x.5222 kristyn.ferguson@ Kristyn Nature Conservancy natureconservancy.c Ferguson of Canada Plan lead a Nature Conservancy Team Laura Robson of Canada member Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Team Byron Wesson Authority member Nottawasaga Valley Dave Conservation Team Featherstone Authority member Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Team Kyra Howes Authority member Nature Conservancy Team Claire Elliott of Canada member Mhairi Nature Conservancy Team McFarlane of Canada member Doug van Nature Conservancy Project Hemessen of Canada advisor Sean Ducks Unlimited Project Rootham Canada advisor Naomi Friends of Minesing Project Saunders Wetlands advisor Danny Friends of Minesing Project Mainville Wetlands advisor Project Chris Evans Nature Barrie advisor Nottawasaga Valley -
Recovery Strategy for the Hine's Emerald
Photo: C.G. Evans Hine’s Emerald (Somatochlora hineana) in Ontario Ontario Recovery Strategy Series Recovery strategy prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 Ministry of Natural Resources About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. What is recovery? What’s next? Recovery of species at risk is the process by which the Nine months after the completion of a recovery strategy decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated a government response statement will be published species is arrested or reversed, and threats are which summarizes the actions that the Government of removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a Ontario intends to take in response to the strategy. species’ persistence in the wild. The implementation of recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and What is a recovery strategy? conservationists. Under the ESA a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to For more information achieve recovery of a species. A recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs and the threats to the To learn more about species at risk recovery in Ontario, survival and recovery of the species. It also makes please visit the Ministry of Natural Resources Species at recommendations on the objectives for protection and Risk webpage at: www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk recovery, the approaches to achieve those objectives, and the area that should be considered in the development of a habitat regulation. -
Beausoleil First Nation Land Code If You've Been Keeping up with The
Beausoleil First Nation Land Code If you’ve been keeping up with the information distributed through the newsletters you will know that we, Beausoleil First Nation Members will be voting once again on the BFN Land Code. In May, of 2015 we voted on the draft Beausoleil First Nation Land Code. It was a successful vote in terms of participation. At that time there were 1768 eligible voters and 487 Members voted. 417 Members voted YES – that’s an 84% approval rate, but we needed at least 443 yes votes. Background: Framework Agreement The Framework Agreement on First Nation Land Management is an initiative developed by 14 First Nations to opt out of the land management sections within the Indian Act and take over the responsibility for the management and control of their reserve lands and resources. The Framework Agreement sets out the principle components of this new land management process. The Framework Agreement is not a treaty and it does not affect treaty rights of other constitutional rights of the First Nations. Government to government agreement that was sign in 1996 First Nation driven, originally 14 First Nations First real recognition of inherent right to manage lands and resources There are now 128 signatories to the Framework Agreement 60 ratified their Land Code & Individual Agreement (3 have moved on to Self Government) 11 Ontario First Nations have now ratified and more are working towards ratifying First Nations Land Management Act Canada enacted Bill C-49, the First Nations Lands Management Act, as a part of its obligation to ratify the Framework Agreement. -
Our Cause Worked Together to Bring a Vision to Life of a Place Celebrating Our Collective Histories… a Place to Forge Our Future Together
Schedule 1 Committee of the Whole CCW 2019-245 Working Together and Helping One Another For over 10 years, the Friends of Wiidookdaadiwin have Our Cause worked together to bring a vision to life of a place celebrating our collective histories… a place to forge our future together. Remember We present to you an opportunity to join us in working together and helping one another. Our work represents both Our Past. a history and a hope of different cultures embracing new challenges, new opportunities and new understandings. Too much of our history has included systemic racism, cultural Celebrate divides, and polarized opinions created by misinformation about that history. We seek to create possibilities in a place Our Present. for conversations, asking questions, and learning. We offer you an opportunity to join us in bringing that vison Build to life through a place and through an icon. The icon is a gift that celebrates our collective history and forges a new path Our Future. forward for a brighter future. The place is Wiidookdaadiwin. Schedule 1 Committee of the Whole CCW 2019-245 Remember Our Past. Celebrate Our Present. Build Our Future. From the height of the site, as you focus on the Collingwood Grain elevators at the centre point on the horizon, shift your gaze to the right and you will see the outline of Georgian Bay, part of the largest body of freshwater in the world. Continuing to the right, the Copeland Forest lies at the north western toe of the Oro Moraine, from which the waters carry into the Coldwater River, the Sturgeon River and Willow Creek.