Jerusalem Chronology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sur Bahir & Umm Tuba Town Profile
Sur Bahir & Umm Tuba Town Profile Prepared by The Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Funded by Spanish Cooperation 2012 Palestinian Localities Study Jerusalem Governorate Acknowledgments ARIJ hereby expresses its deep gratitude to the Spanish agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID) for their funding of this project. ARIJ is grateful to the Palestinian officials in the ministries, municipalities, joint services councils, village committees and councils, and the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) for their assistance and cooperation with the project team members during the data collection process. ARIJ also thanks all the staff who worked throughout the past couple of years towards the accomplishment of this work. 1 Palestinian Localities Study Jerusalem Governorate Background This report is part of a series of booklets, which contain compiled information about each city, village, and town in the Jerusalem Governorate. These booklets came as a result of a comprehensive study of all villages in Jerusalem Governorate, which aims at depicting the overall living conditions in the governorate and presenting developmental plans to assist in developing the livelihood of the population in the area. It was accomplished through the "Village Profiles and Needs Assessment;" the project funded by the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID). The "Village Profiles and Needs Assessment" was designed to study, investigate, analyze and document the socio-economic conditions and the needed programs and activities to mitigate the impact of the current unsecure political, economic and social conditions in the Jerusalem Governorate. The project's objectives are to survey, analyze, and document the available natural, human, socioeconomic and environmental resources, and the existing limitations and needs assessment for the development of the rural and marginalized areas in the Jerusalem Governorate. -
An Examination of Israeli Municipal Policy in East Jerusalem Ardi Imseis
American University International Law Review Volume 15 | Issue 5 Article 2 2000 Facts on the Ground: An Examination of Israeli Municipal Policy in East Jerusalem Ardi Imseis Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Imseis, Ardi. "Facts on the Ground: An Examination of Israeli Municipal Policy in East Jerusalem." American University International Law Review 15, no. 5 (2000): 1039-1069. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTS ON THE GROUND: AN EXAMINATION OF ISRAELI MUNICIPAL POLICY IN EAST JERUSALEM ARDI IMSEIS* INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1040 I. BACKGROUND ........................................... 1043 A. ISRAELI LAW, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EAST JERUSALEM SINCE 1967 ................................. 1043 B. ISRAELI MUNICIPAL POLICY IN EAST JERUSALEM ......... 1047 II. FACTS ON THE GROUND: ISRAELI MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY IN EAST JERUSALEM ........................ 1049 A. EXPROPRIATION OF PALESTINIAN LAND .................. 1050 B. THE IMPOSITION OF JEWISH SETTLEMENTS ............... 1052 C. ZONING PALESTINIAN LANDS AS "GREEN AREAS"..... -
DISPLACED in THEIR OWN CITY the Impact of Israeli Policy in East Jerusalem on the Palestinian Neighborhoods of the City Beyond the Separation Barrier June 2015
DISPLACED IN THEIR OWN CITY THE IMPACT OF ISRAELI POLICY IN EAST JERUSALEM ON THE PALESTINIAN NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE CITY BEYOND THE SEPARATION BARRIER JUNE 2015 27 King George St., P.O. Box 2239, Jerusalem 94581 Telephone: 972-2-6222858 | Fax: 972-2-6233696 www.ir-amim.org.il | [email protected] DISPLACED IN THEIR OWN CITY THE IMPACT OF ISRAELI POLICY IN EAST JERUSALEM ON THE PALESTINIAN NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE CITY BEYOND THE SEPARATION BARRIER JUNE 2015 Written by: Ehud Tagari and Yudith Oppenheimer Research: Eyal Hareuveni and Aviv Tatarsky Hebrew editing: Lea Klibanoff Ron English translation: Shaul Vardi English editing: Betty Herschman Photography: Ahmad Sub Laban Thanks to: Atty. Oshrat Maimon, Atty. Nisreen Alyan of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), Christoph von Toggenburg of the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), Roni Ben Efrat and Erez Wagner of WAC-MAAN, the Workers Advice Center, Lior Volinz of Amsterdam University, Atty. Elias Khoury, and Eetta Prince-Gibson. This publication was produced by Ir Amim (“City of Nations”) in the framework of a joint project with the Workers Advice Center WAC-MAAN aimed at strengthening the socio-economic rights of East Jerusalem residents. We thank the European Union, the Royal Norwegian Embassy in Israel, and The Moriah Fund for their support. The content of this publication is the responsibility of Ir Amim alone. taBLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 Chapter One: Israeli Policy in East Jerusalem since 1967 8 A. Annexation and Confiscation . 8 B. Ensuring a Jewish Majority . 9 C. Non-Registration of Land. 10 D. -
The Jerusalem Foundation Annual Report 2014
The Jerusalem Foundation Annual Report 2014 CULTURE COEXISTENCE COMMUNITY Table of Contents 4 About the Jerusalem Foundation Any questions or concerns about the Annual Report should be directed to Yael Ehrenpreis Meyer, [email protected] 6 Vision and Mission Information in this report is correct as of May 1, 2015. The 11 Culture exchange rate utilized for this report is 3.58 NIS to $1. 25 Community Photos: Jerusalem Foundation staff, Vadim Mikhailov, Sasson Tiram 43 Coexistence Design: Abstract – Youval Hefetz 58 Scholarships and Awards Cover Photo: Center of the World located in Sharp Square, 60 Financial Data 2014 Jerusalem. Commissioned in memory of Eran Laor and supported by Helene Stone-Laor z”l and family. 62 Donors Sculpture: David Breuer-Weil Photo by: Vadim Mikhailov 67 Legacies and Estates 69 Leadership Israel 71 Leadership Worldwide From the Director-General Dear Friends, I am pleased to present you with the Jerusalem Foundation Annual Report for 2014, a year in which nearly $35 million in pledges and grants were raised from our friends and partners the world over, funds that were utilized for programs and projects that served to benefit the city of Jerusalem. Jerusalem is both Israel’s capital city and its most populous, with a total of over 815,000 residents this year – meaning that 1 in every 10 of the country’s residents lives in Jerusalem. Jerusalem is characterized as well by its distinctive cultural and political history and a religious, ethnic and socioeconomic diversity that together weave the intricate fabric of this complex city. This unique character of the City of Jerusalem is reflected in the nearly 50-year mandate of the Jerusalem Foundation. -
Jerusalem Chronology
PASSIA: Jerusalem Chronology 1995 Jan. 2: Israeli forces close off the Ambassador Hotel area in Sheikh Jarrah to prevent a press conference protesting Israel's settlement policy. Jan. 6: Jerusalem Post quotes Rina Zamir of the Housing Ministry’s Jerusalem Dept. saying that construction of 10,000 housing units in Jerusalem settlements begins soon. Jan. 10: Palestinians and Israelis demonstrate in solidarity with the Jahalin bedouins and in protest of Ma'ale Adumim expansion. Jan. 11: On a visit of the Old City, Rabin stresses that he does not intend to share the city, nor to end control of East Jerusalem or to give in to Palestinian demands to establish their capital in East Jerusalem. Jan. 13: Jerusalem Link holds a against settlements and the closure demonstration at Dahiet checkpoint Jan. 15: Republican speaker of the US House of Representatives Newt Gingrich tells Israeli TV that Israel has a right to choose its own capital and that he favours moving the US embassy to Jerusalem. - Israeli security forces raid Al-Quds press office in East Jerusalem. Jan. 15-17: The Jerusalem Committee of the Islamic Conference Organization condemns Israel’s 'Jerusalem Law' against Palestinian activity in the city and votes to create an agency to defend Palestinian rights and Islamic heritage in the city. Jan. 16: A group of Jewish settlers attempts to enter Al-Aqsa Mosque but is prevented by Israeli police. - Israeli forces destroy the house of Abdul Rama in Beit Hanina which laid in the way of the new Road 1. Jan. 18: Israeli bulldozers destroy Nadir Shalabi’s house in A-Tur. -
ABU TOR ABSTRACT Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research Projects – No
ABU TOR ABSTRACT Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research projects – No. 474 The Arab Neighborhoods in East Jerusalem Infrastructure Research and Evaluation Abu Tor Ya'ara Issar | Jerusalem, 2017 Research Team Yitzhak Reiter, Israel Kimhi, Ya'ara Issar, Ahmad Asmar, Murad Natsheh, Galit Raz-Dror Photographs Ya'ara Issar, Israel Kimhi Maps Dafna Shemer, Israel Kimhi Additional Publications in this Series 1. Sur Baher and Umm Tuba The Arab Neighborhoods in East Jerusalem 2. Beit Hanina Infrastructure Research and Evaluation 3. A-Tur 4. Wadi Al-Joz 5. Isawiya 6. Jabel Al-Mukaber ABU TOR © Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research, 2017 | Hey Elyachar House 20 Radak Street, Jerusalem 9218604 jerusaleminstitute.org.il | [email protected] YA'ARA ISSAR 50 JERUSALEM INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH \\\ ABU TOR JERUSALEM INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH \\\ ABU TOR 49 ABU TOR - ABSTRACT This abstract is part of a series of research papers prepared Several central Planning and Construction Abu Tor is surrounded on all sides by by the Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research about the Arab problems arose either built-up areas or national and municipal parks, within which neighborhoods in East Jerusalem. The purpose of this study is to during the survey of construction is not permitted. The low percentage of construction sketch a social profile, as well as a profile of the infrastructure in approved for residential structures has been used up. There is an the neighborhoods in a variety of areas, so as to promote active, the neighborhood urgent need for the preparation of a new and updated master plan, knowledge-based steps, toward the improvement of the quality which will allow for construction that will meet the needs created by of life of the Arab residents of East Jerusalem. -
Request for Proposal – RFP Safeguarding Palestinians Living in East Jerusalem Lives and Their Livelihoods SPLJ-SER-001
Request for Proposal – RFP Safeguarding Palestinians living in East Jerusalem lives and their livelihoods SPLJ-SER-001 1. MA’AN Development Center MA’AN Development Center is an independent Palestinian development and training institution established in January 1989 and registered as a non-profit organization. The main office is located in Ramallah with branch offices in Gaza, and Jenin. MA’AN's work is informed by the necessity of creating independent, self-reliant initiatives that lead to the development of human resources for sustainable development, which incorporate values of self-sufficiency and self-empowerment. For more information about MA’AN, please refer to our homepage:www.maan-ctr.org 2. Project profile Project name Safeguarding Palestinians Living in East Jerusalem lives and their livelihoods.The project known as Tadafor. Project strategic objective Enhance economic empowerment and increase prosperity for Businesses and projects affected by COVID-19 in East Jerusalem. Target Areas East Jerusalem, Beit Hanina, Essawiyeh, Ras Al Amod, Old city, Shu’fat, Refugee camp, Anata, Shu’fat, Sur Baher, Wadi Al Joz, Silwan, Al-Thury, Jabal Al Mukaber, Sur Baher, AL Ram, Abu Dies, Izzarieh, Sawahreh, Shiekh Sa’d, Al Tor, Hizma, Jaba’, Qalandia, Kufur Aqab, Biet Safafa. Target beneficiaries Micro Businesses, Entrepreneurs (startups), Freelancers Trainings Implementation April 25, 2021 – March31, 2022 time frame: 3. Project background Tadafor Project: funded by the European Union and implemented by the Palestinian Vision Organization, in cooperation with MA’AN Development Center, the Palestinian Medical Relief Society, and the Treatment and Rehabilitation center of Victims of Torture. The project aims to contribute to contain pandemic and mitigate its impact on East Jerusalem community members to withstand chocks and mitigate protection threats while preserving character of the city. -
Al-Quds and Yerushalayim: Two Names for Two Cities
Al-Quds and Yerushalayim: Two Names for Two Cities January-February 1999 Jerome M. Segal It was only in the middle of the 19th century that the residents of Jerusalem began to live outside the historic walled city. For Jews that walled city was Yerushalayim, for Arabs it was Al-Quds - one city, with two different names. The Old City constitutes less than one percent of present-day Jerusalem, yet for both Israelis and Palestinians it remains the very heart of Jerusalem. Of Jerusalem, Israeli officials tend to say, "There are some issues on which we will never reach agreement with the Palestinians." Perhaps this is true of the Old City, but what about the other 99 percent of Jerusalem? Might it not be possible to dramatically transform the Jerusalem question by reaching agreement on the 99 percent and then finding a modus vivendi for the unresolved one percent? The plausibility of the familiar assertion, that it is impossible to resolve the Jerusalem question, rests on treating the city as a single aggregate - as though there were one unified, coherent entity that is Jerusalem. Yet Jerusalem is anything but a coherent whole. Residentially it is starkly segregated. Virtually no Palestinians live in West Jerusalem. With the exception of the Old City, almost all Israelis living in East Jerusalem live in physically distinct neighborhoods, often appearing as fortress communities surrounded by undeveloped land. THE EASTERN ENLARGEMENT What we today call "East Jerusalem" is not merely the eastern part of the city that Israelis were cut-off from when the city was divided between 1949 and 1967. -
The Ongoing Economic Deterioration in East Jerusalem and the Current Wave of Terror
A Troubling Correlation: The Ongoing Economic Deterioration in East Jerusalem and the Current Wave of Terror Amit Efrati Background “What do I care about the Temple Mount?” sighs Ali Awasat, an East Jerusalem resident. “As far as I’m concerned, let the Jews take it. They’re all liars. What’s important to me is what I have in my pocket. People in the east of the city don’t have work, don’t have proper salaries. This is the problem, and this is what leads to despair.”1 Although Awasat’s attitude is not typical of the inflammatory Islamic-nationalistic discourse highlighted on the social networks and in Palestinian media, it reflects the deep roots of the current wave of terror, which stems mainly from ongoing despair in a gloomy economic reality, and the sense among Palestinian youth that all paths to advancement are blocked. Nevertheless, the economic aspects of the current wave of terror are hardly mentioned at all in the public discourse in Israel, which tends to characterize the violence as a dark and ISIS-like Islamic religious war whose participants are a Palestinian “Shabaab” that sanctifies death and sees the world from a different perspective.2 In fact, however, an examination of those committing the recent terror attacks in Israel reveals a profile that is secular, young, poorly educated, and lacking any organizational affiliation. The economic aspects of the current terror wave are reflected in a survey conducted in March 2016 among Palestinian youth from the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, which indicated that the highest percentage (33.8 percent) believe that the wave of terror that broke out in Amit Efrati holds an M.A. -
B'tselem and Hamoked Report: “The Quiet Deportation: Revocation Of
HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual B'Tselem - The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories THE QUIET DEPORTATION REVOCATION OF RESIDENCY OF EAST JERUSALEM PALESTINIANS A Joint Report, April 1997 Written by Yael Stein Fieldwork: Fuad Abu-Hamed, Najib Abu-Rokaya, Mazen Dandis Translation: Zvi Shulman Graphic design: Dina Sher B'Tselem and HaMoked thank the following attorneys and organizations for their help in preparing this report: Usama Halabi Andre Rosenthal Leah Tsemel Jerusalem Center for Women Physicians for Human Rights B'Tselem would also like to thank Alex Malouf for editing the English Internet version of the report. 2 INTRODUCTION During the past eighteen months, following implementation of Israel's new policy on residency, hundreds, if not thousands, of Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem have lost their right to live in the city. Tens of thousands more are also liable to lose this right, and live in uncertainty about their future. Since the annexation of East Jerusalem by Israel in 1967, all Israeli governments have made great efforts to reduce significantly the number of Palestinians residing in East Jerusalem. These efforts include harsh restrictions on Palestinian construction in the eastern part of the city, a rigid policy on family unification, and minimal investment in infrastructure, and are part of a policy to strengthen Israeli sovereignty in East Jerusalem so that it cannot be challenged in the future. Since the beginning of 1996, Israel has been using an additional method to attain this goal. The method is implemented by the Interior Ministry and deals with the residency status of East Jerusalem's Palestinian residents. -
Near East University Docs
NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES ARCHITECTURE AND POLITICS: The Use of Architecture as a Language of War in The Case of Jerusalem City Rami Mushasha Master Thesis Department of Architecture Nicosia-2008 2 Rami Mushasha: Architecture and Politics Architecture in Jerusalem during Israeli Occupation Approval of Director of the Institute of Social and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. ilkay Salihoğlu Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oleg Nikitenko We certify that this thesis is satisfactory for the award of the degree of Master of Science in Architecture Examining Committee in Charge: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oleg Nikitenko Dr. Ayten Ozsavas Akcay Dr. Huriye Gurdalli 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First, I would like to thank my supervisor Assoc. Prof. Dr. Oleg Nikitenko for his invaluable advice and belief in my work through the course of my master degree. Great thanks to my parents Fouad and Ekram Mushasha for their constant support and encouragement all the time. Special thank to the staff of Architecture Department in Near East University for their great support to me from the first day for me in the university. Finally, I would like to thank all my friends for their advice and support. 4 ABSTRACT Architecture always played an important role in the formation of societies, giving us an explanation of the life style of various nations. In the case of Jerusalem, all through the past century, in parallel to politics and economy architecture had a great influence in changing the identity and nature of Jerusalem architecture, putting it to use in achieving political goals there, which consequently made it synonymous to language of war. -
News Census Helps Palestinians in Jerusalem Numbers Game
Jerusalem Historical Facts & Figures Prior to the 1948 War, Palestinians formed the overwhelming majority in the Jerusalem district and owned most of the land. The last British Survey of Palestine (Dec. 1946) made the following demo- graphic estimates: Population pre-1948: 300,000 253,270 250,000 164,440 200,000 150,590 Jerusalem 150,000 99,320 102,520 100,000 65,010 Sub-Districts 50,000 110 160 0 Palestinians Jews Other Total Property Ownership 1948: West Jerusalem Jerusalem Sub-District Western Villages Palestinian 40.0% Jewish 2.0% Public 14.0% Palestinian 90.0% Public 33.9% Jewish 10.0% Palestinian 84.0% Jewish 26.1% (Source: A Survey of Palestine, Britain, 1946; Sami Hadawi, Palestinian Rights and Losses in 1948. London, 1988. NB: ‘Public’ includes land owned by Palestinian religious institutions and government land.) During the War of 1948, Jewish forces captured much of the territory assigned to the proposed Arab state, including 85% of Jerusalem (mainly in the city’s western part and surrounding neighborhoods). The Jordanian Arab Legion took control of the West Bank, including 11% of the eastern part of Jerusalem (including the Old City and adjacent villages). The remaining 4% of the Jerusalem area was considered no-man's land in which the UN established its headquarters. Some 64,000-80,000 Palestinians fled the western part of Jerusalem and the nearby villages. In June 1948, their property came under the control of the Israeli ‘Custodian of Absentee Property’. Some 40 Palestinian villages in and around Jerusalem were depopulated, many of them destroyed.