Three-Dimensional Topological Twistronics

Fengcheng Wu,1 Rui-Xing Zhang,1 and Sankar Das Sarma1 1Condensed Matter Theory Center and Joint Quantum Institute, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA We introduce a theoretical framework for the new concept of three-dimensional (3D) twistronics by developing a generalized Bloch band theory for 3D layered systems with a constant twist angle θ between successive layers. Our theory employs a nonsymmorphic symmetry that enables a precise definition of an effective out-of-plane crystal momentum, and also captures the in-plane moir´epat- tern formed between neighboring twisted layers. To demonstrate the novel topological physics that can be achieved through 3D twistronics, we present two examples. In the first example of chiral twisted graphite, Weyl nodes arise because of inversion-symmetry breaking, with θ-tuned transitions between type-I and type-II Weyl fermions, as well as magic angles at which the in-plane velocity vanishes. In the second example of twisted Weyl semimetal, the twist in the lattice structure induces a chiral gauge field A that has a vortex-antivortex lattice configuration. Line modes bound to the vortex cores of the A field give rise to 3D Weyl physics in the moir´escale. We also discuss possible experimental realizations of 3D twistronics.

Introduction.— Moir´esuperlattices formed in twisted tween adjacent twisted layers. The vortex cores of the bilayers lead to novel two-dimensional (2D) phenomena. A field bind line modes with position dependent chiral- In twisted bilayer graphene (TBG), there are magic twist ities, which generalizes the quasi-1D physics of a Weyl angles, at which moir´ebands become nearly flat due to nanotube under torsion [16] to 3D. The periodic array vanishing Dirac velocity [1] and many-body interactions of the coupled vortex line modes gives rise to 3D Weyl are effectively enhanced. TBG represents a prototypical fermions with moir´e-scalemodulations in the wave func- system for 2D twistronics [2], where the twist angle serves tion. Therefore, the twist angle provides a new tuning as a new tuning parameter. Given the greatly exciting knob to create and manipulate Weyl fermions, and, more 2D physics developing in TBG such as the discovery of generally, topological phases in 3D. superconducting and correlated insulating states [3–14], Theory.— We construct a generalized Bloch band the- it is natural to wonder whether the concept of twistronics ory for the chiral twisted structure shown in Fig. 1(a). can be generalized to 3D systems. The continuum Hamiltonian for this system is In this Letter, we present a theoretical framework for Z X 2 n † 3D twistronics that can be realized in 3D layered sys- H = d r ψn(r)hn(kk)ψn(r) tems with a constant twist angle θ between successive n (1) layers. This 3D chiral twisted structure [Fig. 1(a)] gener- † o + [ψ (r)Tn(r)ψn+1(r) + H.c.] , ally breaks the translational symmetry in all spatial di- n rections and thus the conventional Bloch theorem cannot where n is the layer index, r and kk = −i∂r are respec- be applied. However, the structure has an exact non- tively the 2D in-plane position and momentum operators, † symmorphic symmetry, which consists of an in-plane θ ψn(r) represents the field operator for low-energy states, rotation followed by an out-of-plane translation. We use hn(kk) is the in-plane Hamiltonian for each 2D building † this screw rotational symmetry to define a generalized block, and Tn(r) is the interlayer tunneling. Here ψ can Bloch’s theorem, where the modified crystal momenta be a multicomponent spinor due to sublattices, orbitals, are well defined. Various 3D moir´ephysics can be ex- spins, etc. The layer dependence of hn and Tn is deter- plored by considering different 2D building blocks in our mined by the twist relation: theoretical framework. ˆ ˆ We apply our theory to two systems. In the first sys- hn[R(nθ)kk] = h0(kk),Tn[R(nθ)r] = T0(r), (2) tem of chiral twisted graphite with graphene as the 2D where Rˆ is a rotation matrix. T0(r) has an in-plane moir´e building block, Weyl fermions arise due to the inversion- periodicity (∝ 1/θ) when θ is small. symmetry breaking in the twisted structure. Both type-I The 3D twisted structure generally breaks transla- arXiv:1909.01350v3 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 13 Apr 2020 and type-II [15] Weyl fermions can be realized depend- tional symmetry in all spatial directions, making it ing on the value of θ. Moreover, we find two magic an- appear hopeless for theoretical treatments. However, gles at which the in-plane Fermi velocity of the Weyl Eq. (2) implies that the Hamiltonian H is invariant under fermions vanishes, representing the realization of magic- a nonsymmorphic operation, which rotates a layer by θ angle Weyl physics for the first time. In the second sys- and then translates it along the out-of-planez ˆ direction tem of twisted Weyl semimetal, we study effects of chi- by the interlayer distance dz. This nonsymmorphic sym- ral twist in the lattice structure on Weyl fermions that metry suggests a generalized Bloch wave for the system: already exist even without the twist. The chiral twist in- 1 duces a chiral gauge field A that has a vortex-antivortex X −inkz ˆ ψkz (r) = √ e ψn[R(nθ)r], (3) lattice configuration in the moir´e pattern formed be- N n 2

(a) (b) which we construct by starting from an infinite num- 0.15 Type-II Weyl Fermion Type-I Weyl Fermion Type-II Weyl Fermion ber of graphene layers with AAA... stacking, and then rotating the nth layer by nθ around a common hexagon

0.10 center. In each layer, low-energy electrons reside in ±K

퐹 푣

/ valleys, which are related by spinless time-reversal sym- 푣 metry Tˆ and can be studied separately as in TBG. We 0.05 |풗∥| 2nd Magic Angle 1st Magic Angle focus on +K valley, with the in-plane k · p Hamiltonian h(k ) = v k · σ, where v is the monolayer graphene |풗 | k ~ F k F ퟏ 6 ∘ ∘ ∘ Dirac velocity (∼ 10 m/s) and σ is the sublattice Pauli 1.0 휃푀,2 휃퐶,2 1.4 휃퐶,1 휃푀,1 1.8 휃 matrix. The interlayer tunneling T (r) is [1, 17]

FIG. 1. (a)Illustration of a 3D twisted structure with a con-  w w e−i2πj/3 X AA AB igj+1·r T (r) = i2πj/3 e (6) stant twist angle θ between successive layers. (b) Summary wABe wAA of results on magic-angle Weyl fermions in chiral twisted j=0,1,2 graphite. The plot shows the in-plane velocity vk and one where wAA and wAB are respectively intra-sublattice and of the out-of-plane velocities v1 for the Weyl fermion at inter-sublattice tunneling parameters, with wAA ≈ 90 k1/2 = (0, 0, π/2). vk vanishes at magic angles θM,1 and θM,2. meV and wAB ≈ 117 meV. g is a moir´ereciprocal lat- v1 changes sign at θC,1 and θC,2, which mark transitions be- 1 tween type-I and type-II Weyl fermions. tice vector (0, 4π/3aM ), and aM = a0/θ, where a0 is the monolayer graphene lattice constant. The other two vec- tors g2,3 are related to g1 by ±2π/3 rotations. We note where N is the number of layers, and the good quantum that aM is the TBG moir´eperiodicity,√ but T (r) in Eq. (6) number kz is an effective out-of-plane crystal momentum has a periodicity ofa ˜M = 3aM . ikz −ikz † measured in units of 1/dz. This Bloch wave is a super- The kz-dependent moir´epotential ∆ = e T +e T position of electron states on a spiral line around the can be decomposed into ∆0σ0 + ∆xσx + ∆yσy, where ∆0 screw-rotation axis, as illustrated by the purple lines in is a scalar potential. From ∆, we can define an effec- Fig. 1(a). Under this generalized Bloch representation, tive gauge field A = (∆x, ∆y)/(evF ) that couples to the the Hamiltonian H becomes Dirac Hamiltonian h(kk), and a corresponding pseudo Z magnetic field b = ∇ × A. 2D maps of ∆ and b at X 2 n † z r 0 z H = d r ψ (r)h(k )ψk (r) kz k z kz = 0 are plotted in Fig. 2, which shows that |bz| can ◦ kz (4) reach ∼200 T for θ = 1.1 . h io ˆ + ψ† (r)eikz T (r)ψ [Rˆ(−θ)r] + H.c. , The effective Hamiltonian H = h(kk)+∆ respects C3z kz kz and Cˆ2zTˆ symmetries, where Cˆnz is the n-fold rotation where we use h and T as short-hand notations respec- aroundz ˆ axis. We diagonalize H using a plane-wave tively for h0 and T0. It is worth noting that the appear- expansion, and show the calculated band structures at ˆ ◦ ance of R(−θ) in Eq. (4) signals the breaking of in-plane θ = 1.1 in Fig. 2. Bands along kz axis can be char- translation symmetries. To proceed, we expand T (r) by acterized by the Cˆ3z angular momentum `z ∈ {0, ±1}. P ig·r moir´eharmonics: T (r) = g Tge , where g is a moir´e As shown in Fig. 2(b), crossings between two bands with reciprocal lattice vector. T (r) generates in-plane mo- different `z actually represent 3D Weyl nodes, which ap- 0 ˆ pear abundantly along k axis. For example, the Weyl mentum scatterings specified by kk = R(θ)kk + g. For z fermion at γ point (k = 0) has an effective Hamiltonian low-energy physics, |kk| is generally of the same order ∗ ∗ ˆ of magnitude as |g|, which is proportional to θ. Thus, ~(vF kk · σ + vz kzσz), which is constrained by both C3z ˆ ˆ ˆ ∗ ∗ R(±θ) can be approximated by an identity matrix in the and C2zT symmetries. The θ dependence of (vF , vz ) is ∗ small θ limit, and the error is on the order θ|g|  |g|. shown in Fig. 2(c). vF is reduced from the bare value vF , Under this approximation, H acquires a moir´etransla- but remains finite for θ from 0.7◦ to 2◦. Remarkably, the ∗ tional symmetry: sign of vz oscillates with θ, and therefore, the chirality of Z the Weyl node at γ point is twist angle dependent. X 2 † H ≈ d rψ (r)[h(k ) + ∆(k , r)]ψ (r), Another representative Weyl node is located at k1/2 = kz k z kz kz (5) (0, 0, π/2). This Weyl node is pinned to zero energy

ikz −ikz † by a particle-hole like symmetry H(−kk, π − kz, −r) = ∆(kz, r) = e T (r) + e T (r), −H(kk, kz, r), and is described by ~[vkkk · σ + v1qz(σ0 + which gives rise to energy bands in the 3D momentum σz)/2 + v2qz(σ0 − σz)/2)], where v1,2 are two indepen- ◦ space spanned by kz and the in-plane moir´eBrillouin dent parameters and qz = kz − π/2. For θ between 1 ◦ zone. Eq. (5) is our effective Hamiltonian for the 3D and 1.8 , v2 is always negative, but v1 changes sign at ◦ ◦ small-angle twisted system, which builds in exactly the θC,1 ≈ 1.52 and θC,2 ≈ 1.22 , which are critical an- nonsymmorphic symmetry and captures the moir´epat- gles that mark transitions between type-I and type-II tern formed in neighboring twisted layers. Weyl fermions [Fig. 1(b)]. Moreover, the in-plane veloc- ◦ ◦ Chiral twisted graphite.— We apply our theory to ity vk vanishes at both θM,1 ≈ 1.67 and θM,2 ≈ 1.09 , study electronic structure of chiral twisted graphite, which can be identified as two magic angles. Here the 3

(a) ∘ (c) 푘 = 0 (d) ∘ 휃 = 1.1 , 푘푧 = 0 0.5 푧 0.15 휃 = 1.1

50 0.4 ) 2

품1 − m ) 휅′′ ∗ 0.1

0.3 푣 n

퐹 퐹

훾 1

0 휅 휅′ 푣

−

/

meV

( V 푣 0.2

품 품 e

퐸 2 3 ( 0.05

50 0.1 DOS ∗ 0 푣푧 1 0 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 40 20 0 20 40 휅 훾 휅′' 휅′′'' 2 휅 휃 퐸(meV) 3 0 0.5 −150 0 150 (b)20 4 (e) (f) ℓ푧 Δ0(eV) 푏푧(T) +51

−16 10

07 )

8

meV 푀

0 푀

(

෤

෤

푎

푎

퐸

/

/

푦 푦 10

∘ 20 휃 = 1.1 0 푘푧 푥/푎෤푀 푥/푎෤푀

FIG. 2. Results of chiral twisted graphite. (a) In-plane and (b) out-of-plane band structure. In (a) kz is 0. In (b), kk is zero, the crossings between bands with different `z represent Weyl nodes, the two purple dots highlight nodes located at kz = 0 and kz = π/2, and the spectrum is periodic in kz with a period 2π/3 due to a translation like symmetry H(kk, kz +2π/3, r+aM yˆ) = H(kk, kz, r). (c) In-plane and out-of-plane velocities of the k = 0 Weyl node as a function of θ. (d) DOS per spin, valley, layer and area for the twisted graphite (blue line), and corresponding DOS for monolayer graphene (black dashed line). (e) 2D maps ◦ of the scalar moir´epotential ∆0 and (f) pseudo magnetic field bz at kz = 0 and θ = 1.1 .

2 value of θM,1 can also be estimated using an analytical M(k)σz, where M(k) = M0(cos kz −cos Qz)−M1kk with perturbation theory, agreeing quantitatively with our di- parameters M0,1 > 0 and 0 < Qz < π. Each site on the 3 rect band structure calculations; see Supplemental Ma- cubic lattice accommodates two orbitals |jz = 2 i and terial (SM)[18]. The low-energy density of states (DOS) 1 |jz = 2 i, which have different angular momentum jz and per layer in the twisted graphite near the magic angles form the basis of the Pauli matrices σ. The Hamilto- is orders of magnitude larger than that in monolayer nian hW breaks time reversal symmetry and hosts two graphene [Fig. 2(d)], which should enhance interaction Weyl nodes with opposite chiralities located respectively effects, leading to interaction driven quantum phase tran- at k± = (0, 0, ±Qz). sitions. We now consider a twisted cubic lattice in which We now compare our results with related works. the nth layer is rotated by nθ aroundz ˆ axis following Ref. 19 studied multiple graphene layers with twist angle Fig. 1(a). The effective Hamiltonian HW for this twisted (−1)nθ that alternates with the layer index n. Their 3D structure is given by structure preserves inversion symmetry, in contrast with our chiral twisted graphite structure. Ref. 20 studied the 0  −i(φ +g·r) X 0 e g same structure as ours but with a different method under HW = hW + 2tsp sin kz ei(φg +g·r) 0 the coherent phase approximation. Our theory employs g the exact nonsymmorphic symmetry, which allows us to (7) precisely define the kz momentum and clearly demon- where tsp characterizes the inter-orbital tunneling be- strate magic-angle Weyl physics in the twisted graphite. tween neighboring layers. The summation over g is re- In Ref. 21, twisted trilayer graphene has been theoreti- stricted to the first shell of moir´ereciprocal lattice vec- cally studied. An interesting question is how many lay- tors (|g| = 2π/aM with moir´eperiod aM equal to a0/θ), ers are required in practice to realize our predicted 3D and φg is the orientation angle of g. Here the inter- physics, which we leave for future study. layer tunneling matrix is derived using a two-center ap- Twisted Weyl semimetal.— As another demonstration, proximation, and the spatial modulation of interlayer we apply our theory to twisted Weyl semimetal with lat- intra-orbital tunneling is neglected, which are thoroughly tice structure also shown in Fig. 1(a). We start by in- explained in the SM [18]. Compared with the twisted troducing a minimal Weyl semimetal model on a simple graphite Hamiltonian, HW does not have a scalar moir´e cubic lattice (lattice constant a0): hW = ~vW kk · σ + potential term. 4

(a) ≈ (d)

50 1 50 1 1 푗 = 푗 =

푧 푧 푀 푎

) 2 2

/ 푦

0 0

meV (

퐸 3 3 푗 = 푗 = 50 푧 2 50 푧 2

−1 ≈

−0.55 −0.5 −0.45 0.45 0.5 0.55 2 2 푧/푑 푘푧/휋 푧 0 22 45 67 90 −10 0 10 (b) 푏푧(T) (c) (e)

1 0.6 1

0.4

푊

푀

푀

푎 푣

/ 0

푎 /

0 푦

/

∗

푊

푦 푣 0.2 −1

−1 0 −1 0 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 푥/푎푀 휃

FIG. 3. Results of twisted Weyl semimetal. (a) Out-of-plane band structure in the twisted Weyl semimetal. In-plane momentum is zero. Red and blue lines respectively mark right and left moving modes that cross Weyl nodes located at kz = ±π/2. jz 2 specifies the angular momentum of each mode. Model parameters are M0 = 869 meV, M1 = 10.36 eV A˚ , tsp = 4 meV, 5 vW = 3.74 × 10 m/s, a0 = 7.5 A,˚ and Qz = π/2. (b) 2D maps of the pseudo magnetic field bz(kz = π/2), which is positive and ◦ ∗ negative, respectively, around integer R and half-integer R1/2 positions. θ = 1 in (a) and (b). (c) The in-plane velocity vW of ∗ the Weyl node as a function of θ. The out-of-plane velocity vz (not shown) barely changes with θ. (d) Real-space probability density of the right moving modes in (a). The peaks of the density are at R positions in each 2D layer, and wind around the screw rotation axis. (e) Similar as (d) but for the left moving modes in (a), and the peaks are located at R1/2 positions.

We can extract an effective gauge field A from HW , a real-space pumping of electrons from R to R1/2 posi- similar to the case of twisted graphite. The A field has tions, or vice versa. The 2D array of VLMs can further a vortex-antivortex lattice configuration in the moir´esu- hybridize with each other, and we expect them to realize perlattices [18]. The corresponding pseudo magnetic field Weyl fermions with moir´e-scalemodulations in the wave bz is given by functions.

0 To verify the above picture, we numerically diagonalize 2tsp 2π X ig·r HW , and show the energy spectrum along kz in Fig. 3(a), bz = sin kz e , (8) evW aM where we find that the Weyl nodes are robust against g the twist. In Fig. 3(d) [Fig. 3(e)], we plot the real-space which is illustrated in Fig. 3(b). |bz| peaks at two distinct probability density of the right (left) moving modes high- types of positions in the moir´epattern, namely, integer lighted in Fig. 3(a), which is found to be primarily con- centrated at R (R ) positions. This density profile is positions R = (nx, ny)aM with nx,y ∈ Z and half-integer 1/2 1 1 consistent with the above semiclassical analysis. Because positions R1/2 = R + ( 2 , 2 )aM , which are also locations of vortex cores of the A field. We assume tsp/vW > 0, of the twisted structure, these modes track spiral lines in and bz is positive and negative respectively at R and real space. From the semiclassical picture, the in-plane ∗ R1/2 for 0 < kz < π. Being proportional to sin kz, bz rep- velocity vW of the 3D Weyl fermions is controlled by the resents a chiral magnetic field as it couples oppositely to coupling strength between neighboring VLMs, and there- the Weyl nodes with different topological charges. In the fore, by the moir´eperiod aM . Numerical results plotted ∗ semiclassical picture, around R (R1/2) positions, this in Fig. 3(c) confirm that vW decreases with decreasing ∗ chiral magnetic field leads to chiral Landau levels that θ (equivalently, increasing aM ). For small enough θ, vW propagate along positive (negative)z ˆ direction for both nearly vanishes, showing that VLMs located at different Weyl nodes at k±. These chiral Landau levels bound to positions are essentially decoupled. Thus, the twist angle vortex cores of the A field can be considered to be vortex provides a new tuning knob to control the band structure line modes (VLMs). The chirality of a VLM depends on of 3D Weyl materials. its position in the moir´epattern. An important physical Conclusion.— In summary, we develop a general theo- consequence is that an out-of-plane electric field can drive retical framework for 3D twistronics and apply the theory 5 to chiral twisted graphite and twisted Weyl semimetal. tems, where 2D Dirac physics and 3D Weyl physics have Our theory can in principle be realized in van der Waals been demonstrated[24–32]. The flexibility of building heterostructures constructed by stacking multiple twisted metamaterials makes them promising platforms for our layers. Moreover, chiral twisted van der Waals nanowires proposed 3D topological twistronics. Our predictions can have recently been experimentally synthesized[22, 23], in- be tested in experimental systems as disparate as suitably dicating that the chiral twisted structure we study can designed photonic structures and engineered solid state indeed appear in materials. Similar to 2D twisted bi- heterostructures as well as in layered systems made from layers, 3D twisted systems can provide new playgrounds graphite and manually stacked multilayer graphene. for strongly correlated physics. As an example, super- conducting instability should be enhanced in 3D twisted We thank Yang-Zhi Chou for discussions. This work is graphite near the magic angles due to the strong veloc- supported by the Laboratory for Physical Sciences and ity suppression. In addition to solid state materials, our Microsoft. R.-X. Z. is supported by a JQI Postdoctoral theory should be realizable in photonic and phononic sys- Fellowship.

[1] R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Proc. Natl. Acad. [19] E. Khalaf, A. J. Kruchkov, G. Tarnopolsky, and A. Vish- Sci. U.S.A. 108, 12233 (2011). wanath, Phys. Rev. B 100, 085109 (2019). [2] S. Carr, D. Massatt, S. Fang, P. Cazeaux, M. Luskin, [20] T. Cea, N. R. Walet, and F. Guinea, Nano Lett. 19, and E. Kaxiras, Phys. Rev. B 95, 075420 (2017). 8683 (2019). [3] Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, [21] C. Mora, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nature 556, 43 Lett. 123, 026402 (2019). (2018). [22] P. Sutter, S. Wimer, and E. Sutter, Nature 570, 354 [4] Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, (2019). J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, [23] Y. Liu, J. Wang, S. Kim, H. Sun, F. Yang, Z. Fang, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- N. Tamura, R. Zhang, X. Song, J. Wen, B. Z. Xu, Herrero, Nature 556, 80 (2018). M. Wang, S. Lin, Q. Yu, K. B. Tom, Y. Deng, J. Turner, [5] M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watan- E. Chan, D. Jin, R. O. Ritchie, A. M. Minor, D. C. abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Chrzan, M. C. Scott, and J. Yao, Nature 570, 358 Science 363, 1059 (2019). (2019). [6] X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, [24] M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Sza- et al., arXiv:1903.06513 . meit, Nature 496, 196 (2013). [7] A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, [25] L. Lu, Z. Wang, D. Ye, L. Ran, L. Fu, J. D. Joannopoulos, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and and M. Soljaˇci´c,Science 349, 622 (2015). D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Science 365, 605 (2019). [26] B. Yang, Q. Guo, B. Tremain, R. Liu, L. E. Barr, Q. Yan, [8] M. Serlin, C. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, W. Gao, H. Liu, Y. Xiang, J. Chen, et al., Science 359, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. Young, 1013 (2018). arXiv:1907.00261 . [27] D. Wang, B. Yang, W. Gao, H. Jia, Q. Yang, X. Chen, [9] P. San-Jose, J. Gonz´alez, and F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. M. Wei, C. Liu, M. Navarro-C´ıa,J. Han, et al., Nature Lett. 108, 216802 (2012). Physics (2019). [10] H. C. Po, L. Zou, A. Vishwanath, and T. Senthil, Phys. [28] H. Jia, R. Zhang, W. Gao, Q. Guo, B. Yang, J. Hu, Y. Bi, Rev. X 8, 031089 (2018). Y. Xiang, C. Liu, and S. Zhang, Science 363, 148 (2019). [11] M. Koshino, N. F. Q. Yuan, T. Koretsune, M. Ochi, [29] M. Xiao, W.-J. Chen, W.-Y. He, and C. T. Chan, Nat. K. Kuroki, and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031087 (2018). Phys. 11, 920 (2015). [12] J. Kang and O. Vafek, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031088 (2018). [30] Z. Yang and B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 224301 [13] J. Liu, J. Liu, and X. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 99, 155415 (2016). (2019). [31] F. Li, X. Huang, J. Lu, J. Ma, and Z. Liu, Nat. Phys. [14] Z. Song, Z. Wang, W. Shi, G. Li, C. Fang, and B. A. 14, 30 (2018). Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 036401 (2019). [32] W. Dorrell, H. Pirie, S. M. Gardezi, N. C. Drucker, and [15] A. A. Soluyanov, D. Gresch, Z. Wang, Q. Wu, M. Troyer, J. E. Hoffman, arXiv:1909.13854 (2019). X. Dai, and B. A. Bernevig, Nature 527, 495 (2015). [33] C. Zheng, R. Hoffmann, and D. R. Nelson, J. Am. Chem. [16] D. I. Pikulin, A. Chen, and M. Franz, Phys. Rev. X 6, Soc. 112, 3784 (1990). 041021 (2016). [17] J. M. B. Lopes dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. Castro Neto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 256802 (2007). [18] See Supplemental Material at URL for a perturbation theory that estimates the first magic angle in chiral twisted graphite, and a derivation of the interlayer tun- neling matrix in twisted Weyl semimetal, which includes Ref. 33. 6

Supplemental Material

This Supplemental Material includes four sections. Sections S1 and S2 provide additional discussion, respectively, on the generalized Bloch theory and on chiral twisted graphite. Section S3 is on a perturbation theory that provides a quantitative estimation of the first magic angle θM,1 in chiral twisted graphite. Section S4 presents a derivation of the interlayer tunneling matrix in twisted Weyl semimetal.

S1. GENERALIZED BLOCH THEORY

In this section, we provide additional discussions on the generalized Bloch theory. We note that the 1D version of our generalized Bloch that employs the nonsymmorphic symmetry has been con- sidered previously in the literature, for example, Ref. 33. For the chiral twisted structure in Fig. 1 of the main text, we assume open boundary condition alongz ˆ direction and an infinite number of layers. Under this assumption, the nonsymmorphic symmetry is exact, since each layer has a successive partner. The effective out-of-plane momentum kz is a good quantum number due to this nonsymmorphic symmetry and takes continuous values between −π and +π. With this open boundary condition, the twist angle θ between adjacent layers does NOT have to be rational in the form of 2πp/q, where p and q are integers. If periodic boundary condition is imposed alongz ˆ direction, the nonsymmorphic symmetry is exact only if θ takes rational values of 2πp/q and Nθ is an integer multiple of 2π. In this case, N, the number of layers, can be finite, and kz takes discrete values between −π and +π. Irrational θ/(2π) can be approximated by a rational number when periodic boundary condition is used. In the derivation that leads to Eq. (5) of the main text, we approximate the rotation matrix Rˆ(θ) by an identity matrix. Overall, this approximation is to neglect effects on the order of O(θ2). In real space, this is equivalent to neglect effects of “moir´eof moir´e”that appear on the length scale of aM /θ. We expect our theory to be accurate for ◦ system size below aM /θ. For very small twist angles (e.g. 0.1 ), aM /θ is much greater than aM , which indicates that our theory should have a wide application range regarding the system size. In the main text, we only keep interlayer tunneling terms between adjacent layers. Tunnelings between layers that are further apart also respect the nonsymmorphic symmetry and can be treated using our theoretical framework but with some modifications. For example, the twist angle between next-nearest-neighbor layers is 2θ, and the corresponding tunneling terms have a periodicity of 2aM instead of aM , which can lead to further Brillouin zone folding effect in the momentum space. We expect that the topological physics that we study remains robust for weak remote out-of-plane tunneling effects.

S2. HAMILTONIAN AND SYMMETRY OF CHIRAL TWISTED GRAPHITE

We present a derivation of the Hamiltonian of chiral twisted graphite by starting from that of twisted bilayer graphene (TBG), and discuss the symmetries of the Hamiltonian and their implications on Weyl points. The moir´eHamiltonian for TBG in +K valley is given by

˜ ˜  ˜ h0(kk) T (r) HTBG = ˜† ˜ , (S1) T (r) h1(kk) where h˜ (k ) and h˜ (k ) are Dirac Hamiltonians associated respectively with the bottom and top layers, h˜ (k ) = 0 k 1 k √ 0 k ˜ iθσz ~vF (kk − κ+) · σ and h1(kk) = ~vF e [(kk − κ−) · σ]. Here κ±, equal to [4π/(3aM )](− 3/2, ∓1/2), capture the layer-dependent momentum shift of the Dirac cones. aM is a0/θ, where a0 is the lattice constant of mononlayer graphene. The interlayer tunneling is given by

−ib+·r −ib−·r T˜(r) = T1 + T2e + T3e ,  −i2π(j−1)/3 wAA wABe (S2) Tj = i2π(j−1)/3 , wABe wAA √ √ where b± represent TBG reciprocal lattice vectors given by [4π/( 3aM )](±1/2, 3/2), and Tj with j = 1, 2 and 3 are hermitian matrices. H˜TBG specified by Eqs. (S1) and (S2) has an in-plane periodicity of aM . 7

We now apply a layer dependent gauge transformation to H˜TBG in order to move the Dirac points at momenta κ± to the moir´eBrillouin zone center:  −iκ ·r   +iκ ·r    e + 0 ˜ e + 0 h0(kk) T (r) HTBG = −iκ−·r HTBG +iκ−·r = † , 0 e 0 e T (r) h1(kk)

iθσz h0(kk) = ~vF kk · σ, h1(kk) = ~vF e (kk · σ), (S3)

−iκ+·r +iκ−·r X ig ·r T (r) = e T˜(r)e = Tje j , j=1,2,3 where g = (0, 4π/3a ), and g are related to g by ±2π/3 rotation. After the gauge transformation, the twist 1 M 2,3 1 √ relation becomes apparent as h [Rˆ(θ)k ] = h (k ). We note that |g | = |b |/ 3, and therefore, the new Hamiltonian 1 k √0 k 1 + HTBG has an in-plane periodicity ofa ˜M = 3aM . The new Hamiltonian HTBG serves as a 2D building block for chiral twisted graphite, of which the effective Hamiltonian H is given by

H(kk, kz, r) = h(kk) + ∆(kz, r),

h(kk) = ~vF kk · σ, (S4)

ikz −ikz † ∆(kz, r) = e T (r) + e T (r), where T (r) is specified above in Eq. (S3). √ We list symmetries of H. By construction, H has an in-plane periodicity ofa ˜M = 3aM , and respects both Cˆ3z and Cˆ2zTˆ symmetries. In addition, H has two emergent symmetries described as follows. (1) A translation like symmetry H(kk, kz + 2π/3, r + aM yˆ) = H(kk, kz, r). Due to this symmetry, the energy spectra at kz and kz + 2π/3 are identical, and physical quantities such as electron density have a smaller spatial period of aM compared toa ˜M . (2) A particle-hole like symmetry H(−kk, π − kz, −r) = −H(kk, kz, r). The above symmetries can have important implications on Weyl points. (1) The Weyl points at k0 = (0, 0, 0) and k1 = (0, 0, π) are symmetry enforced due to the Cˆ3z and Cˆ2zTˆ symmetries. (2) The particle-hole like symmetry pins the Weyl point at k1/2 = (0, 0, π/2) to zero energy. It is important to note that while some properties (e.g., energy and/or momentum) of the Weyl nodes are influenced by these symmetries, the very existence of the Weyl nodes are not.

S3. PERTURBATION THEORY FOR THE MAGIC ANGLE IN CHIRAL TWISTED GRAPHITE

We present an analytical perturbation theory for the Weyl node at k1/2 = (0, 0, π/2) by truncating the corresponding plane-wave expansion of H to the first momentum shell:

h(0) iT1 iT2 iT3 −iT1 −iT2 −iT3  −iT1 h(−g1) O O O iT3 iT2    −iT2 O h(−g2) O iT3 O iT1    H ≈ −iT3 O O h(−g3) iT2 iT1 O  , (S5)  iT O −iT −iT h(g ) OO   1 3 2 1   iT2 −iT3 O −iT1 O h(g2) O  iT3 −iT2 −iT1 O O O h(g3) which are expanded using the 7 in-plane momenta including 0 and ±g1,2,3. In Eq. (S5), kz has been set to π/2, and O represents a 2 × 2 zero matrix. We find that the truncated Hamiltonian in Eq. (S5) has two zero-energy solutions with eigenvectors given respectively by 1 |Φ i = {(1, 0), ψ , ψ , ψ , ψ , ψ , ψ }T , A N 1 2 3 1 2 3 A (S6) 1 T |ΦBi = {(0, 1), ϕ1, ϕ2, ϕ3, ϕ1, ϕ2, ϕ3} , NB where NA,B are normalization factors. The two-component spinors ψj and ϕj are found to be: 2 2 α1 − α1 − α0 α0(1 + 3α1) i(j−1)2π/3 ψj = 2 2 , 2 2 e , 1 − 2α0 − α1 1 − 2α0 − α1 2 2 (S7)  α0(3α1 − 1) −i(j−1)2π/3 α1 + α1 − α0  ϕj = 2 2 e , 2 2 , 1 − 2α0 − α1 1 − 2α0 − α1 8 where (α0, α1) = (wAA, wAB)/(~vF |g1|). Here ψ1,2,3 are related by ±2π/3 rotations in the spinor space, and the same is also true for ϕ1,2,3. By projecting the Hamiltonian H onto the subspace of {|ΦAi, |ΦBi} to linear order in kk and qz = kz − π/2, we obtain an effective Hamiltonian for the Weyl fermion at k1/2   v1qz vk(kx − iky) HWeyl = ~ , (S8) vk(kx + iky) v2qz where the in-plane velocity vk from this perturbation theory is given by

2 4 2 2 4 1 1 − 4α0 + 10α0 − 8(1 + α0)α1 + 7α1 vk/vF = 2 2 2 . (S9) NANB (1 − 2α0 − α1)

∗ ◦ ∗ ◦ The analytical expression in Eq. (S9) indicates that vk vanishes at two magic angles θM,1 ≈ 1.87 and θM,2 ≈ 0.46 , which are obtained using numerical values of (vF , wAA, wAB) listed in the main text. By comparison, the magic ◦ ◦ ∗ angles given by the full band structure calculations are θM,1 ≈ 1.67 and θM,2 ≈ 1.09 . Thus, θM,1 provides a ∗ semiquantitative estimation of θM,1, but θM,2 differs significantly from θM,2, as the truncated Hamiltonian in Eq. (S5) becomes less accurate at smaller twist angles. We have also checked that the out-of-plane velocities v1 and v2 are generally different within the perturbation theory, confirming that the effective Hamiltonian HWeyl expanded around k1/2 indeed describes Weyl fermion.

S4. INTERLAYER TUNNELING MATRIX IN TWISTED WEYL SEMIMETAL

In our model of twisted Weyl semimetal, each layer has a square lattice structure, and each site hosts two orbitals 3 1 |jz = 2 i and |jz = 2 i. To derive the interlayer tunneling between two twisted layers, we use a two-step approach under a local approximation. In the first step, we consider two layers with a zero twist angle (θ = 0) but with a finite in-plane displacement d.

The d-dependence of the interlayer tunneling is denoted as wλ1λ2 (d) = hλ1|HT |λ2id, where λ1,2 label orbitals that reside respectively in layer 1 and 2, |λii represents the corresponding Bloch wave state with a zero in-plane crystal momentum, and HT is the interlayer tunneling Hamiltonian. Using the real space representation of Bloch waves, we can express wλ1λ2 (d) as

1 X wλ1λ2 (d) = hλ1, R1|HT |λ2, R2 + di, (S10) Nk R1,R2 where Nk is the number of unit cells in each layer, and R1,2 indicate lattice sites in the square lattice of layer 1. We now make a two-center approximation:

tλ1λ2 (δ) = hλ1, R|HT |λ2, R + δi, (S11) which is the hopping integral between an orbital λ1 at position R and another orbital λ2 at position R + δ, and is assumed to be independent of the position R. We further perform a Fourier transformation: tλ1λ2 (δ) = P iq·δ (1/Nk) q tλ1λ2 (q)e . Then wλ1λ2 (d) can be simplified to be

1 X wλ1λ2 (d) = tλ1λ2 (R2 + d − R1) Nk R1,R2 1 X X iq·(R2+d−R1) = e tλ λ (q) (S12) N 2 1 2 k R1,R2 q X iG·d = tλ1λ2 (G)e , G where G is the reciprocal lattice vector of the square lattice. The final expression in Eq. (S12) reflects the fact that wλ1λ2 (d) is a periodic function of d with the square lattice periodicity. In the second step, we now consider two twisted layers with a finite small twist angle (θ 6= 0). In a long-period moir´epattern, the local in-plane displacement d between the two layers has a spatial variation approximated by θzˆ × r, where r represents the coarse-grained in-plane position. We make a local approximation, assuming that the 9

(a) (b) −10 0 10 푏푧(T)

1 1

푀 푀 푎

푎 0 0

/ /

푦 푦

−1 −1

−11 0 1 −1 0 1 푥/푎푀 푥/푎푀

FIG. S1. (a) 2D plot of A field (represented by arrows). tsp/vW > 0 and kz = π/2 have been assumed. Both the red dots (R positions) and circles (R1/2 positions) indicate positions of vortex cores of the A field, but the corresponding pseudo magnetic field bz is respectively positive and negative at these two types of positions. The yellow dots are positions of antivoretx cores, where the corresponding bz field vanishes. (b) Corresponding 2D map of the bz field. interlayer tunneling varies in space following the local displacement d(r). Replacing d in Eq. (S12) by θzˆ × r, we obtain interlayer tunneling terms for the two twisted layers

X ig·r wλ1λ2 (r) = tλ1λ2 (G)e , (S13) G where g = θG×zˆ represents the moir´ereciprocal lattice vector, and wλ1λ2 (r) has the moir´eperiodicity of aM = a0/θ. We now use rotational symmetry to put further constraints on the tunneling terms. For intraorbital tunneling ˆ π (λ1 = λ2), tλλ(δ) in Eq. (S11) equals tλλ[R( 2 )δ] because of the rotational symmetry, and similarly, in the reciprocal ˆ π space, tλλ(G) = tλλ[R( 2 )G]. We expect that tλλ(q) in the reciprocal space should decay rapidly for |q|dz > 1 1, where dz is the interlayer distance. Therefore, we can just keep the g0 = G0 = 0 term in the intraorbital tunneling wλλ(r), which then has no spatial variation under this approximation. 1 The rotational symmetry plays a different role for interorbital tunneling. For definiteness, we take λ1 = 2 and 3 1 3 λ2 = 2 to respectively represent |jz = 2 i and |jz = 2 i states. Because the two states have different angular momenta, π π π t 1 3 [Rˆ( )δ] = exp(i )t 1 3 (δ). Correspondingly, in reciprocal space, t 1 3 [Rˆ( )G] = it 1 3 (G), which implies that 2 , 2 2 2 2 , 2 2 , 2 2 2 , 2 t 1 3 (G0 = 0) vanishes. Thus, the lowest moir´eharmonics that contribute to w 1 3 (r) are from the first shell of moir´e 2 , 2 2 , 2 3 reciprocal lattice vectors with |g| = 2π/aM . As a result, the interlayer tunneling matrix in the basis of |jz = 2 i and 1 |jz = 2 i can be parametrized as

0    −iφg  tpp 0 X ig·r 0 ie T (r) = + tsp e iφ , (S14) 0 tss −ie g 0 g where tss, tpp and tsp are tunneling parameters, and the summation over g is restricted to the first shell. The total effective Hamiltonian for the twisted Weyl semimetal is

2 ikz −ikz † HW = ~vW kk · σ − (M0 cos Qz + M1kk)σz + e T (r) + e T (r) 0    −i(φg +g·r) (S15) M(k) ~vW (kx − iky) X 0 e = + 2tsp sin kz i(φ +g·r) , vW (kx + iky) −M(k) e g 0 ~ g

2 where M(k) = M0(cos kz − cos Qz) − M1kk, and M0 = 2tpp = −2tss. We have chosen the parameter tsp to be real such that it is consistent with the intralayer term ~vW kk · σ. Based on Eq. (S15), we can define an effective gauge 10

field A as

0 2tsp X   A = sin k cos(g · r + φ ), sin(g · r + φ ) . (S16) ev z g g W g

Because A is proportional to sin kz, it represents a chiral gauge field that couples oppositely to Weyl nodes with different topological charges. An illustration of A field in the moir´epattern is demonstrated in Fig. S1, which shows that the A field has a vortex-antivortex lattice configuration.