DOCSLIB.ORG

Dormitory Authority of the State of New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dormitory Authority of the State of New York NEW ISSUE (See “Ratings” herein) $224,875,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK SCHOOL DISTRICTS REVENUE BOND FINANCING PROGRAM REVENUE BONDS $124,120,000 $22,065,000 $27,530,000 $39,840,000 $11,320,000 SERIES 2012A SERIES 2012B SERIES 2012C SERIES 2012D SERIES 2012E Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover Payment and Security: The School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A (the “Series 2012A Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012B (the “Series 2012B Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012C (the “Series 2012C Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012D (the “Series 2012D Bonds”), and the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012E (the “Series 2012E Bonds” and, together with the Series 2012A Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds, the Series 2012C Bonds and the Series 2012D Bonds, the “Series 2012 Bonds”), will be special obligations of the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (the “Authority”), payable solely from and secured by a pledge of payments to be made by certain School Districts (collectively, the “School Districts”) in the State of New York (the “State”) pursuant to the Financing Agreements (collectively the “Agreements”), dated as of April 1, 2012, between the Authority and such School Districts, and all funds and accounts (except the Arbitrage Rebate Fund) authorized under the Authority’s Master School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bond Resolution adopted May 29, 2002, as amended and supplemented (the “Master Resolution”), and established by the Authority’s Series Resolutions, adopted September 21, 2011, authorizing such Series (individually, the “Series 2012A Resolution,” the “Series 2012B Resolution,” the “Series 2012C Resolution”, the “Series 2012D Resolution,” and the “Series 2012E Resolution” and, together, the “Series 2012 Resolutions”). None of the funds and accounts established under a Series Resolution to secure a Series of Bonds shall secure any other Series of Bonds. There is no debt service reserve fund securing the Series 2012 Bonds and no real property of any School District secures the Series 2012 Bonds. Each School District is required under its Agreement to deliver its general obligation bonds (the “School District Bonds”) to the Authority to evidence its obligation to repay the loan (the “Loan”) to be made by the Authority to the School District from proceeds of the Series of Series 2012 Bonds relating to such Agreement. The principal and redemption price of and interest on the School District Bonds (“Loan Repayments”) are scheduled to be sufficient to repay, when due, the principal and redemption price of and interest on the Loan. Each School District is also required under its Agreement to pay such amounts as are required to be paid under the Agreement, including the fees and expenses of the Authority and the Trustee. To secure its payment of all amounts due under its Agreement, each School District under its Agreement has assigned and pledged to the Authority a sufficient portion of public funds apportioned or otherwise made payable by the State to such School District (the “Pledged Revenues”). Each School District has directed and acknowledged that the Pledged Revenues are to be paid directly to the Trustee pursuant to an assignment by the Authority as provided in the Act (as defined herein) and the Memorandum of Understanding among the Authority, the Comptroller of the State and the Commissioner of Education of the State upon the occurrence of certain events of default under its Agreement. Each Series of the Series 2012 Bonds will be separately secured by the pledge and assignment to the Trustee of the payments to be made by each School District to the Authority under its Agreement and on the School District Bonds and the Authority’s interest in the Pledged Revenues pledged and assigned to the Authority under the Agreements. Each School District will pledge its full faith and credit to the payment of the principal of and interest on the School District Bonds it delivers to the Authority and has the power and is required under State statutes to levy and collect ad valorem taxes on all taxable property within the School District for such payment. No School District is obligated to make payments on behalf of any other School District nor are the Pledged Revenues of any School District pledged to secure the obligation of any other School District. A default by any School District could cause a default on the applicable Series of the Series 2012 Bonds. See “PART 2 – SOURCES OF PAYMENT AND SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2012 BONDS.” The Series 2012 Bonds will not be a debt of the State nor will the State be liable thereon. The Authority has no taxing power. Bond Insurance: The scheduled payment of principal and interest on certain maturities of Series 2012 Bonds as set forth on the inside cover page of this Official Statement (collectively, the “Insured Bonds”) when due will be guaranteed under a municipal bond insurance policy to be issued concurrently with the delivery of the insured Bonds by Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. (“AGM” or the “Insurer”). Description: The Series 2012 Bonds will be issued as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. Interest (due each April 1 and October 1, commencing April 1, 2013) on the Series 2012 Bonds will be payable by check or draft mailed to the registered owners of the Series 2012 Bonds at their addresses as shown on the registration books held by the Trustee or, at the option of a registered owner of at least $1,000,000 in principal amount of the Series 2012 Bonds, by wire transfer to such owner, each as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the month next preceding an interest payment date. The principal and Redemption Price of the Series 2012 Bonds will be payable at the principal corporate trust office of U.S. Bank National Association, New York, New York, the Trustee and Paying Agent or, with respect to Redemption Price, at the option of a Holder of at least $1,000,000 in principal amount of the Series 2012 Bonds, by wire transfer to the Holders of such Series of Series 2012 Bonds as more fully described herein. The Series 2012 Bonds will be issued initially under a Book-Entry Only System, registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). Individual purchases of beneficial interests in the Series 2012 Bonds will be made in Book-Entry form without certificates. So long as DTC or its nominee is the registered owner of the Series 2012 Bonds, payments of the principal and interest on such Series of Series 2012 Bonds will be made directly to DTC or its nominee. Disbursement of such payments to DTC participants is the responsibility of DTC and disbursement of such payments to the beneficial owners is the responsibility of DTC participants. See “PART 3 – THE SERIES 2012 BONDS – Book-Entry Only System” herein. Redemption: The Series 2012 Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as more fully described herein. Tax Exemption: In the opinion of Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Bond Counsel to the Authority, under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and court decisions and assuming compliance with the covenants described herein and the accuracy of certain representations by the Authority and the School Districts (and their successors), interest on the Series 2012 Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that interest on the Series 2012 Bonds is not an “item of tax preference” for purposes of the individual and corporate alternative minimum taxes imposed under the Code; provided, however, that interest on the Series 2012 Bonds owned by corporations will be included in the calculation of adjusted current earnings, a portion of which is an adjustment to corporate alternative minimum taxable income for purposes of calculating the alternative minimum tax imposed on corporations. Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that interest on the Series 2012 Bonds is exempt under existing laws from personal income taxes imposed by the State of New York and its political subdivisions (including The City of New York). See “PART 10 – TAX MATTERS” herein regarding certain other tax considerations. The Series 2012 Bonds are offered when, as and if issued and received by the Underwriters. The offer of the Series 2012 Bonds may be subject to prior sale or may be withdrawn or modified at any time without notice. The offer is subject to the approval of legality by Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Albany, New York, Bond Counsel to the Authority, and to certain other conditions. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the Underwriters by their counsel, Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse, New York, and for each School District by its respective bond counsel as listed in Appendix B hereto. The Authority expects to deliver the Series 2012 Bonds in New York, New York, on or about June 14, 2012. Roosevelt & Cross Incorporated Blaylock Robert Van, LLC Janney Montgomery Scott RBC Capital Markets Edward Jones Ramirez & Co., Inc. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. Fidelity Capital Markets Services Raymond James | Morgan Keegan The Williams Capital Group, L.P. May 24, 2012 $224,875,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK SCHOOL DISTRICTS REVENUE BOND FINANCING PROGRAM REVENUE BONDS $124,120,000 SERIES 2012A Interest Interest Due Amount Rate Yield CUSIP(1) Due Amount Rate Yield CUSIP(1) Apr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chautauqua County
    CHAUTAUQUA Greenway Plan COUNTY April 2012 A four season destination for outdoor active living, nurtured by public/private partnerships. Prepared by Pashek Associates in cooperation with Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development “It is a wholesome and necessary thing for us to turn again to the earth and in the contemplation of her beauties to know of wonder and humility. - Rachel Carson” Photo Credit: Mark Geise All of the photographs in this document were taken at various locations throughout Chautauqua County. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A special thank you goes out to the citizens and organizations of Chautauqua County for their enthusiasm and input during this study. Also, the time commitment, wealth of knowledge, decision-making ability, and dedication of the following individuals made the Chautauqua County Greenway Plan possible. Chautauqua County Gregory J. Edwards ........................................................... County Executive Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development William Daly ...................................................................................... Director Mark Geise ........................................................................... Deputy Director Christine Kinn .........................................................................Senior Planner Don McCord ............................................................................Senior Planner Jeffrey Diers .............................................................Watershed Coordinator Debbie Liliestedt
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Montgomery County LWRP Final Plan
    MID-MON TGOMERY COUN TY LOCAL WATERFRON T REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF G LEN V ILLAGE OF FULTON VILLE TOWN OF M OHAWK V ILLAGE OF FON D A This document was prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. MID – MONTGOMERY COUNTY LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM Prepared for the: Town of Glen Village of Fultonville Town of Mohawk Village of Fonda FINAL PLAN FEBRUARY 19, 2009 This document was prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Consulting services provided by Laberge Group Laberge Group Project Number 27045 Acknowledgments The Towns of Glen and Mohawk and the Villages of Fultonville and Fonda would like to recognize and thank the many people and organizations whose assistance has made the completion of this Waterfront Revitalization Program a reality. First and foremost, the communities would like to thank the New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources for guiding the planning process and financing it with an Environmental Protection Fund - Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Grant. The communities would also specifically like to thank the following individuals: Waterfront Revitalization Advisory Committee John B. Thomas, Town of Glen Supervisor Robert Headwell Jr., Village of Fultonville Mayor Edward Patton, Town of Mohawk Supervisor Rodney Simonds, Village of Fonda Mayor Sharon Leighton, New York State Canal Corporation Fred Miller, Executive Director, Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor Commission Deborah Auspelmyer, Executive Director, Montgomery County Chamber of Commerce Tony Bruno, Montgomery County Lions Club Kevin Millington, New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources Ken Rose, Director of Montgomery County Economic Development and Planning Doug Greene, Senior Planner/Project Coordinator, Montgomery County Economic Development and Planning Town of Glen Town Board John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Meeting of the Town Board
    Tn Brd Mtg 3-4-2020 MEETING OF THE TOWN BOARD TOWN OF GLENVILLE MARCH 4, 2020 AT THE GLENVILLE MUNICIPAL CENTER 18 GLENRIDGE ROAD, GLENVILLE, NEW YORK Supervisor Koetzle called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM; Supervisor Koetzle asked the Town Clerk, Linda C. Neals, to call the roll. Present: Supervisor Christopher A. Koetzle, Councilmen, James M. Martin, Michael Aragosa, Michael R. Godlewski and Councilwoman Gina M. Wierzbowski Absent: None Also present were Earl T. Redding, Attorney for the Town; Jason Cuthbert, Comptroller and Melissa Cherubino, Director of Community Development and Vicki Hillis, Director of Human Services Town Council Reports: Councilman Godlewski – “There is a fund raiser tomorrow night at Wolf Hollow from 5:30 to 7:30 for Scotia Relief. Scotia Relief helps families in need. It was a great event last year.” Councilwoman Wierzbowski – “I attended the most recent meeting of the Glenville Town Chiefs Association last week. It was at Beukendaal Fire Department. It was great to meet a lot of the new officers that were sworn in at the recent banquets that they had. There was a lot of good discussion. Two events that I found out about that I would like to share with everyone here are Saturday morning the Alplaus Fire Department Explorer Post is having a pancake breakfast from 8:00 AM to 11:00 AM at the firehouse and the Beukendaal Fire Department’s Ladies Auxiliary on Sacandaga Road is going to be having their Annual Soups On.” Councilman Martin – “I attended the agenda meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission last Monday evening just to make a connection between the two boards and to convey our support for what they do and our appreciation for all of their volunteer effort.
    [Show full text]
  • West Hill &West End Revitalization Plan
    WEST HILL & WEST END REVITALIZATION PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS - DRAFT Working Document Submitted to the City of Albany July 21st, 2016 DRAFT ReImagine West Hill / West End T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 3 SECTION 1.1 - SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .................................................................................................... 5 Section 1.1.1 - Neighborhood Economic Development Existing Conditions ........................................ 5 Section 1.1.2 - Housing Existing Conditions .......................................................................................... 6 Section 1.1.3 - Transportation & Mobility Existing Conditions ............................................................. 7 Section 1.1.4 - Environment & Community Life Existing Conditions .................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 9 SECTION 2.1 - STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................... 9 SECTION 2.2 - DATA SOURCES .................................................................................................................. 9 SECTION 2.3 - STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................. 10 SECTION 2.4 - MARKET ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Charging Station Plan
    h Capital District Electric Vehicle Charging Station Plan PREPARED BY: IN COLLABORATION WITH: WITH SUPPORT FROM: March 2016 III Capital District Electric Vehicle Charging Station Plan NOTICE This report was prepared by Capital District Clean Communities and Energetics Incorporated in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no representation that the use of any product, apparatus, process, method, or other information will not infringe privately owned rights and will assume no liability for any loss, injury, or damage resulting from, or occurring in connection with, the use of information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. NYSERDA makes every effort to provide accurate information about copyright owners and related matters in the reports we publish. Contractors are responsible for determining and satisfying copyright or other use restrictions regarding the content of reports that they write, in compliance with NYSERDA’s policies and federal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee-Finger Lakes Historic Transportation Gateway Inventory and Assessment August 2009
    Genesee-Finger Lakes Historic Transportation Gateway Inventory and Assessment August 2009 Genesee-Finger Lakes Historic Transportation Gateway Inventory and Assessment August 2009 Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 50 West Main Street • Suite 8107 Rochester, NY 14614 (585) 454-0190 http://www.gflrpc.org [email protected] Financial assistance for the preparation of this report was provided in part by the Federal Highway Administration. Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council is solely responsible for its content and the views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Mission Statement The Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council (G/FLRPC) will identify, define, and inform its member counties of issues and opportunities critical to the physical, economic, and social health of the region. G/FLRPC provides forums for discussion, debate, and consensus building, and develops and implements a focused action plan with clearly defined outcomes, which include programs, personnel, and funding. Genesee-Finger Lakes Historic Transportation Gateway Inventory and Assessment August 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………….....V 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 1.1 Survey Team ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. CONDUCTING THE SURVEY ............................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Onondaga County Planning Board February 05, 2020 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK
    Onondaga County Planning Board February 05, 2020 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK I. ATTENDANCE MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT GUESTS PRESENT Daniel Cupoli Dan Kwasnowski James Corbett Megan Costa Marty Masterpole Allison Bodine Jim Stelter Robin Coon Marty Voss II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 11:00 AM on February 05, 2020. III. MINUTES & OTHER BUSINESS Minutes from January 15, 2020 were submitted for approval. Marty Voss made a motion to accept the minutes. Marty Masterpole seconded the motion. the votes were recorded as follows: Daniel Cupoli - yes; James Corbett - yes; Marty Masterpole - yes; Jim Stelter - yes; Marty Voss - yes. IV. ACTIONS ON GML SECTION 239 REFERRALS Summary S-20-3 TVanPB No Position S-20-4 TManPB No Position S-20-5 VFayPB No Position With Comment Z-20-13 CSyrZA No Position Z-20-14 CSyrZA No Position With Comment Z-20-15 CSyrPB No Position Z-20-16 CSyrPB No Position Z-20-17 TManTB No Position With Comment Z-20-18 TManTB No Position With Comment Z-20-19 TManPB Modification Z-20-20 TCamTB No Position With Comment Z-20-21 TCamPB No Position With Comment Z-20-22 TCamPB No Position With Comment Z-20-23 TClaPB Modification Z-20-24 CSyrZA No Position Z-20-25 TGedPB No Position Z-20-26 VFayPB Modification Z-20-27 VFayZBA No Position With Comment Z-20-28 TCamTB No Position With Comment Z-20-29 TVanZBA Modification Z-20-30 TLafPB Modification Z-20-31 TClaZBA No Position With Comment Z-20-32 TVanPB Modification Onondaga County
    [Show full text]
  • NY5 Bus Rapid Transit Conceptual Design Study
    NY5 Bus Rapid Transit Conceptual Design Study Executive Summary Washington Broadway Veeder/Nott Steuben McClellan N. Robinson Lawnwood Balltown New Karner Village of Colonie Colonie Center Colvin N. Allen N. Manning Quail Lexington Lark S. Swan Pearl SUNY NewNew YorkYork StateState RouteRoute 55 OverviewOverview For over a century, New York State Route 5 has been one of the main travel corridors in the Capital District. Anchored by the two cities of Albany and Schenectady, the arrow-straight route running 16.5 miles from northwest to southeast has served bicyclists, pedestrians, horsecars, streetcars, automobiles, buses, and trucks. In the post-war era, the character of NY 5 changed, reflecting shifts in employment, land use, transportation modes, and lifestyles. While still a critical transit corridor, with about 10,000 riders per day on CDTA’s buses, most of the roadway is dominated by automobiles, whether in terms of traffic flow, pavement space, or automobile-related land use, making the corridor less attractive Downtown Schenectady - NY5 at Broadway to a more diverse set of uses. Retail redevelopment has occurred in certain places in the corridor, such as at Colonie Center, but other segments of the corridor have lagged economically and need revitalization. Schenectady Troy GE ECD87 NY5 at McClellan St in Schenectady Plant Niskayuna N e ECD890 w 890 Y o rk R O U TE Colonie 87 5 NY5 at Wolf Rd in Colonie 90 90ECD d R d r R e lf rn o a Colonie W K Colonie w Who initiated the NY 5 e Village N Center Study? CDTC began the NY 5 Study in 1998 with the We stern NYSDOT, CDTA, and the Ave State five corridor communities Campus (the Cities of Albany and 90 r Schenectady, the Towns of e Albany iv NY5 east of Colvin Ave in Albany Colonie and Niskayuna and R n o the Village of Colonie) to State s d evaluate land use and u Capitol H transportation issues along Central Avenue and State Street.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.7 Town of Dewitt
    SECTION 9.7: TOWN OF DEWITT 9.7 TOWN OF DEWITT This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of DeWitt. A.) HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Eugene J. Conway, Chief of Police Brian Maxwell, Highway Superintendant 5400 Butternut Drive, E. Syracuse, NY 13057 5400 Butternut Drive, E. Syracuse, NY 13057 (315) 449-3640 (315) 437-8331 [email protected] [email protected] B.) TOWN PROFILE Population 24,403 (estimated 2007 U.S. Census) Location The Town of DeWitt is in east-central Onondaga County, immediately east of the City of Syracuse. The town is a suburb of Syracuse. It is also bordered by the Towns of Cicero to the north, Salina and Onondaga to the east, Lafayette and Pompey to the south, and Manlius to the east. The Village of East Syracuse is wholly within the boundaries of DeWitt. The Town is the site of most of the campus and all of the academic buildings of Le Moyne College. The northern portion of the Town is developed with a mixture of industrial, commercial and residential sections; and the central portion of the Town is primarily residential. The southern, hilly portion of the Town is generally mixed forests and fields with limited residential development and stone quarry operation. The major streams in the Town are Ley Creek and Butternut Creek. Interstate 481 is the major highway in DeWitt crossing the center of the Town, turning northward along the east side of DeWitt. I-481 intersects Interstate 690 in the eastern part of the Town and Interstate 90 (New York State Thruway) in the northern part of the Town.
    [Show full text]
  • (STIP) for REGION 02
    ** NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ** Thursday, September 2, 2021 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP) Page 1 of 44 for REGION 02 AGENCY PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOTAL 4-YEAR PROGRAM (FFY) FUND SOURCES FFY 4-YEAR PHASE Starting October 01, 2019 PIN PROGRAM FFY FFY FFY FFY in millions 2020 2021 2022 2023 AQ CODE COUNTY TOTAL PROJECT COST of dollars NYSDOT ROUTE 10A OVER CAROGA CREEK BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, TOWN OF STBG-OFF 2020 0.002 ROWINCD 0.002 CAROGA, FULTON COUNTY NFA 2020 0.001 ROWINCD 0.001 200302 STBG-OFF 2020 0.157 DETLDES 0.157 NFA 2020 0.039 DETLDES 0.039 STBG-OFF 2020 0.007 ROWACQU 0.007 NFA 2020 0.002 ROWACQU 0.002 STBG-OFF 2021 0.300 CONINSP 0.300 NFA 2021 0.075 CONINSP 0.075 STBG-OFF 2021 1.840 CONST 1.840 NFA 2021 0.460 CONST 0.460 NFA 2020 0.001 ROWINCD 0.001 STBG-OFF 2020 0.112 PRELDES 0.112 NFA 2020 0.028 PRELDES 0.028 STBG-OFF 2020 0.056 SCOPING 0.056 NFA 2020 0.014 SCOPING 0.014 AQC:N/A FULTON TPC : $2-$4 M TOTAL 4YR COST : 3.094 0.419 2.675 0.000 0.000 NYSDOT THIS PROJECT WILL REPLACE THE STATE ROUTE 51 BRIDGE OVER NHPP 2021 0.264 DETLDES 0.264 STEELE CREEK IN THE VILLAGE OF ILION, HERKIMER COUNTY. STATE NFA 2021 0.066 DETLDES 0.066 200412 ROUTE 51 IS THE PRIMARY NORTH-SOUTH ROUTE THROUGH THE NHPP 2021 0.257 ROWACQU 0.257 VILLAGE OF HERKIMER.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Public Record for Eminent Domain Public Hearing—April 19
    NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in accordance with Eminent Domain Procedure Law §202, a public hearing will be held virtually via WebEx at 5:00 p.m. on the 19th day of April, 2021, or as soon thereafter as possible, to consider the proposed acquisition, by eminent domain, of portions of a properties identified as Map 8, Parcel 10 (Tax Map ID# 328.008-1-20) (Permenent Easement) and Map 8, Parcel 11 (Tax Map ID# 328.008-1-20) (Fee Title) on the Oneida County Acquisition Map. The purpose of this hearing will be to inform the public, to consider the need and location of the proposed acquisitions, to review the public use to be served, and to assess the impact of the acquisitions on the environment and the residents prior to acquisition of those properties. The acquisition of these properties by the County of Oneida will be for the public purpose of reconstructing Middle Settlement Road in the Town of New Hartford. Persons may appear at the hearing virtually themselves or by agent and will be given the opportunity to present oral or written statements and to submit other documents or information concerning the proposed acquisition. The meeting will be hosted from the Oneida County Office Building, 800 Park Avenue in the City of Utica, but due to the COVID-19 pandemic, physical attendance is not allowed pursuant to Governor Cuomo’s Executive Order 202.15, as continued by 202.29, 202.39, 202.49, 202.55, 202.60, 202.67, 202.72, 202.79, 202.87, 202.92, 202.93, 202.94, 202.95 and 202.99.
    [Show full text]
  • River Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Albany, New York Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2017)
    River Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Albany, New York Small Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2017) Summary Description Proposed Project: Bus Rapid Transit 16.0 Miles, 30 Stations Total Capital Cost ($YOE): $40.88 Million Section 5309 Small Starts Share ($YOE): $32.70 Million (80.0%) Annual Operating Cost (opening year 2020): $2.95 Million Existing Corridor Ridership (Warranted): 10,500 Daily Linked Trips Overall Project Rating: Medium Project Justification Rating: Medium Local Financial Commitment Rating: Medium Project Description: The Capital District Transportation Authority (CDTA) proposes to implement bus rapid transit (BRT) along the Hudson River connecting Waterford in the north to Downtown Albany in the south via Troy, Watervliet, and Menands. The project includes uniquely branded buses and stations, transit signal priority, replacement of 10 traffic signals, queue bypass lanes in three locations, real-time bus arrival information, and construction of two park and ride facilities. CDTA anticipates purchasing 20 vehicles and expanding an existing maintenance and storage facility to accommodate the additional vehicles. The project is planned to intersect with the existing BusPlus Red Line BRT that connects the downtowns of Albany and Schenectady via New York State Route 5. Project Purpose: The project is intended to provide faster, more direct, and more reliable north‐south transit service connecting major activity centers and accommodating an increasing ridership along the River Corridor. The project is also intended to improve existing pedestrian access at station locations by providing safer crossings for pedestrians and transit riders. Project Development History, Status and Next Steps: CDTA selected a locally preferred alternative and had it added to the financially constrained long range plan in September 2014.
    [Show full text]