DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 Comprehensive Development Plan for the Town of Niskayuna, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 Comprehensive Development Plan for the Town of Niskayuna, New York Plan – 2013 Comprehensive Development Plan For the Town of Niskayuna, New York TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations Page 2 Introduction Page 4 Acknowledgements Page 10 The Plan Neighborhood Narratives Page 12 Issue Areas Transportation Page 21 Recreational Facilities and Open Space Preservation Page 35 Public Facilities and Utilities Page 59 Economic Development Page 73 Land Use Page 86 Historical and Cultural Preservation Page 119 Appendix List of Tables Page 126 References Page 126 Safe Routes Map Page 127 1 | Page ABBREVIATIONS ADD Average Daily Demands ARB Architectural Review Board BID Business Improvement District CDTA Capital District Transportation Authority CDTC Capital District Transportation Committee CDRPC Capital District Regional Planning Commission CIP Capital Improvements Plant DEC Department of Environmental Conservation Dept. Department e.g. as an example GIS Geographic Information System GE General Electric I/I Inflow & Infiltration JCC Jewish Community Center KAPL Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory LIP Landowner Incentive Program MGD Millions Gallon per Day MHBHT Mohawk Hudson Bike-Hike Trail MS4s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems NCSD Niskayuna Central School District NYS New York State NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation OPWDD Office of Persons with Developmental Disabilities psi Pounds per Square Inch PUD Planned Unit Development Rt. Route SEQR State Environmental Quality Review TCOD Town Center Overlay District TDR Transfer Development Rights TSR Troy Schenectady Road USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service WTP Water Treatment Plant WWTP Waste Water Treatment Plant ZBA Zoning Board of Appeals 2 | Page Plan 2013 Overview 3 | Page INTRODUCTION This Comprehensive Plan provides a roadmap that sets out broad goals and objectives for the immediate and future preservation of valued community characteristics, while allowing for the enhancement of smart and sustainable growth. This is accomplished by maintaining an appropriate balance between residential and commercial needs. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan is that it will serve as a long range guide for the Town's development and preservation policies that affect land use decisions and community growth patterns over the next ten years. As the Town Board, Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, and professional staff of the Town are confronted with questions of land development, this Plan provides the contextual and technical foundation to guide the outcome of both the incremental and intentional effects of their decisions. Finally, the Comprehensive Plan represents a snapshot of the Town at a particular time and should not be viewed as a static, but rather as a dynamic, policy instrument to be modified as needed to reflect changing conditions. Niskayuna and the greater Capital District have undergone considerable changes over the past 10 to 20 years and early in the planning process the Committee felt it was important to purposely depart from Plan 2003, rather than update it: essentially starting, at least initially, with a fresh sheet of paper. Although the current Plan represents a departure from Plan 2003, it maintains an appropriate level of continuity with earlier comprehensive plans (see Table 1), relying on historic town wide land use and development patterns as its foundation. In addition, recognizing that Niskayuna is a diverse community, committee members examined the Town with both a local neighborhood and a townwide view when identifying community strengths and needs. Throughout the planning process, the committee worked to insure that goals, objectives, recommendations, and implementation tasks, made herein, reflect Niskayuna's diverse attributes. The Town of Niskayuna is a suburban community located in the easterly portion of Schenectady County adjacent to the City of Schenectady. There are several reasons why the 21,781 residents chose to make Niskayuna their home. One reason often stated is the reputation of the Niskayuna School District. The 2010 census shows that about 34% percent of the households in Niskayuna have children under 18, while 66% do not. This statistic suggests there are other, equally important factors that make Niskayuna an attractive place to live. This supposition is supported by a recent survey conducted by the Comprehensive Plan Committee, which revealed several Town characteristics or ‘livability factors’ that convince people to pay a premium to live in the Town (Niskayuna has among the highest property values in the Capital District). Some of the livability factors cited in the survey include the Town's: parks, open spaces and natural areas, walking and bike paths, traditional tree lined neighborhoods, historic areas, and easily accessible and diverse shopping areas. In particular, residents cited Niskayuna's ‘Main Street’ retail areas located on upper Union Street and in the Town Center Overlay District (Nott Street and Balltown Road). Residents also appreciate the level of services and the variety of recreation options offered by the Town. Finally, Town residents benefit from the regional road network which allows them to 4 | Page conveniently take advantage of cultural, recreational and employment opportunities throughout the Capital District. The Comprehensive Plan strives to preserve and build-on these 'livability factors' that give Niskayuna its identity. Preservation of community character not only has wide support from residents, its preservation makes economic sense, as 'quality of life' is one of the things that most employers are looking for when relocating a business operation. The Plan also recognizes that as Niskayuna reaches full build-out, development pressures on the remaining undeveloped land parcels will likely intensify and it is likely that the Town's previous growth patterns will change. With this view in mind, the Plan attempts to position Niskayuna to take advantage of future opportunities as they arise by encouraging beneficial growth patterns that strengthen the Town's character and build its economic base. More specifically, the Comprehensive Plan sets out to: • Encourage housing development of various types, sizes, and costs to meet the needs of people at various stages of the life cycle, income, age levels, and household compositions. New development should not compromise the integrity of the surrounding neighborhoods. Moreover, to insure that the viability of Niskayuna's traditional neighborhoods is maintained, encourage exterior maintenance, renovations, and/or additions, to existing housing stock that are congruent with and appropriately scaled to fit the existing house style and age. Such actions should harmonize with the surrounding streetscape and maintain the neighborhood's cohesive character. • Ensure an adequate open space and recreation system composed of publicly accessible active and passive opportunities is established, and that it accommodates the future needs of Niskayuna residents. Enable Niskayuna to build on its existing system by positioning the Town to take advantage of open space opportunities as they arise; thereby, enabling the Town to realize the long term goals and objectives of an open space and recreation plan. Ensure that Niskayuna's open space recreation plan recognizes the important role open space plays in the character of individual neighborhoods and the Town identity. • Ensure that Niskayuna's current transportation system which includes streets, roads, sidewalks, and multiuse path facilities is safe and provides convenient circulation around the Town. Future additions and improvements to the transportation system should provide a balance of connectivity options that reflect the increasing importance of pedestrian and bike transportation modes. In addition, future transportation system improvements should minimize impacts to existing neighborhoods. • Preserve and maintain the valuable historic, cultural, architectural, and archaeological heritage of Niskayuna for the benefit of present and future residents. 5 | Page • Strengthen Niskayuna's waterfront connection with the Mohawk River by developing strategies and policies that build on and complement Niskayuna's historic relationship with the barge canal, provide appropriate recreation, residential, and business opportunities. • Maintain and strengthen Niskayuna's existing diverse commercial and retail economic area's such that they complement one another and maintain Niskayuna's fiscal base. Preserve and strengthen the 'Main Street' character of the Upper Union and Town Center Overlay Districts by encouraging attractive, compact, pedestrian friendly, retail areas that are convenient for Town residents. Promote economic opportunities for residents by recognizing that technology is changing the nature of home based businesses. Protect residential neighborhoods from commercial, industrial, and office encroachment. • Encourage the Town to promote Climate Smart development strategies. To accomplish these goals the Comprehensive Plan is divided into 7 sections, these include: • Neighborhood Narratives • Transportation • Recreational Facilities and Open Space Preservation • Public Facilities • Economic Development • Land Use • Historical and Cultural Preservation These sections establish the framework for the formulation of goals, objectives and implementation tasks found in the Plan. Goals are broad policy statements for future Town development. Objectives are more refined, designed to address specific issues. Implementation tasks are just that -- specific actions intended
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chautauqua County
    CHAUTAUQUA Greenway Plan COUNTY April 2012 A four season destination for outdoor active living, nurtured by public/private partnerships. Prepared by Pashek Associates in cooperation with Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development “It is a wholesome and necessary thing for us to turn again to the earth and in the contemplation of her beauties to know of wonder and humility. - Rachel Carson” Photo Credit: Mark Geise All of the photographs in this document were taken at various locations throughout Chautauqua County. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A special thank you goes out to the citizens and organizations of Chautauqua County for their enthusiasm and input during this study. Also, the time commitment, wealth of knowledge, decision-making ability, and dedication of the following individuals made the Chautauqua County Greenway Plan possible. Chautauqua County Gregory J. Edwards ........................................................... County Executive Chautauqua County Department of Planning & Economic Development William Daly ...................................................................................... Director Mark Geise ........................................................................... Deputy Director Christine Kinn .........................................................................Senior Planner Don McCord ............................................................................Senior Planner Jeffrey Diers .............................................................Watershed Coordinator Debbie Liliestedt
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Montgomery County LWRP Final Plan
    MID-MON TGOMERY COUN TY LOCAL WATERFRON T REVITALIZATION PROGRAM TOWN OF G LEN V ILLAGE OF FULTON VILLE TOWN OF M OHAWK V ILLAGE OF FON D A This document was prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. MID – MONTGOMERY COUNTY LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM Prepared for the: Town of Glen Village of Fultonville Town of Mohawk Village of Fonda FINAL PLAN FEBRUARY 19, 2009 This document was prepared for the New York State Department of State with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Consulting services provided by Laberge Group Laberge Group Project Number 27045 Acknowledgments The Towns of Glen and Mohawk and the Villages of Fultonville and Fonda would like to recognize and thank the many people and organizations whose assistance has made the completion of this Waterfront Revitalization Program a reality. First and foremost, the communities would like to thank the New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources for guiding the planning process and financing it with an Environmental Protection Fund - Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Grant. The communities would also specifically like to thank the following individuals: Waterfront Revitalization Advisory Committee John B. Thomas, Town of Glen Supervisor Robert Headwell Jr., Village of Fultonville Mayor Edward Patton, Town of Mohawk Supervisor Rodney Simonds, Village of Fonda Mayor Sharon Leighton, New York State Canal Corporation Fred Miller, Executive Director, Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor Commission Deborah Auspelmyer, Executive Director, Montgomery County Chamber of Commerce Tony Bruno, Montgomery County Lions Club Kevin Millington, New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources Ken Rose, Director of Montgomery County Economic Development and Planning Doug Greene, Senior Planner/Project Coordinator, Montgomery County Economic Development and Planning Town of Glen Town Board John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Meeting of the Town Board
    Tn Brd Mtg 3-4-2020 MEETING OF THE TOWN BOARD TOWN OF GLENVILLE MARCH 4, 2020 AT THE GLENVILLE MUNICIPAL CENTER 18 GLENRIDGE ROAD, GLENVILLE, NEW YORK Supervisor Koetzle called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM; Supervisor Koetzle asked the Town Clerk, Linda C. Neals, to call the roll. Present: Supervisor Christopher A. Koetzle, Councilmen, James M. Martin, Michael Aragosa, Michael R. Godlewski and Councilwoman Gina M. Wierzbowski Absent: None Also present were Earl T. Redding, Attorney for the Town; Jason Cuthbert, Comptroller and Melissa Cherubino, Director of Community Development and Vicki Hillis, Director of Human Services Town Council Reports: Councilman Godlewski – “There is a fund raiser tomorrow night at Wolf Hollow from 5:30 to 7:30 for Scotia Relief. Scotia Relief helps families in need. It was a great event last year.” Councilwoman Wierzbowski – “I attended the most recent meeting of the Glenville Town Chiefs Association last week. It was at Beukendaal Fire Department. It was great to meet a lot of the new officers that were sworn in at the recent banquets that they had. There was a lot of good discussion. Two events that I found out about that I would like to share with everyone here are Saturday morning the Alplaus Fire Department Explorer Post is having a pancake breakfast from 8:00 AM to 11:00 AM at the firehouse and the Beukendaal Fire Department’s Ladies Auxiliary on Sacandaga Road is going to be having their Annual Soups On.” Councilman Martin – “I attended the agenda meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission last Monday evening just to make a connection between the two boards and to convey our support for what they do and our appreciation for all of their volunteer effort.
    [Show full text]
  • West Hill &West End Revitalization Plan
    WEST HILL & WEST END REVITALIZATION PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS - DRAFT Working Document Submitted to the City of Albany July 21st, 2016 DRAFT ReImagine West Hill / West End T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 3 SECTION 1.1 - SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .................................................................................................... 5 Section 1.1.1 - Neighborhood Economic Development Existing Conditions ........................................ 5 Section 1.1.2 - Housing Existing Conditions .......................................................................................... 6 Section 1.1.3 - Transportation & Mobility Existing Conditions ............................................................. 7 Section 1.1.4 - Environment & Community Life Existing Conditions .................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2: METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 9 SECTION 2.1 - STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................... 9 SECTION 2.2 - DATA SOURCES .................................................................................................................. 9 SECTION 2.3 - STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................. 10 SECTION 2.4 - MARKET ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Charging Station Plan
    h Capital District Electric Vehicle Charging Station Plan PREPARED BY: IN COLLABORATION WITH: WITH SUPPORT FROM: March 2016 III Capital District Electric Vehicle Charging Station Plan NOTICE This report was prepared by Capital District Clean Communities and Energetics Incorporated in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no representation that the use of any product, apparatus, process, method, or other information will not infringe privately owned rights and will assume no liability for any loss, injury, or damage resulting from, or occurring in connection with, the use of information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. NYSERDA makes every effort to provide accurate information about copyright owners and related matters in the reports we publish. Contractors are responsible for determining and satisfying copyright or other use restrictions regarding the content of reports that they write, in compliance with NYSERDA’s policies and federal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Dormitory Authority of the State of New York
    NEW ISSUE (See “Ratings” herein) $224,875,000 DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK SCHOOL DISTRICTS REVENUE BOND FINANCING PROGRAM REVENUE BONDS $124,120,000 $22,065,000 $27,530,000 $39,840,000 $11,320,000 SERIES 2012A SERIES 2012B SERIES 2012C SERIES 2012D SERIES 2012E Dated: Date of Delivery Due: As shown on the inside cover Payment and Security: The School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A (the “Series 2012A Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012B (the “Series 2012B Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012C (the “Series 2012C Bonds”), the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012D (the “Series 2012D Bonds”), and the School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bonds, Series 2012E (the “Series 2012E Bonds” and, together with the Series 2012A Bonds, the Series 2012B Bonds, the Series 2012C Bonds and the Series 2012D Bonds, the “Series 2012 Bonds”), will be special obligations of the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (the “Authority”), payable solely from and secured by a pledge of payments to be made by certain School Districts (collectively, the “School Districts”) in the State of New York (the “State”) pursuant to the Financing Agreements (collectively the “Agreements”), dated as of April 1, 2012, between the Authority and such School Districts, and all funds and accounts (except the Arbitrage Rebate Fund) authorized under the Authority’s Master School Districts Revenue Bond Financing Program Revenue Bond Resolution adopted May 29, 2002, as amended and supplemented (the “Master Resolution”), and established by the Authority’s Series Resolutions, adopted September 21, 2011, authorizing such Series (individually, the “Series 2012A Resolution,” the “Series 2012B Resolution,” the “Series 2012C Resolution”, the “Series 2012D Resolution,” and the “Series 2012E Resolution” and, together, the “Series 2012 Resolutions”).
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee-Finger Lakes Historic Transportation Gateway Inventory and Assessment August 2009
    Genesee-Finger Lakes Historic Transportation Gateway Inventory and Assessment August 2009 Genesee-Finger Lakes Historic Transportation Gateway Inventory and Assessment August 2009 Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council 50 West Main Street • Suite 8107 Rochester, NY 14614 (585) 454-0190 http://www.gflrpc.org [email protected] Financial assistance for the preparation of this report was provided in part by the Federal Highway Administration. Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council is solely responsible for its content and the views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Mission Statement The Genesee/Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council (G/FLRPC) will identify, define, and inform its member counties of issues and opportunities critical to the physical, economic, and social health of the region. G/FLRPC provides forums for discussion, debate, and consensus building, and develops and implements a focused action plan with clearly defined outcomes, which include programs, personnel, and funding. Genesee-Finger Lakes Historic Transportation Gateway Inventory and Assessment August 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………….....V 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................1 1.1 Survey Team ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. CONDUCTING THE SURVEY ............................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Onondaga County Planning Board February 05, 2020 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK
    Onondaga County Planning Board February 05, 2020 SYRACUSE-ONONDAGA COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY CONFERENCE ROOM, 1100 CIVIC CENTER 421 MONTGOMERY STREET SYRACUSE, NEW YORK I. ATTENDANCE MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT GUESTS PRESENT Daniel Cupoli Dan Kwasnowski James Corbett Megan Costa Marty Masterpole Allison Bodine Jim Stelter Robin Coon Marty Voss II. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 11:00 AM on February 05, 2020. III. MINUTES & OTHER BUSINESS Minutes from January 15, 2020 were submitted for approval. Marty Voss made a motion to accept the minutes. Marty Masterpole seconded the motion. the votes were recorded as follows: Daniel Cupoli - yes; James Corbett - yes; Marty Masterpole - yes; Jim Stelter - yes; Marty Voss - yes. IV. ACTIONS ON GML SECTION 239 REFERRALS Summary S-20-3 TVanPB No Position S-20-4 TManPB No Position S-20-5 VFayPB No Position With Comment Z-20-13 CSyrZA No Position Z-20-14 CSyrZA No Position With Comment Z-20-15 CSyrPB No Position Z-20-16 CSyrPB No Position Z-20-17 TManTB No Position With Comment Z-20-18 TManTB No Position With Comment Z-20-19 TManPB Modification Z-20-20 TCamTB No Position With Comment Z-20-21 TCamPB No Position With Comment Z-20-22 TCamPB No Position With Comment Z-20-23 TClaPB Modification Z-20-24 CSyrZA No Position Z-20-25 TGedPB No Position Z-20-26 VFayPB Modification Z-20-27 VFayZBA No Position With Comment Z-20-28 TCamTB No Position With Comment Z-20-29 TVanZBA Modification Z-20-30 TLafPB Modification Z-20-31 TClaZBA No Position With Comment Z-20-32 TVanPB Modification Onondaga County
    [Show full text]
  • NY5 Bus Rapid Transit Conceptual Design Study
    NY5 Bus Rapid Transit Conceptual Design Study Executive Summary Washington Broadway Veeder/Nott Steuben McClellan N. Robinson Lawnwood Balltown New Karner Village of Colonie Colonie Center Colvin N. Allen N. Manning Quail Lexington Lark S. Swan Pearl SUNY NewNew YorkYork StateState RouteRoute 55 OverviewOverview For over a century, New York State Route 5 has been one of the main travel corridors in the Capital District. Anchored by the two cities of Albany and Schenectady, the arrow-straight route running 16.5 miles from northwest to southeast has served bicyclists, pedestrians, horsecars, streetcars, automobiles, buses, and trucks. In the post-war era, the character of NY 5 changed, reflecting shifts in employment, land use, transportation modes, and lifestyles. While still a critical transit corridor, with about 10,000 riders per day on CDTA’s buses, most of the roadway is dominated by automobiles, whether in terms of traffic flow, pavement space, or automobile-related land use, making the corridor less attractive Downtown Schenectady - NY5 at Broadway to a more diverse set of uses. Retail redevelopment has occurred in certain places in the corridor, such as at Colonie Center, but other segments of the corridor have lagged economically and need revitalization. Schenectady Troy GE ECD87 NY5 at McClellan St in Schenectady Plant Niskayuna N e ECD890 w 890 Y o rk R O U TE Colonie 87 5 NY5 at Wolf Rd in Colonie 90 90ECD d R d r R e lf rn o a Colonie W K Colonie w Who initiated the NY 5 e Village N Center Study? CDTC began the NY 5 Study in 1998 with the We stern NYSDOT, CDTA, and the Ave State five corridor communities Campus (the Cities of Albany and 90 r Schenectady, the Towns of e Albany iv NY5 east of Colvin Ave in Albany Colonie and Niskayuna and R n o the Village of Colonie) to State s d evaluate land use and u Capitol H transportation issues along Central Avenue and State Street.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.7 Town of Dewitt
    SECTION 9.7: TOWN OF DEWITT 9.7 TOWN OF DEWITT This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Town of DeWitt. A.) HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Eugene J. Conway, Chief of Police Brian Maxwell, Highway Superintendant 5400 Butternut Drive, E. Syracuse, NY 13057 5400 Butternut Drive, E. Syracuse, NY 13057 (315) 449-3640 (315) 437-8331 [email protected] [email protected] B.) TOWN PROFILE Population 24,403 (estimated 2007 U.S. Census) Location The Town of DeWitt is in east-central Onondaga County, immediately east of the City of Syracuse. The town is a suburb of Syracuse. It is also bordered by the Towns of Cicero to the north, Salina and Onondaga to the east, Lafayette and Pompey to the south, and Manlius to the east. The Village of East Syracuse is wholly within the boundaries of DeWitt. The Town is the site of most of the campus and all of the academic buildings of Le Moyne College. The northern portion of the Town is developed with a mixture of industrial, commercial and residential sections; and the central portion of the Town is primarily residential. The southern, hilly portion of the Town is generally mixed forests and fields with limited residential development and stone quarry operation. The major streams in the Town are Ley Creek and Butternut Creek. Interstate 481 is the major highway in DeWitt crossing the center of the Town, turning northward along the east side of DeWitt. I-481 intersects Interstate 690 in the eastern part of the Town and Interstate 90 (New York State Thruway) in the northern part of the Town.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Plan for Grassland Birds in New York
    A Plan for Conserving Grassland Birds in New York: Final Report to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation under contract #C005137 Michael Morgan and Michael Burger Audubon New York 10 June 2008 Audubon New York 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd. Ithaca, NY 14850 (607) 254-2487 or [email protected] 1 Support The funding for the planning process and the creation of this document, which describes the foundation for grassland bird conservation in New York and provides direction for future efforts, has been provided by a contract from the Department of Environmental Conservation (C005137). Funds for the contract originated as a Tier 1 grant from the USFWS State Wildlife Grants Program. Many partnering agencies are contributing to the coordinated grassland bird conservation effort in New York, and are listed as partners in this plan. The following individuals have either contributed to the development of various components of the plan, or supported its development through review of draft materials or participation in discussions, and this support is greatly appreciated. Thanks to Jeff Bolsinger, Chris Dobony, Peter Gibbs, Mitch Hartley, Paul Hess, Sheila Hess, Tom Jasikoff, Heidi Kennedy, Chris Lajewski, Mike Murphy, Paul Novak, Dave Odell, Ray Perry, Tim Post, Marcelo del Puerto, Chris Reidy, Ron Rohrbaugh, Ken Rosenberg, Paul Salon, Carl Schwartz, Shanna Shaw, Gerry Smith, Bryan Swift, Mike Townsend, and Maiken Winter, among others. Our apologies to anyone that we’ve failed to mention. 2 Executive Summary • Grassland birds have been declining faster than any other habitat-species suite in the northeastern United States. The primary cause of these declines is abandonment of agricultural lands, causing habitat loss due to reversion to later successional stages or due to sprawl development.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Real Thing
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Exploring the Real Thing A Guide to Educational Programs at National Park Sites in New York and New Jersey www.nps.gov/ERT Exploring the Real Thing A Guide to Educational Programs at National Park Sites in New York and New Jersey www.nps.gov/ERT Exploring the Real Thing A Guide to Educational Programs at National Park Sites in New York and New Jersey www.nps.gov/ERT Acknowledgements Exploring the Real Thing New York and New Jersey was developed with input and funding from National Parks in New York and New Jersey, and with funding from the Recreational Fee Demonstration Funds. It is the third in a series of guides that highlight the educational services offered by the National Park Service. The first was published for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 1999; the second was published for the Commonwealth of Virginia in 2001. New York and New jersey Project Team Kathy Tevyaw, Northeast Center for Education Services; Elizabeth Hoermann, Nortlieast Center for Education Services; Maryanne Gerbauckas, Edison National Historical Park; Catherine Weber, CW Consulting Group Special Thanks To all New York and New Jersey Educators who have supported the development of National Park Service programs. Design Higgins & Ross The Project Team would like to recognize the National Park Foundation for ongoing support of the Parks as Classrooms programs, the many teachers who helped develop Parks as Classrooms programs, and park staff and partners who work daily to preserve and interpret park resources
    [Show full text]