DOCSLIB.ORG

International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Second Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Second Edition THE INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY, SECOND EDITION The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Second Edition Edited by Michael R. Redclift Professor of International Environmental Policy, King’s College, University of London, UK Graham Woodgate Senior Lecturer in Environmental Sociology, Institute for the Study of the Americas, School of Advanced Study, University of London, UK Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK • Northampton, MA, USA © Michael R. Redclift and Graham Woodgate 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by Edward Elgar Publishing Limited The Lypiatts 15 Lansdown Road Cheltenham Glos GL50 2JA UK Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. William Pratt House 9 Dewey Court Northampton Massachusetts 01060 USA A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Control Number: 2009938391 ISBN 978 1 84844 088 3 (cased) Printed and bound by MPG Books Group, UK 02 Contents List of fi gures vii List of tables and boxes viii List of contributors ix Introduction 1 Graham Woodgate PART I CONCEPTS AND THEORIES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY Editorial commentary 11 Graham Woodgate 1 The maturation and diversifi cation of environmental sociology: from constructivism and realism to agnosticism and pragmatism 15 Riley E. Dunlap 2 Social institutions and environmental change 33 Frederick H. Buttel 3 From environmental sociology to global ecosociology: the Dunlap–Buttel debates 48 Jean- Guy Vaillancourt 4 Ecological modernization as a social theory of environmental reform 63 Arthur P.J. Mol 5 Ecological modernization theory: theoretical and empirical challenges 77 Richard York, Eugene A. Rosa and Thomas Dietz 6 Postconstructivist political ecologies 91 Arturo Escobar 7 Marx’s ecology and its historical signifi cance 106 John Bellamy Foster 8 The transition out of carbon dependence: the crises of environment and markets 121 Michael R. Redclift 9 Socio- ecological agency: from ‘human exceptionalism’ to coping with ‘exceptional’ global environmental change 136 David Manuel- Navarrete and Christine N. Buzinde 10 Ecological debt: an integrating concept for socio- environmental change 150 Iñaki Barcena Hinojal and Rosa Lago Aurrekoetxea 11 The emergence model of environment and society 164 John Hannigan 12 Peering into the abyss: environment, research and absurdity in the ‘age of stupid’ 179 Raymond L. Bryant v vi Contents PART II SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY Editorial commentary 191 Graham Woodgate 13 Animals and us 197 Ted Benton 14 Science and the environment in the twenty- fi rst century 212 Steven Yearley 15 New challenges for twenty- fi rst- century environmental movements: agricultural biotechnology and nanotechnology 226 Maria Kousis 16 Sustainable consumption: developments, considerations and new directions 245 Emma D. Hinton and Michael K. Goodman 17 Globalization, convergence and the Euro- Atlantic development model 262 Wolfgang Sachs 18 Environmental hazards and human disasters 276 Raymond Murphy 19 Structural obstacles to an eff ective post- 2012 global climate agreement: why social structure matters and how addressing it can help break the impasse 292 Bradley C. Parks and J. Timmons Roberts 20 Environmental sociology and international forestry: historical overview and future directions 311 Bianca Ambrose- Oji PART III INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIETY Editorial commentary 329 Graham Woodgate 21 The role of place in the margins of space 334 David Manuel- Navarrete and Michael R. Redclift 22 Society, environment and development in Africa 349 William M. Adams 23 Neoliberal regimes of environmental governance: climate change, biodiversity and agriculture in Australia 364 Stewart Lockie 24 Environmental reform in modernizing China 378 Arthur P.J. Mol 25 Civic engagement in environmental governance in Central and Eastern Europe 394 JoAnn Carmin 26 A ‘sustaining conservation’ for Mexico? 408 Nora Haenn Index 427 Figures 10.1 Calculating ecological debt 152 21.1 Cancun and the Quintana Roo Coast, Mexico 340 24.1 Chinese government environmental investments, 1990–2007 381 24.2 Governmental staff employed for environmental protection in China, 1991–2007 383 24.3 Environmental complaints by letters, visits and hotlines to EPBs, 1991–2006 385 vii Tables and boxes Tables 10.1 A comparison of ecological debt: Canada and Bangladesh 153 24.1 Environmental fi nes in China, 2001–06 383 Box 10.1 Elements for quantifying ecological debt 152 viii Contributors William M. Adams is Moran Professor of Conservation and Development in the Depart- ment of Geography at University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. [email protected]. Bianca Ambrose- Oji was Research Fellow at CAZS- Natural Resources, College of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, UK. [email protected] Iñaki Barcena Hinojal is Professor of Political Science and Director of the Department of Political Science and Administration at the University of the Basque Country, Euskadi. [email protected] Ted Benton is Professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Essex, UK. [email protected] Raymond L. Bryant is Professor of Political Ecology in the Department of Geography at King’s College, University of London. [email protected] Frederick H. Buttel (1948–2005) had a distinguished research and teaching career that took him to Michigan State University, Ohio State University, Cornell University and University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA. On his death, the International Sociological Association established in his honour the Frederick H. Buttel International Award for Distinguished Scholarship in Environmental Sociology. Christine N. Buzinde, Department of Recreation, Park and Tourism Management, Penn State University, USA. [email protected] JoAnn Carmin is Associate Professor of Environmental Policy and Planning in the Department of Urban Studies and Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. [email protected] Thomas Dietz is Assistant Vice President for Environmental Research, Director of the Environmental Science and Policy Program, and Professor of Sociology and Crop and Soil Sciences at Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. [email protected] Riley E. Dunlap is Regents Professor of Sociology at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA and Past-President of the International Sociological Association’s Research Committee on Environment and Society (RC 24). [email protected] Arturo Escobar is Kenan Distinguished Teaching Professor of Anthropology in the Department of Anthropology at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA. [email protected] ix x Contributors John Bellamy Foster is Professor in the Sociology Department at the University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA and editor of Monthly Review. [email protected] Michael K. Goodman is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Geography at King’s College, University of London, UK. [email protected] Nora Haenn is Associate Professor of Anthropology and International Studies at North Carolina State University, USA. [email protected] John Hannigan is Professor of Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Canada. [email protected] Emma D. Hinton is a PhD candidate in the Department of Geography at King’s College, University of London, UK. [email protected] Maria Kousis is Professor in Sociology of Development and Environment at the University of Crete, Gallos Campus, Rethymno, Greece. [email protected] Rosa Lago Aurrekoetxea is a Lecturer in the Department of Electronics and Telecom- munications of the University of the Basque Country, Euskadi. [email protected] Stewart Lockie is Professor of Sociology in the Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University. His recent research has addressed the incorporation of environmental and social values within agricultural commodity chains, the application of market-based instruments to environmental problems, the social impacts of mining and infrastructure development, and intimate partner violence in rural and regional communities. Professor Lockie is co-author of Going Organic: Mobilising Networks for Environmentally Responsible Food Production (CABI, 2006) and co-editor of Agriculture, Biodiversity and Markets: Agroecology and Livelihoods in Comparative Perspective (Earthscan, 2009). David Manuel- Navarrete, Department of Geography, King’s College, University of London, UK. [email protected]. Arthur P.J. Mol is Chair and Professor of Environmental Policy within the Department of Social Sciences at Wageningen University, the Netherlands and Professor of Environmental Policy within the School of Environment and Natural Resources at Renmin University, Beijing, China. [email protected] Raymond Murphy is Emeritus Professor of Sociology at the University of Ottawa, Canada, and author of Leadership in Disaster: Learning for a Future with Global Climate Change (McGill- Queen’s University Press, 2009). [email protected] Bradley C. Parks is a PhD candidate at the London School of Economics and Political Science and a Research Fellow at the College of William and Mary’s Institute of the Theory and Practice of International Relations, Williamsburg, VA, USA. [email protected] Contributors xi Michael R. Redclift is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Running Head: ECOLOGICALLY UNEQUAL EXCHANGE & FDI
    Running Head: ECOLOGICALLY UNEQUAL EXCHANGE & FDI Ecologically Unequal Exchange and the Environmental Effects of FDI: Empirical Analyses of Emissions and Consumption in Developing Countries, 1997-2007 Sho Kawashima Wartburg College ECOLOGICALLY UNEQUAL EXCHANGE & FDI 2 Abstract With the current increasing trends of economic liberalization and globalization, the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) has grown substantially over the past three decades. Along with rapid economic development, FDI is often considered to have brought serious environmental consequences to host developing countries. Ecologically unequal exchange theorists argue that the disproportionate export flow of energy and materials from developing to developed countries allows developed countries to improve their environment and increase their consumption of environmental resources, while deteriorating the environment of developing countries and suppressing their levels of environmental consumption. This article presents empirical analyses of ecologically unequal exchange hypotheses, which postulate that the higher the level of FDI intensity, the higher the level of CO2 emissions and the lower the level of environmental consumption within developing countries. To test the hypotheses, the total CO2 emissions and per capita ecological footprint in 1999, 2003, and 2007 were regressed (OLS) on the estimated models consisting of the levels of FDI intensity and other factors supposedly responsible for the respective forms of environmental outcomes. With the results being
    [Show full text]
  • Human Ecology Review
    HUMAN ECOLOGY REVIEW Volume 22, Number 1, 2015 RESEARCH AND THEORY IN HUMAN ECOLOGY Introduction: Progress in Structural Human Ecology 3 Thomas Dietz and Andrew K. Jorgenson Metatheorizing Structural Human Ecology at the Dawn of the Third Millennium 13 Thomas J. Burns and Thomas K. Rudel Animals, Capital and Sustainability 35 Thomas Dietz and Richard York How Does Information Communication Technology Affect Energy Use? 55 Stefano B. Longo and Richard York Environmental Sustainability: The Ecological Footprint in West Africa 73 Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt Income Inequality and Residential Carbon Emissions in the United States: A Preliminary Analysis 93 Andrew K. Jorgenson, Juliet B. Schor, Xiaorui Huang and Jared Fitzgerald Urbanization, Slums, and the Carbon Intensity of Well-being: Implications for Sustainable Development 107 Jennifer E. Givens Water, Sanitation, and Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Cross-national Analysis of Maternal and Neo-natal Mortality 129 Jamie M. Sommer, John M. Shandra, Michael Restivo and Carolyn Coburn Contributors to this Issue 153 Research and Theory in Human Ecology 1 Introduction: Progress in Structural Human Ecology Thomas Dietz1 Environmental Science and Policy Program, Department of Sociology and Animal Studies Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States Andrew K. Jorgenson Department of Sociology, Environmental Studies Program, Boston College, Boston, United States Abstract Structural human ecology is a vibrant area of theoretically grounded research that examines the interplay between structure and agency in human– environment interactions. This special issue consists of papers that highlight recent advances in the tradition. Here, the guest co-editors provide a short background discussion of structural human ecology, and offer brief summaries of the papers included in the collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Soils a Resource Through Microbial Labor
    This is a repository copy of Nonhuman labor and the making of resources: making soils a resource through microbial labor. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/152381/ Version: Published Version Article: Krzywoszynska, A. orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-0440 (2020) Nonhuman labor and the making of resources: making soils a resource through microbial labor. Environmental Humanities, 12 (1). pp. 227-249. ISSN 2201-1919 https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-8142319 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Nonhuman Labor and the Making of Resources Making Soils a Resource through Microbial Labor ANNA KRZYWOSZYNSKA Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, UK Abstract With soils increasingly seen as living ecosystems, the understanding of the rela- tionship between soils and agricultural labor is changing. A shift from working the soil to working with the soil is hoped to deliver a true ecological modernization of capitalist agri- culture, making the production of ever-growing yields and the maintenance of healthy eco- systems co-constitutive.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Development and Ecological Footprint: a Global Panel Data Analysis
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Majeed, Muhammad Tariq; Mazhar, Maria Article Financial development and ecological footprint: A global panel data analysis Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS) Provided in Cooperation with: Johar Education Society, Pakistan (JESPK) Suggested Citation: Majeed, Muhammad Tariq; Mazhar, Maria (2019) : Financial development and ecological footprint: A global panel data analysis, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), ISSN 2309-8619, Johar Education Society, Pakistan (JESPK), Lahore, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, pp. 487-514 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/201002 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ www.econstor.eu Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 2019, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, PUBLIC RELATIONS and CRISES of DEMOCRACY and ECOLOGY by Simon John En
    THE POTEMKIN CORPORATION: CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, PUBLIC RELATIONS AND CRISES OF DEMOCRACY AND ECOLOGY by Simon John Enoch BA HONS, University of Regina MA, McMaster University A dissertation presented to Ryerson University and York University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Ryerson University/York University Joint Graduate Programme in Communication and Culture Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2009 © Simon John Enoch, 2009 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-58998-4 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-58998-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization, Unequal Ecological Exchange, and Climate Justice: the Case of Turkey and the European Union
    1 GLOBALIZATION, UNEQUAL ECOLOGICAL EXCHANGE, AND CLIMATE JUSTICE: THE CASE OF TURKEY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION A dissertation presented by Lora Karaoğlu to The Department of Sociology and Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Sociology Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts December 2011 2 GLOBALIZATION, UNEQUAL ECOLOGICAL EXCHANGE, AND CLIMATE JUSTICE: THE CASE OF TURKEY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION by Lora Karaoğlu ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate School of Northeastern University December, 2011 3 ABSTRACT Analyses of physical trade flows over the last decade reveal that the global South is running ever higher physical trade deficits. These deficits are being magnified by the increased export of both resource-intensive and pollution-intensive commodities onto the world market. A primary aim of this dissertation is to empirically demonstrate support for the theory of unequal ecological exchange in the case of Turkey and the European Union. This research undertakes three levels of analysis: cross-national, national, and local. The dissertation attempts to answer the following questions: To what extent have Turkey’s natural resources been appropriated at the global level through the process of unequal ecological exchange? What are the economic and political conditions that give rise to unequal ecological exchange? To what extent is unequal ecological exchange occurring between Turkey and the EU? What are the socio-ecological impacts of unequal ecological exchange in the Köprülü Canyon and its buffer zones? Answers to these questions are derived from both quantitative (physical accounting and regression analyses) and qualitative methods (20 semi-structured interviews and previous research results from my unpublished MA thesis), relying heavily on long-time data series analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cross- National Panel Study of Ict Deve
    INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING: A CROSS- NATIONAL PANEL STUDY OF ICT DEVELOPMENT ON CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS 1990-2009 By JOSEPH MICHAEL SIMPSON Bachelor of Science in Sociology Cameron University Lawton, Oklahoma 2005 Master of Science in Sociology Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2008 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December, 2013 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING: A CROSS- NATIONAL PANEL STUDY OF ICT DEVELOPMENT ON CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS 1990-2009 Dissertation Approved: Dr. Riley E. Dunlap Dissertation Committee Chair Dr. Andrew Fullerton Dissertation Advisor Dr. Beth Caniglia Dr. David Knottnerus Dr. Jacqueline Vadjunec ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my two dissertation advisors. Dr. Riley Dunlap, I would not have succeeded without your guidance and mentorship, not just as my advisor but also as my teacher, colleague, and friend. I am proud to call myself an Environmental Sociologist and I have you to thank for that. Dr. Andrew Fullerton, I would not have been able to do the quantitative analysis without your excellent class, continued collaboration, and friendship. Thank you to the rest of the committee. Dr. Beth Caniglia, you were there to give me advice when I was not sure what direction to take or where to turn. Dr. David Knottnerus, you helped mentor me into to the sociologist I am today, any deep understanding of social structure I have I owe to you. Dr. Jacqueline Vadjunec, thank you for participating in this journey with me.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Through the Lens of Environmental Sociology: an Introduction
    sustainability Editorial Sustainability through the Lens of Environmental Sociology: An Introduction Md Saidul Islam Division of Sociology, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 14 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637332, Singapore; [email protected]; Tel.: +65-6592-1519 Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen Received: 10 March 2017; Accepted: 15 March 2017; Published: 22 March 2017 Abstract: Our planet is undergoing radical environmental and social changes. Sustainability has now been put into question by, for example, our consumption patterns, loss of biodiversity, depletion of resources, and exploitative power relations. With apparent ecological and social limits to globalization and development, current levels of consumption are known to be unsustainable, inequitable, and inaccessible to the majority of humans. Understanding and achieving sustainability is a crucial matter at a time when our planet is in peril—environmentally, economically, socially, and politically. Since its official inception in the 1970s, environmental sociology has provided a powerful lens to understanding the challenges, possibilities, and modes of sustainability. This editorial, accompanying the Special Issue on “sustainability through the Lens of Environmental Sociology”, first highlights the evolution of environmental sociology as a distinct field of inquiry, focusing on how it addresses the environmental challenges of our time. It then adumbrates the rich theoretical traditions of environmental sociology, and finally examines sustainability through the lens of environmental sociology, referring to various case studies and empirical analyses. Keywords: environmentalism; environmental sociology; ecological modernization; treadmill of production; the earth day; green movement; environmental certification; global agro-food system 1. Introduction: Environmental Sociology as a Field of Inquiry Environmental sociology is the study of how social and ecological systems interact with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Community and Environmental Sociology 1
    Community and Environmental Sociology 1 COMMUNITY AND DEGREES/MAJORS/CERTIFICATES • Community and Environmental Sociology, B.S. (http:// ENVIRONMENTAL guide.wisc.edu/undergraduate/agricultural-life-sciences/community- environmental-sociology/community-environmental-sociology-bs/) SOCIOLOGY • Food Systems, Certificate (http://guide.wisc.edu/undergraduate/ agricultural-life-sciences/community-environmental-sociology/food- Sociologists study human social behavior and how societies are systems-certificate/) organized. The Department of Community and Environmental Sociology’s focus is on the relationship between people and their natural environment and with the communities in which people live, work, and play. PEOPLE A major in Community and Environmental Sociology is good preparation for jobs that involve an understanding of social issues, require knowledge PROFESSORS of the functioning and organization of communities and the relationship Michael Bell (chair), Katherine Curtis, Nan Enstad, Randy Stoecker between people and the natural environment, and involve data collection or data analysis. Community and Environmental Sociology graduates ASSOCIATE PROFESSORS may be employed in nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that Samer Alatout, Noah Feinstein, Monica White focus on a number of issues surrounding community development, environment, and advocacy, governmental planning or social service ASSISTANT PROFESSORS agencies, agricultural or environmental organizations, and cooperative Josh Garoon, Sarah Rios or agribusiness enterprises. A major in Community and Environmental Sociology also provides excellent preparation for careers in international EMERITUS PROFESSORS development, law, and further academic work in sociology or other social Jane Collins, Glenn Fuguitt, Jess Gilbert, Gary Green, Tom Heberlein, sciences. Daniel Kleinman, Jack Kloppenburg, Gene Summers, Leann Tigges, Paul Voss The Department of Community and Environmental Sociology offers a wide range of courses for both beginning and advanced students.
    [Show full text]
  • Externalities: Why Environmental Sociology Should Bring Them In
    Environmental Sociology ISSN: (Print) 2325-1042 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rens20 Externalities: why environmental sociology should bring them in Malcolm Fairbrother To cite this article: Malcolm Fairbrother (2016) Externalities: why environmental sociology should bring them in, Environmental Sociology, 2:4, 375-384, DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2016.1196636 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1196636 © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa View supplementary material UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 29 Sep 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 5646 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 8 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rens20 Environmental Sociology, 2016 Vol. 2, No. 4, 375–384, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1196636 Externalities: why environmental sociology should bring them in Malcolm Fairbrother* School of Geographical Sciences and Cabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK (Received 15 January 2016; accepted 30 May 2016) The concept of externalities represents the core of environmental economics but appears much less in sociology and other social sciences. This article presents the concept of externalities and makes a case for its usefulness, noting reasons why environmental sociologists should like it and use it more than they do currently. The concept is closely tied to theories – of why environmental problems occur and how they can be addressed – which contradict influential perspectives in environ- mental sociology. But an externalities-centred approach to environmental issues is nonetheless highly sociological and consistent with current research in other subfields.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Speaks for the Future of Earth? How Critical Social Science Can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Global Environmental Change. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J. et al. (2015) Who speaks for the future of Earth?: how critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 32: 211-218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-43841 Global Environmental Change 32 (2015) 211–218 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Environmental Change jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gloenvcha Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene a, b c d a e Eva Lo¨vbrand *, Silke Beck , Jason Chilvers , Tim Forsyth , Johan Hedre´n , Mike Hulme , f g Rolf Lidskog , Eleftheria Vasileiadou a Department of Thematic Studies – Environmental Change, Linko¨ping University, 58183 Linko¨ping, Sweden b Department of Environmental Politics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany c School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK d Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK e Department of Geography, King’s College London, K4L.07, King’s Building, Strand Campus, London WC2R 2LS, UK f Environmental Sociology Section, O¨rebro University, 701 82 O¨rebro, Sweden g Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Modernization As Social Theory F.H
    Geoforum 31 (2000) 57±65 www.elsevier.com/locate/geoforum Ecological modernization as social theory F.H. Buttel Department of Rural Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1450 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA Received 5 November 1998; in revised form 12 August 1999 Abstract In this paper I examine some of the reasons for and implications of the ascendance of ecological modernization thought. I stress that its rapid rise to prominence is not because it is a well-developed and highly-codi®ed social theory, but rather because it accords particularly well with a number of intellectual and broader political±economic factors, many of which lie outside the realms of sociology and environmental sociology. I suggest that while ecological modernization is indistinct as a social theory its basic logic suggests two points. First, the most sophisticated versions of ecological modernization revolve around the notion that political processes and practices are particularly critical in enabling ecological phenomena to be `` Ômoved intoÕ the modernization process'' (Mol, A.P.J., 1995. The Re®nement of Production. Van Arkel, Utrecht, p. 28). Thus, a full-blown theory of ecological modern- ization must ultimately be a theory of politics and the state. Second, the logic of ecological modernization theory suggests that it has very close anities to several related literatures ± particularly embedded autonomy, civil society, and state-society synergy theories in political sociology ± which have not yet been incorporated into the ecological modernization literature. I conclude by arguing that ecological modernization can bene®t by bringing these related ± and, for that matter, more powerful ± theories into its fold.
    [Show full text]