Doing Philosophy in a Messy World by Asking Inconvenient Questions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Doing Philosophy in a Messy World by Asking Inconvenient Questions prof.dr. C. Dutilh Novaes THE HUMAN FACTOR: DOING PHILOSOPHY IN A MESSY WORLD BY ASKING INCONVENIENT QUESTIONS VUA-242010-nl-NL-0519-1 1 14-05-2019 12:42:52 prof.dr. C. Dutilh Novaes THE HUMAN FACTOR: DOING PHILOSOPHY IN A MESSY WORLD BY ASKING INCONVENIENT QUESTIONS Rede uitgesproken bij de aanvaarding van het ambt van hoogleraar VU-University Research Chair Reasoning and Argumentation and their History, aan de Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen van de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam op 17 mei 2019. VUA-242010-nl-NL-0519-1 3 14-05-2019 12:42:52 The Human Factor: doing philosophy in a messy world by asking inconvenient questions 1. Introduction When she was about 7 years old, my daughter Marie liked to read very short informative books called ‘informatieboekjes’, which she borrowed from the library. These were age- appropriate short introductions to all kinds of topics, which she read avidly. (I was quite surprised when she came home with one on juvenile detention centers, but she assured me it was very interesting.) Inevitably, at some point she found the ‘informatieboekje’ on philosophy, and so she could finally learn more about that thing that kept her mother so busy. After she read the book, the following conversation ensued: -“So Marie, what is philosophy?” -“Philosophy is about asking lots of questions, and when you get answers you ask even more questions.” (Touché…) -“And what else did you learn in the book?” -“There was also the story of a man in Greece who walked around asking everyone all kinds of questions, and eventually people got angry at him and he had to die.” inconvenient So you see, asking questions can be dangerous, especially if they are questions. Good philosophical questions are always inconvenient, as they are meant to unsettle. Indeed, the same ‘informatieboekje’ has a definition of philosophy that I still use when I give lectures to prospective students: “Filosoferen is vragen stellen bij dingen die gewoon lijken, maar die eigenlijk helemaal niet zo vanzelfsprekend zijn.” “To philosophize is to ask questions about things that seem normal, but which are actually not obvious at all.” Philosophical questions are meant to dislodge and defy common sense; they force us to see the non-obvious in what appears unproblematic. We think we know what time is, but do we really? How come I am the same person now as I was 10 years ago (presumably!), given that all the molecules that composed me then have now been replaced by different ones? Can we be sure that we are not living in the Matrix? No wonder that Socrates, the irritating gadfly, ended up irking the good people of Athens: philosophy is at heart a subversive enterprise. 2. Paradoxes paradoxes Some of the most powerful tools at the philosopher’s disposal to expose the non- para doxa obviousness of what superficially seems straightforward are argument. Etymologically, a paradox is what is distinct from ( ) common opinion ( ). But the philosophically more interesting way to define a paradox in my opinion is as an where the premises seem acceptable (true), the reasoning from premises to conclusion seems acceptable (correct), and yet the conclusion seems unacceptable (false). But how can this 1 be? Something must be amiss somewhere! The typical attitude of philosophers when confronted with paradoxes is well captured in the following passage by philosopher M. Sainsbury: Appearances have to deceive, since the acceptable cannot lead by acceptable steps to the unacceptable. So, generally, we have a choice: either the conclusion is not really unacceptable, or else the starting point, or the reasoning, has some non-obvious flaw. In other words, when we encounter a paradox, this is usually interpreted as a sign that something has to go, and there are three main options: one of the premises is not acceptable (true) after all; one of the steps in the reasoning is not acceptable (correct) after all; the is conclusion is not unacceptable (false) after all. (A fourth option, which horrifies most philosophers, is that it possible for the acceptable to lead to the unacceptable by acceptable steps. This possibility would entail that discursive rationality is not a reliable guide to draw sound conclusions, a scary thought indeed. But there have been thinkers who recognized and even embraced the folly of discursive rationality.) No matter which way we go given these three options, we are forced to revise at least some of the beliefs and opinions we entertained so far: despite initial appearances, maybe one of the premises is false after all; or maybe the reasoning is not correct after all; or maybe (and this tends to be the least popular but also most the exciting option) the conclusion is not that crazy after all. Either way, a paradox shows that three of our beliefs (that the premises are true, that the reasoning is correct, that the conclusion is false) are mutually incompatible, and forces us to make choices in order to restore peace. Notice that the mutually inconsistent beliefs were there all along, doing no harm, but once the paradox brings the inconsistency to the fore, some cognitive reorganization is required. The principle of minimal effort dictates that the revision should be as minimal as possible, and indeed philosophers often discuss which of the three options would do the least ‘damage’, the presupposition being that the least revisionist option is to be preferred. But sometimes, paradoxes can lead to startling discoveries. By embracing the implausible conclusion of Galileo’s paradox—that the collection of all natural numbers is of the same size (has the same cardinality, to use the right jargon) as the collection of all perfect square numbers—the mathematician Georg Cantor created (or discovered, as the jury is still out on the ontological status of mathematical entities) a whole new mathematical world, that of the transfinite numbers, and thus inaugurated set theory. More recently, a number of philosophers have argued that the Liar paradox—is the sentence ‘This sentence is not true’ true or false?—shows that some sentences can be both true and false, unsettling millennia of Aristotelian orthodoxy (but embracing a worldview presented by the Buddhist 2 nd rd philosopher Nagarjuna in the 2 and 3 centuries AD). These strange, disconcerting ideas again show us that many things are not nearly as simple as they seem. Paradoxes can also be a lot of fun. The grandfather paradox, for example, where a time- traveller goes back to the past to kill his grandfather, is a great conversation piece for dinner parties, aside from raising deeper questions about the nature of time. When she was 7 years old (which is apparently peak age for wisdom, at least for my children), my daughter Sophie came up with a paradox of her own. The starting point is what in Dutch is known as the ‘upside down world game’ (omgekeerde wereld) and in English goes by ‘opposite day game’. The game basically functions as a truth-value flipping operator: if you say yes, you mean no, and if you say no, you mean yes. Sophie then noted that if someone not asks you ‘are you playing upside down world?’, all kinds of strange things happen to each of are the answers you may give. If you are playing upside down world, you will say no; but if you playing upside down world you will also say no. So the ‘no’ answer is not informative, but still coherent. As for the ‘yes’ answer, if you are playing upside down world and say ‘yes’, then that means ‘no’, and so you are not playing the game after all. But then your ‘yes’ was a genuine yes in the first place, and so you are playing the game and said yes, which takes us back to the beginning. Still with me? Probably not… Never mind! Sophie’s own assessment of the situation was that the question ‘are you playing upside down world?’, which is prima facie perfectly normal and innocent, turns out to be a really difficult, if not impossible, question to answer. Who would have thought? 3. Philosophy as situated and social Let us go back to philosophy being about asking lots of questions. The focus on questions highlights another fundamental feature of doing philosophy (and in fact arguably of any intellectual enterprise): philosophy is essentially a collective, social endeavor. Asking questions and offering answers is obviously quintessentially a dialogical practice; though one can of course engage in solitary thinking, this is arguably the internalization (to use a terminology introduced by the Soviet psychologist Lev Vygotsky) of a social practice initially learned in the public sphere. This too is an old idea, again going back at least to Plato’s notion of thought as inner speech, and more recently developed in detail by cognitive linguists under the concept of ‘fictive interaction’. It entails that, while it is of course possible to philosophize on your own, like Descartes by his fireplace, solitary philosophizing is not paradigmatic. But one need not go as far as Socrates, who was suspicious of all forms of writing, and conclude that true thinking could only happen by means of actual dialogical interactions, involving physical participants. Dialogue can also occur through other media, writing in particular (which, in the day and age of whatsapp and social media, is almost a trivial observation). Indeed, the very history of philosophy across the centuries can be viewed as 3 different authors engaging in dialogues with their contemporaries as well as with philosophers of the past through their writings. However, for those of us who in fact like to talk, there’s no better way to do philosophy than to engage in actual conversations, be they in the classroom with students, at seminars with colleagues, or informally with philosophically inclined friends.
Recommended publications
  • Graham Greene's Work in the Time of the Cold
    Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích Pedagogická fakulta Katedra anglistiky Bakalářská práce Graham Greene’s Work in the Time of the Cold War Vypracoval: František Linduška Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Alice Sukdolová, Ph.D. České Budějovice 2017 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že svoji bakalářskou práci jsem vypracoval samostatně pouze s použitím pramenů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném znění souhlasím se zveřejněním své bakalářské práce, a to v nezkrácené podobě – v úpravě vzniklé vypuštěním vyznačených částí archivovaných pedagogickou fakultou elektronickou cestou ve veřejně přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jihočeskou univerzitou v Českých Budějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách, a to se zachováním mého autorského práva k odevzdanému textu této kvalifikační práce. Souhlasím dále s tím, aby toutéž elektronickou cestou byly v souladu s uvedeným ustanovením zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. zveřejněny posudky školitele a oponentů práce i záznam o průběhu a výsledku obhajoby kvalifikační práce. Rovněž souhlasím s porovnáním textu mé kvalifikační práce s databází kvalifikačních prací Theses.cz provozovanou Národním registrem vysokoškolských kvalifikačních prací a systémem na odhalování plagiátů. 11.7.2017 Podpis Poděkování Tímto bych chtěl poděkovat vedoucí této bakalářské práce PhDr. Alici Sukdolové, Ph.D. za odborné vedení, za pomoc a rady při zpracování všech údajů a v neposlední řadě i za trpělivost a ochotu, kterou mi v průběhu psaní této práce věnovala. Abstrakt Tato práce zkoumá vliv politického prostředí na tvorbu anglického prozaika Grahama Greena ve druhé polovině jeho tvůrčího života. Zaměří se na proměnu stylu psaní autora, psychologický a morální vývoj charakterů hlavních hrdinů a na celkovou charakteristiku Greenovy poetiky.
    [Show full text]
  • Graham Greene
    GRAHAM GREENE Like many writers, Greene resisted the appellation of Catholic novelist, since he did not want readers to be seeking catechetical exactitude in his stories. In what is arguably his first Catholic novel, The Power and the Glory, Graham Greene contrasts a weak, alcoholic fugitive priest with his austere pursuer. There are others contrasts in the book as well ­­ between the hunted man who cannot escape the demands of his ministry and his soft, comfortable self before the revolution; between the second nocturne tale of martyrdom read by pious children and the real life flawed candidate for the firing squad with whiskey on his breath ­­ but the basic contrast is between the political and the religious. All efforts to see the significance of human life in this­world terms are inadequate to the way it really is. Other Catholic novels are The Heart of the Matter, The End of the Affair and A Burnt­Out Case. The series comes to an end in 1973 with The Honorary Consul. Greene still had years to live and many books to write, but his imagination had switched from a religious into a political gear. The Heart of the Matter takes its motto from Charles Peguy. "At the very heart of Christianity is the sinner. No one is more competent on the matter of Christianity than the sinner ­­ unless it be the saint." Major Scobie damns himself out of pity for a waif­like war widow in colonial Africa. Greene is at his best presenting Catholicism through the medium of © Ralph McInerny, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside out Graham Greene
    Inside Out Graham Greene WORKSHEET A 1. Complete the questions below. Then ask your partner the questions and complete the text. Graham Greene was born on (1) ________ , in Berkhamsted, England. He had a difficult childhood – he was teased at school because (3) ________ . He attempted suicide on a number of occasions. His parents sent him to see (5) ________ when he was 15. His therapist encouraged him to write and introduced him to his circle of literary friends. When he was 18, Greene went to (7) ________ , where he studied modern history. He also became (9) ________ . After graduation he went to work at The Nottingham Journal. In Nottingham he met (11) ________ , who encouraged Greene to convert to Catholicism. In 1926 he became a Catholic and in 1927 he married Vivien. They had a daughter, Lucy Caroline and a son, Francis. 1 When _________________________________________________________________? 3 Why __________________________________________________________________? 5 Who __________________________________________________________________? 7 Where _________________________________________________________________? 9 What __________________________________________________________________? 11 Who __________________________________________________________________? 2. Complete the following with a/an, the or – (nothing) He began writing full time after publishing The Man Within (1925), which was (a) ___ critical and commercial success. During (b) ___ 1930s he also wrote (c) ___ film reviews, becoming one of (d) ___ most respected critics of (e) ___ time. He later did some screenwriting for (f) ___ cinema, (g) ___ most famously (h) ___ screenplay for (i) ___ film The Third Man, which won first prize at (j) ___ Cannes Film Festival in 1949. His travels in (k) ___ Mexico in 1938 and his shock at (l) ___ religious persecution he witnessed there inspired him to write The Lawless Roads (1939).
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: EROTIC TRANSGRESSION
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: EROTIC TRANSGRESSION: SEXUALITIES AND COMPANIONSHIP IN GRAHAM GREENE’S FICTION Heather Moreland McHale, Ph.D., 2011 Directed By: Professor John Auchard, Department of English This dissertation examines the role of sexuality in Graham Greene’s fiction. Instead of compartmentalizing Greene’s description of sex as an element of his Catholic perspective, this study reverses this view and argues that sexuality is at the center of Greene’s spiritual and moral life. Greene examines facets of sexuality that are often considered perverse or aberrant; his encompassing view of sexual life informs the political, moral, and religious issues of his novels. Key texts include The Man Within (1929), The End of the Affair (1951), The Quiet American (1955), Travels with My Aunt (1969), The Human Factor (1978), and Monsignor Quixote (1982), as well as selected short stories. These texts, as well as Greene’s autobiographies and travel writings, reveal a performative, polymorphous, and conflicted sexuality. The chapters of this project discuss sexuality of pain; scopophilia and exhibitionism; the role of fertility and sterility; confession and sexual talk; and the relationships between men. Ultimately, Greene’s evolving depictions of sexuality assume a central role in his work and become the most important way that his characters make meaning in a postwar, post-Eliot world. Rather than accept the view of modern life as a wasteland, Greene reinvests it with drama, danger, and existential importance through his exploration of sexuality. His interest in pain, scopophilia, adulterous or triangular relationships, and other forms of unusual sexuality simultaneously normalize these forms by suggesting that they are functional parts of erotic life, and present a radical view of what normative life really is.
    [Show full text]
  • Graham Greene
    Graham Greene: An Inventory of His Collection at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Greene, Graham1904-1991 Title: Graham Greene Collection Dates: 1924-1998 Extent: 96 boxes (40 linear feet), 7 galley folders, and 3 oversize folders Abstract: The collection consists primarily of holograph and typescript manuscripts for many of Greene's major works, personal diaries and datebooks, and correspondence. Also present are files kept by Greene's publisher Laurence Pollinger, including correspondence and records of contract negotiations. Access: Open for research Administrative Information Acquisition: Gifts and purchases, 1964-1997 Processed by: Chelsea Dinsmore, 2002 Provenance The majority of the Graham Greene manuscript materials were acquired in the early 1970s while various individual items and small groups were purchased between 1964 and 1997. The Laurence Pollinger correspondence files were obtained as part of a separate purchase in 1994. Repository: Harry Ransom Center, The University of Texas at Austin Greene, Graham 1904-1991 Biographical Sketch Born in Berkhamstead, England, in 1904, Henry Graham Green was the fourth of six children born to Charles Henry and Marion Raymond Greene. Greene led a fairly typical childhood for the time, raised largely by nurses and nannies in the nursery and spending relatively little time with his parents. His father held a position as a headmaster at the Berkhamstead School giving Graham an early taste of divided loyalties when he entered the school in 1915. At the age of sixteen Graham had a mental crisis during which he ran away from home and school. Coming on top of several questionable suicide attempts and exaggerated illnesses, his parents sent him for six months of psychoanalysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Graham Green Graham Greene a Selection
    presents Graham Greene a selection PETER HARRINGTON 100 Fulham Road London SW3 6HS Tel +44 (0)20 7591 0220 Fax +44 (0)20 7225 7054 [email protected] Browse our stock at www.peterharrington.co.uk We offer free shipping on website orders Members, ABA, ILAB, PBFA, ImCos, LAPADA 1. GREENE, Graham. Babbling April. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1925 [48448] Octavo. Original grey boards, titles to upper board and spine in blue. With the dust jacket. A superb copy in the minimally tanned dust jacket and remains of the original glassine. £6,500 First Edition, Sole Impression of the author’s first book - a collection of poems written as an undergraduate at Oxford University. Just 300 copies were printed. Rare in this condition. 2. GREENE, Graham. The Man Within. Heinemann, London, 1929 [51654] Octavo. Original black cloth, titles to spine gilt. With the dust jacket. Spine very lightly rolled but an excellent copy in the rather rubbed and somewhat tanned dust jacket with some tape residue to the verso. £2,750 First edition, first impression. Greene’s first novel, preceded only by a slim volume of poetry. 3. GREENE, Graham. The Name of Action. London: William Heinemann Ltd, 1930 [51814] Octavo. Original blue cloth, titles to spine gilt. Foxing to edges, endpapers, and title pages. A very good copy. £500 First edition, first impression. 4. GREENE, Graham. Rumour at Nightfall. London, William Heinemann Ltd., 1931 [52068] Octavo. Original red cloth, titles to spine gilt, blind stamped star motif to upper board. Slight fading to spine, a few minor marks to boards, otherwise an internally fresh, bright copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lirjell Lirjell
    LIRJELL ISSN: 2348-1617 The Story of the Marginalised in Graham Green’s Fiction Dr Meena Malik Associate Professor, NDRI Deemed University, Karnal, Haryana Graham Greene is widely acknowledged as a major British novelist who rode the crest of popularity for the greater part of twentieth century. In a successful literary career spanning over six decades, Greene wrote over twenty novels besides a number of short stories, plays, memoirs, travel books, children’s books, reviews, essays, a biography and two volumes of autobiography. It is noteworthy that out of the twenty-five novels, from The Man Within (1929) to The Captain and the Enemy (1988) produced by Graham Greene, none is gifted with a female protagonist. The fundamental fact of male domination over women could be discerned in all walks of life in almost all his novels. Women characters in his novels never take the center of the story line, although incredibly essential for understanding of the novel. It seems as if they exist simply as mere ‘corollaries’ or ‘appendages’ for the better understanding of the male hero or anti-hero. They are essentially passive creatures whose task is to illumine and motivate the dynamic character of their male counterpart. John Atkin’s book Graham Greene (1957) offers some stray but useful cues to the understanding of women characters. One can endorse Atkin’s view that women exist merely “as corollaries to men helping or hindering some vital masculine action”. 1 The women in Greene’s fiction fulfill all the necessary conditions, which make them true ‘feminine’ figures. True to the concept propounded by Mary Ellmann in her book, Thinking About Women (1968) 2, Greene’s women perfectly hold true all the eleven major stereotypes of femininity as presented by most of the male writers and critics such as formlessness, passivity, instability, confinement, piety, materiality, spirituality, irrationality, compliancy and finally ‘the two incorrigible figures’ of the witch and the shrew.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Ambiguity: Graham Greene's the Third Man and the Quiet American in Print and on Screen
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2003 History and Ambiguity: Graham Greene's The Third Man and The Quiet American in Print and on Screen. Valentina Reshetova East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Reshetova, Valentina, "History and Ambiguity: Graham Greene's The Third Man and The Quiet American in Print and on Screen." (2003). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 783. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/783 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. History and Ambiguity: Graham Greene’s The Third Man And The Quiet American In Print and On Screen _______________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of English East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in English _______________ by Valentina Reshetova August 2003 _______________ Professor Stanley, Chair Professor Giles Professor Hurd Keywords: The Third Man, The Quiet American, Novels and Films ABSTRACT History and Ambiguity: Graham Greene’s The Third Man And The Quiet American In Print and On Screen by Valentina Reshetova In this master’s thesis, I shall examine Graham Greene’s place in criticism of the British novel by focusing on The Third Man and The Quiet American.
    [Show full text]