DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pragmatics of Liturgical Discourse: with Special Reference to English Reformed Worship and the Preformative Language Doxology of Jean Ladrière

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pragmatics of Liturgical Discourse: with Special Reference to English Reformed Worship and the Preformative Language Doxology of Jean Ladrière Hilborn, D. (1994) The pragmatics of liturgical discourse: with special reference to English Reformed worship and the preformative language doxology of Jean Ladrière. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/13311/1/240679_vol1.pdf Copyright and reuse: The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. · Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. · To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in Nottingham ePrints has been checked for eligibility before being made available. · Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not- for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. · Quotations or similar reproductions must be sufficiently acknowledged. Please see our full end user licence at: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE PRAGMATICS of LITURGICAL DISCOURSE With Special Reference to English Refonned Worship and the Performative Language Doxology of Jean Ladriere By Revd. David Hilborn, BA MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, October 1994 VOLUME I Part I & Part II Chapters 5-6 BEST COpy AVAILABLE Variable print quality CONTENTS VOLUME I Abstract Preface Note on referencing PART I: TIlE ANATOMY OF LITURGICAL PRAGMATICS: METHOD, THEORY AND FIELDWORK 1 Towards a Pragmatics of Liturgy 1 1.1 Pragmatics and liturgy: grounds for association 1 1.2 Pragmatics and liturgy in the realm of semiotics 4 1.3 An integrated schema for liturgical pragmatics 7 2 Pragmatics. Language and Discourse: Methodological 11 Foundations for a New Liturgic 2.1 Definitional issues 11 2.2 Root concepts in linguistic pragmatics: 13 their relation to liturgy 2.2.1 Langue and parole 13 2.2.2 Meaning as use: language games and forms of life 15 2.2.3 Competence, performance and communicative competence 17 2.2.4 Further definitive concepts: Sentence v utterance; type v token; 22 sense v force 2.2.5 Context 24 2.3 Contemporary linguistic pragmatics: its scope and 28 application to liturgy 2.4 Pragmatics, religious language and liturgy: 43 precedents and points for development 2.4.1 General theological and philosophical studies 45 of religious language 2.4.2 Theological and philosophical applications of 52 pragmatics to religious language 2.4.3 General theological studies of liturgical language 60 2.4.4 Theological and philosophical applications of 68 pragmatics to the language of liturgy 2.4.5 Religious and liturgical language study 77 in linguistics 2.5 Confirming key needs: the refinement, synthesis 85 and extension of liturgical-pragmatic method 3 Pragmatics and Doxology: Theories of Language-Use 87 and Theologies of Worship 3.1 Doxology and pragmatic theory 87 3.2 Language-use as an issue in contemporary 91 liturgical theology 3.3 Jean Ladriere and the 'performativity' 98 of liturgical language 3.4 Implications for a Reformed liturgical pragmatics 111 4 Pragmatics and the data of liturgical performance: 132 an empirical approach to the sacral speech-event 4.1 The place and use of corpus data in pragmatics 132 4.2 The use of corpora in liturgical language study: 138 precedents and principles 4.3 Original data used in this study 147 4.3.1 Printed material: the United Reformed Church 150 Service Book (1989) 4.3.2 Field data: Advent Sunday Survey 152 4.3.2.1 Background 152 4.3.2.2 Determining the data field 154 4.3.2.3 Analytical perspective 155 4.3.2.4 Selection of participant congregations 157 4.3.2.5 Selection of services for analysis 166 4.3.2.6 Data collection procedures 168 4.3.2.6.1 Audio recording 170 4.3.2.6.2 Informant testing: questionnaire 172 4.3.2.6.3 Ethnosemantic analysis: service order chart 172 4.3.3 Transcription of field data 175 4.3.3.1 General principles 175 4.3.3.2 The 'turn' as a basic transcription unit: 177 applications to liturgical discourse 4.3.3.3 'Significant pausing' as a turn criterion: 182 distinctive patterns in Iiturgical discourse 4.3.3.4 Stress. volume. tone and pitch 193 4.3.3.5 Orthography 195 4.3.3.6 Non-transcribed material: the omission of 196 sermons. hymn texts and readings from analysis 4.3.3.7 Incorporating ethnosemantic data into 201 transcripts: the segmentation of service discourse 4.3.3.8 Extralinguistic features: the representation of 203 context 4.4 From 'anatomy' to 'operation' 205 PART ll: PRAGMATICS IN LITURGIOLOGICAL PRACTICE: THE FUNCfIONS OF REFORMED SERVICE DISCOURSE 5 The Word Performed: Liturgy and Speech Act Theory 206 5.1 Background 206 5.2 Liturgy and 'the isolation of the performative' 207 5.3 Felicity conditions and rules of use 210 in church worship 5.4 From performative/constative to 233 locution/illocution/perlocution 5.4.1 Locutions v illocutions in worship 237 5.4.2 The problem of 'explicit performatives' 249 in liturgy 5.4.3 Illocutions and perlocutions in worship 259 5.5 Illocutionary acts, illocutionary forces 265 and 'directions of fit' in liturgy 5.6 Key complications in a speech act analysis 306 of liturgy 5.6.1 Indirectness 306 5.6.2 Pragmatic ambivalence 309 5.6.2.1 Assertive Directives 311 5.6.2.2 Assertive-Commissive Directives 312 5.6.2.3 Assertive Expressives 312 5.6.2.4 Assertive-Expressive Commissives 314 5.6.2.5 Assertive Declarations 315 5.6.2.6 Assertive-Expressive Declarational Directives 316 5.6.3 'Felicity' and 'truth' in sacral discourse 318 6 The Word Communicated: Liturgy. Implicature 334 and Relevance 6.1 From speech acts to interaction 334 6.2 Implicature and liturgy 336 6.3 Liturgy in the light of relevance theory 372 VOLUME2 7 The Word Elaborated: Liturgy as Discourse 401 and Dialogue 7.1 Beyond the single speech act: liturgical 401 pragmatics as necessarily discoursal and dialogical 7.2 'Macro speech act' models and the study 408 of liturgy 7.2.1 Consequent liturgical speech acts: 417 illocutions or perlocutions? 7.2.2 Liturgy as 'conversation'?: 427 some basic distinctions 7.3 Developing a model for extended liturgical 431 speech action: from bi-lateral exchanges to multilateral, contextualised speech-events 7.4 Monological v dialogical paradigms in Reformed 453 worship: the diachronic perspective 7.4.1 The reinforcement of Calvinistic monologism 456 in English Puritan worship 7.4.2 Monologues v dialogues from 1662 to the present 466 7.5 Similarities and differences in the pragmatic 476 functions of mono logical and dialogical worship discourse 7.5.1 The analogy with drama 478 7.5.2 Liturgical discourse which might equally be 482 mono logical or dialogical 7.5.3 Liturgical discourse which is distinctively 486 mono logical or dialogical 7.5.3.1 Agreement and the dialogical status of 'Amens' 492 7.5.3.2 Further intrinsically dialogical sequences 496 in liturgy 7.5.3.2.1 Question-answer 497 7.5.3.2.2 (]reeting-greeting 505 7.5.3.2.3 Offer-acceptance 509 7.5.4 The characteristic indirectness and ambivalence 514 of liturgical adjacency pairs 7.5.5 Radical asyndeton and frequent topic-shifting 516 as generic indicators of liturgy 7.6 The pragmatic drawbacks of Reformed 523 'didactic monologism' 8 The Woni Ritualized: Liturgy as Activity Type 525 8.1 Preliminary remarks 525 8.2 Sociolinguistic paradigms for liturgical 526 pragmatics: activity types, prepatterning and the ethnography of speaking 8.2.l. Degrees of liturgical prepatterning: a hypothesis 528 8.2.l.1 Routine, convention and ritual in liturgy 532 8.3 Situational prepatterning of the church service 541 8.3.1 Sacral settings 541 8.3.2 Sacral scenes 546 8.4 Participational prepatterning: speech and 550 utterance event roles in liturgy 8.5 Teleological prepatteming: the purposed 564 ends of liturgy 8.6 Act-sequential prepaneming in worship 567 8.6.1 The fixity of message form and message content 567 in liturgy 8.6.2 Forms of speech: liturgical codes and registers 584 8.7 Prepatterned norms of sacral interaction 588 and interpretation 8.8 Generic prepatteming in the church service 592 *** 9 Conclusions 606 9.1 Overall conceptions 606 9.2 Methodological points 608 9.3 Theoretical points 617 9.4 Empirical points 621 9.5 The way ahead: Liturgical pragmatics 623 9.6 The way ahead: United Reformed Church worship 625 Appendices: Advent Sunday Survey Data 1. Churches participating in Advent Sunday Survey 628 2. Questionnaire format 629 3. Transcription Conventions 637 4. Field data: summarised questionnaire information, 639 transcripts and service order charts 4.1 Heme Hill United Reformed/Methodist Church, 640 London 4.2 Emmanuel United Reformed Church, West 656 Wickham, Kent 4.3 Thatcham United Reformed Church, Berkshire 680 4.4 Derriford United Reformed Church, Devon 697 4.5 Warsash United Reformed Church, Hampshire 727 4.6 Wheatley United Reformed Church, Oxfordshire 746 4.7 Weoley Castle Community Church (United 768 Reformed), Birmingham 4.8 Bulwell United Reformed Church, Nottingham 794 4.9 Blackford Bridge United Reformed Church, 814 Bury (Greater Manchester) 4.10 St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dell H. Hymes: His Scholarship and Legacy in Anthropology and Education
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons GSE Faculty Research Graduate School of Education 12-16-2011 Dell H. Hymes: His Scholarship and Legacy in Anthropology and Education Nancy H. Hornberger University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs Part of the Anthropological Linguistics and Sociolinguistics Commons, Educational Leadership Commons, Higher Education and Teaching Commons, Linguistic Anthropology Commons, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Hornberger, N. H. (2011). Dell H. Hymes: His Scholarship and Legacy in Anthropology and Education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 42 (4), 310-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1548-1492.2011.01141.x This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/310 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dell H. Hymes: His Scholarship and Legacy in Anthropology and Education Abstract Dell Hathaway Hymes, linguistic anthropologist and educational visionary extraordinaire, passed away in November 2009, leaving behind a voluminous scholarship and inspirational legacy in the study of language and inequality, ethnography, sociolinguistics, Native American ethnopoetics, and education. This essay provides a brief account of Hymes's life and scholarly contributions, especially his early and enduring influence in the anthropology of education; and goes on to comment briefly on this AEQ set of essays
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnography and Democracy: Hymes's Political Theory of Language
    Ethnography and democracy: Hymes’s political theory of language JAN BLOMMAERT Abstract Dell Hymes’s oeuvre was explicitly political, and this paper addresses this often overlooked dimension of his work. The project of ethnography was intended by Hymes to be a counterhegemonic and democratic science, which o¤ered voice to the subjects it studied and so created a critical social-scientific paradigm that destabilized and negated established truths by dialogically engaging with reality. This critical and counterhegemonic paradigmatic dimension of ethnography is first sketched and discussed at some length. Next, we discuss Hymes’s ethnopoetic work. In his ethnopoetic work, Hymes’s critical concern with voice, democracy, and inequality is articulated most clearly and persuasively. It is by looking at ethnopoetics that we see the blending of a methodological and a political project. Keywords: Hymes; ethnography; ethnopoetics; critique; democracy. 1. Introduction Dell Hymes’s work is, like that of Bourdieu and Bernstein, but also that of Gumperz and Go¤man, highly political. Texts such as the essay ‘‘Speech and language’’ (Hymes 1996: ch. 3), or the introductory essay to his Reinventing Anthropology (2002 [1969]) explicitly testify to that; most of his oeuvre, however, can be read as a political statement, an at- tempt toward a critical science of language in social life, toward ‘‘a union of knowledge and social values’’ (2002 [1969]: 51). Hymes would often mention his own background as an explanation for this, especially his ex- periences as a GI enlisted so as to gain access to college education under the GI Bill, and stationed in the Far East.
    [Show full text]
  • Franz Boas's Legacy of “Useful Knowledge”: the APS Archives And
    Franz Boas’s Legacy of “Useful Knowledge”: The APS Archives and the Future of Americanist Anthropology1 REGNA DARNELL Distinguished University Professor of Anthropology University of Western Ontario t is a pleasure and privilege, though also somewhat intimidating, to address the assembled membership of the American Philosophical ISociety. Like the august founders under whose portraits we assemble, Members come to hear their peers share the results of their inquiries across the full range of the sciences and arenas of public affairs to which they have contributed “useful knowledge.” Prior to the profes- sionalization of science in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the boundaries between disciplines were far less significant than they are today. Those who were not experts in particular topics could rest assured that their peers were capable of assessing both the state of knowledge in each other’s fields and the implications for society. Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington were all polymaths, covering what we now separate into several kinds of science, humanities, and social science in ways that crosscut one another and illustrate the permeability of disciplinary boundaries. The study of the American Indian is a piece of that multidisciplinary heri- tage that constituted the APS and continues to characterize its public persona. The Founding Members of the Society all had direct and seminal experience with the Indians and with the conflict between their traditional ways of life and the infringing world of settler colonialism. On the one hand, they felt justified in exploiting Native resources, as surveyors, treaty negotiators, and land speculators. On the other hand, the Indians represented the uniqueness of the Americas, of the New World that defined itself apart from the decadence of old Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE ANTHONY K. WEBSTER Department of Anthropology University of Texas at Austin SAC 4.102 2201 Speedway Stop C3200 Austin TX 78712 EDUCATION 2004 Ph.D. in Anthropology at the University of Texas at Austin. Dissertation: Navajo Poetry, Linguistic Ideology, and Identity: The Case of an Emergent Literary Tradition. Chairs: Joel F. Sherzer and Pauline Turner Strong 1997 M.A. in Anthropology, minor in Linguistics, New Mexico State University. MA Thesis: Sam Kenoi’s Coyote Stories: An Ethnopoetic analysis of some Chiricahua Apache narratives. Chair: Scott Rushforth 1993 B.A. (with Distinction) in Anthropology, minors in English Literature and Political Science at Purdue University. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2013- University of Texas at Austin. Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology. 2010-13 Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology. 2005-10 Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology. 2004-05 Wesleyan University, Andrew Mellon Postdoctoral Fellowship. 2004 Idaho State University, Visiting Assistant Professor. 2001-02 University of Massachusetts Boston, Lecturer. 1999 New Mexico State University, Summer Term College Instructor. 1 1998 New Mexico State University, Summer Term College Instructor. PUBLICATIONS AND CREATIVE WORKS Books: 2009 Explorations in Navajo poetry and poetics. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. Guest Editor, Refereed Journal: To appear Ethnopoetics, Narrative Inequality, and Voice: On the Legacy of Dell Hymes. Special Issue Journal of Folklore Research. (co-editor with Paul V. Kroskrity). (2013) 2012 Ordeals of Language: Essays in Honor of Ellen B. Basso. Special Issue Journal of Anthropological Research. (co-editor with Juan Luis Rodriguez). 68(3). 305-422. 2011 American Indian Languages in Unexpected Places.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Anthropology in 2013: Super-New-Big
    AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST Linguistic Anthropology Linguistic Anthropology in 2013: Super-New-Big Angela Reyes ABSTRACT In this essay, I discuss how linguistic anthropological scholarship in 2013 has been increasingly con- fronted by the concepts of “superdiversity,” “new media,” and “big data.” As the “super-new-big” purports to identify a contemporary moment in which we are witnessing unprecedented change, I interrogate the degree to which these concepts rely on assumptions about “reality” as natural state versus ideological production. I consider how the super-new-big invites us to scrutinize various reconceptualizations of diversity (is it super?), media (is it new?), and data (is it big?), leaving us to inevitably contemplate each concept’s implicitly invoked opposite: “regular diversity,” “old media,” and “small data.” In the section on “diversity,” I explore linguistic anthropological scholarship that examines how notions of difference continue to be entangled in projects of the nation-state, the market economy, and social inequality. In the sections on “media” and “data,” I consider how questions about what constitutes lin- guistic anthropological data and methodology are being raised and addressed by research that analyzes new and old technologies, ethnographic material, semiotic forms, scale, and ontology. I conclude by questioning the extent to which it is the super-new-big itself or the contemplation about the super-new-big that produces perceived change in the world. [linguistic anthropology, superdiversity, new media, big data,
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Kroeber Died in Paris in His Eighty- O Fifth Year, Ending Six Decades of Continuous and Brilliant Pro- Ductivity
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES A L F R E D K ROE B ER 1876—1960 A Biographical Memoir by J U L I A N H . S TEWARD Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1962 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. ALFRED LOUIS KROEBER June II, 1876-October 5, i960 BY JULIAN H. STEWARD THE LAST DAY N OCTOBER 5, i960, Alfred Kroeber died in Paris in his eighty- o fifth year, ending six decades of continuous and brilliant pro- ductivity. His professional reputation was second to none, and he was warmly respected by his colleagues as the dean of anthropology. Kroeber's insatiable curiosity had not been curtailed, his scientific writing had not slackened, and his zest for living was undiminished. His last illness, resulting from, a heart condition which had been in- curred during the Second World War, came less than an hour before his death. The fullness of Kroeber's life was manifest in many ways.1 He xFor much of the personal information, I have drawn upon several unpublished manuscripts written by Kroeber in 1958 and 1959 for the Bancroft Library: "Early Anthropology at Columbia," "Teaching Staff (at California)," and the typescript of an interview. Mrs. Kroeber has rilled me in on many details of his personal life, especially before 1925 when I first knew him, and Professor Robert Heizer has helped round out the picture in many ways. Important insights into Kroeber's childhood and youth are provided by the late Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymes's Linguistics and Ethnography in Education
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons GSE Faculty Research Graduate School of Education 1-2009 Hymes's Linguistics and Ethnography in Education Nancy H. Hornberger University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Hornberger, N. H. (2009). Hymes's Linguistics and Ethnography in Education. Text & Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 29 (3), 347-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.018 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/246 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hymes's Linguistics and Ethnography in Education Abstract Education is one of the arenas in which Hymes has brought his scholarship and politics of advocacy to bear in the world, perhaps most visibly through his University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education deanship (1975–1987), but also through the scope and depth of his writings on linguistics and ethnography in education. Language inequality is an enduring theme of Hymes's work, in relation not only to Native American ethnopoetics, narrative analysis, and linguistic socialization, but also to educational linguistics and ethnography in education. Hymes proposed a vision and a set of ways of doing educational linguistics and ethnography in education—from ethnographic monitoring and ethnography of communication to ethnopoetics of oral narrative and ethnography of language policy—that have inspired and informed researchers for a generation and more. Keywords communicative competence, educational linguistics, ethnopoetics, language inequality, language planning, linguistic socialization Disciplines Education This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/246 Hymes’s linguistics and ethnography in education* NANCY H.
    [Show full text]
  • Dell H. Hymes
    Language in Society 39, 301–305. doi:10.1017/S0047404510000229 IN MEMORIAM DELL H. HYMES Dell H. Hymes: An intellectual sketch JOEL SHERZER Department of Anthropology University of Texas Austin, TX 78712 [email protected] BARBARA JOHNSTONE AND WILLIAM MARCELLINO Rhetoric Program, Department of English Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890 [email protected], [email protected] We are all saddened by the death of Dell Hymes. Hymes was one of the leading figures in linguistic anthropology and sociolinguistics, a pioneer who took the field in many new directions. These include the study of relations between and among language, culture, and society; language and literature; the ethnography of speaking and communication; the history of anthropology and linguistics; language history and language change; the role of language in creating and reflect- ing social inequalities; and the pidginization and creolization of languages. He was the founding editor of our journal, Language in Society. Among his many books (written alone, edited alone, or edited with others) are Language in culture and society: A reader in linguistics and anthropology (Hymes 1964a), The ethnography of communication (Gumperz & Hymes 1964), Studies in Southwestern ethnolin- guistics: Meaning and history in the languages of the American Southwest (Hymes & Bittle 1967), Pidginization and creolization of languages (Hymes 1971), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (Gumperz & Hymes 1972), Functions of language in the classroom
    [Show full text]
  • History of Linguistic Anthropology - Alessandro Duranti
    LINGUISTIC ANTHROPOLOGY - History of Linguistic Anthropology - Alessandro Duranti HISTORY OF LINGUISTIC ANTHROPOLOGY Alessandro Duranti Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles Keywords: Language as culture, history of anthropology in the U.S., American Indian languages, linguistic diversity, linguistic relativity, the ethnography of communication, language socialization, indexicality, heteroglossia. Contents 1. Introduction 2. The First Paradigm: The Boasian Tradition 3. The Second Paradigm: The Ethnography of Communication and the Birth of Sociolinguistics 4. New Directions of Research: Language Socialization, Indexicality, and Heteroglossia 5. A Third Paradigm: Language as a Flux of Indexical Values 6. Conclusion Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary The field of linguistic anthropology was born in the United States and Canada at the beginning of the twentieth century as one of the four fields of North American anthropology. At first it was mainly focused on the documentation of aboriginal languages (especially in North America) and grammatical structures. Later it became more concerned with language-mediated activities and the relationship between language and context. The chapter uses Thomas Kuhn’s paradigm shift framework to discuss how goals, key concepts, units of analysis, issues, and methods have changed over the last one hundred years without necessarily replacing older paradigms. The first paradigm emerged with the pioneering work of Franz Boas on American Indian languages and continues today in the descriptive work of so-called “field linguists,” who are committedUNESCO to writing grammars – of previouslyEOLSS undocumented aboriginal languages around the world. This paradigm persists today in much of so-called cognitively oriented linguistics (and cognitive oriented anthropologists) especially with regard to their interest in language as a resource for the encoding of experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Gleanings from Academic Gatherings
    History of Anthropology Newsletter Volume 11 Issue 2 December 1984 Article 13 January 1984 Gleanings From Academic Gatherings Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation (1984) "Gleanings From Academic Gatherings," History of Anthropology Newsletter: Vol. 11 : Iss. 2 , Article 13. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol11/iss2/13 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol11/iss2/13 For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLEANINGS FROM ACADEMIC GATHERINGS Hese.:lrch Committe"" on the;, History o£ Scheduled papers o£ anthropological interest at the Munich conference o£ the RCHS <July, 1984) included: "The 'Psychologie des Peuples': An Anthropological Subdiscipline Turn o£ the Century France" <Joseph R. "kobertson Smith and James Frazer: Two in the Anthropological Study of Religion" <Bob Jones>: "Toward the History o:f Social Georges Vacher de Lapouge's Theory o£ 'Social Selections''' <Andre Be)inl. The program £or the 1984 meetings in St. Paul. Minnesota. included a paper by Katherine Spencer Halpern, Mary E. Holt, and Susan McGreevy <Wheelwright Museum, Santa Fe New entitled: "Washington Matthews: Army Surgeon and Field Anthropologist in the American West, 1843-1905". J Centennial The centenary o£ the birth o£ Edward Sapir saw two maJor symposia various aspects o£ his life and work. At the annual of the AAA, two sessions were organized by James N. Nyce <Brown>. The first, entitled "Edward Sapir's Place in the History o£ the Social Sciences," was by Geor·ge W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Dell Hymes: Ethnopoetics, Narrative Inequality
    Book Reviews 111 grown up around the assassination of JFK, the Not only does Lepselter argue her thesis in events of 9/11, and the annual meetings of scholarly terms but, in the process, she also tells world leaders known as the Bilderberg Group, a good story in a literary vein, which makes the to mention only a few. But there is a continuum book not only worthwhile for understanding in this process, in the search for solutions to an interesting aspect of American culture, but problems that are masked by conventional wis- also a pleasure to read. dom and custom: a quest that ranges from the uncanny on one end through the typical con- spiracy theory to the other end of the contin- The Legacy of Dell Hymes: Ethnopoetics, uum, where we find the valuable processes of Narrative Inequality, and Voice. Ed. Paul V. connecting dots and thinking out of the box. Kroskrity and Anthony K. Webster. (Blooming- Here, Lepselter moves her ethnographic lens to ton: Indiana University Press, 2015. Pp. 291, Rachel, Nevada, near Area 51, where she introduction, index.) worked as a waitress in order to talk to believers who came to what she calls the “geographic fo- John H. McDowell cus of the uncanny American conspiracy the- Indiana University ory” (p. 80). She ends with a coda, titled “One More What we have here is a smorgasbord of lively Thing.” Here, she tells her own story, which il- work that revisits and extends the legacy of Dell lustrates how immersion in such narratives, Hymes, that resolute Oregonian who consoli- which are supported on all sides by earnest be- dated ethnopoetics to recognize eloquent voices lievers, can color one’s perception and emotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Language in Culture Syllabus Petko Ivanov Connecticut College, [email protected]
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Slavic Studies Course Materials Slavic Studies Department 2015 Language in Culture Syllabus Petko Ivanov Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/slaviccourse Recommended Citation Ivanov, Petko, "Language in Culture Syllabus" (2015). Slavic Studies Course Materials. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/slaviccourse/1 This Course Materials is brought to you for free and open access by the Slavic Studies Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Slavic Studies Course Materials by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. C o n n e c t i c u t C o l l e g e Spring 2015 ANT/SLA 226 René Magritte This is not a pipe (1936) Language in Culture Prof. Petko Ivanov ANT 226: Language in Culture Connecticut College Spring 2015 ANT / SLA 226 Language in Culture Spring 2015, Wednesday/Friday 2:45-4:00 Olin 113 Foucault, Lacan, Lévi-Strauss, and Barthes Instructor: Petko Ivanov Blaustein 330, x5449, [email protected] Office hours W/F 1:30-2:30 and by appointment Course Description The course is an introduction to linguistic anthropology with a main focus on language “use” in society. Among the main topics to be addressed are the notions of language ideology (how language is conceptualized by its users, e.g., what they think they do with language when they talk and otherwise utilize their language); pragmatics and metapragmatics; socio-cultural semiosis of linguistic practices, incl.
    [Show full text]