2 80 JOIIN ROBINSON “CLEAN, President, JOSEPH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2 80 JOIIN ROBINSON “CLEAN, President, JOSEPH 2 80 March 14, 1865. JOIIN ROBINSON “CLEAN, President, in the Chair. No. 1,125.--“ Onthe Main Drainage of London, andthe Interception of theSewage from theRiver Thames.” By JOSEPH WILLIAMBAZALGETTF,, M. Inst. C.E. Tw majority of the inhabitants of cities and towns are frequently unconscious of the magnitude, intricacy, and extent of the under- ground works, which have been designed and constructed at great cost, and are necessary for the maintenance of their health and comfort. It is, however,impossible for large numbyrs of the human species to congregate and live upon a limited space, without provision being made for the rapid removal of the refuse thereby produced. This rlecessity is erhaps most forcibly illustrated, by thefearful destruction of lib from malaria,produced amongst troops suddenly encamped upon ground not prevlously so prepared for human habitation. The ravages of disease, thus engendered, hccame a subject of serious alarm amongst theallied troops in the Crimea ; andthere are many instances of themortality in armiesarising from this cause, having far exceeded thedeaths from actual warfare. Various methods have been, and still are, adopted in different parts of the globe, for obviating thedangers which thus force themselves upon the attention of mankind. The Jews, it is known, kept a furnace called‘‘ Gehenna,” or “ Hell-fire,” constantly .burning in the Valley of Hinnom, into which the refuse of the city of Jeru- salem was daily cast, as well as the dead bodies of crinlinals; and even the most savage nations are unable entirely to neglect these considerations. The Chinese, sacrificing to a largeextent the delicacy and comfort so highly prized by more civdized nations, but with a sound appreciation of the value of’ town refuse, apply it in the most direct and rude manner to the reproduction of their growing crops. The solid refuse of Parishas aleo, formany years, been separated and removed for agricultural manure ; but the drainage of that city, and of most of the continental towns, has, until of late years, to a large extent flowed over the surface of . ___ 1 The discuesiuu up011 this and the pircccding I’apcr occupiecl portimii; of four evdngir, but an abhxl of the w!de is given consecutively. THE MAIN DRAINAGE OF LONDON. 28 1 the streets. Thedrainage of English towns hasin thisrespect been mostly in advance of those of other countries ; ani: Ilondon, even prior to the introduction of the improved system, was probably the best-drained city of the present age. One important feature, which it is not the object of this communication to dwell upon, has however, up to the present time, been altogether neglected-the Utilisation of Sewage for agricultural purposes. This subject is now occupying much of the consideration of scientific men, and of the public generally, and is deserving of special consideration in a separate Paper. Before proceeding to describe the modernworks for the improved drainage of London, a glance at the early history of its sewerage may not be uninteresting. The Minutes of Proceedings of some of the earlier Commissions of Sewers contain many curious entries, showing that the subject of sewerage received the attention of the Legislature from a very earlydate. Amongstothers, a proposal by Sir Christopher Wren for improved drainage, nearly two hun- dred years ago, is preserved in MS. in the records of the ancient Westminster Commission. '' Saturday, ye 13th April, 1678. '' Proposalls delivered by S? Christopher Wren touching thenew street in St. Margaret's, vi&.- 1 '' It is proposed, 'Chat whereas y new sewer in Westminster, nom pro- posed to be carryed through Gedrge yard to Stories corner, aud thence through Long ditch to Sre Rob Pyes sluice, by an uniforme riseing frome ye Thames to the sayd sluice, so as to receive a flush of water from the Mill ditch, by meanes of the sayd sluice, for the scouring and cleansing of the sayd sewer. Now, if the sayd sewer which is already brought to Stories corner by a riseing levell, should be carried with a fall ye otherway through Long ditch, and so through Deane's yard, and all along by the Mill ditch, and then be vented into ye Thames, neare ye sluice of the Mill. And if a small branch with a sluice should be brought from the King's canall with His Majesty's allowances. It is conceived this way would be far more advantageous to cleane ye sewer, than ye antient ways of receiv- ing a flush from the Mill pools, and may be done at any ebbe, and the charge will be lesse than ye scouring and wharfeingthe Mill poole, because ten times the quantity of water may be afforded from the canall without drawing downe canall above 4 inches, which will be immediately supplyecl again at flood, and ye water taking the sewer in the middle and driveing downe two waies to each end of the sewer will more effectually cleanse it. " That a Draught of a Decree be made according to ye proposalls afore- sayd." " Saturday ye 30th of Nov., 1678. " Upon readeing a paper intituled, An Estimate of y" Charge of several Works to be done in relation to ye Back Waters in St. hlargarett's, \Vest- minster. It is ordered, That tlle worlre thereinmentioned, to bedone in Brasbyes alley in Gardener's lane, be forthwith done and performed. And that the other particulars in the sayd paper mentioned, be referwd to Sir Christopher Wren, who is desired to colluider the same aud make report what is fitt to bc clone therein." 282 THE MAIN DRAlNAGE OF LONDON. Commissioners of Sewers were inthose days persons of con- siderable importance,for on the4th February, 1663, it was ordered ‘‘ that ye kinges Majestie (Charles 11.) beare one halfe of ye charge of ye carrying away of ye rubbish at the sluice by his said Majesties bouling green,”and on the17th April, 1669, “That Francis Crassett, clerk tothis Commission, doo attend his Majesties officers concerning the Kinges arreares which are in arreare upon his said Majestie for casting ye comon sewers synce ye thyme of his Majesties happy restauration,”and again in 1768, His Majesty George 111. was permitted by an order of Court of the West- minster Commissioners of Sewers, at his own cost, to alter the line of the King’s Scholars’ Pond Sewer from under Her Majesty the Queen’s palace in St. James’s Park, and it was- “ Ordered that His Majestymay remove the sewer from under IIer Majesty’s the Queen’s Palace in St. James’s Park, by making a new sewer from the north side of this said Yalace to the road leading from Bucking- ham Gate towards i’imlico, at His Majesty’s expense if His Majesty so plcascs.” Up to about the year 1815, it was penal to discharge sewage, or other offensive matters, into the sewers; cesspoolswere regarded as the proper receptaclesfor house drainage,and sewers as the leghimate channels for carrying off the surface waters only. Afterwards it became permissive, and in the year 1847 the first Act was obtained makingit compulsory, to drain houses into ccwers. The Fleet Sewer, formerly known as the River of Wells, or the Old .Bourne (now calledHolborn), was. fed by several springs, from which originated the names of many of the populous districts of London, such as Sadler’s Well,Bagnigge \Vell, Lamb’s Conduit, Chad’s Well,and Clerk‘s Well or Clerkenwell, which latter derived its name from the parish clerks of the City of London, who used to meet there annually to represent certain parts of Scripture in a theatrical manner, and thither the nobility, tlle lord mayor and citizens repaired to see the performances. In 1218, theFleet supplied the people residing west of Chancery Lane,then called ‘‘ Foreigners,” with water ; and ill 1307, a mill, the property of‘ the Templars, was removed on the Uround that it disturbed tlle water. The Fleet Sewer was at that time9 navigated up to Holborn Bridge, and it was not until 1732 that it was, by Act of Parliament, covered in between Holborn Bridge and Fleet Bridge. The waters from a spring at TyeBourne andfrom the Bayswatcr Brook (now called theRanelagh Sewer) were also conveyed, in &inch leaden pipes, into tllc neighbouring dwellings and, in 1730, Queen Caroline fed the Serpcntn~cin Hyde Park wlth watcr from THE DRAINAGEMAIN OF LONDON. 283 the Ranelagh. Of late years, however, the water so polluted the lake that it hasbeen diverted by a new sewer through the Park. TheRanelagh and the King’s Scholars’ Pond Sewers, the Fleet Ditch, and other main valley lines were at this time, and for many subsequent years, open brooks, ponded up at various points along their route, so as to form ornamental waters in the pleasure-grounds of the gentry, who lived in what still continued to be the suburbs of the metropolis. Plate 15 Fig. 2, represents the condition andappearance of theRanelagh sewer, astaken from actual surveys in 1809. The Commissioners of Sewers of those days were wont to make an annual personal inspection of’ the sewers under their charge, a duty which has of late years been discontinued. As the population of London increased, ’the subsoil became thickly studded with cesspoo1s, improved household appliances were introduced, overflow drains from the cesspools to the sewers were constructed,thus the sewers became polluted, and covered brickchannels were necessarily substituted for existing open streams. Prior to the year 1847, the sewers were under the management of eight distinct Commissions, viz., the City, Westminster, Holborn and Finsbury, Tower Hamlets, Poplar and Blackwall, Surrey and Kent, Greenwich, andSt.
Recommended publications
  • HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource
    HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes
    [Show full text]
  • Never in the Field of Urban Geology Have So Many Granites Been Looked At
    Urban Geology in London No. 22 Never in the field of urban geology have so many granites been looked at by so few! A stroll along the Victoria Embankment from Charing Cross to Westminster & Blackfriars Bridge Ruth Siddall & Di Clements This walk starts outside Charing Cross station and then turns down Villier’s Street to the Thames Embankment. The walker then must take a choice (or retrace their steps). One may either follow the Embankment east along the River Thames to Blackfriars Bridge, taking in Victoria Embankment Gardens and Cleopatra’s Needle on the way. Alternative, one may turn westwards towards Westminster and take in the RAF Memorial and the new Battle of Britain Memorial. A variety of London transport options can be picked up at the mainline and underground stations at either ends of the walk. The inspiration for this walk is a field trip that Di Clements led, on behalf of the Geologists’ Association, for the Department of Energy & Climate Change (DECC) on 18th September 2014 (Clements pers. comm.). Although the main focus of this walk is the embankment, we will also encounter a number of buildings and monument en route. As ever, information on architects and architecture is gleaned from Pevsner (Bradley & Pevsner, 1999; 2003) unless otherwise cited. By far and away, the main rock we will encounter on this walk is granite. Granite comes in many varieties, but always has the same basic composition, being composed of the major rock forming minerals, quartz, orthoclase and plagioclase feldspar and mica, either the variety muscovite or biotite or both.
    [Show full text]
  • MELBOURNE SEWERAGE SYSTEM Nineteenth Century Scheme
    Engineers Australia Engineering Heritage Victoria Nomination for the Engineering Heritage Australia Heritage Recognition Program MELBOURNE SEWERAGE SYSTEM Nineteenth Century Scheme July 2014 Front Cover Photograph Captions Top Left: Lord Hopetoun inspecting Spotswood Pumping Station, 1895. Image: Public Records Office Victoria Top Right: Tunnelling excavation of the North Yarra Main Sewer. Image: Water Services Association of Australia Bottom Left: Main Outfall Sewer. Image: Culture Victoria Bottom Right: Spotswood Pumping Station shortly after it was constructed. Image: Museum Victoria Engineering Heritage nomination - Melbourne Sewerage 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Introduction 5 2 Heritage Nomination Letter 7 3 Heritage Assessment 8 3.1 Basic Data for Melbourne Sewerage System 8 3.1.1 Basic Data – Spotswood Pumping Station 8 3.1.2 Basic Data – Western Treatment Plant 11 3.1.3 Basic Data – Main Outfall Sewer 12 3.1.4 Basic Data – Sewerage Reticulation system 13 3.1.5 Historical Notes 15 3.1.6 Heritage Listings 20 3.2 Assessment of Significance 21 3.2.1 Historical significance 21 3.2.2 Historic Individuals or Association 22 3.2.3 Creative or Technical Achievement 22 3.2.4 Research Potential 23 3.2.5 Social 23 3.2.6 Rarity 23 3.2.7 Representativeness 24 3.2.8 Integrity/Intactness 24 3.2.9 Comparison with other systems 24 4 Statement of Significance 31 4.1 Area of Significance 31 5 Interpretation Plan 32 5.1 Interpretation Strategy 32 5.2 Date for the event 32 5.3 The Interpretation Panels 32 5.4 Design Process for the Panel Content 34 5.5
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Conservation Casework Log Notes March 2018
    CONSERVATION CASEWORK LOG NOTES MARCH 2018 The GT conservation team received 136 new cases in England and TWO cases in Wales during February, in addition to ongoing work on previously logged cases. Written responses were submitted by the GT and/or CGTs for the following cases. In addition to the responses below, 47 ‘No Comment’ responses were lodged by the GT and 5 by CGTs in response to planning applications included in the weekly lists. Site County GT Ref Reg Proposal Written Response Grade ENGLAND Bristol Local Plan Avon E17/1570 n/a LOCAL PLAN Bristol Local Plan CGT WRITTEN RESPONSE 31.03.2018 Review We are grateful for the opportunity to comment on this Local Plan Review. As previously notified to you, The Gardens Trust, which is the statutory consultee on matters concerning registered parks and gardens, is now working closely with County Gardens Trusts, and the responsibility for commenting on Local Plan Reviews in this context has now passed to Avon Gardens Trust. The Trust notes that Policy BCS22 Conservation and the historic environment in the Core Strategy of June 2011, and Policy DM31 of the Site Allocations and Development Management Policies of July 2014 are proposed to be retained. The Local Plan Review consultation document makes a number of strategic proposals, for example to meet housing need, to provide new transport infrastructure, and in respect of employment, land. Such proposals may, depending on location, detailed siting and design, have an impact on registered and unregistered historic parks and gardens. 1 The Trust does not seek to comment on such proposals at the present time, but would expect to be engaged in its role as statutory consultee as and when the details of such proposals are known.
    [Show full text]
  • Lea Valley Walk Section 5 (Three Mills to Limehouse Basin)
    Lea Valley Walk To reach the start from Bromley-by-Bow station (District Line): Turn Section 5 (Three Mills to Limehouse Basin) left out of the station and at once go under the underpass and come up to pavement level on the far side of the main road. Go right to walk north, then Version 3 : July 2011 turn right down Three Mill Lane. Directions: Having come up the towpath ramp onto Three Mill Lane, turn left to cross the canal, and then turn right down another towpath ramp. There was a mill here in Saxon times, in fact at one stage four mills were Start: Three Mills (TQ382828) here, driven by sea and river water which came up the Lea at high tide. The clock tower dates from about 1750. The mills produced flour until the mid Station: Bromley-by-Bow 1700’s, after which the owners became involved in the manufacture of gin, Finish: Limehouse Basin (TQ362807) calling themselves “millers and malt distillers”. The House Mill is open to visitors on Sunday afternoons in summer (admission fee). The former Station: Limehouse DLR Station Victorian bottling plant (at the far end of the cobbled street) is now a film studio, the first “Big Brother” set was alongside to the east. Distance: 2 miles (3.2 km) Join the towpath again, this time on the other side of the canal. Water is on both sides of the towpath. Go under the London-Southend railway bridge Introduction: Three Mills to Limehouse Basin became Section 5 of the Lea and pass the closed footbridge which crosses over the tidal River Lea to the Valley Walk in July 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Maech 22, 1901
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, MAECH 22, 1901. 2041 Purchase, acquisition, laying out, planting and (e) Removal of certain gates, bars, or other improvement of parks, gardens, and open spaces. obstructions in streets. Fencing, drainage, buildings, entrance gates, (f) Expenditure in connection with historical bandstands, shelters, gymnasiums, boats, appli- buildings. ances, and conveniences of various kinds in Purchases of property, compensation, and parks and open spaces, formation and improve- works, rehousing of persons displaced, and other ment of lakes and ponds, and providing accommo- incidental expenditure under the London County dation for bathing, river-walls and embankments Council (Improvements) Act, 18P9. viz.:— and water supply. (a) Holborn to Strand, new street. Contributions towards purchase, acquisition, (b) Southampton-row widening. laying out and improvement of opeu spaces, (c) Wandsworth-road, Lambeth, widening. gardens and recreation grounds. (d) High-street, Kensington, widening. Purchase of propertj-, compensation, and (e) Cat and Mutton Bridge, Shoreditch, works in connection with the tunnel authorised reconstruction. by the Thames Tunnel (Blackwall) Acts, 1887 (f) OH Gravel-lane Bridge, St. George's-in- and 1888, including formation of approaches the-East, j econstruction. and provisions for rehousing persons displaced. Construction of railway sidings at Hortou Purchase of property, compensation, and con- including the exchange and purchase of lands, struction of subways, authorized by the Thames plant, and stock. Tunnel (Greenwich to Millwall) Act, 1897, and Purchase of land (the " Brickfield"), Lime- the Thames Tunnel (Rotherhithe and Ratcliff) house, for open space. Act, 1900. Purchases of property, compensation, and Schemes and contributions to schemes, acquisi- works, and other incidental expenditure under tion of lands, erection of dwellings, and other the London County Council (Improvements) Act, expenditure under the Housing of the Working 1900, viz.
    [Show full text]
  • All London Green Grid River Cray and Southern Marshes Area Framework
    All River Cray and Southern Marshes London Area Framework Green Grid 5 Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 8 Area Description 9 Strategic Context 10 Vision 12 Objectives 14 Opportunities 16 Project Identification 18 Project Update 20 Clusters 22 Projects Map 24 Rolling Projects List 28 Phase Two Early Delivery 30 Project Details 48 Forward Strategy 50 Gap Analysis 51 Recommendations 53 Appendices 54 Baseline Description 56 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA05 Links 58 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA05 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg .
    [Show full text]
  • London National Park City Week 2018
    London National Park City Week 2018 Saturday 21 July – Sunday 29 July www.london.gov.uk/national-park-city-week Share your experiences using #NationalParkCity SATURDAY JULY 21 All day events InspiralLondon DayNight Trail Relay, 12 am – 12am Theme: Arts in Parks Meet at Kings Cross Square - Spindle Sculpture by Henry Moore - Start of InspiralLondon Metropolitan Trail, N1C 4DE (at midnight or join us along the route) Come and experience London as a National Park City day and night at this relay walk of InspiralLondon Metropolitan Trail. Join a team of artists and inspirallers as they walk non-stop for 48 hours to cover the first six parts of this 36- section walk. There are designated points where you can pick up the trail, with walks from one mile to eight miles plus. Visit InspiralLondon to find out more. The Crofton Park Railway Garden Sensory-Learning Themed Garden, 10am- 5:30pm Theme: Look & learn Crofton Park Railway Garden, Marnock Road, SE4 1AZ The railway garden opens its doors to showcase its plans for creating a 'sensory-learning' themed garden. Drop in at any time on the day to explore the garden, the landscaping plans, the various stalls or join one of the workshops. Free event, just turn up. Find out more on Crofton Park Railway Garden Brockley Tree Peaks Trail, 10am - 5:30pm Theme: Day walk & talk Crofton Park Railway Garden, Marnock Road, London, SE4 1AZ Collect your map and discount voucher before heading off to explore the wider Brockley area along a five-mile circular walk. The route will take you through the valley of the River Ravensbourne at Ladywell Fields and to the peaks of Blythe Hill Fields, Hilly Fields, One Tree Hill for the best views across London! You’ll find loads of great places to enjoy food and drink along the way and independent shops to explore (with some offering ten per cent for visitors on the day with your voucher).
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, November 26, 1872
    5702 THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBER 26, 1872, In Parliament.—Session 1873- ' 8. To amend and enlarge some of the powers Charing-cross and Victoria Embankment and provisions of (among other Acts) ".The Approach. Metropolis Management Act, 1855," " The (Power to Metropolitan Board of Works to Metropolis Management Amendment Act, 1856," Construct Street from Charing-cross to Vic- " The Metropolis Management Amendment Act, toria Embankment j Extension of Coal and 1862," "The Thames Embankment and Metro- Wine Duties; Borrowing of Money, and other polls Improvement (Loans) Act, 1864," "The Powers; Amendment of Acts.) Thames Embankment and Metropolis Improve- OTICE is hereby given that the Metro- ment (Loans) Act, 1868," "The Metropolitan N politan Board of Works (who are in this Board of Works (Loans) Acts, 1869 to 1871," nqtice referred to as "the Board") intend to and of the several London Coal and Wine Duties apply to Parliament in the ensuing Session for Continuance Acts. leave to bring in a Bill to confer upon them the 9. To incorporate with the Bill the necessary following or some of the following among other provisions of " The Lands Clauses Consolidation powers (that is to say) :— Acts, 1845, 1860, and 1869," to vary and extin- 1. To make wholly in the parish of St. guish all rights and privileges which would inter- Martin-in-the-Fields, in the county of Middlesex, fere with the objects of the Bill, and to confer a new street to commence at Charing-cross at or upon the Board all such other rights, powers, and near Northumberland House, passing through privileges as may be necessary or expedient in that house and the premises connected therewith, carrying out the objects of the Bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Hackney Archives - History Articles in Hackney Today by Subject
    Hackney Archives - History Articles in Hackney Today by Subject These articles are published every fortnight in Hackney Today newspaper. They are usually on p.25. They can be downloaded from the Hackney Council website at http://www.hackney.gov.uk/w-hackneytoday.htm. Articles prior to no.158 are not available online. Issue Publication Subject Topic no. date 207 11.05.09 125-130 Shoreditch High Street Architecture: Business 303 25.03.13 4% Industrial Dwellings Company Social Care: Jewish Housing 357 22.06.15 50 years of Hackney Archives Research 183 12.05.08 85 Broadway in Postcards Research Methods 146 06.11.06 Abney Park Cemetery Open Spaces 312 12.08.13 Abney Park Cemetery Registers Local History: Records 236 19.07.10 Abney Park chapel Architecture: Ecclesiastical 349 23.02.15 Activating the Archive Local Activism: Publications 212 20.07.09 Air Flight in Hackney Leisure: Air 158 07.05.07 Alfred Braddock, Photographer Business: Photography 347 26.01.15 Allen's Estate, Bethune Road Architecture: Domestic 288 13.08.12 Amateur sport in Hackney Leisure: Sport 227 08.03.10 Anna Letitia Barbauld, 1743-1825 Literature: Poet 216 21.09.09 Anna Sewell, 1820-1878 Literature: Novelist 294 05.11.12 Anti-Racism March Anti-Racism 366 02.11.15 Anti-University of East London Radicalism: 1960s 265 03.10.11 Asylum for Deaf and Dumb Females, 1851 Social Care 252 21.03.11 Ayah's Home: 1857-1940s Social Care: Immigrants 208 25.05.09 Barber's Barn 1: John Okey, 1650s Commonwealth and Restoration 209 08.06.09 Barber's Barn 2: 16th to early 19th Century Architecture:
    [Show full text]
  • How Do You Lose a River?
    Number 1,1, SpringSummer 2016 2015 Waypoints 1 How do you lose a river? In this paper I explore the concept of the lost river and the implications this Jonathan Gardner term has for our understanding of the history of changing urban environ- jonathan.gardner@ucl. ments. ac.uk In taking a voyage down one of the London 2012 Olympic Park’s now-filled waterways, the Pudding Mill River, charting it and the surrounding area’s diverse history, I explore how rivers end up becoming losable. Drawing on diverse methodologies from archaeology and geography and with a particular emphasis on mapping, I argue that a literal and metaphorical exploration of such a rapidly changing environment reveals a multitude of buried narratives and fluid histories. This research suggests that the labeling of a river as lost is not a politically neutral act and that, with its romantic connotations, the term may actually serve to legitimise insensitive and contentious changes to our environment. Much has been written about London’s numerous lost watercourses over the years, most notably Nicho- las Barton’s seminal volume The Lost Rivers of London [1] and more, recently Paul Talling’s London’s Lost Riv- ers [2] and Tom Bolton’s London’s Lost Rivers: A Walker’s Guide [3]. In addition to these works a large range of blogs and websites devoted to the lost rivers are continually created and updated, for example, Diamond Geezer 2015 [4]. The subject is one that seems to inspire intense interest amongst a wide range of people and would suggest that city-dwellers are curiously attracted to such forgotten or lost spaces, and in particular, the unusual juxtaposition of the natural and the urban these watercourses seem to present.
    [Show full text]
  • The New River Improvement Project 7Th September 2017 Claudia Innes
    The New River Improvement Project 7th September 2017 Claudia Innes Community Projects Executive Corporate Responsibility Team ∗ Team of 18 - Education, community investment, volunteering and nature reserves ∗ Manage a £6.5 million community investment fund between 2014 and 2019 ∗ Aim to engage customers and communities through: ∗ environmental enhancement ∗ improving access and recreation ∗ educational outreach Governance • All funding applicants apply by form. • All spend is approved in advance by our Charities Committee • A Memorandum Of Understanding is generated to release the funds to the partner. 3 The New River – a brief history ∗ Aqueduct completed in 1613 by Goldsmith and Adventurer Hugh Myddelton and Mathematician Edward Wright. ∗ King James I agreed to provide half the costs on condition he received half of the profits ∗ Total cost of construction was £18,500. ∗ Essential part of London’s water supply. 48 million gallons a day are carried for treatment. The New River – a brief history ∗ Originally fed only by sources at Chadwell and Amwell Springs. ∗ The course of the New River now ends at Stoke Newington East Reservoir (Woodberry Wetlands). ∗ Water levels are regulated by sluices. Path development ∗ The New River Path was developed over 12 years at a cost of over £2 million ∗ 28 miles from Hertfordshire to North London. ∗ We have worked in partnership with, and with the support of, many organisations; including Groundwork, the New River Action Group, Friends of New River Walk, schools and communities, and all the local authorities
    [Show full text]