<<

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect

Interoception relates to sleep and sleep disorders

1 1,2,3

Yishul Wei and Eus JW Van Someren

The and responds to afferent confined to visceral sensations but has expanded to

signals arising from the body. These interoceptive afferents are encompass other sensory modalities that inform the

essential to physiological homeostatic control and are known CNS about the physiological states across the body, most



to influence an individual’s momentary affect, , notably and [1 ,2]. Intero-

, and conscious experiences. Both sleep and ceptive information arising from body tissues is conveyed

interoception are tightly connected to physical and mental well- to the CNS via neural and humoral pathways as well as

being. This review outlines the current knowledge about the through indirect signaling involving immune cells and

interactions between interoception and sleep. It is neurovascular coupling [4,5]. Ascending neural pathways

demonstrated that there are complex, dynamic relations interface with the central autonomic network at multiple

between sleep and sensory processes within each modality of spinal and subcortical levels and ultimately deliver inter-

interoception, including thermoception, nociception, visceral oceptive information to the ‘neuromatrix’ within the

sensations, and subjective about these sensations. A cerebral cortex [5,6]. Neuronal signaling along the path-

better understanding and appreciation of the intricate ways is subject to descending facilitation and inhibition

interrelations may facilitate management of functional somatic from the brain and modulated by assorted hormonal and

symptoms, chronic , insomnia, and other sleep and mental inflammatory factors [7]. Interoceptive sensitivity is thus

disorders. determined by not only the neuro-endocrino-immuno-

logical condition but also the affective, cognitive, moti-

Addresses vational, and arousal state of the individual.

1

Department of Sleep and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for

Neuroscience (NIN), an Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of

The aim of this review is to provide a synopsis of the

Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2

Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics current knowledge about the interactions between

and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU sleep—which has prominent bidirectional relationship

University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

with all of the mentioned factors [8,9]—and the intero-

3

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Psychiatry, Amsterdam

ceptive systems. Both sleep and interoception are multi-

Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

dimensional constructs. For instance, subjective sleep

4

Corresponding author: Van Someren, Eus JW ([email protected]) quality and interoceptive feelings are often uncorrelated

with objective measures of sleep and interoception. Thus

far the relationship between each dimension of sleep and

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2019, 33:1–7

each dimension of interoception has not been equally

This review comes from a themed issue on Cognition and

investigated. The present review discusses the most

- *sleep and cognition*

representative themes in the current literature, including:

Edited by Michael Chee and Philippe Peigneux

impacts of interoception on sleep initiation, the roles of

interoception during sleep, impacts of sleep deprivation

on interoception, associations between interoception and

habitual sleep, and altered interoception in sleep disor-

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.11.008

ders (notably insomnia disorder).

2352-1546/ã 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an

open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative-

commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Interoception affects sleep initiation

Noxious or stressful stimuli naturally increase arousal and

hinder sleep. In contrast, certain types of interoceptive

Introduction stimuli appear somnogenic. For example, gastrointestinal

Central nervous system (CNS) processing of bodily sig- stimulation has been shown to reduce sleep onset latency,

nals, broadly known as interoception, has become an mirroring the familiar phenomenon of postprandial sleep-

integral topic in the current discourse of affective, cogni-

 iness [2,10]. It has also been observed in both animals and

tive, behavioral, social, and clinical neurosciences [1 anesthetized humans that carotid sinus stimulation

,2,3]. The notion of interoception was traditionally

4

Following the nomenclature recently proposed by the Human Affectome Project, we use the term interoceptive feelings to refer to subjective

experiences regarding body parts (or the body as a whole) that may derive from interoceptive afferents but may also integrate other sensory (e.g. tactile



[69]) information and may even originate within the CNS itself [1 ]. Interoceptive feelings can manifest as symptoms or complaints in clinical

settings.

www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2020, 33:1–7

2 Cognition and perception - *sleep and cognition*

triggers EEG activity resembling slow waves that are sleep. However, it has been demonstrated that subtle skin

characteristic of sleep [2,11]. warming during sleep can promote SWS without chang-

ing core body temperature [17], thus supporting direct

The link between thermoception and the sleep–wake impacts of skin temperature on SWS expression.

behavior has attracted particularly widespread attention



[12,13 ,14]. Mild skin warming within the thermoneutral Studies on the nociceptive laser-evoked potential (LEP)

zone during wakefulness reduces vigilance and promotes and the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) during sleep



sleep onset [13 ], although the effect appears compro- have shown that cortical processing of interoceptive

mised in the elderly, likely due to the age-related decline information is present but attenuated as compared to

in thermosensitivity [15]. More intense heat as well as wakefulness [18,19]. Interestingly, the presence of a late

cold exposure at bedtime impedes sleep. However, body positive component of the LEP predicts a subsequent

heating a few hours before bedtime reduces sleep onset arousal, indicating that nociceptive input can elicit higher

latency and increases slow-wave sleep (SWS), colloquially order cognitive evaluation even during sleep [18].

known as the ‘warm bath effect’ and likely to involve a

cascade of thermoregulatory processes [14]. This shows The roles of interoception in dreams and rapid eye

that sleep propensity depends on both magnitudes and movement (REM) sleep are particularly elusive. Intero-



timing of the thermal stimuli. ceptive feelings in dreams are rare [1 ,18]. REM sleep is

characterized by apparently CNS-initiated autonomic

Based on these findings, an extension of the traditional swings with minimal interoceptive feedback control, giv-

two-process model of sleep has been proposed [14]. In the ing rise to erratic heart rate, blood pressure, and breathing

extended model, sleep propensity is not only determined patterns [8,11,12,16]. The HEP however indicates

by homeostatic sleep pressure and the circadian phase but increased cortical processing of cardiovascular input dur-

also dependent on sensory gating signals. An interesting ing REM sleep relative to non-REM sleep [19]. This

hypothesis is that sleep may itself involve processing during REM sleep has been found to be

interoceptive mechanisms. For instance, sleep depriva- elevated in people with nightmare disorder—regardless

tion is known to elevate blood pressure and distal skin of whether a nightmare during the assessment night



temperature [11,13 ]. These changes could in turn be actually occurred [20]. Interoception, interoceptive feel-

picked up by carotid baroreceptors and skin thermore- ings, and autonomic output thus seem dissociated during

ceptors, generating feedback input that promotes sleepi- dreams and REM sleep.

ness. Likewise, the circadian component may itself also

involve interoceptive mechanisms, for example, through Sleep deprivation



the thermoregulatory effects of melatonin [13 ]. Acute or chronic sleep deprivation results in alterations in

interoceptive feelings. This is most clearly demonstrated

Interoception during sleep in the pain literature, where various sleep deprivation

Stable sleep is marked by profound suppression of various paradigms (e.g. total sleep deprivation, sleep restriction,

behavioral defense responses (e.g. hypoxic/hypercapnic SWS disruption, and sleep fragmentation) have been

ventilatory responses, coughing, swallowing, shivering, shown to increase sensitivity to painful stimuli as well

and withdrawal reflexes) against adverse conditions or as spontaneous pain [21]. An increase in somatic com-

stimuli, and occurrences of such responses typically plaints besides pain following sleep deprivation has also

involve arousals or awakenings [8,10,12,16]. In addition been reported [22]. More generally, the ‘ of sleep

to sleep-induced muscle hypotonia, changes associated deprivation’ that many readers are familiar with can be

with sleep within the sensory systems are believed to characterized by fatigue, negative mood, and an overall

contribute to suppression of these responses [8,12,16]. perception of unwellness [23], resembling in several



The changes in interoceptive sensitivity prevent arousals respects the feeling state of sickness [1 ,4,9]. Interest-

and protect sleep. Unfortunately, such mechanisms nec- ingly, a sleep-deprived person is indeed likely to be

essarily render body tissues vulnerable to adverse physi- judged as being sick by others [24].

ological conditions or events (e.g. gastroesophageal reflux

[10]), which could lead to severe clinical complications A recent study evaluated the effects of chronic sleep

should those events become frequent during sleep. restriction with intermittent weekend recovery sleep

for up to three weeks. Multiple measures tapping differ-

It has been shown that manipulation of ambient temper- ent pain-related processes were assessed. It was found

ature during sleep is able to alter the core body tempera- that the heat pain threshold is lowered by sleep restriction

ture rhythm as well as sleep architecture. As a result of the during the first week but normalizes afterwards. In con-

use of insulating clothing and bedding, sleep is more trast, increased CNS cold pain facilitation and reduced

easily disturbed by heat than by cold exposure [12]. At cold pain habituation could only be observed in the later



present it is unclear whether alterations in skin tempera- weeks of sleep restriction [25 ]. The study highlights that

ture or in core body temperature exert more influences on the observed effects of acute sleep deprivation may not

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2020, 33:1–7 www.sciencedirect.com

Sleep and interoception Wei and Van Someren 3

generalize to chronic sleep deprivation, as each type of medial orbitofrontal cortex being the common neural

sleep deprivation may differentially affect the multiple substrate.

processes involved in pain perception.

Investigating the intra-individual relationship between

Sleep deprivation may induce hyperalgesia through sev- fluctuations in sleep and somatic complaints could pro-

eral neurochemical pathways including the opioid, mono- vide more mechanistic insights into their interactions.

amine, orexin, and endocannabinoid systems as well as Several studies in the pain literature, mostly carried out in



endocrine and immune mechanisms [26 ]. Neuroimag- patients with assorted somatic pain conditions, have

ing studies probing the brain substrates of sleep depriva- consistently pointed to sleep (assessed with daily self-

tion-induced changes in pain processing have just begun reports and sometimes with actigraphy) as a more reliable

to emerge. One recent study found amplified reactivity of predictor of subsequent pain than vice versa [39]. The

the primary somatosensory cortex and blunted reactivity same ‘microlongitudinal’ paradigm has also been applied

of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), , and insula in to the study of irritable bowel syndrome, a functional

response to heat pain stimulation following a night of total gastrointestinal disorder characterized by hypersensitivity

sleep deprivation. Moreover, the sleep deprivation- [7]. It was found that poor self-reported sleep quality is

induced changes in reactivity of the primary somatosen- associated with next-day abdominal pain but not with

sory cortex and thalamus predict corresponding lowering non-pain gastrointestinal symptoms [40]. Therefore,

of the heat pain threshold [27]. Another study reported across heterogeneous conditions, it seems that the asso-

that a night of fragmented sleep attenuates and delays ciation between poor self-reported sleep and next-day

NAcc responses to heat pain stimulation [28]. Involve- pain is especially robust.

ment of the NAcc as implicated by both studies suggests

that processes related to affective valuation and cognitive A recent community-based study assessed how people

control are likely to be engaged in the relationship themselves perceive daytime pain to associate with sub-

between sleep and pain. sequent sleep and vice versa. Interestingly, the perceived

sleep–pain associations are asymmetric: Sleep worsens

more after a day with more-than-usual pain than it

Interoception covaries with habitual sleep improves after a day with less-than-usual pain. Also, pain

It is not uncommon to find sleep disturbances to accom- worsens more after a night of worse-than-usual sleep than

pany somatic complaints. The experimental evidence it improves after a night of better-than-usual sleep. This

summarized above would imply bidirectional relations asymmetry becomes stronger in people with more severe



between somatic discomfort and poor sleep. Longitudinal habitual insomnia (Figure 1) or pain [35 ]. The study

studies have repeatedly shown that self-reported sleep highlights the possibility that the effects of better and

disturbances predict new-onset pain conditions and vice worse nights of sleep on pain are not of equal magnitudes,

versa [29]. Conversely, good sleep quality has been shown which could potentially explain why treatments targeting

to predict (partial) resolution of pain [30]. Pain however insomnia only marginally alleviate pain in patients with

does not seem to predict persistence versus remission of comorbid insomnia and chronic pain [41].

insomnia [31]. Longitudinal data for the bidirectional

relationship between poor sleep and somatic complaints Studies have also linked habitual sleep to laboratory test

besides pain are lacking, but cross-sectional data have results on interoceptive feelings. One seminal popula-

demonstrated robust associations between them across tion-based study found reduced cold pain tolerance in



different populations [32–34,35 ]. people reporting longer sleep onset latency, lower sleep

efficiency, and more severe and frequent insomnia [42].

A recent population-based study conducted in Japan In another study, healthy volunteers reporting more sleep

indicated that pain symptoms are more reliably associated difficulties were shown to perform worse on the intero-

with self-reported sleep insufficiency than with self- ceptive cardiac discrimination task. Surprisingly, the asso-

reported sleep duration per se [36]. This result is interest- ciation is reversed in people with affective disorders [43].

ing in light of a recent interventional study showing that

sleep extension benefits (cold) pain tolerance, more so in Sleep disorders

people who report to habitually sleep less than needed Diagnosed sleep disorders are common among patients

[37]. In a neuroimaging study, reporting to habitually with chronic pain. The most prevalent comorbid sleep

sleep more than needed (termed ‘sleep credit’) was found disorder is insomnia disorder (ID). A recent meta-analysis

to be associated with increased gray matter volume in part estimated that the prevalence of comorbid ID among

of the medial orbitofrontal cortex, which is in turn patients with chronic pain is 72%, much higher than the

associated with less somatic complaints, , prevalence of comorbid restless legs syndrome (RLS,



and paranoia [38]. These converging findings suggest 32%) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA, 32%) [44 ]. Nota-

that subjective sleep insufficiency is an especially impor- bly, laboratory quantitative sensory testing has confirmed

tant factor involved in somatic complaints, with the increased pain sensitivity and implicated altered CNS

www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2020, 33:1–7

4 Cognition and perception - *sleep and cognition*

Figure 1

Sleep Pain Pain Sleep More Pain 1 Better Sleep 1 After Worse Sleep After More Pain After Better Sleep After Less Pain

0.5 0.5

Pain Sleep 0 0 As Usual As Usual

–0.5 –0.5

Less Pain –1 Worse Sleep –1

0–7 8–14 15–21 22–28 0–7 8–14 15–21 22–28 Insomnia Severity Index Insomnia Severity Index

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Average perceived pain after a better night and worse night of sleep than usual (left), and average perceived sleep quality after a day with more

pain and less pain than usual (right), within subgroups of individuals defined by clinical cutoffs of the Insomnia Severity Index. Error bars indicate



95% confidence intervals. Reprinted from Ref. [35 ].

pain facilitation and/or inhibition in ID, RLS, and OSA Resting-State Questionnaire (ARSQ) [52] including

[29]. Chronic pain is also highly prevalent among patients reduced comfort, heightened health concern, height-

with narcolepsy [45]. ented subjective sleepiness, and heightened somatic

awareness as compared to healthy controls [53]. Reduced

Etiological theories of ID hypothesize that attention to comfort in people with ID is further corroborated by their

selective interoceptive or exteroceptive stimuli together deficient ‘liking’ feelings throughout the day [54]. A

with other cognitive activities could lead to a hyperarousal detailed analysis of many dimensions of subjective ther-

state at bedtime that interferes with sleep initiation or moception also revealed a very different profile between

maintenance [46,47]. Somatic discomfort around bedtime people with probable ID and people without sleep com-

can be assessed with the Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale— plaints [55].

Somatic subscale [48], which has indeed been found to

distinguish between people with ID, subclinical poor Strong differences between people with ID and people

sleepers, and normal sleepers and to independently con- without sleep complaints are also reflected in an objective

tribute to self-reported nocturnal wake time and poor measure of interoception. The later part of the frontal

sleep quality [49]. Some studies, however, suggested that HEP is enhanced in people with ID during wakeful rest

insomnia symptoms are more closely related to pre-sleep in the evening, suggesting increased processing of cardiac

cognitive activities than to pre-sleep somatic discomfort signals [56] (Figure 2a). In a follow-up study, it was found

[48,50]. It has been proposed instead that perhaps arousal- that mean EEG microstate duration specifically for micro-

promoting interoceptive input at bedtime is not maxi- state class C is shortened in people with ID [57]

mally consciously recognized by people with ID [51]. (Figure 2b). As duration of class C microstates has been

shown to negatively correlate with the somatic awareness

Altered interoceptive feelings in ID beyond the pre-sleep dimension of the ARSQ [52], this microstate alteration

period have also been demonstrated. During wakeful rest, could be a marker of heightened somatic awareness in ID.

people with ID report aberrant spontaneous mental con-

tent along several dimensions assessed by the Amsterdam

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2020, 33:1–7 www.sciencedirect.com

Sleep and interoception Wei and Van Someren 5

Figure 2 (a) (b) 120 ID ID CTRL CTRL 0.3

100 0.2

0.1

V) 80 µ

0

HEP Amplitude HEP ( 60 -0.1 Mean Microstate Duration (ms)

-0.2 40

-0.3

20

-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 A B C D E Time (ms) Microstate Class

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

(a) Frontal heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) waveforms in 32 people with insomnia disorder (ID) and 32 healthy controls (CTRL) during wakeful

rest in the evening with eyes closed. The average time courses over the frontal and prefrontal electrodes (large black dots) time-locked to the R-

wave peak (0 ms) are depicted. Shaded areas indicate one standard error of the mean (SEM). Adapted from Ref. [56]. (b) Boxplots of mean EEG

microstate duration for each microstate class in the same groups of people with ID and CTRL during wakeful rest in the evening with eyes closed.

Data are obtained from Ref. [57]. Asterisks indicate significant group differences ( p < 0.05).

In sum, it is important to note an unfortunate disbalance. perception specifically of large fiber-mediated afferents at

While people with ID show increased interoceptive the soft palate [66]. In comparison, others applying the

awareness across modalities, they are actually less likely same method to the toes showed reduced current per-

to either comfort or to label experiences as com- ception thresholds in people with RLS for both large

fortable or pleasant [51,53–55]. Neuroimaging studies fiber-mediated and small fiber-mediated afferents during

have commenced to find neural correlates of this disba- the symptomatic period [67]. Because participants with

lance and suggested that increased reactivity may relate abnormal test results indicative of peripheral neuropathy

to hyperconnectivity of the angular gyrus while deficient were excluded, the authors concluded that CNS mecha-

comfort sensing likely involves suboptimal orbitofrontal nisms are likely to underlie hyperesthesia in RLS, a

processing [58,59]. The disbalance toward negative conclusion also corroborated by earlier studies using other

experiences may have long-standing consequences, as methodologies [68].

recent studies have found that the affective signatures

of negative emotional experiences could persist through Conclusion

extinction , across the night, and over the long To our knowledge, this is the first review that attempts to

term in people with ID [60–63]. synthesize the vast literature on the links between sleep

and across a wide range of interocep-

With respect to sleep disorders other than ID, accumu- tive modalities. The state of science has really only

lating evidence suggests that OSA is associated with scratched the surface of their complex, dynamic interac-

impaired mechano- and thermosensitivity of the upper tions. We hope that our synopsis has presented a coherent

airway resulting from local neuropathy [64,65]. A recent account of their intricate relationship and will inspire

study systematically examined the functional integrity of innovative future research on this important topic.

afferent neural pathways from the palate by means of

electrical stimulation with alternating currents at differ- Conflict of interest statement

ent frequencies and found in patients with OSA impaired Nothing declared.

www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2020, 33:1–7

6 Cognition and perception - *sleep and cognition*

Acknowledgements 20. Perogamvros L, Park H-D, Bayer L, Perrault AA, Blanke O,

Schwartz S: Increased heartbeat-evoked potential during REM

This work is supported by the European Research Council Advanced Grant sleep in nightmare disorder. NeuroImage Clin 2019, 22:101701.

671084 INSOMNIA and the Bial Foundation grant 190/16.

21. Schrimpf M, Liegl G, Boeckle M, Leitner A, Geisler P, Pieh C: The

effect of sleep deprivation on pain perception in healthy

subjects: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med 2015, 16:1313-1320.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, 22. Ablin JN, Clauw DJ, Lyden AK, Ambrose K, Williams DA,

have been highlighted as: Gracely RH et al.: Effects of sleep restriction and exercise

deprivation on somatic symptoms and mood in healthy adults.



of special interest Clin Exp Rheumatol 2013, 31:53-59.

 of outstanding interest

23. Haack M, Mullington JM: Sustained sleep restriction reduces

emotional and physical well-being. Pain 2005, 119:56-64.

1. Pace-Schott EF, Amole MC, Aue T, Balconi M, Bylsma LM,

 Critchley H et al.: Physiological feelings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev

24. Axelsson J, Sundelin T, Ingre M, Van Someren EJW, Olsson A,

2019, 103:267-304.

Lekander M: Beauty sleep: experimental study on the

An extensive review of the construct of interoception and in particular its

perceived health and attractiveness of sleep deprived people.

relationship with .

BMJ 2010, 341:c6614.

2. Azzalini D, Rebollo I, Tallon-Baudry C: Visceral signals shape

25. Simpson NS, Scott-Sutherland J, Gautam S, Sethna N, Haack M:

brain dynamics and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2019,

 Chronic exposure to insufficient sleep alters processes of pain

23:488-509.

habituation and sensitization. Pain 2018, 159:33-40.

An elaborate experimental study of the effects of acute and chronic sleep

3. Khalsa SS, Adolphs R, Cameron OG, Critchley HD, Davenport PW,

deprivation on different pain-related CNS processes.

Feinstein JS et al.: Interoception and mental health: a roadmap.

Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 2018, 3:501-513.

26. Haack M, Simpson N, Sethna N, Kaur S, Mullington J: Sleep



4. Critchley HD, Harrison NA: Visceral influences on brain and deficiency and chronic pain: potential underlying mechanisms

behavior. Neuron 2013, 77:624-638. and clinical implications. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020,

45:205-216.

5. Mayer EA: Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut–brain A detailed review of the neurochemical, endocrine, and immune mechan-

communication. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011, 12:453-466. isms which may contribute to sleep deprivation-induced hyperalgesia.

6. Garcia-Larrea L, Peyron R: Pain matrices and neuropathic pain 27. Krause AJ, Prather AA, Wager TD, Lindquist MA, Walker MP: The

matrices: a review. Pain 2013, 154:S29-43. pain of sleep loss: a brain characterization in humans. J Neurosci

2019, 39:2291-2300.

7. Anand P, Aziz Q, Willert R, Van Oudenhove L: Peripheral and

central mechanisms of visceral sensitization in man.

28. Seminowicz DA, Remeniuk B, Krimmel SR, Smith MT, Barrett FS,

Neurogastroenterol Motil 2007, 19(Suppl. 1):29-46.

Wulff AB et al.: Pain-related nucleus accumbens function:

modulation by reward and sleep disruption. Pain 2019,

8. Physiological changes of sleep. Sleep Disorders Medicine:

160:1196-1207.

Basic Science, Technical Considerations and Clinical Aspects, edn

4. Edited by Chokroverty S. New York: Springer; 2017:153-194.

29. Doufas AG: Pain and sleep. In Principles and Practice of Sleep

Medicine, edn 6. Edited by Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC.

9. Besedovsky L, Lange T, Haack M: The sleep–immune crosstalk

Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017:1313-1322.

in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2019, 99:1325-1380.

30. Aili K, Nyman T, Svartengren M, Hillert L: Sleep as a predictive

10. Orr WC, Chen CL: Sleep and the . Neurol

factor for the onset and resolution of multi-site pain: a 5-year

Clin 2005, 23:1007-1024.

prospective study. Eur J Pain 2015, 19:341-349.

11. Silvani A, Calandra-Buonaura G, Benarroch EE, Dampney RAL,

Cortelli P: Bidirectional interactions between the baroreceptor 31. Johansson M, Jansson-Fro¨ jmark M, Norell-Clarke A, Linton SJ:

reflex and arousal: an update. Sleep Med 2015, 16:210-216. The role of psychiatric and somatic conditions in incidence

and persistence of insomnia: a longitudinal, community study.

12. Okamoto-Mizuno K, Mizuno K: Effects of thermal environment Sleep Heal 2016, 2:229-238.

on sleep and circadian rhythm. J Physiol Anthropol 2012, 31:14.

32. Asai T, Kaneita Y, Uchiyama M, Takemura S, Asai S, Yokoyama E

13. te Lindert BHW, Van Someren EJW: Skin temperature, sleep,

et al.: Epidemiological study of the relationship between sleep

 and vigilance. Handb Clin Neurol 2018, 156:353-365.

disturbances and somatic and psychological complaints

An up-to-date review of experimental and observational evidence sup-

among the Japanese general population. Sleep Biol Rhythms

porting the connection between skin temperature and sleep.

2006, 4:55-62.

14. Harding EC, Franks NP, Wisden W: The temperature

33. Hartz A, Ross JJ, Noyes R, Williams P: Somatic symptoms and

dependence of sleep. Front Neurosci 2019, 13:336.

psychological characteristics associated with insomnia in

postmenopausal women. Sleep Med 2013, 14:71-78.

15. Raymann RJEM, Swaab DF, Van Someren EJW: Skin

temperature and sleep-onset latency: changes with age and

34. Schlarb AA, Claßen M, Hellmann SM, Vo¨ gele C, Gulewitsch MD:

insomnia. Physiol Behav 2007, 90:257-266.

Sleep and somatic complaints in university students. J Pain

Res 2017, 10:1189-1199.

16. Peever JH, Sessle BJ: Sensory and motor processing during

sleep and wakefulness. In Principles and Practice of Sleep

35. Wei Y, Blanken TF, Van Someren EJW: Insomnia really hurts:

Medicine, edn 6. Edited by Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC.

 effect of a bad night’s sleep on pain increases with insomnia

Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017:239-249.

severity. Front Psychiatry 2018, 9:377.

A community-based observational study showing that the acute within-

17. Raymann RJEM, Swaab DF, Van Someren EJW: Skin deep:

day mutual reactivity of pain and sleep is modulated by habitual insomnia

enhanced sleep depth by cutaneous temperature

severity and habitual pain intensity.

manipulation. Brain 2008, 131:500-513.

18. Mazza S, Magnin M, Bastuji H: Pain and sleep: from reaction to 36. Yamada K, Kubota Y, Shimizu Y, Shibata M, Morotomi N:

action. Neurophysiol Clin 2012, 42:337-344. Association of sleep sufficiency and duration with chronic

pain prevalence: a population-based cross-sectional study. J

19. Lechinger J, Heib DPJ, Gruber W, Schabus M, Klimesch W: Psychosom Res 2019, 120:74-80.

Heartbeat-related EEG amplitude and phase modulations

from wakefulness to deep sleep: Interactions with sleep 37. Simonelli G, Mantua J, Gad M, St Pierre M, Moore L, Yarnell AM

spindles and slow oscillations. 2015, et al.: Sleep extension reduces pain sensitivity. Sleep Med 2019,

52:1441-1450. 54:172-176.

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2020, 33:1–7 www.sciencedirect.com

Sleep and interoception Wei and Van Someren 7

38. Weber M, Webb CA, Deldonno SR, Kipman M, Schwab ZJ, 54. te Lindert BHW, Itzhacki J, van der Meijden WP, Kringelbach ML,

Weiner MR et al.: Habitual ‘sleep credit’ is associated with Mendoza J, Van Someren EJW: Bright environmental light

greater grey matter volume of the medial prefrontal cortex, ameliorates deficient subjective ‘liking in insomnia: an

higher emotional intelligence and better mental health. J Sleep experience sampling study. Sleep 2018, 41:zsy022.

Res 2013, 22:527-534.

55. Van Someren EJW, Dekker K, te Lindert BHW, Benjamins JS,

39. Finan PH, Goodin BR, Smith MT: The association of sleep and Moens S, Migliorati F et al.: The experienced temperature

pain: an update and a path forward. J Pain 2013, 14:1539-1552. sensitivity and regulation survey. Temperature 2016, 3:59-76.

40. Buchanan DT, Cain K, Heitkemper M, Burr R, Vitiello MV, Zia J et al.: 56. Wei Y, Ramautar JR, Colombo MA, Stoffers D, Go´ mez-Herrero G,

Sleep measures predict next-day symptoms in women with van der Meijden WP et al.: I keep a close watch on this heart of

irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med 2014, 10:1003-1009. mine: increased interoception in insomnia. Sleep 2016,

39:2113-2124.

41. Finan PH: Sleep, pain, and the problem with treating sleep to

relieve pain. Sleep Med 2018, 52:211-212. 57. Wei Y, Ramautar JR, Colombo MA, te Lindert BHW, Van

Someren EJW: EEG microstates indicate heightened somatic

´

42. Sivertsen B, Lallukka T, Petrie KJ, Steingrı´msdo´ ttir OA,

awareness in insomnia: toward objective assessment of

Stubhaug A, Nielsen CS: Sleep and pain sensitivity in adults.

subjective mental content. Front Psychiatry 2018, 9:395.

Pain 2015, 156:1433-1439.

58. Wei Y, Bresser T, Wassing R, Stoffers D, Van Someren EJW,

43. Ewing DL, Manassei M, Gould van Praag C, Philippides AO,

Foster-Dingley JC: Brain structural connectivity network

Critchley HD, Garfinkel SN: Sleep and the heart: interoceptive

alterations in insomnia disorder reveal a central role of the

differences linked to poor experiential sleep quality in

right angular gyrus. NeuroImage Clin 2019, 24:102019.

and depression. Biol Psychol 2017, 127:163-172.

59. Altena E, Vrenken H, Van Der Werf YD, van den Heuvel OA, Van

44. Mathias JL, Cant ML, Burke ALJ: Sleep disturbances and sleep

Someren EJW: Reduced orbitofrontal and parietal gray matter

 disorders in adults living with chronic pain: a meta-analysis.

in chronic insomnia: a voxel-based morphometric study. Biol

Sleep Med 2018, 52:198-210.

Psychiatry 2010, 67:182-185.

A meta-analysis of polysomnographic measures and prevalence of diag-

nosed comorbid sleep disorders among patients with chronic pain. 60. Seo J, Moore KN, Gazecki S, Bottary RM, Milad MR, Song H et al.:

Delayed fear extinction in individuals with insomnia disorder.

45. Cremaschi RC, Hirotsu C, Tufik S, Coelho FM: Chronic pain in

Sleep 2018, 41:zsy095.

narcolepsy type 1 and type 2—an underestimated reality. J

Sleep Res 2019, 28:e12715. 61. Wassing R, Benjamins JS, Talamini LM, Schalkwijk F, Van

Someren EJW: Overnight worsening of emotional distress

46. Harvey AG: A cognitive model of insomnia. Behav Res Ther

indicates maladaptive sleep in insomnia. Sleep 2019, 42:

2002, 40:869-893. zsy268.

47. Espie CA, Broomfield NM, MacMahon KMA, Macphee LM,

62. Wassing R, Schalkwijk F, Lakbila-Kamal O, Ramautar JR,

Taylor LM: The attention–intention–effort pathway in the

Stoffers D, Mutsaerts HJMM et al.: Haunted by the past: old

development of psychophysiologic insomnia: a theoretical

remain salient in insomnia disorder. Brain 2019,

review. Sleep Med Rev 2006, 10:215-245. 142:1783-1796.

48. Nicassio PM, Mendlowitz DR, Fussell JJ, Petras L: The

63. Wassing R, Benjamins JS, Dekker K, Moens S, Spiegelhalder K,

phenomenology of the pre-sleep state: the development of the

Feige B et al.: Slow dissolving of emotional distress contributes

Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale. Behav Res Ther 1985, 23:263-271.

to hyperarousal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016, 113:2538-2543.

49. Jansson-Fro¨ jmark M, Harvey AG, Norell-Clarke A, Linton SJ:

64. Tsai Y-J, Ramar K, Liang Y-J, Chiu P-H, Powell N, Chi C-Y et al.:

Associations between psychological factors and nighttime/

Peripheral neuropathology of the upper airway in obstructive

daytime symptomatology in insomnia. Cogn Behav Ther 2012,

sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep Med Rev 2013, 17:161-168.

41:273-287.

65. Patel JA, Ray BJ, Fernandez-Salvador C, Gouveia C, Zaghi S,

50. Puzino K, Amatrudo G, Sullivan A, Vgontzas AN, Fernandez-

Camacho M: Neuromuscular function of the soft palate and

Mendoza J: Clinical significance and cut-off scores for the Pre-

uvula in snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic

Sleep Arousal Scale in chronic insomnia disorder: a replication

review. Am J Otolaryngol 2018, 39:327-337.

in a clinical sample. Behav Sleep Med (in press, Epub ahead of

print). 66. An Y, Li L, Li Y, Chang W, Chen S, Gao F et al.: Quantitative

evaluation of the function of the sensory nerve fibers of the

51. Raymann RJEM, Van Someren EJW: Diminished capability to

palate in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep

recognize the optimal temperature for sleep initiation may

Med 2019, 15:1347-1353.

contribute to poor sleep in elderly people. Sleep 2008, 31:1301-

1309. 67. Seok HY, Do SY, Motamedi GK, Cho YW: Symptom-related

changes in current perception threshold of restless legs

52. Pipinis E, Melynyte S, Koenig T, Jarutyte L, Linkenkaer-Hansen K,

syndrome. J Sleep Res 2019:e12890. Epub ahead of print.

Ruksenas O et al.: Association between resting-state

microstates and ratings on the Amsterdam Resting-State 68. Dafkin C, McKinon W, Kerr S: Restless legs syndrome: clinical

Questionnaire. Brain Topogr 2017, 30:245-248. changes in nervous system excitability at the level.

Sleep Med Rev 2019, 47:9-17.

53. Palagini L, Cellini N, Mauri M, Mazzei I, Simpraga S, Dell’Osso L

et al.: Multiple phenotypes of resting-state cognition are 69. Filingeri D: Neurophysiology of skin thermal sensations. Compr

altered in insomnia disorder. Sleep Heal 2016, 2:239-245. Physiol 2016, 6:1429-1491.

www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2020, 33:1–7