For Official Use Only

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For Official Use Only Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No.: PAD1551 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF €25 MILLION Public Disclosure Authorized (US$28.038 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA FOR A SECOND MUNICIPAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOVEMBER 19, 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Social, Urban, Rural & Resilience Global Practice Europe And Central Asia This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective as of September 30, 2015) Currency Unit = Macedonian denar (MKD) €1 = US$1.12 = MKD54.92 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CPS Country Partnership Strategy CSE Communal Service Enterprise DA Designated Account DWP Danube Water Program EA Environmental Assessment EAMF Environmental Assessment Management Framework EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EU European Union FM Financial Management FYR Former Yugoslav Republic GRS Grievance Redress Service IFR Interim Un-audited Financial Report IPA Instrument Pre-accession LARPF Land Acquisition and Resettlement Policy Framework M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MBDP Macedonian Bank for Development Promotion MOF Ministry of Finance MSIP Municipal Services Improvement Project MSIP2 Second Municipal Services Improvement Project NBRM National Bank of Republic of Macedonia O&M Operation and Maintenance PAD Project Appraisal Document PCC Project Coordination Committee PDO Project Development Objective PMU Project Management Unit POM Project Operational Manual RPF Resettlement Policy Framework TA Technical Assistance UPP Urban Partnership Program Regional Vice President: Cyril E. Muller Country Director: Ellen A. Goldstein Senior Global Practice Director: Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Practice Manager: David N. Sislen Task Team Leader: Toshiaki Keicho TABLE OF CONTENTS I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT .......................................................................................... 1 A. Country Context ............................................................................................................ 1 B. Situations of Urgent Need of Assistance or Capacity Constraints (if applicable) ........ 2 C. Sectoral and Institutional Context ................................................................................. 2 D. Higher Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes .......................................... 3 II. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ......................................................... 4 A. PDO............................................................................................................................... 4 Project Beneficiaries ........................................................................................................... 4 PDO Level Results Indicators ............................................................................................. 4 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................... 5 A. Project Components ...................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Financing .......................................................................................................... 7 C. Series of Project Objective and Phases ......................................................................... 8 D. Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design .................................................. 8 IV. IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................ 8 A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements .......................................................... 8 B. Results Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................ 10 C. Sustainability............................................................................................................... 10 V. KEY RISKS ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Overall Risk Rating and Explanation of Key Risks.................................................... 11 VI. APPRAISAL SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 12 A. Economic and Financial (if applicable) Analysis ....................................................... 12 B. Technical ..................................................................................................................... 14 C. Financial Management ................................................................................................ 14 D. Procurement ................................................................................................................ 15 E. Social (including Safeguards) ..................................................................................... 16 F. Environment (including Safeguards) .......................................................................... 18 G. Other Safeguards Policies Triggered .......................................................................... 19 H. World Bank Grievance Redress .................................................................................. 20 Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring ........................................................................ 21 Annex 2: Detailed Project Description ...................................................................................... 26 Annex 3: Implementation Arrangements ................................................................................. 31 Annex 4: Implementation Support Plan ................................................................................... 44 Annex 5: MAP ............................................................................................................................. 46 PAD DATA SHEET Macedonia, former Yugoslav Republic of Second Municipal Services Improvement Project (P154464) PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT . EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA GSU09 Report No.: PAD1551 Basic Information Project ID EA Category Team Leader(s) P154464 B - Partial Assessment Toshiaki Keicho Lending Instrument Fragile and/or Capacity Constraints [ ] Investment Project Financing Financial Intermediaries [ ] Series of Projects [ ] Project Implementation Start Date Project Implementation End Date 01-Apr-2016 30-Sep-2020 Expected Effectiveness Date Expected Closing Date 31-Mar-2016 31-Mar-2021 Joint IFC No Practice Senior Global Practice Country Director Regional Vice President Manager/Manager Director David N. Sislen Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez Ellen A. Goldstein Cyril E Muller . Borrower: Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Responsible Agency: Ministry of Finance Contact: Suzana Peneva Title: State Advisor Telephone No.: 389 3 255 373 Email: [email protected] . Project Financing Data(in US$, millions) [ X ] Loan [ ] IDA Grant [ ] Guarantee [ ] Credit [ ] Grant [ ] Other Total Project Cost: 28.04 Total Bank Financing: 28.04 Financing Gap: 0.00 . Financing Source Amount Borrower 0.00 i International Bank for Reconstruction and 28.04 Development Total 28.04 . Expected Disbursements (in US$, millions) Fiscal Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 0000 0000 0000 0000 Annual 0.30 2.50 6.00 8.00 7.67 3.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cumulative 0.30 2.80 8.80 16.80 24.47 28.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . Institutional Data Practice Area (Lead) Social, Urban, Rural & Resilience Global Practice Contributing Practice Areas Water Cross Cutting Topics [ ] Climate Change [ ] Fragile, Conflict & Violence [ ] Gender [ ] Jobs [ ] Public Private Partnership Sectors / Climate Change Sector (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100) Major Sector Sector % Adaptation Mitigation Co- Co-benefits % benefits % Transportation Urban Transport 30 Water, sanitation and flood protection General water, sanitation 20 and flood protection sector Water, sanitation and flood protection Solid waste management 15 Energy and mining Energy efficiency in 15 Heat and Power Public Administration, Law, and Sub-national government 20 Justice administration Total 100 I certify that there is no Adaptation and Mitigation Climate Change Co-benefits information applicable to this project. Themes Theme (Maximum 5 and total % must equal 100) Major theme Theme % Urban development City-wide Infrastructure and Service 60 Delivery Urban development Municipal finance 25 Urban development Municipal governance and institution 15 building Total 100 ii . Proposed Development Objective(s) The proposed development objective of the Second Municipal Services Improvement Project (MSIP2) is to improve transparency, financial sustainability, and inclusive delivery of targeted municipal services in the participating municipalities. Components Component Name Cost (US$, millions) Municipal Investment Subloans 20.76 Poverty and Social Inclusion Investment Grants 5.53 Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation, and 1.68 Capacity Building . Systematic Operations Risk-Rating Tool (SORT) Risk Category Rating 1. Political and Governance Moderate 2. Macroeconomic Moderate 3. Sector Strategies and Policies Low 4. Technical Design of Project or Program Low 5. Institutional Capacity
Recommended publications
  • Rapport DAH Couleur
    City of Skopje PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Reconstruction and rehabilitation of Boris Trajkovski street from Staklara factory to Pintija settlement May 2015 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MUNICIPALITY CITY OF SKOPJE 1. Location map 2. General information Area: 1,818 km2 / 23 km length and 9 km width Latitude: 42°00’ north Longitude: 21°26’ east Elevation: 245 meters Average temperature: 13.5°C / 56°F B. DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC PROFILE 1. Demography of the City of Skopje Table 1: Inhabitants, households, apartments in Skopje Municipality Inhabitants Households Apartments Aerodrom 72,009 21,495 23,754 Butel 36,154 10,056 11,077 Gazi Baba 72,617 20,336 22,815 Gjorche Petrov 41,634 11,886 13,938 Karposh 59,666 19,680 22,849 Kisela Voda 57,236 17,577 20,237 Saraj 35,408 7,972 7,837 Centar 45,412 15,355 18,848 Chair 64,773 17,107 17,127 Shuto Orizari 22,017 5,102 5,263 City of Skopje 506,926 146,566 163,745 Source: 2002 Census, according to the administrative-territorial organization from 2004 2 Table 2: Total inhabitants in Skopje according to five years groups Municipality Total 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 Skopje 506926 30097 32788 35942 38117 40111 39973 38700 36900 35361 Aerodrom 72009 3393 3458 4198 5668 6704 6091 5131 4705 5017 Butel 36514 2239 2557 2639 2740 3029 2844 2759 2659 2563 G.Baba 72617 4582 4913 5141 5280 5742 6090 5560 5240 4989 G.Petrov 41634 2248 2484 2869 3189 3109 3213 3075 2956 3192 Karposh 59666 2837 3142 3550 3760 3657 4030 4741 4671 4228 K.Voda 57236 2843 3361 3794 3886 4008
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Sopiste Municipality Rehabilitation of Various Streets
    PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT SOPISTE MUNICIPALITY REHABILITATION OF VARIOUS STREETS AUGUST 2015 1 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTON A. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MUNICIPALITY Sopiste municipality is located in the central part of Macedonia and covers an area of 253.35km2. Geographically, the municipality occupies the southwestern part of the Skopje Valley, along the Markova Sushica River and its junction with the River Treska, on the slopes of the Vodno Mountain. The physical-geographical conditions within the municipality are extremely variable and some of them (climate, flora and fauna) occur as promoters of development of the settlements, and other (hydrological, hydrographic features) as inhibitors, whereas others show strong variability and polarization (topography, soil) and their impact on human settlements depends on their location. Despite the mountainous character and the peripheral position relative to the Skopje Valley, Sopiste municipality still has a favorable geographical position, due primarily to the immediate vicinity of Skopje. Figure 1: Location of the municipality Sopiste municipality is characterized by a transition between a continental and mountainous climate, with an average annual temperature of 11°C. In terms of precipitation, they are at greater intensity than Skopje valley, ranging between 600 and 1000mm per square meter, depending on the altitude. The average annual insolation is between 45-50%, but in terms of the Skopje Valley it’s significantly greater in December, which is favorable for settlements in this area, due to the southern positioning of Sopiste, hence the warmth of the area. The surface hydrographic network of the municipality’s area is poorly developed, mostly because of the intense process of karstification that engulfed the terrains of Karadzica, Suva Planina and Venec.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on the Functioning of the Public Internal Financial Control
    2019 Ministry of Finance Public Internal Financial Control Department ANNUAL REPORT ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE 2019 PUBLIC INTERNAL FINANCIAL CONTROL SYSTEM Skopje, July 2020 1 CONTENTS Page SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 1.INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 1.1. Legal basis for the preparation of the Annual Report ………………......................................................................5 1.2. Purpose of the Annual Repot............................................................................................................................................6 1.3. Basis for Preparation and Scope of the Annual Report ......................................................................................6 1.4. Submitted 2019 Annual Financial Reports……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 2. STATE OF PLAY OF THE INTERNAL FINANCIAL CONTROL SYSTEM IN 2019……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 2.1. ANALYSIS OF THE QESTIONNAIRE FOR SELF ASSESSMENT OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….........7 A. CONTROL ENVIRONMENT………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 B. RISKNAGEMENT………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 C. CONTROLS……………………………. D. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS ...................................................................................................16 E. MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT OF THE SYSTEM.................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on Hate Crime 2019 2
    ANNUAL REPORT ON HATE CRIME in 2019 The content of this publication does not necessarily represent the views or the position of the OSCE Mission to Skopje. Publisher: Helsinki Committee for Human Rights represented by President Prof. Dr. Gordan Kalajdziev Editor: Uranija Pirovska Authors: Sibel Amet Sanja Barlakovska Velkov Naum Naumovski Borche 83 1000, Skopje Tel: +389 (0)2 3119 073 Fax: +389 (0)2 3290 469 Web: www.mhc.org.mk Е-mail: [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1. ABOUT THE PROJECT ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Monitoring the national printed and electronic media ............................................................................. 5 2.2. Reporting hate crimes and hate incidents to the OSCE Mission to Skopje ............................................. 5 2.3. Maintaining an interactive website for hate crime reporting ................................................................... 5 3. SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS .............................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Context ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Number of incidents .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GI 26.07.2018 FINAL EN Za
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE FUNCTIONING OF PUBLIC INTERNAL FINANCIAL CONTROLCONTROL SYSTEM Skopje, July 2018 1 CONTENTS SUMMARY …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 444 111.1... INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5555 1.1. Legal Basis for Preparation of the Annual Report ... ...................................................................................... 5 1.2. Purpose of the Annual Report..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3. Submitted 2017 Annual Financial Reports ……………………………....................................................................... 6 222.2. REPORT ON QUALITY AND STATUS OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENMANAGEMENTT AND CONTROLCONTROL............7777 2.1. Current state of play as regards financial management and control at central level...................... 7 2.2. Current state of play as regards financial management and control at local level........................... 7 2.3. Establishment of Decentralized System of Financial Management and Control...............................8 2.4. Achieved Progress in Financial Management and Control at Central and Local Level Compared to the Previous
    [Show full text]
  • Invitation for Presentation of the Green Cities Facility and Exploring the Possibilities for Municipal Project Proposals
    Green Cities Facility |European Bank for Reconstruction and Development| Green Climate Fund Invitation for presentation of the Green Cities Facility and exploring the possibilities for municipal project proposals Location: Ceremonial hall, Government of the Republic of North Macedonia Date: 14.11.2019, Thursday Time: 10:00 – 11:30 a.m. Language: Macedonian/English Background The EBRD Green Cities Facility strives to build a better and more sustainable future for cities and their residents. The Facility achieves this by identifying, prioritising and connecting cities’ environmental challenges with sustainable infrastructure investments and policy measures. The ultimate goal of the Facility is to deliver transformational change in municipal approaches to climate change planning underpinned by financial support for identified priority infrastructure investments. Skopje, the political, cultural and economic centre of the Republic of North Macedonia joined EBRD Green Cities in March 2019 with the aim of introducing its own urban greening Programme. Through committing to a Green Cities Action Plan (GCAP) the city will take a systematic approach to address its urban environmental challenges. The Facility will support the implementation of climate-focused infrastructure investment projects in beneficiary cities, which directly target cities’ climate challenges identified through the GCAPs. These projects will lower greenhouse gas emissions and increase the climate resilience of urban services in the region, while helping cities reach their targets set in the GCAPs. The Facility’s investments will focus on issues in urban infrastructure in sectors such as public transport, building energy efficiency, water and wastewater management, solid waste, district heating, municipal energy systems, street lighting and roads. Presentation participants 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal STATUTE of the Doctor's Chamber of Macedonia, Adopted by the Assembly of the Doctor's Chamber of Macedonia
    Proposal STATUTE of the Doctor's Chamber of Macedonia, adopted by the Assembly of the Doctor's Chamber of Macedonia (REVISED TEXT) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 The Doctor's Chamber of Macedonia (hereinafter: the Chamber) is an independent and professional organization of all doctors of medicine who perform medical profession as a profession on the territory of the Republic of Macedonia. The Chamber is established with the aim of protecting and promoting the expertise and ethical duties and rights of doctors in medicine, improving the quality of health care, monitoring the attitude of health workers towards society and citizens, protecting the rights and professional interests of doctors of medicine that are its members and take care of the dignity, reputation, integrity and promotion of the overall Medical profession and its proper and honest performance. Article 1- a This Statute regulates: 1. the name and the seat of the Chamber; 2. goals and tasks of the Chamber; 3. the bodies of the Chamber, the procedure for their election, namely, the appointing and reasons and the manner of their dismissal, i.e. revocation, their composition, their competences and the manner of their decision-making; 4. persons representing the Chamber in legal transactions; 5. the rights, obligations and responsibilities of the members of the Chamber and their representatives in the bodies of the Chamber; 6. the manner of providing the funds necessary for the performance of the tasks of the Chamber; 7. the manner and procedure for determining the membership fee and the criteria for its determination; 8. the tasks of the Chamber financed by the membership fee; 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Wastewater Management in Skopje SOCIAL SURVEY
    Table of Contents APPENDIX 10 SURVEYS ········································································A10-1 10.1 Social Survey..............................................................................................................A10-1 10.2 Water Quality Survey ...............................................................................................A10-53 10.3 Industry Survey ......................................................................................................A10-126 10.4 IEE..........................................................................................................................A10-161 Appendix 10, Part I (B/P) Wastewater Management in Skopje APPENDIX 10 SURVEYS 10.1 Social Survey Part I: A10-1 Part I: A10-2 Project: Study on Wastewater Management in Skopje SOCIAL SURVEY FINAL REPORT Map of municipalities in Skopje January, 2008 Skopje Part I: A10-3 Client : Japan International Cooperation Agency Project : Study on Wastewater Management in Skopje File : Report on Social Survey Length of report : 33 pages Author : N. Bakreska Kormusoska; A. Ilievska; Contributions : S. Kostovska, I. Bakreska O. Krstevska, A. Bekir, A. Adnan, D. Sazdovska, A. Beljulji Date : 29 October 2008 Part I: A10-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 4 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. OBJECTIVE OF THE SURVEY 4 3. ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE SOCIAL SURVEY 5 4. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 5 4.1. Social Survey implementation 5 4.2. Water utilization survey implementation 7 5. RESPONSES 8 6. RESULTS 8 6.1 Results of the Social Survey
    [Show full text]
  • Izvestaj-Za-Rabota-2005.Pdf
    MISIJA Krajna cel na Crven krst na grad Skopje e podobruvawe na `ivotot na ranlivite kategorii lica i promovirawe na human- ite vrednosti i humanitarnoto pravo. Strate{ki celi na Crven krst na grad Skopje: L Promovirawe na Osnovnite principi i humanite vrednosti na Dvi`eweto na Crveniot krst i Crvenata polumese~ina L Podgotvenost i deluvawe pri katastrofi L Obezbeduvawe na humanitarna i socijalna pomo{ na naselenieto L Zdravstvena gri`a preku za{tita na `ivotot, zdravjeto i ~ovekovoto dostoinstvo L Po~it kon lu|eto, nediskriminira- nost vrz osnova na nacionalna pripadnost, rasa, pol, versko ili politi~ko ubeduvawe L Razvivawe i masovnost na volonterskata slu`ba KOJ E VOLONTER VO CRVENIOT KRST? OSNOVNI PRINCIPI Volonter na Crveniot krst e lice rakovodeno od svojata slobod- NA DVI@EWETO na `elba da obavuva volonterska dejnost so koja }e pridonesuva za podobru- vawe na `ivotot na ranlivoto naselenie. Rabotata na volonterot e bez finansiski i materijalen na do mes - HUMANOST tok i se temeli vrz osnovnite principi na Crveniot krst i Crvenata polu - mese~ina. Me|unarodnoto dvi`ewe na Crveniot krst i Crvenata polumese~ina nastana kako rezultat na `elbata da im se pomogne na ranetite na bojnoto pole i toa bez bilo kakva pristrasnost, kako i da VIE MO@ETE DA DONESETE PROMENI go spre~i i olesni ~ovekovoto stradawe sekoga{ koga e toa mo`no. Celta na dvi`eweto e da go za{titi `ivotot i zdravjeto i da go po~ituva Blagodarenie na humanosta na lu|eto, Crveniot krst pomaga za ~ovekot. Promovira zaedni~ko razbirawe, prija- podobruvawe na `ivotot na ranlivoto naselenie (lica koi `iveat vo te{ki telstvo, sorabotka i traen mir me|u site lu|e.
    [Show full text]
  • 11945227 03.Pdf
    Table of Contents APPENDIX 4 WATERQUALITY ANALYSIS·········································A4-1 4.1 Self-purification Rate of Vardar River ............................................................................... A4-1 Appendix 4, Part I (B/P) Wastewater Management in Skopje APPENDIX 4 WATERQUALITY ANALYSIS 4.1 Self-purification Rate of Vardar River The pollution load runoff to the Vardar River (i.e., pollution load entering the Vardar River) is naturally purified while it flows down the Vardar River. BOD concentration decreases as explained below according to the Streeter-Phelps. The pollution load runoff that enters the Vardar River is naturally purified while it flows along the main river. BOD concentration decreases as given below according to the Streeter-Phelps. Decreasing Reduction Rate of BOD: dC/dt = - K・C C: BOD concentration (mg/l), t: time (day), K: self-purification constant (1/day) The self-purification constant k of the Vardar River through the Skopje City is estimated to be 1.46 (1/day), based on the water quality data at Vlae Bridge and Taor monitoring stations. For the runoff coefficient and calculation methods, see Table 4.1. Part I: A4-1 Purification Coefficient Accumuloation Travel Pollution Load Vardar Purification Location Flow rate BOD NODE Sampling Point Length Velocity time Vardar Inlet Net Net BOD coefficient (km) (km) (m/s) (d) (m3/s) (mg/l) (kg/d) (kg/d) (kg/d) (mg/l) (k) Table 4.1 Calculate of Purification Coefficient N1 Vlae Bridge 202.000 18.230 0.800 0.098 19.600 1.51 2,557 R1 Lepenece River (MP4)
    [Show full text]
  • City of Skopje Guide for Investors
    FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE YOUTH EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS NETWORK Град Скопје CITY OF SKOPJE GUIDE FOR INVESTORS 1 Skopje, 2015 City of Skopje Proposer: Koce Trajanovski, The Mayor of the City od Skopje Preparation: Sector fot Local Economic Development Representative: Slobodan Kosev, Head of the Sector for Local Economic Development Design and print: Evropa 92 Skopje,2015 2 This publication has been fi nanced by the American people, through the United States Agency for FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE International Development – USAID Macedonia, within YOUTH EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS NETWORK the Youth Employability Skills Network (YES Network) Project , implemented by the Education Development Center (EDC). The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily refl ect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Table of contents Forewords .................................................................................................................................................6 1. Profile of the Republic of Macedonia ...................................................................................................7 2. Profile of the City of Skopje .................................................................................................................8 2.1. Geographic data .......................................................................................................................8 2.2. Demographic data ....................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]