DOCSLIB.ORG

Small Group Reading Instruction Walker

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Small Group Reading Instruction Walker 4/26/16 Small Group Instruction Instead of focusing on the ‘average,’ it is my belief that we must build a system of opportunity focused on the Welcome! individual potential of each of our students. Our work is not centered on moving students up to the ‘average’ but instead focused on moving the entire Choose a phrase that ‘average’ up in all of schools across the district by banning ‘average’ thinking speaks to you. and demanding we design our learning environment to the edges of student potential, nurturing and growing each and Take a moment to write it every one of our students. down. -Shay Mikalson Superintendent Bend LaPine Schools Poll Everywhere Steps: 1. Create new text message to: 37607 2. In text box, text: jennmontoya090 3. You will get a text that says, “you have joined Jenn Montoya’s session. .” 4. Now type in your phrase from previous slide and send Example: banning-average-thinking -no spaces, no capitals, use lines between words 4. Check in with neighbor, they may need some help. 1 4/26/16 1. differentiated/targeted instruction 2. scaffold or enhance our instruction 3. pre-teaching 4. re-teaching the why of 5. extending small groups the wizard and the wand 2 4/26/16 Scaffolded Reading Jigsaw • Work in groups of 4 • Each person chooses one of the following principle elements to read, take notes and share on: • (a) The student, not the teacher is the reader • (b) Small groups differentiate support • (c) Students have different strengths and supports • (d) Grouping patterns change frequently. • Read for 5 minutes. Write down salient points on the graphic organizer to share 3 4/26/16 “It is about the reader. How is what I am doing helping this child move forward as a reader?” Regie Routman Test Placement based on data. (DIBELS, weekly assessment, diagnostic assessment, phonics screener, listening to conversations, reading annotations, and adjusting instruction to meet the needs or your students) Target Why is this student in this scaffolded reading group? What is the goal? Time 10-15 minutes Teach Identify level of support needed (lean to heavy) You are the coach (we do) Prompts and cues are utilized Texts Instructional level or above and depends on the purpose Talk Collaborative conversations are built into the lesson in order to move students towards independence Tasks Annotation, stickies, stop and jot, graphic organizers, summaries Tech Technology is used to enhance, reinforce and enrich the target/purpose of the group 8 Ts of Small Group Instruction 4 4/26/16 Why Test and Target… …because we want to effectively use our assessment data to group students and target our instruction around their 1 & 2 needs. Test and “The purpose of scaffolded reading instruction is to Target deliver customized lessons based on recent assessment information.” –Rigorous Reading Start with their temperature… 5 4/26/16 Divide and Decide • Weed out accuracy versus fluency. • Was a phonics screener administered on these students? • What holes? Phonics Screener Example 6 4/26/16 K-2 Grouping Ideas Grouping Ideas # Names Focus Materials 1 AG, RM, LP Phonics and application to text Templates, decodables, -increased scaffolding anthology, main selection 2 AR, ZR, DS Phonics and application to text Templates and decodables, -increased scaffolding anthology, main selection 3 TD, EF, MH, MK, CS Blending and application to text Templates, decodables, -less scaffolding anthology, main selection 4 JC, CM, KM, JH Blending and application to text Templates and decodables, -less scaffolding anthology, main selection 5 NB, GH, RH, GM, CP, GR Application of reading strategies in text On level or beyond level reader, -anticipate stuck points- add scaffolding trade books, anthology, main as needed selection 7 4/26/16 3-5 Grouping Ideas Grouping Ideas # Names Focus Materials 1 LC, MM, AP, JS, Accuracy to fluency to Templates (phonics screener) DR comprehension decodables, main selection, anthology 2 BN, RM, PS, PP, Accuracy to fluency to Templates (phonics screener) NLL comprehension decodables, main selection, anthology 3 PG, AR, CM, AS, fluency to comprehension Fluency teaching in on-level passage, JR main selection, anthology 4 AV, ID, AF, MF, Comprehension- application of On or beyond leveled reader, main CG, LH, QR skills and strategies selection, anthology 5 DC, TP Comprehension extension of Beyond level reader, main selection, reading strategies anthology 8 4/26/16 How much time? Who gets the most time? 3 time 45 min Scheduling MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 4 2 2 3 5 5 4 3 This schedule assumes: • 45 minutes of time for small group instruction a day • Most needy sees the teacher most often • 10-15 minute groups • If you have more groups, consider using intervention block to meet with higher level groups (this does not replace core time) 9 4/26/16 30 min Scheduling MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY 1 3 1 3 1 2 4 2 4 2 5 5 This schedule assumes: • 30 minutes of time for small group instruction a day • Most needy sees the teacher most often • Groups are 10-15 minutes, Tuesday/Thursday 3 group days, so plan for a little less whole group on those days How do we make decisions about learning goals and objectives? How do we choose texts to support 4 & 5 our readers’ learning? Teach and Texts 10 4/26/16 Teaching with Complex Text 1. Kids need to be reading 2. Don’t be bound by reading levels 3. Vary difficulty and length 4. Give help when help is needed 5. Ask questions to scaffold students into text meaning 6. Reread, reread and reread -taken from Shanahan article – link to article 11 4/26/16 What is the purpose of this group? How will they read the text? Accuracy (moving to fluency moving to comp) K-1st read during the group 2nd -5th initial teacher support with first chapter Independent application following group Fluency group (moving to comp) Pre-read book (independently or with partner) Re-read sections, lines of practice during group Close read with lens/purpose in group Independent application following group Comprehension group Pre-read book (independently or with partner) Close read with lens/purpose in group Independent application following group 12 4/26/16 What is the lens that students are reading through? What is the teaching point? What do the standards say? Link to the progressions What is the lens that students are reading through? What is the teaching point? Merge the strategy with the skill Use the same teaching point from whole group small group independent tasks 13 4/26/16 What will be difficult for students (stuck points)? -vocab -language -sentence structure -genre -text organization -text features -background knowledge What level of support do the kids in this group need? How will you use prompts and cues to scaffold the work? 14 4/26/16 Prompts and Cues When prompts and cues do not resolve errors or misconceptions provide a direct explanation. What questions will you ask to check for understanding? DOK Focused questions on your teaching point. What are they close reading for? What is their lens? Text dependent questions Think DOK level 15 4/26/16 How will you know if students learned the skill/strategy? Formative vs summative Exit slips Standards progressions Listening to conversations Anecdotal data Can they do it independently? day Accu r a cy Group with Accuracy Needs 1. lines of practice accuracy accuracy -words 1 -high fr e qu e n cy w or ds 2. shared read -focus on strategy and skill SOUNDS LIKE: 1. lines of practice -high frequency words • -words or phrases taken from WHISPER READING follow in g t e xt 2 • (BUMPY/SMOOTH) 2. decodable reader, approaching reader, or main selection fluency • PRODUCTIVE STRUGGLE -focus on strategy and skill • LIMITED CHORAL READING *reread for fluency during independent tasks • IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK 1. lines of practice -words or phrases taken from • MULTIPLE OPPORTUNITIES TO RESPOND follow in g t e xt -focu s on flu e n cy skill- week • PHONICS SUPPORT 3 2. decodable reader, approaching reader, or main selection • CLOSE READING FOR COMPREHENSION comprehension -focus on strategy and skill 1. lines of practice -phrases for fluency 2. opt ions: -reread approaching level or 4 decodable for flu e n cy -focus on strategy and skill 3. formative assessment 16 4/26/16 Accuracy Video Look-Fors Clear teaching point Phonics skill focus Corrective feedback Time in text Student, not the teacher, is the reader Productive struggle Perky pace I do, We do, You do accuracy video day Fluency Group with Fluency Needs Must do: -read on-level book before 1 group (fluency focus) SOUNDS LIKE: 1. lines of practice • fluency MODELING FLUENCY SKILLS -phrases from text (EXPRESSION, PHRASING, ETC.) 2. close read with on-level bo ok • REPEATED READING OF or main selection 3. -focus on skill and strategy FAMILIAR TEXT TO INCREASE COMPREHENSION Must do: 1. read paired read before • CLOSE READ FOR TARGETED 2 group (fluency focus) COMPREHENSION SKILLS AND 2. write about reading STRATEGIES comprehension -focus on skill and strategy • CHORAL READING A SECTION OF FAMILIAR TEXT WITH A 1. lines of practice -phrases from text PURPOSE 3 2. close read with text -focus on skill and strategy 1. level-up to more challenging text 4 2. formative assessment 17 4/26/16 Fluency Video Look-Fors Clear teaching point Bumpy/Smooth Fluency focus I do, We do, You do, Fast mapping of vocab Perky pace Repetition of skill practice Corrective feedback Time in text Text dependent questions Fluency video day Comprehension Comprehension Group Must do: 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building the Foundation for Close Reading with Developing Readers
    BUILDING THE FOUNDATION FOR CLOSE READING WITH DEVELOPING READERS SHEILA F. BAKER AND LILLIAN MCENERY ABSTRACT Close Reading utilizes several strategies to help readers think more critically about a text. Close reading can be performed within the context of shared readings, read-alouds by the teacher, literature discussion groups, and guided reading groups. Students attempting to more closely read difficult texts may benefit from technologies and platforms that support their diverse reading levels, abilities, and special needs during close reading activities. The authors identify technologies which enable teachers to embed multimedia, interactive activities, and questions and activities that promote critical thinking and which guide readers to take a closer look at the content of their texts. Close reading is a term that has been with us for some time. As early as 1838, Horace Mann wrote, I have devoted especial pains to learn, with some degree of numerical accuracy, how far the reading, in our schools, is an exercise of the mind in thinking and feeling and how far it is a barren action of the organs of speech upon the atmosphere (p, 531).....The result is, that more than eleven-twelfths of all the children in the reading classes, in our schools, do not understand the meaning of the words they read; that they do not master the sense of the reading-lessons, and that the ideas and feelings intended by the author to be conveyed to, and excited in, the reader’s mind, still rest in the author’s intention, never having yet reached the place of their destination (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Print ED376490.TIF
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 376 490 CS 214 616 AUTHOR Westcott, Warren, Ed.; Westcott, Holly Ed. TITLE Carolina English Teacher 1994/1995. INSTITUTION South Carolina Council of Teachers ef English, Columbia. PUB DATE 94 NOTE 60p.; For 1992/ 1993 edition, see ED 359 543. PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT Carolina English Teacher; 1994-95 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS American Indian Literature; Childrens Literature; *Cultural Differences; Elementary Secondary Education; English Curriculum; English Instruction; Higher Education; Literature Appreciation; Multicultural Education; *Peer Evaluation; *Peer Groups; *Writing (Composition); *Writing Instruction IDENTIFIERS Winthrop College SC ABSTRACT This journal contains a wide ranging collection of articles on teaching English at all levels. Articles include: "Why Can't My Students Do It My Way?" (Thomas C. Thompson); "The First Step Is Fluency: An Interview with Richard Marius" (Carroll Viera); "Teaching Writing: The Dilemma" (Janet Sanner); "Teaching American Indian Literatures in South Carolina's Classrooms" (Jim Charles); "The World of Children's Literature: Tht Eleanor Burts Collr-tion at Winthrop University" (Terry L. Norton and Ron Chepsiuk); "Bridging Cultures Through Literature" (Ron Carter); "Communicating With Supervisors: Teaching Reading, Writing, Speaking, Viewing, and Listening in Applied Communications" (Janet T. Atkins); "Does Participation in a Writing Institute Have Lasting Effect on Teaching Behaviors and Continued Learning of Former Participants?" (Nell Braswell and Joye P. Berman); "Reading Closely and Reading Widely: Recent Young Adult Novels for Middle School" (Harriett Williams); and "Dialogic Feelings: Feeling in Composition and Culture" (John Paul Tassoni). Three book reviews conclude the journal. (TB) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Fiction-Based Close Reading Experiences for the High School English Language Arts Classroom
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2015 Designing Fiction-Based Close Reading Experiences For The iH gh School English Language Arts Classroom Aubrey Jean Mcnary Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Mcnary, Aubrey Jean, "Designing Fiction-Based Close Reading Experiences For The iH gh School English Language Arts Classroom" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 1811. https://commons.und.edu/theses/1811 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright 2015 Aubrey McNary ii PERMISSION Title Designing Fiction-Based Close Reading Experiences for the High School English Language Arts Classroom Department Teaching and Learning Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make if freely available for inspection. I further agree that the permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in her absence, by the chairperson of the department or the dean of the School of Graduate Studies. It is understood that any copying or publication or other use of this thesis or part thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Reading As an Intervention for Struggling Middle School Readers
    FEATURE ARTICLE Close Reading as an Intervention for Struggling Middle School Readers D o u g l a s F i s h e r & N a n c y F r e y An after- school reading intervention made a difference for struggling middle school students. But what made the difference? Close reading, peer collaboration, and wide reading of young adult literature. ized intensive reading interventions in groups of two housands of adolescents across the world are to four students. According to the researchers’ find- participating in a wide range of intervention ings, participants “demonstrated significantly higher efforts designed to improve their literacy scores than comparison students on standardized mea- Tachievement (Calhoon, Scarborough, & Miller, 2013 ). sures of comprehension (effect size = 1.20) and word These efforts include additional classes during the identification (effect size = 0.49), although most con- regular school day, after school, and in summer pro- tinued to lack grade- level proficiency in reading de- grams, as well as computerized interventions (Hartry, spite three years of intervention” (p. 515). Cantrell Fitzgerald, Porter, 2008 ; Soper & Marquis- Cox, 2012 ). and colleagues ( 2010 ) reported on a reading interven- Given that millions of dollars are spent each year fo- tion effort focused on comprehension strategy instruc- cused on students who have fallen behind their peers tion, the Learning Strategies Curriculum, which is in literacy development, the effectiveness of these part of the Strategies Intervention Model (Tralli, intervention efforts is an important consideration. Colombo, Deshler, & Schumaker, 1996 ). This study Thankfully, evidence suggests that reading focused on word identification, vocabulary, visualiz- interventions with adolescents can be effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Reading & Text Complexity
    Close Reading & Text Complexity Selecting the best texts and strategies to engage and challenge our students. First Impressions Lisa Jones-Farkas Handouts Reading Coach @ Brandon Blue: Note-taking sheet High School; Hillsborough Cream: Text Complexity County Schools Email: Goldenrod: Word [email protected] Questioning Agenda: Green: Charting the Text Text Complexity Overview & White: PowerPoint Tools and Close-Reading Yellow: Doug Fisher Overview & Strategies for the classroom article Please read Order of Importance: through the • Ask text-dependent characteristics of questions close reading and • Establish a purpose for place them in reading order of importance. Most • Encourage text marking important at the • Select text of appropriate top and least at size & complexity the bottom. • Check for understanding • Provide discussion time • Engaging text for students Order will • Select text of appropriate vary… size • Establish a purpose for Just be sure to reading remember these • Provide discussion time key factors when • Encourage text marking choosing texts and strategies • Check for understanding for close reading. • Engaging text for students • Asking text-dependent questions Today’s Focus: Power Standards Text Complexity is: “The inherent difficulty of reading and comprehending a text combined with consideration of reader and task variables; in the Standards, a three-part assessment of text difficulty that pairs qualitative and quantitative measures with reader-task considerations.” CCSS Appendix A Measuring Text Complexity • Quantitative measures look at factors impacting “readability” as measured by particular computer programs. • Qualitative measures examine levels of meaning, knowledge demands, language features, text structure, and use of graphics as measured by an attentive reader. • Reader and Task considers additional “outside” factors that might impact the difficulty of reading the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Reading and Far-Reaching Classroom Discussion: Fostering a Vital Connection
    Close Reading and Far-Reaching Classroom Discussion: Fostering a Vital Connection by Catherine Snow Graduate School of Education, Harvard University Catherine O’Connor School of Education, Boston University September 13, 2013 A Policy Brief from the Literacy Research Panel of the International Reading Association Close Reading and Far-Reaching Classroom Discussion: Fostering a Vital Connection by Catherine Snow Graduate School of Education, Harvard University Catherine O’Connor School of Education, Boston University One of the widespread anticipatory reactions to the texts (Pearson, 2013). Those practices include, in the Common Core State Standards is a new emphasis in elementary grades, considerable anticipatory work before guidance to practitioners on “close reading” (Brown & the texts are broached. Kappes, 2012). Close reading is an approach to teaching For example, a familiar approach to illustrated narrative comprehension that insists students extract meaning from texts is to start with a ‘picture walk’ (Clay, 1991; Fountas & text by examining carefully how language is used in the Pinell, 1996), constructing the story from the pictures passage itself. It stems from the observation that many before considering the text. This practice is assumed to students emerging from the K-12 world are not ready to pique students’ interest and to build their abilities to predict engage with complex text of the kind they must work with and interpret—useful capacities, but no reason to limit in college. Its ultimate goal is to help students strengthen access to the text itself as a basis for predicting and their ability to learn from complex text independently, and interpreting. thus to enhance college and career readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Reading.Pdf
    Ed Camp 2015 Hope Scherlin “A significant body of research links the close reading of complex text- whether the student is a struggling reader or advanced- to significant gains in reading proficiency and finds close reading to be a key component of college and career readiness.”(Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, 2011, p7) CCSS expects students to be able to: read complex text write to the text examine meaning A thoughtful, critical analysis of text that focuses on significant details or patterns to develop a deep, precise understanding of the text. Most reading grazes the surface of a text; Close Reading digs deeper to uncover the meaning of the text. Short, complex text Limited pre-reading activities- Allows students to discover the meaning on their own Deliberately read and REREAD Discuss with others Respond to text-dependent questions Questions rooted in the text- no personal or text to self connections Consider Text Complexity Text and sentence structure, vocabulary, knowledge demands of the reader Readability Level Reader and Task Measures Prior knowledge, topic, interests, reading skills, etc. You know your students! Text Dependent Questions- cannot be answered with out using the text encourage a deep consideration of the text Requires students to be thoughtful readers Teaches students to think as they read- What is the author telling me here? Are there any hard or important words? What does the author want me to understand? How does the author play with language to add meaning? There is no specific sequence to Close Reading. This is a guide to help you scaffold the lesson focusing on increasing complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Close Look at Close Reading (PDF)
    A Close Look at Close Reading Scaffolding Students with Complex Texts Beth Burke, NBCT [email protected] Table of Contents What Is Close Reading? ....................................................................................................................... 2 Selecting a Text .................................................................................................................................... 3 What Makes Text Complex? ................................................................................................................ 4 Steps in Close Reading ........................................................................................................................ 5 Scaffolding Students in Close Reading .............................................................................................. 6 Close Reading Template ...................................................................................................................... 7 Close Reading Sample Lesson ............................................................................................................ 8 Spelunking (article) .............................................................................................................................. 9 Text Dependent Questions ................................................................................................................ 10 [email protected] 1 What Is Close Reading? Close reading is thoughtful, critical analysis of a text that focuses on significant details or patterns
    [Show full text]
  • And Others Annotated Index to the English Journal, First
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 067 664 95 CS 200 140 AUTHOR Harvey, Robert C., Ed.; And Others TITLE Annotated Index to the English Journal, First Supplement: 1964-1970. INSTITUTION- National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DUEW), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Sep 72 NOTE 115p. AVAILABLE FROMNational Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Road, Urbana, III. 61801 (Stock No..47826, $3.25 non-member, $2.95 member) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Annotated Bibliographies; Composition (Literary) ; English Curriculum; *English Instruction; *Indexes (Locaters); Language; *Literature; Reading; *Resource Materials; Teaching Methods ABSTRACT In this index, which can be used as a guide to professional reading as well as a research tool, 1100 articles that originally appeared in the "English Journal" from 1964 to 1970 are annotated and indexed. Only those items that could be considered "articles" were included, excluding such items as letters to the editors, book reviews, etc. The table of contents is the main avenue of access, dividing the annotations into sections and categories. When an article has more than one major emphasis, it is cross-referenced. The annotations are intended to amplify the titles and briefly describe the content and emphasis of the articles. There are two indexes included: the "Literary Works and Their Authors," which provides quick access to articles discussing particular works or authors, and an "Author Index," which is an alphabetical list of the authors of the articles annotated. (JF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE 7. f EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT VAS BEEN REPRO.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Reading in the Early Grades
    Close Reading in the Early Grades Participant Workbook Core Knowledge Foundation 801 East High Street Charlottesville, VA 22902 434.977.7550 © 2015 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 Creative Commons Licensing You are free: •to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work •to Remix — to adapt the work • Under the following conditions: •Attribution — You must attribute the work in the following manner: • This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. •Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. •Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. • With the understanding that: •For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ © 2015 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Close Read Planning Process Adapted for elementary educators from http://www.achievethecore.org/ela-literacy-common-core/text- dependent-questions/ Step 1: Identify Key Ideas Read the entire text to identify and record the key understanding and ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Placing Text at the Center of the Standards-Aligned ELA Classroom
    Placing Text at the Center of the Standards-Aligned ELA Classroom Meredith Liben Susan Pimentel 1 Introduction Reading instruction in America is broken. Only slightly more than a third of our students are reading at proficient levels as measured by the NAEP, and scores have been stubbornly flat for over two decades1. What is the reason for the utter lack of progress in reading scores despite new, challenging standards and the fact that teachers are working harder than ever? While there is current research that points at effective instruction to develop literacy, many teachers have not been made aware of it and, therefore, do not know how to focus on the right approaches. Only rarely have teachers been provided with a chance to develop a solid understanding of the key ingredients of reading comprehension, all of which require placing text at the center of the standards-aligned classroom. These include: • Securing solid foundational reading skills (so students are fluent readers at every grade level); • Building students’ vocabulary (both to be acquired through context and in word study); • Growing students’ general knowledge of the world from reading (so they have a trove of knowledge to reference when they read); and • Parsing complex text by helping all students develop a standard of coherence (the expectation that what they read should make sense) through regular, close reading of rich text. Many educators have embraced placing texts at the center of instruction while working to raise expectations for their students, but others have continued to engage comprehension strategies and skills as a list to teach and check off in isolation, which has cost children dearly.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Reading in Elementary Classrooms by Dr
    Close Reading in Elementary Classrooms By Dr. Douglas Fisher Teacher Leader, San Diego, CA Professor of Educational Leadership, San Diego State University President, International Literacy Association Overview In recent years, many literacy educators have focused their attention on the practice of close reading. Close reading is the instructional practice of having students critically examine a text, especially through multiple readings. It has been utilized most commonly at the secondary and college levels, usually within the context of rhetorical reading and writing courses. Adler and Van Doren (1940/1972) explain in their seminal text, How to Read a Book, that readers should “x-ray the book” in order to find “the skeleton hidden between its covers” (p. 75). The intent in analytic reading is to identify these deep structures in order to plumb the explicit and implicit meanings of the text. Paul and Elder (2003) explain that this practice encourages students to: ■ Identify their purpose for reading ■ Determine the author’s purpose for writing the piece ■ Develop schema ■ Understand systems of thought in the disciplines The overarching goal of close reading is to cause students to engage in critical thinking with a text. Notice how all of the above elements coincide with well- researched elements of effective reading instruction. What is lacking, however, is specific research on the effectiveness of close reading for elementary students. It is fair to say that our collective understanding of this practice will grow as empirical studies are conducted with this population. Until that occurs, it is useful to examine these elements within the context of what we currently know about reading instruction for young students.
    [Show full text]