Effective Dispute Resolution – a Panacea for the Transformation of the Nigerian Capital Market

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effective Dispute Resolution – a Panacea for the Transformation of the Nigerian Capital Market THE 2016 JUDGES WORKSHOP – EFFECTIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION – A PANACEA FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE NIGERIAN CAPITAL MARKET The 2016 Edition of the SEC Judges workshop was held on the 24th -25th of February, 2016 at the National Judicial Institute, Abuja. The event was declared open by the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Hon. Justice Mahmud Mohammed, GCON, FNJI ably represented by His Lordship, Hon. Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad, JSC, CON, FNJI. The workshop with the theme “Effective Dispute Resolution – A Panacea for the Transformation of the Nigerian Capital Market”, had in attendance several distinguished personalities from the Legal profession, the capital market, the legislature and top Government functionaries. Notable amongst the attendees was the former Chief justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Dahiru Musdapher GCON, Professor Dalvinder Singh Sangha (a Professor of Law from the University of Warwick, United Kingdom), Senator Isiaka Adeleke (Chairman, Senate Committee on Capital Market), Hon. Tajudeen Ayo Yusuf (Chairman, House Committee on Capital Market), Justices of the Court of Appeal, Chief Judges of States and Honourable Judges of the Federal High Court. Delivering the special paper titled Contextual approach to Enforcement Strategy and Sanctions, Prof. Dalvinder Singh Sangha posited that a Regulatory-Enforcement Strategy needs to be built around a relationship between the regulator and regulated where enforcement through legal channels of rules is not necessarily its first response. He advocated for the application of both a compliance and a deterrence based approach to enforcement, stressing that there was need for the existence of both approaches to deal with the variety of enforcement issues a regulator will confront during its day to day oversight of the financial system. Other papers delivered at the workshop include; 1. Current Reforms in the Nigerian Capital Market and the Role of the SEC presented by Ms. Daisy Ekineh (former Executive Commissioner Operations and Acting Director General SEC) 1 | P a g e 2. Dispute Resolution in the Capital market: A Review of Administrative and Judicial Mechanisms presented by Chief Anthony Idigbe, S.A.N (Punuka Attorneys). 3. The Nigerian Securities Market and Regulation: Industry Challenges and Expectations from the Judiciary presented by Professor Konyinsola Ajayi, S.A.N (Olaniwun Ajayi LP.). 4. Investor Protection and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the Nigerian Capital Market presented by Dr. Ngozi Chianakwalam, (Chairperson of the Investment & Securities Tribunal). 5. Pertinent Issues in the Adjudication of Disputes arising from the Capital Market presented by Justice Abdu Kafarati of the Federal High Court, Abuja. Prof. Koyinsola Ajayi S.A.N, in his paper, delivered by Mr. Muyiwa Balogun of Olaniwun Ajayi LP, explained the important role of the capital market to the development of an economy. The learned SAN posited that an efficient and effective capital market is the foundation of any meaningful and sustainable economic growth. He added that the efficiency and effectiveness of the capital market however depends on the robustness of its legal and regulatory framework. He stated that the provisions of the Investment and Securities Act 2007 (ISA) and the Rules and Regulations of the SEC as well as the other capital market related rules prevalent in Nigeria cannot in themselves achieve investor protection. The courts have a critical role to play in applying the relevant laws and rules in order to foster effective regulation of the capital market, achieve investor protection and legal certainty. This would enable investors and capital market operators understand the laws and rules applicable to them, predicate the consequences of their actions and properly order their affairs. He further opined that the ongoing jurisdictional controversy between the Federal High Court and the IST, in his opinion would have a negative impact on the capital market and the nation’s economic growth. Chief Anthony Idigbe, S.A.N in delivering his paper, advocated for deference to the decisions of both the Administrative Proceedings Committee (APC) of the Commission and the Investment and Securities Tribunal (IST) by the Nigerian Courts. The learned 2 | P a g e S.A.N urged the courts to act in this regard giving consideration to the level of expertise and special knowledge applied by the assessors of both bodies in adjudicating over capital market disputes. He submitted that challenges to decisions of these bodies should be subjected to judicial reviews, rather than a jurisdictional conflict as it exists today. He opined that there was need for the courts to adhere strictly to the principles applicable for the administration of judicial reviews, which would reduce the rate at which the decisions of these bodies would be overturned by the courts. Dr. Ngozi Chianakwalam, Chairperson of the Investment & Securities Tribunal (IST) outlined the importance of the IST and also elucidated on some of the judgments delivered by the tribunal and their impact on investors’ confidence. Justice Abdul Kafarati of the Federal High Court, shared his thoughts on the controversies surrounding the jurisdiction of the IST vis a vis the powers of the Federal High Court as provided in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria Participants at the workshop agreed that the jurisdictional controversy around adjudication on capital market related matters between the IST and the Federal High Court was a constitutional one that could permanently be cured by a constitutional amendment. In this regard, Senator Isiaka Adeleke, in his goodwill message had assured the forum that the National Assembly was willing to assist the Commission in advocating for legislative amendments to laws which would enhance the development of the capital market. Having deliberated exhaustively on the issues raised, participants adopted the under listed as the communique for the workshop: 1. In the quest to develop a vibrant capital market, the central role of the Judiciary in the maintenance of market integrity cannot be overlooked. Without fair, prompt and effective dispensation of justice, the Nigerian capital market cannot achieve its aspiration of becoming a world class capital market that catalyzes Nigeria’s emergence as a major global economy. 3 | P a g e 2. The Workshop should be an annual calendar event to strengthen collaborations between the capital market and the Judiciary. 3. The current market wide reforms by the SEC, which is part of the full implementation of the 10 year Master plan (2015-2025), such as the E-dividend initiative, Full Dematerialization, Direct Cash Settlement and the Complaints Management Framework are ground breaking initiatives that would revolutionize the Nigerian capital market. However, a robust framework for National capacity building, Continuing Education and Enlightenment in the market is central to consolidating the gains of these reforms. 4. Issues surrounding the Judicial review of decisions of SEC’s Administrative Proceedings Committee (APC) by the Investments and Securities Tribunal and the Federal High Court need to be decisively addressed to preserve and enhance the integrity of the dispute resolution mechanism in the capital market. 5. A comprehensive reform agenda for the Investments and Securities Tribunal (IST) needs to be urgently instituted. This would address issues pertaining to the Jurisdiction, funding and constitution of members of the Tribunal. In the interim, the IST should be supported by all stakeholders to continue performing its responsibilities under the ISA 2007. 6. The SEC should promote Securities Arbitration and other Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms to facilitate expeditious dispensation of Justice in the capital market. 7. Judicial pronouncements and decisions on capital market issues should be progressive, taking into consideration the overriding wellbeing of the market and the protection of investors. Injunctive reliefs that inhibit the statutory powers of the Regulator to sanction erring capital market operators should only be granted 4 | P a g e after a careful analysis of the impact such orders have on market integrity and investor confidence. 8. The adoption of the doctrine of judicial deference in capital market matters should be encouraged. This connotes the acknowledgment by the Courts (in their adjudication of capital market disputes) of the specialized (technical) knowledge and expertise of the SEC and other market Regulators. 9. The entire gamut of Regulation in the capital market is the protection of investors and the hallmark of investor protection is dispute resolution. However, the investor protection and dispute resolution mechanism in the market must be supported by an equally robust enforcement framework. 10. The controversies and conflicting Judicial decisions with respect to the jurisdiction of the IST vis a vis the Federal High Court on capital market matters need to be conclusively tackled via a Constitutional amendment. The capital market should present a position in this regard to the National Assembly, which may be accomplished either by streamlining constitutional the powers of the Federal High Court in respect of capital market matters or bringing the IST under the appellate purview of a specialized division of the Federal High Court. 5 | P a g e .
Recommended publications
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of NIGERIA on Wednesday, the 31St Day of December 1969
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA On Wednesday, the 31st Day of December 1969 Before their Lordship Sylvester Umaru Onu ..... Justice Supreme Court Akintola Olufemi Ejiwunmi ..... Justice Supreme Court Dahiru Musdapher ..... Justice Supreme Court Mahmud Mohammed ..... Justice Supreme Court Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen ..... Justice Supreme Court SC208/2000 Between Chief Ugbor Ofia & 3 ors .... Appellant And Chief Isaiah Mba Ejem & 4 ors .... Respondent Judgment of the Court Delivered by Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen. J.S.C. This is an appeal against the judgment of the Port Harcourt Division of the Court of Appeal delivered in appeal No CA/PH/156/94 on the 27th day of January 2000 in which it allowed the appeal of the present Respondents against the judgment of the High Court of Imo State holden at Afikpo in suit No HAF/3/77 delivered by Anyanwu, J. on the 30th day of July 1991 in favour of the Appellants who were Plaintiffs before that Court was set aside. On the 3rd day of February, 1977 the Appellants as Plaintiffs caused a Writ of Summons to be issued against the Respondents who were Defendants claiming the following reliefs: 1. The Plaintiffs claim against the Defendants jointly and severally as follows: - (a) Declaration of title to the piece and portion of land called Nchara Edda situate in Edda within jurisdiction. The annual value is less than ten Naira (N10. 00). (b) N50, 000.00 (Fifty thousand Naira) being general damages for trespass in that the Defendants without the consent and or permission sometime in 1973 broke and entered the Plaintiffs said Nchara Edda and made roads, made foundation for houses, made nursery for palm trees and cut many economic trees including palm trees and timber.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigerian Banking Law Reports [1997]
    NIGERIAN BANKING LAW REPORTS [1997] VOLUME 7 (PART II) To be cited as: [1997] 7 N.B.L.R. (PART II) Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation 2009 Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Plot 447/448 Airport Road Central Business District P.M.B. 284, Garki Abuja, Federal Capital Territory [FCT] Nigeria Tel: +23495237715-6, +523696740-44 Members of the LexisNexis Group worldwide South Africa LexisNexis DURBAN 215 North Ridge Road, Morningside, 4001 JOHANNESBURG First Floor, 25 Fredman Drive, Sandton, 2196 CAPE TOWN Ground Floor, Waterford House, 2 Ring Road, Century City, 7441 www.lexisnexis.co.za Australia LexisNexis, CHATSWOOD, New South Wales Austria LexisNexis Verlag ARD Orac GmbH & Co KG, VIENNA Benelux LexisNexis Benelux, AMSTERDAM China LexisNexis, BEIJING Canada LexisNexis Butterworths, MARKHAM, Ontario France LexisNexis SA, PARIS Germany LexisNexis Germany, MÜNSTER Hong Kong LexisNexis, HONG KONG Hungary HVG-Orac, BUDAPEST India LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur, NEW DELHI Ireland Butterworths (Ireland) Ltd, DUBLIN Italy Giuffrè Editore, MILAN Japan LexisNexis, TOKYO Korea LexisNexis, SEOUL Malaysia LexisNexis, KUALA LUMPUR New Zealand LexisNexis, WELLINGTON Poland LexisNexis Poland, WARSAW Singapore LexisNexis, SINGAPORE United Kingdom LexisNexis Butterworths, LONDON USA LexisNexis, DAYTON, Ohio © 2009 Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation, published by LexisNexis (Pty) Ltd under licence ISSN 1595-1030 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying and recording, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation at the Nigerian Bar Association Annual General Conference, Abuja 2015 on Current Developments in Judicial Reforms in Nigeria
    PRESENTATION AT THE NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION ANNUAL GENERAL CONFERENCE, ABUJA 2015 ON CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN JUDICIAL REFORMS IN NIGERIA Introduction The words of the then Speaker of the Nigerian House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Aminu Waziri Tambuwal at the public hearing of the bill for the enactment of the administration of Criminal Justice Bill vividly captures the need for continuous judicial reform of any nation. According to him “….human society is dynamic; the system of administration of justice cannot be static but must be improved to create more effective and efficient mechanisms, procedures and institutions for dealing with the new realities and challenges in the society. This is because it is impossible to have a sound economy without a solid foundation of good laws that can curb anti-social behaviours and other disruptive tendencies. As we develop plans and strategies for the economic and other forms of reforms, we also need to develop plans and programmes for creating sound laws and procedural systems consistent with our commitment to our legislative agenda.” One cannot but agree with the above submission as a sound economy is the surest engine of growth and the shortest route to tackling the challenges that confronts any given society. No nation, therefore, can boast to have achieved the best of reform in its judicial system at any given time without putting measures in place that allow for the continuous reform of its justice sector in line with the changes inherent in human society which also translates to changes in the economy. The role of law in promoting economic development cannot be underscored because most of human lives and interaction with each other are regulated by law.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORIGIN of the NAME NIGERIA Nigeria As Country
    THE ORIGIN OF THE NAME NIGERIA Help our youth the truth to know Nigeria as country is located in West In love and Honesty to grow Africa between latitude 40 – 140 North of the And living just and true equator and longitude 30 – 140 East of the Greenwich meridian. Great lofty heights attain The name Nigeria was given by the Miss To build a nation where peace Flora Shaw in 1898 who later married Fredrick Lord Lugard who amalgamated the Northern And justice shall reign and Southern Protectorates of Nigeria in the NYSC ANTHEM year 1914 and died in 1945. Youth obey the Clarion call The official language is English and the Nation’s motto is UNITY AND FAITH, PEACE AND Let us lift our Nation high PROGRESS. Under the sun or in the rain NATIONAL ANTHEM With dedication, and selflessness Arise, O Compatriots, Nigeria’s call obey Nigeria is ours, Nigeria we serve. To serve our fatherland NIGERIA COAT OF ARMS With love and strength and faith Representation of Components The labour of our hero’s past - The Black Shield represents the good Shall never be in vain soil of Nigeria - The Eagle represents the Strength of To serve with heart and Might Nigeria One nation bound in freedom, - The Two Horses stands for dignity and pride Peace and unity. - The Y represent River Niger and River Benue. THE PLEDGE THE NIGERIAN FLAG I Pledge to Nigeria my Country The Nigeria flag has two colours To be faithful loyal and honest (Green and White) To serve Nigeria with all my strength - The Green part represents Agriculture To defend her unity - The White represents Unity and Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Thenigerialawyer(C) Copyright
    TheNigerialawyer(c) Copyright MEMBERS OF THE BODY OF BENCHERS (A) CHAIRMAN Mr. O. C. J. Okocha, MFR, SAN Life Bencher (B) VICE CHIARMAN Hon. Justice Olabode Rhodes-Vivour, CFR Life Bencher (C) FORMER CHAIRMEN OF THE BODY OF BENCHERS 1. Hon. Justice Adetokumbo Ademola, GCFR (Deceased) 1971-1972 2. Hon. Justice Taslim Ellias, GCON (Deceased) 1972-1973 3. Sir Darnley Alexender, KBE (Deceased) 1973-1974 4. Hon. Justice Augustine Nnamani (Deceased) 1974-1975 5. Hon. Justice Mohammed Bello, GCON (Deceased) 1975-1976 6. Hon. Justice G.S. Sowemimo, GCON (Deceased) 1976-1977 7. Chief Toye Coker, SAN (Deceased) 1977-1978 8. Chief Dr. G. C. M. Onyuike, SAN (Deceased) 1978-1979 9. Chief T.O. S. Benson, CFR, SAN (Deceased) 1979-1980 10. Hon. Justice Fatayi-Williams, GCON (Deceased) 1980-1981 11. Chief R.O.A. Akinjide, CON, SAN (Deceased) 1981-1982 12. Hon. Justice A.G. Irikefe, GCON (Deceased) 1982-1983 13. Alh. A. G. F. Abdul-Razaq, OFR, SAN (Deceased) 1983-1984 14. Hon. Justice Kayode Eso, CON (Deceased) 1984-1985 15. Chief F.R.A. Williams, CFR, SAN (Deceased) 1985-1986 16. Hon. Justice Mamman Nasir, GCON (Deceased) 1986-1987 17. Hon. Justice A.O. Obaseki, CON (Deceased) 1987-1988 18. Webber George Egbe, QC, SAN (Deceased) 1988-1989 19. Hon. Judge Prince Bola CFR, SAN 1989-1990 20. Chief Bankole Oki, SAN (Deceased) 1992-1993 1 TheNigerialawyer(c) Copyright 21. Hon. Justice M.L. Uwais, GCON 1993-1994 22. Mr. Kehinde Sofola, CON, SAN (Deceased) 1994-1995 23. Hon. Justice M.M.A Akanbi, CON (Deceased) 1995-1996 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in Nigerian Courts: Fashioning the Way out Through Legal and Institutional Mechanisms
    Journal of Law and Global Policy Vol. 3 No. 1 2017 www.iiardpub.org Corruption in Nigerian Courts: Fashioning the Way Out Through Legal and Institutional Mechanisms I. O. Babatunde (Ph.D) & Dr. A.O. Filani [email protected] Abstract The judiciary, which is the third arm of government is perceived by the generality of the people as the last hope of the masses. It is expected to dispense justice without fear, favour or in defiance to whose ox is gored. However, where this last hope is infested with corruption, the last hope of the common man is dashed. This paper appraised the Nigerian judiciary vis –a-vis the attendant corruption of some of its members. The judiciary has a large role to play in the successful administration of justice in a given polity. To achieve this, it must be fearless, just and fair in the determination of cases before it. The paper found that some members of the Nigerian judiciary fell short of this confidence reposed in them by being corrupt and this has whittled down effective administration of justice in Nigeria. The paper concluded that a corrupt free judiciary is an antidote to a fair and just society. Key Words: Judiciary, Corruption, Justice, Nigeria. Courts, Law Introduction Corrupt practices among the people or groups predate the arrival of the colonial masters in Nigeria and the incidence of corrupt practices remained unchecked during the colonial administration.1The level of increase in corrupt practices in Nigeria was one of the major factors responsible for the collapse of the first republic.2 Corruption is an issue of concern to well- meaning Nigerians.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Justices of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal
    LIST OF JUSTICES JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE DAHIRU MUSDAPHER CHIEF JUSTICE OF NIGERIA THE HON. JUSTICE ALOMA MARIAM MUKHTAR JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE MAHMUD MOHAMMED JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON JUSTICE FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE IBRAHIM TANKO MUHAMMAD JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL CHUKWUMA – ENEH JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT HON. JUSTICE M.S. MUNTAKA – COOMASSIE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE JOHN AFOLABI FABIYI JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE OLUFUNLOLA OYELOLA ADEKEYE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE SULEIMAN GALADIMA JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE BODE RHODES – VIVOUR JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE NWALI SYLVESTER NGWUTA JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON. JUSTICE MARY UKAEGO PETER- ODILI JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT THE HON JUSTICE OLUKAYODE ARIWOOLA JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT LIST OF JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL HON. JUSTICE DALHATU ADAMU ACTING PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL LAGOS DIVISION HON. JUSTICE KUMAI BAYANG AKAAHS JUSTICE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL HON. JUSTICE HELEN MORONIKEJI OGUNWUMIJU JUSTICE OF COURT OF APPEAL HON. JUSTICE IBRAHIM MOHD MUSA SAULAWA JUSTICE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL HON. JUSTICE JOHN INYANG OKORO JUSTICE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL HON. JUSTICE SIDI DAUDA BAGE JUSTICE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL HON. JUSTICE NOSAKHARE PEMU JUSTICE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL HON. JUSTICE MOHAMMED AMBI-USI DANJUMA JUSTICE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL KADUNA DIVISION HON.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigerian Banking Law Reports
    NIGERIAN BANKING LAW REPORTS [2001 – 2003] VOLUME 12 To be cited as: [2001 – 2003] 12 N.B.L.R. Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Plot 447/448 Airport Road Central Business District P.M.B. 284, Garki Abuja, Federal Capital Territory [FCT] Nigeria Tel: +23495237715-6, +523696740-44 Members of the LexisNexis Group worldwide South Africa LexisNexis (Pty) Ltd DURBAN 215 Peter Mokaba Road (North Ridge Road), Morningside, Durban, 4001 JOHANNESBURG Building No. 9, Harrowdene Office Park, 124 Western Service Road, Woodmead, 2191 CAPE TOWN Office Floor 2, North Lobby, Boulevard Place, Heron Close, Century City, 7441 www.lexisnexis.co.za Australia LexisNexis, CHATSWOOD, New South Wales Austria LexisNexis Verlag ARD Orac, VIENNA Benelux LexisNexis Benelux, AMSTERDAM Canada LexisNexis Canada, MARKHAM, Ontario China LexisNexis, BEIJING France LexisNexis, PARIS Germany LexisNexis Germany, MÜNSTER Hong Kong LexisNexis, HONG KONG India LexisNexis, NEW DELHI Italy Giuffrè Editore, MILAN Japan LexisNexis, TOKYO Korea LexisNexis, SEOUL Malaysia LexisNexis, KUALA LUMPUR New Zealand LexisNexis, WELLINGTON Poland LexisNexis Poland, WARSAW Singapore LexisNexis, SINGAPORE United Kingdom LexisNexis, LONDON USA LexisNexis, DAYTON, Ohio © 2013 Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation, published by LexisNexis (Pty) Ltd under licence ISSN 1595-1030 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying and recording, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information published in this work is accurate, the editors, publishers and printers take no responsibility for any loss or damage suffered by any person as a result of the reliance upon the information contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigerian Banking Law Reports
    NIGERIAN BANKING LAW REPORTS [2002 – 2004] VOLUME 11 (PART II) To be cited as: [2002 – 2004] 11 N.B.L.R. (PART II) Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Plot 447/448 Airport Road Central Business District P.M.B. 284, Garki Abuja, Federal Capital Territory [FCT] Nigeria Tel: +23495237715-6, +523696740-44 Members of the LexisNexis Group worldwide South Africa LexisNexis Durban 215 Peter Mokaba Road (North Ridge Road), Morningside, 4001 Johannesburg First Floor, 25 Fredman Drive, Sandton, 2196 Cape Town Office Floor 2, North Lobby, Boulevard Place, Heron Close, Century City, 7114 www.lexisnexis.co.za Australia LexisNexis, CHATSWOOD, New South Wales Austria LexisNexis Verlag ARD Orac GmbH & Co KG, VIENNA Benelux LexisNexis Benelux, AMSTERDAM China LexisNexis, BEIJING Canada LexisNexis Butterworths, MARKHAM, Ontario France LexisNexis SA, PARIS Germany LexisNexis Germany, MÜNSTER Hong Kong LexisNexis, HONG KONG Hungary HVG-Orac, BUDAPEST India LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur, NEW DELHI Ireland Butterworths (Ireland) Ltd, DUBLIN Italy Giuffrè Editore, MILAN Japan LexisNexis, TOKYO Korea LexisNexis, SEOUL Malaysia LexisNexis, KUALA LUMPUR New Zealand LexisNexis, WELLINGTON Poland LexisNexis Poland, WARSAW Singapore LexisNexis, SINGAPORE United Kingdom LexisNexis Butterworths, LONDON USA LexisNexis, DAYTON, Ohio © 2009 Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation, published by LexisNexis (Pty) Ltd under licence ISSN 1595-1030 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying and recording, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Independence Under Nigeria's Fourth Republic 5
    Aka: Judicial Independence under Nigeria’s Fourth Republic: Problems +(,1 2 1/,1( Citation: 45 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 1 2014 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Wed Jun 10 14:20:02 2015 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0886-3210 Published by CWSL Scholarly Commons, 2014 1 California Western International Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1 [2014], Art. 2 CALIFORNIA WESTERN INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 45 FALL 2014 NUMBER 1 JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE UNDER NIGERIA'S FOURTH REPUBLIC: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS PHILIP C. AKA* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF STUDY.........................3 I. DEFINING JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE ............................ 9 A. Key Indicatorsof JudicialIndependence........................ 10 * Professor of Political Science, Chicago State University; Adjunct Professor of Law and S.J.D. Candidate, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law-Indianapolis; Member of the Illinois Bar; former Vice Chair, ABA Committee on International Human Rights. B.A. (magna cum laude), Edinboro University of Pennsylvania; M.A., University of North Texas; J.D., Temple University School of Law; LL.M. (summa cum laude), Indiana University School of Law at Indianapolis; Ph.D., Howard University. This article originated as a paper presented at the Twenty-Third Annual Africa/Diaspora Conference of the Center for African Peace and Conflict Resolution (CAPCR), held April 24-26, 2014, at California State University, Sacramento, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Globalisation of Plea Bargaining and its Emergence in Nigeria: A Critical Analysis of Practice, Problems, and Priorities in Criminal Justice Reform. Submitted in fulfillment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Candidate: Abubakar Bukar Kagu School of Law, University of Sussex. 2016 1 Acknowledgement First, I give gratitude to Allah for seeing me through this onerous but worthy process of learning and development. My appreciation also goes to my Supervisors Prof. Richard K. Vogler and Dr. Mark Walters whose support, guidance and humility cannot be quantified. I also give thanks to my family and friends. I wish I could mention their names individually but for the little space to do so. Yet, I must mention my Dad. Alhaji Abubakar Kagu Dapchi, My mum Hajja Innah Mai Bukar Machinama, My siblings Kolo, Fati, Hauwa, Yakura, Umar, Ummiyo and Bintu as great part of this success. To HRH Bashir Bukar Albishir and all the members of my family, I want to say you are more than just amazing.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (2189Kb)
    A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/87345 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Towards a Suitable Domestic Arbitration Practice in Nigeria By Ademola Jonathan Bamgbose A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law University of Warwick School of Law June 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication ..................................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... viii Declaration .................................................................................................................................... iix Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... x List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... xi Table of Legislation .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]