DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Consultation on Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in the Carpathians

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Consultation on Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in the Carpathians Policy Consultation on Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development In the Carpathians Policy Assessments for Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in Mountain Regions (SARD-M) National Reports in Romania, Slovakia and Ukraine Prepared by national consultants: Emilian Burdusel - Romania Radoslava Kanianska - Slovakia Oksana Maryskevych - Ukraine UNEP-Vienna ISCC June 2006 CONTACT INFORMATION Regional Focal Point Contact: Harald Egerer Address: UNEP – Interim Secretariat of the Carpathian Convention JOE 25 - Vienna International Centre PO Box 500 1400 Vienna, Austria Phone: (+43) 1 26060-4545 Fax: (+43) 1 26060-6730 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.carpathianconvention.org SARD-M Team Contact: Dominique Legros Address: Sustainable Development Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italy Phone: (+39) 06 570-54204 Fax: (+39) 06 570-53250 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.fao.org/sard/sard-m The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors alone and do not imply any opinion whatsoever in the part of FAO (UN) Policy Consultation on Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in the Carpathians. Final Report/UNEP-ISCC (2006) 2 Table of Contents Executive summary 4 List of figures 6 List of tables 7 Abbreviations and Acronyms 8 Introduction 10 1. Land-use in the Carpathians 12 2. Evolution of the employment structure 17 3. Agricultural production and forestry 22 4. Economic performance of agricultural producers since 1990 37 5. Biodiversity of farmland and forestland 41 6. Survey of rural development 50 7. Existing policies and strategies affecting directly or indirectly SARD in the 56 mountain areas 8. Institutions responsible for designing and implementing the policies for SARD 76 in the mountain areas 9. Challenges and opportunities for SARD in Romanian, Slovakian and Ukrainian 86 parts of the Carpathians Annexes Annex 1 Article 7 on sustainable agriculture and forestry of the framework Convention 89 for the protection and sustainable development of the Carpathian Mountains Annex 2 Administrative units in the Ukrainian part of the Carpathians (Figure 1) 90 Annex 3 Economic efficiency value and production expenditures of farms in the sample 91 mountain districts of Lviv region in the Ukrainian Carpathians References 92 Policy Consultation on Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in the Carpathians. Final Report/UNEP-ISCC (2006) 3 Executive summary This report is a result and product of the “Policy Consultation on Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in the Carpathians” in support of the assessments of strengths and weaknesses of the mountain policies in the Carpathians implemented in 2005 in the framework of the FAO Project for Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in Mountain Regions (SARD-M) which aims to strengthen mountain populations’ livelihoods with improved policies for sustainable agriculture and rural development. Activities under the project in the Carpathians have involved many different partners (i.e. governmental bodies, civil society and international organizations) and their results have been discussed at a regional expert’s workshop. During the months of June to August 2005, three national consultants Emilian Burdusel from Romania, Radoslava Kanianska from Slovakia, Oksana Maryskevych from Ukraine, carried out three country surveys in Romania, an EU accession country, Slovakia, a new EU Member State, and Ukraine, an EU neighbouring country. Through the analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of SARD-M related policies, institutions and processes, the objective was to identify priority areas for sub-regional and regional policies and options that need to be addressed from an economic, environmental and social perspective. Based on the findings obtained from the three policy assessments conducted at the national level, recommendations and proposals for follow-up activities were drawn up for the Carpathian level. The three draft assessments were discussed during an expert workshop on Strengthening SARD-M policies for the protection and sustainable development of the Carpathians, organized by the United Nations Environment Programme Vienna – Interim Secretariat of the Carpathian Convention (UNEP Vienna – ISCC), together with the FAO SARD-M Project and EUROMONTANA in conjunction with the Conference on “Integrated Rural Development in the Mountain Areas of Central and Eastern Europe and the Balkans”, held on 24 October 2005 in Liptovský Mikuláš, Slovak Republic. This workshop drew high-level participation from the Minister of Agriculture of the Slovak Republic and Ministries from other Central and Eastern European countries, experts from different branches and from civil society along with representatives from international organizations. The participants revised the assessment results and enriched the outcomes of the consultation through valuable comments and by elaborating 22 recommendations and proposals for follow-up activities which are published in a separate document. 1 It is important to underline that despite the importance of SARD-Mas a policy domain in the Carpathians, such a comprehensive study in the context of the SARD-Mapproach for the Carpathian region has not been undertaken before in any of the seven countries. In order to conduct these rapid assessments, national consultants individually gathered general information on specific aspects of agriculture and rural development in the mountain regions and attempted to evaluate the effects of EU accession and influence of the Carpathian Convention on national agri-environmental policies. The assessments present an extensive survey of the overall and local situations of sustainable agriculture and rural development in the Carpathian mountains of the three countries. They specifically focus on crucial aspects that need to be taken into consideration to provide elements for a diagnostic of policies, institutions and processes for SARD-M in the Carpathian region, namely: (1) land-use, (2) employment in agriculture, (3) agricultural production and forestry, (4) economic performance of agricultural producers, (5) biodiversity value of farmland and forestland, (6) economic, 1 See Brief Summary (http://www.fao.org/sard/sard-m) which also includes a regional policy SWOT assessment based on the three countries surveys prepared by Jan Seffer, Lead Consultant. Policy Consultation on Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development in the Carpathians. Final Report/UNEP-ISCC (2006) 4 social and cultural aspects of rural development, (7) policies and strategies affecting SARD-M, (8) institutions in charge for designing and implementing the policies for SARD. As an entry point for the analysis, Article 7 2 of the Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Carpathians was selected. The Carpathian Convention, a multilateral platform for cooperation between all the stakeholders at the regional level, attempts to achieve a good balance between the three pillars (i.e., economic, environmental and social) of sustainable development. It is hoped that the results of the assessments can be transferred into action on the ground in the Carpathian countries and lead to the development of policies that are acceptable and able to be implemented by stakeholders in a position to actively influence the process. The implemented activities are expected to potentially lead to the development of the future Protocol on the Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development and Sustainable Forest/Forest Management to the Carpathian Convention on the basis of the conducted analyses under the “demand-driven” SARD-Mproject. Undertaking such a comprehensive study is obviously a difficult exercise. As the assessments were to be conducted within a short period of time, they were meant to be an exercise of reflection that provides main elements for a diagnostic of the current strengths and weaknesses of the SARD-Mpolicies. Given that SARD is a process that involves multiple sectors strongly linking agriculture and rural development and stakeholders at all governance levels, the assessments were heavily driven on the collections of the opinions of the different components of society at different levels, i.e. national and decentralized levels of government, civil society, including the private sector, and also take into consideration the multi-sectoral nature of SARD. Approaches and techniques employed within the analysis depended to some degree on the availability of reliable statistics and time-series data. This however was not always available for mountain regions, which hampered efforts to achieve accurate project results. Nevertheless, even where discrepancies and challenges exist with respect to data availability, the assessments should be viewed as an opportunity to identify data gaps and encourage the collection of relevant information for future endeavours. The development of policies for sustainable development is an iterative process that allows for national and local levels to act in a coordinated and participatory manner to develop coherent policies that balance the economic, social and environmental objectives of sustainable development. It is therefore important to see if processes/mechanisms are in place to allow for a country, within and outside the government, to learn from its experiences in order to develop the human and institutional capacities to act strategically for sustainable rural development in mountain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Second Field School in Ivano-Frankivsk
    Second Field School in Ivano-Frankivsk REPORT: The Second Field School Ivano-Frankivsk Region, Ukraine July 21-August 10, 2010 Prepared by Dr. Maria Kaspina, Dr. Boris Khaimovich & Dr. Vladimir Levin Not a single taxi driver in Ivano-Frankivsk knows where the synagogue is located, although its massive building stands only 50 meters away from the central square bustling with people at its shops and restaurants. The once vibrant Jewish community of Eastern Galicia, numbering half a million people, was not only eradicated by the Nazis and their supporters during the Holocaust, but it has also faded from the memory of local inhabitants. The aim of our field school and the entire Jewish History in Galicia and Bukovina project is to document, collect and revive remnants - physical as well as intangible - that can still be recorded, preserved and revived after 65 years of Jewish absence from the region. Towards this aim, the Second Field School arrived at Ivano-Frankivsk (formerly Stanisławów) during the summer of 2010. The Second Field School in the Ivano-Frankivsk Region took place from July 21 to August 10, 2010. It was organized by the Jewish History in Galicia and Bukovina project and the Moscow 1 Center for University Teaching of Jewish Civilization Sefer. Fifteen students under the guidance of five scholars engaged in the documentation of Jewish history. The school was composed of three teams: one documenting Jewish cemeteries, another recording oral history and ethnographical materials from the local residents and the third team surveying towns and villages in the region. The complex approach applied towards the remnants of Jewish history allows for exploration in the fullest possible way.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphologic Effects of Human Impact Across the Svydovets Massif in the Eastern Carpathians in Ukraine
    PL ISSN 0081-6434 studia geomorphologica carpatho-balcanica vol. liii – liV, 2019 – 2020 : 85 – 111 1 1 1 3 PIOTR KŁapYTA , KaZimier2 Z KrZemieŃ , elŻBIETA GORCZYca , PAWeŁ KrĄŻ , lidia dubis (KraKÓW, lViV) GEOMORPHOLOGIC EFFECTS OF HUMAN IMPACT ACROSS THE SVYDOVETS MASSIF IN THE EASTERN CARPATHIANS IN UKRAINE Abstract - : contemporary changes in the natural environment in many mountain areas, espe cially those occurring above the upper tree line, are related to tourism. the svydovets massif,- located in the eastern carpathians in ukraine, is a good example of an area that is currently experiencing intense degradation. the highest, ne part of this area is crisscrossed with nu merous paths, tourist routes, and ski trails. the strong human impact the area experiences is occurring simultaneously with the activity of natural geomorphologic processes. the processes occur with the greatest intensity above the upper tree line.th the development of the discussed- area has been occurring gradually since the early 20 century. it started when the region belonged to austria-hungary, then czechoslovakia, and subsequently the ussr. now that it be longs to independent ukraine the level of tourism-related development has sharply increased. comparing it to other mountain areas, such as the tatras, the alps, or the monts dore massif in France, the svydovets massif is being reshaped much more rapidly due to the damage caused byKeywords human impact. : human impact, tourism-related deterioration of mountains, high mountains, svydovets, eastern carpathians, ukraine INTRODUCTION - man plays a huge role in the reshaping of the geographic environment and hu man activity is especially noticeable in the mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • APPLICATION of the CHARTER in UKRAINE 2Nd Monitoring Cycle A
    Strasbourg, 15 January 2014 ECRML (2014) 3 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER IN UKRAINE 2nd monitoring cycle A. Report of the Committee of Experts on the Charter B. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the application of the Charter by Ukraine The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages provides for a control mechanism to evaluate how the Charter is applied in a State Party with a view to, where necessary, making recommendations for improving its language legislation, policy and practices. The central element of this procedure is the Committee of Experts, set up under Article 17 of the Charter. Its principal purpose is to report to the Committee of Ministers on its evaluation of compliance by a Party with its undertakings, to examine the real situation of regional or minority languages in the State and, where appropriate, to encourage the Party to gradually reach a higher level of commitment. To facilitate this task, the Committee of Ministers adopted, in accordance with Article 15, paragraph1, an outline for periodical reports that a Party is required to submit to the Secretary General. The report should be made public by the State. This outline requires the State to give an account of the concrete application of the Charter, the general policy for the languages protected under Part II and, in more precise terms, all measures that have been taken in application of the provisions chosen for each language protected under Part III of the Charter. The Committee of Experts’ first task is therefore to examine the information contained in the periodical report for all the relevant regional or minority languages on the territory of the State concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices I
    Appendices I. Archival Sources Archival research for this monograph was conducted in Lviv, the former capital of Galicia, in 1983. To orient myself in the rich archival holdings of this city, I benefitted from the unpublished manuscript of Patricia K. Grimsted's forthcoming guide to Soviet Ukrainian archives and manuscript repositories' as well as from a number of published works.' Plans to use archives in Ternopil and Ivano-Frankivsk were frustrated, as was the plan to use the manuscript collection of the Institute of Literature of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR (in Kiev). Work in the Austrian archives in 1982 did not uncover sources of direct relevance to the subject of this monograph, but the Viennese archives remain an important and little-explored repository of historical documentation on Galician history. The richest collection of unpublished sources on the history of Galicia during the Austrian period is located in the Central State Historical Archives of the Ukrainian SSR in Lviv (U Tsentrainyi derzhavnyi istorychnyi arkhiv URSR u rn. Lvovi; abbre- viated as TsDIAL). The Central Archives have inherited the papers of various Galician government institutions and major civic organizations. Unfortunately, there is no published guide to these archives, although a number of articles describe aspects of their holdings.' The papers of the Presidium of the Galician Viceroy's Office (U Haiytske narnisnytstvo, rn. Lviv. Prezydiia) are contained in TsDIAL, fond 146, opysy 4-8 (and presumably others). Particularly valuable for this study were documents dealing with the publication and confiscation of political brochures and periodicals, including , Patricia K.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Socio-Economic Issues of Polish-Ukrainian Cross-Border Cooperation
    Center of European Projects European Neighbourhood Instrument Cross-border Cooperation Programme Poland-Belarus-Ukraine 2014-2020 Publication of the Scientifi c Papers of the International Research and Practical Conference Contemporary Socio-Economic Issues of Polish-Ukrainian Cross-border Cooperation Warsaw 2017 Center of European Projects European Neighbourhood Instrument Cross-border Cooperation Programme Poland-Belarus-Ukraine 2014-2020 Publication of the Scientifi c Papers of the International Research and Practical Conference Contemporary Socio-Economic Issues of Polish-Ukrainian Cross-border Cooperation Edited by: Leszek Buller Hubert Kotarski Yuriy Pachkovskyy Warsaw 2017 Publisher: Center of European Projects Joint Technical Secretariat of the ENI Cross-border Cooperation Programme Poland-Belarus-Ukraine 2014-2020 02-672 Warszawa, Domaniewska 39 a Tel: +48 22 378 31 00 Fax: +48 22 201 97 25 e-mail: [email protected] www.pbu2020.eu The international research and practical conference Contemporary Socio-Economic Issues of Polish-Ukrainian Cross-border Cooperation was held under the patronage of Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Economic Development and Finance Mr Mateusz Morawiecki. OF ECONOMIC The conference was held in partnership with: University of Rzeszów Ivan Franko National University of Lviv This document has been produced with the fi nancial assistance of the European Union, under Cross-border Cooperation Programme Poland-Belarus-Ukraine 2007-2013. The contents of this document are the sole respon- sibility of the Joint Technical Secretariat and can under no circumstances be regarded as refl ecting the position of the European Union. Circulation: 500 copies ISBN 978-83-64597-06-0 Dear Readers, We have the pleasure to present you this publication, which is a compendium of articles received for the Scientifi c Conference “Contemporary Socio-economic Issues of Polish-Ukrainian Cross-border Cooperation”, which took place on 15-17 November 2017 in Rzeszów and Lviv.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the GIS-Based Maps of the Geomorphological and Phytogeographical Division of the Ukrainian Carpathians for Routine Use in Biogeography
    Biogeographia – The Journal of Integrative Biogeography 36 (2021): a009 https://doi.org/10.21426/B636052326 Developing the GIS-based maps of the geomorphological and phytogeographical division of the Ukrainian Carpathians for routine use in biogeography ANDRIY NOVIKOV Department of Biosystematics and Evolution of the State Natural History Museum of the NAS of Ukraine, Teatralna str. 18, 79008 Lviv (Ukraine) email: [email protected] Keywords: biogeography, mesoregional division, shapefile, Ukrainian Carpathians. SUMMARY The paper introduces GIS-based maps of the geomorphological and phytogeographical division of the Ukrainian Carpathians (a part of Eastern Carpathian Mts.), which were developed for routine use in biogeography and based on the consolidation of the existing publications. The map of the geomorphological division includes 57 OGUs (operational geographic units), and the map of the phytogeographical division – 18 OGUs of the lowest rank. Geomorphological units are supported with available synonyms, which should help in work with different topic-related Ukrainian publications. Both maps follow strict hierarchical classification and are briefly discussed. INTRODUCTION Tsys (1962, 1968) published the first The Ukrainian Carpathians (UC) is part of the complete geomorphologic division of the UC. Eastern Carpathian mountain province Besides five mountainous regions, this division (Kondracki 1989), artificially delimited by the also included adjacent foothills and lowlands western border of Ukraine and covering about (Ciscarpathia and Transcarpathia) and 24,000 km2. In general, these are not high comprised 36 districts. Such regionalization of mountains – only seven peaks of the UC the UC was further developed by many slightly exceed 2000 m of elevation, and all Ukrainian scientists (Herenchuk 1968, these peaks, including the highest point of Marynych et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel Liberman Research Director Brookline, MA Katrina A. Krzysztofiak Laura Raybin Miller Program Manager Pembroke Pines, FL Patricia Hoglund Vincent Obsitnik Administrative Officer McLean, VA 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1160 Washington, DC 20006 Ph: ( 202) 254-3824 Fax: ( 202) 254-3934 E-mail: [email protected] May 30, 2005 Message from the Chairman One of the principal missions that United States law assigns the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad is to identify and report on cemeteries, monuments, and historic buildings in Central and Eastern Europe associated with the cultural heritage of U.S. citizens, especially endangered sites. The Congress and the President were prompted to establish the Commission because of the special problem faced by Jewish sites in the region: The communities that had once cared for the properties were annihilated during the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcarpathian Art Institute
    ЕРДЕЛІВСЬКІ ЧИТАННЯ, 2013 р. MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF UKRAINE TRANSCARPATHIAN ART INSTITUTE №4 The NEWSLETTER of Transcarpathian Institute of Arts Bulletin of scientific and research works of International scientific‐practical conference Uzhhorod, the 13‐14th of May, 2013 Edition Hrazhda Uzhhorod, 2013 2 The Herald of Transcarpathian Art Institute. № 4 LBC 85.103(4UKR) UDC 7.03(477) N 34 The fourth issue of “The Herald of Transcarpathian Art Institute” contains the materials of international scientific and practical conference “Erdelyi’s Lec‐ tures”, held in Uzhhorod on the 14th ‐16th of May, 2013. The scientific analysis of theoretical and practical researches in the sphere of Fine and Decorative‐ Applied Arts, design and art education in Ukraine was given and the problem of interinfluence of the cultures of the European people and the introduction of art education in artistic establishments were touched upon. It is printed according to the decree of Scientific council of Transcarpathian Art Institute since the 25th of January, 2013, protocol №5 Editorial board: Ivan Nebesnyk, Phd of pedagogical sciences, professor, rector of TAI; Mykola Yakovlev, PhD of technical sciences (technical aesthetics), professor, main scientific secretary of NAAU; Mykola Mushynka, academician of NAAU, PhD of philological sciences, professor; Volodymyr Vasylyev, PhD of culturology, professor of Chuvask state university named after I.M. Ulyanov; Orest Holubets, PhD of art criticism, professor; Halyna Stelmashchuk, PhD of art criticism, professor; Mykhaylo Tyvodar, PhD of historical sciences, professor; Serhiy Fedaka, PhD of historical sciences, professor; Ivan Vovkanych, PhD of historical sciences, professor; Roman Yaciv, candidate of art criticism, associate professor, vice rector of LNAA; Odarka Dolhosh, candidate of art criticism; Attila Kopryva, candidate of art criticism, associate professor; Mykhaylo Pryimych, candidate of art criticism, associate professor; Nataliya Rebryk, candidate of philological sciences, vice rector of TAI.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivano-Frankivsk Region
    INVEST IN IVANO-FRANKIVSK REGION WHY IVANO-FRANKIVSK REGION 2 LOCATION 3 TRANSPORT 4 POPULATION 5 LABOUR MARKET 6 EDUCATION 6 WORK FORCE 9 R&D LANDSCAPE 12 ECONOMY 15 EXPORT 18 IMPORT 19 FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS 20 INDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITIES 25 BUILDING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES 25 INNOVATIONS AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES 26 RENEWABLE ENERGY 27 VALUE ADDED WOOD SECTORS 28 CHEMICALS 30 MACHINE BUILDING AND ELECTRONICS 31 FOOD MANUFACTURING, AGRY-FOOD, VALUE ADDED AGRICULTURE 32 TOURISM AND LEISURE 33 INVESTMENT PROPERTY 34 REAL ESTATE MARKET 34 INDUSTRIAL SITES 37 LIVING IN IVANO-FRANKIVSK REGION 39 m k 0 0 0 WHY IVANO-FRANKIVSK REGION 2 nd Ivano-Frankivsk region ranks 2 in Ukraine for investment attractiveness in m the «Rating of the Investment Attractiveness of Ukrainian Regions – 2014» k 0 0 5 1 Diverse, skilled and educated employees are a key feature of the region’s labour market. Businesses find it easy to recruit and retain high quality people, and our labour costs compare low with the rest of Ukraine Advanced education, scientific and innovation platform. Local companies invest significant sums in order to continually bring innovative products and Ireland services to the market United Kingdom London 1901 km A welcoming business environment with competitive costs, friendly infrastructure, and efficient regional governance. Highly competitive rental rates are lower than in many regions across Ukraine An emerging economy with high investment potential. Multinational companies in electro-technical and machine-building sectors have invested France here. The region is Ukraine’s only producer of ethylene, polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride suspension. Two-thirds of all washing machines in Ukraine are produced in the region Outstanding quality of life, rich cultural and natural environment, clean and friendly cities, made attractive by combining their quality and cost of living.
    [Show full text]
  • IRF Annual Report for 2009
    International Renaissance Foundation Black 2009 Annual Report P349, ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL RENAISSANCE FOUNDATION he International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) is an integral part of the Open Society Institute network (established by American philanthropist George Soros) that incorporates national and regional foundations in more than thirty countries around the world, including Africa, Central and Eastern Europe and the former TSoviet Union. IRF was founded in 1990. The mission of the International Renaissance Foundation – is to promote open democratic society in Ukraine Black by providing financial and organizational support for important civil society initiatives. IRF remains one of the largest donor foundations in Ukraine, supporting civil society organizations working in areas that are part of the Foundation’s priorities. Every year, IRF provides up to $7 million in support to NGOs P349, in different regions of Ukraine. In addition to offering grants to other organizations, IRF also pursues its own (operational) activities, implementing projects in its target sectors that are also selected by public representatives. The Foundation is also well-known as an expert organization, initiator of effective projects, open discussions and catalyst of social change. Openness and transparency of donor activities, and conformity with the needs of society are the main principles that guide the work of the International Renaissance Foundation. The public is involved in the distribution of Foundation funds for the needs of building a democratic open society through participation in the Executive Board and IRF Program Boards. IRF distributes the majority of its grants to non-governmental organizations after open competitions are held for projects pursuing the program priorities set by leading representatives of local civil society The IRF Board is the main public body that forms the strategy for the entire organization.
    [Show full text]