Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Portage County, Ohio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Portage County, Ohio Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Portage County, Ohio By JOHN D. \VINSLOW and GEORGE W. WHITE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 511 Prepared in cooperation with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 00-.310 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Glacial deposits of Portage County-Continued Abstract___________________________________________ 1 Wisconsin Glaciation-Continued Page Introduction_______________________________________ 1 Cary stade_________________________________ 28 Purpose and scope of the investigation____________ 1 ]{entTill__________________________________ 28 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 2 Composition ______ ---------------_-____ 28 Previous work and sources of information__________ 2 Kent moraine __________ -- __ ----_-______ 28 Location_______________________________________ 2 Kent ground moraine _________ ------_-__ 30 Climate_______________________________________ 3 Subsurface Kent TilL ____ ---_________ --_ 30 Economic development__________________________ 3 Retreat of ]{entice_____________________ 31 Ground-water utilization_________________________ 4 Lavery Till _________________ - _-_ -_ -_ - _- _-_ _ 3 3 Numbering system of wells and seismic sites_ __ _ __ _ 4 Windham Sand _____________ ------_---_-_-__ 33 Topography and drainage________________________ 4 Hiram TilL _________________ - _-- - _-- - _-_ - _ _ 34 Topography of the bedrock surface_______________ 5 Composition ________________ ---_--_____ 34 Methods of investigation ____ ---------------- 6 Surface expression ___________ -__________ 35 Well records, photogeology, and fieldwork__ 6 Thickness and stratigraphic relation_______ 35 Seismic profiles_________________________ 6 Hiram outwash ____________ ----- ___ ----_ 35 Streamflow records____ __ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ 6 Retreat of the Hiram ice________________ 38 Buried valleys and valley fills________________ 6 Ground-water hydrology ______ ---_------------.------- 38 Stratigraphy of the bedrock formations________________ 7 General________________________________________ 7 Fluctuations of ground-water levels________________ 39 Pumping tests__________________________________ 39 Pre-Berea units___ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ _ _ 8 Chagrin Shale_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ __ __ _ __ 8 Geology and ground-water conditions in specific town- Ohio Shale (Cleveland Member)______________ 8 ships____________________________________________ 41 Cussewago Sandstone_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ 9 Atwater Township _________________ - __ --_-_-____ 42 Bedford Shale ___________________________ . _ _ 9 Aurora TownshiP------------------------------- 42 Berea Sandstone________________________________ 9 Brimfield Township ______ - _________ - ___ -_-_-_-__ 43 Cuyahoga Group_______________________________ 10 Charlestown Township__________________________ 43 Orangeville Shale_ __ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ __ _ __ 10 Deerfield Township ______ - _- _- _- _- _- _- _- _- _- _--- 44 Sharpsville Sandstone_______________________ 10 Edinburg Township __________ -_-_-_- ___ -_-_-_-_- 44 Meadville Shale_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ __ __ _ __ _ _ 10 Franklin Township _______________ - _____ -_-_-____ 45 Pottsville Formation____________________________ 10 Freedom Township ______________ -_-_-_-_---____ 45 Sharon Member____________________________ 11 Hiram Township ________ -_-_-_----------------- 46 Conglomerate unit______________________ 11 Mantua Township______________________________ 46 Shale unit______________________________ 12 Nelson Township ______ ------------------------- 47 Sharon coal________________________ 12 Palmyra Township _______ ---_------------------- 48 Quakertown coaL___________________ 13 Paris Township _______ ------_------------------- 48 Connoquenessing Sandstone Member__________ 13 Randolph Township _____ - _- _----..,-------------- 48 Mercer Member____________________________ 14 Ravenna Township ____ -_----------------------- 49 Lower and middle Mercer coals___________ 15 Rootstown Township ___ ------------------------- 49 Lower limestone unit____________________ 15 Shalersville Township ____ ----------------------- 50 Bedford coaL__________________________ 15 Streetsboro Township ________ ------------------- 50 Upper limestone unit____________________ 16 Suffield Township _____ ----_--------------------- 51 Tionesta coaL__________________________ 16 Windham TownshiP----------------------------- 51 Homewood Sandstone Member_______________ 16 Chemical quality of the ground water ________ -_-_-_-_- 51 Glacial deposits of Portage County____________________ 17 Quality of water in the principal aquifers__________ 54 Glacial erosion_________________________________ 18 Berea Sandstone _____________________ - ___ - _ - 54 Striations__________________________________ 18 Cuyahoga Group___________________________ 54 Rockhills_________________________________ 18 Pennsylvanian rocks _______________________ - 54 Valleys____________________________________ 18 Glacial drift_______________________________ - 54 Stratigraphic classification_______________________ 18 Significance of mineral constituents _______________ - 55 Pre-Illinoian Glaciation__________________________ 20 Temperature_______________________________ 55 Illinoian Glaciation_____________________________ 20 Color______________________________________ 55 Sangamon Interglaciation___ _ __ __ ___ _ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ 22 pH________________________________________ 55 Wisconsin Glaciation____________________________ 22 Specific conductance _________________ -_-_--- 55 Mogadore TilL_____________________________ 23 Silica______________________________________ 56 Post-Mogadore intervaL_____________________ 28 Iron and manganese_________________________ 56 m IV COXTEXTS Chemical quality of the ground water-Continued Chemical quality of the ground water-Continued Significance of mineral constituents-Continued Page' Sjgnificance of mineral constituents-Continued Page Calcium and magnesium __________ --- _______ _ 56 Dissolved solids ___________________________ _ 57 IIardness _________________________________ _ Sodium and potassium __ -_-------- __ -- _____ _ 56 57 Carbonate and bicarbonate _________________ _ 56 Summary_________________________________________ _ Suliate ___________________________________ _ 57 56 Groundwater _________________________________ _ Chloride__________________________________ _ 56 57 Quality of water _______________________________ _ Fluoride __________________________________ _ 56 58 Nitrate _______________ -_------------------- 57 References cited ___________________________________ _ 58 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in pocket] PLATE 1. Graphic logs of water and test wells, Portage County, Ohio. 2. Map of Portage County, Ohio, showing the location of water and test wells, oil and gas wells, and seismic sites. 3. Bedrock geologic map and sections of Portage County, Ohio. 4. Glacial deposits in Portage County, Ohio. 5. Map showing principal sources of ground water and approximate contours on the bedrock surface in Portage County, Ohio. Page FIGURE 1. Index map of Ohio showing Portage CountY------------------------------------------------------- 3 2. Photograph of the conglomerate unit of the Sharon Member of the Pottsville Formation at Kennedy Ledge__ 12 3. Photograph of the Connoquenessing Sandstone Member of the Pottsville Formation along the Ohio Turn- pike--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 4. Photograph of the Homewood Sandstone Member of the Pottsville Formation in Edinburg Township_____ 17 5. Map of Ohio showing margins of glacial lobes------------------------------------------------------ 17 6. Map showing surface extent of Illinoian drift and Wisconsin rock-stratigraphic units____________________ 17 7. Map showing location of petrographic samples and measured sections_________________________________ 19 8. Geologic section of Ravenna Sand and Gravel Co. pit_______________________________________________ 21 9. Columnar sections of weathering horizons of Mogadore Till in Summit County---------------------·--- 23 10. Geologic section in the Petersen mine, Atwater TownshiP-------------------------------------------- 24 11. Geologic section in cut for drainage diversion, Ohio Turnpike interchange______________________________ 25 12. Columnar sections of tills and drift in Cuyahoga lobe________________________________________________ 25 13. Columnar sections of tills and drift in Grand River lobe_____________________________________________ 26 14-18. Geologic sections: 14. Cut in highway 14, in the northern part of Ravenna_________________________________________ 27 15. Cut at Keller Mines, Atwater TownshiP--------------------------------------------- _____ 27 16. Windham through Newton Falls--------------------------------------------------·- _____ 27 17 Ohio Turnpike cut, 1 mile northeast of Freedom____________________________________________ 30 18. Ohio Turnpike cut, 1 mile northeast of Streetsboro__________________________________________ 32 19. Measured columnar sections of weathering horizons in Kent Till______________________________________ 32 20. Measured columnar sections of weathering
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 1. Natural History
    CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY —THE WILDERNESS THAT GREETED THE FIRST SETTLERS The land one sees today traveling through northern Ohio took gone. Thus, some 14,000 years ago as the last glacier receded millions of years to form. We can see evidence of tropical sea into the Lake Erie basin, the first Native Americans arrived and reefs on the Lake Erie Islands and deep ocean sediments here in began to utilize the natural resources that these natural processes the cliffs of the Black River. Ohio was just south of the equator had produced. at that time, some 350 million years ago, and over the millennia The natural history of Sheffield encompasses all those natural has migrated northward to its present position. Mountain features and processes of the environment that greeted the Native building to the east eventually raised the sea floor from under Americans, and later the pioneers, when they first arrived in the waves and erosion by streams, and later glacial ice, began Sheffield. To be sure, the landscape was a magnificent wilderness to sculpture the land. At the same time plants and animals were to the settlers, but it needed to be “tamed” in order to support evolving and began to populate the new land once the ice was the newcomers. Ice formation on the shale bluff of the Black River north of Garfield Bridge (2005). 1 BICENTENNIAL HISTORY OF SHEFFIELD TOPOGRAPHY Regional Physiography The topography of an area is the configuration of the land Physiography refers to the physical features or landforms of surface, including its relief [vertical differences in elevation of a region.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project
    OPEN HOUSE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT MEETING WITH OPEN MICROPHONE PUBLIC COMMENT SESSION Celebration Church 688 Dan Street, Akron, Ohio Tuesday, May 10, 2016 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project Existing Bridge Future Bridges: Steel I-Girder Bridge Type OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 4 2088 SOUTH ARLINGTON ROAD AKRON, OHIO 44306-4243 330-786-3100 WWW.ODOTDISTRICT4.ORG The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried-out by ODOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated December 11, 2015, and executed by FHWA and ODOT. State Route 8 Bridge Replacement Project The meeting format includes a brief project overview presentation at 5:45 pm. Following the presentation, interested individuals will have the opportunity to speak during an open microphone public comment session. Throughout the open house, personnel from ODOT District 4 and Gannett Fleming (project consultant) will be available to address questions. You are invited to comment regarding the project’s design and social, economic and environmental impacts on residences, businesses and the community. The proposed project will replace the 1,500-ft long bridge, known as the North Expressway Viaduct, carrying State Route 8 (SR-8) over various railroads, E. North Street and the Little Cuyahoga River Valley in the City of Akron. Two bridges will replace the one existing bridge. To the right is the preliminary plan for construction phases: 1. A new bridge (#1) will be built next to the existing bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Geology of Northeastern Ohio
    SDMS US EPA REGION V -1 SOME IMAGES WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE ILLEGIBLE DUE TO BAD SOURCE DOCUMENTS. GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY of NORTHEASTERN OHIO Edited by P. O. BANKS & RODNEY M. FELDMANN 1970 Northern Ohio Geological Society ELYP.i.A PU&UC LIBRARt as, BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF NORTHEASTERN OHIO PENNSYLVANIAN SYSTEM MISSISSIPPIAN SYSTEM DEVONIAN SYSTEM \V&fe'£:i£:VS:#: CANTON viSlSWSSWM FIGURr I Geologic map of northeastern Ohio. Individual formations within each time unit are not dis- -guished, and glacial deposits have been omitted. Because the bedding planes are nearly ••.crizontal, the map patterns of the contacts closely resemble the topographic contours at those z evations. The older and deeper units are most extensively exposed where the major rivers rave cut into them, while the younger units are preserved in the intervening higher areas. CO «< in Dev. Mississippian r-c Penn. a> 3 CO CD BRADF. KINOERHOOK MERAMEC —1 OSAGE CHESTER POTTSVIUE ro to r-» c-> e-> e= e-i GO n « -n V) CO V* o ^_ ^ 0. = -^ eo CO 3 c= « ^> <C3 at ta B> ^ °» eu ra to a O9 eo ^ a* s 1= ca \ *** CO ^ CO to CM v» o' CO to CO 3 =3 13- *•» \ ¥\ A. FIGURE 1. Columnar section ol the major stratigraphic units in northeastern Ohio showing their relative positions in the standard geologic time scale. The Devonian-Mississippian boundary is not known with certainty to lie within the Cleveland Shale. The base of the Mississippian in the northern part of the state is transitional with the Bradford Series of the Devonian System and may lie within the Cleveland Shale (Weller er a/., 1948).
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Devonian Formations in the Subsurface of Northwestern Ohio
    STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE OHIO DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION Horace R. Collins, State Geologist and Di v ision Chief David K. Webb, Jr., Geologist and Assistant Chief Eleanor J. Hyle, Secretary Jean S. Brown, Geologist and Editor Pauline Smyth, Geologist Betty B. Baber, Geologist REGIONAL GEOLOGY SECTION SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY SECTION Richard A. Struble, Geologist and Section Head William J. Buschman, Jr., Geologist and Section Head Richard M. Delong, Geologist Michael J. Clifford, Geologist G. William Kalb, Geochemist Adriaan J anssens, Geologist Douglas L. Kohout, Geologis t Frederick B. Safford, Geologist David A. Stith, Geologist Jam es Wooten, Geologist Aide Joel D. Vormelker, Geologist Aide Barbara J. Adams, Clerk· Typist B. Margalene Crammer, Clerk PUBLICATIONS SECTION LAKE ERIE SECTION Harold J. Fl inc, Cartographer and Section Head Charles E. Herdendorf, Geologist and Sectwn Head James A. Brown, Cartographer Lawrence L. Braidech, Geologist Donald R. Camburn, Cartovapher Walter R. Lemke, Boat Captain Philip J. Celnar, Cartographer David B. Gruet, Geologist Aide Jean J. Miller, Photocopy Composer Jean R. Ludwig, Clerk- Typist STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Horace R. Collins, Chief Report of Investigations No. 78 MIDDLE DEVONIAN FORMATIONS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO by A. Janssens Columbus 1970 GEOLOGY SERVES OHIO CONTENTS Page Introduction . 1 Previous investigations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Study methods . 4 Detroit River Group . .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. 6 Sylvania Sandstone ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC SUMMARY of the APPALACHIAN BASIN, with REFERENCE to the SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL of RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS by George W
    TEI-791 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY" GEOLOGIC SUMMARY OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN, WITH;REFERENCE TO THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS* By George W. Colton June 1961 Report TEI-791 This report is preliminary and ha^;not been edited for conformity with G^logical Survey format and nomenclature. ?1 ^Prepared on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission. CONTENTS Abstract* .......................... 5 Introduction. ........................ 7 Purpose of report. ................... 7 Organization of report .................. 7 Location and extent of area. .............. Q Acknowledgments. .................... 10 Geologic framework. ..................... 10 Depositional framework ................. 10 Structural framework .................. llj. Stratigraphy. ........................ 17 Late Precambrian stratified sequence .......... 17 Early Cambrian clastic sequence. ............ 18 Thickness and depth ................ 22 Cambrian-Ordovician carbonate sequence ......... 23 Thickness and depth . , ........... 35 Late Ordovician clastic sequence ............ 35 Thickness and depth ................ Mi- Early Silurian clastic sequence. ............ kk Thickness and depth ................ 51 Silurian-Devonian carbonate sequence .......... 52 Thickness and depth ................ 62 Devonian classic sequence. ............... 63 Thickness and depth ................ 69 Mississippian sequence ................. 70 Thickness and depth ................ 79 Pennsylvanian sequence ................. 79 Waste
    [Show full text]
  • Cuyahoga River RAP State of the River Report
    CUYAHOGA RIVER REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN STATE OF THE RIVER REPORT & PROCEEDINGSPROCEEDINGS OFOF THETHE OCTOCTOBEROBER 25,25, 20012001 SYMPOSIUMSYMPOSIUM JANUARY 2002 Sponsored by: The Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Prepared by Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan Coordinating Committee Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan 1299 Superior Ave, Cleveland Ohio 44114 (216) 241-2414 FAX (216) 621-3024 This report was funded by grants from the George Gund Foundation, the Cleveland Foundation, the GAR Foundation, the Ohio EPEPAA andand thethe USUS ForestForest ServiceService DivisionDivision ofof StateState andand PrivatePrivate ForestryForestry NortheasternNortheastern Area,Area, andand technicaltechnical supportsupport from the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency. Additional reproduction of this report was funded with support from the US Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes National Program Office CUYAHOGA RIVER REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN STATE OF THE RIVER REPORT AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE OCTOBER 25, 2001 SYMPOSIUM JANUARY 2002 Prepared by Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan Coordinating Committee Cuyahoga River Remedial Action Plan 1299 Superior Ave, Cleveland Ohio 44114 (216) 241-2414 FAX (216) 621-3024 This report was funded by grants from the George Gund Foundation, the Cleveland Foundation, the GAR Foundation, the Ohio EPA and the US Forest Service Division of State and Private Forestry Northeastern Area, and technical support from the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency Acknowledgements Preparation of this document
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippian Stratigraphy of Northwestern Pennsylvania
    Mississippian Stratigraphy of Northwestern Pennsylvania GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1351-A Prepared in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Topographic and Geologic Survey r ' > 'I . t. I i 7 IT! i . * r * A »« ft - » '" * / 1 f V 4 1* / I 'i'- I 4 I Mississippian Stratigraphy of Northwestern Pennsylvania By GEORGE R. SCHINER and GRANT E. KIMMEL CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1331-A Prepared in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Topographic and Geologic Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V, E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600086 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1.25 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-2169 CONTENTS Page Abstract ____________________________ Al Introduction _______________________-__ 2 General geologic setting ____________ 3 Methods of investigation ________________ 3 Nomenclature ___________________________ _ 6 Stratigraphy ____________________________ _ 9 Cussewago Sandstone ______________ _ 9 Bedford Shale ____________________________ 11 Unnamed sandstone _____________________ 12 Berea Sandstone ___________________ _ 13 Corry Sandstone _________________________ 14 Shellhammer Hollow Formation _______________ 16 Cuyahoga Group (Orangeville Shale, Sharpsville Sandstone, Mead- ville Shale) ________________________________ 17 Orangeville Shale ___________________ _ 18 Bartholomew
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Ohio—The Precambrian
    No. 13 OHIOGeoFacts DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE GEOLOGY OF OHIO—THE PRECAMBRIAN Precambrian time (all of geologic time before the Cambrian Pe- million years ago a continent to the east collided with North America, riod) began when the Earth became a solid entity about 4.5 billion resulting in extensive crustal compression and development of a years ago and ended when the Cambrian Period began, about 570 mountain range that geologists call the Grenville Mountains. What million years ago. “Precambrian” is actually an informal term used is thought to be the zone of continental collision, known as a suture by geologists. This long period of time is divided formally into two zone, is located in eastern Ohio and is called the Coshocton Zone. eons—the Archeozoic (greater than 2.5 billion years ago) and the As these continents collided along a 3,000-mile-long line, stretch- Proterozoic (2.5 billion to 570 million years ago). Despite the immense ing perhaps from Sweden to Mexico, rocks were folded, twisted, span of time it represents, the Precambrian is the most poorly known metamorphosed, and thrust westward across part of the rift zone of the geologic subdivisions in Ohio, in part because Precambrian in western Ohio. This north-south-oriented, 30-mile-wide zone of rocks are nowhere exposed in the state. These primarily crystalline east-dipping, imbricated thrust slices is called the Grenville Front igneous and metamorphic rocks are deeply buried beneath younger Tectonic Zone and marks the westward limit of the Grenville Moun- Paleozoic sedimentary rocks at depths ranging from about 2,500 feet tains.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Division of Geological Survey Great Lakes Geologic Mapping Coalition Publications Updated March 2020
    Link to ODGS Publications Ohio Division of Geological Survey Great Lakes Geologic Mapping Coalition Publications Updated March 2020 2019 Aden, Douglas, 2019, Karst in the Lilley Formation, Peebles 7.5-minute quadrangle, Ohio, in Thorleifson, L. H., ed., Geologic Mapping Forum 2019 Abstracts: Minnesota Geological Survey Open-File Report 19-1, p. 4–5. Aden, D. J., 2019, Surficial geology of the Gnadenhutten quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Aden, D. J., 2019, Surficial geology of the New Philadelphia quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Aden, D. J., 2019, Surficial geology of the Tippecanoe quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Aden, D. J., 2019, Surficial geology of the Uhrichsville quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Aden, D. J., and Parrick, B. D., 2018, Karst of northern portions of the Peebles and Jaybird 7.5-minute quadrangles, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey Open-File Report 2018-3, 40 p., 44 map tiles. Nash, T. A., 2019, Surficial geology of the Antrim quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000. Nash, T. A., 2019, Surficial geology of the Birmingham quadrangle, Ohio: Columbus, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Digital Map Series SG-4A, scale 1:24,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (Usas): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio
    Development of Drinking Water and Ecological Unusually Sensitive Areas (USAs): Examples Using the Water and Biological Resources of Ohio Colin Plank, Scott Zengel, Heidi Hinkeldey, Elaine Inouye, William Holton, Jeffery Dahlin, and Jacqueline Michel Research Planning, Inc., 1121 Park Street, Columbia, SC 29201, [email protected], 803-256-7322 (voice); 803-254-6445 (fax); and Christina Sames and Samuel Hall, Office of Pipeline Safety, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA) is required to identify areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage in the event of a hazardous liquid pipeline accident. Pipeline operators that can affect "unusually sensitive areas" (USAs) must develop and follow an integrity management program to assess and evaluate the integrity of their pipelines. After extensive consultation with experts, government agencies, and other stakeholders, a process was developed to identify USAs for drinking water and ecological resources. In general the USA identification process involves selecting a subset of USA candidates from the larger group of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs), and then applying various filter criteria to the candidates to determine final USAs. For drinking water USAs this means identifying potentially sensitive public water systems (PWS), specifically surface water intakes and ground water wells, and subjecting them to filter
    [Show full text]